0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Anser

Uploaded by

montesmossaiah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Anser

Uploaded by

montesmossaiah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

LEAST PRIVILEGE ACCESS AND DEFENSE- Conclusion

IN-DEPTH: A Case Study on Enhancing IT


Implementing strict least privilege
Security Posture after a Major Data Breach
access and a defense-in-depth strategy is
essential to improving security and protecting
business assets.

By: Mel Benjamin U. Montes


Introduction

Background
Date: Aug. 16, 2024
FundLT Corporation has expanded
significantly over the last decade, integrating
cloud solutions, mobile apps, and distributed
labor. This growth has led to security
challenges, particularly with access control and
data protection.

Problem Statement

The recent breach exposed significant


flaws in access control, allowing unauthorized
access to classified information through over-
Executive Summary permissioned employee accounts.

Overview

FundLT Corporation, a rapidly growing Objectives


financial services firm, recently suffered a major
- Analyze the breach and its impact.
data breach due to flawed access controls and
excessive permissions on employee accounts. - Evaluate current security practices.
The breach exposed sensitive customer data
- Recommend improvements based on least
and highlighted severe security weaknesses.
privilege and defense-in-depth principles.

Key Points
Case Presentation
- Rapid expansion and technology integration
Description
introduced new security risks.
The breach involved unauthorized
- Compromised accounts had excessive
access to confidential customer data through an
permissions.
over-permissioned employee account.
- The breach revealed critical security
infrastructure gaps.
Key Players

- IT and Security Teams: Responsible for


managing and securing IT infrastructure.
- Affected Employees and Customers: Whose
data was compromised.
Recommended Solution
- Third-Party Contractors: Supporting IT
Solution
systems.
Adopt a new access control policy
based on least privilege, supported by enhanced
Relevant Data multi-factor authentication (MFA) and regular
security audits.
- Incident reports

- Access logs
Implementation Plan
- Security audit reports
- Policy Revision: Update permissions within 30
days.
Analysis
- MFA Enhancement: Implement within 60 days.
Problem Analysis
- Security Audits: Conduct semiannually, starting
The breach revealed flaws in access controls, immediately.
with excessive permissions increasing the attack
surface and facilitating lateral movement within
the network. Justification

This approach ensures employees have


only necessary access, mitigating breach risks
Alternative Solutions
and enhancing overall security through MFA and
1. Revise Access Controls: Tighten permissions regular audits.
based on job roles.

2. Enhance MFA: Implement stronger


Conclusion
authentication for critical systems.
Summary
3. Regular Security Audits: Conduct frequent
reviews of access permissions and security The breach at FundLT Corporation
practices. exposed critical access control deficiencies.
Implementing least privilege and defense-in-
depth strategies will significantly improve
Evaluation of Alternatives security.

- Revised Access Controls: Reduces access Result


scope but requires thorough permission review.
Adopting these measures will reduce
- Enhanced MFA: Provides increased security the risk of future breaches and better protect
but may be costly and require user training. sensitive information.

- Regular Security Audits: Helps find


vulnerabilities but can be resource-intensive.
Lessons Learned

- Least privilege is crucial.

- Strong security controls help mitigate threats.


- Regular updates and reviews of security
policies are essential.

References

- Kaufman, C., Perlman, R., & Speciner, M.


(2014). Network Security: Private
Communication in a Public World* (3rd ed.).
Prentice Hall.

- Stallings, W. (2022). Computer Security:


Principles and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson.

- Andress, J., & Winterfeld, S. (2018). The


Basics of Information Security (3rd ed.).
Syngress.

- Shirey, R. (2007). Internet Security Glossary,


Version 2. RFC 4949. IETF.

- Kaufman, C. (2021). Security Engineering: A


Guide to Building Dependable Distributed
Systems (2nd ed.). Wiley.

- NIST (2018). Special Publication 800-53:


Security and Privacy Controls for Information
Systems and Organizations. National Institute of
Standards and Technology.

- ISO/IEC 27001:2013. Information security


management systems – Requirements.
International Organization for Standardization.

- SANS Institute (2019). The Critical Security


Controls for Effective Cyber Defense (Version
7.1).

- Ponemon Institute (2023). Cost of a Data


Breach Report. IBM Security.

- CIS (2022). CIS Controls v8. Center for


Internet Security.

Appendices

- Appendix A: Incident Report Information

- Appendix B: Access Logs

- Appendix C: Security Audit Reports

You might also like