UTILITARIANISM
Utilitarianism is a theory of morality that supports actions that bring about happiness and
 opposes actions which bring sadness and pain, not just the happiness of the actor but also everyone
 affected by it. It’s a tradition of ethical philosophy that determines right from wrong by focusing on
 outcomes.
        Utilitarian theories generally share four elements: consequentialism, welfarism, impartiality,
 and additive aggregationism.
         Classical utilitarianism is distinctive because it accepts two additional elements: first, hedonism
 as a theory of well being ; second, the total view of population ethics.
        Utilitarianism will predict the action is right if it has brought happiness to the greatest number
 of people in a society, community and even a group.
          Utilitarianism is a reason based approach to determine right and wrong, but it also has its
 limitations. It does not account for things like feelings, culture, or justice.
           Utilitarianism is mainly in favor of good for the greatest number of people e.g., you display
 utilitarianism at work when you take actions to ensure that the office is a positive environment for you
 and your co- workers, it aims for the betterment of society as a whole.
         When it comes to utilitarianism, everyone’s happiness counts equally, pleasure or happiness is
 the only thing that has instinct value.
         Utilitarianism accepts consequentialism which is defined as follows:
         Consequentialism is the view that the moral rightness of actions (or rules, politics, etc.)
 depends on, and only on, the value of their consequences. All actions have consequences, but they are
 evaluated differently according to morals such as principles and morals.
         In the case of principles, when someone breaks a promise, it has bad consequences as it
 usually does but it is also not considered wrong when it comes to saving a life or it is unavoidable.
         If the difference in the consequences of alternative actions is not great, some utilitarians would
 not regard it as a moral issue.
          Utilitarianism puts forward that it is a virtue to improve one’s life better by increasing he good
 things in the world and minimizing the dad things. This means striving for pleasure and happiness while
 avoiding discomfort or unhappiness.
       In utilitarianism, it is possible for the right to be done from a bad motive. Utilitarianism may
 however protect the culprit from being blamed or praised.
         Utilitarianism also has trouble accounting for values such as justice and individual rights for
 example sacrificing one life for a bigger number. This will arguably produce the greatest good for the
 greater good, but few would be happy about this because there are no morals in that theory.
          Henry Sidgwick sought to support utilitarianism by showing that it follows from systematic
 reflection on the morality of common sense. He reasoned that utilitarianism could solve the difficulties
 and perplexities that arise from the vagueness and inconsistencies of common-sense doctrines.
         Utilitarians reject moral codes or systems that consist of commands or taboos that are based
 on customs, traditions, or orders given by leaders or supernatural beings. Instead utilitarians think that
 what makes a morality b true or justified is its positive contribution to human or non-human beings.
Utilitarianism in a political economy
        In politics throughout the centuries came up with different principles and they wrestled with a
 number of questions such as what constitutes “the greatest amount of good”? How is happiness
 defined? How is justice accommodated?
         In today politics the government only interferes in the private lives of the citizens so as to
 assure safety and security which is in favor of a great number of people although when it comes to
 rules and regulations it will always be a subject of debate because there are people who are being
 oppressed with some laws.
          The ones who are being oppressed are always compensated for by finding a solution for them
 that will make them happy and be able to bare the oppressing rules and regulations.
In business and commerce
        Utilitarianism is the most common approach to business ethics because of the way that it
 accounts for costs and benefits.
           The theory asserts that there are two types of utilitarianism practiced in the business world,
 act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
Act Utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism
          Act utilitarianism is used to determine the right action in some set of feasible actions, we
 should directly evaluate the actions to see which has the best consequences. This utilitarianism
 assesses the moral rightness of only and only of actions. It helps the largest number of people using
 the fairest methods possible.
         Act utilitarianism often demonstrates the concept that “the end justifies the means” or it’s
 worth it.
         Rule utilitarianism, what makes an action right is that it conforms to the set of rules that would
 have the best utilitarian consequences if they were generally accepted or followed because an action’s
 morality depends only on it’s conformity to a rule rather than it’s own consequences. This makes the
 most ethical actions possible for the benefit of the people.