Lecture 10 Fiscal Policy
Lecture 10 Fiscal Policy
Nikhil Damodaran
Lecture 10                        1 / 36
                                                               This Chapter
         1. Agenda
         2. 13.1. Scope of Fiscal Policy
         2.1 Automatic Stabilizers vs. Discretionary Fiscal Policy
         2.2 Australian Government Spending: Some Facts
         3. Fiscal Intervention
         3.1 Expansionary Fiscal Policy
         3.2 Contractionary Fiscal Policy
         4. Multipliers
         4.1 Government purchases multiplier
         4.2 Tax Multiplier
         4.3 Balanced Budget Multiplier
         4.4 Tax Rate Changes
         4.5 Multipliers: Some Remarks
         5. Limitations of Fiscal Policy
         5.1 Time Lags
         5.2 Crowding Out
         6. Debt and Deficits
         6.1 Structural Deficits
         6.2 Sovereign Debt
         7. Fiscal Policies in the Long Run
         7.1 Tax Reforms in the long run
Lecture 10                                                                    2 / 36
                                                          Agenda
Lecture 10                                                  Agenda                                        3 / 36
                                           13.1. Scope of Fiscal Policy
             ◦ Fiscal policy: Changes in federal taxes and purchases that are intended to achieve
               macroeconomic policy objectives, such as high employment, price stability and healthy
               rates of economic growth.
                  ◦ Anything which the government which amounts to direct intervention in markets is traditional
                     fiscal policy.
             ◦ Fiscal policy refers to the actions of the federal government, and not state, territory or local
               governments
                  ◦ Introducing state fiscal policy will complicate the analysis. This is a convenient abstraction.
             ◦ Automatic stabilizers – the part of fiscal policy which is linked to various economic variables
               which go up and down due to seasonal, cyclical, structural or other unanticipated
               circumstances.
             ◦ Here, income tax revenue and unemployment benefits follow business cycles, hence
               “automatic”. The policy makers do not have to intervene. But not all kinds of fiscal policy is
               automatic, some are based on “discretionary” choice.
         Government expenditure as a proportion of GDP increased by a large amount during the early to mid-1970s and trended downwards
         during the 1990s and into the 2000s, a result of the microeconomic reform policies of governments during this time. By 2006/2007,
         government expenditure as a proportion of GDP was around 23 per cent. Between 2008 to 2010, government expenditure as a
         proportion of GDP rose, peaking at 26 per cent of GDP in 2009/2010. Although it fluctuated, after 2010, government expenditure as
         a proportion of GDP generally remained higher than it had been during the 2000s.
Lecture 10                                                       13.1. Scope of Fiscal Policy                                                6 / 36
                                          Where does the government spend?
         The largest share of government expenditure in Australia goes to social security and welfare payments, at over 35 per cent in the
         2016/2017 financial year. The second largest single share of total government expenditure is health, at almost 16 per cent, followed
         by education at 7.5 per cent.
Lecture 10                                                         13.1. Scope of Fiscal Policy                                                 7 / 36
                                           How does it pay for the expenses?
         The largest proportion of government revenue comes from personal income taxation. For the 2016/2017 financial year, almost 48 per
         cent of federal government revenue came from individual income taxation. The second largest source of revenue is from company
         income taxation, at around 17 per cent of total revenue.
Lecture 10                                                       13.1. Scope of Fiscal Policy                                                8 / 36
                                          Expansionary Fiscal Policy
◦ “Desired” both in terms of long and short run are the same i.e. AD = SRAS = LRAS.
             ◦ Government can reduce direct taxes on income or indirect taxes on expenditure to increase
               AD indirectly by altering incentives.
                  ◦ A reduction in direct taxes increases disposable income. For eg: if income taxes are reduced,
                    you have more income left after taxes.
                  ◦ A reduction in indirect taxes increases real incomes as the prices of goods tend to reduce as
                    firms pass on the reduction in taxes as lower prices.
         The key idea for this figure is that the economy was initially at point A, which is a long run equilibrium. Overtime its capacity (LRAS),
         its short run supply (SRAS) and its demand (AD) moves to the right. In this case, AD does not move right enough so in the short run
         the economy is stuck at B. If policy is not introduced, then the economy will only slowly adjust and reach C. If policy is used, then the
         economy reaches to C in a shorter time span.
Lecture 10                                                              Fiscal Intervention                                                          10 / 36
                                         Contractionary Fiscal Policy
◦ “Desired” both in terms of long and short run are the same i.e. AD = SRAS = LRAS.
             ◦ Government can increase direct taxes on income or indirect taxes on expenditure to reduce
               AD indirectly by altering incentives.
                  ◦ An increase in direct taxes reduces disposable income. For eg: if income taxes are increased,
                    you have less income left after taxes.
                  ◦ An increase in indirect taxes reduces real incomes as the prices of goods tend to increase
                    when firms pass on the increase in indirect tax.
         The key idea for this figure is that the economy was initially at point A, which is a long run equilibrium. Overtime its capacity (LRAS),
         its short run supply (SRAS) and its demand (AD) moves to the right. In this case, AD moves too far right so in the short run the
         economy is at B. If policy is not introduced, then the economy will only slowly adjust and reach C. If policy is used, then the economy
         reaches to C in a shorter time span. The key difference is that for a contraction, government either needs to reduce its own spending
         or create incentives which force other people to spend less.
Lecture 10                                                             Fiscal Intervention                                                           12 / 36
       How do we identify whether economy needs contractionary or expansionary
                                    fiscal policies?
Lecture 10                                                 Multipliers                                    14 / 36
                                                     Multipliers
Lecture 10                                                Multipliers       15 / 36
                                     Government purchases multiplier
             ◦ Multipliers for government purchases for the above model can be calculated as:
                                                       ∆Y     1
                                                           =
                                                       ∆Ḡ   1−c
Lecture 10                                               Multipliers                                      16 / 36
             Government purchases multiplier: Intuition
Lecture 10                      Multipliers               17 / 36
                               Government purchases multiplier: Intuition
             ◦ Why does this occur? Because each time someone spends money, someone else earns it.
               This person in-turn spends it, making the third persons earning and so on. Every one time
               spending thus creates multiple rounds of income generation. If we measure the effect of the
               first spending after the economy reaches new equiliibrium, we get the multiplier.
             ◦ Total effect is greater than direct effect. How much more depends on how much of income
               is consumed
Lecture 10                                               Multipliers                                         18 / 36
                              Government purchases multiplier: Intuition
             ◦ Example: A $100 increase in Ḡ has $100 direct effect on Y. $100 increase in Y increases
               consumption C by $c = 0.4 = 40$ (MPC) which adds further to the increase in Y. Why?
               Government build roads, employs people. They now have incomes which they go and
               spend on their consumption.
Lecture 10                                              Multipliers                                       19 / 36
                                                  Tax Multipliers
             ◦ Tax multiplier: is a measure of the effect of changes in tax rates on the GDP of an economy.
             ◦ The tax multiplier for the model developed so far is:
                                                       ∆Y     −c
                                                           =
                                                       ∆T̄   1−c
             ◦ Increases in government purchases and cuts in taxes have a positive multiplier effect on
               equilibrium real GDP. Decreases in government purchases and increases in taxes have a
               negative multiplier effect on equilibrium real GDP.
Lecture 10                                                Multipliers                                         20 / 36
                                           Balanced Budget Multiplier
             ◦ If we assume that Ḡ = T̄ i.e. budgets are balanced for our model, then we obtain a
               balanced budget multiplier.
                                                                                    1
             ◦ Consider c = 0.75. Then the government spending multiplier is       1−c
                                                                                         = 4. This implies that
               if government spending increases by 10$ bn, then output increases by 40$ bn.
             ◦ However, since Ḡ = T̄ , when government spending increases by 10$ bn, then taxes should
               increase by 10$ bn too!
                                                  −0.75
             ◦ This implies a tax multiplier of   0.25
                                                          = −3. Hence an increase in tax by 10$ bn causes
               output to fall by 30$ bn.
                                                                                          ∆Y
             ◦ Net impact on output is +10$ bn. So the balanced budget multiplier is      ∆Ḡ
                                                                                                = 1.
Lecture 10                                                    Multipliers                                         21 / 36
                       Tax Rate Changes: Government Purchases Multipliers
             ◦ Now consider a model in which tax revenue is not the exogenous instrument. Instead,
               policy maker controls tax rates τ . This complicates the calculation of government
               purchases multiplier.
                                                  C =C̄ + c (Y − T )
                                                   I =Ī     G = Ḡ       T = τY
                                               ∆Y        1
                                                  =
                                               ∆Ḡ 1 − c (1 − τ )
             ◦ The value of the tax rate (τ ) affects the size of the multiplier effect. (a) The higher the tax
               rate the smaller the multiplier effect. (b) A cut in the tax rate increases the size of the
               multiplier effect.
             ◦ Note: For tax rate changes, now we can only calculate the balanced budget multiplier i.e. to
               ask what happens to output when tax rate changes if these changes lead to changes in
               government spending.
Lecture 10                                                  Multipliers                                           22 / 36
                                       Multipliers: Some Remarks
         If producers supply any quantity in the short run at the ongiong price, then multipliers can be
         larger and fiscal policy can work wonders! The upward-sloping aggregate supply curve causes
         the price level to rise as aggregate demand increases.
Lecture 10                                             Multipliers                                         23 / 36
                                         Multipliers: Some Remarks
◦ An increase in taxes will reduce household disposable income and consumption spending
◦ Businesses hit by this reduction in spending will lower production and lay off workers
Lecture 10                                                Multipliers                                   24 / 36
                                           Limitations of Fiscal Policy
             ◦ Timing Lags: the average time from identifying an economic problem to addressing it can
               take upto two quarters, if not more.
                  ◦ Reinhart and Rogoff show facts about the 2008-09 financial crisis. For eg: unemployment rate
                    increased from 5% to 12% in a matter of a year.
                  ◦ The fact that there was this consistent increase for over two years implies that government
                    policy either (a) could not prevent it or (b) didnt do enough in time.
                  ◦ Real GDP per capita also declined sharply, and the average length of a recession following a
                    financial crisis has been nearly two years.
             ◦ Crowding Out: is the idea that when government intervenes in the market, it competes for
               resources which makes it expensive for private players to operate and hence forces them to
               exit the market.
                  ◦ Most economists agree that there is partial crowding out in the short run, and complete
                    crowding out in the long run. i.e. there is no long-run effect on GDP from a permanent
                    increase in government spending.
             ◦ Crowding Out: is the idea that when government intervenes in the market, it competes for
               resources which makes it expensive for private players to operate and hence forces them to
               exit the market.
                  ◦ Most economists agree that there is partial crowding out in the short run, and complete
                    crowding out in the long run. i.e. there is no long-run effect on GDP from a permanent
                    increase in government spending.
                  ◦ Financial crowding out example: To finance a budget deficit, the government will sell more
                    bonds and securities, which may increase interest rates. This increase in rates slows down
                    investments because of higher cost of borrowing.
             ◦ Crowding Out: is the idea that when government intervenes in the market, it competes for
               resources which makes it expensive for private players to operate and hence forces them to
               exit the market.
                  ◦ Most economists agree that there is partial crowding out in the short run, and complete
                    crowding out in the long run. i.e. there is no long-run effect on GDP from a permanent
                    increase in government spending.
                  ◦ Financial crowding out example: To finance a budget deficit, the government will sell more
                    bonds and securities, which may increase interest rates. This increase in rates slows down
                    investments because of higher cost of borrowing.
                  ◦ Resource crowding out example: Government spending can lead to demand for labor, which
                    can take workers away from other jobs. This causes other sectors to compete for workers and
                    pay workers more, leading to upward pressure on prices.
             ◦ Budget deficit: The situation in which the government’s expenditures are greater than its tax
               revenue.
             ◦ Budget surplus: The situation in which the government’s expenditures are less than its tax
               revenue.
             ◦ Implication: If the government has a budget deficit, this has to be financed by borrowing,
               which contributes to net debt.
                   Net debt
Lecture 10        Debt and Deficits   29 / 36
                                                Debt and Deficits
               where:
               Gt = government purchases of goods and services
               iBt = interest payment on existing government debt
               Bt +1 − Bt = change in government debt.
               Note that Bt +1 will be repayable next year and Bt is repayable this year.
               Transferst = transfer payments by government
               Taxest = tax revenue
               Let: Tt = Taxest − Transferst
         The deficit or surplus in the federal government’s budget if the economy were at potential GDP provides a more accurate measure of
         the impact on the economy of government expenditure and taxation policies
             ◦ Supply side fiscal policy: i.e. fiscal policies designed to shift the LRAS to the right by
               improving the productive capacity of an economy.
             ◦ Optimal Taxation: is the idea of designing a tax system such that the post tax output is
               greater than or equal to pre-tax output.
             ◦ Usually, zero income and capital gains taxes increase output for most economies, at least in
               theory.
             ◦ Tax simplification and compliance: There is an argument that a simple tax system is easy to
               levy.
◦ This also promotes tax compliance and minimizes cost of monitoring tax evasion.
         Most economists agree that there are supply side effects of tax reforms, but the magnitude of these effects is debated because its
         hard to estimate these effects. For example, some economists argue that the increase in the quantity of labour supplied following a
         tax cut will be limited because many people work a number of hours set by their employers and lack the opportunity to work
         additional hours. Focusing on the impact of tax cuts on aggregate demand, while ignoring any impact on aggregate supply, yields
         accurate forecasts of future movements in real GDP and the price level,which indicates that the supply-side effects must be small.