The first Mass in the Philippines
Historical Evidence and Arguments
Limasawa:
* Pigafetta's Account: Antonio Pigafetta, a chronicler of Magellan's expedition, provides a
detailed account of the first Mass, describing the island of "Mazaua." Many historians believe
that "Mazaua" refers to Limasawa based on geographical descriptions and historical context.
* Archaeological Findings: Some archaeological discoveries on Limasawa, such as the
presence of Spanish-era artifacts, have been cited as supporting evidence.
* Official Recognition: The National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NCHP) officially
recognizes Limasawa as the site of the first Mass.
Butuan:
* Pigafetta's Account: Some interpretations of Pigafetta's text suggest that "Mazaua" might refer
to Butuan, a significant trading port at the time.
* Historical Significance: Butuan has a rich history and was a thriving trading center, which
could make it a plausible location for the first Mass.
The Ongoing Debate
The debate between Butuan and Limasawa continues to fascinate historians and the public
alike. While Limasawa is officially recognized, the Butuan claim persists, fueled by different
interpretations of historical documents and archaeological evidence.
Key factors contributing to the debate:
* Interpretation of Pigafetta's Account: Different scholars interpret Pigafetta's descriptions in
various ways, leading to differing conclusions.
* Geographical and Historical Context: The geographical and historical context of the 16th
century Philippines is complex and subject to interpretation.
* Archaeological Evidence: The limited archaeological evidence available can be interpreted in
multiple ways.
Despite the ongoing debate, both Butuan and Limasawa hold significant historical and cultural
importance. Both locations have embraced their connection to the first Mass and have
developed historical sites and cultural events to commemorate this significant event.
