0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views35 pages

Well Test Part 3

Well tests

Uploaded by

mahmodhalemo035
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views35 pages

Well Test Part 3

Well tests

Uploaded by

mahmodhalemo035
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Part 3

Wellbore Storage Effect


Dr. Sayed Gomaa
Wellbore Storage

Types of wellbore storage


▪ A wellbore storage effect caused by fluid
expansion
▪ A wellbore storage effect caused by changing
fluid level in the casing–tubing annulus
Wellbore Storage

▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by fluid


expansion:-
▪ During the drawdown (Unloading)
▪ As the bottom-hole pressure drops, the
wellbore fluid expands and, thus,
▪ the initial surface flow rate is not from the
formation, but basically from the fluid that had
been stored in the wellbore.
Unloading

Rate Surface Rate

Bottomhole
Rate
0 Time
Wellbore Storage

▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by fluid


compression:-
▪ During the buildup (Afterflow)
▪ As the well is shut in at the surface, bottom-
hole flow continues.
▪ The pressure increase due to the compression
of fluid in the wellbore.
Afterflow

Bottomhole flow
Rate
Surface Rate continues after
shut-in

Bottomhole
Rate
Time
Wellbore Storage
▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by fluid
expansion:-
∆𝑉
𝑐=
𝑉∆𝑃

𝑞𝐵𝑜 ∆𝑡
𝑐=
24𝑉∆𝑃

𝑞𝐵𝑜 ∆𝑡
∆𝑃 =
24𝑐𝑉

𝑞𝐵𝑜
log ∆𝑃 = log + log ∆𝑡
24𝑐𝑉

Wellbore storage effect caused by fluid expansion:


∆𝑉
𝐶𝐹𝐸 = 𝐶 = 𝑐𝑉 = 𝑉𝑤𝑏 𝑐𝑤𝑏 = ∆𝑃
Wellbore Storage

Unit-slope
line

(wellbore storage)

Early-time Middle- Late-time


region time region
region

Elapsed time (Dt ), hrs


Wellbore Storage
▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by fluid
expansion:-
𝑞𝐵𝑜 ∆𝑡
𝑐=
24𝑉∆𝑃

∆𝑃 𝑞𝐵𝑜
=
∆𝑡 24𝑐𝑉

∆𝑃 𝑞𝐵𝑜
𝑡 = .𝑡
∆𝑡 24𝑐𝑉

∆𝑃 𝑞𝐵𝑜
log 𝑡 = log + log 𝑡
∆𝑡 24𝑐𝑉
Wellbore Storage

▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by changing fluid


level in the casing–tubing annulus:-
▪ Falling level during a drawdown test
▪ Rising fluid level during a pressure buildup test
Wellbore Storage

▪ Wellbore storage effect caused by changing fluid


level in the casing–tubing annulus:-
144𝐴𝑎
𝐶𝐹𝐿 =
5.615𝜌

𝜋 𝐼𝐷𝐶 2 − 𝑂𝐷𝑇 2
𝐴𝑎 =
4 × 144
Unit Slope

▪ Early unit slope (EUS)


✓In case of wellbore storage
▪ Late unit slope (LUS)
✓In case of closed reservoir to determine the
reservoir extension (using boundary test)
𝑞𝐵𝑜 ∆𝑡
𝐴ℎ𝜙 =
24𝑐∆𝑃

𝑞𝐵𝑜
log ∆𝑃 = log + log ∆𝑡
24𝑐𝑉
Δ𝑝 & Derivative Function
• For drawdown:
Δ𝑝 = 𝑝𝑖 − 𝑝𝑤𝑓
𝑑(Δ𝑝)
𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = −𝑡
𝑑(𝑡)
• For buildup:
Δ𝑝 = 𝑝𝑤𝑠 − 𝑝𝑤𝑓 𝑎𝑡 Δ𝑡=0

𝑝𝑖+1 − 𝑝𝑖−1
∆𝑝′ =
𝑥𝑖+1 − 𝑥𝑖−1

𝑡𝑝 + ∆𝑡
∆𝑡𝑒 = ∆𝑡
𝑡𝑝
𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = ∆𝑡𝑒 ∆𝑝′
The Diagnostic Plot

Pressure change (Dp)

Pressure derivative (Dp )

Elapsed time (Dt ), hrs


The Diagnostic Plot

Early-time Middle- Late-time


region time region
region

Elapsed time (Dt ), hrs


Multiple-well Tests

The two main types of multiple-well testing are:


▪ Interference Test
▪ Pulse Test
Multiple-well Tests
The main objectives of multiple-well tests:
• The presence or lack of communication between the test well and
surrounding wells
• Estimation of formation permeability
• Estimation of porosity-compressibility product
Interference Test
The procedure of interference test
• All the test wells are shut-in until their wellbore pressures
stabilize.
• The active well is then allowed to produce or inject at constant
rate and the pressure response in the observation well (s) is
observed.
• When the active well starts to produce, the pressure in the
shut-in observation well begins to respond after some "time
lag" that depends on the reservoir rock and fluid properties.
Interference Test
q
. . . measure
pressure response
at another well

produce one well


at constant rate
Interference Test
Interference Test
Vertical Interference Test
• This test is conducted to:
• Determine vertical permeability
• Determine cross flow between two layers separated by a low-
permeability layer
Pulse Test
Test Procedure:
▪ The active well produces and then, is shut in, returned to
production and shut in again
▪ Repeated but with production or shut-in periods rarely
exceeding more than a few hours
▪ Produces a pressure response in the observation wells
which usually can be interpreted unambiguously (even
when other wells in the field continue to produce)
▪ The pulse length used in a pulse test is short, ranging
from a few hours to a few days, so boundaries seldom
affect the test data.
Pulse Test
q
. . . measure
pressure response
at offset well(s)

Alternately
produce and shut
in one well . . .
Pulse Test
Drill Stem Test
The information that may obtained from a drill stem test:
• Initial reservoir pressure
• Flow rate
• Fluid sample
• Effective permeability
• Transmissibility
• Skin factor
• Radius of investigation
• Well productivity
• Wellbore storage effect
Drill Stem Test
Test Duration
Drill Stem Test
• First flow period (Cleanup period)
• to remove any excess pressure, which may have
resulted from setting the packers.
• the wellbore fluids, and, later, the drilling fluid (mud) that
has invaded the formation in the vicinity of the wellbore
flow to surface.
• First shut in period
• To determine the initial reservoir pressure
Drill Stem Test
• Main flow period
• to evaluate the formation for some distance from the
well.
• Final shut in period.
• to calculate the transmissibility and other
characteristics of the reservoir.
Drill Stem Test
Test Duration

Period Duration, min


Initial Flow Period 5 - 10
Initial shut in Period 30 - 60
Final Flow Period 60 - 80
Final shut in Period 1.5 – 2 × second flow period
Example on RFT
A series of formation tests were obtained for three adjacent wells in a sand
that was indicated from open hole logs to be oil-bearing in Well 1 and
water-bearing in Wells 2 and 3. Geological mapping suggests that they are
in a continuous reservoir and that there should be an oil – water contact
Wells 2 and 3 below the bottom of Well 1.
Unfortunately, no fluid samples were obtained with any of the formation
tests.
Use the following data to answer the following questions:
• Which wells are in hydraulic communication?
• What contacts are present in any of the wells?
• What is the insitu density of the oil, and of the water?
Example
Solution

OWC = 6179 ft
Solution
Thank YOU

You might also like