SHAVONDA J ALLEN
St. Louis M0 (63111)
November 29, 2024
ATTN: CFO
Ameren MISSOURI
Michael L. Moehn
1901 Chouteau Ave.
St.louis Mo. 63103
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE
Dear Michael L. Moehn
“I accept the attached charge for value and return it for value discharged per Public Policy Insurance
Bond HJR 192 of 1933 and UCC 10 – 104 and 1 – 104 which is my congressional stipulated Right.”
The United States, Inc. created a Tacit Mortgage on my private property without my knowledge or
consent and is using it as collateral for borrowing loans of credit and money substitutes from the non-
federal Federal Reserve Bank.
Under the laws of equity and the US Constitution, The United States, Inc. cannot take private property
for public use and put it at risk as collateral for loans without just compensation and without providing
a remedy for the recovery of occurred interest lawfully due to me for the risk of its use of my assets
and wealth.
The provisions of this remedy are found in public policy HJR 192 of 1933 known as Public Law 73 - 10,
which suspended the gold standard and exempted U.S. citizens from paying their debts since the
means of paying debts was taken away from them in 1933 and replaced with money substitutes that
discharge debts in lieu of payment.
Public policy insurance bond HJR 192 of 1933 is a superior bond that provides a remedy for victims of
President Roosevelt’s fraud, unlawful conversion of their credit, and treason, and for Congress’s
complicity in these crimes. This unlawful conversion of credit created the exemption upon which these
debt write-off and discharge is based because of the 1933 bankruptcy of the corporate United States,
which exempts Congress from charges of treason against the United States and indemnifies me and
other citizens for their loss.
Your invoice is a negative charge to the debtor my ens legis (government-created) strawman but a
positive charge to me, a Secured Party creator of the corporate United States.
Everything in commerce, under the UCC, is reserved. A bill to your debtor (which is my straw man) is
an offer of his credit to me, a Secured Party Creditor of the corporate United States.
I am accepting his credit and returning it to you as a mutual offset-created exemption exchange to
settle your charge against his account.
My endorsement of your presentment converts it into a money order promissory note that discharges
your charge against my straw man with my mutual set-off credit exemption exchange per public policy
insurance bond HJR 192 of 1933.
Your presentment (bill) is a demand for payment in lawful money of account of the United States
postponed to when such lawful money is restored to circulation.
When Uncle Sam prints a $20 dollar bill, that bill must be paid by the corporation United Stated upon
demand.
Secured party creditors of the corporate United States can tender a mutual offset credit exemption
exchange to fulfill his straw man's obligation to pay with his private personal credit.
By accepting substitute dollar bills in lieu of money, we loan our private credit to the United States.
Therefore we are to be paid back the corresponding Dollar for dollar portions of our private credit on
demand.
Actual income can be immediately added as an asset to an existing account because actual income is
accountable as soon as it is tendered and received instead of when collected.
When a secured party creditor of the corporate United States purchases or subscribes to something
that he needs his mutual offset credit exemption exchange will discharge his obligation to pay in lieu
of Federal Reserve notes for no real money exists with which we can pay.
The United States has a priority obligation to the secured party creditors of the corporate United
States and a secondary obligation to the non-federal Federal Reserve Bank for its obligation to
compensate its secured party creditors for its use of Federal Reserve notes instead of cash.
Commercial redemption is a legal administrative remedy provided by Congress on June 5th, 1933 via
HJR 192 to exempt Congress from charges of Treason (it's their law, not mine).
The Collective Entity Rule makes a clear distinction between a natural person created by God and a
fictional person created by the state.
The Collective Entity Rule was first articulated in Hale v. Hale, 201 US 43, 26 S.Ct. 370, 50 L.Ed. 652.
“The innocent individual who is harmed by and the abuse of governmental authority is assured that
he will be compensated for his injury.”
This is an Administrative Contract Remedy. It is not a tendering payment.
There is no money to pay anything. Contracts are already in place in the background of the state. I am
accepting your presentment and authorizing you to set off and discharge the debt with said credit.
There is no evidence refuting the statements made in this notice of acceptance for value, and the
undersigned believes that no such evidence exists.
If you wish to dispute this notice of information, do not hesitate to timely reply in writing within the
next two weeks.
In witness hereof, I certify on penalties of perjury that all the statements made above or true, correct,
and complete and not intended to mislead.
Very truly,
Allen, Shavonda-Juaiez
Agent
