Curing Literature
Curing Literature
www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa
Abstract
Resin transfer molding (RTM) is a widely used manufacturing technique of composite parts. Proper selection of processing parameters is
critical in order to produce successful molding and to obtain a good part. Notably, when thermosetting resins are processed, the shrinkage that
results from resin polymerization increases the complexity of the problem. Numerical prediction of internal stresses during composite
manufacturing has three objectives: (1) to improve knowledge about the process; (2) to analyze the effects of processing parameters on the
mechanical integrity of the part; and (3) to validate the principles of thermal optimization. This investigation aims to predict residual stresses
and part deformation (i.e. warpage) in thin and thick composites. Accurate characterization of materials is essential for effective numerical
analysis of phenomena which determine the generation of processing stresses. For this purpose, a reaction kinetics model of the resin is
presented, together with a description of mechanical properties as a function of the degree of polymerization and glass transition temperature.
A linear model is used to predict volume changes in glass–polyester composites. A finite difference analysis is used to simulate the effect of
thermal and rheological changes during the processing of sample plates. Classical laminate theory is applied to calculate the internal stresses
that result from processing conditions. These stresses are compared to determine different curing strategies for thick composite parts. Finally,
a thermal optimization algorithm is applied to demonstrate the advantages of transient heating and cooling, to minimize processing stresses
and avoid thermal degradation of the material or composite delamination.
q 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: B. Cure behaviour; B. Residual/internal stress; B. Thermomechanical; C. Numerical analysis; E. Resin transfer moulding (RTM)
is the simplest way to compute internal stresses during Both models depend on fiber volume fractions, temperature
processing, viscoelastic effects and glass transition of the and degree of polymerization. A methodology based on
resin limit the accuracy of calculations. Viscoelastic Classical Laminated Plate Theory (CLT) [25] is developed to
modeling [8,11–13,17] is well suited for material charac- predict residual stresses during the cure of composite
terization of relaxation and glass transition effects. Never- laminates. The thermo-chemical model predicts the tem-
theless, the requirement of time integrals and close loop perature and degree of polymerization through the thickness
iterations make these models difficult to implement in of the part. The mechanical model (based on CLT) evaluates
numerical optimization schemes, which require a large the through-thickness strain and stresses as a function of the
number of iterative calculations. To simplify this problem thermo-chemical evolution of the material. On one hand,
and to avoid time integration, some authors [24] have differential dilatation of the plies generates thermal stresses.
considered the existence of a ‘free-stress’ temperature On the other hand, differences in the polymerization degree
(i.e. the temperature at which the composite would reach a result in a non-uniform shrinkage of the polymer matrix and
‘stress-free’ state). Another possibility, still accurate and create residual stresses of chemical origin.
without requiring excessive computational time, consists of The former thermo-chemical and mechanical models
modeling mechanical properties in their unrelaxed and fully enable processing stresses to be calculated and compared
relaxed stages [17], where a function of the glass transition for three different curing strategies through the thickness of
temperature describes the phase transformation. the composite laminate: (1) outside-to-inside cure; (2)
Various researchers have conducted numerical predic- inside-to-outside cure; and (3) one-side cure. First, the
tions of the composite curing stresses using analytical curing and cooling of asymmetrical thin laminates is
equations or finite element (FE) formulations. Svanberg investigated. Predictions of warpage for a series of thin
et al. [27,28] developed a simplified, mechanical constitutive plate samples have been validated through experiment.
model applicable to homogenized composites during resin Next, the analysis of processing stresses is carried out for
cure. The model replaced the viscoelastic time dependence thick composite plates. The advantage and drawbacks of
by a path dependence on the state variables, namely strain, three possible curing scenarios are compared and the best
degree of cure and temperature. The model was also heating strategy is identified. Finally, a thermal optimiz-
implemented in a general purpose FE software program ation algorithm illustrates the time gains of more optimized
and verified against analytical test cases. Based on the simple heating and cooling temperature profiles. This minimizes
beam bending test, Saham et al. [29] conducted experiments processing stresses and at the same time material thermal
to monitor the evolution of residual stresses in epoxy degradation and/or composite delamination.
compounds for electronic packaging applications. The
authors explained how the relationship between the stresses
evaluated and various curing phenomena such as polymer
cross-linking and temperature differentials. Di Francia et al. 2. Thermo-mechanical analysis
[30] used the single-fiber pull-out test to evaluate the
deformation of an adhesively bonded composite patch In a non-isothermal RTM injection, the mold is typically
during cure. Experimental studies were also conducted at a higher temperature than the resin and fibers.
using a three-point bending fixture, showing a good Temperature variations in the part are produced by the
match with analytical predictions. Fernlund et al. [31] heat exchanged between the preform, resin and mold walls
implemented a FE approach to compute curing stresses of during resin injection. Sometimes, curing is affected by the
laminated carbon composites in ‘L’ and ‘C’ shapes. A heat transfer in the cavity during the filling stage. However,
validation with experimental results showed that the when thermal effects during filling have little effect on the
approach presented provided a good numerical prediction initial polymerization degree of the resin, it is possible to
of curing stresses. Although the FE solutions seems to be decouple filling and curing as two distinct stages of the
accurate to calculate the stain–stress behavior during resin manufacturing process. In order to verify if the chemical
cure for composites parts of complex shape, these methods reaction can be omitted during mold-filling, a non-dimen-
require excessive computer time for cure cycle optimization. sional number called the gelling ratio (Ge) is used. This
In this sense, analytical solutions of simple shape composites number conveys the time required to fill up the mold
seem to be more appropriate for implementation in looping (injection time) with the time needed to cure the part
optimizations. (reaction time). For a small Ge, it is possible to decouple the
The purpose of this paper is to show how a numerical curing process from the filling stage. In the case of
model of trough-thickness heat transfer can assist in finding polyester-based resin systems, the free radicals generated
optimal temperature cycles. First, the physical phenomena are initially deactivated by reacting with an inhibitor, so the
that govern curing are presented together with the thermal Ge can be defined as the ratio of the filling time (tf) over the
equation that models the heat exchanged between the part inhibition time (tin) at mold temperature. From this
and its surroundings. Models are presented for volume definition, a Ge smaller than unity means that the curing
changes and material behavior during composite processing. process can be decoupled from mold filling, which is
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 809
Fig. 2. Comparison of DSC measurements of the resin degree of polymerization with predictions of the resin cure kinetics model: DSC experiments from room
temperature to 180 8C at heating ramps between 5 and 35 8C/min show good agreement with model predictions.
by a time integral of the thermal history [16]. induction reference temperature. The weight function
ðt K4(Id) of Eq. (3) is then set to 1 when the induction time
T is zero. Measured versus predicted induction times are
Id ðT; tÞ Z trefK exp KCind ind K 1 dt;
0 T compared in Fig. 3 for a wide range of curing temperatures
( (6) of the AOC resin T580-63. Note that for low processing
Z 0 if Id O 0 temperatures (i.e. less than 60 8C), larger induction periods
K4 ðId Þ Z
Z 1 if Id % 0 (w20 min) are required before polymerization begins. The
ultimate polymerization degree may not exceed 40%. The
where tref, Cind and Tind are fitting coefficients called, resin manufacturer recommends that composite parts made
respectively, reference time, induction constant and with this resin system should be processed within the range
Fig. 3. Maximum degree of resin polymerization and induction time as a function of curing temperature: these results were obtained from DSC measurements
data after applying the conversion methodology.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 811
of 90–120 8C. This will decrease the processing time and below) and two functions to account for the dependency on
also reach an adequate level of polymerization. the polymerization degree (Fr(a)) and glass transition
temperature (Wr(Tg)) [17]
2.4. Thermo-chemical dependence of mechanical properties Er ðT; aÞ Z Eagp ðTÞ C ½Ec ðTÞ K Eagp ðTÞFr ðaÞWr ðTg Þ (7)
Fig. 4. Comparison of the resin Young’s modulus (E 0 ) and degree of polymerization during a specified curing cycle: E 0 is measured with a DMA while the
degree of polymerization comes from DSC measurements.
812 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 5. A non-linear correlation between E 0 and the degree of polymerization is observed for the polyester resin tested: DMA measurements of E 0 are plotted as
a function of the degree of polymerization obtained from DSC results.
transition and after gel point. Fig. 6 shows the temperature relatively good agreement with experimental data for all
shift factor of fully relaxed coefficients for polymerization tested samples.
degrees above AGP. Glass transition temperatures are also In the case of shear properties, two possible approaches
depicted in the same graphic, showing that the initial glass may be used. In the first case, Levitsky and Shaffer [11]
transition Tg0 stands around 55 8C, while the fully cured assumed the plain strain bulk modulus to be constant during
transition TgN is at about 110 8C (TgN was practically taken as cure, so that the elastic moduli and Poisson’s ratio vary as
the glass transition temperature for 95% of total resin the part cures. In the second case, Bogetti and Gillespie [8]
conversion). Fig. 7 shows DMA measurements of the elastic assumed that Poisson’s ratio remains constant during
modulus for several resin specimens cured at different processing. They found that differences in the resin
polymerization degrees between aagp and ault. The predic- Poisson’s ratio during cure have no significant influence
tions of the proposed thermo-chemical model exhibit a on the properties of the macroscopic composite, on
Fig. 6. Temperature shift factor as a function of temperature for various degrees of polymerization: the glass transition temperature Tg is also drawn as a
function of the degree of polymerization.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 813
Fig. 7. Comparison of the model predictions and DMA measurements of Young’s modulus E 0 for partially and fully cured resin samples (the lines present
model predictions).
process-induced strains and on residual stresses. Both volume fractions Vf in the two principal fiber directions
models predicted nearly identical values of elastic and
shear moduli. Poisson’s ratio is also expected to relax to i Vf ðEfi K Er ðT; aÞÞ Er ðT; aÞ
Ecomp Z C Eagp ðTÞ
w0.5 as the thermosetting polymer approaches the rubbery 1 C Ai expðBi TÞ Er ðT; 1Þ
state, nevertheless it was found by O’Brien et al. [12] that
the effect on the shear modulus is relatively minor. with i Z 1; 2
According to these researchers, variations of Poisson’s (12)
ratio do not play an important role. For that reason, in
where Ai and Bi are fitting constants for each material
this investigation a constant value nrZ0.35 was used, as
direction (iZ1,2). Indexes r, f and comp stand for resin,
measured at room temperature for a fully cured sample. The
fiber and composite, respectively.
instantaneous resin shear modulus during cure is based on
Two reinforcing materials have been used in this study to
the classical relationship for isotropic materials
analyze thermal effects on processing stresses: a continuous
glass random mat U101 from Vetrotex and one bi-directional
Er ðT; aÞ balanced non-crimp glass fabric NCS 82620 from J.B.
Gr ðT; aÞ Z (11) Martin. Fig. 8 shows measurement results of Young’s
2ð1 C nr Þ 1 2
modulus in both directions (Ecomp , Ecomp ) for a composite
plate made with NCS-82620 bidirectional fabric (VfZ42%).
For the partially and fully cured samples, the mechanical
model approaches the experimental curves at temperatures
2.5. Composite effective mechanical properties
close to Tg. Young modulus of composite specimens with
these materials were measured and fitted by Eq. (12). As
The effective, homogeneous mechanical properties of the
depicted in Fig. 9, between two and three fiber volume
composite laminate are highly dependent on those of the
contents were tested for each material. Note that the rule of
matrix and reinforcement, as well as on the fiber volume
mixture used here may be accurate only around measured
fraction. The thermal and mechanical properties of the
values of fiber volume content. The range of validity
reinforcement may be considered constant, independent of
considered for the materials tested is presented in Fig. 10.
temperature and of the polymerization degree. But, accord-
ing to the models previously presented matrix properties
vary during processing. Although Whitney’s self-consistent, 2.6. Volume changes
micro-mechanical model [13] was initially used to deter-
mine reinforcement properties, they were over-estimated at Some experimental studies have been conducted to gain
temperatures close to the matrix glass transition. Empirical insight on the volumetric changes that occur during
models were then used to estimate the composite elastic thermosetting polymer processing. Hill et al. [14] measured
1;2
modulus Ecomp as a function of temperature T and fiber the volume changes of unsaturated polyesters during resin
814 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 8. Measured and predicted Young’s modulus E 0 in both directions for a composite with volume fraction VfZ42% of NCS-82620 for fully and partially
cured samples.
cure due to variations of temperature and degree of The first term on the right hand side represents the bulk
polymerization. Hill proposed that the overall volumetric thermal expansion/contraction contribution, which can be
changes of a thermoset resin during cure be considered as a expressed by
combination of thermal expansion or contraction and
1 dV
polymerization shrinkage as follows
Vo dt Thermal Contribution
1 dV dT dT (14)
Z bgel C½ðbcured Kbgel Þa
Vo dt overall dt dt
1 dV 1 dV bcured ; bgel Z a0 Cb0 T
Z K
Vo dt thermal contribution Vo dt polymerization shrinkage where bgel and bcured are the coefficients of thermal
(13) expansion (CTE) of the gelled and fully cured resin,
Fig. 9. Measured and predicted E 0 for different fiber volume fractions Vf of fully cured composite samples made of NCS-82620 fabric and U101 mat.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 815
Fig. 10. Rule of mixtures for E 0 as a function of fiber volume fraction Vf: regions A and B represent the experimental domain of validity of Vf for U101 and NCS
materials, respectively.
respectively. These coefficients are assumed to vary linearly shrinkage lchem for the fully cured sample was about 7%.
with temperature, and a0 and b0 are the constants of the
1 dV da
linear fitting. Eq. (14) means that the thermal expansion or Z lchem (15)
Vo dt polymerization shrinkage dt
contraction is assumed to vary monotonically with the
polymerization degree a. The second term on the right hand
side of Eq. (13) represents the contribution of chemical 2.7. Longitudinal and transverse coefficient of thermal
shrinkage (i.e. the volume shrinkage induced by the resin expansions (CTE)
cross-linking during polymerization). Resin shrinkage was
measured with a thermomechanical analyzer (TMA 2940 The CTE of pure resin samples and composite plates
from TA Instruments) as a function of the degree of were also measured with the thermo-mechanical analyzer.
polymerization. As observed in Fig. 11, the linear As presented in Fig. 12, thermal expansions of uncured resin
relationship of Eq. (15) was derived experimentally for samples (i.e. for aZ0), partially cured (for aZ0.45 and
the polyester resin tested. The total polymerization 0.80) and fully cured ones have been experimentally
Fig. 11. Linearization of chemical shrinkage induced by resin polymerization (TMA versus DSC measurements).
816 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 12. Coefficients of thermal expansion for partially and fully cured resin samples (from TMA measurements).
determined. During curing, the CTE of the resin decreases directions (i.e. longitudinal, transverse and through-thick-
almost in proportion with the degree of polymerization. ness). The model follows the rule of mixture
Based on this assumption, experimental data can be fitted by
a bilinear function of temperature and degree of polymeriz- CTEdcompZ CTEr ðT; aÞð1 K Vf Þ C CTEdfiber Vf
(17)
ation. Then, the resin CTE can be written as a rule of
where d Z L; T; and T T
mixture between the uncured (After Gel Point) and cured
CTE
2.8. Strain–stress modeling
CTEr ðT; aÞ Z CTEagp ðTÞð1 K aÞ
^ C CTEcured ðTÞa^ (16)
The present analysis assumes that the Classical Lami-
where a^ is the normalized degree of cure given by Eq. (9). nated Theory (CLT) is applicable to the infinitesimal region
Composite samples of NCS 82620 and U101 reinforce- of a composite unit cell. By introducing the expressions of
ments were also measured (see Fig. 13) in the three principal thermo-chemically dependent mechanical properties into
Fig. 13. Coefficients of thermal expansion for fully cured composite samples of NCS-82620 fabric: d1 and d2 indicate the principal planar directions of the
fabric, while T refers to the transverse direction.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 817
Fig. 14. Stacking sequence for thin plates: the number of NCS plies was Fig. 15. Warpage appearing in thin composite plates after manufacture due
changed while mold thickness remained constant; two plies of U101 were to unbalanced lay-up: total deflection in the plate center is the sum of
used for all the test samples. longitudinal and transverse deflections.
818 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 16. Measure of typical plate deflection during cooling from above the glass transition temperature. The sample has two plies of NCS-82620 fabric and two
plies of U101 mat. While temperature decreases from 140 8C to room temperature, plate deflection increases from 5 to 17 mm.
the experimental values. After demolding, a number of Transducer (LVDT) was placed to measure the deflection
plates were re-heated and maintained during 20 min at of the plates at the gravity center. While sample
150 8C, which is above their glass transition temperatures, temperature decreases, the deflection in the center
so as to allow relaxation of the matrix. Once processing increases from 5 to 17 mm.
and demolding stresses have relaxed, the flat plates were The measured temperatures were then used as thermal
cooled to room temperature. As illustrated in Fig. 16, boundary conditions for the thermo-mechanical model. The
temperatures at different thickness and length positions deflection of the specimens was calculated by solving
were recorded during cooling. The bottom, mid-plane and iteratively Eqs. (2), (12), (17) and (18). The results of the
top temperatures decreased uniformly enough to neglect proposed model are compared to experimental values in
transverse thermal effects. A Linear Variable Displacement Fig. 17. A minimum of three measures were carried out for
Fig. 17. Comparison of measured plate deflection during cooling with the numerical prediction of the thermo-mechanical model: three measurements were
performed for each plate; the two samples show a good agreement with predicted values.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 819
Fig. 18. Two examples of matrix cracking and delamination during processing of thick composite plates. Defects appear commonly in thick composites
processed at high mold temperature.
820 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 20. Numerical calculation of temperature and Young’s modulus E 0 for a 15 mm thick composite cured at a mold temperature of 120 8C: high exothermic
temperature peaks are observed.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 821
Fig. 21. Through-thickness calculation of polymerization degrees during outside-to-inside cure of a 15 mm thick composite: A and B denote the AGP level at
the surface and middle thickness, respectively.
Note this latter disadvantage, however, can be overcome through a gelled material. A one-side cure progression can
with a post-cure. be achieved when processing the 15 mm thick composite at
different temperatures on the upper and lower mold
4.3. One-side cure surfaces. Simulation results are presented in Figs. 26 and
27 for mold temperatures of 70 and 90 8C on the top and
The above disadvantages compel us to consider a third bottom surfaces, respectively. The temperature profiles of
case: it consists of having the curing front move from one Fig. 26 show that curing temperature can be higher without
surface of the part to the opposite one. In such a one-side really increasing the exothermic peak. This results in a
cure strategy, the generation of processing stresses can be significant reduction in curing time. The internal stresses
explained by simulating the displacement of the curing front calculated for this processing strategy are drawn in Fig. 27.
Fig. 22. Calculated stresses developed during outside-to-inside cure: internal stresses rapidly develop during cure after 10 min., due to resin shrinkage in the core.
822 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 23. Through-thickness chemical strains induced by resin polymerization shrinkage for an outside-to-inside cure: at about 10.7 min, fast curing of the core
generates high chemical strains.
The major disadvantage of the one-side cure strategy is the mechanical performance, an optimized processing cycle can
resulting unsymmetrical pattern of residual stresses. It can now be outlined. In order to minimize the internal stresses
lead to deformations and geometric distortion of the generated during resin cure, ideally, the degree of
composite part. polymerization through the thickness should remain con-
stant at each instant. In fact, minimizing chemically induced
strain gradients between plies will result in a net reduction
5. Optimization of cure cycle of curing stresses. In the same way, if through-thickness
thermal gradients are minimized during cure and subsequent
Based on the understanding of different curing strategies cooling, residual stresses will also be decreased and
previously examined and their effects on part distortion and processing defects avoided.
Fig. 24. Numerical calculation of temperature and through-thickness degree of polymerization for an inside-to-outside cure: the thick plate is processed at a
temperature of 70 8C.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 823
Fig. 25. Computed internal stresses during inside-to-outside cure (plate processed at 70 8C): while no stress develops during the cure phase, contraction stresses
appear in the core due to thermal variations.
In this study, an optimization methodology based on thermal and curing gradients. A second heating ramp is
genetic algorithms was used to determine the mold necessary to successfully cure the part up to the desired final
temperatures that could minimize residual stresses and polymerization degree, while avoiding high exothermic
processing time [26]. Figs. 28 and 29 present calculations temperature peaks. The internal stresses calculated during
for the same 15 mm thick composite plates processed this the optimized cure cycle are drawn in Fig. 29 and illustrate
time with optimized mold temperatures. Fig. 28 shows how curing and cooling stresses are significantly reduced by
numerical results of internal temperature and degree of this approach. These results demonstrate that numerical
polymerization. Initial mold overheating helps to decrease optimization of the thermal boundary condition can be a
processing time while minimizing through-thickness useful tool to minimize residual stresses, and especially in
Fig. 26. Calculated temperature and degree of polymerization during one-side cure: resin polymerization evolves from the hot to cold surface, resulting in a
high exothermic peak in the regions close to the cold surface.
824 E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826
Fig. 27. Numerical internal stresses during one-side cure: internal stresses grow up in the regions close to the cold surface during resin polymerization (after
around 24 min).
the case of thick composites increase mechanical perform- two reinforcing materials (NCS-82620 fabric and U101
ance of the cured part while minimizing processing time. mat) embedded in a polyester resin (T580-63 from AOC). A
kinetic model, including inhibition times induced by
inhibitor decomposition, is also proposed to describe the
6. Summary resin polymerization during processing. The energy
equation was solved by finite differences through the
In this paper, models are proposed to describe changes of thickness of the part. The analysis of process-induced
composite mechanical properties as a function of (1) fiber stresses in the composite is based on Classical Laminated
volume content; (2) temperature; and (3) degree of Theory. Asymmetrically layered thin plates were first
polymerization of the resin. These models were used for processed to validate the thermo-mechanical model by
Fig. 28. Numerical calculation of temperature and degree of cure for an optimized curing cycle: initial mold overheating and appropriate heating ramps result in
a quasi-constant through-thickness progression of polymerization and minimization of temperature gradients.
E. Ruiz, F. Trochu / Composites: Part A 36 (2005) 806–826 825
Fig. 29. Calculation of through-thickness internal stresses during optimized curing cycle: low residual stresses are found after processing while final
polymerization degree is maximized.
[8] Bogetti T, Gillespie J. Process-induced stress and deformation in [20] Han CD, Lem K-W. Chemorheology of thermosetting resins. I.
thick-sectioned thermoset composite laminates. J Comps Mater 1992; Chemorheology and cure kinetics of unsaturated polyester resin.
26(5):626–60. J Appl Polym Sci 1983;28:3155–83.
[9] Golestanian H, El-Gizawy S. Cure dependent lamina stiffness [21] Stevenson JF. Innovation in polymer processing: molding, com-
matrices of resin transfer molded composite parts with woven fiber pression molding. S.L.:l’auteur; 1996, 600 p. [ISBN 3-446-17433-8].
mats. J Comps Mater 1997;31(23):2402–23. [22] Yi S, Hilton HH. Effects of thermo-mechanical properties of
[10] Osswald TA, Sun EM, Tseng S-C. Experimental verification on composites on viscosity, temperature and degree of cure. J Comps
simulating shrinkage and warpage of thin compression moulded SMC Mater 1998;32(7):600–22.
parts. Polym Polym Comps 1994;2(3):187A–198. [23] Bogetti TA, Gillespie JW. Process-induced stress and deformation in
[11] Levitsky M, Shaffer BM. Thermal stresses in chemical hardening thick-section thermoset composite laminate. J Comps Mater 1992;
elastic media with application to the molding process. J Appl Mech 26(5):626–60.
1974;41:647–51. [24] Djokic D, Johnston A, Rogers A, Lee-Sullivan P, Mrad N. Residual
[12] O’Brien DJ, Mather P, White SR. Viscoelastic properties of an epoxy stress development during the composite patch bonding process:
resin during cure. J Comps Mater 2001;35(10):883–904. measurement and modelling. Comps Part A 2002;33(2):277–88.
[13] Whitney JM. Elastic moduli of unidirectional composites with [25] Daniel IM, Ishai O. Engineering mechanics of composite materials.
Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994 [450 p. ISBN 0195075064].
anisotropic filaments. J Comps Mater 1967;1:188.
[26] Ruiz E, Trochu T,. Comprehensive thermal optimisation of liquid
[14] Hill R, Muzumar S, Lee L. Analysis of volumetric changes of
composite molding to reduce cycle time and processing stresses.
unsaturated polyester resin during curing. Polym Eng Sci 1995;
Polym Compos 2004 in press.
35(10):852–9.
[27] Svanberg JM, Holmberg JA. Prediction of shape distortions part I. FE-
[15] Louchard S. Guide de mesures DSC et de calcul des modèles
implementation of a path depending constitutive model. Comps Part
cinétiques de cuisson de résines thermodurcissables. Rapport de stage
A 2004;35(6):711–21.
présenté au CRASP.: Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal; 2002. 73 p..
[28] Svanberg JM, Holmberg JA. Prediction of shape distortions part II.
[16] Sobotka V. Détermination des paramètres thermophysiques et Experimental validation and analysis of boundary conditions. Comps
cinétiques d’une résine polyester insaturée. Rapport de stage présenté Part A 2004;35(6):723–34.
au CRASP.: Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal; 2001. 75 p. [29] Sham M-L, Kim S. Evolution of residual stresses in modified epoxy
[17] Edu Ruiz, Trochu F. Thermal and mechanical properties during cure resins for electronic packaging applications. Comps Part A 2004;
of glass–polyester RTM composites: elastic vs. viscoelastic modeling. 35(5):537–46.
in press. [30] DiFrancia C, Ward TC, Claus R. The single-fibre pull-out test. 2:
[18] Tutorial on polymer composite molding from Michigan State Quantitative evaluation of an uncatalysed TGDDM/DDS epoxy cure
University. http://islnotes.cps.msu.edu/trp/intro.html (web page con- study. Comps Part A 1996;27(8):613–24.
sulted 2002-05-12). [31] Fernlund G, Rahman N, Courdji R, Bresslauer M, Poursartip A,
[19] Yousefi-Moshirabad A. Cure analysis of promoted polyester and Willden K, Nelson K. Experimental and numerical study of the effect
vinylester reinforced composites and heat transfer in RTM Molds. of cure cycle, tool surface, geometry, and lay-up on the dimensional
PhD Thesis. Department of Chemical Engineering, École Polytechni- fidelity of autoclave-processed composite parts. Comps Part A 2002;
que de Montréal; April 1996. 33(3):341–51.