0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views1 page

Report

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views1 page

Report

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FINAL YEAR PROJECT MARKING SCHEME

PROJECT REPORT
PROGRAMME : DURATION
COURSE:
PROJECT TITLE: ASSESSMENT
STUDENT NAME :
30%
SUPERVISORS:
Basic Factor / Obtain Basic
No. Criteria Full Mark
Mark FP Mark
Introduction
i) Introduction is not significant to the topic 0
1 ii) Introduction is significant but not well described. 1 0.90
iii) Introduction clearly described but general. 2
iv) Gives a specific background and highlights the problems. 3
Literature review
i) No related work found. 0
2 ii) Insufficient related work found but with limited explanation. 1 1.80
iii) Sufficient amount of related work found and clearly explained. 2
iv) A lot of related work have been found and clearly explained. 3
Project methodology
i) Project methodology is not acceptable. 0
3 ii) Project methodology is acceptable but details are fairly covered 1 1.80
iii) Project methodology is acceptable but some details are missing. 2
iv) Correct project methodology have been identified and already applied to implement the project 3
Discussion on result/work
i) No evidence of any work being done or plagiarized outcomes shown. 0
4 ii) Poor results/works have been done. 1 1.80
iii) Satisfactory results/works have been done. 2
iv) Obtain good outcomes/results. 3
Conclusion and Recommendation
i) Conclusion and recommendation were not defined and explained. 0
5 ii) Conclusion and recommendation were satisfactory. 1 0.90
iii) Conclusion and recommendation were good. 2
iv) Conclusion and recommendation were excellent and related to the project. 3
Writing skills
i) Report is too difficult to understand or plagiarized work was presented. 0
6 ii) Report not well written with many grammatical errors. 1 0.45
iii) Report well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some grammatical errors. 2
iv) Report very clear and sentences easy to understand. Minor or no grammatical errors. 3
Report format
i) Not follow standard report format. 0
7 ii) Some standard format used. 1 0.45
iii) Report follows standard format but not well organised. 2
iv) Report is well structured and follows standard format. 3
Relevant attachment
i) No supporting documents 0
8 ii) Attach a few supporting documents, drawing, diagram. 1 0.45
iii) Attach more supporting documents, drawing, diagram but some of them not related to project. 2
iv) Attach more supporting documents, drawing, diagram related to project. 3
References
i) No reference was presented. 0
9 ii) Poor reference sources and incorrect referencing format. 1 0.45
iii) Acceptable reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. 2
iv) Good reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. 3
Total Marks 9.0

Total Marks = (Total Marks/27) * 100

COMMENTS:

SIGNATURE & COP

DATE:

You might also like