IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

FIR NO:-0898/2015

PS:-NAJAFGARH

U/S:-498-A/406/313/325/34 IPC

INDEX

S.NO. PARTICULARS PG. CT.FEE

NO.
1. Notice of Motion
2. Urgent Application
3. Memo of parties
4. List of dates and events
5. 1stApplication for
Anticipatory Bail under
section 438 of Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the
accused namely Atul
kumar Rana along with
supporting affidavit
6. Attested Copy of the of
the order of dismissal of
the Anticipatory Bail
 dated 19.03.2016 along
with true typed copy.
7. Copy of F.I.R. No
0898/15 P.S. Najafgarh
along with true typed
and translated version.
8. Copy of the SSP report
along with true typed
copy and translated
version
9. Application under
section 482 for
exemption from filling
certified copies of the
annexures.
10. Copy of ICICI Bank
Statement of Petitioner
11. True Type order of Ld.
District and Principal
Judge, Dwarka Court,
copy dated 02.07.2015
12. Vakalatnama

DATE:01.04.2016
DELHI THROUGH

Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy

Advocates
Ch. No. 167, Civil Wing,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Ph.: +91-9810229959
Email id: onkar.roy@live.com
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

NOTICE OF MOTION

To

STATE

Take Notice that the accompanying petition

will be listed before Court on 07.04.2016 at 10.30

AM in the forenoon, or so soon thereafter as may

be convenient to the Court. Please acknowledge

the advance copies of the accompanying

application as per rules.

APPLICANT

DATE:01.04.2016

DELHI THROUGH

Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy

Advocates
 Ch. No. 167, Civil Wing,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Ph.: +91-9810229959
Email id: onkar.roy@live.com
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

URGENT APPLICATION

The Deputy Registrar

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
Sir,

Will you kindly treat the accompanying

application as urgent as per the rules and

regulations of this Hon’ble Court?

THE GROUNDS OF URGENCY ARE:

That the application is for grant of anticipatory

bail as the applicant/accused is apprehending

arrest.

Hence the urgency.

APPLICANT
DATE:01.04.2016
DELHI THROUGH
 Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy
Advocates

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

MEMO OF PARTIES

Atul kumar Rana

S/o Sh. Raja Ram Singh Rana
R/o: 128/1040, Y Block,
Kidwai Nagar, PS Naubasta,
Kanpur City (U.P.) …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi …..RESPONDENT

DATE:01.04.2016
DELHI THROUGH

Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy

Advocate
Ch. No. 167, Civil Wing,
 Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Ph.: +91-9810229959
Email id: onkar.roy@live.com
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE ..RESPONDENT

LIST OF DATES & EVENTS

28.10.2007 God Bharai Rasam of Complainant

30.10.2007 Innova Car booked by Petitioner

30.11.2007 Marriage between Applicant and

complainant Solemanised at

Najafgarh, New Delhi.

26.03.2010 first PCR Call made by Petitioner

against complainant.

20/05/2010 Petitioner brought complainant

back to matrimonial house.

04/03/2011 Baby Girl Child Born

05/12/2011 Complainant left the company of

petitioner
00/06/2012 Panchayat & Mediation held and

Complainant came back with

petitioner.

08/02/2013 Complainant along with Baby girl

left to Parental Home in New Delhi

23/02/2013 Divorce Case filed by the Petitioner

in Kanpur

20/03/2013 Complaint filed against Petitioner

at CAW Cell Nanakpura, New Delhi

by complainant

19/03/2014 After Mediation Petitioner took

complainant back home

13/10/2014 Hon’ble Supreme Court Transfer

the Divorce petition filed by

petitioner from Kanpur to Delhi

26/07/2014 Complaint filed by complainant’s

father before SHO Anand parvat

against petitioner and his family

28/07/2014 Complaint filed by complainant

before SHO Najafgarh against

petitioner and his family

07/02/2015 Alleged date of mis-carrage

09/02/2015 Treatment of complainant and

medicine were given at Gandhi

Nursing Home, Uttam Nagar, Delhi

17/07/2015 Alleged date of incident on which

present complaint has been made

by the complainant

28/07/2015 Complaint at CAW Cell by

complainant against petitioner and

his family.

13/11/2015 FIR No. 0898/2015 registered

12/01/2016 1st application u/s 438 for

anticipatory bail moved by

petitioner

13/01/2016 Matter listed before Ld. ASJ Shri

Vikas Dhull, Dwarka Court.

15/01/2016 Matter referred to Mediation Cell

16/02/2016 Mediation failed

02/03/2016 Documents of medicals sent for

verification
19/03/2016 Anticipatory Bail Dismissed by Sh.

Vikas Dhull, Ld. ASJ, Dwarka

Court.

Hence the present application on behalf of the

applicant.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE (Govt. of NCT) ..RESPONDENT

F.I.R. No.: 0898/2015

U/S: 498A/406/313/325/34 IPC
P.S.: Najafgarh

1stAPPLICATION UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.PC

FOR GRANT OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the applicant is innocent person and is

living peacefully at the above mentioned and

having deep roots in the society and having

no criminal antecedent and working there for

his livelihood.

2. That the applicant/accused got married with

Ms Deepika i.e. complainant on 30.11.2007

and out of the said wedlock one girl child

namely Mishthy was born on 04.03.2011,

 who is presently in the custody of the

complainant.

3. That the complainant under the influence and

touts of her parents withdraw herself from

the company of the applicant without any

rhyme and reason and came back to her

parental house and had filed number of false

and frivolous complaints against the

applicant and his family members before

different authorities only to harass,

humiliate, embarrass the entire family before

the whole society and to extort money from

the applicant and his family members. It is

pertinent to mention herewith that a similar

complaint was lodged by a sister of the

complainant against her in laws and

subsequently the family of complainant

agreed to withdraw the complaint after

getting an amount of Rs.14,00,000/- from the

in laws of her daughter. It shows the

preparation, malafide intention, ulterior

motive and tendency of the complainant and

her family members to take undue advantage

 of our legal system and process only to

extort handsome money from their in laws.

4. That it is very much essential and necessary

to mention herewith that the complainant

also moved a false and frivolous complaint

against the father of the applicant, who was

working as Inspector CID, in Anti Corruption

Branch of Uttar Pradesh Police and also on

his all family members only to put pressure

in order to fulfill her ulterior motives which

was only to extort money as mentioned in

above paras. Upon such complaint made by

complainant, a detailed and comprehensive

inquiry was conducted by the concerned

department of U.P police, whereas all the

allegations and charges leveled by the

complainant against the father of the

applicant and his family members were found

wrong, false, meritless and baseless.

5. That the applicant joined the investigation

and process conducted by CAW cell, Dwarka,

Sector-9, New Delhi personally coming from

Kanpur, but to utter shock and surprise for

the applicant no police official was paying

 any heed to the submissions of the applicant

rather the applicant is having every

apprehension that the complainant in

collusion with the police officials conspired

and lodged the present FIR and adopted all

possible means and methods to implicate the

applicant and his family members.

6. That it is also worthwhile to mention herein

that the applicant is residing in Kanpur and

just to harass and humiliate the applicant,

the complainant is misusing the process of

law for fulfilling her ulterior motive.Moreover

she along with her parents are adopting all

measures to put pressure and to implicate

the applicant in false and frivolous cases

only in order to extort money from the

applicant and his family members.

7. That the charges leveled in the FIR are

totally wrong and baseless having no iota of

truth and legs. The marriage between the

complainant and the applicant was happily

consummated and there were no dowry

demand whatsoever as alleged in the FIR

from the complainant and her family

 members. It is worthwhile to mention that the

marriage between the complainant and the

applicant was love cum arrange marriage

and no dowry or demand of such nature was

made either by the applicant or his family

members.

8. That at the time of marriage the vehicle

“Innova Car” which was alleged as Dowry

article in FIR was bought from the hard

earned money of the applicant as the initial

token amount was paid by the applicant and

rest through installments of Rs. 4,00,000

through cheque drawn on ICICI bank from his

account however due to no address proof of

applicant of Delhi, the applicant agreed to

get the registration of vehicle in the name of

the complainant as the complainant is his

wife and had address proof of Delhi. The

applicant herein willing to return the amount

deposited by the complainant to her and

same has been communicated to the

complainant as well as the IO of the case

during CAW cell proceedings.

9. That as alleged in the FIR no physical

beatings were ever given to the complainant

by the applicant or his family members it is

just an imagination only to implicate the

applicant and his family members in false

and frivolous case. Even if such injury as

alleged in FIR had taken place, it could have

taken place at the parental house of the

complainant and no such information has

ever been given to the applicant at any point

of time. Moreover Complainant did not make

any complain to any authority, when such

alleged incident occurred, which itself shows

her malafide intention.

10. That the complainant is working at the

instance of her parents, only to spoil the life

of the applicant who is working as

entrepreneur and running a firm in the name

and style of M/S Misthy Enterprises. It is

also necessary to mention never resided at

the home of applicant with cool and

composed attitude and always shown her

restless and quarrelsome behavior towards

the family of the applicant and never gave

 any respect to the parents of the applicant.

The complainant used to leave the company

of the applicant more often and stayed at her

parental home and also tried to compel/force

the applicant to reside with her parental

home and also pass the whole earnings to

her parents. It is also worthwhile to mention

that the father of the complainant is working

in a private security agency and earns only

to meet his livelihood which creates doubt as

how the amount as alleged in FIR has been

spent by the father of complainant, who is

mere earning hand to mouth.

11. That lastly when the complainant left

the company of the applicant took away all

the jewellery and stridhan along with her and

the applicant also lodged a complaint against

the complainant for the same U/S 200 and

156(3) Cr.p.c., which is pending disposal

before the court of Ld. ACMM Kanpur Court.

12. That all the charges and allegation in

the FIR have no legs to stand before the law

as the same has been created and drafted by

 the complainant on the instance of her

parents only to fulfill the ulterior motives.

13. That the applicant and his family

members made various efforts to bring back

the complainant and to reconcile the matter

but all in vain due to continuous interference

of the family of complainant. Every time

when the applicant made an effort to

reconcile the matter the family of

complainant abused the applicant with filthy

language and threaten the applicant if he

dares to visit the house, they will implicate

him in false and frivolous case.

14. That the complainant in order to

harass, humiliate and blackmail the applicant

and his family failed a false and frivolous

complaint with CAW Cell, Sector-9, Dwarka,

New Delhi, leveling false allegations, without

any iota of truth against the applicant and

others and on the basis of which the above

said FIR has been lodged and after receipt

notice from the cell, the applicant appeared

before them on various occasions and

apprised them the true facts of the matter

 and also requested the said officials to ask

the complainant to join the company of

applicant. However, the officials of CAW Cell

without considering the facts of the matter

referred the matter for the registration of the

FIR and the police has lodged the above said

FIR against the applicant and his family

members.

15. That the present complaint has been

inspired with the motive of greediness and

complainant has lodged the present

complaint just to extract money from the

applicant under the false and frivolous

allegations. The applicant never made any

demand for dowry and neither harassed the

complainant in any manner nor extended any

threats to the complainant or her family

members. There is no truth in the allegations

made by the complainant in the FIR.

16. That the petitioenre got a notice from

PS Najafgarh, in December,2015 which the

petitioner appeared and joined the

investigation thereafter the petitioner has

 been summoned by Crime against Women

Cell, Nanakpura, in which the petitioner has

joined the investigation on each and every

date however, the complainant refused to

change her nature and the same resulted in

failure of Mediation Proceedings before

Crime against Women cell and the

complainant has instructed for the

registration of the FIR against the Petitioner.

Needless to mention that the complainant’s

father was a influential person in the vicinity

of PS Najafgarh and accordingly the

complainant along with her parents have

yielded and put undue pressure upon the

petitioner to succumb to their wishes and too

their line of thinking. Because of the

influence shown by the complainant through

her father the petitioner has strong

apprehension that he would be arrested in

wake of false and frivolous complaint lodged

by complainant against him.

17. That the petitioner and his family

members made various efforts to bring back

the complainant and to reconcile the matter

 and rather took 2-3 times back to her

matrimonial home but all in vain due to

continuous interference of the family of

complainant. Every time when the petitioner

made an effort to reconcile the matter the

family of the complainant abused the petitonr

with filthy language and threaten the

applicant to bow as per the wishes of the

complaiant otherwise the petitioner and his

family members will be implicated in the

false and frivolous matter.

18. The Petitioner moved first Anticipatory

Bail Application , which was listed before the

court of Shri Vikas Dhull, Ld. ASJ, Dwarka

Court, New Delhi who vide order dated 19 th

March,2016 dismissed the same.

19. The Ld. Judge while passing the

impugned order, has mention of facts aliena

to the instant FIR in so far as there is no

allegation of miscarriage of child in the

instant FIR, but has been taken out to be a

ground for dismissal of the Anticipatory Bail

application of the petitioner.

 20. That the Ld. Judge, while passing the

impugned order, has mentioned of facts that

ther are medical documents to show the

miscarriage of the complainant however no

such document brought by the IO and

importantly the version of the complainant in

the present FIR qua miscarriage will expose

the false and fabricated story of the

complainant which has been cooked up to

implicate the petitioner and his family

members in false and frivolous matter by

misusing the process of law.

21. From the contents of the FIR, it is clear that

the same is just in general nature and

moreover entire family members being named

in the present FIR and a bare perusal of the

FIR will expose the falsity of the story of the

complainant. It is pertinent to mention that as

far as wrong medicines are concerned no such

medicines were administered by the petitioner

and rather the complainant herself admitted

that she went to the Sarojini Nursing home at

hospital along with her mother at Kanpur

whereby the doctor opinioned that due to

weekly pregnancy and excessive bleeding the

complainant could not able to hold the child

and hence miscarriage but the acutal story is

the complainant along with her mother went to

the abovesaid Nursing home to check up for

the pregnancy and after check up doctor

mentioned in his report one week positive urine

test in order to ascertain the status of

pregnancy and also adviced to undergo for

ultrasound.However complainant did not return

to the doctor.Even if her story to be believed of

pregnancy and miscarraige it has happened at

her parental house even the prescription of

Gandhi Nursing home situated at Uttam Naga,

New Delhi reveals the medicines which were

used by the complainant are anti pregnancy

and normally prescribed for the medical

abortion. Hence such miscarriage was planned

abortion which was aborted with the permission

of complainant father and mother and without

the knowledge/consent of petitioner or his

family members.
22. The Petitioner shall abide by all the terms

and conditions as may be imposed by this

Hon’ble Court in case of grant of anticipatory

bail to them.

23. There is no possibility of Petitioner running

away of fleeing from the judicial process in

case of grant of anticipatory bail to them.

24. The Petitioner’s Anticipatory Bail was filed

on 11th January, 2016 and since then he had

joined the investigation as and when called for

and was enjoying the interim bail till the final

decision of dismissal of Petitioner’s

anticipatory bail application was made vide

impugned order dated 19th March, 2016.

25. The Petitioner had joined the enquiry before

the Crime Against Women Cell, Sector-9,

Dwarka and had joined the investigation as and

when called for by the Investigation Officer and

is ready to join any further investigation in the

present FIR.

26. That there is no apprehension of Petitioner

jumping the bail granted by this Hon’ble le

Court or tempering with the prosecution case

or with the evidence.

27. That no similar petition has been filed or

pending before this Hon’ble Court or before

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India or any other

court.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that

this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant

Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioner in FIR

No.0898/2015, PS Najafgarh, New Delhi U/S 498-

A,406, 313, 325,34 IPC and the Investigation

Officer/ Station House Officer of the concerned

police station may be directed to release the

Petitioner on bail in case of his arrest in the

interest of justice.

Any further order/relief which this Hon’ble

court may deem fit and proper may be passed in

favour of the Petitioner.

Applicant/Accused
Delhi
Dated: 01.04.2016 Through

Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy

(Advocates)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION

I, Atul kumar Rana aged aged about 31 years S/O

Sh. Raja Ram Singh Rana R/o 128/1040, Y Block,

Kidwai Nagar, PS Naubasta, Kanpur City (U.P.)

prsently at New Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm

and declare as under:

1. That I am the applicant/accused in the

accompanying application under section 438

Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. That I am well conversant with the facts and

circumstances of the present case and am

therefore competent to depose the same as

the appellant.
 3. That the application has been drafted by the

Ld. Counsel under my instructions and the

contents of the same have been read over,

explained to me in my vernacular and

admitted by me to be true and correct.

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION:

Verified at New Delhi on this…… day of April

2016 that the contents of the aforesaid paras are

true and correct to my knowledge and no part of

it is false and nothing material has been

concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 Cr.P.C.

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILLING THE

2CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE

DOCUMENTS/ANNEXURES.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the accompanying application for grant

of bail of the applicant/accused and the

contents of the same may be read as part

and parcel of this application also as the

same are not being repeated for the sake

brevity.

2. That various documents had been

filed/annexed along with the accompanying

application which are true copies of their

respective originals. The applicant/accused

 is not in possession of the certified copies of

the same which will be procured within short

span of time and shall be produced as and

when necessary and directed to be filed by

this Hon’ble Court.

PRAYER

In these circumstances, it is therefore most

respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court

may be pleased to:

a. Exempt the applicant/accused from filling

the original/certified copies of the

documents/orders annexed with the

accompanying application as annexures at

this stage,

b. Pass such order and further orders or

directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem

fit and proper in the facts of this case.

APPLICANT

DATE:01.04.2016

DELHI THROUGH

Rajiv Khosla &Onkar Roy

Advocates
Ch. No. 167, Civil Wing,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPL. No. ……… of 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

ATUL KUMAR RANA …..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE …..RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION

I, Atul kumar Rana aged aged about 31 years S/O

Sh. Raja Ram Singh Rana R/o 128/1040, Y Block,

Kidwai Nagar, PS Naubasta, Kanpur City (U.P.)

presently at New Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm

and declare as under:

1. That I am the applicant/accused in the

accompanying application under section 482

Cr.P.C.

2. That I am well conversant with the facts and

circumstances of the present case and am

therefore competent to depose the same as

the appellant.
 3. That the application has been drafted by the

Ld. Counsel under my instructions and the

contents of the same have been read over,

explained to me in my vernacular and

admitted by me to be true and correct.

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION:

Verified at New Delhi on this…… day of ……

2016 that the contents of the aforesaid paras are

true and correct to my knowledge and no part of

it is false and nothing material has been

concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT
HMA NO. 825/14/13

Atul Kumar Rana Vs Ms. Deepika

02.07.2015

Present: None for Petitioner

Sh. Mahvir Singh, Stated to be father of

respondent.

Father of respondent moved an

application thereby submitting that his

daughter namely Ms. Deepika i.e. respondent

is residing with petitioner at Kanpur.

Let the statement of father of respondent be

recorded as Under: -

statement of Sh. Mahavir Singh S/o Late Sh. Ram

Sahay aged about 45 years R/o B-39, Indra Park,

Najafgarh, New Delhi-110045.

On SA

I am making this statement voluntarily

without any force, coercion or undue influence.

My daughter namely Ms. Deepika i.e. the

respondent is residing with the petitioner at her

matrimonial home at Kanpur and both the parties

are living together happily along with their minor

child w.e.f. 19.03.2014 as per the settlement

arrived at between the parties before CAW Cell,

Nanakpura, New Delhi. My application regarding

residing of respondent with the petitioner is Ex.

C-1, which bears my signature at point A. The

petition be dismissed as withdrawn being settled.

I undertake to remain bound by statement.

RO & AC

Sd/-

M. K. Gupta

District & Principal Judge,

South-West Distt., Family Court

Dwarka, New Delhi/02.07.2015

HMA No. 825/14/13

Atul Kumar Rana vs. Ms. Deepika

Order : -

In view of above statement of father of

respondent, the present petition is dismissed as

withdrawn bein settled. File be consigned to

record room.

Sd/-

M. K. Gupta

District & Principal Judge,

South-West Distt., Family Court

Dw arka, New Delhi/02.07.2015

 IN THE COURT OF SH. VIKAS DHULL,SPL

JUDGE(PC)(CBI)-03,DWARKA COURTS, NEW

DELHI

Bail Application NO.CF-0086/16

Atul Kumar Rana Vs State

FIR NO-0898/15

U/S-498A/406/34 IPC

PS-Najafgarh

19.03.2016

Present: Sh Yogendra Adari,Ld Addl.PP for the

State.

Complainant with counsel

IO in person with police file.

Counsel for applicant/accused.

Detailed reply file today by the IO.

Remaining arguments heard and police

file perused.

The allegations against applicant/accused are

that he got married with thecomplainant way back

in the year 2007 and at the time of

marriage,Rs.17 Lacs worth of dowry was given in

marriage. It was alledge that during the course of

marriage, dowry of Tata Safari,more cash and

jewellery was demanded for which complainant

was being tortured.It is also alleged that an

amount of Rs.4,65,000/- has been given to the

applicant pursuant to his dowry demand.It is

further alleged that when complainant got

preganant in the month of February ,2015 then

applicant/accused and mother in law of

complainant gave her wrong medicine which

resulted into mis-carriage of the complainant. It is

alleged that all the dowry articles are in the

possession of applicant/accused and his relatives

and same are not being returned despite

requests.It is further alleged applicant/accused

had caused fracture in the hand of the

complainant way back in the year 2010.

Counsel for the applicant/accused has sought

anticipatory bail on the ground that all the

allegations made against applicant/accused are

false andfabricated. It is further alleged that

although applicant/accused denies receipt of

dowry of Rs.17 Lacs in marriage and thereafter,

Rs.4,65,000/- but still he is willing to deposit the

dowry articles with the IO/court which are in his

possession. It is further submitted that

applicant/accused has joined the

investigation.Accordingly,he has prayed for grant

of anticipatory bail.

On the other hand, ld.Addl. PP for the state as

well as Ld. Counsel for the complainant has

strongly opposed the bail application. It is

submitted that there are serious allegations

against applicant/accused for the causing mis-

carriage of the complainant under section 313

IPC.It is further submitted by Ld.Addl.PP that

there are medical documents with the IO to show

the miscarriage of the complainant and fracture in

hand of complainant.In support of his

submissions,Ld.Addl.PP has cited the judgement

delivered in Mayank Pathak vs.State (Govt.Of

NCT of Delhi) Anr.,(2015)11 SCC,798.

In the facts and circumstances, having

regard to the seriousness of allegations.No case

is made out for grant of anticipatory

bail.Hence,the same is dismissed.

As prayed, a copy of order be given dasti to

Ld.Counsel for the applicant/accused.

(Vikas Dhull)

Spl.Judge(PC Act)(CBI)-03

Dwarka Courts

New Delhi

FIRST INFORMATION REPORT

(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Distt. South West Delhi PS Najafgarh Year

2015 FIR. No.0898 dated 13.11.2015

2. Acts Sections

(i) Act 498-A/406/34 IPC

3(a) Occurrence of offence Date from

to

Time period Time from hrs. Time to

(b)Information received at PS. date 13.11.2015

Time 13.25 hours

(c) General Diary Reference: Entry No.020-A

Time 13.25 hours

4. Type of information Written ** /oral

5. Place of occurrence

(a) Direction and distance

of the Police Station. Beat No.

(b) Address:

(c) In case falling outside the limit

of the Police Station, then

Name of PS........... Distt. ...............

6. (a) Name of Complainant/Informant DEEPIKA

(S/O) MAHAVIR SINGH

(b) Date/year of birth Nationality India

(d) Passport No. Date of issue

(e) Place of issue

(f) Occupation

(g) Address: B-39, INDIRA PARK, NAJAFGARH

SOUTH WEST DELHI-INDIA

7. Details of known/suspected

accused with full particulars

(attach separate sheet if necessary)

(1)

8. Reasons for delay in reporting No Delay

by the complainant/informant.

9. Particulars of properties

stolen ( attach separate

sheet if necessary

I) Property type (Description) Estimated

value

10. Total value of property

stolen. Status

11. Inquest report/U.D. case

if any.

12. FIR. contents (Attach separate sheet, if

required).
To The DCP Saheb, SPU W&C, Nanakpura, New

Delhi: Sub: Complaint against husband Atul

Kumar Rana, mother in law Vimla, father in law

Rajaram Singh Rana, Devar Prashant Kumar, and

sister in law by complainant Deepika for dowry

harassment and mental and physical cruelty.

Sir, It is respectfully submitted that my

(Deepika’s) marriage was solemnized on

30.11.2007 according to Hindu Marital rights and

ceremonies with Atul Kumar Rana S/o Shri Raja

Ram Singh Rana, address 128/1040, Y Block

Kidwai Nagar Kanpur Uttar Pradesh at RZ-21-22,

Park near Roshan Mandi, Najafgarh, New Delhi.

At the time of marriage, my parents had gifted

dowry articles, gold jewellery, car and cash much

beyond their financial capacity to them. On

28.10.2007 at the time of “Goad Bharai”

ceremony, my husband Atul Kumar and father in

law Rajaram Singh, mother in law Vimla

demanded a larger car as dowry when my father

and other relatives explained the situation and

they had also accepted the position and after

formally completing the said ceremony, they had

gone back the following day. On 30.11.2007 after

the Jaimala, my husband and mother in law,

father in law told me and my father to demanded

Rs.10.0 lakh in cash and Safari vehicle apart

from gold jewellery in dowry while declaring that

Phera ceremony would only follow that and my

sister in law also demanded gold chain from me.

The issue became so serious that all relatives

gathered for the marriage ceremony came to

know that the bride’s in-laws are making huge

demands of money. My relatives and father tried

their best to bring round my in laws but they did

not relent while my husband and father in law

started being abusive and violent with my

parents. Still the relatives gathered there tried to

reason with them after which they relented and

the marriage ceremonies were completed; when

after the ceremonial send off, I came to my

matrimonial home alongwith my husband, my

mother in law and sister in law were not allowing

us to enter the house when the women present

also tried to reason with them and only then I was

allowed to enter the matrimonial home and on the

first night, my husband had consummated the

marriage and on the following day, my husband,

mother in law, sister in law had removed the

entire jewellery worn by me and told them that

they will keep it in safe custody. A week after the

marriage when I was to return for the “Pug-phera”

ceremony to my parental home I asked for the

jewellery which they refused to return and I came

to my parental home at B-39, Indira Park,

Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043 alongwith my

husband, mother in law, devar etc. My family

treated them to a rousing reception and on the

following day, my husband, mother in law, sister

in law and Devar demanded from my father the

sum of Rs.10.0 lakhs promised to be given as

dowry while reminding him that on the day of

marriage they had acceded to performing the

marriage without such payment at the behest of

relatives present but now this demand has to be

met. My father requested that he had two other

daughters and is thus unable to pay such huge

amount of cash but my sister in law (Deepika)

demanded a Gold chain while my devar also

demanded the gold chain and on our inability to

give the same, my husband, mother in law, sister

in law and devar started abusing my mother and

resorted to physical violence but I did not report

the matter to police merely for the sake of saving

my marriage. On the following day, my husband,

mother in law, sister in law and devar started

moving out without taking me along and saying

that unless their aforesaid demand is met, they

will not take me to the matrimonial home and thus

they had left leaving me behind and my husband

went to the house of his paternal aunt (Bua) at

NOIDA. After 15 days my father telephoned and

asked my husband and father in law as when they

intended to take the bride back, my husband and

father in law declared that they did not have time

while asking him to leave me at the matrimonial

home themselves and after about one month, my

parents took me along to the matrimonial home.

For some days my in-laws had maintained cordial

relations but then my husband, mother in law,

sister in law and devar started harassing,

torturing and abusing me on petty issues and

once when I got up late in the morning owing to

some weakness, then my husband and mother in

law started abusing me. I complained about this

to my father in law but he also started scolding

and abusing me. I told my parents about this. My

father took up the issue with my husband and

father in law and tried to pacify the situation; on

this the situation remained some what peaceful

for a few days and then on one fine day, when a

tea cup got cracked, my mother in law, sister in

law and Devar started abusing me while my Devar

caught hold of my hands and my mother in law

and sister in law slapped me repeatedly. I

reported this incident to my father and my father

came to my matrimonial home the following day

and took up the matter and after pacifying the

situation, my mother in law and devar accepted

their guilt and assured that this will not be

repeated in future; I returned to Delhi with my

father and stayed back with them for 4-5 months

while my in laws did not make any inquiry about

my welfare. My father brought the issue to the

notice of other relatives known to my in laws

telling them about the gross misbehaviour meted

out to his daughter while living in the matrimonial

home on which all of them reprimanded my in-

laws but despite this, my in laws did not make

any effort for nearly nine months to take me back

and ultimately my parents had to take me back to

the matrimonial home and tried to reason with my

parents in law while my mother had taken up the

issue with my mother in law and sister in law

after which my parents returned home. Two two

months they treated me normally but thereafter

my husband started returning home late and once

came to me at 2.00 AM in seriously drunken

condition and started abusing my parents while

declaring that he had a licensed revolver and that

he will shoot me and my parents; about this I had

complained to my parents in law while my sister

in law and Devar also reached there. Upon seeing

them, my husband started abusing me filthily and

giving me kicks and fist blows and twisted back

my hand while hitting it with his legs; my sister in

law caught hold of from my hair while hitting it

against the ground; my parents in law

continuously exhorted them to kill this “saali”

once for all; my devar gave many kicks and fist

blows to my abdomen while I kept crying but no

one came to my rescue and I lost consciousness

but my husband and in laws still did not relent

and did not take me to any hospital. When I

regained consciousness, my in laws ran away out

of fear. There was acute pain in my hand and

entire body when I related the whole episode to

Prince who is related to me as Devar and he took

me to the doctor who diagnosed the injury and

advised to put the hand in plaster but he got

some medicines for me and dropped me home. I

intimated my father on phone on the following day

on which my parents also came to my marital

house when my husband, mother in law, father in

law, sister in law and devar started abusing them

and the locality people had gathered. Looking to

my condition, my parents took me to Delhi where

I had received treatment in Sinha Nursing Home

and my hand was put in plaster while my father

bore all the expenses. After about ten days, my

father phoned his counter part complaining about

such violent beating of his daughter and causing

fracture of her hand and asked him as to much

humane is this? and told him that he and his wife

were coming to Kanpur on 26.3.2010 alongwith

some respectable persons and my daughter

Deepika and when he alongwith his wife and

some other relatives reached Kanpur, my

husband, mother in law, devar, sister in law were

present there along with some neighbours. All of

them discussed about some compromise but my

husband and in laws started abusing and

resorting their violent behaviour towards my

parents and other relatives when my father had

rang up the police at No.100. At about 1.30 AM in

the night the police personnel arrived when the

SHO and tried to reason with my husband and

other in laws and told them that the girl will

accompany her parents back and that they should

go and bring back the girl themselves. My

husband and other in laws apologized to me and

my parents while I returned with my parents to

Delhi and remained there for 16 days. After 16

days, my husband came at night in drunken

condition and started quarrelling and hitting me

violently and also abused my parents but still I

did not complain to the police against my

husband merely to save my marital life. The

following day my husband took me along and

returned to the matrimonial home where the

situation remained normal but only for a few days

while my husband had been going to attend his

share-marketing business but returning late in the

night in drunken condition. On 1.7.2010 I went

out with my sister in law for medical check up

when the doctor advised that I was carrying two

month old pregnancy and after giving some

medicines he sent me back home and advised me

to get such check up every month. 4-5 days after

returning home, my husband and mother in law

asked me as to why had I gone for such check up

and making this an issue, my mother in law gave

me a kick blow in the abdomen, my husband

caught hold of my hands while both of them kept

beating and abusing me. I intimated my father

about this on the same day and my father

reached there on the following day when I related

the whole story to him and because of my

deteriorating condition, I returned to Delhi

alongwith my parents when they got me medically

checked up in Gandhi Nursing Home on

20.8.2010. The doctor opined that he could tell

about condition of the child after Ultrasound and

after ultrasound, he stated that the foetus

condition was not good and thus I remained

admitted in the nursing home for six days and

further three months’ bed rest was advised while

continuing medicines. On 4.3.2011 I gave birth to

a female child in Gandhi Nursing Home and

information thereof was given to my in laws. On

5.3.2011 my husband and mother in law came to

meet me in the hospital. They stayed for some

time in the hospital but did not discuss anything

about taking me back while returning on the

following day. My parents had to bear all the

Natal expenses. After the child birth I stayed with

my parents for nearly 20 days and on 20.3.2011

my husband and father in law called us to inform

that “Goad Bharai” ceremony of their daughter is

to take place and that we should reach Kanpur in

time alongwith Deepika. I travelled by train

accompanied with my mother and reached Kanpur

when my husband and in-laws treated me

cordially for nearly nine months because

marriage of my sister in law was to be performed

during November, 2011. After the marriage of my

sister in law, their atrocities started once again

and during December, 2011 I had to inform my

parents about this. Hearing this, my parents

again came and tried to reason with my husband,

parents in law, Devar, etc. collectively while

advising them to let us settle down in the family

but my husband, mother in law, father in law and

devar did not relent and asked my parents to take

back their daughter finally. I demanded my entire

Stridhan back from my husband, mother in law,

father in law and devar but they did not return the

same and all of them have illegally retained my

entire Stridhan including gold jewellery which are

in possession of my husband and parents in law

and brother in law. I returned to Delhi alongwith

my parents. From December, 2011 to May, 2012 I

stayed in my parental home during which my

father had told all relatives about my condition.

During June, 2012, my husband, parents in law

and their relatives had convened the Panchayat

in Kanpur where my parents also reached

alongwith other relatives. The respectable

persons from both sides tried to find a solution

when my husband and parents in law agreed to

accept me back in the matrimonial home and I

alongwith my daughter accompanied my husband

and parents in law to reach the matrimonial

home. For six months they treated me well and

after some days my husband and parents in law

again started picking up quarrels on petty issues.

I again informed my father who talked to my

husband and other relatives that in laws of

Deepika have once again returned to their old

tantrums but my husband and parents in law did

not give any satisfactory reply but I remained in

the matrimonial home only to save marriage. On

8.2.2013, my sister’s marriage was to take place

and I reached my parental home with my mother

who had come to take me to Delhi during

January, 2013 for attending the marriage. Since

then I have been forced to stay back in my

parental home and my in laws’ family has never

looked back. On 22-23 February, 2013 my

husband had called me at No.8505817239 while

appearing to be in drunken condition and told that

he will shoot my old parents or else I should

leave him alone and divorce him. He told me that

he had filed a divorce case and will decide the

matter in court and will never come to take me

back. My husband, parents in law and Devar had

demanded dowry from my parents and had

resorted to serious violence with all of us and had

cruelly treated me, therefore, deterrent action be

taken against them. On 19.3.2014, my husband

Atul Kumar and father in law Raja Ram Singh

Rana and his relatives had given in writing that

they intended to allow us to settle down and on

that very day, my husband Atul Kumar had come

to home at B-39, Indira Park, Najafgarh New

Delhi for taking me back. On that day, my

husband had made a further demand of Rs.5.0

lakhs as dowry when my parents had told him that

they not have that kind of money at that time and

assured him to get the same after some time. On

that day my husband took me and my daughter to

the matrimonial home at Kanpur and for some

days everything went well but after a few days my

husband Atul Kumar started living with his mother

while I was staying alone in the ground floor with

my daughter. My husband used to sleep with his

mother in the first floor and I requested him many

a times but he insisted that till his demand for

Rs.five lakhs is met, he will not return to sleep

nor will maintain any relations with me. When I

objected to such conduct, my husband, mother in

law, sister in law Deepika and devar started

abusing me filthily while my mother in law and

sister in law caught hold of my hair and hands

and pinned me down when my husband and devar

started beating me with kick and fist blows and

threatened to throw me out of the matrimonial

home. I related everything about this to my

parents when my parents and other relatives took

up the issue with my in laws and they kept me

normally for some days after which I had

conceived. I had told this to my husband and

mother in law and also to my mother through

telephone. Once when I was having acute

headache and fever, I told my husband but

instead of giving me medicine for my illness, they

forced me to take five tablets which resulted in

severe bleeding to me and my condition

deteriorated further. I phoned my mother about

this but when I told my husband, mother in law

and sister in law about this, none of them took to

any doctor. My mother came to me on 7.2.2015

and took me to Sarojini Medical Centre, Kanpur

where the doctors conducted complete medical

check up and advised that the pregnancy is very

weak and I should not lift weights and should not

undertake any heavy duty otherwise such

bleeding will recur. On the same night severe

bleeding resumed again and miscarriage resulted.

I was given medicines which had led to this

situation. There was no one to take care of my

condition. I was suffering from blackouts

therefore after consulting my husband I came to

Delhi with my mother on 9.2.2015 where I was

admitted in Gandhi Nursing Home, Om Vihar,

Uttam Nagar on 10.2.2015 and the doctors

examined me and sent me back after giving some

medicines. After some days my husband came to

B-39, Indira Park, Najafgarh, New Delhi-43 and

after staying for one day, he repeated the same

demand of Rs.5.0 lakhs and since my parents had

some cash with them and they raised more from

some known persons and gave Rs.4,65,000/- to

my husband while my husband took me and my

daughter to Kanpur. After treating me normally for

some days, my husband’s conduct assumed same

conditions as before and although I have tried my

best to save the marriage but my husband, devar

and parents in law are bent upon ruining our

marriage and resort to violence, harassment and

dowry demands and those people have now

crossed all limits. My father in law Rajaram Singh

Rana abuses me in a filthy manner while my

mother in law Vimla and father in law Rajaram

Singh and Devar Prashant and husband Atul

Kumar have been beating me mercilessly and

have frequently fought with me and beaten me

while threatening that they will force me out of

the matrimonial home. My husband, parents in

law and Devar have always beaten me while

giving kick and fist blows which has caused

injuries to my breasts and abdomen; had torn my

clothes, demanded Rs.10.0 lakhs as dowry. Legal

action be taken against all of them and my earlier

complaint be reopened. Thanking you,

complainant Sd/- English Deepika D/o Shri

Mahavir Singh, B-39, Indira Park, Najafgarh,

Delhi-110043 Phone No. 9818687941 dated

28.7.2015. Atul Kumar Rana S/o Rajaram Singh

Rana address 128/1040, Y Block, Kidwai Nagar,

Kanpur Uttar Pradesh Pin-208011 phone

No.09580012541 Atul Kumar Rana 09415147942,

Rajaram Singh Rana 09415232289 Shrimati

Vimla. Duty Officer. Register a case under

Section 498-A/406/34 IPC and investigation

handed over to me. Sd/- English SI Hawa Singh,

D-361 PS Najafgarh Date 13.11.2015. Police

action: On the receipt of Tehrir, a case under

Section 498-A/406/34 IPC has been registered.

Copy of FIR alongwith original rukka handed over

to SI Hawa Singh for further investigation.

Information will be sent to senior officers through

dak. HC/DO

13. Action taken. Since the above report reveals

commission of offences under sections as

mentioned at item No.2.

(1) Registered the case and took up the

investigation

(2) Directed/Entrusted (Name of I.O. HAWA

SINGH SI (SUB INSPECTOR) NO.16080011 Rank

SI to take up the investigation.

(3) Refused investigation due to........

(4) Transferred to PS........ Distt......... on point

of jurisdiction.
FIR was read over to the complainant/informant

admitted to be correctly recorded and a copy

given to the complainant/informant free of cost.

14. RO&AC. Signature and thumb impression

of the complainant/informant.

Signature of the officer

Sd/- RAMBIR SINGH

Rank HC (HEAD CONSTABLE)

PIS. No.

( True Translation )

15-249-15

(11)

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

KANPUR CITY
 Please refer to your Endorsement Order

No.SSP-C-C-15-249/15 dated 24.8.2015 which

relates to the filing of report after conducting

inquiry into the complaint of Shri Raja Ram Singh

Rana, Inspector, Anti Corruption Department

Kanpur of 128/1040, Y- Block, Kidwai Nagar,

Police Station Naubasta, Kanpur City.

In this behalf, it is to be respectfully

submitted that detailed inquiry report based on

the complaint of Shrimati Deepika Rani W/o Shri

Atul Kumar Rana D/o Shri Mahavir Singh,

resident of B-39, Indira Park, Najafgarh, New

Delhi daughter in law of the above named

complainant had already been submitted in

compliance and upon receipt of your endorsement

No.SSPC-15-228/15 dated 11.8.2015. Separate

inquiry based on the complaint of applicant does

not seem to be required. Photocopy of the

Investigation Report submitted earlier is being

annexed for your kind perusal.

Report is accordingly submitted for your kind

perusal.
 Sd/- Vishal Pandeya
Station Officer, Govind Nagar
Kanpur City

Encl: As above

Dated: August ,2015

The Senior Superintendent of Police
Kanpur City

Kindly refer to your Endorsement order No.

SSP-C-228/15-II dated 11.8.2015 which called for

submission of the report after conducting inquiry

into the complaint filed by complainant Shrimati

Deepika Rana W/o Shri Atul Kumar Rana D/o Shri

Mahavir Singh, resident of B-39, Indira Park,

Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043.

ALLEGATIONS

The complainant above named has mainly

recorded in her complaint that her marriage was

solemnized on 30.11.2007. My father had gifted

in the marriage the Innova car which is registered

in my name which is now in custody of my in-laws

and which my in laws have refused to return and

the jewellery given by my parents at the time of

my marriage is also retained by my in-laws which

they are not returning to me. Since 2007 to 2010

I had been harassed and cruelly treated both

mentally and physically as a result of which my

right hand was fractured. Since July, 2010 they

had been beating me. My mother in law Vimla

gave kick blows to my abdomen while my

husband had caught hold of my hands. On

17.7.2015, my husband, father in law, brother in

law (Devar) mother in law and sister in law had

beaten me up mercilessly and tore my clothes

after which my father in law tried to physically

molest me against which I have lodged a

complaint with PS. Naubasta recording all those

allegations.

DESCRIPTION OF INVESTIGATION

During the course of investigation, the

complainant Shrimati Deepika and the opposite

party – complainant’s husband Shri Atul Kumar

Rana and father in law Shri Raja Ram Singh

Rana, Shri Satyendra Kumar Mishra, Inspector,

BNS, Kanpur City and independent Mohalla

residents were interrogated.

Upon interrogation, the complainant Shrimati

Deepika Rana W/o Shri Atul Kumar Rana D/o Shri

Mahabir Singh resident of B-39, Indra Park,

Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043 Mobile

No.9818687941 disclosed that “my marriage was

solemnized on 30.11.2007 with Atul Kumar Rana

S/o Shri Rajaram Singh Rana, resident of

128/1040, Y-Block, Kidwai Nagar,PS. Naubasta.

After the marriage, those people had started

torturing me physically and mentally and after

such quarrels, they resorted to beatings and with

a view to implicate me and my father in false

cases, they continued to file complaints.

Thereafter constant incidents took place. From

time to time, the police was informed about such

complaints against them. On 20.3.2013, a

complaint was lodged with the DCP (Crime

against Women Cell) Nanakpura, New Delhi for

such dowry harassment and cruelty. When the

matter reached the stage of registration of FIR

against them, they assured through relatives that

they will maintain the girl in a respectable manner

and that they wishes to settle down the family.

Upon this, settlement was recorded in writing

twice on 25.7.2013 and 19.3.2014. On 24.2.2010,

my mother in law, sister in law, husband and

brother in law resorted to physical beatings which

resulted in fracturing my left hand. My father in

law was also present on the spot. Report about

this was lodged with 100 PCR. Local Police

reached the place of occurrence when my in laws

started requesting with folded hands. Thereafter

during July, 2010 again, my in laws gave physical

beatings to me for the reason that I had gone for

a medical check up alongwith my sister in law of

my own to the doctor who opined that I was

carrying pregnancy since two months and sent me

home. 4-5 days after this, my husband and

mother in law scolded for having got myself

checked up without consulting them which led

from abuses and insults to physical beatings

which resulted in my falling down on the ground

and losing consciousness. I reported this to my

parents on phone and my parents came to Kanpur

and reprimanded my husband and father in law as

to why had they not taken me to the Doctor. Upon

this all my in laws started misbehaving with my

parents asking them to take away their daughter

and get her treated there. On 19.8.2010 my

parents took me from Kanpur to Delhi and

admitted me in Gandhi Nursing Home on

20.8.2010 for check up. Upon receipt of the

Ultrasound report it was revealed that all was not

well and I was admitted and remained there for

five days. Afterwards, they advised me bed rest

for 3-4 months and the medical treatment

continued. On 4.3.2011, I gave birth to a female

child in Gandhi Nursing Home. During all those

months, none from my in laws came to visit me.

Medical documents are annexed. “Goad Bharai”

ceremony of my sister in law was to be performed

in Kanpur but they did not come to take me there

even at that time while advising me to reach

there on my own. When I reached Kanpur they

treated me normally only for a few days to avoid

any complication. Then similar misbehaviour,

beatings, abuses and insults were repeated. On

12.3.2014 I filed another complaint requesting for

legal action against Rajaram Singh Rana and his

family. The complaint is annexed. In this way, on

23.7.2014 and 24.7.2014 also, my mother in law

Vimla Devi, husband Atul Rana, brother in law

Prashant Kumar resorted to physical beatings and

abusing me. After such quarrel the above named

Vimla Devi had gone away to stay with her sister

at Anarkali. I gave this information to my parents

on phone. My father lodged a complaint against

these persons with SHO, Anand Parbat, New

Delhi on 26.7.2014 and also apprised the SHO

Anand Parbat New Delhi of the facts on

28.7.2014 and the same were investigated. They

were called to the police station but they did not

come. They were directed to approach the girl at

Kanpur, apologize and revert back to him. During

March 2013 my father in law, husband, mother in

law and Devar conspired against me and filed a

petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act

seeking a decree of divorce before the Presiding

Officer, Family Court, Kanpur wherein I had gone

to appear in the court on 14.3.2013 alongwith my

father and paternal uncle (Phoopha). When I had

reached near the court, my husband Atul Kumar

came alongwith 3/4 boys and blocked our way

while starting to abuse us in most filthy language

and while threatening to kill us, Atul Rana flashed

his Licensed Pistol and declared that if we were

ever seen there, he will put all the six bullets

inside us. This complaint was given in writing to

PS.Kotwali Kanpur. Thereafter, SSP Kanpur/DIG

Kanpur were also apprised in writing on

16.5.2013. There being no action, reminder was

sent on 2.6.2013. On 17.10.15 at 11.45 my

mother in law, father in law husband and brother

in law violently attacked me with kicks and fist

blows and tore my clothes and attempted to

commit rape on me. I suffered injuries on my

breast, abdomen and feet while they took out a

revolver threatening to kill me. Somehow or the

other I came out and dialled 100 number and

apprised the police at PS Naubasta about the

situation and went to the police station. All these

details are recorded in my complaint which is

annexed. I had suffered multiple injuries. Upon

directions from SSP/PRO and CO Govind Nagar,

the SO. PS Naubasta did not get me medically

examined. My father continuously tried to contact

the higher authorities and in this connection, SO

Naubasta called me to the police station on

18.7.2015. In a room there also, I was given

threats of being thrown out of the house and not

being allowed me to stay and talked to me

insultingly and when I was just to move out of the

police station, they abused my mother in a filthy

manner which issue was reported in writing to the

SO and SSP on which the SO recorded a case

under Section 504 IPC against Raja Ram. They

misbehaved with my father also in presence of

the SO while threatening that they will implicate

us in such false cases that we will remember.

From this it is clear that my in laws had

constantly been treating me cruelly. There were a

number of Panchayats attended by their relatives

also but there was no allegation against me. After

the incident of 17.7.2015, they have started

making false insinuations only to prevent any

action against him. False FIR was lodged against

my parents. I request that FIR should be lodged

against my in-laws for committing the offences of

cruelty and harassment to force dowry demands,

resorting to abusive misbehaviour and attempt to

commit rape against me. This is my humble

request.

The opposite party Shri Atul Kumar Rana

aged 30 years S/o Shri Rajaram Singh Rani,

resident of House No.128/1040, Y Block, Kidwai

Nagar was interrogated who had stated that “His

marriage was solemnized in the year 2007 with

Deepika D/o Mahavir Singh, resident of B-39,

Indira Park, Najafgarh PS Najafgarh, New Delhi

without any dowry. The applicant was studying for

his MCA in Delhi during the year 2007; his father

Rajaram Singh Rani was suffering from heart

ailment and working in the Police and posted in

another District; There were my mother in the

household, younger brother Prashant Rana and

sister Dipika who were still studying; his father

was posted as Station Officer in Hargaon, Distt.

Sitapur; Mother’s presence was required for

constantly looking after his father; during this

period, Surajpal Singh who knew my father and

Deepika’s father Mahavir Singh negotiated our

marriage which was solemnized about eight years

ago; a daughter now aged about five years was

born from the wedlock with me; that I needed one

car and the Innova Car which is claimed to have

been given to my in dowry was actually

purchased from my own money; advance payment

of Rs.10,000/- was deposited by me Atul Kumar

Rani and DD and cheque No.244069 for

Rs.4,00,000/- dated 19.11.2007 were used from

the accounts of my mother Vimla Rana and Atul

Kumar Rana and Rs.3,00,000/- cash was paid to

M/s Galaxy Auto Mobile Pvt.Ltd., 69/1-A,

Najafgarh Road, Moti Nagar Crossing, New Delhi-

110015 and the remaining amount was also paid

by taking cash from my father; my father in law

had committed fraud with me right from the

beginning; I did not comprehend that I will

become a victim of such fraud when he got the

car registered in the name of his daughter

Deepika. When I went to the company showroom

to get delivery of the vehicle, I was shocked since

the entire amount by draft and cash was paid by

me while the car documents were prepared in the

name of Deepika D/o Mahavir Singh; I had

protested about this to Mahavir Singh to which he

replied that since I did not have any ID proof

there, the vehicle could not be registered in my

name; that there was nothing amiss since I was

his son in law and Deepika was my wife, it will be

all the same; I had repeatedly requested him to

get the car transferred in my name at my Kanpur

address but he continued to skip the matter and I

had learnt that out of the amount paid by me, an

amount of Rs.1,90,000/- had been shown by

Mahavir Singh as loan from the company; in this

manner, Deepika and her parents had got the

vehicle purchased with my month delivered in her

name and thus they have committed fraud with

me; my parents in law had repeatedly taken the

car to Delhi while returning the same alongwith

Deepika; both families have been using the

vehicle; if they submit the account properly, I do

not have any objection in giving the vehicle back

to Deepika in whose name the vehicle is

registered; photocopy of the statement of account

about payments having been made to Galaxy

Toyota are annexed for perusal; My wife’s father

or anyone from their side had never given any

jewellery or clothes in the marriage nor is the

same being retained by us; rather some

ornaments given by my parents including four

gold bangles, two gold necklaces one paid of gold

Jhumkas, gold “Nathth”, one silver Pazeb and all

sorts of wedding clothes given by them have been

maliciously and illegally retained by her mother

Meera and father Mahavir Singh and which have

not been returned till date. I had mentioned all

these details in the documents annexed with the

Divorce Petition by me.

2. Right from the beginning after marriage, my

wife did not wish to stay with me. My parents in

law wanted me to settle down in Delhi and to

spend whatever I earn on their family because my

wife had two younger sisters and one younger

brother. Father in law Mahavir Singh was serving

in a Private company with very ordinary salary

and they needed me to give support to their

family. My father in law used to drink and was

unable to make his both ends meet and thus he

was pressurizing me; in the meanwhile my

younger brother Prashant went to join AIMT

College, Lucknow for his B.Tech degree from

where he qualified in year 2013 and underwent

coaching for IAS. My younger sister did her

M.A.,B.Ed. and joined Rao Coaching Centre while

living in Lucknow for preparing for her Civil

Service examination in the year 2010 and during

2011 she was married with an Engineer of Jaipur.

My father lived out of station while I and my

mother were alone in the house. For my business,

I obtained franchisee of M/s Vickson Securities

Commodities Pvt.Ltd. in Kanpur. From 2007 to

2010 my wife and parents in law harassed me no

end and used to travel by Innova while returning

after periods of three and even four months;

taking away what ever I had earned and the worst

part came during 2010 when Mahavir Singh

accompanied with 10-12 persons in two vehicles

descended at my house during the night and

started rowdy scene; Mahavir Singh was the

District President of BSP in Najafgarh and there

was BSP government in power; wife Deepika,

mother Meera and grand mother had also

accompanied them and resorted to acute

rowdyism on which I had to report the matter to

Police Control Room and local police station

Naubasta; upon arrival of the police, those

people ran away while my wife had wrapped cloth

around her wrist while falsely claiming that I had

fractured her hand; I confronted them that when

she was with you people for the last three months

how could I fracture her hand in Delhi and when

the police wanted to examine her hand, all of

them ran away. It is absolutely wrong that she

had filed any complaint with PS.Naubasta or

before any higher authority during 2010 or that I

or my mother had resorted to beat her; on the

contrary they were taking undue advantage of

their contacts in BSP and there being BSP

Government all of them had come for pressurizing

me which I had reported to the police. Right from

the time of my marriage in the year 2007, they

have been harassing and intimidating me and my

family; I or my family have never caused any

cruelty.

Thus seriously apprehending that my wife,

who does not intend to live with me and intends

to implicate me and my family members in false

criminal cases, on 23.1.2013, I had filed the

petition seeking divorce titled Atul Kumar Rana

Vs. Shri Deepika (Deepa) under Section 13 of

Hindu Marriage Act before the Chief Presiding

Officer, Family Court Kanpur vide Petition

No.98/2013 copy of which is annexed but after

coming to know about pendency of the case,

Deepika and her parents have filed a false

complaint on 23.3.2013 before the Crime against

Women Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi while making

wholly false allegations against me and my family

members and during such course, my wife had

stealthily removed the jewellery from my house

while giving the same to her mother and upon

demanding its return, she used to quarrel; on

6.1.2013 when I was all alone in the house, my

mother in law came from Delhi and forced me to

come to Delhi and on my refusal, when I had left

for office on 9.1.2013 at around 9.00 AM, my

mother in law left with Deepika while taking along

the cash amount of Rs.70-80 thousand and the

entire jewellery kept in the house; that on

10.3.2013 again my father in law, mother in law

and wife came and misbehaved with me and my

mother and violently attacked us while giving

threats to kill us and with the intent to put our

house on fire, they gutted one Sofa for which I

had filed the complaint under Section 156(3)

Cr.P.C. before the court of Hon’ble ACMM Ist

Kanpur on 18.4.2013; that after I initiated such

action on 23.1.2013, my wife and parents in law

filed various complaints exaggerating the

allegations which were found to be false upon

inquiry because had there been any truth in

either of such complaints, cases would have been

registered against me and my family members

both in Delhi or in Kanpur. My father was posted

out of station and upon assurances from wife and

parents in law that there will not be any future

complication, I used to accept my wife in the

household but again, she and her parents started

putting pressure on me for settling down in Delhi

while taking away my entire earnings; the petition

filed by me in Kanpur seeking decree of divorce

has since been transferred to Dwarka Courts in

Delhi on the directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court

where I had gone to attend the hearing since they

are residing in Delhi; they had also obtained the

settlement of dispute pending before the Crime

against Women Cell; on 2.7.2015, in the Divorce

Petition pending in Dwarka Courts my father in

law Mahavir Singh had admitted in writing that his

daughter Deepika was residing with Atul in

Kanpur and the case be dismissed. From the

written information given to the court by my father

in law, it is clear that his daughter Deepika and

Atul were happily residing in Delhi without there

being any harassment or pressure; that I had not

appended my signatures on the compromise in

court; my father in law has intentionally got the

petition dismissed; here I have to state also that

had I or any of my family members ever harassed

Deepika, my father in law would have brought this

matter to the notice of Hon’ble court; from the

above decision it is apparent that the court had

dismissed the petition only upon statement being

made by my wife’s father Mahavir Singh that

there were no complaints.

That the applicant’s maternal aunt and her

family are residing at Patel Nagar in Delhi. My

younger brother Prashant received his

appointment letter for the post of Civil Engineer

Site Engineer in Bangalore (copy attached) on

5.8.2014 for which I and my mother had to go to

Delhi and when my wife learnt about this, she

vehemently protested such visit while saying as

to why was I going to Delhi; that your mother and

brother can go on their own on which I told her

that being the elder son in the family, it was my

duty to accompany them and further that I had to

get my mother treated in Delhi but being enraged

from this, my wife immediately called her mother

and sister from Delhi and told me that she was

going to Delhi with her mother; upon my protest

for the reason that I had to take my mother to

Delhi for her treatment, both my wife and her

mother misbehaved with us using all sorts of

filthy language and threatened that if I went to

Delhi, they will enact rowdy and obscene

situation in the household of my maternal aunt

living in Patel Nagar Delhi because my wife and

parents in law did not wish me to maintain any

relationship with my own family. After this when I

alongwith my mother and brother reached my

maternal aunt’s house at Delhi Patel Nagar, my

father in law Mahavir Singh gave telephonic

threats to my maternal aunt while stating that if

they came to our rescue, they will also have to

bear the brunt of the situation; on hearing this my

material aunt told him to do whatever he liked but

she will get treatment for her sister and send her

back in four/five days. During this phone call,

Mahavir Singh had used all sorts of bad language

against my maternal aunt while fearing that she

may not register some complaint against him, etc.

but it was learnt later that he himself had filed a

complaint by making highly exaggerated

allegations while we had returned after seeing off

my brother and mother’s treatment for four/ five

days. Immediately upon our return my mother in

law talked to Mahavir Singh and my parents in

law forced me and my wife to live separate from

my family.

That during August, 2014, when we were

living in the ground floor after having been

separated from my old mother, my parents in law

took along my wife to Delhi whenever they wished

even without informing or obtaining my consent;

upon my protest, they pressurized and quarrelled

while preventing even my daughter to meet her

grand parents. In the first week of February, 2015

my mother came and on 8 th or 9th February, 2014

she took her to Delhi without my consent; I learnt

that my parents in law had got my pregnant wife

medically examined in a Nursing Home in Kanpur

and on 13th/14th February 2015 my parents in law

and sister in law Alka who is undergoing Nursing

Training managed to abort such pregnancy of my

wife in Gandhi Nursing Home Delhi without any

cause although it is a cognizable offence; I took

up the issue but all of them lied to me; when I

offered to take her back, she refused and told

that she will return on her own; my wife who had

left during February with her mother only returned

after five months during June when her mother

dropped her back; owing to the aforesaid abortion

I stopped talking to my wife and started living in

the upper floor; I had serious doubts about my

wife’s character but for fear of resultant insult I

did not talk to my parents about this; on 6 th 7th

July, 2015 my mother in law came to Kanpur and

started living with my wife; mother daughter due

started quarrelling with me often and under such

stress I informed my parents about the situation

and then my father talked to Mahavir Singh on

phone while asking him to come to Kanpur

because his wife and daughter were creating

havoc here and also that he had to clarify some

vital issues but Mahavir Singh did not take it

seriously because he himself was involved in all

this; and in a planned manner on 10.7.2015 at the

behest of Mahavir Singh, they levelled false

allegations to attempt to rape against my old

father who is 59 years 7 months old; presence of

me and my brother was also alleged although

mother in law was also present; for such

concocted allegations I have to submit further

that this incident is alleged to have taken place

on 17.7.2015 at 11.45 in the ground floor portion

of house; my wife was talking to her father

Mahavir Singh on his phone number 9818687941

while using her phone number 9807936466

almost daily and also using phone

No.8505817239 of mother in law Meera. On

17.7.2015 my wife had called her father from

phone No.9807936466 at 11.4.16 for 132

seconds; thereafter Mahavir Singh using his

phone number 9818687941 talked to Deepika at

her phone number 9807936466 at 11.55.32 for 62

seconds and again at 11.59.49 seconds for 33

seconds and at 12.03.28 for 50 seconds and

Mahavir Singh talked to his wife at 12.10.51 for

67 seconds. Similarly, mother in law Meera used

her phone number 8505817239 to call Deepika at

number 9807936466 at 11.49.27 and cut the call

immediately in one second and Mahavir Singh

calling from his phone number 9818687941 to

Meera’s phone number 8505817239 at 14.22.52

many times till 16.32.48. At the time of alleged

incident, Deepika and her mother Meera had their

location in Tower of Pashupati Nagar showing

them being together at that time but they had

never told Mahavir Singh about any such incident

taking place and no person from locality had any

information about such incident. They have

fabricated this false case. Upon Mahavir Singh

guiding his wife and Deepika she had made the

call to SO Naubasta on phone No.9454403741 at

12.31.47 after nearly three quarters of an hour.

According to conspiracy hatched by Mahavir

Singh, complaint about such frivolous attempt of

rape was sent. Copy of the print out showing call

details on 17.7.2015 by Deepika’s phone

No.9807936466 and Meera’s phone No.

8505817239 is attached when Mahavir Singh had

talked to both of them in detail. My sister is also

alleged to have been present although she has

been residing in Asansol West Bengal with her

husband.
 That I have to submit with regard to the

complaint under Section 504 IPC made on

18.7.2015 against my father by Shrimati Meera

that my mother in law Meera has been residing

with my wife for the last 10 days. Upon my father

being posted in out station, they used to abuse

me and my mother but she advised me not to say

anything to them while we continued to bear all

this for fear of damage to our social standing.

Once my wife and mother in law seriously

misbehaved with my mother while my father was

out of station; my mother told me when I informed

my father on phone but he advised me not to do

anything; such recording is annexed. My father is

a heart patient; in the morning of 18.7.2015 I and

my younger brother took our father to the doctor

when all of a sudden my wife accompanied by

mother in law, father in law Mahavir Singh and

another man came at 8.45 AM and continued their

threats and violent misbehaviour with my mother

and even tried to resort to physical violence; on

our return we went to Naubasta police station.

Mahavir Singh, my wife and mother in law and 5/6

other men were already there and intended to

lodge a false report; my wife had misbehaved

even in the presence of my father while my

mother in law was talking in a violent manner;

when my father and others came out of the police

station, my mother in law Meera hurled a taunt

which led to exchange of hot words between my

father and mother in law but nothing happened

relating to my wife but my father did not lodge

any report despite such insults hurled against him

and violence against my mother only to save his

honour; when we learnt that my mother in law had

lodged the NCR No.106/15 against my father only

then he lodged the report about misbehaviour and

violence committed against my mother vide NCR

No.107/15 under Sections 352/504 IPC on behalf

of my mother Shrimati Vimla against my wife

Deepika, mother in law Meera and father in law

Mahavir Singh and one other unknown person.

Sir, right from the beginning, I have been

implicated in a planned manner; when I had gone

to see my would be wife, she was a healthy girl

and her BA marks sheet was shown; after

marriage when I asked her to study for MA, my

parents in law scoffed at the idea and continued

making excuses; In the year 2010 after marriage

they produced her High School marks sheet

showing her date of birth being 21.7.1993; thus

her age at the time of marriage was merely 14

years; this angle is also being investigated in

Delhi; copy of marks sheet is annexed while a

simultaneous investigation is being conducted

into their illegal act of abortion carried out in

Delhi with the help of her parents and sister;

copies of applications filed are annexed.

My wife’s younger sister Alka was married in

the year 2013 in village Mirhachi District Etah;

after that marriage, my father in law, mother in

law had attempted to lodge a complaint about

rape and dowry harassment against her brothers

in law (Devar and Jeth), father in law and other

womenfolk of the household but when it was not

recorded, the Crime against Women Cell was

approached in Delhi and by using the clout of SI

Jaswant Singh, FIR No.699/14 PS Najafgarh was

registered under Sections 498-A/506/406 IPC

while Mahavir Singh had recovered nearly 12-13

lakh rupees from the groom’s family before the

final report followed by divorce; complaints had

been filed by me against SI Jaswant Singh with

the DCP, CAW Cell; recording of discussion

taking place with Suraj Pal Singh who had

negotiated our marriage is also annexed which

shows that neither I nor my family had taken any

vehicle or dowry; mobile phone recording relating

to the threats hurled at me by my wife and also

about threats being given by my father in law

Mahavir Singh with his relative Pappu which

relates to violence being committed against me,

my family and implicating us in false criminal

cases is also annexed.

My father is aged 59 years 7 months who is

presently posted in Anti Corruption Department

Kanpur; he has been undergoing treatment since

2007 in AIIMS Delhi and SGPGI, Lucknow; he had

undergone Angioplasty requiring four Stents in

his heart and has to take insulin injections twice

daily; My father was awarded Commendation

Certificate and granted gold medal for bravery

during his service tenure by the Hon’ble Governor

and the President’s medal for long and

meritorious service; my mother is aged 57 years

who is suffering from acute arthritis pains;

younger brother Prashant has done B.Tech. Civil

Engineering and is serving in Goa and had

returned home owing to my father’s illness; I have

only one sister who has done her M.A., B.Ed. and

is happily married and living with her husband in

Asansol Bengal where he is an Engineer with

SAIL. Mahavir Singh is trying to implicate my

family in false criminal cases and right since our

marriage, they have been filing one complaint

after the other with the malafide intent to extort

huge amount of money from us but have failed till

date and have thus been making exaggerated

allegations against me and now they are

demanding Rs.25.0 lakhs for grant of divorce;

recording thereof is separately annexed wherein

they have threatened to falsely implicate us upon

our failure to pay; I and my father had deposited

sums of Rs.10,000/- each on 6.9.2010, 2.2.2011,

4.3.2011 upon my wife reaching Delhi, copy of

such bank statement is annexed; Mahavir Singh

is a drunkard having the traits of a broker; had

been a leader in BSP and now claims himself to

be a leader in AAP party; getting a meagre salary

and intends to lodge false complaints; I have

once again filed the petition for obtaining divorce;

my wife has also filed complaint against me in

Crime against Women Cell, Nanakpura wherein I

have appeared and the matter is pending inquiry.

DESCRIPTION OF MAIN POINTS RECORDED

DURING TELEPHONIC DISCUSSIONS

1. Wife Deepika calling from phone number

9807936466 to husband Atul on phone

number 9889605692 telling him not to call

her mother or father otherwise she will

ruin the life of husband’s sister, send her

to jail, send every person to jail, sent your

mother and father to jail, will approach

court and authorities and you must not

have ever imagined what is going to befall

on you.
2. From phone No.9540511255 of Suraj Pal

Singh who negotiated the marriage to

Rajaram Singh Rana’s phone

No.9984865986 wherein Suraj Pal admits

the marriage having been performed

without any dowry; that Mahavir Singh

listens only to his wife which had led to a

similar dispute in Miraichi from where they

have recovered Rs.12.0 lakhs; that he has

similar plans here and is thus ruing the

relations.

3. From Mahavir Singh, wife’s father’s phone

No. 9818687941 to relative Pappu’s phone

No.9719111559 saying “I will drag Atul

and his mother to the road and beat them

and while using filthy abuses, he tells that

he will finish Atul’s life and that he has

plans to ruin the entire family and get their

entire estate transferred to his name.

4. Mahavir Singh, father in law’s known-to

person SI Jaswant Singh calling Veerpal

Singh and discussing the matter which

 was later conveyed by Virpal Singh from

his phone No.9811887114 to Atul’s phone

No. 9889605692 where Jaswant Singh had

told him to arrange payment of Rs.25.0

lakhs from Atul to Mahavir Singh after

which he will stop all this drama; to this

Atul had replied that he does not have that

kind of money and cannot commit a

robbery for such purpose.

From all these records, it becomes clear that

the applicant is absolutely innocent and that

those people and maliciously attempting to

implicate them in false cases and an illegal

demand of Rs.25.0 lakhs is being made from his

family; the allegations levelled by my wife in

conspiracy with her parents against the applicant,

his father, mother and brother on 17.7.2015 about

dowry harassment and cruelty were investigated

by the erstwhile Incharge (Deputy S.P.) Govind

Nagar Kanpur but during such investigation, no

evidence about involvement of either of them in

such offences was found; report dated 30.7.2015

of the Station Officer Govind Nagar is annexed;

when Mahavir Singh’s complaints had failed in

Delhi he has started filing complaints here by

making more serious but false allegations;

therefore justice be given to the applicant

because the applicant and his family are

absolutely innocent.

Upon interrogation of complainant’s father in

law Shri Rajaram Singh Rana S/o Late A.R.Singh,

Inspector, Anti Corruption Department Kanpur

resident of House No.128/10140, Y Block, Kidwai

Nagar, PS Naubasta District Kanpur City, he has

stated that: My son Atul Rana’s marriage was

solemnized with Deepika D/o Mahavir Singh

resident of Najafgarh, Delhi in the year 2007

according to Hindu religious rites and customs

without any dowry; right after such marriage,

daughter in law Deepika and her mother Meera

and father Mahavir Singh had wished that my son

should settle down in Delhi which was resented

by my son because in my family, my younger son

was doing his B.Tech. in Lucknow and daughter

had been married; I was posted out of station; my

son’s in laws had caused serious harassment and

under force of circumstances, my son had filed

for divorce, etc. In the year 2014, his in-laws

caused separation of husband/wife but still

continued to press him to shift to Delhi which

attempt was opposed by my son; mother of

daughter in law came alongwith her father and

harassed my son; they used to take away

whatever he had earned; on 17.7.2015 I had left

home in my car at about 10.00 in the morning for

attending the service call of laying a trap being

SI. Anti Corruption Department unit in Kanpur; it

was a day for Eid Namaaz and it was raining; I

met my Senior Inspector Shri Satyendra Mishra

having discussions and deciding that since the

weather was bad, trap could not be laid; in a

hurry, I had left my mobile back home. After

having discussions and considering pros and

cons with Shri Satyendra Mishra, I returned home

after 12.00 noon when my wife Vimla Rani

reported with a heavy heart that after all of us

had left and finding her alone in the house,

daughter in law Deepika and her mother had

resorted to acute filthy abuses gathering the

Mohalla people and had gone to PS Naubasta

after threatening that she will implicate all of us

today in false criminal cases and when she tried

to contact me, she realized that I had left my

phone for charging at home and thus she could

not report the matter immediately; immediately

after reaching home at 12.00 I contacted the SO

Naubasta through phone No.9454403741 and

reported about such ill treatment against my wife

and about threats to implicate all of us in false

cases. I, Inspector had left home on 17.7.2015 at

about 10.00 AM and had remained with my senior

Inspector Shri Satyendra Kumar Mishra till 12.00

noon at a distance of nearly 1.5 kilometre from

my residence; that the applicant was not home at

the time of alleged occurrence; this has been

witnessed by neighbours and shop keepers and

those people had told me that during my absence,

your daughter in law and sister in law (Samdhin)

had seriously misbehaved with your wife and had

left after giving threats.

Shri Satyendra Kumar Mishra, Inspector, Anti

Corruption Department, Kanpur City had stated

that in compliance with the directions of the

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption

Department, Kanpur regarding laying of trap on

17.7.2015, SI Rajaram Singh had remained with

me from about 10.00 AM till 12.00 noon but owing

to bad weather and failure of the complainant to

arrive, I allowed Shri Rana to return while telling

him that if the complainant arrived, he will

intimate him; that he had waited till evening but

owing to intermittent rain, the complainant did not

come; that he had remained with me on 17.7.2015

from 10.00 to 12.00 hours at a place which is

nearly 1.5 kilometre from his residence and after

that period, he had gone home.

Independent witnesses namely Abhishek

Mishra @ Nutan S/o Shri Hari Prasad Mishra R/o

128/1018 Y Block, Kidwai Nagar, PS.Naubasta,

Kanpur city, Km. Moni S/o Shri Munshi Lal,

resident of 154, Rajiv Vihar, PS.Naubasta Kanpur

City, Shri Raju Singh S/o Shri S.Narain, resident

of House No.38/B, Dhari ka Purwa, PS.Naubasta,

Kanpur City, Shri Pawan Singh S/o Shri Gian

Singh R/o 146, MIG Dabauli, Kanpur City were

also interrogated who had disclosed in their

statements that on 17.7.2015, Atul Kumar Rana’s

wife and her mother had quarrelled with Atul

Rana’s mother and left for some place after

giving threats of implicating them in criminal

cases while talking on phone. When this skirmish

had taken place, Atul Rana and his father Shri

Rajaram Singh Rana were not home; when Atul’s

wife and mother in law had left the house, both of

them had returned home; that Atul Rana and his

wife have been separated by his parents in law.

ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE – CONCLUSION

During the course of investigation, the

complainant Shrimati Deepika and the opposite

party her husband Shri Atul Kumar Rana and

father in law Shri Rajaram Singh were also

interrogated and the available documents were

examined which had thrown light on the facts that

the complainant was married with the opposite

party Atul Kumar Rana S/o Shri Rajaram Singh

Rana resident of 128/1040, Block Y, Kidwai

Nagar, PS Chaubasta, Kanpur in the year 2007;

that the complainant had smooth relations with

her husband and in-laws and that complainant

has one daughter Mishti aged about 5 years who

is living with complainant in her maternal home;

complainant pressurized her husband to start

business in Delhi which he refused; the

complainant wished that her husband should

follow her wishes and settle down in Delhi but

upon reluctance of the complainant’s husband to

accept this demand, differences arose between

complainant and her husband which started a

chain of complaints against each other and the

complainant went to her parental home; the

complainant often used to go to Delhi without

intimating or obtaining the consent of anyone on

which husband of the complainant Shri Atul

Kumar Rana had filed a petition for divorce

before the Family Court Kanpur City vide case

No.98/2013 before the Chief Family Court Kanpur

City which was got transferred to Delhi by the

complainant; on 2.7.2015, complainant’s father

Mahavir Singh had himself recorded in divorce

proceedings that his daughter Deepika and Atul

were living happily in Kanpur without any

complaints or pressure from anyone. On this the

Hon’ble Court had dismissed the case. In the

compromise, signatures of petitioner Atul Kumar

were not obtained which fact has been stated by

Atul Kumar himself; had the opposite party

harassed Shrimati Deepika, then her father

Mahavir Singh would have brought this fact to the

notice of Hon’ble Court; From the aforesaid

judgment, it is clear that the complainant’s father

Mahavir Singh had made the statement in court

that “there is no complaint” and only then the

Hon’ble Court had dismissed the case. Thereafter

both the parties had compromised their disputes

and the complainant started living with her

husband separately; that the complainant’s

mother Smt. Meera W/o Mahavir Singh R/o B-39,

Indira Park Najafgarh New Delhi came to her

daughter’s matrimonial home in Kanpur and on

17.7.2015 and quarrelled with her in-laws. On the

basis of the written complaint filed by

complainant’s mother Shrimati Meera about such

disputes between the parties, NCR No.106/15

under Section 504 IPC was registered on

18.7.2015 in PS.Naubasta against Rajaram Singh

Rana. The complainant alongwith her parents and

one unidentified person had resorted to violence

against her mother in law Shrimati Vimla Rana

and tried to beat her up and on the basis of

written complaint filed by Shrimati Vimla Rana

W/o Shri Rajaram Singh Rana resident of

128/1040, Y-Block, Kidwai Nagar PS Naubasta,

Kanpur City, an NCR No.107/15 under Sections

352/504 IPC was registered against 1.Deepika

D/o Mahavir, Meera W/o Mahavir Singh and

Mahavir Singh besides one unidentified person;

complainant’s husband Atul Kumar Rana had filed

a case before the Family Court Kanpur City

seeking divorce vide case No.140/2015 before

the Chief Family Court which had been re-filed

and is pending adjudication by the court. The

complainant had recorded during her statement

that on 17.7.2015, her in laws had resorted to

beat and abuse her, had torn her clothes and her

father in law Rajaram Singh Rana had tried to

commit rape on her. With regard to this

allegation, it is to be clarified that on 17.7.2015,

complainant’s father in law Shri Rajaram Singh

Rana who is posted as Inspector in Anti

Corruption Deptt. in Kanpur had left home for

duty before 10.00 AM from where he had formed

a team upon instructions of the Deputy

Superintendent of Police to trap one person; in

this behalf, the Deputy S.P. Anti Corruption

Department Kanpur had produced a certificate

and Shri Satyendra Kumar Mishra, Inspector Anti

Corruption Branch Kanpur Unit who was in the

said Trap Team had also disclosed in his

statement that he had gone home sometime after

12.00 noon; other Mohalla residents and

shopkeepers had also stated upon interrogation

that Atul Kumar Rana’s wife and mother in law

had quarrelled with Shrimati Vimla Devi; that Atul

Kumar Rana and his father Shri Rajaram Singh

Rana were not at home; upon returning home, his

wife had reported about the incident on which he

called the SO Naubasta on his telephone number

while reporting that his daughter in law and her

mother had seriously misbehaved with his wife

and had threatened to implicate the family

members in false criminal cases which fact is

also evident from his statement; thus no such

evidence has come to the fore which could

support the allegations of attempt to commit rape

on the complainant by Shri Rajaram Singh Rana;

that complainant’s younger sister Alka had also

been married during 2013 with Sunil Kumar S/o

Hoshiar Singh resident of village and PS.Miraichi

Distt. Etah who also had lodged an FIR

No.699/14 under Sections 498-A/

376/354/506/406/34 Indian Penal Code in Police

Station Najafgarh against her husband, parents in

law and Devar wherein factum of arriving at a

financial settlement by complainant father and

mother Shrimati Meera has come to the fore

during recording of statements. Complainant had

gone to Delhi on 26.7.2015 alongwith her parents

after collecting her belongings and had filed a

complaint with the Deputy Commissioner of

Police, Crime against Women Cell, Nanakpura,

Moti Bagh, New Delhi which is pending

investigation, wherein the opposite party Atul

Kumar Rana has been called upon to show cause;

Complainant’s husband Shri Atul Kumar Rana had

filed a divorce petition No.140 of 2015 under

Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act before the

Additional Chief, Family Court, Kanpur which is

pending adjudication. Both parties are involved in

this family dispute which has been going on for

quite some time. From the investigation till date,

no tangible evidence has come to the fore which

could support the allegations made by the

complainant in her complaint.

Report is submitted accordingly.

Sd/- Vishal Pandeya

Station Officer, Govind Nagar

Kanpur City

Encl: As above

Dated: August 26, 2015

Certified to be true copy

Sd/- Illegible 4.9.2015

Incharge, Public Information Cell

District Kanpur City
The Senior Superintendent of Police
Kanpur City

Kindly refer to your endorsement Order

No.SSO-C-15-189/15 dated 25.7.2015 which

pertains to conducting of the investigation in the

complaint filed by the complainant Shrimati

Deepika Rana W/o Shri Atul Kumar Rana,

resident of 128/1048, Y-Block, Kidwai Nagar, PS.

Naubasta Kanpur City and to file the report.

ALLEGATIONS

The complainant above named has mainly

recorded in her complaint that on 17.7.2015,

when she was at home and her mother had also

come from Delhi because of continuing dowry

harassment and beatings by her father in law,

husband, mother in law, Devar for bringing

insufficient dowry. Prior to this also, those people

had been beating her and had turned her out of

the matrimonial home. Thereafter, they had

arrived at a compromise before the Crime against

Women Cell that these people would not resort to

any mental or physical harassment but that these

people had started treating her with more cruelty,

etc.

DESCRIPTION OF INVESTIGATION

During the course of investigation, people

concerned were interrogated and the documents

made available were perused. The complainant

had appeared before me alongwith her parents

and told that her husband is not residing with her

but is residing upstairs with his mother; that

complainant’s marriage was solemnized with

opposite party Atul Kumar Rana S/o Shri Rajaram

Singh Rana resident of 128/1040, Block Y, Kidwai

Nagar, PS.Naubasta Kanpur City in the year

2007. For some time the complainant had cordial

relations with her husband and other members of

in laws’ family and that the complainant has one

daughter named Mishti aged about 5 years who is

staying with the complainant in her parental

home; that the complainant had brought pressure

upon her husband to settle down in Delhi but

upon refusal of the complainant’s husband to

accept such demand of the complainant, serious

differences arose between parties and both of

them started making allegations and counter

allegations against each other and the

complainant returned to her parental home. The

complainant used to accompany her mother for

going to Delhi without consent of anyone on

which the complainant’s husband Shri Atul Kumar

Rana had filed the divorce petition before the

Family Court, Kanpur City on the basis of

allegations against his wife and her family

members of resorting to violence, etc. which

matter is pending adjudication. Thereafter both

parties had compromised and the complainant

returned to live separately but in the matrimonial

home. Complainant’s mother Shrimati Meera W/o

Shri Mahavir Singh had attempted to abuse and

physically attack against which a written

complaint was filed by Shrimati Vimla Rana W/o

Shri Rajaram Singh resident of 128/1040, Y

Block, Kidwai Nagar, PS.Naubasta, Kanpur City

which was registered as NCR No.107/15 under

Sections 352/504 IPC against Mahavir Singh etc.

three persons besides one person unnamed.

Complainant’s husband Atul Kumar Rana had also

filed a Divorce Petition against the complainant in

Family Court, Kanpur. On 17.7.2014, the

complainant and her mother had threatened to

implicate in false cases. Complainant’s younger

sister Alka was married with Sunil Kumar S/o

Hoshiar Singh resident of village and PS.

Miraichi, Distt. Etah during 2013 who had lodged

an FIR No.699/14 under Sections

498-A/376/354/506/34 IPC in PS. Najafgarh,

Delhi against her husband, parents in law and

Devar and during investigation, it has come to

light that this case had been settled by

complainant’s father and mother Shrimati Meera

after collecting money. The complainant had left

with her parents for Delhi on 26.7.2015 after

collecting her belongings. No evidence

corroborating the allegations of the complainant

in her complaint about dowry harassment or

beatings or abusive conduct causing physical and

mental harassment has come to the fore during

the investigations conducted in the matter.

Report is submitted accordingly for your kind

perusal.
 Sd/- O.P.Singh
Station Officer Govind Nagar
Kanpur City

Encl: As above

Dated: July, 2015

Certified to be true copy

Sd/- Illegible date illegible

Incharge, Public Information Cell

District Kanpur City