838
Abstract  This  paper  describes  the  design  and  fabrication 
of  single  phase  capacitor  run  induction  motor  in  an  optimized 
manner  using  Perturb  and  Observe  (P&O  technique)  to 
enhance  the  efficiency  of  existing  design.  Output  power  of  the 
induction motor is directly proportional to the active volume of 
the material ie, D
2
L of the motor. Where D is the diameter and 
L is the length of the motor. The value of D
2
L can be calculated 
for  the  different  values  of  D  and  L.  But  P&O  technique  helps 
us to select the optimal value of D and L combination in order 
to achieve the maximum efficiency.   A generalized algorithm is 
developed  for  the  design  of  stator  core  stamping,  rotor  core 
stamping,  main  winding,  die-cast  rotor,  auxiliary  winding  and 
capacitor value in an optimized manner using P&O Technique. 
Based  on  that,  dedicated  software  is  developed  in  MATLAB 
and  various  design  parameters  are  obtained  for  75W,  220V, 
50Hz, 4 pole capacitor run induction motor. In order to verify 
the  designed  parameters  a  steady  state  mathematical  model of 
the motor is developed using double field revolving theory and 
it  is  simulated  in  MATLAB/SIMULINK  platform.  Based  on 
the  obtained  optimal  designed  parameters,  different  parts  of 
the  motor  are  fabricated  and  the  fabricated  motor  is  tested 
successfully  in  the  electrical  laboratory.  Output  performances 
of both simulation and experimentation are also investigated in 
this paper.  
Index  Terms  Single  Phase  Capacitor  Run  Induction 
Motor  (SCRIM),  Perturb  and  Observe  (P&O  technique), 
Trickeys  Balanced  Approach,  Optimal  Design,  Steady  State 
Model.  
I.  INTRODUCTION 
Numbers  of  single  phase  induction  motor  are  being 
manufactured  every  year  in  the  country.  These  motors  are 
very  popular  in  the  early  1930s  for  application  requiring 
high  starting  and  running  torques.  These  motors  are  very 
widely  used  in  the  industry  especially  in  fractional  kilowatt 
range because of their size, cost, weight, reliability and ease 
of maintenance. They are extensively used for electric drive 
for  low  power  constant  speed  applications  such  as  machine 
tools,  domestic  appliance,  agricultural  machinery  and  other 
heavy-duty  uses  in  circumstances  where  a  three  phase 
supply  is  not  readily  available.  Of  all  types  of  single  phase 
induction  motor,  the  capacitor  run  induction  motor  is  the 
most popular and widely used because of their good starting 
and running characteristics. [1- 5]  
In  general,  Single  phase  induction  motor  is  working  in  low 
efficiency  because  of  their  high  copper  loss,  improper 
design of auxiliary winding and rude capacitance value. This 
paper discusses a new approach for the design optimization 
of single phase capacitor run induction motor using Perturb 
and Observe Technique for efficiency enhancement.                                                    
Author of this paper is with the Department of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineering,  School  of  Engineering,  Amrita  Vishwa  Vidyapeetham 
Univesity, Ettimadai, Coimbatore  641 105.  phone: 0422 2652422e-mail: 
sundaratamil@rediffmail.com.  
II.  OPTIMAL DESIGN OF SCRIM 
The efficiency of the motor depends on active volume of the 
material,  ie,  D
2
L.  The  value  of  D
2
L  can  be  calculated  for 
various  values  of  D  and  L.  By  using  P  &  O  technique  the 
optimal  values  of  D  and  L  combination  is  selected  to 
achieve maximum efficiency. Initially, stator core stamping, 
rotor core stamping, main winding, auxiliary winding and a 
capacitor is designed for the ratting of 75W, 220V, 50Hz, 4 
pole  capacitor  run  induction  motor  suitable  for  fan  type 
load. D and L values are decremented and incremented step 
by  step  accordingly  to  achieve  the  maximum  efficiency.    
Various  steps  involved  in  the  design  of  the  motor  is 
explained clearly in the following figure 1.                                          
Fig. 1: Various Steps Involved in the Design of SCRIM 
Kumaravel S 
DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE PHASE CAPACITOR 
RUN INDUCTION MOTOR  
Performance 
calculation 
new
  > 
old 
old
 = 
new
 
Print Result 
Stop 
D = D  
L = L + 
Start 
Read the input parameters 
Design of Stator Core, Rotor 
Core, Main winding and 
Die-cast rotor 
P
rated
 = 
P
calc 
Design of Auxiliary winding 
and Capacitance value using 
Trikeys Balanced Approach 
A B
A B
XXXII NATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, NSC  2008, December 17-19, 2008
  839
III.STEADY STATE MODEL OF SCRIM 
A. Mathematical Model of SCRIM 
The  steady  state  model  of  single  phase  capacitor  run 
induction  motor  is  developed  on  the  basis of balanced  two-
phase  machine  model  as  shown  in  figure  2.  The  machine 
consists of balanced two-phase windings on both stator and 
rotor and a uniform air gap.  
 
The  stator  windings  are  designated  D  and  Q,  and  the  rotor 
windings   and  .  The  axis  of  the   -phase  winding  and 
that of the D winding are at an angle    which increases as 
the  rotor  revolves  in  a  counter-clockwise  direction.     is 
thus  a  function  of  time  and  dt d ,  which  will  again  be 
written  
.
 is the angular velocity of the rotor relative to the 
stator. 
 
 
Fig. 2: Balanced Two-Phase Machine with Uniform Air-gap 
The following differential equation describing the operation 
of two-phase induction motor with all the variables referred 
to stator and is given below: 
(   )   (   )
(   )   (   )
  (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
+  
    +  
  +
+
=
qr
i
dr
i
a
i
m
i
D
r
X
r
R s
r
X D
m
X
s
a s
m
X
s
r
X D
r
X
r
R s
m
X
s
a D
m
X
D
m
X
s
a D
a
X
a
R
D
m
X D
s
X
s
R
a
v
m
v
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0
0
 The above equation can be simplified and rewritten in state-
space matrix form as: 
|   |
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
=
(
(
(
(
(
(
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
1
c
V
r
V
r
V
s
V
s
V
A
a
v
m
v
c
V
r
V
r
V
s
V
s
V
D
 
Where 
;
1 dr
i
m
X
m
i
s
X
s
V   + =
         
            
;
2 qr
i
m
X
s
a
a
i
a
X
s
V   + =
     
             ;
1 m
i
m
X
dr
i
r
X
r
V   + =          
            
;
2 a
i
m
X
s
a
qr
i
r
X
r
V   + =
     
            
; /
1 c
X
c
v
c
V   =
 
|   | A  is a 5x 5 matrix and is given by: 
 
(   )
(   )
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
1
2
0
0 1
1
0
1
2
0
2
0
0 0
1
0
1
K
m
X
s
a K
r
X
K
a
X
r
R s K
m
X
r
R
s
a
s K
s
X
r
R K
m
X
r
R
c
X K
m
X
a
R
s
a K
r
X
a
R
K
m
X
s
R K
r
X
s
R
 
where, K
1
 and K
2
 are the constant expressed as follows, 
|
.
|
\
|
  
=
2
1
1
m
X
r
X
s
X
K
and
(   )
2 2 2
1
m s r a
X a X X
K
=  
The expressions for the 2-phase (main, auxiliary, rotor direct 
and  quadrature)  currents  in  terms  of  the  new  vectors  are 
given by:  
2
).
2
(
1
).
1 1
(
2
).
2 2
(
1
).
1 1
(
K
s
V
m
X
s
a
r
V
a
X
qr
i
K
s
V
m
X
r
V
s
X
dr
i
K
r
V
m
X
s
a
s
V
r
X
a
i
K
r
V
r
X
s
V
r
X
m
i
 =
   =
   =
   =
 
The expression for the capacitor voltage 
c
v  is given by: 
c
X
c
V
c
v
1
=
The  expression  for  the  electromagnetic  torque  is 
given by: 
) (
dr
i
a
i
s
a
qr
i
m
i
m
X
e
T    =
    
This  developed  mathematical  model  is  simulated  in 
MATLAB/SIMULINK platform. Figure 3 shows the layout 
of  developed  model  simulation  in  MATLAB/  SIMULINK 
platform.  
 
Fig. 3: Layout of Developed Model of Single Phase Capacitor Run 
Induction Motor in MATLAB/ SIMULINK Platform 
IV.DESIGNED OPTIMAL PARAMETERS OF RATED 
SPCRIM 
Different  parameters  of  optimal  capacitor  run  induction 
motor  is  found  by  the  developed  algorithm  using  P&O 
Technique.  Table 1. shows the important parameters of the 
motor which is designed optimally using P&O Technique.   
TABLE.1 
S.n Symbol  Parameter  Value 
1  D  Stator Outer diameter   3.5 
2  D
1 
Stator inner diameter  1.8 
  840
3  L
1 
Stator Core Length  0.8 
4  g  Air Gap Length  10mm 
5  S
1 
No; of  Stator Slots  24 
6  D
2 
Rotor Outer diameter  1.79 
7  S
2 
No; Rotor Slots  18 
8  C
1 
No; Main wind conductors  6718 
9  d 
1 
Wire cage of C
1
  (SWG)  32 
10  C
r 
No; Rotor Bars   18 
11  a  Turns Ratio  1.12 
12  C
2 
No; Auxiliary wind. Condu.  7524 
13  d 
2 
Aux. Winding cage (SWG)  36 
14  X
c 
Capacitive Reactance  1498 
V.FABRICATION OF DESIGNED MOTOR 
A.  Selection Of Motor Stamping 
In  practice,  optimally  designed  motor  is  difficult  to 
fabricate.  Because  it  require more  dying  and  manufacturing 
cost,  when  single  number  is  concern.  So,  the  different 
standard  stampings  available  in  the  market  are  collected. 
Different  design  parameters  like  outer  diameter,  inner 
diameter, number of slots, width of slots, etc., are measured 
for  the  collected  stampings.  Performances  of  the  collected 
stamping  are  analyzed  using  the  dedicated  software  by 
tacking  the  above  measured  values  as  reference  and 
obtained performances are compared. In the comparison, the 
performance of AL3 stamping is suitable for our design. The 
fabrication  work  is  carried  out  for  single  phase,  75  W,  220 
V,  50  Hz,  4  pole  capacitor  run  induction  motor  using  the 
selected  standard  AL3  stamping.  Figure  4  shows  the  AL3 
stamping.  
 
 
(a)                                      (b) 
Fig.  4: AL3 stamping (a) Stator (b) Rotor 
B. Fabrication of Aluminum die-cast rotor 
Stator  and  rotor  core  are  fabricated  with  a  core  length  of 
0.8cm  by  silicon  steel  (hot  rol)  using  AL3  stamping. 
Aluminum  die-cast  rotor  is  made  by  die-casting  melted 
aluminum  conductor  over  the  fabricated  rotor  core.  After 
fabricating  a  die-cast  rotor,  a  suitable  rotor  shaft  should  be 
designed  in  AUTO  CAD  software.  Figure  5.a  shows  rotor 
shaft  drawing  for  a  fabricated  aluminum  die-cast  rotor. 
According  to  the drawing  rotor  shaft is manufactured and 
 
                      (a)                                                 (b) 
Fig. 5: Aluminum Die-Cast Rotor (a) Shaft Drawing (b)Fabricated 
Aluminum Die-Cast Rotor 
then  integrated  with  aluminum  die-cast  rotor  and  fine 
finishing  process  is  carried  out.  Balance  test  is  conducted 
over  the  rotor  to  reduce  the  vibration  during  normal 
operation.  Suitable  bearings  are  selected  and  connected  at 
two  ends  of  the  rotor.  Figure  5.b  shows  the  fabricated 
aluminum die-cast rotor. 
B.  Main And Auxiliary Winding 
According  to  the  design  32  SWG,  silicon  cotton  enamel 
copper wire with 8 coils and are distributed by two coils per 
pole  as  one  inner  coil  and  an  outer  coil.  Outer  and  inner 
coils wound with 338 turns and are inserted with a coil span 
of  1-6  and  2-5.  For  the  auxiliary  winding,  36  SWG,  silicon 
cotton  enamel  copper  wire  is  selected.  Auxiliary  winding 
has  4  coils;  each  has 940  turns  and  is  inserted  in  stator  slot 
with a coil span of 1-6. Figure 6.a shows the designed main 
and  auxiliary  winding  and  Figure  6.b  shows  the  fabricated 
main and auxiliary winding.  
 
                      (a)                                                (b) 
Fig. 6: Main And Auxiliary Windings (a) Designed Motor   
(b)Fabricated Motor 
 
V. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE 
FABRICATED MOTOR 
The fabricated motor is tested in the laboratory by applying 
220V,  50Hz,  single  phase  AC  supply  as  shown  in  figure  7. 
The  performance  of  fabricated  motor  is  computed  and 
results  are  compared  with  simulated  results  of  the  designed 
motor.  Table  2  shows  the  comparison  of  different 
parameters of both simulation and experimental results.  
  841
 
Fig. 7: Experimental setup of the fabricated motor 
Different  waveforms  such  as  motor  terminal  voltage,  input 
current, main winding current, auxiliary winding current and 
capacitor  voltage  are  observed  using  digital  C.R.O.  and  the 
observed  wave  forms  are  reproduced  in  figure  8.  Figure  8 
also  shows  the  different  output  waveform  comparison 
between  simulated  and  experimental  results.  It  can  be  seen 
that the both the waveforms are resemble each other.  
Observed  waveforms  and  the  tabulated  results  prove  that, 
the  fabricated  motor  is  working  with  enhanced  efficiency. 
The  comparison  is  made  between  fabricated  motor  and 
existing  motor  in  table  2.  It  also  proves  that  the  new 
fabricated  motor  is  better  in  the  efficiency  than  existing 
motor. 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)                                                  (b) 
Fig. 8: Computed Wave Forms (a) Simulated Motor  (b)Fabricated 
Motor 
VI. CONCLUSION 
In  general,  Single  phase  induction  motor  is  working  in  low 
efficiency  because  of  their  high  copper  loss,  improper 
design of auxiliary winding and rude capacitance value. This 
paper discusses a new approach for the design optimization 
of single phase capacitor run induction motor using Perturb 
and  Observe  Technique  for  efficiency  enhancement.  The 
observed wave forms and test results prove that the designed 
motor  is  operating  with  improved  efficiency  compared  to 
the existing motor.  
 
 Kumaravel  S  was  born  in  veerasingampettai, 
Thanjavur  (dist),  Tamilnadu  at  15.07.1981.  He 
completed  his  B.E  (EEE)  from  Bharathidasan 
University,  Tiruchirappalli,  Tamilnadu  during  May 
2002  and    M.tech  (Power  Systems)  from  National 
Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli during June 
2007.  So  for  he  is  having  6  and  half  years  of 
teaching experience. 
After his graduation, he worked as a lecturer at M.Kumarasamy College of 
Engineering, Karur for 5 years. At present he is with School of engineering, 
Amrita  Vishwa  Vidyapeetham  University,  Ettimadai,  Coimbatore, 
Tamilnadu  from  June  2007.  He  has  presented  technical  papers  two  in 
International  Conference  and  four  in  National  Conference.  His  area  of 
interest  is  in  the  field  of  Incorporation  of  power  converters  in  renewable 
energy sources. He is a life member in I.S.T.E 
REFERENCES 
[1] Huang, H., Fuchs, E.F., White, J.C. (1988), "Optimal placement of run 
capacitor in single phase induction motor design", IEEE Transactions on 
Energy Conversion, Vol. 3 No.3, pp.647-52.  
[2] Huang, H., Fuchs, E.F., Zak, Z. (1998b), "Optimization of single phase 
induction motor design  part-I formulation of the optimization technique", 
IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 3 No.2, pp.349-56.  
[3]  Subramanian,  S.,  Bhuvaneswari,  R.  (2005),  "Optimization  of  single-
phase induction motor design using evolutionary programming", Journal of 
Systems Science and Engineering-PARITANTRA, Vol. 12 pp.30-7. 
[4]Crystal.G.Veinott,  (1959),  Theory  and  Design  of  Small  Induction 
Motors,  McGRAW-HILL  Book  Company,  INC,  Newyark,  I  Edition,  Page 
262-429. 
[5]  R.K.Agarwal,  (2000),  Principles  of  Electrical  Machine  Design, 
S.K.Kataria & Sons, Delhi, IV Edition, Page 366-398. 
[6]  Stephen  D.  Umans,  Steady-State,  Lumped-Parameter  Model  for 
Capacitor-Run,  Single-phase  Induction  Motors,  IEEE  Transactions  on 
Industry Applications. Vol. 32, No. 1, Januaryfebruary 1996 
[7] D. P. Hohm and M. E. Ropp, Comparative Study of Maximum Power 
Point  Tracking  Algorithms,  Progress  In  Photovoltaics:  Research  And 
Applications Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2003; 11:4762 
[8] S.Kumaravel, Optimal Design and Fabrication of Single Phase 
Capacitor Run Induction Motor, Proceedings on Resource Utilization and 
Intelligence Systems, Kongu Engineering College, Tamilnadu India. Res: 
2008:Volume 3, PP. 79-83. 
  842
Table 2. Performance of Simulated, Experimented and Existing Motor 
Design 
parameters 
Simulation Result  Experimental Result  Existing Motor 
main
r  
142.37 
173.84  182.120 
main
X  
177.97 
183.8  310.200 
aux
r  
201.10 
194.64  436.100 
aux
X  
205.22 
209.7  309.700 
c
X  
1498.20 
1450.23  1458.2 
2
r  
65.65 
100.200  100.200 
2
X  
122.43 
250.400  292.00 
m
X  
1408.36 
1500  1250.8 
m m
I      
0.198 -36.03 
0.114 -34.33  0.137 -31.43 
a a
I      
0.221 35.30 
0.274 30.67  0.244 14.80 
 
s
I  
0.341 1.87 
0.339 12.83  0.353 -1.43 
 cos  
0.9995 
0.9750  0.999 
in
P  
75.05 
72.75  77.73 
out
P  
55.83 
50.828  43.854 
s  
0.06 
0.07  0.120 
N  
1410 
1395  1382 
T  
0.378 
0.343  0.297 
  
74.40 
69.90  56.42