ardl
Dependent Variable: LNGDP
Method: ARDL
Date: 11/18/24 Time: 20:32
Sample (adjusted): 2 23
Included observations: 22 after adjustments
Maximum dependent lags: 1 (Automatic selection)
Model selection method: Akaike info criterion (AIC)
Dynamic regressors (1 lag, automatic): LNRI LNI
Fixed regressors: C
Number of models evaluated: 4
Selected Model: ARDL(1, 0, 0)
        Variable        Coefficient   Std. Error      t-Statistic     Prob.*
       LNGDP(-1)         0.899525      0.029014        31.00354       0.0000
         LNRI            0.466571      0.564923        0.825902       0.0197
          LNI           -0.241760      0.477820       -0.505964       0.0190
           C             1.888280      1.074790        1.756883       0.0059
R-squared                0.993087     Mean dependent var             28.04774
Adjusted R-squared       0.991935     S.D. dependent var             0.602413
S.E. of regression       0.054101     Akaike info criterion         -2.832975
Sum squared resid        0.052684     Schwarz criterion             -2.634604
Log likelihood           35.16272     Hannan-Quinn criter.          -2.786245
F-statistic              861.9237     Durbin-Watson stat             2.249605
Prob(F-statistic)        0.000000
*Note: p-values and any subsequent tests do not account for model
     selection.
ARDL Long Run Form and Bounds Test
Dependent Variable: D(LNGDP)
Selected Model: ARDL(1, 0, 0)
Case 2: Restricted Constant and No Trend
Date: 11/18/24 Time: 20:39
Sample: 1 23
Included observations: 22
                      Conditional Error Correction Regression
         Variable             Coefficient      Std. Error      t-Statistic   Prob.
           C                    1.888280       1.074790        1.756883      0.0959
       LNGDP(-1)*              -0.100475       0.029014       -3.463034      0.0028
         LNRI**                 0.466571       0.564923        0.825902      0.0197
          LNI**                -0.241760       0.477820       -0.505964      0.0190
 * p-value incompatible with t-Bounds distribution.
** Variable interpreted as Z = Z(-1) + D(Z).
                                 Levels Equation
                     Case 2: Restricted Constant and No Trend
         Variable             Coefficient      Std. Error      t-Statistic   Prob.
              LNRI              4.643646       6.452619        0.719653      0.0010
               LNI             -2.406167       5.189981       -0.463618      0.0485
                C               18.79350       6.148067        3.056815      0.0068
EC = LNGDP - (4.6436*LNRI -2.4062*LNI + 18.7935)
F-Bounds Test                               Null Hypothesis: No levels relationship
Test Statistic                  Value             Signif.             I(0)      I(1)
                                                            Asymptotic: n=1000
F-statistic                    21.80736           10%              2.63      3.35
k                                 2                 5%              3.1      3.87
                                                  2.5%             3.55      4.38
                                                    1%             4.13         5
Actual Sample Size                22                        Finite Sample: n=35
                                                   10%              2.845    3.623
                                                    5%              3.478    4.335
                                                    1%              4.948    6.028
                                                            Finite Sample: n=30
                                                   10%              2.915    3.695
                                                    5%              3.538    4.428
                                                    1%              5.155    6.265
NORMALITY
8
                                                                             Series: Residuals
7                                                                            Sample 2 23
                                                                             Observations 22
6
5                                                                            Mean            1.35e-15
                                                                             Median         -0.009105
4                                                                            Maximum         0.074150
3                                                                            Minimum        -0.115012
                                                                             Std. Dev.       0.050087
2                                                                            Skewness       -0.327564
                                                                             Kurtosis        2.616855
1
0                                                                            Jarque-Bera    0.527994
        -0.10              -0.05              0.00                  0.05     Probability    0.767976
HETEROSKADICITY
Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey
Null hypothesis: Homoskedasticity
F-statistic             0.644378     Prob. F(3,18)                 0.5965
Obs*R-squared           2.133581     Prob. Chi-Square(3)           0.5451
Scaled explained SS     1.154649     Prob. Chi-Square(3)           0.7639
Test Equation:
Dependent Variable: RESID^2
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/18/24 Time: 20:46
Sample: 2 23
Included observations: 22
      Variable         Coefficient   Std. Error    t-Statistic      Prob.
         C             -0.030169      0.063553     -0.474705       0.6407
     LNGDP(-1)          0.001131      0.001716      0.659276       0.5181
       LNRI            -0.002344      0.033404     -0.070164       0.9448
        LNI             0.002642      0.028254      0.093498       0.9265
R-squared               0.096981     Mean dependent var           0.002395
Adjusted R-squared     -0.053522     S.D. dependent var           0.003117
S.E. of regression      0.003199     Akaike info criterion       -8.488992
Sum squared resid       0.000184     Schwarz criterion           -8.290620
Log likelihood          97.37891     Hannan-Quinn criter.        -8.442261
F-statistic             0.644378     Durbin-Watson stat           2.114025
Prob(F-statistic)       0.596480
LM TEST
Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:
Null hypothesis: No serial correlation at up to 2 lags
F-statistic                0.371111     Prob. F(2,16)                    0.6958
Obs*R-squared              0.975312     Prob. Chi-Square(2)              0.6141
Test Equation:
Dependent Variable: RESID
Method: ARDL
Date: 11/18/24 Time: 20:46
Sample: 2 23
Included observations: 22
Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero.
       Variable           Coefficient    Std. Error      t-Statistic      Prob.
      LNGDP(-1)            0.001625       0.030283        0.053650       0.9579
        LNRI              -0.129158       0.604913       -0.213516       0.8336
         LNI               0.099108       0.508765        0.194802       0.8480
          C                0.098136       1.121464        0.087507       0.9314
      RESID(-1)           -0.178727       0.264987       -0.674473       0.5096
      RESID(-2)           -0.176123       0.268856       -0.655081       0.5217
R-squared                  0.044332     Mean dependent var              1.35E-15
Adjusted R-squared        -0.254314     S.D. dependent var              0.050087
S.E. of regression         0.056096     Akaike info criterion          -2.696502
Sum squared resid          0.050348     Schwarz criterion              -2.398945
Log likelihood             35.66152     Hannan-Quinn criter.           -2.626406
F-statistic                0.148445     Durbin-Watson stat              2.087771
Prob(F-statistic)          0.977603
CUSUM
15
10
 -5
-10
-15
        6           8          10          12            14            16          18   20   22
                                             CUSUM                5% Significance
CUSUM SQAURE
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
       6       8   10      12       14     16     18          20   22
                        CUSUM of Squares    5% Significance