0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views2 pages

Unit 3 Journal

Hhh

Uploaded by

lizzie.right11
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views2 pages

Unit 3 Journal

Hhh

Uploaded by

lizzie.right11
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Elizabeth Otun

EMS3O8-D

2024-04-10

Mrs. Mallocci

“Untruthful content and Misinformation”

Social media consumption of inaccurate material can result in misconceptions, the

dissemination of false information when shared, and the possibility of influencing opinions or

choices based on incorrect information. It may also be a factor in the erosion of confidence in

trustworthy organizations and sources. Furthermore, depending on the situation and the degree of

false information, acting on it can have real-world repercussions. Social media algorithms have

the ability to filter content so that it supports an individual's preexisting beliefs, reinforcing

extreme opinions. This may result in a lack of exposure to various viewpoints. Furthermore,

algorithms frequently promote captivating and addicting material to keep people scrolling, giving

engagement precedence over accuracy. This may promote the dissemination of false and

dangerous information. Giving openness top priority would be one approach to make this better.

Increasing user comprehension of the algorithms; alternatively, policies to prevent the

dissemination of false information and support diverse viewpoints worldwide should be put into

place.

Finally, there are several reasons why filter bubbles may be an issue. It limits our exposure to a

variety of perspectives by, first, reinforcing preexisting biases and assumptions. As a result of

people becoming more ingrained in their lifestyles, societal fragmentation may result. Second,
filter bubbles might provide the impression that everyone in a group agrees, giving the

impression that their point of view is the only valid one. Third, even though users are more likely

to come across and share content that supports their preexisting opinions, filter bubbles can aid in

the propagation of false information. Overall, filter bubbles can have detrimental effects on

democracy, and the ability to make informed decisions based on a thorough understanding of

issues. It's essential for individuals to actively seek out diverse perspectives and for platforms to

design algorithms that prioritize exposure to a variety of standpoints.

You might also like