TASK PERFORMANCE

IN

RPH

4 STANDS

AREGLADO, PRINCESS ELIZABETH M.

BSIT 2.1D

MA’AM REYNALYN PAGKALIWANGAN

LIMASAWA VS. MASAO BUTUAN

The Philippines, an archipelago with a rich history and diverse culture, is home to
numerous locations that have made major contributions to the history of the country. Butuan and
Limawasa are notable among them due to their distinct contributions to the history of the nation.
Encapsulating the impact of colonial powers on Filipino culture, Limawasa is known for its
historical significance as the location of the first Catholic Mass celebrated in the Philippines. On
the other hand, Butuan, which is well-known for its archeological value and pre-colonial
commercial history, offers insight into the highly developed communities that before foreign
contact in the Philippines. From the Philippines' indigenous origins to the effects of colonization,
these two sites collectively demonstrate the country's complex past.

The province of Southern Leyte contains the small island of Limawasa, often called
Limasawa. Most famously, on March 31, 1521, Spanish adventurer Ferdinand Magellan and his
company conducted the first Mass ever celebrated in the Philippines. Christianity was brought to
the archipelago during this time, and it would go on to have a significant influence on Filipino
culture and identity. With its tropical scenery, the little island is a reminder of the time of Spanish
colonization, when colonial rule and religion were linked. In addition to serving as a historical
landmark, Limasawa is now a place to consider the lasting effects of colonialism as well as the
tenacity of regional customs and beliefs. However, Butuan, which is in Agusan del Norte, offers
a fascinating look into the pre-colonial history of the Philippines. Butuan's importance as a
vibrant trading hub is attested by archeological discoveries like as ancient gold artifacts, wooden
boats called balangays, and proof of a sophisticated society involved in commerce with nearby
regions. According to historical accounts, Butuan was a vital hub for trade and culture as early as
the tenth century, enabling contacts with countries in Southeast Asia, including China and India.
As demonstrated by a number of regional celebrations, such as the Araw ng Butuan, which
highlights the city's history and the accomplishments of its citizens, the city is frequently
honored for its rich cultural legacy.

The claim that Limasawa is the site of the first Catholic Mass in the Philippines, celebrated
on March 31, 1521, rests on a foundation of robust historical evidence, geographical accuracy,
cultural pride, and scholarly agreement. Historical accounts, particularly from Ferdinand
Magellan’s expedition, provide direct documentation that links this momentous event to
Limasawa. The geographical positioning of Limasawa further aligns with the descriptions
recorded in Magellan’s chronicles, bolstering its case as the authentic site of the first Mass.
Archaeological findings on the island lend further credence to the claims surrounding the first
Mass and the arrival of Spanish colonizers. These discoveries enrich the historical context and
provide tangible evidence of early interactions between indigenous populations and Spanish
explorers. The convergence of historical accounts, geographical alignment, cultural significance,
archaeological support, and scholarly backing underscores the importance of Limasawa as the
site of the first Catholic Mass in the Philippines. This event not only marks a pivotal moment in
the country’s religious history but also continues to shape the identity and cultural heritage of the
people of Limasawa today.
 CAVITY MUTINY:

FILIPINO VS. SPANISH PERSPECTIVE

The Cavite Mutiny of 1872 is a significant event in Philippine history, marking the
beginning of Filipino resistance against Spanish colonial rule. This brief uprising at the Cavite
naval arsenal involved Filipino soldiers and laborers who were unhappy with their treatment
under Spanish authority. However, the ways in which this event is viewed differ greatly between
Filipinos and the Spanish rulers.

From the Filipino perspective, the Cavite Mutiny was an important act of defiance against
centuries of exploitation. During this period, many Filipinos suffered under harsh laws, heavy
taxation, and compulsory military service. The mutineers were not just reacting to grievances;
they sought to assert their rights and identity as Filipinos in a society that discriminated against
them. This uprising is often seen as a precursor to the broader nationalist movement that would
emerge later, inspiring leaders like José Rizal and Andres Bonifacio to push for Philippine
independence. The legacy of the mutiny continues to influence discussions about nationalism
today. On the other hand, the Spanish authorities viewed the Cavite Mutiny as a serious threat to
their colonial rule. They perceived it as an act of betrayal, influenced by revolutionary ideas that
could undermine their control in the Philippines. The Spanish government reacted strongly,
fearing that similar uprisings could occur. They implemented harsh punitive measures, including
mass executions of suspected insurgents, to reassert their authority and prevent further unrest.

The Cavite Mutiny of 1872, it becomes evident that adopting a Filipino viewpoint is crucial
for a thorough understanding of this significant event in Philippine history. This approach not
only clarifies the motivations and experiences of Filipino participants but also highlights the
broader social, political, and economic environments that influenced their actions. By centering
the voices and narratives of the Filipinos involved, we gain valuable insights into their struggles
against colonial oppression, their aspirations for reform, and their quest for national identity.
 Additionally, adopting a Filipino perspective challenges the prevalent Eurocentric
interpretations of Philippine history that often overlook the contributions and agency of the local
population. It allows us to recognize the resilience and courage of the Filipino people in
confronting systemic injustice, thereby deepening our connection to their historical narrative.
Understanding the Cavite Mutiny from this perspective not only pays tribute to those who fought
for their rights but also serves to inspire modern movements for social justice and self-
determination, embracing the Filipino viewpoint enhances our historical comprehension and
promotes a more nuanced and inclusive interpretation of the past. It encourages us to
acknowledge the complexities inherent in the struggle for freedom and the importance of
recognizing the diverse voices that have shaped the nation’s history. In doing so, we honor the
dignity and sacrifices of our ancestors in their pursuit of a fair and equitable society.
 RIZAL RETRACTION:

PRO-RETRACTION VS. COUNTER RETRACTION

Jose Rizal, the national hero of the Philippines, has remained a figure of inspiration and
controversy, particularly concerning the circumstances surrounding his supposed retraction of his
anti-Catholic sentiments shortly before his execution in 1896. The document, which supposedly
expressed Rizal’s recantation of his earlier works—most notably, his critiques of the Catholic
Church—has sparked intense debate among historians, scholars, and enthusiasts of Philippine
history. The implications of his retraction or lack thereof play a vital role in understanding his
legacy and the broader narrative of the Philippine struggle for independence. This essay will
explore both pro-retraction and counter-retraction arguments to unravel the complexities
surrounding Rizal’s final moments and their impact on Philippine nationalism.

Pro-retraction supporters argue that José Rizal did indeed retract his previous statements
against the Catholic Church. This perspective is primarily supported by the existence of a
document allegedly signed by Rizal on December 29, 1896, a day before his execution, in which
he renounces his past works, especially “Noli Me Tangere” and “El Filibusterismo,” which had
been critical of colonial rule and the Catholic Church's role in it. Rizal's execution—faced with
imminent death, it is posited that he sought peace with the Church and wished to ease his
conscience. His background in a deeply Catholic society may have influenced his decision to
retract. Those in favor of the retraction often reference testimonies from witnesses present during
his final days. They argue that several individuals claimed to have seen Rizal signing the
retraction document, and church officials have consistently maintained that he made this
renouncement. While the counter-retraction camp asserts that Rizal did not retract his earlier
arguments against the Church or abandon his revolutionary ideals. Counter-retraction advocates
highlight Rizal’s unwavering commitment to reform and excellence in his writings up until his
execution. His letters and testimonies express a deep-seated disillusionment with the clergy and
colonial rule, culminating in the belief that Rizal would not abandon his principles in his final
moments. This viewpoint posits that claiming Rizal retracted his earlier positions undermines his
role as a national hero. Instead of a figure seeking reconciliation, Rizal is celebrated as an icon of
resistance against colonial oppression, representing a lineage of defiance that many Filipinos
cherish.

The concept of pro retraction emphasizes the importance of flexibility and adaptability in
decision-making, particularly in dynamic environments that are subject to rapid changes. By
adopting a pro retraction approach, organizations can respond promptly to emerging situations,
ensuring they remain agile and effective. Additionally, pro retraction relies heavily on data-
driven decision-making. By analyzing real-time data, organizations can adapt their strategies
based on the most current information, moving away from outdated assumptions. This informed
approach reduces risks associated with overly ambitious projects, leading to more sustainable
outcomes and long-term success. The focus on immediate priorities also improves overall
effectiveness and productivity. By concentrating efforts on what matters most at any given
moment, organizations can navigate challenges more effectively. Furthermore, the pro retraction
approach encourages innovation, allowing teams to experiment and pivot based on their
learnings rather than being restricted by strict guidelines. In spro retraction promotes flexibility,
efficient resource use, data-driven decisions, minimized risk, heightened focus, innovation, and
improved stakeholder satisfaction, making it a valuable strategy for organizations striving for
success in ever-changing circumstances.
 KATIPUNAN’S CRY:

CRY OF BALINTAWAK VS. CRY OF PUGAD LAWIN

The Cry of Balintawak and the Cry of Pugad Lawin are among the most historic events in
Philippine history. They marked the beginning of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish
colonial rule. These simply meant not just a rise against oppression, but also an awakening of
national consciousness in Filipinos. Led by the Katipunan, this revolutionary society that was
founded by Andrés Bonifacio, these cries for help stood symbolically for the desire of freedom
and identity of Filipinos. This essay delves on the meaning and value of both cries with regards
to their history in the Philippine Revolution and how such cries affected the struggle of the
nation in its fight for liberation. Late 19th century was full of discontent with the colonial rule of
Spain. Filipinos were economically exploited, and their political rights were taken away and
suffered from social injustice. The reformist intellectuals and writers who initially adopted
peaceful ways to effect change set a stage for the revolutionary spirit. However, oppression and
even execution of some of the key reformists, such as José Rizal, ignited a much more militant
path toward freedom.

The Cry of Balintawak occurred on August 26, 1896. It marked the official start of the
Philippine Revolution. Andrés Bonifacio and other Katipuneros gathered in Balintawak, now
Quezon City, and declared rebellion openly. This was also a symbolic declaration showing that
Filipinos and other factions unitedly rejected the colonial powers. As Bonifacio tore his cedula,
residence certificate, it already became an act of defiance to the Spanish authorities. The calls
staged during the Cry of Balintawak inspired many to join the revolutionary cause, sweeping the
archipelago with revolts. Not so long after the Balintawak Cry, the Cry of Pugad Lawin
happened. The date is always in contention, but it falls in a similar timeframe as the Cry of
Balintawak in late August 1896. Again, Bonifacio and his men burned their cedulas, marking
perhaps a more definite break from colonial loyalty. It marked another intense turning point in
revolutionary action, away from incremental reform toward an all-out fight for independence.
Pugad Lawin was a symbol of bravado and willpower, thereby giving impetus to the
revolutionary interpretation and inspiring various individuals to participate in struggle against
Spanish colonization.

There is the Cry of Balintawak, marking one of the most important events which would
symbolize the start of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish colonial rule. The Cry of
Balintawak occurred on the nights of August 1896. Such an event becomes the very crucial or
critical changing point in the fight for the Filipinos toward independence. During this period of
the late 19th century, economic and social inequalities are severely recognized among Filipinos,
and at this time under Spanish colonization, political rights were largely neglected. This was a
symbol and a unifying force that called many Filipinos to rise up in the fight to wrest their
country's freedom and national identity. The Cry of Balintawak will become the heralding alarm
signaling the awakening of Filipino nationalism. It really serves as a catalytic factor for later
revolts into the Philippines' winning independence. Today, it is celebrated and remembered as
one of the defining moments in the Philippines' history, encapsulating courage and the relentless
pursuit of freedom. The Cry lives in the hearts of future generations, truly stirring a valuable
sense of pride and worth and inspiring people to fight for their rights and sovereignty as well,
reinforcing the significance of these events within the ongoing and presently living narrative of
justice and independence in the Philippines and outside of it.