SL Script Merged
SL Script Merged
SLIDE 1-6 giapil na nakog butang ang naa sa ppt so pwede dili na magbasa sa slide diritso na
sa script
SABINA
This chapter will equip us with the knowledge to understand the role of investments in an entity’s
financial growth, the classifications of financial assets and liabilities, and the procedures for
recognizing and measuring these assets.
We’ll also learn about standards like PFRS 9, which guide the accounting treatment of these
investments. By the end, you’ll have a solid foundation to apply these principles in real-world
accounting scenarios.
Investment is the act of allocating money or resources into assets, ventures, or opportunities
to generate returns or achieving growth over time.
This could involve purchasing stocks, bonds, or even making long-term commitments to
equipment or projects.
For an entity, investments are not just expenditures—they represent strategic decisions to
increase financial wealth and stability. Understanding how these investments are recognized,
measured, and classified is essential for accurate financial reporting.
[Insert the thought-provoking question here]
"If you had excess cash right now, how would you invest it to grow your wealth?"
let’s talk about what investment to choose. The choice of what investment outlet an entity
should choose mainly depends on the following three factors:
LYNA
Each classification affects how these financial assets are recognized, measured, and reported in
financial statements.
Slide 8: Classifications of Financial Assets
● The entity’s business model for managing the assets, refers to how the company
plans to use the asset (whether to hold it to collect cash flows or sell it).
● The contractual cash flow characteristics of the asset, which refers to whether the
asset generates cash flows that are solely principal and interest payments
Slide 10
Next, let’s understand how we compute the fair value of financial assets, which is essentially
figuring out what an investment is worth at a given time. There are two main methods we can
use:
First, there is the Quoted Price Approach, which is used when the fair value of an asset can be
directly obtained from publicly available market prices. This method is applicable to both equity
securities, like stocks, and debt securities, like bonds. For equity securities, the fair value is
typically the quoted price per share, meaning the price at which the stock is currently being
traded in the stock market. For debt securities, the fair value is usually expressed as a
percentage of the face amount. For example, if a bond has a face value of $1,000 and is quoted
at 98%, its fair value would be $980.
The second method is the Present Value Approach, which is primarily used for debt securities,
especially when there is no quoted market price available. In this approach, the fair value is
calculated by determining the present value of the future cash flows from the investment. These
cash flows include the principal amount, or the original amount invested, and the interest
payments expected over time. To find the present value, these future cash flows are discounted
using the market interest rate on the measurement date. For instance, if an investor is expecting
to receive $1,000 two years from now, that amount is adjusted to reflect its value in today’s
terms because money in the future is worth less than money today due to the time value of
money.
ROLITH
Slide 11
Now, let’s look at what happens when the transaction price is not equal to the fair value
If the transaction price is less than the fair value, the difference is an unrealized gain
because the asset was purchased below its market value. For example, if you buy an asset for
$90 and its fair value is $100, the $10 difference is recorded as an unrealized gain.
If the transaction price is greater than the fair value, the difference is an unrealized loss
because the asset was purchased above its market value. For instance, if you buy an asset for
$110 and its fair value is $100, the $10 difference is recorded as an unrealized loss.
Slide 12
"Next, let's explore the Basket Purchase of Financial Assets, where we'll compare the
Traditional and Contemporary Approaches to see how different methods handle the
purchase and valuation of multiple assets at once."
Traditional Approach:
● In the Traditional Approach, when you buy several financial assets together, the total
transaction price is divided based on the relative fair values of each asset.
● For example, if one asset is worth more than the others, it will get a larger share of the
total price.
● The key point here is that no gain or loss is recorded at the beginning. This means that
even if the market value of the assets changes right after the purchase, no immediate
adjustments are made.
● This method is considered outdated and is no longer commonly used in modern
accounting practices.
Contemporary Approach:
● In contrast, the Contemporary Approach does not divide the transaction price among
the assets. Instead, each asset is measured based on its fair value right from the start.
● If there’s a difference between what you paid and the total fair value of the assets, that
difference is recognized immediately as an unrealized gain or loss.
● This means that the changes in the asset values are reflected in the books right away,
similar to how other assets are handled in modern accounting.
Now that we’ve covered the key concepts, it's time to apply what we've learned. Let’s move on
to some practice problems to test your understanding and see how these ideas work in real-life
scenarios.
Estimated Duration: 30-35 minutes
Section 2. - LOSS OF THE THING DUE
Yna Introduction
Learning Objectives
Articles to cover
Articles to be discussed: 1262 - 1263
YNA
[Slide 1: introduction]
Good day, everyone! We’re so excited to be here with all of you today. I’m Sabinarose, and
together with my groupmates, Lyna, Charish, and Rolith. We'll be discussing one of the key
topics in Obligations and Contracts—“Loss of the Thing Due.”
This principle is essential for understanding what happens when the object of an obligation can
no longer be fulfilled.
Let’s begin by outlining our goals for today. By the end of this discussion, you’ll be able to
achieve these learning objectives. May we call on [Kassandra] to read the objectives for us.
1. The thing is specific or determinate: The obligation is tied to a uniquely identified
item.
2. The loss happens without the debtor's fault: The debtor did not cause or contribute to
the loss.
3. The debtor is not in delay: The loss occurred before the debtor failed to perform on
time.
so guys, remember these requisites for the extinguishment of obligation when loss of a thing.
However, there are exceptions to this general rule that we have to consider.
1. The loss is due to the debtor's fault: If the debtor caused the loss, they are still
responsible because it’s their wrongdoing. Example: The debtor damages the item
through negligence.
If the debtor took too long to deliver and the item was lost during the delay, they are
liable because the delay caused risk to shift to them.
3. Liable for fortuitous events (Art. 1174): The debtor remains responsible for loss due
to unavoidable events when:
- it is expressly provided by law, or
- by stipulation of the parties, or
- when the nature of the obligation requires the assumption of risk.
○ Required by law: Some laws impose liability regardless of the event.
Example: If an obligation arises from a criminal offense, the law expressly states
that the debtor remains liable even if the thing is lost due to a fortuitous event.
○ Stipulated by the parties: The contract explicitly states that the debtor must
bear the risk.
○ Risk is part of the obligation: The obligation involves assuming specific risks,
like transporting goods.
4. Promised the same thing to multiple people: If the debtor promised one item to
several creditors, and it’s lost, the debtor is still liable.
Example: The debtor sold a rare painting to two buyers at the same time.
5. The lost item is generic or indeterminate (Art. 1263): Generic things are not
extinguished because they can be replaced by something of the same kind.
will have an example for this in later discussion..
6. The obligation comes from a criminal offense (Art. 1268): If the obligation arises
from a crime (e.g., theft), the debtor remains liable even if the stolen item is lost.
Example: A thief must pay for a stolen car, even if it’s later destroyed in an accident.
ROLITH BRILLO
articles 1264-1265
Rolith:
Article 1164 means that if only part of something owed is lost or damaged, the courts will
decide if that loss is serious enough to cancel the obligation. The decision depends on how
important the lost or damaged part is to fulfilling the promise. If the loss makes it impossible to
achieve the purpose of the obligation, it may be canceled.
Question!
[May I call on Grace to answer this question.]
Question:
In the example, Why does the obligation end if the horse’s injury is permanent, but not if
the horse is to be slaughtered?
Answer:
The obligation ends in the first case because the horse’s permanent injury prevents it from
being used as a racehorse, which is likely the purpose of the obligation. This makes the partial
loss significant enough to cancel the obligation.
However, if the horse is meant to be slaughtered, the injury doesn’t affect its purpose. John can
still fulfill his obligation by delivering the horse, though he may need to pay for any
inconvenience or damages caused to Sam.
This shows that the effect of loss or damage depends on how it impacts the intended use of the
thing promised in the obligation.
[ Slide 20 ]
○ Lack of fault by the debtor: If the debtor can prove that they were not at fault,
it is their responsibility to provide evidence.
○ Natural calamity: If the loss is due to a natural disaster, and there’s no delay or
promise to another creditor, the debtor is not at fault.
[Slide 21]
Example:
(1) Ben borrowed Sam's car. On the due date of the obligation,
[Slide 22]
Ben told Sam that the car was stolen and that he was not at fault. That is not enough to
extinguish Ben’s obligation. It is presumed that the loss was due to his fault. Hence, he is liable
unless he proves the contrary.
[Slide 23]
(2) Suppose the house of Ben was destroyed because of the earthquake. It is admitted that there
was an earthquake and it was accidental and that the car was in the house at the time it
occurred. Here, Ben is not liable unless Sam proves fault on the part of Ben.
Lyna Villanueva
[Slide 24: Article 1266]
[For article 1266, may we call on Des Murallon to read article 1263?]
Then, may we call on Mae Ann Guarin to share to us your insights about the article, share at
least 1 insight about this article.]
thank you!
[Slide 25: Effects of impossibility]
This article refers to a case when, without the debtor's fault, the obligation becomes legally or
physically impossible. The impossibility of performance will result in the extinction of the
obligation.
This impossibility must take place after the constitution of the obligation. If the obligation is
impossible from the very beginning, the obligation is void (see Arts. 1183, 1348.) and it is
immaterial whether the impossibility was known or unknown to the parties. In such a case,
there is no obligation to be extinguished, and the parties would be entirely discharged.
Okay, so now we know the kinds of impossibility and their meaning. Let’s go to the example to
better understand this article.
[Slide 27: Article 1266]
EXAMPLES:
(1) John obliged himself to paint a picture for Sam to be finished within a month. One week
after the obligation was constituted,
Here, the obligation of Sam has become physically impossible. Sam is, therefore, released from
his obligation.
The rule does not apply where Sam bound himself absolutely to finish the painting irrespective
of whether his failure is caused by unavoidable accident or for any reason in which case he
shall be liable to pay damages for nonperformance.
The obligation of John is, therefore, extinguished because it has become legally impossible.
Here, the performance of the prestation is directly prohibited by law.
In this case, Jacob may be released, in whole or in part, from his obligation to continue with the
construction.
Charish Dalion
Article 1268 is another instance where a fortuitous event does not exempt the debtor from
liability. (Arts. 1174, 1262.)
The obligation subsists except when the creditor refused to accept the thing (eg, property stolen
from him) without justification, after it had been offered to him. Consignation is not necessary.
The debtor, however, must still exercise due diligence.
D stole the jeep of C. Here, D has the obligation to return the jeep to C. The obligation of D
aríses from an act punishable by law. (Art. 1157.)
Even if the jeep is destroyed without the fault of D, he shall be liable for the payment of its
price. The exception to the rule is when C is in mora accipiendi (creditor’s delay). (see Art
1169) In either case, D is liable if the loss is due to his fault.
Under the article, the creditor is given the right to proceed against the third person responsible
for the loss. There is no need for an assignment by the debtor. The rights of action of the debtor
are transferred to the creditor from the moment the obligation is extinguished, by operation of
law to protect the interest of the latter by reason of the loss.
The obligation of John is extinguished and he is not liable to Bryan. Such being the case, John
would not be interested in going after T. The law, however, protects Bryan by giving him the
right to bring an action against Sam to recover the price of the horse with damages.
[Slide 41: Outro]
thank you everyone chuchu ikaw nay bahala dai
True or False: If a debtor proves that a loss occurred due to a natural calamity, they are
automatically not at fault for the loss of the thing, whether he is in delay or not.
Explanation: False. A natural calamity may excuse liability, but it does not
automatically absolve the debtor, especially if they are in delay. Liability depends on the
situation and whether the loss could have been prevented.
Strategic Cost Management
Slide 1-4: Yna
Slide 5-8: Lyna
Slide 9-11: Rolith
Slide 12-13: Charish
SABINA
Slide 1:
Finally, we are down to our last subject. At this point, we’ll discuss the Contemporary
Business Environment and Strategic Focus of Cost Management.
Slide 2:
At the end of the activity, you should be able to…
1. Describe the more recent changes in contemporary business
environment such as
a. The Global Business Environment
b. Advances in Manufacturing Techniques
c. Advances in Information
d. A greater focus on customers
e. New forms of organization
f. Changes in the Social, Political & Cultural Environment
2. Explain the strategic focus of cost management.
3. Describe the relationship between cost management and the
accounting systems.
4. Explain the concept of integrative framework on how the accounting
system is used in the firm's organizational architecture.
Let’s start with a question to spark your curiosity: “How do businesses stay
competitive amidst rapid technological and social changes?”
Let’s explore each of these changes starting from the global business environment
LYNA
Slide 5: Next is Advances in Manufacturing Technologies
1. Just-in-Time (JIT) Inventory Method: This method helps reduce costs and
waste by minimizing the need to keep large amounts of raw materials and
unfinished products in stock.
2. Speed-to-Market: Companies gain a competitive advantage by delivering
products or services faster than their competitors, allowing them to meet
customer demands quickly.
Slide 8: Business practices have evolved significantly over time. Here are key
comparisons between prior and contemporary business environments:
Management Organization
ROLITH
Slide 9: Manufacturing
Marketing
● Products: Earlier businesses offered fewer variations with long product life
cycles. Now, there is a greater variety of products with shorter life cycles.
● Markets: Marketing has expanded from primarily domestic markets to global
reach.
Slide 10: Changes in the Social, Political, and Cultural Environment of Business
The business environment has evolved due to significant social, political, and cultural
shifts. These changes include a more diverse workforce in terms of ethnicity and
culture, heightened ethical responsibility among managers and employees, and
increased deregulation by national governments, encouraging freer market
dynamics.
Cost management has evolved through four key stages, reflecting its growing
importance in business strategy:
In this phase, the focus shifted to creating reliable external financial reports.
However, the usefulness of these systems for internal cost management was limited.
Systems began tracking key operational data and generating more accurate, relevant
cost information to support decision-making.
CHARISH
Slide 12: Cost Management and Accounting Systems
Cost management involves planning and controlling decisions to increase customer
value and reduce costs, focusing on materials, processes, and product designs.
While accounting systems provide essential data, cost management extends beyond
accounting by aligning cost strategies with business goals like quality, customer
satisfaction, and revenue growth. It includes strategic investments, such as
advertising or product improvements, to boost profits and integrate with broader
management strategies. This alignment ensures programs for quality, innovation, and
customer satisfaction to support long-term success.
Slide 13: This figure presents an Integrative Framework that highlights the role of the
accounting system within a firm’s organizational architecture. At the top, two key
external factors—technological innovation and market conditions—influence the
firm’s business strategy, which considers elements such as asset structure, customer
base, and the nature of knowledge.
The business strategy interacts with the firm’s organizational architecture, which
includes elements like decision-making rights, centralization or decentralization,
performance evaluation systems, and accounting systems. These components work
together to create incentives and actions for managers and employees, ultimately
driving firm value.