0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views4 pages

Reopen Application B

Uploaded by

susmitatbvnlaw
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views4 pages

Reopen Application B

Uploaded by

susmitatbvnlaw
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE AT BENGALURU

O.S NO. 3111/2023

BETWEEN:

M/s. J.P.M Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd. ...PLAINTIFF

AND:

Dr. T.N. Venkatesh


Since deceased by his L.R’s ...DEFENDANTS

APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL


PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, ON BEHALF OF THE SECOND DEFENDANT

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the Second Defendant herein prays

that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to reopen the stage of placing this Defendant ex parte

and permit this Defendant to come on record, in the interest of justice and equity.

Bengaluru

Dated: Advocate for Second Defendant

1
IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE AT BENGALURU

O.S NO. 3111/2023

BETWEEN:

M/s. J.P.M Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd. ...PLAINTIFF

AND:

Dr. T.N. Venkatesh


Since deceased by his L.R’s ...DEFENDANTS

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ashwin Tirumale Venkatesh, aged about 48 years, son of Late Sri. Venkatesh, residing at No.

802, Transill Circle, Santa Clara 95054 CA USA, do hereby solemnly affirm on oath and state as

follows:

1. I am the Second Defendant herein, and am aware of the facts of the case and am

competent to swear to the contents of this affidavit.

2. I state that the Plaintiff has filed the subject suit, inter alia seeking a judgement and

decree for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 08.03.2019 directing the

Defendants to execute and register the sale deed upon receipt of the balance sale

consideration.

3. I state that my father Late Sri. Venkatesh had purchased the suit schedule property in the

year 1988 and he passed away on 04.10.2019. My mother the First Defendant herein,

myself and my sister the Third Defendant herein, are the only legal heirs of our father,

late Sri. T.N. Venkatesh.

4. I state that myself and my sister have executed a Release Deed dated 26.04.2022 in the

First Defendant, our mother’s favour and have released our 1/3 rd right, title and interest

over the Suit Schedule Property in our mother’s favour. This execution of the release

deed is also evident from the perusal of the Plaint and Document No. 7 produced by the

Plaintiff.

5. I state that the subject matter was last listed on 13.09.2023 where in this Hon’ble Court

was pleased to hold the summons served on me as sufficient and placed me ‘ex parte’.

Admittedly I do not have any right, title or interest in the schedule property and hence

am not a necessary or proper party to the present suit. The Plaintiff making me a party to

2
the suit has no nexus with the relief claimed in the plaint, and I am neither a necessary

nor a proper party to the suit.

6. I state that I permanently reside in USA at No. 802, Transill Circle, Santa Clara 95054

CA USA. I do not reside in the address where the summons was served on me.

7. I state that I have not executed any General Power of Attorney in favour of Sri. T.C.

Ananthamurthy to represent me in any Court matters.

8. However, the Plaintiff herein with a false intention to mislead this Hon’ble Court has

taken steps to serve summons in the address of Sri. T.C. Ananthamurthy as my General

Power of Attorney holder. I state that I do not reside in the said address. Hence, the

summons purportedly sent to the address of Sri T. C. Ananthamurthy cannot be held as

sufficient service on me. I became aware of the summons being sent to the wrong

address through the first Defendant, on the last date of hearing.

9. I state that my absence or my Counsel’s absence on 13.09.2023 was inadvertent and is by

no means to protract the judicial proceedings.

10. I state that my absence, on 13.09.2023, before this Hon’ble Court, is unintentional, bona

fide and for the reasons stated above. Hence, the accompanying application.

11. Great loss and hardship will be caused to me if the accompanying application is not

allowed. Per contra, no loss or injury will be caused to Plaintiff, if the same is allowed.

WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the

accompanying application, in the interests of justice and equity.

Identified by me:

Advocate DEPONENT

Santa Clara

Dated:

No. of corrections:

3
VERIFICATION

I, Ashwin Tirumale Venkatesh, the Second Defendant herein, do hereby state that what is stated

above in para 1 to 11 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Santa Clara

DEPONENT
Date:

You might also like