ALVES Et Al., 2014
ALVES Et Al., 2014
Abstract
Background: Humans in various cultures have feared snakes, provoking an aversion and persecution that hinders
conservation efforts for these reptiles. Such fact suggests that conservation strategies for snakes should consider the
interactions and perceptions of the local population towards these animals. The aim of this study was to investigate
students' perception of snakes and if attitudes and knowledge may differ according to gender and local residence
(urban or rural).
Methods: Data was collected in the second half of 2012 and consisted of questionnaires applied to 108
students in the Basic Education School in the municipality of Sumé, located in the semiarid region of
Northeastern Brazil.
Results: The male respondents recognized more species than female did. Part of the students affirmed to have a fear
of snakes, especially women. Nearly half of respondents (49%) showed negative behaviour towards these animals,
reflecting the influence of potential risk and myths associated with snakes, and supported by a limited knowledge
about these animals and their ecological and utilitarian role. We find that the rural students recognized significantly
more species than the urban students.
Conclusions: Our results point to the need for educational interventions in order to increase knowledge about the
positive aspects associated with snakes, seeking to minimize the influence of myths and beliefs that contribute to a
strong aversion to snakes by the locals. Conservation strategies should therefore engage students but also teachers,
who are key individuals in the process.
Keywords: Ethnoherpetology, Ethnozoology, Conservation, Snakes
© 2014 Alves et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated.
Alves et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:30 Page 2 of 8
http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/30
Data analysis criterion used to recognize these animals, which are lo-
We used descriptive statistics for non-parametric data cally named cobra, even not belonging to the Ophidia
analysis. In order to verify the influence of gender and suborder, a group that includes serpents in general. All
the location of respondents (urban or rural) in the num- snake species listed on the board (n = 27) were recognized
ber of recognized species, we used the Mann–Whitney by students; some of them were recognized by a larger
U test [28]. To verify the influence of the interviewees’ age number of students, especially Micrurus ibiboboca (rec-
in relation to the number of recognized species, we used ognized by 96 students, 88.9%), Boa constrictor (n = 75;
Kendall π correlation [29]; to assess whether the students’ 71.3%), Crotalus durissus (n = 65; 60.2%), Philodryas
education levels (7th, 8th and 9th grades of Primary school) olferssii (n = 62; 57.4%) and Oxyrhopus trigeminus (n = 54;
influenced species recognition we used the Kruskal-Wallis 50%). Even the exotic species were recognized by a signifi-
H test [30]. The Mann–Whitney U test was also used to cant number of students: Naja siamensis (n = 50; 46.3%),
verify whether the respondents’ gender influences the per- Python molurus (n = 35; 32.4%) and Elaphe guttata (n = 13;
ception of fear of snakes. For all tests, we used a signifi- 12.0%). The recognition of the presented species is not sur-
cance level of 5% (p <0.05). Data were analyzed with SPSS© prising, since most species are native to the study region,
software version 20 [31]. allowing the possibility of contact or visualization of these
snakes during everyday activities by the students themselves
Results and discussion or by other people. Concerning exotic species, recognition
The name “snakes” was the term used by all students may be related to the influence of the media (TV, internet),
interviewed to appoint all animals present on the board, making it possible that these species can be viewed by stu-
including serpents (native or exotic) and amphisbae- dents in movies, documentaries and internet sites, even
nians, revealing that serpentiform morphology is the main though they do not occur in Brazil. This shows that the
Alves et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:30 Page 4 of 8
http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/30
“local” knowledge or “traditional” knowledge may have a re- Moreover, when we consider the age group and number
lationship to exogenous information, and even with scien- of recognized snake species, we can see a slightly positive
tific knowledge [32]. correlation (Kendall τ = 0.17, p <0.05), showing that age of
It is clearly noticed that the recognition of snake spe- the respondents did not strongly influence animal recogni-
cies is influenced by factors such as the size, color- tion. These results differ from previous studies that showed
pattern and poisonous potential, since the three snakes that age influences the perception of animals [33,39,40]. It
species known to a larger number of students were: M. should be emphasized, however, that in the present study,
ibiboboca (venomous snake with characteristic color- the results may be related to the slight variation in the re-
pattern), B. constrictor (the largest snake species that oc- spondents’ age in our sample (11–19 years, with average of
curs in Northeast semiarid region) and C. durissus (one 13.6), which makes it difficult to discuss this parameter ac-
of the most venomous snakes that occurs in the region). curately. The same situation was verified when considering
Even when the students recognize the species pictured the level of education, which did not affect the recognition
on the boards, discrepancies were found between the of the number of snake species (Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 0.46;
vernacular names given. For instance, eight respondents p > 0.05).
called the species B. constrictor rattlesnake “cascavel,” al- Most students (72.3%) distinguish between venomous
though this is a common name given to C. durissus. In a and non-venomous species, an acknowledgment that may
way, that divergence between vernacular names is not reflect information obtained from school. This situation
unexpected since the folk denominations of snakes may differs from what has been recorded in ethnozoological re-
vary between different locations [16]. searches in many localities of Northeast semiarid [16] and
In general, female respondents recognize fewer species Brazil [19,41,42], where there is a widespread perception
than male respondents (average of 5.7 and 8.3 species, that most snakes species are considered poisonous, regard-
respectively) (Table 1). Such difference is statistically less of whether or not they have this characteristic. This is
significant (Mann–Whitney U test = 893, n (women) = the same perception of a considerable part of interviewed
56, n (men) = 52, p <0.05)), and confirms previous stud- students (n = 31, 28.7%), who affirmed not distinguish be-
ies which showed that the perception of animal varies tween venomous and non-venomous species. Among the
with gender [33-35]. Farias and Alves [36], for instance, 21 snake species that occur in the surveyed area and were
describe a case in which girls knew less about birds than presented to the students, only three are poisonous and
boys do, and both group studied at a public school in most dangerous: rattlesnake “cascavel” (Crotalus durissus),
the Metropolitan Region of Recife, Northeast Brazil. Caatinga Lancehead “jararaca” (Bothropoides erythromelas)
Kellert and Berry [33] point out that gender influences and real coral snake (Micrurus ibiboboca). Although most
almost all dimensions of attitudes and knowledge about of the students recognize that most species are not poison-
animals, and suggest that men and women have different ous, they are considered aggressive and dangerous, a fact
emotional and cognitive orientations toward animals. that presents a serious conservation problem as it stimu-
Lindemann‐Matthies [37] showed that males generally lates the indiscriminate serpents kill, regardless of whether
like wild and exotic animals whilst females rather prefer or not they are poisonous. It should be highlighted that
pets. Kellert and Berry [33] found that women were only a marginal number of local species are being pointed
more humane about animals than men, but they were also out as responsible for human deaths in Northeastern
more negative in attitudes toward some animals than Brazil [43], in the surveyed area, as well as in other areas
were men. Similar sex differences were also documented of Northeast semiarid [16] and Brazil [19,41,42].
relating to humans’ fears of large carnivores; with fe- The aversion to snakes also extends to the amphis-
males expressing a greater fear to phobic animals than baenians, which are popularly known as serpents due
males [38]. to their serpentiform morphology. Respondents recog-
In the surveyed area, the highest perception of snakes nize and classify these animals as snakes, naming them
by boys may be related to the fact that the majority of mostly as “two headed snakes.” This kind of perception
respondents live in rural areas, where in general, the contributes to the development of a negative behaviour
dominant role of men is with pastoral activities and sub- regarding these animals. A similar situation was re-
sistence agriculture, where it is common to encounter ported by Pinto et al. [44], who completed ethnozoolo-
snakes, while women take care of household chores, where gical research in the Minas Gerais State and found
the possibility of encountering these animals is minimal. In that, besides snakes, amphisbaenians and lizards of the
fact, comparing the total snakes recognized by students of genus Ophiodes and Heterodactylus are also arbitrarily
urban and rural areas, we find that the rural students recog- killed by locals due to classify them as serpents. This
nized significantly more species than the urban students shows a strong connection between knowledge and be-
(Mann–Whitney U test = 797, n (rural) = 80, n (urban) = 28, haviour, an important aspect in ethnoecological studies
p = 0.02). in general [45].
Alves et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:30 Page 5 of 8
http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/30
Most respondents (n = 66; 61.1%) affirmed that they were negative perception in relation to these animals is common
fearful of snakes. Such aversion is more frequent among in the Northeast [16].
women (n = 49; 74%), while 32.7% (n = 17) of men also Snakes have been feared by humans of many cultures,
have this perception (Mann–Whitney U = 684, n (men) = 52, particularly due the fact that many snakes are deadly
n (women) = 56, p <0.05; ΣRwomen = 3824, ΣRmen = 2062), venomous [50]. In the surveyed area, the lethal potential
showing a trend reported in other studies which pointed of the serpents certainly contributes to the spread of the
out that gender differentiates knowledge of and attitudes fear of these animals [16]. However, most species occur-
toward animals [7,33,46]. Similar to our results, Prokop ring in the semiarid region are not poisonous, meaning
et al. [47], in research on students’ attitudes regarding that many snake accidents may not result in the victims’
snakes, verified that fear of snakes is higher in women than death. This reality, though, is ignored by much of the
in men. Likewise, this situation was also reported in rela- population who cannot distinguish between venomous
tion to other animals such as spiders [48] and bats [48,49]. and non-venomous species, and thus, consider all these
It is noteworthy that regardless of gender, there is a great animals as dangerous and harmful [16]. This same ap-
aversion to snakes, which is not surprising as the people’s proach was observed among part of the interviewed
Alves et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:30 Page 6 of 8
http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/30
students who demonstrate uncertainty on the differenti- Table 2 Examples of ecological importance utility value
ation between species that are venomous and those that of snakes according to respondents
are not, although the majority of respondents (n = 77) Importance No. of citations
agreed that not all snakes are poisonous. Important for nature 8
Importantly, the fear of snakes is not only related with It is part of the food chain, controlling the 5
real risks that some species represent, but also to the populations of other animals
legends, beliefs, fables, myths and other cultural aspects Prevent the growth of pests such as rats 2
linked to these animals [1,16,19,51,52]. Among the most Eat other snakes and other poisonous animals 13
relevant cultural features, religious beliefs and practices
Utility value of snakes
have long influenced the interaction between serpents
and people [53,54], and in the Northeast semiarid region it “The poison serves to make medicine” 13
is no different [16,52]. In this region, Catholicism is among Used as food 2
the most widespread religions, and as well as other expres- “The rattle can be used for some stuff” 2
sions of Christian faith, it has influenced the attitudes to- Used in folk medicine 3
wards the local wildlife [55,56]. In this scenario, biblical As pet 1
passages such as in the book of Genesis, in which a serpent
Total 21
deceives Eve, the first woman created by God, so that she
eats the fruit of the forbidden tree in order to have the dis-
cernment of good and evil, can contribute to the bad repu- the poison works as a “medicine.” The first statement,
tation of snakes and is one of the reasons there is such an despite being identified as a positive aspect, reveals the
aversion to these animals in the region [52]. These negative antipathy that local people have on all kind of snakes.
perceptions of snakes are widespread in largely ophiopho- The second statement, which imparts medicinal value
bic Judeo-Christian societies, which condemn snakes for to snakes, is supported by the medical literature that
their perceived treachery against humans as represented by recognizes that reptiles have been used as sources of drugs
Adam and Eve in biblical times [57-59]. In addition, there for modern medical practices [60,61]. Reptiles’ venoms are
are several other myths and tales not related to religion complex mixtures of bioactive molecules [62]. Moreover,
that contribute to the persecution of snakes in the Brazilian the venom of snakes belonging to the families Viperidae
semiarid region [16,52]. It is important to stress, how- and Elapidae contain analgesic substances that are stron-
ever, that not every animal culturally associated with ger than morphine and have been used to treat terminal
evil is hunted indiscriminately, as pointed by Marques cancer patients [63].
[55] and Farias et al. [56].
Assuming eventual encounters with snakes, almost half Final considerations and implications for conservation
of the students (n = 53, 49%) responded in such a way that The present study provides evidence that snakes are per-
indicates that they would kill the animal; 22 of affirmed ceived by many of the students as being harmful and
they would do it by themselves and 31 stated they would dangerous, and most students face a major aversion to
call someone to accomplish this task. Among others re- snakes. These perceptions encourage negative attitudes,
spondents, 48 would choose to let the snake live and 5 especially related to the attempt to kill whenever a snake
would make the snake go back to the bushes. It is notice- is found. These negative attitudes reflect the influences of
able that the part of respondents have negative attitudes a potential threat and some myths associated with snakes.
towards these animals, which reflects common practices in It is also due to limited knowledge about these animals
the Northeast semiarid region where snakes are frequently and their ecological and utilitarian role. Similar situations
killed during daily activities of local people, regardless of occurs not only in Brazil but is spread in different loca-
species [16]. Two respondents did not answer this ques- tions worldwide, making snakes among the most disliked
tion. It is interesting that there was a development of nega- animals; they trigger very strong levels of fear and destruc-
tive attitudes (as is common in the Brazilian semiarid tive behaviours [47,64-67].
region), but also positive, which may be a result of the On the other hand, a significant portion of students
close contact with scientific information disseminated in admitted positive aspects about snakes, highlighting their
books, television programs and internet sites [32]. ecological and economical role. This positive perception is
Positive aspects related to snakes were mentioned by important from a conservationist perspective and should
32 students, of which attributed some importance or be encouraged, seeking to minimize the influence of myths
utility of any value to these animals (Table 2). Thirteen and beliefs that contribute to a strong hatred for these
students cited at least two main aspects of importance animals. Conservation strategies should therefore en-
of these animals: a) some species are important once they gage students but also teachers, who are key individuals
feed on other snakes and other poisonous animals, and b) in the process.
Alves et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:30 Page 7 of 8
http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/30
25. El-Hani CN, Bandeira FPSF: Valuing indigenous knowledge: to call it 50. Molander M, Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Jäger AK, Rønsted N: Cross-cultural
“science” will not help. Cult Stud Sci Educ 2008, 3:751–779. comparison of medicinal floras used against snakebites.
26. Santos LL, Ramos MA, Silva VA, Albuquerque UP: The use of visual stimuli J Ethnopharmacol 2012.
in the recognition of plants from anthropogenic zones: evaluation of the 51. Santos-Fita D, Costa-Neto EM, Schiavetti A: Offensive’ snakes: cultural
checklist-interview method. Sitientibus série Ciências Biológicas 2012, beliefs and practices related to snakebites in a Brazilian rural settlement.
11(2):231–237. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2010, 6(1):1–13.
27. Vieira WLS: Riqueza de Espécies e Utilização de Recursos em uma Taxocenose 52. Fernandes-Ferreira H, Cruz RL, Borges-Nojosa DM, Alves RRN: Crenças
de Squamata em Caatinga Arbórea na Região do Cariri, Paraíba, Brasil, Tese Associadas a Serpentes no Estado do Ceará, Nordeste do Brasil. Sitientibus
de Doutorado. João Pessoa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; 2011. 2012, 11(2):153–163.
28. Mann HB, Whitney DR: On a test of whether one of two random variables 53. Burghardt GM, Murphy JB, Chiszar D, Hutchins M: Combating Ophiophobia:
is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 1947, 18(1):50–60. Origins, Treatment, Education and Conservation Tools. In Snakes: Ecology
29. Kendall M: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 1938, 30:81–93. and Conservation. Edited by Mullin S, Seigel RA, Collins JT. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
30. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. University Press; 2009:262–280.
J Am Stat Assoc 1952, 47(260):583–621. 54. Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Léo Neto NA, Voeks R: Animals for the Gods: magical
31. IBM: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, USA: IBM Corp; 2011. and religious faunal use and trade in Brazil. Hum Ecol 2012, 40(5):751–780.
32. Frazão-Moreira A, Carvalho AM, Martins ME: Local ecological knowledge 55. Marques JGW: É Pecado Matar a Esperança, mas Todo Mundo Quer
also ’comes from books’: cultural change, landscape transformation and Matar o Sariguê’. In Atualidades em Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia. Edited by
conservation of biodiversity in two protected areas in Portugal. Alves AGC, Lucena RFP, Albuquerque UP. Recife: Nuppea/SBEE; 2005:129–143.
Anthropol Notebooks 2009, 15(1):27–36. 56. Farias GB, Alves AGC, Marques JGW: Mythological relations between the
33. Kellert SR, Berry JK: Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife “Lavandeira” birds Fluvicola nengeta and Motacilla alba in Northeast
as affected by gender. Wildl Soc Bull 1987, 15(3):363–371. Brazil and Northwest Spain: possible cultural implications for
34. Melson GF, Fogel A: Children’s Ideas about animal young and their care: conservation. J Ethnobiol 2010, 30(2):240–251.
a reassessment of gender differences in the development of nurturance. 57. Carr AF: The Reptiles. New York: Time Incorporated; 1963.
Anthrozoos Multidisciplinary J Interact People Anim 1989, 2(4):265–273. 58. McCarthy C: Reptile. London: Eyewitness BookslDorling Kindersley; 1991.
35. Ollila L, Bullen C, Collis B: Gender-related preferences for the choice of 59. Attuquayefio DK: The snakes of Ghana: myth, science and reality.
particular animals as writing topics in grade 1. J Res Dev Educ 1989, Ghana J Sci 2004, 44:73–86.
22(2):37–41. 60. Alves RRN, Vieira WLS, Santana GG, Vieira KS, Montenegro PFGP:
36. Farias GB, Alves AGC: Conhecimento Prévio Sobre a Avifauna por Alunos Herpetofauna Used in Traditional Folk Medicine: Conservation
do Ensino Fundamental Numa Escola Pública na Região Metropolitana Implications. In Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine: Implications for
do Recife: em Busca de uma Prática Pedagógica Culturalmente Conservation. 1st edition. Edited by Alves RRN, Rosa IL. Berlin Heidelberg:
Apropriada. In Povos e Paisagens: Etnobiologia, Etnoecologia e Biodiversidade Springer-Verlag; 2013:109–133.
no Brasil. Edited by Albuquerque UP, Alves AGC, Araújo TAS. Recife: 61. Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP: Animals as a Source of Drugs: Bioprospecting
NUPPEA/UFRPE; 2007:48–59. and Biodiversity Conservation. In Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine:
37. Lindemann‐Matthies P: ‘Loveable’mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: how Implications for Conservation. 1st edition. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Springer
children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through Heidelberg; 2013:67–89.
observation of nature. Int J Sci Educ 2005, 27(6):655–677. 62. Chen T, Kwok HF, Ivanyi C, Shaw C: Isolation and cloning of exendin
precursor cDNAs from single samples of venom from the Mexican
38. Røskaft E, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP, Linnell JDC, Andersen R: Patterns of
beaded lizard (Heloderma horridum) and the Gila monster (Heloderma
self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public.
suspectum). Toxicon 2006, 47(3):288–295.
Evolution and human behavior 2003, 24(3):184–198.
63. Bisset NG: One man’s poison, another man’s medicine? J Ethnopharmacol
39. Driscoll JW: Attitudes toward animals: species ratings. Soc Anim 1995,
1991, 32(1–3):71–81.
3(2):139–150.
64. Morris R, Morris D: Men and Snakes. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1965.
40. Furnham A, Pinder A: Young people’s attitudes to experimentation on
65. Shalev A, Ben-Mordehai D: Snakes: interactions with children with
animals. Psychol 1990, 10:444–448.
disabilities and the elderly some psychological considerations. Anthrozoos
41. Alves RRN, Pereira-Filho GA, Vieira KS, Santana GG, Vieira WLS, Almeida WO:
Multidisciplinary J Interact People Anim 1996, 9(4):182–187.
Répteis e as populações humanas no Brasil:uma abordagem etnoherpe-
66. Gomez LM, Larsen KW, Walton P: ‘Snake Talks’ in the Classroom: Do They
tológica. In A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas
Influence Children’s Attitudes. Herpetol Rev 2004, 35(4):338–340.
Futuras. Edited by Alves RRN, Souto WMS, Mourão JS. Recife: NUPEEA;
67. Dodd CK Jr: Ecology and Behavior, Strategies for snake conservation.
2010:121–146.
New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1993:363–393.
42. Moura MR, Costa HC, São-Pedro VA, Fernandes VD, Feio RN: O
68. Bevins RA, Bitgood S: Developing a Device to Assess Attitudes Toward
relacionamento entre pessoas e serpentes no Leste de Minas Gerais,
Snakes. In Visitor Studies: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edition. Edited
Sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotropica 2010, 10(4):1–9.
by Jacksonville BS. EUA: Center for Social Design; 1989:123–130.
43. Brito AC, Barbosa IR: Epidemiologia dos acidentes ofídicos no Estado do 69. Kellert SR: The value of life: biological diversity and human society.
Rio Grande do Norte. ConScientiae Saúde 2012, 11(4):535-542. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1996.
44. Pinto LCL, Mateus MB, Pires MRS: Conhecimentos e usos da fauna
terrestre por moradores rurais da Serra do Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais.
doi:10.1186/1746-4269-10-30
Brasil Interciencia 2012, 37:520–527.
Cite this article as: Alves et al.: Students’ attitudes toward and
45. Barrera-Bassols N, Toledo VM: Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: knowledge about snakes in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil.
symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources. J Lat Am Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014 10:30.
Geogr 2005, 4(1):9–41.
46. Knight AJ: “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and
negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species
protection. J Environ Psychol 2008, 28(1):94–103.
47. Prokop P, Ozel M, Usak M: Cross-cultural comparison of student attitudes
toward snakes. Soc Anim 2009, 17(3):224–240.
48. Prokop P, Tunnicliffe SD: Disgusting” animals: primary school children’s
attitudes and myths of bats and spiders. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ
2008, 4(2):87–97.
49. Prokop P, Fancovicova J, Kubiatko M: Vampires are still alive: Slovakian
students’ attitudes toward bats. Anthrozoos Multidisciplinary J Interact
People Anim 2009, 22(1):19–30.