Solution combustion synthesis of β‑Cu V O nanoparticles: photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet under UV and visible light illumination
Solution combustion synthesis of β‑Cu V O nanoparticles: photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet under UV and visible light illumination
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-022-02273-z
Received: 25 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published online: 25 July 2022
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2022
Abstract
β-Cu2V2O7 nanoparticles were prepared using a solution-combustion method using
two different fuels, which are: Urea and Glycine. The as-prepared catalysts were
characterized using X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectra, scanning
electron microscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller Method, and UV–Vis diffusive
reflectance spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of copper vanadate was inves-
tigated by degradation of cationic dye crystal violet in an aqueous solution under
UV and visible light irradiation. The effect of selected parameters such as catalyst
mass, dye concentration, and solution pH on the catalytic performances has been
discussed. On the other hand, the reuse tests of β-Cu2V2O7 displayed high-perfor-
mance stability after five cycles.
* Khadija Khallouk
khadija.khallouk@usmba.ac.ma
1
Laboratory of Materials, Processes, Catalysis and Environment, High School of Technology,
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, BP 2427 Fez, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Natural Substances, Pharmacology, Environment, Modeling, Health and Quality
of Life, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Taza, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University,
BP 1223 Taza, Morocco
3
IATE, Montpellier SupAgro, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, 2, Place Pierre Viala,
34060 Montpelier, France
4
Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Hay Moulay Rachid, 43150 Ben Guerir,
Morocco
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
2798 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
Introduction
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2799
For these different advantages, we believe that solution combustion synthesis will
significantly improve the photocatalytic properties of our β-Cu2V2O7 photocatalyst
material. This method was adopted to prepare β-Cu2V2O7 using two fuel sources
which are: urea and glycine. The photocatalytic performances of the as-prepared
materials were evaluated by photocatalytic degradation of an aqueous crystal violet
solution. The potential use of β-Cu2V2O7 as a photocatalytic material, as well as
the mechanism of enhancing the photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light
illumination were also covered in this study through the use of a panoply of analyses
namely; XRD, SEM–EDS, FTIR, BET and DRS.
NH4VO3 (Sigma Aldrich) and Cu ( NO3)2.3H2O (Sigma Aldrich) were used as vana-
dium and copper precursors. Urea ( CH4N2O) and Glycine ( C2H5NO2) were used as
fuels agents. All chemical products are used without further purification.
The synthesis of β-Cu2V2O7 photocatalyst was conducted by a solution-com-
bustion technique. Copper pyrovanadate samples were prepared using two different
fuels. Initially, two solutions of equal volume containing Cu (NO3)2.3H2O (3.44 g)
and NH3VO4 (1.11 g) were dissolved in 100 mL of Deionized water (DI). Subse-
quently, each of the fuels investigated (0.15 g of glycine, and 0.17 g of urea,) was
added separately to each prepared solution. The two mixtures prepared were stirred
softly to obtain a homogeneous solution both solutions were heated and evaporated
at about 100 °C to form a dark green gel. Both gels swelled and became foamy and
were quickly placed in the oven at 500 °C for 1 h, resulting the formation of two
materials as brown powders. The two products were collected for characterization.
Crystal violet dye (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for photocatalytic testing. The photo-
catalytic performance of the prepared β-Cu2V2O7 to degrade Crystal violet dye was
examined in a quartz reactor (250 mL) equipped with four ultraviolet (UV) lamps
(17 W 24 Inch T8 Fluorescent tube) for UV illumination tests, and a 100 W m − 2
Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) as the visible light source for Visible light illumination
Tests. A suspension containing 200 ml of 10 ppm of Crystal violet and 1 g/L of the
β-Cu2V2O7 catalyst is continuously stirred at 750 rpm and air-bubbled at room tem-
perature and under UV illumination. During the photocatalytic reaction, samples of
5 mL were collected from the solution, separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for
5 min and analyzed by UV–Vis spectroscopy using J.P. SELECTA, S.A. VR-2000
spectrophotometer at the maximum absorbance wavelength 586 nm for Crystal vio-
let [41, 42] to obtain the remaining concentration.
Adsorption tests of Crystal violet over β-Cu2V2O7 in the dark, as well as Crys-
tal violet photolysis under UV and visible light illumination, were also evaluated
13
2800 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
under the same conditions. The experimental setup used for photocatalytic tests was
reported in [21].
Characterization techniques
The obtained products; urea and glycine assisted Cu2V2O7 material were analyzed
using XRD pattern. The XRD results in Fig. 1 confirm, for both products, the pres-
ence of characteristic peaks of β-Cu2V2O7 (Ziesite) phase structure according to
the reference data PDF # 026-0569, which has been reported to have a monoclinic
crystal structure with the space group C2/c (15). The peaks around the 12° 2θ posi-
tion correspond to the vanadium oxide phase which shows the presence of this phase
especially in the glycine assisted β-Cu2V2O7 material [45].
In fact, from the findings, combustion synthesis can produce single-structured
photocatalytic materials at low temperatures (without the need for calcination),
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2801
compared to almost all other methods that require additional thermal treatment,
which can be considered as a cost-effective advantage for this synthesis process.
Moreover, during the combustion process, the structure can undergo some
changes such as micro-deformations, internal distortions, etc. In this regard, the
microstrain and crystallite size of the two prepared materials were examined, as
shown in Fig. 2, by applying the Williamson-Hall method as described previously
[46, 47].
According to these results, we can observe that the crystallites size, for the
product with urea, is approximately 431.1 ± 322.7 nm, values that remain a lit-
tle high compared to those of the product with glycine that presents a size around
63.2 ± 20.6 nm, being characterized by a relatively low microstrain (0.03%) com-
pared to that of the material with urea (0.21%).
The observed FT-IR spectrum recorded for both synthesized β-Cu2V2O7 mate-
rial using urea and glycine, is displayed in Fig. 3. According to the spectrum, the
absorption peaks manifested around position 1618 cm−1 correspond to the vibra-
tional modes of the bound water molecule, including the stretching and the bend-
ing modes of H–O and H–O–H, respectively. The bands occurring between 1000
and 800 cm−1 are mainly due to the stretching vibrations of the V=O mode and the
antisymmetric stretching vibrations of V–O–V. Also, the band appeared towards the
632 cm−1 position corresponds to the symmetric stretching vibration of the triply
coordinated oxygen of β-Cu2V2O7. As well, the absorption bands observed between
600 and 500 cm−1can be attributed to the Cu–O stretching vibration, confirming the
formation of copper vanadate compound [48–51].
13
2802 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
Fig. 2 Williamson–Hall plots for the synthesized β-Cu2V2O7 material using urea and glycine fuel agents
Figure 4 shows the morphology of the β-Cu2V2O7 material synthesized with dif-
ferent fuel agents. As shown in the micrographs, for both products, it is clearly
seen that the morphology is not homogeneous enough. The observed morphol-
ogy for the glycine-assisted β-Cu2V2O7 material consists of irregular and elon-
gated nano-spheres with sizes ranging from 40 to 600 nm. For the urea assisted
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2803
Fig. 3 FT-IR spectrum of the synthesized β-Cu2V2O7 @Urea compared to β-Cu2V2O7 @Glycine
Fig. 4 SEM images of the synthesized β-Cu2V2O7 material at different magnifications; a with urea and b
with glycine
13
2804 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
Table 1 Crystallite size, surface BET and elemental composition of mixed copper vanadium oxides
Sample Crystallite size (nm) BET surface area EDX elemental compo-
(m2/g) sition (% wt)
Cu V O
β-Cu2V2O7 material, the grains have well-defined edges and have a relatively
large size distribution ranging from 50 to 900 nm [52].
The particles distribution of both products suggests and confirms that the com-
bustion synthesis process can provide materials with a higher specific surface
area [53]. The elemental composition is performed using EDX analysis. The two
obtained results on (Table 1) confirm the presence of copper, vanadium and oxygen.
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method
The BET surface area of the prepared mixed copper vanadium oxides were 39 m 2/g
2
and 41 m /g for β-Cu2V2O7@Urea and β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine and its pore volume
was 0.001609 cm3/g. The nitrogen sorption isotherms of the two samples were type
III, displaying a type H3 hysteresis loop in the relative pressure range of 0.83–0.93
and 0.94–0.98 for β-Cu2V2O7@Urea and β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine, and plateaus in the
adsorption branches (Fig. 5), indicative of its intergranular porosity due to the for-
mation of aggregates of plate-like particles forming slit-like pores. We note that the
adsorbed volume remained low until P/P0 equaled 0.83 and 0.98 for β-Cu2V2O7@
Urea and β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine, which corresponds to the constitution of a molec-
ular monolayer. The adsorption of N2 was carried out progressively to generate a
monolayer covering the entire external surface of the CuVO pores. By comparing
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2805
a b 120
1,2 β-Cu2V2O7 @Urea β-Cu2V2O7@Urea
β-Cu2V2O7 @Glycine β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine
100
1,0
80
0,8
Absorbance
60 Eg=1,98 eV
0,6
0,4 40
0,2 20
Eg=2,02 eV
0,0 0
300 400 500 600 700 800 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
Wavelenght (nm)
Fig. 6 A UV–Vis DRS and B the plot of (αhʋ)2 versus hʋ of the β-Cu2V2O7@urea compared to
β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine
13
2806 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
Fig. 7 Adsorption and photodegradation of Crystal violet dye over β-Cu2V2O7 catalyst under optimal
conditions (Reaction time 130 min; C0 = 10 mg L−1; catalyst addition 1 g L−1) under UV light illumina-
tion
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2807
The band gap of β-Cu2V2O7 is around 2.0 eV which is suitable for visible light
absorption [56]. Since the degree of utilization of visible light is one of the indi-
cators to measure the performance of photocatalysts, we have systematically tested
the photocatalytic ability of β-Cu2V2O7 under visible light. Fig. S5 in the Support-
ing information exhibits the degradation of Crystal violet onto β-Cu2V2O7@Urea
and β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine as photocatalysts. All experiments were carried out using
1 g/L of catalysts and 10 mg/L of Crystal violet as initial concentrations. As shown
in Fig. S5, Crystal violet displays a very low conversion rate in the case of photoly-
sis throughout the duration of the test (130 min), which confirms that Visible light
illumination alone cannot degrade Crystal violet under current conditions. In fact,
after activating visible illumination, both materials showed effective photocatalytic
activity under visible illumination for crystal violet, reaching approximately 86%
for β-Cu2V2O7 @Urea and 82% for β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine as shown in the figure. In
this case, the β-Cu2V2O7 photocatalyst, with its narrow band gap, favors the optical
absorption capacity in the visible range.
Conclusion
This study explored a new and simple approach for photocatalytic crystal violet
degradation using mixed copper vanadium oxides synthesized via a simple solution
combustion process using two different fuels. It is suggested that combustion may
be a promising way to synthesize a mixed oxide of copper vanadium with a large
13
2808
13
Table 2 Comparison between our work and other photocatalysts for dye degradation
Photocatalyst Dye Concentration Degradation Degrada- Synthesis method Type of lightning Reference
of the solution percentage tion time
(ppm) (%) (min)
β-Cu2V2O7 Crystal violet 10 98/86 130 Combustion method using Urea as fuel UV/Visible light Present work
95/82 Combustion method using Glycine as
fuel
BiVO4 Methylene blue 10 50–60 120 Hydrothermal UV [57]
Ag/SmVO4 Rhodamine B 10 97 240 Impregnation Visible light [58]
BiOI/Ag3VO4 Triphenylmethane 25 80 180 Solvothermal method followed by the Visible light [59]
chemical precipitation
ZnO: TiO2 Methyl blue 10 90 75 Sol–gel Visible light [60]
Pd-doped TiO2 Methyl blue/methyl orange 20 87.8 180 Sol–gel UV [61]
Cd-doped ZnO Methylene blue 10 85 210 Sol–gel Visible light [38]
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2809
specific surface area; however, the fuel has no significant influence on the specific
surface area and the pore volumes.
The efficiency of dye removal processes was affected by the initial concentra-
tion of the pollutant, pH and catalyst amount. As a result, increasing pH led to an
increase in the photocatalytic removal efficiency, while the increase of dye initial
concentration decreased the conversion efficiency.
The narrow band gap of both synthesized catalysts (β-Cu2V2O7@Urea and
β-Cu2V2O7@Glycine) is the primary evidence for the two materials to be active in
visible light for the photocatalytic application. The β-Cu2V2O7 material obtained
using urea or glycine showed good catalytic behavior for the degradation of the stud-
ied dye under UV and visible light illumination.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11144-022-02273-z.
References
1. Nguyen CH, Fu CC, Juang RS (2018) Degradation of methylene blue and methyl orange by palla-
dium-doped TiO2 photocatalysis for water reuse: efficiency and degradation pathways. J Clean Prod
202:413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.08.110
2. Zhang D, Zeng F (2011) Visible light-activated cadmium-doped ZnO nanostructured photocata-
lyst for the treatment of methylene blue dye. J Mater Sci 47(5):2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/
S10853-011-6016-4
3. Loubna N, Youssef M, Ouissal A et al (2019) Kinetic and thermodynamicstudy of the adsorption
of twodyes: brilliant green and eriochrome black T using a natural adsorbent “sugarcane bagasse.”
Treat Watewater 7:652–659
4. Benalia MC, Youcef L, Bouaziz MG, Achour S, Menasra H (2021) Removal of heavy metals from
industrial wastewater by chemical precipitation: mechanisms and sludge characterization. Arab J Sci
Eng 47:5587–5599
5. Zhao C, Zhou J, Yan Y et al (2021) Application of coagulation/flocculation in oily wastewater treat-
ment: a review. Sci Total Environ 765:142795. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.142795
6. Salmerón I, Rivas G, Oller I et al (2021) Nanofiltration retentate treatment from urban wastewater
secondary effluent by solar electrochemical oxidation processes. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/
10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2020.117614
7. Zhang X, Liu Y (2021) Reverse osmosis concentrate: an essential link for closing loop of munici-
pal wastewater reclamation towards urban sustainability. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.
2020.127773
8. Abd Elkodous M, El-Sayyad GS, Abdel Maksoud MIA et al (2021) Nanocomposite matrix conju-
gated with carbon nanomaterials for photocatalytic wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater. https://
doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.124657
9. Chong M, Jin B, Chow C et al (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment tech-
nology: a review. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039
10. Bahnemann D (2004) Photocatalytic water treatment: solar energy applications. Sol Energy 77:445–
459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2004.03.031
11. Zhu N, Tang J, Tang C et al (2018) Combined CdS nanoparticles-assisted photocatalysis and peri-
phytic biological processes for nitrate removal. Chem Eng J 353:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
CEJ.2018.07.121
12. Sun C, Yang J, Xu M et al (2022) Recent intensification strategies of SnO2-based photocatalysts: a
review. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.131564
13. Wu S, Cao H, Yin S et al (2009) Amino acid-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalysis of
SnO2 nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 113:17893–17898. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP9068762
13
2810 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
14. Rather RA, Mehta A, Lu Y et al (2021) Influence of exposed facets, morphology and hetero-inter-
faces of BiVO4 on photocatalytic water oxidation: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:21866–
21888. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.04.060
15. Nguyen TD, Nguyen VH, Nanda S et al (2020) B iVO4 photocatalysis design and applications to
oxygen production and degradation of organic compounds: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18:1779–
1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10311-020-01039-0
16. Naqvi FK, Beg S, Anwar K (2020) Synthesis of visible light active copper, iron co-doped BiVO4
photocatalyst for the degradation of phenol. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 131(1):409–422. https://doi.org/
10.1007/S11144-020-01863-Z
17. Daghrir R, Drogui P, Robert D (2013) Modified TiO2 for environmental photocatalytic applications:
a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3581–3599. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE303468T
18. da Silva TF, Cavalcante RP, Guelfi DRV et al (2022) Photo-anodes based on B-doped T iO2 for pho-
toelectrocatalytic degradation of propyphenazone: identification of intermediates, and acute toxicity
evaluation. J Environ Chem Eng 10:107212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2022.107212
19. Belghiti M, Tanji K, el Mersly L et al (2022) Fast and non-selective photodegradation of basic yel-
low 28, malachite green, tetracycline, and sulfamethazine using a nanosized ZnO synthesized from
zinc ore. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11144-022-02232-8
20. Ong CB, Ng LY, Mohammad AW (2018) A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts:
synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:536–551. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.RSER.2017.08.020
21. Zouheir M, Assila O, Tanji K et al (2021) Bandgap optimization of sol–gel-derived TiO2 and its
effect on the photodegradation of formic acid. Nano Futures 5:025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/
2399-1984/ABFB7D
22. Hong YC, Bang CU, Shin DH, Uhm HS (2005) Band gap narrowing of TiO2 by nitrogen doping in
atmospheric microwave plasma. Chem Phys Lett 413:454–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPLETT.
2005.08.027
23. Wiktor J, Reshetnyak I, Strach M et al (2018) Sizable excitonic effects undermining the photocata-
lytic efficiency of β-Cu2V2O7. J Phys Chem Lett 9:5698–5703. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JPCLE
TT.8B02323
24. Zhang S, Sun Y, Li C, Ci L (2013) C u3V2O8 hollow spheres in photocatalysis and primary lithium
batteries. Solid State Sci 25:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLIDSTATESCIENCES.2013.08.
003
25. Shi R, Wang Y, Zhou F, Zhu Y (2011) Z n3V2O7(OH)2(H2O)2 and Z n3V2O8 nanostructures: con-
trolled fabrication and photocatalytic performance. J Mater Chem 21:6313–6320. https://doi.org/10.
1039/C0JM04451B
26. Ghiyasiyan-Arani M, Masjedi-Arani M, Salavati-Niasari M (2016) Novel Schiff base ligand-assisted
in-situ synthesis of Cu3V2O8 nanoparticles via a simple precipitation approach. J Mol Liq 216:59–
66. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2015.12.100
27. Ghiyasiyan-Arani M, Masjedi-Arani M, Salavati-Niasari M (2016) Facile synthesis, characteriza-
tion and optical properties of copper vanadate nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic activity. J
Mater Sci 27(5):4871–4878. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-016-4370-3
28. Ghiyasiyan-Arani M, Masjedi-Arani M, Salavati-Niasari M (2016) Facile synthesis, characteriza-
tion and optical properties of copper vanadate nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic activity. J
Mater Sci 27:4871–4878. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-016-4370-3
29. Khallouk K, Solhy A, Kherbeche A et al (2020) Effective catalytic delignification and fractionation
of lignocellulosic biomass in water over Zn3V2O8 mixed oxide. ACS Omega 5:304–316. https://doi.
org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.9B02159
30. Luo Y, Xu X, Tian X et al (2016) Facile synthesis of a C o3V2O3 interconnected hollow microsphere
anode with superior high-rate capability for Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:5075–5080
31. Sajid MM, Zhai H, Shad NA et al (2021) Photocatalytic performance of ferric vanadate (FeVO4)
nanoparticles synthesized by hydrothermal method. Mater Sci Semicond Process 129:105785.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSSP.2021.105785
32. Wang G, Liang Y, Song J et al (2022) Co-doped MnCeOx/ZrO2 catalysts for low temperature
selective catalytic reduction of NO. Res Chem Intermed 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/
S11164-022-04701-0
33. Martin A, Zhang Y, Meisel M (1997) Effect of the surface vanadium valence state on activity and
selectivity properties of (VO)2P2O7 used as catalyst in the ammoxidation of toluene. React Kinet
Catal Lett 60(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477682
13
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812 2811
34. Salah A, Benkhouja K, Jaafari K et al (2005) Structural characterization and magnetic properties
of divanadates ZnMV2O7 (M= Co, Ni and Cu). J Alloys Compd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.
2005.01.065
35. Samani M, Ardakani MH, Sabet M (2022) Efficient and selective oxidation of hydrocarbons with
tert-butyl hydroperoxide catalyzed by oxidovanadium(IV) unsymmetrical Schiff base complex sup-
ported on γ-Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles. Res Chem Intermed 48(4):1481–1494. https://doi.org/
10.1007/S11164-022-04656-2
36. Belaïche M, Bakhache M, Drillon M et al (2004) Effect of non-magnetic impurities on the low-
temperature susceptibility of the linear antiferromagnet CuxZn1−xV2O6. Chem Phys Lett. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.114
37. Wei Q, Wang Q, Li Q et al (2018) Pseudocapacitive layered iron vanadate nanosheets cathode for
ultrahigh-rate lithium ion storage. Nano Energy 47:294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOEN.
2018.02.028
38. Zhang D, Zeng F (2012) Visible light-activated cadmium-doped ZnO nanostructured photocata-
lyst for the treatment of methylene blue dye. J Mater Sci 47:2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/
S10853-011-6016-4
39. Zhang S, Hou M, Hou L, Lu M (2016) Synthesis and electrochemical performance of cable-like
copper vanadates/polypyrrole nanobelts as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem Phys
Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2016.06.046
40. Hossain MK, Sotelo P, Sarker HP et al (2019) Rapid one-pot synthesis and photoelectrochemical
properties of copper vanadates. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:2837–2847. https://doi.org/10.1021/
ACSAEM.9B00179/SUPPL_FILE/AE9B00179_SI_001.PDF
41. Heshmati S, Hossini H (2019) Oxidation of crystal violet in aqueous solutions using the fenton pro-
cess view project now de-toxicity using bioelectrochemical system, bioenergy, biofilm treatment. Int
J Health Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhls.94090
42. Karam FF, Hassan FF, Hessoon HM (2021) Adsorption of toxic crystal violet dye using (Chitosan-
OMWCNTs) from aqueous solution. J Phys 1999:012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/
1999/1/012015
43. Monshi A, Foroughi MR, Monshi MR (2012) Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accu-
rately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J Nano Sci Eng 02:154–160. https://doi.org/10.4236/
WJNSE.2012.23020
44. Makuła P, Pacia M, Macyk W (2018) How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified
semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J Phys Chem Lett 9:6814–6817. https://doi.
org/10.1021/ACS.JPCLETT.8B02892/SUPPL_FILE/JZ8B02892_LIVESLIDES.MP4
45. Keerthana SP, Yuvakkumar R, Kumar PS et al (2022) Surfactant induced copper vanadate
(β-Cu2V2O7, Cu3V2O8) for different textile dyes degradation. Environ Res 211:112964. https://doi.
org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.112964
46. Yao J, Shen C, Zhang P et al (2012) Enhanced cycle ability of spinel L iMn2O4 by controlling the
phase purity and structural strain. J Phys Chem Solids 73:1390–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
JPCS.2012.07.006
47. Kwon SN, Song J, Mumm DR (2011) Effects of cathode fabrication conditions and cycling on the
electrochemical performance of LiNiO2 synthesized by combustion and calcination. Ceram Int
37:1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.01.028
48. Muthamizh S, Yesuraj J, Jayavel R et al (2021) Microwave synthesis of β-Cu2V2O7 nanorods: struc-
tural, electrochemical supercapacitance, and photocatalytic properties. J Mater Sci 32(3):2744–
2756. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-020-05007-W
49. Kayani ZN, Umer M, Riaz S, Naseem S (2015) Characterization of copper oxide nanoparticles
fabricated by the sol-gel method. J Electron Mater 44(10):3704–3709. https://doi.org/10.1007/
S11664-015-3867-5
50. Zhou X, Wu G, Wu J et al (2014) Carbon black anchored vanadium oxide nanobelts and their post-
sintering counterpart (V2O5 nanobelts) as high performance cathode materials for lithium ion batter-
ies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:3973–3982. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP54428A
51. Ethiraj AS, Kang DJ (2012) Synthesis and characterization of CuO nanowires by a simple wet
chemical method. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-70/FIGURES/4
52. Song A, Chemseddine A, Ahmet IY et al (2020) Evaluation of copper vanadate (β-Cu2V2O7) as a
photoanode material for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. https://
doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.9B04909/SUPPL_FILE/CM9B04909_SI_001.PDF
13
2812 Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis (2022) 135:2797–2812
53. el Khalfaouy R, Turan S, Rodriguez MA et al (2020) Solution combustion synthesis and electro-
chemical properties of yttrium-doped LiMnPO4/C cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J
Rare Earths 38:976–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRE.2019.06.004
54. Alkorbi AS, Kumar KY, Prashanth MK et al (2022) Samarium vanadate affixed sulfur self doped
g-C3N4 heterojunction; photocatalytic, photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen evolution and dye degrada-
tion. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:12988–13003. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2022.02.071
55. Sahoo C, Gupta A, Pigments AP-D (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet (CI Basic
Violet 3) on silver ion doped TiO2. Elsevier, Amsterdam
56. Muthamizh S, Yesuraj J, Jayavel R et al (2021) Microwave synthesis of β-Cu2V2O7 nanorods: struc-
tural, electrochemical supercapacitance, and photocatalytic properties. J Mater Sci 32:2744–2756.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-020-05007-W/SCHEMES/2
57. Obregón S, Caballero A, Colón G (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis of B iVO4: structural and mor-
phological influence on the photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B 117–118:59–66. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.APCATB.2011.12.037
58. Li T, He Y, Cai J et al (2013) Preparation and characterization of Ag-loaded S mVO4 for photoca-
talysis application. Photochem Photobiol 89:529–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHP.12019
59. Wang S, Guan Y, Wang L et al (2015) Fabrication of a novel bifunctional material of BiOI/Ag3VO4
with high adsorption–photocatalysis for efficient treatment of dye wastewater. Appl Catal B. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.047
60. Upadhyay GK, Rajput JK, Pathak TK et al (2019) Synthesis of ZnO:TiO2 nanocomposites for pho-
tocatalyst application in visible light. Vacuum 160:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACUUM.
2018.11.026
61. Nguyen CH, Fu C-C, Juang R-S (2018) Degradation of methylene blue and methyl orange by palla-
dium-doped TiO2 photocatalysis for water reuse: efficiency and degradation pathways. J Clean Prod.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.110
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
13