0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views3 pages

Fire & Ice

Uploaded by

Rahul Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views3 pages

Fire & Ice

Uploaded by

Rahul Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

“Fire and Ice”

Summary

The speaker weighs up two different scenarios for the end of the world. Some people think the

world will end in fire, whereas others think ice is more likely. Based on the speaker's experiences

with desire, he tends to agree with those who believe fire is the more likely scenario. If the world

were to end twice, however, the speaker feels that, based on his knowledge of human hatred, ice

would be an equally powerful method of destruction—and would do the job sufficiently

Theme

Hatred, Desire, and the End of the World

Despite its light and conversational tone, “Fire and Ice” is a bleak poem that highlights human

beings’ talent for self-destruction. The poem is a work of eschatology(the part of theology concerned

with death)—writing about the end of the world—and poses two possible causes for this end:

fire and ice. The speaker uses these natural elements as symbols for desire and hatred,

respectively, arguing that both emotions left unchecked have the capacity to destroy civilization

itself.

The speaker begins by relating that, when it comes to how the world will end, “some” people favor

fire and “some” ice. At this early stage of the poem, these two elements could easily relate to a

natural disaster. For example, a potential world-ending “fire” could be something like the asteroid
that most likely destroyed the dinosaurs; and ice could relate to a future ice age, or the

extinguishment of the sun. But as soon as those more naturalistic ends to the world are suggested,

the poem changes direction and makes it clear that fire and ice are symbols—not of natural

disasters, but of humanity’s ability to create disasters of its own.

By “fire” the speaker actually means “desire”—and from the speaker’s limited personal experience,

the speaker knows desire to be a powerfully destructive force. Humanity, then, could bring about the

end of the world through passion, anger, violence, greed, and bloodlust. Indeed, the “fire” now

seems like an image of warfare too. (Indeed, the poem was written shortly after then end of World

War I.)

Though the speaker feels “fire” is the likely way for humanity to destroy itself and the world, the

speaker also feels that human beings’ capacity for destruction is so great that it could bring about

this destruction more than once. (This is tongue-in-cheek, of course, as once would certainly be

enough.) Here, the speaker presents “ice” as another method for ending it all, aligning it with hatred.

Ice works differently from fire in this eschatological prediction. Human destruction doesn’t have to

be bright, noisy, and violent—hate can spread in more subtle ways. Ice has connotations of coldness

and indifference, and so a possible reading here is that the end of the world could be brought about

by inaction rather than some singular major event. A contemporary reading could map climate

change onto “ice” here: if people fail to act over humanity’s effect on the climate, it will gradually,

but assuredly, bring about destruction.

By the poem’s end, though, the choice between “ice” and “fire” starts to seem a little false—

particularly as the speaker’s tone is so casual and even glib (“ice is also great”). Ice and fire, though

utterly different in the literal sense, here represent one and the same thing: the destructive potential
of humanity. Either method will suffice to bring about the inevitable end of the world. In just nine

short lines, then, “Fire and Ice” offers a powerful warning about human nature. Finally, it’s important

to notice something that isn’t in the poem: any hint of a possibility that humanity won’t end the

world.

Fire and Ice Literary devices

1. Rhyming scheme- Aba

abc
bcb

2. Assonance- it is repetition of vowel sounds in same line. The repetition is at different places in
different words.

Example- The long sound of “o” in “I hold with those who favour fire”

3. Alliteration- alliteration is the repetition of a consonant sound at the start of two or more closely
placed words.

Example- The sound of “f” in “favour fire”, “w” in “world will”

4. Imagery- Imagery is used to make readers perceive things involving their five senses. Example- “Some
say the world will end in fire”

“To say that for destruction ice Is also great”

5. Anaphora- the repetition of a word or expression at the start of two or more consecutive lines.

Example – “Some say” is repeated at the start of lines 1 and 2.

6. Personification- Personification is to give human qualities to inanimate objects. In this poem, “fire”
and “ice” are capable of destruction. Thus, the poet personifies fire and ice by giving them mind and
power to destroy anything.

7. Enjambment- it is defined as the thought or clause that does not come to an end at a line break, rather
it moves over to the next line.

Example- “From what I’ve tasted of desire

I hold with those who favor fire”

You might also like