Format No: F-02(PRC-P-03)
LECTRIX E-VEHICLES PVT LTD Rev. No: 00
SUPPLIER PROCESS & PRODUCT AUDIT CHECK SHEET Effective Date: 01-08-2022
Supplier NamHEADWAY INDUSTRIES Audit Date :
Plant Location
KANKROLA SEC 87 Area :
Part Description : Auditor :
Auditee:
S. No Check Items Result Score Remarks
1 ) Operating Instructions/Work Instructions/Standard Operating Sheet
Are all the product SOS / set up WI sheets available at
1.1 O 2
the location?
1.2 Are latest drawings available with the supplier ? O 2
Are the statements of instruction in local language
1.3 O 2
(operator readable & understandable)?
Is the operation following the sequence of steps used
1.4 O 2
as per the WI / standard operating sheet?
1.5 Is Control Plan available for this process. O 2
Is significant, critical characteristics & control method
1.6 O 2
identified in Control plan?
2 ) Process Control
Are Instructions for safety wear on shop floor / process
2.1 O 2
displayed.
Is operator wear PPE during working i.e Shoes, helmet,
2.2 O 2
goggles etc.
Is Skill matrix updated & is operator aware about
2.3 O 2
process/ product ?
Is proper area with traceability available for raw
2.4 O 2
material storage ?
Is raw material stored in proper racks/ trolleys/ bins
2.5 O 2
with identification ?
Is start up check sheet available & Is there system to
2.6 O 2
record data in start up check sheet ?
Is there system to start machine when all setup /
2.7 O 2
process parameter within specification.
Is action taken if setup / process parameter not within
2.8 S 1
specification.
2.9 Is tool life monitoring of tool as per defined tool life. O 2
Is there system and recording of first piece / set up
2.10 O 2
approval.
2.11 Is the First piece & Last piece kept and identified. O 2
Is process control check sheets available on line &
2.12 inspection frequency & Sample size defined as per O 2
control plan.
Is hourly production maintained and verified by
2.13 O 2
supervisor?
Is make entry rejection / rework part in hourly
2.14 production sheet & Verification sign by supervisor for O 2
NG qty.
Do the operators know how to deal with the NC
2.15 O 2
product?
S. No Check Items Result Score Remarks
2.16 Is identification done for rework part & reject part. O 2
Do the rework & repair instructions available, followed
2.17 O 2
& record of rework part maintained?
Is record of rejected part properly maintained and
2.18 O 2
matched with scrap note?
Is there any proper feedback system for pervious
2.19 O 2
operation problem available among the operators?
Is the mistake proofing / Poka Yoke validated whenever
2.20 O 2
start of working.
2.21 Is the operator aware of mistake proofing / Poka Yoke? O 2
2.22 Is action taken in case of Poka Yoke not working? O 2
Is the operator aware of abnormal situation and action
2.23 is taken in case of part made during abnormal O 2
condition?
Are people trained on significant, critical characteristics
2.24 S 1
and its controlling method?
Are limit / master samples / defect matrix displayed at
2.25 inspection area and limit sample are validate during O 2
startup.
Are the products properly identified and traceable
2.26 S 1
during all stages of production ?
Is there identification mark on shop floor for Finish
2.27 O 2
part , WIP, before process & after process etc.
2.28 Are critical processes identified ? O 2
Are clean bins being used and is there any damage
2.29 O 2
bin / box / trolley used in WIP.
Does the supplier have packaging standard defined for
2.30 each part & is the supplier dispatching supplies as per O 2
approved packing std. ?
2.31 Is operator aware about customer, internal complaints O 2
Is corrective action effectively monitoring of complaints
2.32 O 2
at concern process?
Does the supplier have red bins located on each
2.33 O 2
process for rejected parts disposal ?
2.34 Is there proper lighting and Ventilation? O 2
Is 4M change monitored effectively and action taken as
2.35 S 1
defined?
Does the suppler has system for Initial flow control and
2.36 S 1
followed effectively?
3 ) Inspection & Testing
Are instrument & gauge used calibrated and free from
3.1 O 2
any damage.
3.2 Is the Instrument & gauge used as per control plan? O 2
Are required gauges / inspection fixtures / instruments
3.3 O 2
available. Do the instruments checklist followed?
Are the SPC / X bar-R charts filled in correctly (if
3.4 appropriate)? Are they referenced on SPC instruction & O 2
Control plan?
If the process go beyond the control limits, resetting
3.5 S 1
the process is done or not?
S. No Check Items Result Score Remarks
Is cpk value on significant / critical characteristics
3.6 coming more than 1.67, if <1.67 then action plan is O 2
available.
Is Firewall/ PDI station available for part inspection with
3.7 display of Final Inspection Standard & work O 2
instruction ?
Are all type of gauges available at final inspection stage
3.8 O 2
as required by Final Inspection Standard ?
Is skill matrix avilable for inspectors inspecting at
3.9 O 2
Firewall / PDI stations
Total Score 96
O OK No Discrepancy (2 Points) D Major Discrepancy - Major NC (0 points)
Minor Discrepancy - Minor NC (1
s Points)
NA Not Applicable
II - PROCESS CHECKS (Control plan based audit)
Parameter Score
Observatio
Sl No Process Specificatio (0 or Remarks
n
n 2)
Parameter Score
Observatio
Sl No Process Specificatio (0 or Remarks
n
n 2)
Total
III - PRODUCT CHECKS (Verification of FG material available in plant ready for dispatch)
Observatio
Product Parameter Specification Score Remarks
Sl No n
1 Visual Parameter
2 Packing
3 Labeling
4 Bin/ Trolley etc. condition
Total
Note: Supplier process audit weightage- 40%
Control plan based audit weightage- 30%
Product audit weightage- 30%
Previous audit Non Conformities' countermeasure effectiveness:
Customer complaints countermeasure effectiveness:
Improvement points:
Rating Parameter Target Rating Actual Rating Achieved
Process Audit 40%
Control plan based audit 30%
Product Audit 30%
100%
Auditor : Auditee:
Result Criteria:- Marks (In %)
Green ≥80%
Yellow 40~79%
Red <40%
