1
T. E. JACOBSON, D.D.S., AND A. J. KROL, D.D.S.
             PRESENTED BY: DR. KALAIARASI.P (PART I PG)
             GUIDED BY: DR. RUPAL SHAH (PROFESSOR & HOD)
                        DR. SANJAY LAGDIVE (PROFESSOR)
Contents                           2
    About the journal
    About the Author
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Factors affecting stability
    Review of literature
    Critical Evaluation
    References
About the journal                          3
    The Journal Of Prosthetic Dentistry
    Publisher- Elsevier
    Pubmed Indexed journal
    Year of publication- 1983
    Volume – 49
    Issue- 2
    Page no- 166-172
About the Author                                                4
    T. E. Jacobson, D.D.S.
     Assistant Clinical Professor, Removable Prosthodontics
    A. J. Krol, D.D.S.
     Chief of Dental Services, Removable Prosthodontics
     University of California, School of Dentistry, San Francisco,
     Calif., and Veterans Administration Medical Center, San
     Francisco, Calif
Abstract                                        5
    The article has an unstructured abstract
Introduction                                                             6
    Complete denture stability is the resistance to horizontal
     or rotational forces.
    It differs from retention in that stability resists forces in the
     horizontal plane whereas retention is the resistance to
     vertical dislodging forces.
    Stability ensures the physiologic comfort of the patient
     while retention contributes to psychological comfort.
Factors                                               7
affecting                    Ridge
stability                    height
                                                Base
            Occlusal
                                              adaptatio
             factors
                                                 n
                       Stability
                                       Residual
                  Neuromus
                                         ridge
                    cular
                                      relationshi
                   factors
                                            p
Ridge height and conformation                                    8
   Large, square, broad ridges offer a greater resistance to
    lateral forces than do small, narrow, tapered ridges.
   rounded irregularities of the residual ridge also con
    tribute favorably to stability (alveoloplasty must remove
    only bony spicules)
   Square or tapered arches tend to resist rotation of the
    prosthesis better than ovoid arches
   The shape of the palatal vault contributes to stability as
    limited by the length and angulation of the palatal ridge
    slopes. A steep palatal vault may enhance stability.
   Boucher* noted that stability is obtained by
    incorporating the surfaces of the maxillary and
    mandibular ridges, which are at right angle to the
    occlusal plane.
*Boucher, C.: Complete denture impressions based on anatomy
of the mouth. J Am Dent Assoc 31:124, 1944.
Base adaptation                                               9
      Friedman* describes the contacting of the labial
       and buccal flanges with the labial and buccal
       ridge slopes as critical factors contributing to
       stability.
      Adequate extension of the denture border to
       contact maximum of the denture base with facial
       and lingual ridge slopes.
      Positive and intimate contact of the denture base
       with the inclines of the ridges as limited by the
       nature of the overlying soft tissues determines the
       degree of stability attained
*Friedman, S.: Edentulous impression procedures for maximum
retention and stability. J PR~~THET DENT 214, 1957.
Residual ridge relationship                                        10
   A problem of stability is the offset ridge relations seen in
    prognathic and retrognathic patients.
   Weinberg* recognizes the need to set teeth in crossbite
    when the ridges are in a severe crossbite relation.
   The Class III patient frequently displays a lower arch
    anterior to the upper arch in centric relation. Sufficient
    mandibular posterior occlusion must be developed so
    that contact against the maxillary denture extends
    posteriorly more than half the distance from the incisive
    papilla to the hamular notch.
   Without this contact the maxillary denture would tip
    anterosuperiorly, traumatizing the maxillary anterior
    ridge and loosening the maxillary denture.
Neuromuscular control                                        11
    The musculature can facilitate stability in two ways.
    First, the action of certain muscle groups must be
     permitted to occur without interference by the
     denture base so that they will not dislodge the
     prosthesis during function or compromise stability.
    Second, the dentist must recognize that normal
     functioning of some muscle groups can be used to
     enhance stability.
    In 1933 Fish, wrote that “it is not so widely
     understood that the actual shape of the whole of
     the buccal, labial, and lingual surfaces can wreck
     the stability of a denture just as completely as a
     bad impression or wrong bite.”
Occlusal schemes                                            12
    Regardless of the type of posterior tooth form or
     occlusal scheme used, the dentures must be free
     of interferences within the functional range of
     movement of the patient”
    Monoplane (Zero-degree teeth ) may reduce
     horizontal forces by eliminating the inclined planes
     introduced by the cusp angles of anatomic teeth.
    Lingualised occlusion provide both a limited range
     of excursive balance and a directing of forces to
     the lingual side of the lower ridge during working-
     side contacts
Review of literature                                         13
    M.M.Devan in 1954 suggested the neutrocentric
     concept of occlusion , which embodied
     neutralization of cuspal inclines and centralization
     of occlusal forces acting on the denture
     foundation for improved denture stability.
    Friedman in 1957 ,advocated adapting two layer
     of 28 gauge casting wax on the crest of
     mandibular ridge for relief and close contact of
     custom tray in the rest of the area. In maxilla the
     relief is given in the incisive papilla region and in
     case of palatal tori only. Also drill a hole in the
     centre of the tray for the escape of wash material.
                                                           14
   Shanahan in 1962, suggested the dynamic
    impression technique , where the trial denture base
    constructed over the primary cast are loaded with
    impression material and impression of tissue is
    made by patient assisted movements and doctor
    assisted movements . Later the patient is allowed
    to use the tray for 2 days , allowing the impression
    material to still flow and adjust in accordance with
    patient’s tissues. This can help in proper extension
    of tray and improved stability.
Beresin, V. E., and Schiesser, F. J.: The Neutral Zone in Complete and   15
Partial Dentures, ed 2. St. Louis, 1978, The C. V. Mosby Co
   NEUTRAL ZONE
  The neutral zone is that area in
  the potential denture space
  where the forces of the tongue
  pressing outward are neutralized
  by forces of the cheeks and lips
  pressing inward. Since these
  forces are dev eloped through
  muscular contraction during the
  v arious functions of chewing,
  speaking, and swallowing, they
  v ary in magnitude and direction
  in different indiv iduals. In sev ere
  resorbed ridges , working within
  the neutral zone enhances
  stability
Summary and conclusion                                        16
    Both complete denture stability and retention are
     essential in providing successful prosthetic
     treatment.
    The factors that contribute to these properties are
     highly interrelated, and the constant interaction
     between stability and retention often makes them
     indistinguishable.
    The factor of stability involve the tissue, occlusal,
     and polished surfaces of the denture.
    Care must be taken in the development of all
     three of these surfaces to ensure optimal stability of
     the final prosthesis.
Critical evaluation                                      17
    Title: It is appropriate.
    Abstract: It is non structured and lacks adequate
     content.
    Introduction: It is crispy and has addressed the
     issue aptly.
    Discussion: This section gave numerous take home
     points but the order of tittles discussed is
     haphazardly arranged .
References                                                                                  18
   Friedman, S.: Edentulous impression procedures for maximum retention and stability.
    J PR~~THET DENT 214, 1957.
   Boucher, C.: Complete denture impressions based on anatomy of the mouth. J Am
    Dent Assoc 31:124, 1944.
   Fish, W. E.: Using the muscles to stabilize the full lower denture. J Am Dent Assoc
    Zlh2163, 1933.
   Roberts, A. L.: Principles of full denture impression making and their application in
    practice. J PROSTHET DENT 1:213,1951.
   Edwards, L. F., and Boucher, C. 0.: Anatomy of the mouth in relation to complete
    dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 29331,1942.
   Shanahan, T. E. J.: Stabilizing lower dentures on unfavorable ridges. J PROSTHET DENT
    12~420, 1962.
   Lundquist, D. 0.: An electromyographic analysis of the function of the buccinator
    muscle as an aid to denture retention and stabilization. J PROSTHET DENT 9:44, 1959.
   Schiesser, Jr., F. J.: The neutral zone and polished surfaces in complete dentures. J
    PROSTHET DENT 14:854, 1964.
   Beresin, V. E., and Schiesser, F. J.: The Neutral Zone in Complete and Partial
    Dentures, ed 2. St. Louis, 1978, The C. V. Mosby Co.