BritoNetoetal 2024
BritoNetoetal 2024
Science
variable of empty body weight, empty body
cambridge.org/ags weight gain and retained energy of hair sheep
Antonio de Sousa Brito Neto1, Caio Julio Lima Herbster1,
Animal Research Paper Marcos Inacio Marcondes2 , Juana Catarina Cariri Chagas3,
Ronaldo Lopes Oliveira4, Leilson Rocha Bezerra5 , Luciano Pinheiro da Silva1
Cite this article: Brito Neto AdeS, Herbster
CJL, Marcondes MI, Chagas JCC, Oliveira RL, and Elzania Sales Pereira1
Bezerra LR, da Silva LP, Pereira ES (2024).
Using carcass information as a predictor 1
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil; 2Department of Animal
variable of empty body weight, empty body
Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA; 3Departament of Applied Animal Science and Welfare,
weight gain and retained energy of hair sheep.
The Journal of Agricultural Science 1–10. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; 4School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859624000455 Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil and 5Center of Health and Agricultural Technology, Federal
University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraiba, Brazil
Received: 6 February 2024
Revised: 2 July 2024
Accepted: 8 July 2024
Abstract
The objective was to develop equations to predict carcass weight (CW), use CW to predict
Keywords: empty body weight (EBW); and carcass gain (CG) to predict empty body weight gain
Carcass gain; energy; meta-analysis; prediction
model; sheep
(EBWG) and retained energy (RE) in hair sheep. To generate the prediction models, a data
set was composed of individual measurements from 569 sheep encompassing intact males
Corresponding author: (n = 416), castrated males (n = 51), and females (n = 102). Validation analyses were performed
Elzania Sales Pereira; by using the Model Evaluation System (MES). The prediction equations for CW, EBW, and
Email: elzania@hotmail.com
EBWG were not influenced by sex class (P > 0.05), and the following equations were gener-
ated, respectively: CW (kg) = − 0.234 (±1.1358) + 0.485 (±0.0387) × FBW; EBW (kg) = 1.367
(±0.5472) + 1.681 (±0.0210) × CW and EBWG (kg) = 0.004 (±0.0026) + 1.679 (±0.0758) ×
CG. There was an effect of sex class on the intercept (P = 0.0013) of the relationship between
RE and CG: RE (MJ/day) = 1.448 (±0.0657) × EBW0.75 × CG0.797 (±0.0399); RE (MJ/day) = 1.522
(±0.0699) × EBW0.75 × CG0.797 (±0.0399) and RE (MJ/day) = 1.827 (±0.0739) × EBW0.75 ×
CG0.797 (±0.0399) for intact males, castrated males and females, respectively. This study
highlights the importance of incorporating carcass information into EBW, EBWG, and RE
predictions. Replacing empty body weight gain with carcass gain might be a suitable alterna-
tive to estimate the retained energy of hair sheep. In addition, the generated equations will
provide support for meat production systems in carcass weight prediction.
Introduction
Hair sheep are commonly used in meat production systems in tropical regions (Araújo et al.,
2017) due to the perception that they are more resistant to harsh environments and heat tol-
erant (Costa et al., 2013; McManus et al., 2020) and therefore offer a valuable genetic resource.
Studies of nutritional requirements are frequently compiled and generate representative and
practical recommendations for animal feeding. This information and learning cycle strongly
depend on the predictive capacity of mathematical equations (Tedeschi, 2023), which, through
the relationship between variables, allow the estimation of parameters with biological mean-
ings. Body weight adjustments represent an indispensable tool for estimating animal perform-
ance in feeding tests, nutritional requirement studies, and production systems (Herbster et al.,
2020).
Empty body weight (EBW) is a basic measurement for nutritional trials, as it accurately repre-
sents the mass of body tissues (BR-CORTE, 2023) and, therefore, the calculation of requirements
is carried out based on EBW (Oliveira et al., 2018). However, as the EBW is determined labori-
ously, we must seek estimation equations that can be easily applied in a practical scenario, facili-
tating the nutritionist’s work in formulating diets. Within this scenario, information about the
carcass can be associated with EBW, empty body weight gain (EBWG), and retained energy
(RE) as it represents tissue deposition during the animal’s growth.
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Meyer et al. (1960) suggested the use of the term corrected carcass to evaluate the response
Cambridge University Press of beef cattle to various treatments. This measure, which is essentially the carcass weight cor-
rected to a standard caloric value, has the advantage of removing the effect of fill. Furthermore,
with this variable a larger volume of data can be available, generated in non-experimental loca-
tions, such as commercial slaughterhouses (Benedeti et al., 2021), which can provide new data
sets for future estimates or validation of new equations.
The EBWG is a measure highly correlated with RE in the body obtained as the FBW minus the GIT, bladder, and gallbladder
and it is therefore useful in many models of energy requirements. contents.
The independent variables input in prediction models must be The carcasses were weighed, refrigerated at 4°C for 24 h, divided
representative of the response variable, easy to obtain, and have in half lengthwise, and then frozen. Subsequently, the non-carcass
a practical relationship with production systems. In this context, components, hides, and right half carcass samples were cut with a
replacing EBWG with carcass gain (CG) in predicting RE is a band saw and ground separately in an industrial meat grinder.
viable alternative, considering that carcass weight (CW) contains After grinding and homogenization, samples were taken for chem-
a significant proportion of body energy retained in the form of ical analysis. For determination of the body composition, the
protein and fat. Furthermore, CW is a measurement routinely ground samples of the right half-carcasses, non-carcass parts, and
performed on the slaughter line and is less susceptible to meas- hides were pre-dried at 55°C to constant weight and after this per-
urement errors. Equations for predicting CW, as well as the use iod, defatted by extraction with ether in a Soxhlet apparatus
of CG as a predictor variable, can be useful tools for the sheep (AOAC, 1990; method number 920.39) for 12 h (Pereira et al.,
meat production system, as well as animal feeding systems. 2017). Subsequently, the fat-free samples were ground in a ball
Our hypothesis is that CG can be used to predict the RE of hair mill and analysed for dry matter (AOAC, 1990; method 967.03)
sheep. Therefore, our objective was to develop equations to predict and crude protein content (AOAC, 1990; method 984.13).
CW and use CW to predict EBW, and CG to predict EBWG and
RE in hair sheep.
Models and estimation of variables
Materials and methods To estimate the initial EBW and CW of the performance animals in
the comparative slaughter studies, regression equations of the FBW
Description of the data set against the BW, EBW against the FBW, and CW against the EBW
The data set used to generate the models was composed of were generated from the data baseline animals. Likewise, the initial
individual measurements from 569 sheep derived from sixteen body energy of the performance animals was estimated by regres-
studies (Pereira, 2011; Costa et al., 2013; Oliveira et al., 2014; sion equations of the body energy contents against the EBW
Pereira et al., 2014, 2017, 2018a, 2018b; Rodrigues et al., 2016; from the data baseline animals (Herbster et al., 2024).
Gois et al., 2017; Brito Neto, 2020; Mendes et al., 2021; Silva The CG (kg/day) was obtained by the difference between the
et al., 2021; Rocha, 2022; A. C. Rocha, unpublished data; final and initial carcass weight, divided by the number of experi-
A. S. Brito Neto, unpublished data; C. J. L. Herbster, unpublished mental days, within each study. The daily RE (MJ/day) was
data) with records of three sex classes: intact males (n = 416), obtained by the difference between the final and initial body
castrated males (n = 51) and females (n = 102). The most repre- energy content (BEC). The BEC was obtained for each animal
sentative hair sheep genotypes in the data set were: Santa Ines from the body content of protein and fat and their caloric equiva-
(n = 192); Morada Nova (n = 121), Brazilian Somali (n = 47), lents (ARC, 1980) according to the following equation:
½ Dorper × ½ Santa Ines (n = 63) and crossbred (n = 146).
Within this data set, 429 records were originated from compara- BEC = (5.6405 × BPC) + (9.3929 × BFC) (1)
tive slaughter (Pereira, 2011; Costa et al., 2013; Oliveira et al.,
2014; Pereira et al., 2014, 2017, 2018a; Rodrigues et al., 2016; where BEC is the body energy content (MJ); BPC is body protein
Mendes et al., 2021; A. C. Rocha (unpublished data); A. S. Brito content (kg); and BFC is body fat content (kg).
Neto (unpublished data); C. J. L. Herbster (unpublished data)). The CW, EBW and EBWG were estimated through linear
In these studies, 77 animals were slaughtered initially and regressions using the following equations, respectively:
named as reference or baseline group; 114 animals were fed at
maintenance level, and 238 fed above maintenance. The remain- CW = b0 + b1 × FBW (2)
ing records (n = 140) were originated from feeding trials (Gois
et al., 2017; Pereira et al., 2018b; Brito Neto, 2020; Silva et al.,
2021; Rocha, 2022), studies which did not use the comparative EBW = b0 + b1 × CW (3)
slaughter methodology, with animals fed above maintenance.
Information on level of feeding for each study is described in
the supplementary material (Table S1). The quantitative informa- EBWG = b0 + b1 × CG (4)
tion body weight (BW), fasting body weight (FBW), CW, EBW,
and RE were utilized to generate the models (Table 1). where CW is the carcass weight (kg); FBW is fasting body weight
(kg); EBW is the empty body weight (kg); EBWG is empty body
weight gain; CG is the carcass gain; and β0 and β1 correspond to
Slaughter procedures and chemical analyses the intercept and slope of the linear regression, respectively.
Slaughter procedures were similar in all studies. In summary, To predict the RE, the model suggested by the NRC (1984) was
FBW was obtained before slaughter, after 18 h without feed and used, which describes the relationship between the RE and the
water. Slaughter was carried out by stunning with a captive bolt EBWG for a given EBW, being the EBWG variable replaced by
pistol, causing a cerebral concussion and severing of the jugular the CG variable, as suggested by Benedeti et al. (2021):
vein until the animals completely bled, followed by skinning
and evisceration. The blood, internal organs, visceral fat, head, RE = b0 × EBW 0.75 × CGb1 (5)
hooves, and skin were weighed, collected, and frozen. The gastro-
intestinal tract (GIT), bladder, and gallbladder were weighed full, where RE is the retained energy (MJ/day); EBW0.75 is metabolic
emptied, washed, drained, and weighed empty. The EBW was empty body weight (kg); CG is carcass gain (kg/day); β0 is the
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the variables used to generate the prediction models
Items FBW (kg) EBW (kg) CW (kg) EBWG (kg/day) CG (kg/day) RE (MJ/kg0.75 EBW/day)
Sex class
Intact males
n 397 300 416 226 226 226
Average ± SD 28 ± 9.1 22 ± 8.9 13 ± 4.8 0.1 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.042 0.12 ± 0.095
Minimum 8.60 6.67 3.21 −0.147 −0.091 −0.197
Maximum 53.10 44.19 25.65 0.313 0.216 0.365
Castrated males
n 34 51 51 39 39 39
Average ± SD 19 ± 5.2 16 ± 5.4 9 ± 3.0 0.05 ± 0.068 0.02 ± 0.043 0.1 ± 0.11
Minimum 11.60 7.67 3.45 −0.101 −0.076 −0.155
Maximum 29.5 29.33 14.85 0.171 0.082 0.303
Females
n 84 102 102 87 87 87
Average ± SD 23 ± 7.9 18 ± 7.0 10 ± 4.3 0.06 ± 0.060 0.03 ± 0.037 0.1 ± 0.11
Minimum 11.66 8.17 3.88 −0.062 −0.056 −0.087
Maximum 40.00 35.27 21.65 0.235 0.096 0.391
Genotype
Santa Ines
n 192 180 192 130 130 130
Average ± SD 26 ± 10.0 21 ± 9.2 12 ± 5.4 0.09 ± 0.067 0.05 ± 0.042 0.13 ± 0.093
Minimum 10.08 7.76 3.54 −0.035 −0.029 −0.066
Maximum 53.10 44.19 25.65 0.313 0.216 0.332
Morada Nova
n 121 109 121 86 86 86
Average ± SD 22 ± 8.2 18 ± 7.3 10 ± 4.4 0.07 ± 0.042 0.04 ± 0.025 0.11 ± 0.058
Minimum 8.60 6.67 3.21 0.00002 0.0002 −0.002
Maximum 45.60 40.05 23.65 0.164 0.098 0.217
Brazilian Somali
n 47 47 47 39 39 39
Average ± SD 21 ± 6.3 18 ± 6.0 10 ± 3.3 0.09 ± 0.046 0.05 ± 0.023 0.17 ± 0.084
Minimum 10.24 7.96 4.02 0.0003 0.002 0.021
Maximum 34.96 31.18 17.76 0.183 0.092 0.357
½ Dorper × ½ Santa Ines
n 63 63 63 54 54 54
Average ± SD 32 ± 8.5 27 ± 7.4 16 ± 4.4 0.08 ± 0.062 0.05 ± 0.037 0.13 ± 0.090
Minimum 13.50 9.72 5.00 −0.040 −0.025 −0.050
Maximum 49.30 41.66 24.65 0.209 0.126 0.309
Crossbred
n 92 54 146 43 43 43
Average ± SD 31 ± 5.1 17 ± 6.3 12 ± 4.0 0.03 ± 0.102 0.00 ± 0.055 0.06 ± 0.17
Minimum 21.20 7.67 3.49 −0.147 −0.091 −0.197
Maximum 47.12 30.03 22.20 0.235 0.096 0.391
CW, carcass weight; CG, carcass gain; FBW, fasting body weight; EBW, empty body weight; EBWG, empty body weight gain; RE, retained energy; SD, standard deviation.
antilogarithm of the intercept of the linear regression of the loga- Seventeen types of variance-covariance structures were tested,
rithm of RE (MJ/kg0.75 EBW/day) as a function of the logarithm with the choice of structure for defining the most appropriate
of CG (kg/day); and β1 corresponds to the slope of the regression. model based on Akaike’s Information Criteria. Individual obser-
To estimate EBWG and RE, only data from animals fed above vations with Student residuals greater than 2.5 or below −2.5
the maintenance level were used, since the growth pattern of these were considered outliers (Pell, 2000; Tedeschi, 2006) and excluded
animals differs from those feds at the maintenance level. from the data set. When Cook’s distance was greater than 1.0, the
study was considered an outlier and removed from the analysis
(Cook and Weisberg, 1982).
Statistical analysis
The parameters of the linear models were tested using the MIXED
Validation of equations
procedure of SAS (version 9.4, Inst. Inc., Cary, NC), and the sig-
nificance level was set at 0.05. As the data set was composed of An independent validation framework was adopted, which con-
different studies, it was necessary to quantify the variance asso- sisted of searching for studies conducted with hair sheep raised
ciated with the studies using the principles of meta-analysis, in tropical conditions that had the same input information as
described by St-Pierre (2001). The random effect of the study the models generated to predict CW, EBW, EBWG and RE.
was included and tested in the intercept and slope of all models, For CW and EBW we used values of mean of treatments, from
considering the possibility of covariance. The fixed effect of sex published manuscripts, as described in Table 2 and 3. Although,
class on models’ parameters was tested, and when the differences for EBWG and RE we used raw (individual) values extracted from
were significant, an equation was fitted for each sex class. four independent studies.
Table 3. Characteristics of the data sets used to validate the generated SB; systematic bias, MaF; and random errors, MoF; Bibby and
equations Toutenburg, 1977). The root mean square error of prediction
Validation data sets (RMSEP) was used to evaluate model accuracy, and the lower the
RMSEP, the better the model accuracy.
EBWG and
Items CWa EBWa REb
Results
Study (N ) 18 15 4
Sex class did not influence the intercept (P = 0.831) and slope (P
Means of treatments (n) 63 54 – = 0.247) of the linear regression of CW as a function of FBW. The
Animals (n) 512 434 63 lack of effect of sex class was also verified on the intercept (P =
0.807) and slope (P = 0.251) of the linear relationship between
Sex class (n)
EBW and CW, and on the intercept (P = 0.253) and slope (P =
Intact males 456 378 15 0.250) of the linear relationship between EBWG and CG.
Castrated males 56 56 32 Therefore, general equations were adjusted to predict CW (Eqn
(7)), EBW (Eqn (8)), and EBWG (Eqn (9)). For the CW and
Females – – 16
EBWG models, the variance-covariance structure selected was
Genotype (n) Antedependence and for the EBW model the variance-covariance
Santa Ines 270 212 39 structure selected was Autoregressive Heterogeneous.
Morada Nova 106 106 –
CW = −0.234 (+1.1358) + 0.485 (+0.0387) × FBW
Dorper – – 8 (7)
R2 = 0.983; MSE = 0.386; AIC = 1106.5
Crossbred 74 74 –
½ Dorper × ½ Santa 52 42 16
Ines EBW = 1.367 (+0.5472) + 1.681 (+0.0210) × CW
– –
(8)
½ Dorper × ½ 10 R2 = 0.992; MSE = 0.569; AIC = 1075.7
Brazilian Somali
CW (kg) 7.66–21.90 7.66–21.90 –
FBW (kg) 18.64–44.88 – – EBWG = 0.004 (+0.0026) + 1.679 (+0.0758) × CG
(9)
EBW (kg) – 14.38–39.36 – R2 = 0.940; MSE = 0.0001; AIC = −1283
EBWG (kg/day) – – 0.056–0.182
The validation analysis demonstrated that Eqns (7)–(9) can
CG (kg/day) – – 0.043–0.104
adequately predict CW, EBW and EBWG (Table 4), respectively,
RE (MJ/day) – – 0.492–3.182 as the intercept was not different from 0 (P > 0.05) and the slope
CW, carcass weight; CG, carcass gain; FBW, fasting body weight; EBW, empty body weight; was not different from 1 (P > 0.05) in none of the three equations
EBWG, empty body weight gain; RE, retained energy. (Fig. 1), which presented R2 of 0.912, 0.958 and 0.820, respect-
a
Compilation of means of treatments reported by independent publications. ively. For Eqn (7), a CCC of 0.933 and MSEP of 0.859 were
b
Compilation of individual information originating from independent study data sets.
obtained; for Eqn (8), a CCC of 0.972 and MSEP of 1.101; and
Eqn (9), CCC of 0.889 and MSEP of 0.0002.
Model validation analyses were carried out using the Model There was a significant effect of sex class on the intercept (P =
Evaluation System (MES) software, version 3.1.13 (Tedeschi, 2006), 0.0013) of the linear relationship between RE and CG. Therefore,
and the significance established was 0.05. The predicted and observed Eqns (10)–(12) were adjusted for intact males, castrated males,
values were compared using the following regression model: and females, respectively. For the RE models, the variance-
covariance structure selected was Toeplitz.
Y = b0 + b1 × X (6) Intact males:RE = 1.448 (+0.0657) × EBW 0.75
× CG0.797 (+0.0399) (10)
where Y represents the observed values; X represents the predicted
values; and β0 and β1 correspond to the intercept and slope of the
regression, respectively. The regression was evaluated according to
the following statistical hypotheses (Neter et al., 1996): H0: β0 = 0 Castrated males:RE = 1.522(+0.0699) × EBW 0.75
and β1 = 1; Ha: rejection of H0. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, × CG0.797 (+0.0399) (11)
it is concluded that the tested equation estimates precisely and accur-
ately. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used as an indicator
of precision, with values closer to 1 being better. The correlation and Females:RE = 1.827 (+0.0739) × EBW 0.75 × CG0.797 (+0.0399)
concordance coefficient (CCC) or reproducibility index, was used to
evaluate the model in terms of prediction efficiency (Deyo et al., R2 = 0.784; MSE = 0.005; AIC = −411.7
1991; Nickerson, 1997; Liao, 2003) and varies from –1 to +1, with (12)
values closer to +1 being better. The models’ prediction errors
were evaluated using the estimated mean squared error of prediction where RE is the retained energy (MJ/day); EBW0.75 is metabolic
(MSEP; the closer to 0 the better), and its components (squared bias, empty body weight (kg); and CG is the carcass gain (kg/day).
Table 4. Statistical validation of the relationship between predicted and observed values of carcass weight, empty body weight, empty body weight gain, and
retained energy
Average (kg) 13.75 14.28 24.62 24.11 0.118 0.122 1.596 1.649
Standard deviation (kg) 2.59 2.43 4.52 4.39 0.031 0.027 0.573 0.497
Maximum (kg) 21.90 21.60 39.40 38.20 0.182 0.179 3.182 3.179
Minimum (kg) 7.70 8.80 14.40 14.20 0.056 0.077 0.492 0.828
R 2
– 0.912 – 0.958 – 0.820 – 0.600
CCC – 0.933 – 0.972 – 0.889 – 0.763
Intercept
Estimate – −0.737 – 0.332 – −0.008 – 0.125
Standard deviation – 0.585 – 0.715 – 0.008 – 0.161
P-value (H0: β0 = 0) – 0.213 – 0.644 – 0.281 – 0.440
Slope
Estimate – 1.01 – 1.01 – 1.04 – 0.893
Standard deviation – 0.040 – 0.029 – 0.062 – 0.093
P-value (H0: β1 = 1) – 0.717 – 0.803 – 0.550 – 0.254
MSEP – 0.859 – 1.10 – 0.00018 – 0.135
SB – 0.277 – 0.259 – 0.00002 – 0.003
MaF – 0.001 – 0.001 – 0.00000 – 0.003
MoF – 0.581 – 0.840 – 0.00017 – 0.129
RMSEP – 0.927 – 1.05 – 0.013 – 0.367
2
CW, carcass weight; EBW, empty body weight; EBWG, empty body weight gain; RE, retained energy; R , determination coefficient; CCC, correlation and concordance coefficient; MSEP, mean
squared error of prediction; SB, square bias; MaF, systematic bias; MoF, random errors; RMSEP, root mean squared error of prediction.
The validation analysis of Eqns (10)–(12) showed that RE can to representing the tissues accumulated during growth (Benedeti
be accurately estimated from CG (Table 4), as the intercept (P = et al., 2021). Chay-Canul et al. (2014) proposed an equation to
0.440) and slope (P = 0.254) were not different from 0 and 1, predict EBW as a function of CW for Pelibuey sheep. However,
respectively (Fig. 1). In validating the RE prediction equations, for hair sheep, equations have not yet been generated from CW
an R2 of 0.600, CCC of 0.763 and MSEP of 0.135 were observed. data, based on studies with different breeds and sex classes raised
in tropical conditions. Much information related to BW, EBW,
FBW and CW of hair sheep has been generated in recent years.
Discussion
Our study highlights the advantage of using CW or CG as vari-
Several feeding systems use models to predict the performance ables to predict EBW, EBWG, and RE, because CW and/or CG
and nutritional needs of ruminants based on information esti- are practical variables, due to the simplicity of quantifying and
mated based on EBW (Cannas et al., 2004; Oliveira et al., 2018; calculating.
Herbster et al., 2024). The EBW exactly represents the animal The adjusted equation for predicting CW from FBW was not
mass (Salazar-Cuytun et al., 2022), and corresponds to the most affected by sex class. Greater carcass yields were reported for
precise measurement to express nutritional requirements females due to early fat deposition compared to males (Osório
(Owens et al., 1995; Costa et al., 2013). The empty BW has et al., 1999). However, heavier carcasses are expected for intact
been estimated as a function of BW (ARC, 1980), FBW males due to the greater potential for muscle growth (Hegarty
(Herbster et al., 2020; Salazar-Cuytun et al., 2022), and CW et al., 2006). The effect of sex on carcass weight and composition
(Owens et al., 1995). However, the difficulty of obtaining EBW is well reported, but Prache et al. (2022) explained that this effect
has been reported (Owens et al., 1995; Chay-Canul et al., 2014; depends on age, which justifies obtaining a general equation for
Herbster et al., 2020; Benedeti et al., 2021), due to the laborious predicting CW. The Eqn (7) has been validated, which indicated
procedures of evisceration, emptying of gastric compartments, that it adequately predicts the CW of hair sheep. The high values
washing, draining and weighing. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate of R2 (0.912) and CCC (0.933), and the low MSEP (0.859) verified
alternative measures to predict this variable, since EBW cannot be in the validation indicate good reproducibility and precision of
used for much longer. the proposed equation. Furthermore, the MSEP partitioning
The CW was used to predict EBW in cattle (Garrett and demonstrated low proportion of SB and MaF, which indicates a
Hinman, 1969; Fox et al., 1976), due to the advantage of being lower of prediction error associated with the model. Using Eqn.
a variable commonly measured in the slaughter line, in addition (7) and considering sheep with FBW of 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg,
Figure 1. Relationships of observed and residual (observed – predicted) values with predicted values of carcass weight (CW; A), empty body weight (EBW; B), empty
body weight gain (EBWG; C), and retained energy (RE; D). The points in the graphs originate from the validation data set, with the points in A and B corresponding
to the compilation of treatment averages reported by independent publications; and in C and D, corresponding to individual information originating from inde-
pendent studies data sets.
the CW is estimated at 4.62, 9.48, 14.34 and 19.20 kg, with a car- The EBWG is generally predicted to be a function of ADG
cass yield equivalent to 46.2; 47.4; 47.8 and 48.0%, respectively. (Cannas et al., 2004; Herbster et al., 2024). For hair sheep,
These values are consistent with the yields commonly found for Herbster et al. (2020) proposed that the EBWG is equivalent to
hair sheep (Souza et al., 2013; Queiroz et al., 2015; Nascimento 91% of the ADG. The use of carcass information to predict
et al., 2018), which range from 44 to 50%. EBW and EBWG is an interesting alternative since obtaining
In our study, sex class did not affect the EBW estimate as a func- EBW is a laborious measure in the experimental trials. In add-
tion of CW. This can be explained by the young age of the sheep in ition, CG is composed only of retained tissues and can be calcu-
this study. In addition, greater differences in body composition lated from a variable routinely measured in slaughterhouses. The
generally occur closer to maturity, due to the effects of the hor- accretion of carcass protein and fat as the sheep grows depends on
mone’s testosterone and oestrogen, which modulate tissue depos- adult BW which varies with genotype, sex class and birth weight
ition (Herbster et al., 2023). The validation analysis demonstrated (Prache et al., 2022).
that the CW predictor variable adequately estimates EBW (Eqn In our study, the intercept of the RE prediction equation as a
(8); R2 = 0.958). The CCC was close to 1 (0.972), which indicated function of CG was influenced by sex class. The RE is equivalent
good reproducibility, and the MSEP was 1.10, with 76% associated to the heat of combustion of the protein and fat deposited in the
with the MoF, that is, error associated with random fluctuation of gain (ARC, 1980). The composition of the gain is markedly
the data, which suggests that Eqn (8) has good predictive ability. affected by sex class (Pereira et al., 2018a; Herbster et al., 2024)
For example, considering CW of sheep with 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg, so females have more fat in the gain and less protein than
we obtain a EBW of 9.77, 18.18, 26.59 and 34.99 kg, respectively. castrated males, which deposit more fat and less protein in the
gain compared to intact males (Greenhalgh, 1986). The anabolic committee on animal use was not necessary for this study because the data
effect of testosterone in intact males reduces protein catabolism in were collected from previously published sources.
muscles and intensifies the proliferation of satellite cells (Paulino
et al., 2009), which causes them to deposit more protein in the
gain compared to castrated males. In this way, castrated males References
are deprived of the anabolic potential of protein synthesis and
Agricultural Research Council (ARC) (1980) The Nutrient Requirements of
advance more quickly for maturity (Herbster et al., 2024). Body
Ruminant Livestock. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
fat is the item that varies the most, while fat-free dry mass is Alvarenga FAP (2013) Terminação de cordeiros sob pastejo com teores cres-
quite constant since the main change in body composition that centes de proteína (MS thesis). Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas
occurs with animal growth and development is the increase in Gerais, Brazil.
fat content and this mechanism represents the degree of maturity Araújo TL, Pereira ES, Mizubuti IY, Campos AC, Pereira MW, Heinzen EL,
of the animal (NRC, 2007). Females’ hair sheep initiate fat depos- Magalhães HCR, Bezerra LR, Silva LP and Oliveira RL (2017) Effects of quan-
ition more quickly when compared to males (Pereira et al., titative feed restriction and sex on carcass traits, meat quality and meat lipid pro-
2018a), which is associated with preparation for reproductive file of Morada Nova lambs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 8, 1–12.
activity (Wade and Schneider, 1992). Therefore, for the same Araújo Filho JTD, Costa RG, Fraga AB, Sousa WHD, Cezar MF and
EBW and CG, energy retention will be greater in females, lower Batista ASM (2010) Desempenho e composição da carcaça de cordeiros
deslanados terminados em confinamento com diferentes dietas. Revista
in intact males and intermediate in castrated males. These physio-
Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 363–371.
logical events clarify the effect of sex on the equations developed Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (AOAC) (1990) Official
to predict RE. Methods of Analysis, 15th Edn. Washington, DC: AOAC.
The RE prediction equations (Eqns (10)–(12)) were validated Bastos MPV, Carvalho GGP, Pires AJV, Silva RR, Carvalho BMA,
and found to be accurate in prediction ability (CCC = 0.763; Brandão RKC and Maranhão CMA (2015) Impact of total substitution
MSEP = 0.135). The MSEP decomposition demonstrated that of corn for soybean hulls in diets for lambs. Revista Brasileira de
96% of the errors associated with the estimate are random Zootecnia 44, 83–91.
(Mof), which highlights the precision of the generated equations. Benedeti PDB, Valadares Filho SC, Chizzotti ML, Marcondes MI and
Considering a sheep with a EBW of 25 kg and CG of 0.100 kg, Silva FAS (2021) Development of equations to predict carcass weight,
intact males, castrated males and females have RE estimated at empty body gain, and retained energy of Zebu beef cattle. Animal: An
International Journal of Animal Bioscience 15, 100028.
2.58, 2.71 and 3.26 MJ/day, respectively.
Bibby J and Toutenburg H (1977) Prediction and Improved Estimation in
Linear Models, 1st Edn. Berlin: John Wiley & Sons.
BR-CORTE (2023) Exigências Nutricionais de Zebuínos Puros e Cruzados, 4th
Conclusion Edn. Visconde do Rio Branco, MG: Suprema Gráfica Ltda.
Brito Neto AS (2020) Avaliação bioeconômica do confinamento de borregos
This study highlights the importance of incorporating carcass Santa Inês abatidos em diferentes pesos (MS thesis). Federal University of
information into EBW, EBWG, and RE predictions. Replacing Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
empty body weight gain with carcass gain might be a suitable Cannas A, Tedeschi LO, Fox DG, Pell AN and Van Soest PJ (2004) A mech-
alternative to estimate the retained energy of hair sheep. In add- anistic model for predicting the nutrient requirements and feed biological
ition, the generated equations will provide support for meat pro- values for sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 149–169.
duction systems in carcass weight prediction. Chay-Canul AJ, Espinoza-Hernandez JC, Ayala-Burgos AJ,
Magaña-Monforte JG, Aguilar-Perez CF, Chizzotti ML, Tedeschi LO
Supplementary material. The supplementary material for this article can and Ku-Vera JC (2014) Relationship of empty body weight with shrunken
be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859624000455. body weight and carcass weights in adult Pelibuey ewes at different physio-
logical states. Small Ruminant Research 117, 10–14.
Acknowledgements. The authors thank the grants provided by Conselho Cook RD and Weisberg S (1982) Residuals and Influence in Regression.
Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq, New York, USA: Chapman and Hall.
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES Costa RG, Lima CAC, Medeiros AN, Lima GDC, Marques CAT and
and Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia INCT- Ciência Animal Santos ND (2011) Características de carcaça de cordeiros Morada Nova ali-
and Cadeia Produtiva da Carne. mentados com diferentes níveis do fruto-refugo de melão em substituição
ao milho moído na dieta. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 866–871.
Authors’ contributions. Conceptualization, EP; methodology, EP and MM;
Costa MRGF, Pereira ES, Silva AMA, Paulino PVR, Mizubuti IY,
formal analysis, AB, CH, MM and JC; investigation, AB and CH; data curation,
Pimentel PG, Pinto AP and Rocha Junior JN (2013) Body composition
EP, MM, JC, RO, LB and LS; writing – original draft preparation, EP, AB and and net energy and protein requirements of Morada Nova lambs. Small
CH; review and editing, EP, AB, CH, RO, LB and LS; supervision, EP; project
Ruminant Research 114, 206–213.
administration, EP. All authors have read and agreed to the published version Cunha MGG, Carvalho FFR, Gonzaga Neto S and Cezar MF (2008)
of the manuscript.
Características quantitativas de carcaça de ovinos Santa Inês confinados ali-
mentados com rações contendo diferentes níveis de caroço de algodão inte-
Funding statement. This research received no specific grant from any fund-
gral. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 1112–1120.
ing agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Dantas AF, Pereira Filho JM, Silva AMA, Santos EM, Sousa BB and
Competing interests. None. Cézar MF (2008) Características da carcaça de ovinos Santa Inês termina-
dos em pastejo e submetidos a diferentes níveis de suplementação. Ciência e
Ethical standards. Studies of C.J.L. Herbster (unpublished) and A.S Brito Agrotecnologia 32, 1280–1286.
Neto (unpublished) were conducted according to the procedures established Deyo RA, Diehr P and Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness
by the Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais (CEUA) of the Federal of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled
University of Ceara (protocol 3381260719). The study of A.C. Rocha (unpub- Clinical Trials 12, 142S–1158.
lished) was conducted according to the procedures established by the Comitê Fernandes Júnior F, Ribeiro ELA, Mizubuti IY, Silva LDF, Barbosa MAAF,
de Ética no Uso de Animais de Produção (CEUAP) of the Federal University Prado OPP, Pereira ES, Pimentel PG and Constantino C (2013)
of Ceara (protocol 1502202201). For other studies, the approval of the ethics Características de carcaça e qualidade da carne de cordeiros Santa Inês
alimentados com torta de girassol em substituição ao farelo de algodão. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ and Wasserman W (1996) Applied Linear
Semina: Ciências Agrárias 34, 3999–4014. Statistical Models, 4th Edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
Fox DG, Dockerty TR, Johnson RR and Preston RL (1976) Relationship of Nickerson CA (1997) A note on “A concordance correlation coefficient to
empty body weight to carcass weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animal evaluate reproducibility”. Biometrics 53, 1503–1507.
Science 43, 566–568. Oliveira AP, Pereira ES, Pinto AP, Silva ADA, Carneiro MDS, Mizubuti IY,
Garrett WN and Hinman N (1969) Re-evaluation of the relationship between Ribeiro ELA, Campos ACN and Gadelha CRF (2014) Estimates of
carcass density and body composition of beef steers. Journal of Animal nutritional requirements and use of Small Ruminant Nutrition System
Science 28, 1–5. model for hair sheep in semiarid conditions. Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Gois GC, Santos EM, Sousa WH, Ramos JPF, Azevedo PS, Oliveira JS, 35, 1985–1997.
Pereira GA and Perazzo AF (2017) Qualidade da carne de ovinos terminados Oliveira JPF, Ferreira MA, Freitas APD, Urbano SA and Silva ÁEM (2017)
em confinamento com dietas com silagens de diferentes cultivares de sorgo. Características de carcaça de ovinos Santa Inês alimentados com mazoferm
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 69, 1653–1659. substituindo o farelo de soja. Revista Ciência Agronômica 48, 708–715.
Greenhalgh JFD (1986) Recent studies on the body composition of ruminants. Oliveira AP, Pereira ES, Biffani S, Medeiros AN, Silva AMA, Oliveira RL
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 119–130. and Marcondes MI (2018) Meta-analysis of the energy and protein require-
Hegarty RS, Warner RD and Pethick DW (2006) Genetic and nutritional ments of hair sheep raised in the tropical region of Brazil. Journal of Animal
regulation of lamb growth and muscle characteristics. Australian Journal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 102, e52–e60.
of Agricultural Research 57, 721–730. Osório MTM, Sierra I, Sañudo C and Osório JC (1999) The influence of
Herbster CJL, Silva LP, Marcondes MI, Garcia IFF, Oliveira RL, Cabral LS, breed, sex and weight/age on carcass yield in lambs. Ciência Rural 29,
Souza JG and Pereira ES (2020) Weight adjustment equation for hair sheep 139–142.
raised in warm conditions. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS and Coleman SW (1995) Review of some
Bioscience 14, 1718–1723. aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal
Herbster CJL, Abreu MLC, Brito Neto AS, Mendes MS, Silva LP, Science 73, 3152–3172.
Marcondes MI, Mazza PHS, Cabral LS, Bezerra LR, Oliveira RL and Paulino PVR, Valadares Filho SDC, Detmann E, Valadares RFD,
Pereira ES (2023) Macromineral requirements for maintenance and growth Fonseca MA and Marcondes MI (2009) Deposição de tecidos e compo-
in male and female hair sheep. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10, 1032429. nentes químicos corporais em bovinos Nelore de diferentes classes sexuais.
Herbster CJL, Oliveira AP, Brito Neto AS, Justino ES, Teixeira IAMA, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 2516–2524.
Azevedo JAG, Santos SA, Silva LP, Marcondes MI, Oliveira RL, Pell RJ (2000) Multiple outlier detection for multivariate calibration using
Bezerra LR and Pereira ES (2024) Understanding the effect of sex on robust statistical techniques. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory
energy requirements of hair sheep. Animal: An International Journal of Systems 52, 87–104.
Animal Bioscience 18, 101071. Pereira GM (2011) Exigências de proteína e energia de carneiros Santa Inês na
Liao JJZ (2003) An improved concordance correlation coefficient. região semiárida brasileira (MS thesis). Federal University of Campina
Pharmaceutical Statistics 2, 253–261. Grande, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil.
Lima Júnior DM, Carvalho FFR, Batista ÂMV, Ferreira BF and Ribeiro MN Pereira ES, Fontenele RM, Silva AMA, Oliveira RL, Ferreira MRG,
(2015) Componentes do peso corporal de ovinos morada nova alimentados Mizubuti IY, Carneiro MSS and Campos ACN (2014) Body composition
com feno de maniçoba ou feno de Tifton. Revista Caatinga 28, 239–246. and net energy requirements of Brazilian Somali lambs. Italian Journal of
McManus CM, Faria DA, Lucci CM, Louvandini H, Pereira SA and Animal Science 13, 3583.
Paiva SR (2020) Heat stress effects on sheep: are hair sheep more heat Pereira ES, Lima FWR, Marcondes MI, Rodrigues JPP, Campos ACN,
resistant? Theriogenology 155, 157–167. Silva LP, Bezerra LR, Pereira MWF and Oliveira RL (2017) Energy and
Medeiros GR, Carvalho FFR, Batista ÂMV, Dutra Júnior WM, Santos GRA protein requirements of Santa Ines lambs, a breed of hair sheep. Animal:
and Andrade DKB (2009) Efeito dos níveis de concentrado sobre as An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 11, 2165–2174.
características de carcaça de ovinos Morada Nova em confinamento. Pereira ES, Pimentel PG, Fontenele RM, Medeiros AN, Regadas Filho JGL
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 718–727. and Villarroel ABS (2010) Características e rendimentos de carcaça e de
Mendes MS, Souza JG, Herbster CJL, Brito Neto AS, Silva LP, cortes em ovinos Santa Inês, alimentados com diferentes concentrações
Rodrigues JPP, Marcondes MI, Oliveira RL, Bezerra LR and Pereira ES de energia metabolizável. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 32, 431–437.
(2021) Maintenance and growth requirements in male Dorper × Santa Pereira ES, Pereira MWF, Marcondes MI, Medeiros AN, Oliveira RL,
Ines lambs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8, 574. Silva LP, Mizubuti IY, Campos ACN, Heinzen EL, Veras ASC,
Menezes LFO, Louvandini H, Martha Júnior GB, McManus C, Garcia JAS Bezerra LR and Araújo TLAC (2018a) Maintenance and growth require-
and Murata LS (2008) Características de carcaça, componentes não-carcaça ments in male and female hair lambs. Small Ruminant Research 159, 75–83.
e composição tecidual e química da 12ª costela de cordeiros Santa Inês ter- Pereira GA, Oliveira JS, Santos EM, Carvalho GGP, Araújo GGL,
minados em pasto com três gramíneas no período seco. Revista Brasileira de Sousa WH, Homem Neto SP and Cartaxo FQ (2018b) Substitution of soy-
Zootecnia 37, 1286–1292. bean meal for urea in diets based on deferred buffelgrass hay for feedlot
Meyer JH, Lofgreen GP and Gareett WN (1960) A proposed method for sheep. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 47, e20170035.
removing sources of error in beef cattle feeding experiments. Journal of Prache S, Schreurs N and Guillier L (2022) Factors affecting sheep carcass
Animal Science 19, 1123–1131. and meat quality attributes. Animal: An International Journal of Animal
Nascimento UFS, Santos GRA, Azevedo CS, Macedo FAF, Gonçalves TR, Bioscience 16, 100330.
Bomfim LELM, Farias JS and Santos ADF (2018) Performance and car- Queiroz LO, Santos GRA, Macêdo FAF, Mora NHAP, Torres MG,
cass characteristics of lambs ½ Dorper +½ Santa Inês, slaughtered with dif- Santana TEZ and Macêdo FG (2015) Características quantitativas da
ferent thicknesses of subcutaneous fat. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e carcaça de cordeiros Santa Inês, abatidos com diferentes espessuras de gor-
Produção Animal 19, 125–135. dura subcutânea. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 16,
Nascimento Junior NG (2010) Desempenho, características de carcaça e 712–722.
exigências nutricionais de proteína e energia para ganho de cordeiros Regadas Filho JGL, Pereira ES, Pimentel PG, Villarroel ABS, Medeiros AN
Santa Inês e ½ Dorper x ½ Santa Inês em pastejo na região semiárida and Fontenele RM (2013) Body composition and net energy requirements
(PhD thesis). Federal University of Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil (2010). for Santa Ines lambs. Small Ruminant Research 109, 107–112.
National Research Council (NRC) (1984) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Rocha AC (2022) Farelo de mamona industrialmente destoxificado como
Cattle, 6th Edn. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press. fonte proteica na dieta de ovinos (MS thesis). Federal University of
National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Nutrient Requirements of Small Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids and New World Camelids. Washington, Rodrigues RTS, Chizzotti ML, Martins SR, Silva IF, Queiroz MAÁ,
DC, USA: National Academies Press. Silva TS, Busato KC and Silva AMA (2016) Energy and protein
requirements of non-descript breed hair lambs of different sex classes in the lambs produced from Dorper sheep crossed with Santa Inês or Brazilian
semiarid region of Brazil. Tropical Animal Health and Production 48, Somali sheep. Small Ruminant Research 114, 51–55.
87–94. St-Pierre NR (2001) Invited review: integrating quantitative findings from
Salazar-Cuytun EDR, Pool-Yanez GE, Portillo-Salgado R, Antonio-Molina multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy
G, Garcia-Herrera RA, Camacho-Perez E, Zaragoza-Vera CV, Science 84, 741–755.
Vargas-Bello-Pérez E and Chay-Canul AJ (2022) Evaluation of models Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models.
to estimate empty body weight in hair sheep raised in a feedlot system. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 25, 1–7. Tedeschi LO (2023) Harnessing extant energy and protein requirements mod-
Silva AMA, Santos EMD, Pereira Filho JM, Bakke OA, Gonzaga Neto S elling for sustainable beef production. Animal: An International Journal of
and Costa RGD (2010) Body composition and nutritional require- Animal Bioscience 17, 100835.
ments of protein and energy for body weight gain of lambs browsing Urbano SA, Ferreira MA, Véras RML, Azevedo PS, Santos Filho HB,
in a tropical semiarid region. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, Vasconcelos GA and Oliveira JPF (2015) Características de carcaça e
210–216. composição tecidual de ovinos Santa Inês alimentados com manipueira.
Silva RVMM, Carvalho GGP, Pires AJV, Pereira MLA, Pereira L, Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 10, 466–472.
Campos FS, Perazzo AF, Araújo MLGML, Nascimento CO, Santos AS, Vieira MMM, Cândido MJD, Bomfim MAD, Severino LS, Zapata JFF,
Tosto MSL, Rufino LMA and Carvalho BMA (2016) Cottonseed cake in Beserra LT, Meneses AJG and Fernandes JPB (2010) Características da
substitution of soybean meal in diets for finishing lambs. Small Ruminant carcaça e dos componentes não-carcaça em ovinos alimentados com
Research 137, 183–188. rações à base de farelo de mamona. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e
Silva KB, Oliveira JS, Santos EM, Ramos JPF, Cartaxo FQ, Givisiez PEN, Produção Animal 11, 140–149.
Souza AFN, Cruz GFL, Cézar Neto JM, Alves JP, Ferreira DJ, Wade GN and Schneider JE (1992) Metabolic fuels and reproduction in
Lima AGVO and Zanine AM (2021) Cactus pear as roughage source feed- female mammals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 16, 235–272.
ing confined lambs: performance, carcass characteristics, and economic Xenofonte ARB, Carvalho FFR, Batista ÂMV and Medeiros GR (2009)
analysis. Agronomy 11, 625. Características de carcaça de ovinos em crescimento alimentados com
Souza DA, Selaive-Villarroel AB, Pereira ES, Osório JCS and Teixeira A rações contendo farelo de babaçu. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38,
(2013) Growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of 392–398.