IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, S.A.S.
NAGAR
(MOHALI) (EXERCISING THE POWER OF SPECIAL COURT, UNDER
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003)
PETITION No_____/2024
Mr. Lakha Singh aged ______ S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab. … Petitioner
Vs.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Authorized
representative
Respondent
PETITION UNDER SECTION 154(5) OF
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2023 WITH
THE PRAYER THAT THIS HON’BLE
COURT MAY KINDLY PLEASE SET
ASIDE THE LETTER 7421 DATED
11.11.2022/- FOR ILLEGAL DEMAND
IN RESPECT OF SUNDRY CHARGES
AND ANY SUBSEQUENT
PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE
SAID LETTER.
AND
FURTHER SETTING ASIDE THE
ILLEGAL DEMAND RAISED BY THE
RESPONDENT IN THE FORM OF
SUNDRY CHARGES VIDE BILL NO.
500097386303 DATED 23.04.2022
AND THROUGH SUBSEQUENT BILLS.
AND
FURTHER TO ADJUST THE AMOUNT
OF RS.1,00,000/- (ONE LAKH ONLY)
PAID BY THE PETITIONER ON DATED
17TH OCT,2022 IN RESPECT OF THE
CONSUMPTION OF THE ELECTRICITY
UNITS.
AND
ANY OTHER RELIEF WHICH THE
HON’BLE COURT DEEM FIT.
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
1. That the petitioner is law abiding senior citizen who is resident of the
said address since 7-8 years and retired from Government bank.
2. That the petitioner is regularly paying his electricity city Bills from the
date he is residing at the above-mentioned house and for the perusal
of this Hon’ble court the petitioner had attached the copy of bill issued
by the respondent in the month of Jan2022, March, 2022, June, 2022,
August, 2022 and October 2022, March 2023, April 2023, August 2023
and December 2023 and the same was paid by the petitioner every
time. Copy of the Bills and the payment made is annexed here as
Annexure P-1 to P-9.
3. That the petitioner on multiple occasion had intimated the authorized
person who used to come for taking the electricity reading in respect
of slow/not proper working of the electricity meter which is installed in
the LT- Panel which is placed at the ground floor of the society and the
entire installation of the wires are underground in the said society.
4. That it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner who is a senior
citizen is residing in a society where the electricity meters are installed
in the LT- Panel by the society/department and there is no possibility
of tempering of such meter by the petitioner.
5. That it was a shock for the petitioner when the petitioner received a
Bill No 500097386303 dated 23.04.2022, in which it was clearly
mentioned that the New Readings are 7786 and old reading is 6952
and total consumption is 834 and also shows the previous arrears of
Rs. 29,855/- whereas the petitioner was regularly paying his monthly
electricity bills to the respondent .Copy of the Bill dated 23.04.2022 is
annexed here as Annexure P-10.
6. That the petitioner immediately in the month of April,2022 made
multiple visits and requested the authorities to rectify the bill as they
have issued a hefty amount vide bill dated 23.04.2022. That finding no
way out the petitioner made a written request to the SDO, PSPCL,
ZIRAKPUR and intimated the respondent for the issuance of the wrong
bill by them. But no revert was made by the respondent. Copy of the
written letter dated 11.05.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-11.
7. That again in the month of June, 2022 the petitioner gave a reminder
in respect of the written Petition submitted by the petitioner as on date
no revert has been received by the petitioner from the respondent.
Copy of the reminder letter dated 09.06.2022 along with the postal
recipient is annexed here as Annexure P-12.
8. That it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner has also filed
one RTI application seeking information in respect of the sundry
charges levied by the respondent on the petitioner. Copy of the RTI
application dated 25.07.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-13,
but as on date no reply had been received as the same has to be given
the department of the respondent.
9. That it is pertinent to mention here that in the month of October,2022
the petitioner again made an letter dated 18.10.2022 to the Executive
Engineer, PSPCL in which he has mentioned about the detail
communication made between the petitioner and the respondent,
further it is important to mention here that the petitioner has also
imitated in respect of the deceiving acts done by the respondent by
misusing their power and trying to grab money from the petitioner.
Copy of the letter dated 18.10.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-
14.
10. That further it was a shock for the petitioner to see letter No
7421 dated 11.11.2022 in which the respondent levied false allegation
of electricity thief on the petitioner and furthermore, raised an
exorbitant demand of Rs. 84,786/- which needs to be paid by the
petitioner to the respondent. Copy of the letter dated 11.11.2022 is
annexed here as Annexure P-15.
11. That it is pertinent to mention that no such raid was conducted
by the enforcement team as mentioned in the letter dated 11.11.2022
issued by the respondent. Furthermore, the respondent had
concocted a false and baseless story to coverup the lacuna and to trap
the complainant and fetch unjustified and unreasonable amount.
It is pertinent to mention that no such raid was conducted by the
enforcement team as mentioned in the letter issued by the
respondent. Furthermore, the respondent had concocted a false and
baseless story to coverup the lacuna and to trap the complainant and
fetch unjustified and unreasonable amount.
12. That the Petitioner was in deep stress as the petitioner is a
respectful citizen and further is a member of RWA in the society he
residing the respondent levied false allegation of electricity thief
without any proof. In this respect the petitioner approached the higher
authorities in order to get the clarification in respect of the above
mention letter dated 11.11.2022. The petitioner got no response to his
reverses instead he was threatened that in case he does not pay the
amount mentioned in the letter dated 11.11.2022 his electricity
connection will be disconnected.
13. That the petitioner was having no other option but to fulfill the
unjustified and illegal demand of the respondent. The petitioner made
a payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on 17.10.2022 in
two transactions through internet banking vide internet banking no.
910968931 and 910969479 of Rs. 50,000/- each.
14. That it is pertinent to mention here that as per Punjab state
electricity Supply code amended up to 7 th Amendment as per the
provision of the code the respondent needs to comply with the
procedure to justify the allegation levied by them but no such
procedure was ever done by the respondent and they have wrongfully
and intentionally showing their monopoly wrongfully levied allegation
against the petitioner and raised illegitimate demands in the form of
sundry charges. For the perusal of this Hon’ble court 37.1 of the
Electricity Supply code is mentioned below :-
37.1 Procedure in a case of Theft of Electricity
37.1.1 An Authorized Officer, designated by the Govt. of Punjab under Section 135 of
the Act (Annexure-11) may enter, inspect, break open and search any place or premises
as per section 135(2) of the Act in which he has reason to believe or has been intimated
by an Assessing Officer under Regulation 36.1.5 that theft of electricity has occurred or
is occurring.
37.1.2 The Authorized Officer and other members of his team shall, at the time of
inspection carry identity cards, which shall on demand be shown to the consumer/
person present at site before entering the place/premises. Provided that no inspection,
search and seizure of any domestic places or premises shall be carried out between
sunset and sunrise except in the presence of an adult male member occupying such
premises.
37.1.3 Inspection Report
The Authorized Officer shall prepare an inspection report inter alia indicating
connected load, status of meter/metering equipment, condition of meter & seals
and any other irregularity noticed (such as means adopted for theft of electricity) in
such premises.
37.1.4 The Authorized Officer shall record evidence substantiating theft of electricity in the
premises and shall, wherever possible, photograph/ video graph the means of theft
of electricity with a camera having facility for recording date and time of event.
Where the theft of electricity is done through a tampered meter, such meter shall be
confiscated. No case for theft shall be booked merely on account of seals on the
meter missing or tampered or breakage of window glass unless dishonest
abstraction of electricity through these means is corroborated by consumption
pattern of the consumer and such other evidence as may be available.
37.1.5 The occupant of the place of search or any person on his behalf shall remain present
during the search and a list of all items seized in the course of such search shall be
prepared and delivered to such occupant or person who shall sign the list.
37.1.6 The Authorized Officer shall sign the inspection report and also obtain the signature
of the person/occupant present during the search and seizure. A copy of the
inspection report and seizure memo shall be handed over to the occupant/person
present at the premises during the search. In case of refusal to receive the
inspection report, a copy of the same shall be pasted at a conspicuous place
in/outside the premises and another copy sent to the consumer/ person under
registered post. In the case of suspected theft of electricity, the inspection report
shall indicate the time in which the occupant/person may respond to the said report
before the Authorized Officer gives his findings in accordance with Regulation
37.1.7(b).
37.1.7 Suspected case of Theft of Electricity:
(a) In case where a consumer is suspected to have indulged/indulging in theft of electricity
by tampering with the meter/metering equipment and/or its seals or otherwise then
such equipment shall be sealed by the Authorized Officer so as to keep it in ‘as found
condition’. However, the supply of such consumer shall continue with the newmeter.
The consumer or his representative shall also be permitted to affix his seal at that time.
(b) In all cases of suspected theft of electricity falling under Regulation 37.1.7 (a), the
Authorized Officer shall, after giving the consumer/person an opportunity of being
heard, determine within seven (7) days whether or not there is sufficient evidence to
conclude that a case of theft of electricity is prima facie established as per Section 135
of the Act.
(c) In case of suspected theft of electricity by tampering with meter/metering equipment
or its seals or otherwise, detected as per Regulation 37.1.7 (a) is not established, the
Authorized Officer shall record reasons thereof after which all further proceedings shall
be dropped and the consumer/person informed accordingly.
(d) In the event a suspected case of theft of electricity by tampering with meter/metering
equipment or its seals or otherwise is prima facie established as per Section 135 of the
Act, then further action shall be immediately initiated in accordance with Regulation
37.2.
No such procedure was followed by the respondent as on date
which is leading to unfair trade practice and deficiency of service.
12. That it is pertinent to mention here that the respondent
uninstalled the meter without any intimation further neither any report
in respect of the allegation levied by the respondent against the
petitioner nor any report has been signed by petitioner nor has been
given to the petitioner
13. That the petitioner made multiple requests to the respondent in
respect of the wrongful demand made by them but all that lead to no
veil.
14. That it is pertinent to mention here that this Hon’ble court had
the territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction as the petitioner is the
permanent resident of Zirakpur, Mohali, and Punjab.
15. That the petitioner had not filed any other similar complaint
before any court of law other than CC/141/2023 titled as Lakha Singh
Vs.Punjab State Power Corporation Limited which was dismissed
because of the reason that Hon’ble commission was not having
jurisdiction to deal with the present case. Copy of the order dated
21.08.2023 is annexed here as Annexure P-11.
It is therefore respectfully prayed that
1. To set aside the letter 7421 dated 11.11.2022/- for illegal demand in
respect of sundry charges and any subsequent proceedings in respect of
the said letter.
2. To setting aside the illegal demand raised by the respondent in the form
of sundry charges vide bill no. 500097386303 dated 23.04.2022 and
through subsequent bills.
3. To adjust the amount of rs.1,00,000/- (one lakh only) paid by the
petitioner on dated 17th oct,2022 in respect of the consumption of the
electricity units.
4. Any other relief which the Hon’ble court deem fit.
Petitioner
Place :- Mohali
Dated :- Through Counsel
(Sharad Gautam And Jasdeep Singh )
Advocates
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, S.A.S. NAGAR
(MOHALI) (EXERCISING THE POWER OF SPECIAL COURT, UNDER THE
ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003)
Mr. Lakha Singh aged _____ S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab. …
Petitioner
Vs.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Authorized
representative
…Respondent
Affidavit of Mr. Lakha Singh aged _____
S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-
M, Maya Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur,
Punjab.
I, the above named deponent, do hereby solemnly affirm and states as
under:
1. That the petitioner is law abiding senior citizen who is resident of the
said address since 7-8 years and retired from Government bank.
2. That the petitioner is regularly paying his electricity city Bills from the
date he is residing at the above mentioned house and for the perusal
of this Hon’ble court the petitioner had attached the copy of bill issued
by the respondent in the month of Jan2022, March, 2022, June, 2022,
August, 2022 and October 2022, March 2023, April 2023, August 2023
and December 2023 and the same was paid by the petitioner every
time. Copy of the Bills and the payment made is annexed here as
Annexure P-1 to P-9.
3. That the petitioner on multiple occasion had intimated the authorized
person who used to come for taking the electricity reading in respect
of slow/not proper working of the electricity meter which is installed in
the LT- Panel which is placed at the ground floor of the society and the
entire installation of the wires are underground in the said society.
4. That it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner who is a senior
citizen is residing in a society where the electricity meters are installed
in the LT- Panel by the society/department and there is no possibility
of tempering of such meter by the petitioner.
5. That it was a shock for the petitioner when the petitioner received a
Bill No 500097386303 dated 23.04.2022, in which it was clearly
mentioned that the New Readings are 7786 and old reading is 6952
and total consumption is 834 and also shows the previous arrears of
Rs. 29,855/- whereas the petitioner was regularly paying his monthly
electricity bills to the respondent .Copy of the Bill dated 23.04.2022 is
annexed here as Annexure P-10.
6. That the petitioner immediately in the month of April,2022 made
multiple visits and requested the authorities to rectify the bill as they
have issued a hefty amount vide bill dated 23.04.2022. That finding no
way out the petitioner made a written request to the SDO, PSPCL,
ZIRAKPUR and intimated the respondent for the issuance of the wrong
bill by them. But no revert was made by the respondent. Copy of the
written letter dated 11.05.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-11.
7. That again in the month of June, 2022 the petitioner gave a reminder
in respect of the written Petition submitted by the petitioner as on date
no revert has been received by the petitioner from the respondent.
Copy of the reminder letter dated 09.06.2022 along with the postal
recipient is annexed here as Annexure P-12.
8. That it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner has also filed
one RTI application seeking information in respect of the sundry
charges levied by the respondent on the petitioner. Copy of the RTI
application dated 25.07.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-13,
but as on date no reply had been received as the same has to be given
the department of the respondent.
9. That it is pertinent to mention here that in the month of October,2022
the petitioner again made an letter dated 18.10.2022 to the Executive
Engineer, PSPCL in which he has mentioned about the detail
communication made between the petitioner and the respondent,
further it is important to mention here that the petitioner has also
imitated in respect of the deceiving acts done by the respondent by
misusing their power and trying to grab money from the petitioner.
Copy of the letter dated 18.10.2022 is annexed here as Annexure P-
14.
10. That further it was a shock for the petitioner to see letter No
7421 dated 11.11.2022 in which the respondent levied false allegation
of electricity thief on the petitioner and furthermore, raised an
exorbitant demand of Rs. 84,786/- which needs to be paid by the
petitioner to the respondent. Copy of the letter dated 11.11.2022 is
annexed here as Annexure P-15.
11. That it is pertinent to mention that no such raid was conducted
by the enforcement team as mentioned in the letter dated 11.11.2022
issued by the respondent. Furthermore, the respondent had
concocted a false and baseless story to coverup the lacuna and to trap
the complainant and fetch unjustified and unreasonable amount.
It is pertinent to mention that no such raid was conducted by the
enforcement team as mentioned in the letter issued by the
respondent. Furthermore, the respondent had concocted a false and
baseless story to coverup the lacuna and to trap the complainant and
fetch unjustified and unreasonable amount.
12. That the Petitioner was in deep stress as the petitioner is a
respectful citizen and further is a member of RWA in the society he
residing the respondent levied false allegation of electricity thief
without any proof. In this respect the petitioner approached the higher
authorities in order to get the clarification in respect of the above
mention letter dated 11.11.2022. The petitioner got no response to his
reverses instead he was threatened that in case he does not pay the
amount mentioned in the letter dated 11.11.2022 his electricity
connection will be disconnected.
13. That the petitioner was having no other option but to fulfill the
unjustified and illegal demand of the respondent. The petitioner made
a payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on 17.10.2022 in
two transactions through internet banking vide internet banking no.
910968931 and 910969479 of Rs. 50,000/- each.
14. That it is pertinent to mention here that as per Punjab state
electricity Supply code amended up to 7 th Amendment as per the
provision of the code the respondent needs to comply with the
procedure to justify the allegation levied by them but no such
procedure was ever done by the respondent and they have wrongfully
and intentionally showing their monopoly wrongfully levied allegation
against the petitioner and raised illegitimate demands in the form of
sundry charges. For the perusal of this Hon’ble court 37.1 of the
Electricity Supply code is mentioned below :-
37.1 Procedure in a case of Theft of Electricity
37.1.1 An Authorized Officer, designated by the Govt. of Punjab under Section 135 of
the Act (Annexure-11) may enter, inspect, break open and search any place or premises
as per section 135(2) of the Act in which he has reason to believe or has been intimated
by an Assessing Officer under Regulation 36.1.5 that theft of electricity has occurred or
is occurring.
37.1.2 The Authorized Officer and other members of his team shall, at the time of
inspection carry identity cards, which shall on demand be shown to the consumer/
person present at site before entering the place/premises. Provided that no inspection,
search and seizure of any domestic places or premises shall be carried out between
sunset and sunrise except in the presence of an adult male member occupying such
premises.
37.1.3 Inspection Report
The Authorized Officer shall prepare an inspection report inter alia indicating
connected load, status of meter/metering equipment, condition of meter & seals
and any other irregularity noticed (such as means adopted for theft of electricity) in
such premises.
37.1.4 The Authorized Officer shall record evidence substantiating theft of electricity in the
premises and shall, wherever possible, photograph/ video graph the means of theft
of electricity with a camera having facility for recording date and time of event.
Where the theft of electricity is done through a tampered meter, such meter shall be
confiscated. No case for theft shall be booked merely on account of seals on the
meter missing or tampered or breakage of window glass unless dishonest
abstraction of electricity through these means is corroborated by consumption
pattern of the consumer and such other evidence as may be available.
37.1.5 The occupant of the place of search or any person on his behalf shall remain present
during the search and a list of all items seized in the course of such search shall be
prepared and delivered to such occupant or person who shall sign the list.
37.1.6 The Authorized Officer shall sign the inspection report and also obtain the signature
of the person/occupant present during the search and seizure. A copy of the
inspection report and seizure memo shall be handed over to the occupant/person
present at the premises during the search. In case of refusal to receive the
inspection report, a copy of the same shall be pasted at a conspicuous place
in/outside the premises and another copy sent to the consumer/ person under
registered post. In the case of suspected theft of electricity, the inspection report
shall indicate the time in which the occupant/person may respond to the said report
before the Authorized Officer gives his findings in accordance with Regulation
37.1.7(b).
37.1.7 Suspected case of Theft of Electricity:
(a) In case where a consumer is suspected to have indulged/indulging in theft of electricity
by tampering with the meter/metering equipment and/or its seals or otherwise then
such equipment shall be sealed by the Authorized Officer so as to keep it in ‘as found
condition’. However, the supply of such consumer shall continue with the newmeter.
The consumer or his representative shall also be permitted to affix his seal at that time.
(b) In all cases of suspected theft of electricity falling under Regulation 37.1.7 (a), the
Authorized Officer shall, after giving the consumer/person an opportunity of being
heard, determine within seven (7) days whether or not there is sufficient evidence to
conclude that a case of theft of electricity is prima facie established as per Section 135
of the Act.
(c) In case of suspected theft of electricity by tampering with meter/metering equipment
or its seals or otherwise, detected as per Regulation 37.1.7 (a) is not established, the
Authorized Officer shall record reasons thereof after which all further proceedings shall
be dropped and the consumer/person informed accordingly.
(d) In the event a suspected case of theft of electricity by tampering with meter/metering
equipment or its seals or otherwise is prima facie established as per Section 135 of the
Act, then further action shall be immediately initiated in accordance with Regulation
37.2.
No such procedure was followed by the respondent as on date
which is leading to unfair trade practice and deficiency of service.
16. That it is pertinent to mention here that the respondent
uninstalled the meter without any intimation further neither any report
in respect of the allegation levied by the respondent against the
petitioner nor any report has been signed by petitioner nor has been
given to the petitioner
17. That the petitioner made multiple requests to the respondent in
respect of the wrongful demand made by them but all that lead to no
veil.
18. That it is pertinent to mention here that this Hon’ble court had
the territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction as the petitioner is the
permanent resident of Zirakpur, Mohali, and Punjab.
19. That the petitioner had not filed any other similar complaint
before any court of law other than CC/141/2023 titled as Lakha Singh
Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited which was dismissed
because of the reason that Hon’ble commission was not having
jurisdiction to deal with the present case. Copy of the order dated
21.08.2023 is annexed here as Annexure P-11.
Place: Mohali
Dated:________ Deponent
Verification:
Verified that the content of my above affidavit are correct and true to
my best of knowledge and nothing is false and concealed therein.
Place: Mohali
Dated: ________ Deponent
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, S.A.S. NAGAR
(MOHALI) (EXERCISING THE POWER OF SPECIAL COURT, UNDER
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003)
PETITION No_____/2024
Mr. Lakha Singh aged ______ S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab. … Petitioner
Vs.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Authorized
representative
…Respondent
Stay Application for restraining the respondent
from Disconnecting the electricity supply of
the complainant during the pendency of the
present suit.
Respectfully Showeth:
1. That the above noted suit is been filed in this Hon’ble Court.
2. That the facts/grounds mentioned in the plaint be read as part of the
present application.
3. That the petitioner is moving this present application from restraining
the respondents from disconnecting the electricity connection during
the pendency of the present case. the suit of the Applicant/Plaintiff is
likely to succeed.
4. That the Applicant/Plaintiff has got prima facie case. The balance of
convenience is also in his favour.
5. That the Applicant/Plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss in case ad-
interim injunction as prayed in the Application is not granted to the
Applicant/Plaintiff.
It is therefore, respectfully prayed that an ad-interim injunction
restraining the Respondent No.1 from disconnecting the electricity
connection of the petitioner.
Petitioner
Place :- Mohali
Dated :-
Through Counsel
(Sharad Gautam And Jasdeep Singh )
Advocates
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, S.A.S. NAGAR
(MOHALI) (EXERCISING THE POWER OF SPECIAL COURT, UNDER
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003)
PETITION No_____/2024
Mr. Lakha Singh aged ______ S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab. … Petitioner
Vs.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Authorized
representative
…Respondent
Affidavit of Mr. Lakha Singh aged _____ S/o
Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab.
1. That the above noted suit is been filed in this Hon’ble Court.
2. That the facts/grounds mentioned in the plaint be read as part of the
present application.
3. That the petitioner is moving this present application from restraining
the respondents from disconnecting the electricity connection during
the pendency of the present case. the suit of the Applicant/Plaintiff is
likely to succeed.
4. That the Applicant/Plaintiff has got prima facie case. The balance of
convenience is also in his favour.
5. That the Applicant/Plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss in case ad-
interim injunction as prayed in the Application is not granted to the
Applicant/Plaintiff.
Place: Mohali
Dated:________ Deponent
Verification:
Verified that the content of my above affidavit are correct and true to
my best of knowledge and nothing is false and concealed therein.
Place: Mohali
Dated: ________ Deponent
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, S.A.S. NAGAR
(MOHALI) (EXERCISING THE POWER OF SPECIAL COURT, UNDER
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003)
PETITION No_____/2024
Mr. Lakha Singh aged ______ S/o Tara Singh R/o House No. 101, BL-M, Maya
Garden, Ph 2, Zirakpur, Punjab. … Petitioner
Vs.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Authorized
representative
Respondent
INDEX
Sr. No Particular Dated Page
No.
1. Saty Application
2. Affidavit in Support
3. Petition Under Section 154(5) Of The
Electricity Act, 2023.
4. Affidavit in support
5. List Of Documents
6. Documents as per list
7. Process Fee
8. Vakalatnama
Place :- Mohali
Dated :-
Through Counsel
(Sharad Gautam And Jasdeep Singh )
Advocates
