Underground vs Overhead Cables
Underground vs Overhead Cables
dx
R R q R q
V g x dx dx ln volts.....eq(2)
r r 2 o r x 2 o r r
Dielectric Stress in Cable Contd….
• Combining eq(1) and eq(2) gives
V
gx .....V / m...................eq 3
R
x ln
r
• The maximum stress will occur at the smallest radius i.e x = r.
• The stress is a maximum at the surface of the conductor . The maximum
stress is given by
V
g max ......V / m............eq 4
R
r ln
r
• When x = R, the stress will be a minimum which indicates that stress has a
minimum value at the sheath. The minimum value is given by
V
g min ......V / m........eq 5
R
R ln
r
Dielectric Stress in Cable Contd….
• Also g max R
g min r
• The electric stress in a belted cable cannot be calculated accurately due to non
uniformity of the dielectric and the distortion in the electrostatic field.
• The present day tendency is to design high voltage cables on the basis of a fixed
maximum value of operating stress. The stress is expressed in kilovolts per
millimetre.
• Eq (4) is then utilized to determine the thickness of insulation necessary for a
given diameter of conductor.
• It is evident from eq(4) that greater the value of permissible stress lesser will be
the insulation thickness. It is desirable to choose a higher value of operating
stress in order to have a reduced thickness of insulation and therefore reduced
size of cable.
• Since smaller cables size affords more economy there is a tendency to increase
the operating stresses to their highest values without failures to cable either
under actual operating conditions or during its approval specified tests.
Most economical size of cable
• Maximum potential gradient,
V
g max
R
r ln
r
• If V and R are constant and r is made variable the expression above has a
minimum value when the denominator is a maximum. This occurs when
d R
r ln 0;
dr r
• Solving this we get,
R
e 2.718
r
• This is the condition that would make the voltage gradient at the
conductor surface a minimum.
Grading of Cables
• The process of achieving uniform electrostatic stress in the dielectric of
cables is known as grading of cables.
• It has been observed that the stress is greatest at the surface of the
conductor and goes on decreasing as we move towards the sheath.
• If the dielectric be chosen according to the maximum stress the thickness
of the cable would change considerably.
• Moreover the benefit of the chosen dielectric would not be achieved fully
near the sheath.
• If all the dielectric were equally stressed the thickness of insulation would
be considerably reduced. This would reduce the cost of cable insulation.
• Moreover the heat generated in the conductor can be more easily
conducted to the sheath.
• For this reason stress has to be equally distributed in the cable.
• There are two methods of grading:-
• Capacitance grading
• Intersheath grading.
Grading of Cables Contd…..
• Capacitance Grading: the process of achieving uniformity in the dielectric
stress by using layers of different dielectrics is known as capacitance
grading.
• Intersheath Grading: in this method a homogenous dielectric is used but it
is divide into various layers by placing metallic intersheaths between the
core and lead sheath. The intersheaths are held at suitable potentials which
are in between the core potential and the earth potential. This
arrangement improves voltage distribution in the dielectric of the cable and
consequently more uniform potential gradient is obtained.
• Disadvantages:
1. Cable grading is of theoretical interest only. The main disadvantage of the
capacitance grading is that the range of permittivity values of insulating
materials available for cable insulation is limited. Moreover the permittivity's of
the layers may not remain constant during the service period of the cable.
Consequently the stress distribution may change and even cause insulation
breakdown at the normal operating voltage.
2. The intersheaths , being very thin, are liable to damage during transportation
or installation. They are not able to carry the charging current of long cable
lines and thus the current carrying capacity of the cable is reduced.
Cable Capacitance
• The capacitance of cable transmission line is very much than that of an overhead
line of the same length due to the following reasons:-
1. the distance between the conductors is very small.
2. The distance between the cores and the earthed sheath is also small.
3. The permittivity of the cable insulation is usually 3 to 5 times greater than that of air
insulation around the conductors of overhead lines.
• It is easier to calculate the capacitance of overhead system accurately if its
configuration be known, but for a cable such a calculation is only approximate.
• The approximate method of cable capacitance is based on the assumption that the
cable dielectric is perfectly homogeneous. The insulation of a cable is however far
from being homogeneous or uniform.
Charging Current or Capacitive Current
• An underground power cable has the capability to store and release
electrical energy with the voltage variation; it works as a shunt
capacitance generating a capacitive current which is in quadrature with
the resistive or load current.
• The capacitive or charging current has a limiting effect on cable rating
capacity.
• This effect is quantified by the fact that when intended to supply energy to
an active load consumer in a radial network, via a power cable circuit, it is
needed to inject a higher current at the source to compensate for cable
capacitance.
• The charging current is calculated with the following equation:
I c CV 106
• where,
Ic = Charging Current (A/km)
w = 2πf; f = system frequency
C = capacitance per unit length (μF/km)
V = Applied voltage (Volts)
Charging Current or Capacitive Current Contd…..
• The charging current generates heat losses in cable which are of a
significant magnitude in very long high and extra high A.C. underground
power cable connections.
• In addition to the heating effect of charging current the cable capacitance
may have an impact on steady-state voltages across the power system to
which the cable is connected.
• The voltage may rise, especially at low loads, due to charging current
flowing through cable series inductances and through system inductances;
phenomenon known as Ferranti effect.
• The Ferranti effect is significant with long cables energized from one end.
• In this kind of situations the network voltage stabilization is carried out by
adjusting the voltage magnitude at generator by reducing the field
excitation or by lowering the voltage taps on transformers.
• However in case of long cable circuits, the compensation of charging
current requires installation of shunt reactors connected at one end or
both end of cable circuits which are selected based on specialized system
studies by taking into consideration cable specific data and system
parameters.
Capacitances in a three Core Belted Cable
• The conductors in a cable are separated from each other by dielectric.
Similarly, there is dielectric between the conductors and the sheath.
• When a potential difference is applied between the conductors the cable
in effect is a combination of six capacitances. The capacitances between
the conductors are represented by Cc, while those between conductor
and sheath is represented by Cs.
• Thus a three phase belted cable may be represented by a system of
capacitances connected in star and delta as shown in fig 2.
• The delta connected Cc may be replaced by equivalent star connected
capacitances C1 as shown in fig 3.. The capacitance between the pair of
terminals will be the same in the two systems.
• Capacitance between A and B in the delta system = Cc 0.5Cc 1.5Cc
C0 C1 Cs 3Cc Cs
• If VL be the line voltage , Vp be the phase voltage , the charging current
per phase is
VL
I c V pCo 3Cc Cs ... A
3
• Note: Co is the capacitance between any conductor screen for a 3 core
screened cable.
Measurement of Cc and Cs
• The non uniformity of the insulation material, the variation in the shape of
conductors and the use of filler makes it difficult to estimate the capacitance of a
cable from its diameter. The following tests are generally performed:-
a) One conductor is say C is connected to the sheath or insulated and the
capacitance is measured between the remaining two conductors A and B.
Fig7(a) reduces to fig 7(b).
The total capacitance CL measured between the cores A and B is
C CS 1 1
CL CC C 3Cc Cs Co
2 2 2
The single measurement is sufficient for calculating the charging current per
conductor.
b) The three conductors are connected or bunched together Fig8 and the
capacitance is measured between this bunch and the sheath . Let it be denoted
by Cb. Here Cc becomes zero and Cb = 3 Cs.
c) Two conductors, say A and B are joined together and the capacitance is
measured between them and remaining conductor.(fig 9) The capacitance
between B and C is = 2 2 2
CC CC CS 3CC CS CO
3 3 3
d) Two conductors B and C are connected to sheath and the capacitance is
measured between these and the third conductor A (as shown in fig 10).
The capacitance measured in this case is
CS CC CC 2CC CS
• From the above tests the values of Cc and Cs can also be determined
separately.
Fig2 Fig3
Losses in Cable
• Losses in Conductor
• Losses in dielectric
• Losses in sheath.
Losses in Conductor
• Resistive Losses :
• Skin Effect: current pressed to the outer region of the conductor due to its
own current.
• Conductivity of Insulation:-
The resistance of dielectric is very high but not infinite and therefore, a small
current flows due to the conductivity of the dielectric. This current is called
the leakage current. The leakage current through the insulation resistance
gives rise to a power loss in the dielectric. This power loss is termed as
leakage loss.
Dielectric hysteresis or dielectric absorption.
• If a constant d.c voltage is applied across a cable the current in the
beginning is very high. The current decreases gradually to a low steady
state value determined by the cable insulation. This steady state value of
current is called the conduction current.
• On removal of applied voltage the current does not become zero
instantaneously, but the cable is discharging for practically the same
length of time as it took previously to attain its steady state value before
the dielectric is fully discharged.
• However the amount of charge released is somewhat lesser than that
stored in dielectric during charge. A part of the absorbed charge
recombines with the dielectric.
• If an alternating voltage be applied to the cable, the dielectric is subjected
to several cycles of charge and discharge per second. A power loss takes
place in the material of the dielectric due to constant changing of
absorbed charge. This loss due to absorption is much greater than that in
the insulation resistance.
Corona or Gaseous Ionization in Cables
• The spaces or voids in the cables are filled up with the vapours of the
impregnating oil and air.
• The dielectric strength of the voids or gaseous spaces within the insulation
is very small compared with that of insulation.
• If the applied potential gradient in the insulation is large there is a
concentration of field intensity in the spaces resulting in the ionization or
corona discharge.
• Thus a breakdown of insulation may occur at relatively low stresses and
temperatures.
• The life of the cable is thus affected.
Dielectric Power Loss
• The cable behaves as an imperfect capacitor. The equivalent circuit is
shown if Fig11.
R1
IR1
I
Ic C
Fig 11
• Let
• V = line – to – neutral supply voltage.
• IR1 = Current through R1.
• Ic = charging current.
• I = supply current.
Dielectric Power Loss Contd….
• The current I leads the applied voltage Ic I
by an angle φ.
• Dielectric angle = δ= (90-φ).
• For a single phase line ,
the dielectric power loss
Pd VI cos VI R1 δ
φ
• From the phasor diagram IR1 V
I R1
tan ;
IC
I R1 IC tan V Co tan
Pd VI R1 V 2 Co tan
Dielectric Power Loss Contd….
• Since δ is usually very small
tan
Pd V 2Co ......watts
Pd 3V p 2 Co
• These simple tests can be used to locate the earth fault or short circuit
fault in underground cables provided that a sound cable runs parallel
along the faulty cable. Both these tests employ the principle of
Wheatstone bridge for fault location.
Murray Loop Test
• This test is the most common and accurate method of locating earth fault
or short circuit faults in underground cables.
Earth Fault:
Test End Far End
Faulty Cable
E Earth Path
• Or, PQ R X
Q X
• If r is the resistance of each cable , then R+X = 2r
P Q 2r
Q X
Q
or , X 2r
PQ
Murray Loop Test
• If l is the length of each cable in metres, then resistance per metre length
of cables = r/l.
• Distance of fault point from the test end is
X Q l Q
d 2r 2l
r /l P Q r PQ
• Or , d = (Q/(P+Q))× (loop length).
• Thus the position of the fault is located.
• Note that resistance of the fault is in the battery circuit and not in the
bridge circuit . Therefore fault resistance does not affect the balancing of
the bridge. However if the fault resistance is high the sensitivity of the
bridge is reduced.
Murray Loop Test
Short Circuit Fault:
Test End Far End
Sound Cable B
C Faulty Cable D
resistances P and Q. -
B X
Bridge:
P R
Q X
PQ R X 2r
or ,
Q X X
Q
X 2r
PQ
• X = (Q/(P+Q))× (loop length) metres
• Thus the position of the fault is located.
Varley Loop Test
• This test is also used to locate earth fault or short circuit fault in
underground cables. This test also employs Wheatstone bridge principle. It
differs from Murray Loop test in that here the ratio arms P and Q are fixed
resistances. Balance is obtained by adjusting the variable resistance S
connected to the test end of the faulty cable.
• Now key K2 is thrown to position 2 (for earth fault or short circuit fault)
and bridge is balanced with new value of resistance S2. Then,
P R X
Q S2
or , R X Q PS2 .............(ii )
X
d metres
r