Santos, Outro Texto2
Santos, Outro Texto2
ABSTRACT The article argues that the impeachment occurred in Brazil in 2016 configures a
political crisis. Among other factors, the text highlights the politicization of the Judiciary and
the conservative alliance between parties and right-wing social movements. Offering a kind
of democratic reconstruction agenda, we affirm the urgency of a broad-based progressive co-
alition to contain the advance of setbacks in Brazil today. In such a coalition, it is fudamental
the hability for the inclusion of diverse social cleavages, democratic voices and multiple social
classes.
RESUMO O artigo defende que o impeachment ocorrido no País em 2016 não representa uma
crise institucional, mas uma crise política. Foi a ação coordenada de atores, e não nosso modelo
institucional, que levou à ruptura democrática. Dentre outros fatores, o texto destaca a politiza-
ção do Judiciário e a aliança entre partidos e movimentos sociais conservadores. Ao fim, mirando
numa agenda de reconstrução, afirma-se a urgência de uma ampla coalizão de corte progres-
sista para conter o avanço dos retrocessos hoje em curso no Brasil. Em tal coalizão, é central a
capacidade de abertura e articulação com e entre clivagens sociais diversas, vozes democráticas
e múltiplas frações de classe.
1 Universidade Estadual
do Rio de Janeiro (Uerj),
Instituto de Estudos Sociais
e Políticos (Iesp) – Rio de
Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
fsantos@iesp.uerj.br
2 Universidade Estadual
Saúde Debate | rio de Janeiro, v. 40, n. especial, p. 114-121, DEZ 2016 DOI: 10.1590/0103-11042016S10
The ingredients that characterize the the logic of rupturing the established politi-
Brazilian socio-political framework are of cal agreement, whose rules the majority of
various kinds: social and ideological polar- the right-wing partisan used to agree, at least
ization, popular and student mobilization, publicly, since the years 1990, and, conse-
political crisis, fiscal crisis, acute reces- quently, fights for political power in a legiti-
sion and mass unemployment, electoral mate way. The rupture carried out by means
dispute and reconfiguration, oligopolized of an impeachment leastly artful, a rupture
media with increasingly affiliation to politi- carried out by means of the insidious use of
cal parties and aligned to specific sectors of our institutions, places once again the col-
the power structure, growing fascism of our lective task of democratic reconstruction in
political culture elements, itself historically the troublesome Brazilian political history.
illiberal, judicial institutional anomie and Parliamentary coup, there is no doubt
partisan ploys fit together forming a scenar- about it, but what matters now is thinking on
io unthinkable until few years ago. how we arrived here. We will follow by parts.
As for this conjuncture analysis, let us Let us first deal with the congressional
dwell on some of those points, highlighting arena and with the so-called crisis of repre-
whether and how, in our view, they are mu- sentativeness. At once, it is relevant to affirm
tually reinforcing. Far from trying to exhaust that the August 2016 event is the result of
each of those ingredients, further analysis the deliberate action committed by political
are suggested to explore the issue on how leaders that did not configurate, definitely,
such and several other variables interact in the operation effect of the institutions. It is
order to produce this kind of semi chaotic obviously tempting to identify in the politi-
scenario. For example: to what extent both cal institutions, particularly in the core rules
the global economic crisis and our fiscal that define our political model, the causes of
crisis impacted on the recent polarization instability and governability crisis that ended
in Brazil? How to measure the influence, up in the parliamentary coup. The concept
for the success of the parliamentary coup, of and practice of coalition presidentialism, in
the ongoing crisis feeding by a media clearly a broader and less rigorous definition, return
party-biased? And returning a bit more back- with full force to the scene, as it became
wards: what is the relation, if any, between common to account that institutional model
the 2013 cycle of protests and the parliamen- for an extraordinary set of evils of which the
tary coup? Brazilian policy would suffer. We talk about
Within the limits of our interpretation, we broader definition, because, in fact, the term
will discuss the parliamentary coup carried coalition presidentialism, in a more restricted
out by the unified front of the Brazilian understanding, and in our view more precise,
Democratic Movement Party (PMDB), in the as it is applied in the stricto sensu institution-
light of tensions between actors (political or alist literature, only denotes the conjugation
social ones), and the institutional arrange- of powers separation, characteristic of the
ments in which they operate. The analy- multiparty presidential system commonly
sis focuses on three arenas: the National derived from the adoption of proportional
Congress, the Legal power and the civil representation for the occupation of seats in
society. Before moving on to such arenas, the Legislative power.
it is central to establish the premise from Those who criticize our institutional
which we set out, already displayed in the model, called coalition presidentialism,
article initial issues: what happens in the establish some kind of wrong causal link
current Brazilian policy is the continuation between the dynamics of such model and the
of a parliamentary coup. In other words, it is political practice that not only undermines,
their followers, and the effects then arising Power, before organisms of the Executive
on the 2016 electoral dispute, particularly and Legislative Powers leads us straight to
about the television time destined to smaller the essential alert given by Max Weber (1993)
parties and to debates between parties and and his Weimar Republic contemporaries:
candidates. Pernicious effects may also rest the public officer cannot be involved in po-
on the political system in case current pro- litical dispute or its respective conviction.
posals circulating in Congress and media Public officer and professional politician
win, advocating, for example, the adoption competences are as distinct as are the re-
of optional vote. Far from healing alleged sponsibilities assigned for each post. Weber’
institutional illnesses, false medicines as one of the greatest fears was that his country
those tend to harm our governance and politics became a hostage of the bureaucracy
representativeness. – that lesson cannot be overlooked today by
As we said before, the political crisis that those who, like us, understand the harmful
ended up in a coup and now takes on new potential contained in an instance of power
shape does not result from the functioning that, in the name of fighting corruption, acts
of institutions, but from their usurpation and illegally.
misuse by means of fundamental segments Ironically, although we speak of our po-
of elites and State leaders. litical model institutional crisis, it does not
Among the State elites starring that emerge from the coalition presidentialism.
process, stand out, with no doubt, the elites In fact, serious distortions hit the own design
of the Legal Power and of the Federal Public of our control institutions, disrespecting the
Prosecutor (MPF), whose behavior during 1988 Constitution. In this particular, recent
the whole process occurred, as we all know, interventions by the Superior Electoral Court
covered-up by the mantle of the political (TSE), for example, on electoral and party
corruption combating. In a shrewd analysis, rules as well as on selective and partidar-
Leonardo Avritzer already called our atten- ian attacks guided by MPF against political
tion to the dangers of the MPF uncontrolled leaders reverberate one of the most famous
action and its implications in terms of ‘en- Madisonians concerns: who controls the con-
croachment’ and ‘monopolization’ of the trollers? The administrative intervention on
public interest protection coming from such the political dispute requires not only its the-
behavior by institutions deprived from vote oretical criticism. Rather, it requires the po-
endorsement. In the author’ words: litical action from whom that, after all, is the
main affected by the instability of the demo-
[...] the way, in 2015 first semester, the Le- cratic game – instability judicially instilled –,
gal Power entrenched the Executive Power and also the only sovereign of that same game:
for questionable political practices, such as the popular will. In this sense, two necessary
the selective leaking of information regard- and converged paths for the pacification of
ing Lava Jato Operation and the excess of the Legal Power and the Executive Power
preventive arrests and of delations intended control instances seem to be the deepening
to destabilize politics, shows the danger of a of control mechanisms both institutionalized
solution for the impasses not processed by and external to those institutions.
the powers elected by popular vote. (AVRITZER, The task is not going to be an easy one, as
2016, p. 116). was not the democratization consecrated in
the 1988 Charter. The first challenge surely
Such an intervention, politicized and involves the responsibility of actors that
spurious, of agents and control institutions, destabilized and usurped the democratic
whether or not pertaining to the Legal dynamics conquered until today. In terms
of political and institutional dispute, masks ‘liberal’ label – actually, it contains few lib-
of actors who advocate a reheated scholarly eralism and some distorted reading of the
liberalism, or solely a neoliberal one, should so-called neoliberalism. On the other hand,
be recognized as such. In terms of politi- politicians and mottos that consider them-
cal culture, the phenomenon is even more selves right-wing but that end up removing
complex: the middle class growing fascism, legitimacy from that mass stimulated by
fueled not only by the economic crisis but themselves. Well, they, and no other, were
also by the Legal Power and hegemonic the so-called ‘voice of the streets’ heard
media, is the reality we deem essential to and listened in the statements that buried
know and oppose. Our last item concerns the Dilma’ government in August 2016. Let us
growing fascism among us and the civil mo- remember that ‘in the name of the family’,
bilizations coming from both the right-wing ‘God’ and even ‘against the communism’ (sic)
as the left one. were allegories circulating among the streets
In the field of civil society, the context and within the Congress, designing most of
is equal or even more complex and full of pro-impeachment speeches. The affinity
challenges. between the represented and representatives
The green and yellow mobilization ‘of the’ right-wing is, however, contingent
winning the streets in March, April and and strategic; to the extent that they answer
August 2015 knew how to appropriate one to their interests, political parties will con-
of the 2013 main legacies: the street as le- tinue taking advantage of the mass, always
gitimate stage of protests (DOWBOR and SZWAKO, in an opportunistic manner. Here, the demo-
2013). Under the cries of ‘Dilma Out’ and ‘PT cratic reconstruction challenge is twofold: to
Out’, a mass of fascist verve was fueled by build a civilized alternative to the conserva-
right-wing movements, which, as we know tive project prevailing in the Country and to
today, were and still are linked to ultra-con- fight for broader social and electoral bases,
servative north-american groups. A question being and alternative for both.
arises here: why call fascist such vast and Today, while the streets are back to protest
heterogeneous crowds? We call them as such against the current illegitimate government,
due to their inability to recognize as legiti- the stage of claims is taken by high school
mate a plurality of interests and world views students and by school interdiction through-
that are constitutive and, mainly, distinctive out Brazil. Despite variations among states,
of democracy in complex societies. Denying the interdiction movement of schools is en-
such plurality corresponds to, in the 2015 tirely crossed by the parliamentary coup and
conservative speeches and protests analyzed its effects, namely, the 241 PEC (Proposal
elsewhere (SZWAKO, 2015), denying the legiti- of Constitutional Amendment), currently
macy of the conflict and the necessary insti- renumbered PEC 55/16. The post coup dy-
tutionalization of conflicts – without which namics of tension and of conflict between
there is no democratic and civilized coexis- mobilized citizenship and authorities, being
tence between various and divergent world them executive or repressive forces, actually,
interests and views. bestows a sad feeling of authoritarian déjà
It is exactly at that point that ideological vu to the situation. This can be observed by
polarization and partisan strategies articu- cops’ harassment of students, often illegal, as
late. On one hand, a new right, authoritar- well as by the activities of citizens self-called
ian, provides original clothing to the always ‘good’, handling conflicts in school prem-
predominant hierarchical rancidness, not ises. However, the authoritarian rancidness
in politics, not solely in politics, but also in is not limited to the example of students
the Brazilian society, now redesigned with and of reforms and tax cuts without any
consultation to interested parties. Another sense of timing and openness towards the
dramatic case of truculence and illegality spirit of inclusion and understanding. Such
applied by repressive forces in the post-coup unification, in turn, cannot prescind from in-
context is the violence suffered by Florestan stitutional arrangements within which par-
Fernandes School, addressed to the Landless ticipation and representation may combine
Workers Movement (MST); it was invaded a and balance – including all the partisan con-
few days ago by police officers working for flicts there arising. In that effort, it is essen-
the State of São Paulo in Brazil. tial to add up all the nuances of democratic
However, that déjà vu is ambivalent. voices compromised with minimally civi-
While it authorizes a desolate look on our lized and egalitarian values: from a broaden-
scenario, those scenes also evoke traces of ing ‘big centre’, mainstay of the Brazilian
political hope in the student mobilization as re-democratization, to radical voices, and
in landless workers. necessarily involving liberals, communists
Moderating the Legal Power, democra- and social democrats. An arc of polyclassist
tizing media, blaming those who violated alliances of democratic color, tacking periph-
the democratic pact and restraining the ad- eries, middle classes and a non-conservative
vances of a regressive illegitimate agenda liberal business community is fundamental
are some of these challenges. The feasible for that project. Against that necessarily
path to agglutinate characters, speeches and heterogeneous set of voices, the emergence
flags is located in the overcoming of what J. of an authoritarian conservative wave or of
Feres Júnior called ‘belly button complex’. a new crypto-militarist right-wing will keep
Democratic left-wing forces, also within the endeavor of winning the political fight
the civil scope as in the partisan struggle, against truculence and intimidation – there
need to overcome ideological isolated per- is need to face fear. One of the good strate-
fectionisms obstacling the construction and gies to face fear is searching for elements
broadening of new comprehensive consen- and tracks of democratic coexistence even
sus. Those consensuses necessarily imply within the reactionarism.
dialogues and bridges not yet accomplished, The reconstruction is difficult, although
they need firstly to be forged with the due inevitable. s
References
AVRITZER, L. Impasses da democracia no Brasil. Rio de POGREBINSCHI, T.; SANTOS, F. Participação como
Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2016. representação: o impacto das Conferências Nacionais
de Políticas Públicas no Congresso Nacional. Dados,
AVRITZER, L.; SOUZA, C. (Org.). Conferências Rio de Janeiro, v. 54, n. 3, p. 259-305, set. 2011.
nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e
efetividade. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2013. SZWAKO, J. O fascismo contemporâneo brasileiro
ou o mundo segundo o conservadorismo. Revista
DOWBOR, M.; SZWAKO, J. Respeitável público...: Escuta, [s.l.], 18 maio 2016. Disponível em: <https://
performance e organização dos movimentos antes dos revistaescuta.wordpress.com/2016/05/18/
protestos de 2013. Novos Estudos Cebrap, São Paulo, n. escuta-especial-conjuntura-o-fascismo-
97, p. 43-55, nov. 2013. contemporaneo-brasileiro-ou-o-mundo-segundo-o-
conservadorismo/>. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2016.
FERES JÚNIOR, J. Como religar a esquerda: para além
do complexo do umbigo. Revista CGN, Rio de Janeiro, WEBER, M. Parlamento e Governo na Alemanha
07 nov. 2016. Disponível em: <jornalggn.com.br/blog/ reordenada: crítica política do funcionalismo e da
joao-feres-junior/como-religar-a-esquerda-para-alem- natureza dos partidos. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro:
do-complexo-do-umbigo-por-joao-feres-jr>. Acesso Vozes, 1993.
em: 7 dez. 2016.
ZAREMBERG, G. Fuerza, proyecto, palabra y pueblo:
FREITAS, A. O Presidencialismo da Coalizão. Rio de circuitos de representación en consejos de desarrollo
Janeiro: Fundação Konrad Adenauer, 2016. municipal en América Latina (Nicaragua, Venezuela,
Brasil y México). In: ZAREMBERG, G. (Org.). Redes y
GURZA LAVALLE, A.; SZWAKO, J. Origens da Política jerarquías: participación, representación y gobernanza
Nacional de Participação Social: Entrevista com Pedro local en América Latina. Ciudad de Mexico: Flacso
Pontual. Novos Estudos Cebrap, São Paulo, n. 99, p. 91- México, 2012, p. 22-63.
104, jul., 2014.