Criminal Preposition
Criminal Preposition
               Moot Proposition
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
                                Table Of Contents
Sr No                        Particulars              Page No
  3.    (ANNEXURE-1)                                   9 - 11
        First Information Report
  4.    (ANNEXURE-2)                                  12 - 13
        Spot Panchnama
  5.    (ANNEXURE-3)                                  14 - 15
        Property Search And Seizure Form
  6.    (ANNEXURE-4)                                  16 - 18
        Arrest/ Court Surrender Memo
  7.    (ANNEXURE-5)                                    19
        Memorandum Panchnama
  8.    (ANNEXURE-6)                                    20
        Weapon Examination Report
  9.    (ANNEXURE-7)                                    21
        Chemical Analyzer Report
  10. (ANNEXURE-8)                                    22 - 26
      Post Mortem Report
  11. (ANNEXURE-9)                                    27 - 28
      Statement Of Prosecution Witness-1
  12. (ANNEXURE-9)                                      29
      Statement Of Prosecution Witness-2
  13. (ANNEXURE-10)                                     30
      Statement Of Defence Witness-1
  14. (ANNEXURE-10)                                     31
      Statement Of Defence Witness-2
2|Page
                                 19th KSHAN-2024
                                MOOT PROPOSITION
                              STATEMENT OF FACTS
● Shlok Dixit is a businessman in Nagpur and Isha Agnihotri was a Philosophy student
and a mehndi artist at Nagpur. They were in a love affair for almost 2 years. Isha turned
18 in June 2021 after which their marriage got solemnised in a temple. Since then, they
lived as husband and wife for about 8 months and then they separated due to constant
quarrels between them. Isha was living with her parents since last 1 year.
● On 04/10/2023, Isha informed her mother that Shlok was constantly forcing her to come
back and stay with him. Allegedly he also threatened to kill her if she didn’t come back.
Also, Shlok used to call and harass Isha’s younger sister Reema about the same.
● On 05/10/2023 Isha and her mother went to drop off Reema to the railway station as
she had a train for Pune. After Reema departed, at around 9 p.m., Isha received a call
on her mobile phone from Shlok, who asked to see her. After thinking for some time,
she informed her mother about the same and left to meet him.
● When Isha didn’t revert back to her mother’s calls or texts, her mother got worried
about her so, she called Isha’s father and told him about what is concerning her, to
which he said that “Isha and Shlok are married, after all. If they are resolving their
issues, then what’s the harm in it!”. After hearing this she was still worried but
eventually stopped calling her daughter and was waiting for her to return.
● After some more time had passed and when Isha did not return, her parents got
worried and tried to go and find her and found her dead body lying on the street at a
distance from a kirana shop. The police station was informed of the same. The PI
carried out a Spot and Seizure Panchnama, recovered the alleged weapon involved in
the crime (knife), collected the required samples and sent them for the analysis.
3|Page
                                  19th KSHAN-2024
                                 MOOT PROPOSITION
● The IO also sent the dead body for postmortem, recorded statements of witnesses,
found and arrested the accused i.e. Shlok. The accused allegedly claimed that at the
relevant time of the incident he was involved in the closing of the butcher shop run by
him and his uncle. The reports from the experts, in respect to the injuries to the
deceased and the seized articles, were also collected. The investigation was completed
and the chargesheet was filed in the court of Hon’ble Sessions Judge, Nagpur.
4|Page
          19th KSHAN-2024
         MOOT PROPOSITION
5|Page
          19th KSHAN-2024
         MOOT PROPOSITION
6|Page
          19th KSHAN-2024
         MOOT PROPOSITION
7|Page
          19th KSHAN-2024
         MOOT PROPOSITION
8|Page
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
                                   (ANNEXURE-1)
                           FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
                               (Under Section 154 CR.P.C.)
S. No Acts Sections
  3. Offence:
       a) Occurrence of offence:
          Day: Thursday      Date from: 05/10/2023           Date To: 05/10/2023
          Time Period:       Time From: 22:30                Time To: 22:30
       b) Information Received at P.S.      Date: 05/10/2023       Time: 23:15
       c) General Diary Reference Entry No: 007              Date & Time: 06/10/2023
  4. Type of Information: Oral
  5. Place of Occurrence:
       a) Direction and distance from P.S.: 1Km North              Beat No:
       b) Address: Gajanan Nagar, Bajediya, kirana Shop Alley, Mankapur, Nagpur
       c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station,
          Name of P.S                       District (State)
  6. Complainant/Informant:
       a) Name: Mrs. Sushma Agnihotri
       b) Father’s/Husband Name: Mr. Shankar Prasad Agnihotri
       c) Year of Birth: 1985        d) Nationality: India         e) UID No:
       f) Passport No:                      Date of Issue:                Place of Issue:
       g) Id Details:
S. No ID Type ID Number
9|Page
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
       h) Address:
Dixit
10 | P a g e
                                 19th KSHAN-2024
                                MOOT PROPOSITION
      13.      Action Taken:
       Since the above information reveals commission of offence u/s as mentioned at
       item No. 2
       a) Registered case & took up the investigation: Rajdeep Shinde (PI)/POCD81894
       b) Directed (Name of IO):          Rank:
       c) Refused Investigation Due to
       d) Transfer to P.S on Point of Jurisdiction:           District:
11 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
                                     (ANNEXURE-2)
                                   SPOT PANCHANAMA
Panch Name:
   1. Devansh Ahuja, Age 27 years, Occ.- chemist, Res. 203, Mankapur, Nagpur, P.S.
       Mankapur
   2. Sunny Gupta, Age- 32 years, Occu- Bank Clerk, Res. 207, Mankapur, Nagpur, P.S.
       Mankapur
   Through a notice letter to the above Panchas, were summoned at Takdhi Nagpur, The
Panch voluntarily appeared and informed about Entry No. 25 on 05/10/2023, Time 23:55 hrs.
Sushma Agnihotri, age 38 years informed that her daughter is found dead. When we and the
police station staff arrived at the location, we found a girl approximately 20 years old lying
in a pool of blood. We inquired around the area. The deceased, Mrs. Isha Dixit, was
identified by her mother, stating, "This is our daughter, Isha Shlok Dixit, aged 19 years,
residing at Shivnagar, Godhani Road," thus confirming her identity. After requesting the
Panchas, the Namudra Panchas willingly consented to appear, and the Pancha Samaj
documented the Panchanama at the crime scene as follows.
   We guided the Panchas to the location of the incident. It's situated behind on the road
from Godhani Main Road to Sant Gajanan, near K. D. R Heights Apartment, on a regular
road. When we showed the deceased girl's body to her parents, who had come to the scene,
they clearly said, "This is our daughter Isha," confirming her identity without any doubt.
   Upon close examination of the scene in the presence of the Panchas, a lifeless body of a
young girl was discovered lying on the tarmac road, surrounded by a pool of blood. The
location is on the left side of the road when moving from Godhani Main Road to Sant
Gajanan Nagar. The orientation of the body places the head towards the east and the feet
towards the west. One hand is tucked in, while the other rests outward. The deceased is
attired in a white kurta with blue floral patterns and a blue salwar. A mobile phone with
broken screen was found near the waist. The examination reveals a visible wound on the
deceased's hand, with a throat cut in an east-west direction.
12 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
           The height of the deceased is 5.5 feet, and blood has spread on the road
below. Measuring
from the feet of the deceased, electric pole no. 45-8 is situated 52 feet away and is square-
shaped.
   Sadguru Apartment is located on the left side beyond Namud Road, approximately 25
feet away. Blood is observed at a distance of 8.4 feet from the eyes of the deceased. The
distance from the deceased's head to the intersection is 36 feet in the east direction, with Mr.
Randhawa’s bungalow on the left side.
   The above-mentioned dead body was sent by the Investing Officer Rajdeep, in a van, to
GMC, Nagpur. The details of the seized articles from the spot are as follows:
            i.     00/-- Sharp steel Knife with blood stains
            ii.    00/-- Blood sample soaked in cloth
            iii.   00/-- sample of mixed blood sample
            iv.    00/-- plain soil sample
            v.     00/-- a pair of used lady's slippers of new white colour with blood stains
                   on them
            vi.    00/-- 1 mobile phone, with broken screen
            00/- Rs. 00/- five cases of the goods in question were seized.
       After explaining the contents of the above sample report to the Panchas, the
investigating officer took custody of and the investigation materials brought along with him.
        Observing the boundaries of the said site, Mr. Randhawa’s bungalow is situated in
the east, while Sadguru apartments are in the west.
       The Panchnama proceedings for the said incident site, as per the observed situation,
commenced today on the date of 06/10/2023 at 12:05am hours under the illumination of
INFLATABLE LIGHT and concluded at 02.36am hours. The process was conducted on-site.
The Panchas read, observed, and verified the Panchnama and fulfilled their duties as
Panchas.
13 | P a g e
                19th KSHAN-2024
               MOOT PROPOSITION
(ANNEXURE-3)
14 | P a g e
                19th KSHAN-2024
               MOOT PROPOSITION
15 | P a g e
                19th KSHAN-2024
               MOOT PROPOSITION
(ANNEXURE-4)
16 | P a g e
                19th KSHAN-2024
               MOOT PROPOSITION
17 | P a g e
                19th KSHAN-2024
               MOOT PROPOSITION
18 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                    MOOT PROPOSITION
                                       (ANNEXURE-5)
                              MEMORANDUM PANCHNAMA
Date: 09/10/2023
       In the Crime No. 0547/23 in the offence under Sec.302 I.P.C. We, along with the Police
Officials, the accused , sat in the mobile van bearing No. as MH31CY9987. As told by the
accused, the driver of the vehicle took the road of Tower Line and then continued his vehicle
straight ahead. Opposite A-One General Stores, crossed Godhani Road and went to Zingabai
Takli road to the right, after going a short distance, as told by the accused, turn left on the road
leading to Incredible Park, after a short distance, the accused asked to stop the car, and the
accused, police staff, we and the Panch witnesses got down from the car. And the accused
showed the place on the side of the road where Isha was murdered. As told by the accused, we
came back to Godhani Road on the same road, took a right turn, stopped the vehicle at some
distance on the other side of the road and got down from the vehicle along with all and the
mentioned accused. Then the accused came forward to the vacant plot in front of the police
station and pointed to the place where the knife was thrown on the vacant plot facing A-One
General Stores. At that place, a steel knife was seen lying covered with blood as stated by the
accused in his confessional statement. The following is the description of said knife, after
taking possession of the same and inspecting it before the Panchas.
The description of the knife used in the offense by accused Shlok Chandrakant Dixit aged 24
years is as follows: 1) A sharp knife, stained with blood and having a total length of 24 cm.
Fist length 12 cm., width 2.5 cm. (middle), leaf width 2 cm. (Middle), the total length of the
leaf is 12 cm. Rs 100/- is the total cost of knife.
Boundary of said Memorandum Panchnama site is as to the East of Godhani Road is
approximately 100 feet west of Phoenix Mansion Apartment and to the North is the road
leading towards Mankapur Police Station and to the South is an open vacant plot.
The said Memorandum Panchnama proceedings are completed today dated 09/10/2023 at
16.37 hrs. The said Pancha's read the Panchnama and signed as a Panch Witness.
19 | P a g e
                                      19th KSHAN-2024
                                     MOOT PROPOSITION
                                    (ANNEXURE-6)
                                EXAMINATION OF WEAPON
This is certified for examination of object brought by P.C. Jayant Gaikwad B.N. 2339 P.S.
Mankapur, Dist. Nagpur on date 20/10/23 at 1:20 PM examined by Dr. Robin D’Souza.
Given on dated: 23/10/2023 at 3:00pm. Advice from chemical analysis for stain on knife.
Weapon sealed and handed to P.C. Jayant Gaikwad.
20 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                    MOOT PROPOSITION
                                  (ANNEXURE-7)
                            CHEMICAL ANALYSER REPORT
To,
Police Inspector,
Police Station: Mankapur,
District: Nagpur
Description of Parcel(s):
Five (5) sealed parcels, seal intact and as per copy sent.
Result of Analysis:
   ● Exhibit A1 is stained with blood on blade.
   ● Result of further examination of Exhibit A1 has been given
       separately.
   ● Exhibit B1 and B2 are stained with blood.
   ● Blood detected on Exhibits A1, B1, B3 are of same person i.e. victim
   ● Blood detected on Exhibit C1 is inconclusive as it is both, of human
       as well as of animal.
   ● Blood group of the blood detected on A1 cannot be determined as
       results are inconclusive.
   ● Fingerprints detected on Exhibit A1 are a match with Exhibit C2
21 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
                                   (ANNEXURE-8)
                                POST MORTEM REPORT
warm or cold.
23 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                    MOOT PROPOSITION
24 | P a g e
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
25 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
Date: 07/10/2023
Place: GMC, Nagpur
                                                        Signature:
                                                        Name of M.O.: Dr. Shivani Dandekar
                                                        Designation: Forensic Pathologist
                                                                   SEAL
Received by I.O.
Signature:
Name: Rajdeep Shinde
Rank: PI
P.S.: Mankapur, Nagpur
Date of Collection: 10/10/2023
26 | P a g e
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
                               (ANNEXURE-9)
                       STATEMENT OF MOTHER OF VICTIM
     (The statement is to be considered also as the oral report attached to the FIR )
(PROSECUTION WITNESS - 1)
   ● I Sushma Agnihotri, Age 38 Years, Occupation - Photography, Res. Plot no. 88.
       Shivnagar, Gole Lay Out, Godhani Road, Nagpur.
   ● I live at the above address with my husband Shri Shankar Prasad Agnihotri, age 38
       years, photography, and two daughters namely Isha, aged 20 years, Occupation:
       Education and Reema, aged 17 years Occupation: Education.
   ● My daughter Isha was studying in the first year of her philosophy degree. Similarly,
       she was a professional photographer and a professional Mehendi artist. She had a love
       affair since last 2 years with Shlok, Aged 24 Yrs, R/o Katol Road, Mankapur, Nagpur.
   ● They got married around July 2021 after she turned 18. And since then, they lived
       together for about 8 months. But he kept doubting her and he also had hit her once or
       twice. And there was a constant quarrel between them. Hence, she was staying with us
       for about 1 year.
   ● For the last three days, she was worried sick and didn’t even eat properly. Shlok was
       also harassing our younger daughter Reema by calling her on her mobile and talking
       about Isha. On 04/10/2023 at 05.00 PM. Isha told me that Shlok was constantly putting
       pressure on her to be with her and threatening to kill her if she didn't. Sometime after
       that at 09:30 PM. Isha left home saying that she was going to Sai Mandir to get mehndi
       done in someone's house. And she called me sometime around 11:30 PM. Saying that
       she would return the next morning i.e., on 05/10/2023.
   ● On 05/10/2023 at 05:00 AM. Isha came to our house around 8:00 am., she said that she
       had lost her phone and went to the police station to file a report. She came back home
       in the evening at 07:00 P.M. Along with her was her friend's moped two-wheeler. As
       my younger daughter Reema had a kirtan program in Pune, Isha and I went to railway
       station to drop her off. After Reema departed at around 9:00 P.M. Isha received a call
       on her mobile phone from Shlok, he was asking her to meet after sometime she
       informed me about the same and left to meet him.
27 | P a g e
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
   ● After some time, I called and texted Isha but she didn’t revert back to my calls and
       texts, I got worried about her. So, I called my husband and told him about what is
       bothering me to which my husband said that Isha and Shlok are married after all and
       if they are resolving their issues then what’s the harm in it!. After hearing this I was
       still worried but eventually I stopped calling her and was waiting for her to return.
   ● When Isha didn’t return home for so long, me and my husband got worried and went
       out searching for her. Upon reaching Godhani Road, we found a girl lying on the ground
       in a pool of blood, with the same clothes as Isha’s. We went forward to take a closer
       look and found out that it was our daughter. We panicked and grabbed ourselves to go
       to the police station and registered FIR. My daughter was killed brutally by her husband
       Shlok. He is a danger to our family and hence, he should not be released on bail.
28 | P a g e
                                   19th KSHAN-2024
                                  MOOT PROPOSITION
                                (ANNEXURE-9)
                         STATEMENT OF RISHI RANDHAWA
                             (PROSECUTION WITNESS- 2)
   ● I am Rishi Randhawa, Age: 42, Occu.: Service, R/o Gajanan Nagar, Bajediya,
       Mankapur, Nagpur.
   ● I live at the above address, in a bungalow, outside the Kirana Shop Alley, with my
       wife and 2 children and I generally return home from work at around 9 PM.
   ● After almost half an hour, I heard some noises from the road and went to the balcony
       to see where the noises were coming from. I saw a crowd at a distance from my
       house, i was confused about the event. So, went ahead towards a crowd and saw a
       dead body lying there, surrounded by blood and the Police were investigating over
       there.
   ● After that, one officer asked us if we have seen or heard anything to which, I told
       them that I saw a man who came running from the direction of the incident.
29 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                    MOOT PROPOSITION
                                    (ANNEXURE-10)
                                STATEMENT OF ACCUSED
                                  (DEFENCE WITNESS-1)
● I am Shlok Chandrakant Dixit aged:24 and Occupation: Business, R/o Natraj Nagar, Katol
Road Nagpur.
● I live at the above address with my parents Chandrakant Dixit and Jyoti Dixit.
● Isha and I were in a relationship for 2 years since 2019 and decided to marry each other and
when we became mature, we got married in July 2021.
● We lived together for 8 months after marriage but things didn't work out and eventually both
of us got separated.
● After our separation Isha was living in her paternal home and I didn't try to contact her since
then and neither did she, both of us did not communicate.
● On 05/10/2023 in the evening I went to my Maternal Uncle's home namely Suryakant Thakur
who owns a butcher shop in Khaparkheda and at around 12:30 AM we closed the shop together
and I stayed there itself at his home.
● On 06/10/2023, in the early morning at around 4:30 am, police came to my uncle’s house
and arrested me. Upon asking, they told me that Isha was murdered and her mother has a
suspicion on me.
30 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
                               (ANNEXURE-10)
                        STATEMENT OF UNCLE OF ACCUSED
                                  (DEFENCE WITNESS – 2)
   ● I, Suryakant Thakur, aged 40, operate a butchery business and live near
       the Tehsil Office in Khaparkheda, Nagpur, Maharashtra. Additionally,
       my business is conveniently situated in       the same locality as my
       residence. Shlok Dixit is my Cousin sisters Son that in relation is my
       nephew
31 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
   The accused is prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for committing the murder of Mrs. Isha Dixit aged 20 Years by
assaulting her with knife on her face, neck, shoulder, hands, ribs, chest, etc on 05/10/2023 at
about 10:30 P.M. at Mankapur, Nagpur.
   It is the case of the prosecution that, the victim and the accused used to reside as husband
and wife, and since 1 year prior to the incident the victim, owing to differences with the
accused, had started residing at her parental house and the accused was insisting her to stay
with him and also had suspicion on her character, and as such, on the aforesaid date, time and
place, he assaulted the victim with a knife, resulting in her death, and thereafter her body was
found by her parents and the police went to the spot immediately and prepared spot panchnama
and seized the articles from the spot and found the dead body of the victim, which was sent to
hospital. Subsequently, the father of the victim identified the body and the mother lodged F.I.R.
against the accused and the investigation was carried out.
32 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
                                         REASONS
                               AS TO POINT NO. 1 AND 2
   The prosecution argued that, the case of the prosecution is not solely based on
circumstantial evidence, there is also an eye witness and all the facts and circumstances have
been established which clearly shows that the accused has committed the crime it was also
argued that post mortem report and the weapon examination also supports the case of
prosecution and states that the weapon caused the injuries on the body of the victim which
resulted in her death. So, also there was an injury on the right hand of the accused caused by
the similar weapon. It has been further argued that looking at all the aforesaid circumstances,
the prosecution has established that the accused has committed brutal murder of the deceased
, therefore he may be convicted.
   It was argued by the defence that the accused has been falsely implicated in the present
crime, there is no direct evidence to connect the accused with the said incident and the above-
mentioned eye witness have also not seen anyone clearly. It was further argued that police
personnels have not conducted proper investigation and the memorandum panchnama is
incomplete and vague. It has been further argued that the recovery of the weapon is from the
open space, which is accessible to all. There are no independent witnesses who said anything
about suspicion on the victim or harassment.
33 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
       The defence also argued that in the case of circumstantial evidence, all aspects must
point out toward the guilt of the accused and the entire chain of evidence should be intact.
There is no link established by the prosecution to suggest that the said knife belongs to the
accused. Further, it has been argued that the defence has examined Defence witness -1 (
Suryakant Thakur) , In whose butcher shop the accused used to work and the testimony of this
witness. Supports the fact that the accused was , at the time of the assurance, at his butcher
shop from where his injury was incurred. The prosecution has failed to prove that the injury
of the accused is directly linked with the weapon and incident. The injury to the accused cannot
be the only circumstance to link the accused with the crime. Lastly, it was argued that the
prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt therefore, he
may be acquitted by giving benefit of doubt in interest of justice.
       At the outset it would be apposite to mention that, the present case of the prosecution
is totally based on circumstantial evidence since there is no eye witness. The circumstances
that are sought to be placed on record by the prosecution are as under:
           1. Motive
              (a) Relationship between the accused and the victim
              (b) Their separation
              (c) Suspicion of the accused.
           2. Statements of the Prosecution Witnesses.
              (a) Phone call to Victim.
              (b) Eye Witness
           3. Recovery of knife and clothes, with human blood, under section 27 of the
              Indian Evidence Act.
           4. Injury on the right hand of the accused.
           5. Fingerprints of the accused on the knife
   Before adverting to the aforesaid circumstances and evidence led by the prosecution to
prove the circumstances it would be apposite to mention that, it is not disputed that the victim
died homicidal death. Moreover, the post mortem report prepared by Dr Shivani Dandekar on
07.10.2023, shows that the clothes of the victim were having blood and mud stains and she
also sustained 54 chop and stab injuries. According to the P.M report there was a punctured
wound in the right lung and the external injury Nos.5, 6, 27, 28, and 29 corresponding to the
internal injury were sufficient in ordinary course to cause death. It was also deposed that the
knife, that was said to him along with the query, could cause the said injury. It is therefore
amply clear that the victim was inflicted upon in a series of assaults by knife that caused as
much as 54 injuries. Thus, the death was, no doubt, homicidal.
34 | P a g e
                                     19th KSHAN-2024
                                    MOOT PROPOSITION
   That the statements of witnesses are being corroborated by one another. The motive, the
history between the accused and the victim, further, the recovery of the knife and the possibility
of the knife causing the injuries found on the victim, and the same weapon was recovered from
spot with matching fingerprints of accused, under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, the
accused has shown place where he hid his blood-stained clothes which were recovered by
Police. Furthermore, the non-explanation of circumstances against him under Section 313
statement of the accused creates a chain of circumstances strong enough to conclude that the
possibility of anyone else committing the crime is ruled out. Thus, when memorandum along
with corroborated deposition, recovery panchnama, weapon examination, chemical analysis
report and the postmortem report as well as the failed defence of the accused is taken into
consideration. The totality of circumstances clearly land credence to the fact of culpability of
the accused to the said crime.
    The question that required to be determined, whether the circumstances may be doubted by
the prosecution have been totally proved and whether those circumstances for a complete chain
of circumstances leading to the only inference of guilt of the accused. Hence I find that the
Accused is responsible for killing the victim.
Nagpur
Date: 16/03/2024
                                                                                      (XYZ)
                                                                                 Sessions Judge,
                                                                                      Nagpur
35 | P a g e
                                    19th KSHAN-2024
                                   MOOT PROPOSITION
NOTE:-
   1. The witness statements are taken as per the provisions of sec 161 of Cr.P.C.
   2. The documents in the moot problem are merely annexures.
   3. The accused and his uncle have to be examined as per the provisions of section 315 of
       Cr.P.C.
   4. The defence witness statements are merely a suggestive statement.
   5. That the teams cannot rely on the judgement for the trial rounds.
   6. That the statement of facts are merely a guide so as to set the tone of the story.
Disclaimer:-
All the facts, names, character, etc stated in this moot problem are purely fiction and any
resemblance with any real/ thing/ person is only co- incident and has no effect or relation to
any actual event of the same kind.
36 | P a g e