D44415 (Pages : 2) Reg. No.. FOURTH SEMESTER B.B.A., LL.B. (HONOURS) DEGREE EXAMINATION APRIL 2018 CL 9—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (Syllabus Year 2011) ‘Time : Three Hours Part A Answer any six questions. Each question carries 5 marks. ® 4/Sub-Delegation, 2 Audi Alteram Parte. 3Bstoppell. 4Tokayoktha 0 Droitadministratit 6. Non-application of mind. 7. Kerala Administrative Tribunal. By Costiorari, (6x 5= 80 marks) Part B ° Answer any two questions. Each question carries 10 marks. 1. A complaint was filed by a litigant against a practicing Lawyer, The Bar Council constituted a ‘three member enquiry committee headed by the Chairman. The Chairman, a Senior Advocate of ‘the Bar was once engaged by the litigant in an altogether different ease about 10 years back. The counsel challenged his appointment. Decide. 2. The Government appointed X, overlooking the seniority of ¥ as Chief Secretary of the State, Y * unsuccessfully challenged the cabinet decision before the administrative Tribunal and High Court, Y filed special leave petition before the Supreme Court. State has taken out a contention that itis the policy matter of the Government. Decide, Turn overC 31880 Reg. No.. FOURTH SEMESTER B.B.A., LL.B. (HONOURS) DEGREE EXAMINATION NOVEMBER 2017 CL 8—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (2011 Admissions) : Three Hours ‘Maximum : 75 Marks Part A Answer any six questions. Each question carries 6 marks. Henry VIII Clause. Mandatory Injunction. Habeaus Corpus. Lokpal. Pecuniary Bias. Excessive delegation, Vicarious Liability of State. Substantive ultravires. (6x6 = 80 marks) Part B Answer any two questions. Each question carries 10 marks. A teacher awarded full internal marks to a student who is a close relative of the teacher. Some students wish to challenge the same. Advice, Government by an executive order banned some currency without prior notice. Some public spirited person challenged the same before Supreme Court. Government contented that during exigency Government is justified in banning currency by an executive order. Decide. ‘Mr: Raman was charged with gross dereliction of duty. Government obtained a report from his Superior Officer. During enquiry Raman requested for a copy of the report. The same was denied ‘stating reason confidential. After enquiry Raman was dismissed from service. Whether Raman can successfully challenge the Order of disthissal. ‘Turn overD 44415 (Pages : 2) Name. Reg. No. Ea FOURTH SEMESTER B.B.A., LL.B. (HONOURS) DEGREE EXAMINATION PA PH ew APRIL 2018 CL 9—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (Syllabus Year 2011) ‘Three Hours ‘Maximum : 75 Marks Part A Answer any six questions. Each question carries 5 marks. Sub-Delegation. ‘Audi Alteram Partem, Droit administratiff, Non-application of mind. Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Certiorari. (6 x 5= 30 marks) Part B Answer any two questions. Each question carries 10 marks. A complaint was filed by a litigant against a practicing Lawyer. The Bar Council constituted a three member enquiry committee headed by the Chairman. The Chairman, a Senior Advocate of the Bar was once engaged by the litigant in an altogether different case about 10 years back. The counsel challenged his appointment. Decide. . The Government appointed X, overlooking the seniority of Y as Chief Secretary of the State. ¥ ‘unsuccessfully challenged the cabinet decision before the administrative Tribunal and High Court. Y filed special leave petition before the Supreme Court. State has taken out a contention that itis the policy matter of the Government. Decide. Turn overD 90525 (Pages : 2) Name... Reg. No... FOURTH SEMESTER B.B.A, LL.B. (HONOURS) DEGREE EXAMINATION ‘Time : NOVEMBER 2020 BBA. LLB. CL9—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ‘Three Hours Maximum : 75 Marks Part A Answer any six questions. Each question carries 5 marks. Pecuniary Bias. ‘Acts and Statues. Speaking Order, Quasi-Judicial funetion. Quo warranto. Lokpal. Dicoy’s rule of law. Administrative Tribunal. (Gx 5 = 30 marks) Part B Answer any two questions. Each question carries 10 marks. ‘A doctor by profession also obtained LL.B degree and submitted application for enrolment, Bar ‘Council refused to enroll him as advocate since Advocates Act barring enrolment of a person engaged in any other profession. Doctor challenged the provision. Decide. “Application is invited for the temporary appointment of a Sweeper in a College. The selection board is having three members with Principal as the Chairman. One of the candidates is a distant relative ofthe Principal. Principal did not attend the interview of the particular candidate. Bventually he was selected. Is the procedure legal ? ‘Turn overgh C 63778 (Pages : 2) Nam Time : Three Hours PAM ee ee Reg. No. FOURTH SEMESTER B.B.A.,LL.B. (HONOURS) DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL 2019 BBA, LLB. CL 9—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Maximum : 75 Marks Part A Write short notes on any six of the following. Each question carries § marks. ‘What are the differences between Constitutional Law and Administrative Law ? Briefly state the reasons for the growth of delegated legislation in India. What is Henry VIII clause ? Explain the ingredients of “audi aliteram parte”. What do you mean by sub delegation ? Explain the grounds for issuing writ of mandamus: Write a note on the doctrine of proportionality. Explain the doctrine of promissory estoppel. (G5 = 30 marks) Part B Answer any two questions. Each question carries 10 marks. ‘The government did not grant sanction to prosecute the appellant, who is a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The complainant filed a petition in the High Court and the Hligh Court directed the authorities to grant saction. The appellant was prosecuted and convicted. The appellant approached the Supreme Court on the ground that the authority has acted under dictation, Decide. ‘The State Bar Council framed a rule as to right to practise legal profession and disqualify persons if they were enjoyed in any other occupation. The petitoner who is in the medical profession challenged this and contended that the rule is bad and there is excessive delegation of legislative functions by the legislature. Decide. ‘S,a Government employee travelling in a government vehicle used for families relief work lost his life due to negligence of the driver of the vehicle. A suit was filed by the widow of S. Contention of the State was that the vehicle was engaged in performing sovereign functions and hence action is not maintainable, Will the state succeed ? ‘Turn over