Neuron
Previews
shibirets mutant flies does not affect auto-   about the actual substrates of neuronal                Milosevic, I., Giovedi, S., Lou, X., Raimondi, A.,
                                                                                                      Collesi, C., Shen, H., Paradise, S., O’Toole, E., Fer-
phagosome formation, in spite of the           and synaptic autophagy, and we do not                  guson, S., Cremona, O., and De Camilli, P. (2011).
complete block of endocytosis (Soukup          know the precise fate of synaptic auto-                Neuron 72, 587–601.
et al., 2016). Third, loss of endophilin-A     phagosomes that undergo retrograde
                                                                                                      Murdoch, J.D., Rostosky, C.M., Gowrisankaran,
in mice has no overt effect on the levels      transport to the neuronal soma (Maday                  S., Arora, A.S., Soukup, S.F., Vidal, R., Capece,
of ATG9 or ATG16L proteins (Murdoch            and Holzbaur, 2014). Future studies will               V., Freytag, S., Fischer, A., Verstreken, P., et al.
et al., 2016). Collectively, these results     need to provide answers to these exciting              (2016). Cell Rep. 17, 1071–1086.
support a direct function of endophilin-A      questions.                                             Rubinsztein, D.C., Shpilka, T., and Elazar, Z.
in autophagosome formation indepen-                                                                   (2012). Curr. Biol. 22, R29–R34.
dent of its established role in endocytosis    REFERENCES                                             Soukup, S.F., Kuenen, S., Vanhauwaert, R.,
(Figure 1). As with all exciting new works,                                                           Manetsberger, J., Hernández-Dı́az, S., Swerts,
a number of open questions remain: How         Cajigas, I.J., Will, T., and Schuman, E.M. (2010).     J., Schoovaerts, N., Vilain, S., Gounko, N.V.,
                                               EMBO J. 29, 2746–2752.                                 Vints, K., et al. (2016). Neuron 92, this issue,
exactly is the function of endophilin-A
                                                                                                      829–844.
regulated, and how do LRRK2 and other          Cao, M., Milosevic, I., Giovedi, S., and De Camilli,
factors such as FBXO32/ FOXO3A sense           P. (2014). J. Neurosci. 34, 16544–16549.               Tian, Y., Chang, J.C., Fan, E.Y., Flajolet, M., and
                                                                                                      Greengard, P. (2013). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
neuronal activity? What physiological                                                                 110, 17071–17076.
                                               Kjaerulff, O., Brodin, L., and Jung, A. (2011). Cell
mechanisms define the switch between           Biochem. Biophys. 60, 137–154.
the functions of endophilin-A in endocy-                                                              Uytterhoeven, V., Lauwers, E., Maes, I., Miskie-
                                               Maday, S., and Holzbaur, E.L. (2014). Dev. Cell 30,    wicz, K., Melo, M.N., Swerts, J., Kuenen, S., Wit-
tosis and in autophagy? Which partner          71–85.                                                 tocx, R., Corthout, N., Marrink, S.J., et al. (2015).
proteins associate with endophilin-A in                                                               Neuron 88, 735–748.
autophagy, and which membranes are             Matta, S., Van Kolen, K., da Cunha, R., van den Bo-
                                               gaart, G., Mandemakers, W., Miskiewicz, K., De         Verstreken, P., Kjaerulff, O., Lloyd, T.E., Atkinson,
the substrates for autophagosome forma-        Bock, P.J., Morais, V.A., Vilain, S., Haddad, D.,      R., Zhou, Y., Meinertzhagen, I.A., and Bellen, H.J.
tion at synapses? Finally, we know little      et al. (2012). Neuron 75, 1008–1021.                   (2002). Cell 109, 101–112.
Cut Your Losses:
Spastin Mediates Branch-Specific Axon Loss
Hagar Meltzer1 and Oren Schuldiner1,*
1Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Sciences, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
*Correspondence: oren.schuldiner@weizmann.ac.il
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.004
In this issue of Neuron, Brill et al. (2016) demonstrate that, during synapse elimination in the developing
neuromuscular junction, branch-specific microtubule destabilization results in arrested axonal transport
and induces axon branch loss. This process is mediated in part by the neurodegeneration-associated, micro-
tubule-severing protein spastin.
Developmental neuronal remodeling is           tral and peripheral nervous systems of                 Purves and Lichtman, 1980). When the
crucial for sculpting the mature nervous       both vertebrates and invertebrates. In                 mammalian NMJ initially forms, several
system. In mammals, neuronal remodel-          addition to its developmental signifi-                 axon branches originating from different
ing is largely timed to postnatal develop-     cance, understanding the molecular basis               motor neurons converge to a single syn-
ment and serves to refine neural circuits      of axon pruning may shed light on the                  aptic site on the muscle, which is at this
that were formed during the embryonic          resembling process of axon degeneration                stage poly-innervated. However, during
period, often by eliminating exuberant         during certain ‘‘dying-back’’ neurodegen-              the early postnatal period, extensive
connections. This may include pruning of       erative diseases (Luo and O’Leary, 2005;               axon pruning takes place until only a sin-
individual axonal projections while the        Yaron and Schuldiner, 2016).                           gle axon branch remains. This synaptic
cell body, and in some cases sister axonal        One of the first neural structures in               elimination is based on ongoing competi-
projections, remains intact. Axon pruning      which axon pruning was demonstrated                    tion between axon branches, in which the
is a widespread phenomenon and has             to be essential for establishing proper wir-           ‘‘winning’’ branch gradually expands its
been demonstrated throughout the cen-          ing is the neuromuscular junction (NMJ;                territory at the expanse of the ‘‘losing’’
                                                                                      Neuron 92, November 23, 2016 ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. 677
                                                                                                                                      Neuron
                                                                                                                  Previews
Figure 1. A Schematic Illustration of the Developing Neuromuscular Junction
Spastin mediates microtubule destabilization and axon branch dismantling.
branch, eventually leading to complete              nerve-muscle explants at extremely high          et al. (2016), however, demonstrated
retraction of the latter (Walsh and Licht-          resolution. The sequential photo-bleach-         transport arrest in the dismantling, losing
man, 2003). It is crucial to note that the          ing method, which they have previously           axon branches. By tracing labeled mito-
outcome of each such ‘‘battle’’ is branch           optimized, permits non-invasive time-            chondria and peroxisomes, they estab-
specific, as various axon branches origi-           lapse visualization of a single axon branch      lished absence of both anterograde and
nating from a single motor neuron can               at its neuromuscular synaptic site. This         retrograde transport in retreating axon
simultaneously expand or retract at                 allows determination of the fraction of          branches (which they defined as occu-
different NMJs along the muscle. In other           the postsynaptic territory occupied by           pying 40% or less of the synaptic terri-
words, at a single time point, all stages of        each axon branch—a reliable predictor            tory), as opposed to stable bi-directional
the competition may coexist within one              of the synaptic competition outcome              trafficking in the growing or competing
motor unit. Despite our thorough under-             (i.e., a branch that occupies the majority       (i.e., occupying between 40%–60% of
standing of the temporal and spatial order          of the postsynaptic site at a given time         the synaptic territory) branches. Impor-
of events during synapse elimination in             point will most likely be the ‘‘winner’’;        tantly, this argues against the ‘‘evacua-
the remodeling NMJ, little is known about           Walsh and Lichtman, 2003). Moreover,             tion’’ model, but rather supports the ‘‘axo-
the molecular mechanisms that govern                using time-lapse imaging, the system en-         some shedding’’ model, in which axon
its regulation and execution, especially            ables tracing of microtubule dynamics as         branches are locally dismantled along
regarding the manner by which branch                well as evaluation of the directionality and     with their content, thus shedding mem-
specificity is achieved. The elegantly de-          rate of axonal transport.                        brane-bound remnants that contain a
signed study by Brill et al. (2016), pub-              In this study, Brill et al. (2016) begin by   high density of axonal organelles, which
lished in this issue of Neuron, takes an            testing the hypothesis that subcellular          are later engulfed and degraded by neigh-
important step toward delineating the               structures are evacuated from axon               boring Schwann cells (Bishop et al.,
molecular basis of NMJ remodeling by                branches prior to pruning. This theory           2004).
identifying a key role for spastin-medi-            was suggested in the original model of              Naturally, the arrest in axonal transport
ated, branch-specific microtubule desta-            NMJ synapse elimination (Riley, 1981)            directed Brill et al. (2016) toward the po-
bilization during synapse elimination               and was reinforced by a more recent pa-          tential role of the microtubular cytoskel-
(Figure 1).                                         per that demonstrated retrograde trans-          eton in the process, as it comprises the
   Brill et al. (2016) developed a unique           port of pre-synaptic vesicles along axonal       tracts on which axonal transport takes
system that allows studying of the devel-           microtubular tracts during remodeling of         place. The involvement of microtubules
oping mammalian NMJ in postnatal                    the Drosophila NMJ (Liu et al., 2010). Brill     in synapse competition and elimination
678 Neuron 92, November 23, 2016
Neuron
Previews
was verified by a series of immunostain-       destabilization in vivo arises. Microtu-        microtubule polyglutamylation (Zempel
ings, which demonstrated a specific            bules are known to be subjected to a vari-      et al., 2013). Brill et al. (2016), however,
decrease in tubulin intensity that corre-      ety of post-translational modifications,        found decreased, rather than increased,
lated with reduction in synaptic territory     some of which are shown to be associ-           polyglutamylation in retreating axon
of the axon branches. In addition, retreat-    ated with changes in stability (Janke and       branches, in which spastin is supposedly
ing branches displayed a higher density of     Bulinski, 2011). As expected, the retreat-      more active, compared to the highly
EB3 ‘‘comets,’’ demarcating dynamic            ing branches displayed a high glutamy-          polyglutamylated winning branches. This
plus-end microtubule tips. Together with       lated/tyrosinated a-tubulin ratio, typical      potential lack of congruence could be
the selective reduction in microtubular        of hyper-dynamic microtubules, accom-           resolved if one assumes that poly-
mass, this finding is indicative of fragmen-   panied by decreased polyglutamylation.          glutamylated microtubules in the losing
tation and destabilization of the microtu-     Due to the surprising lack of evidence for      branch are severed by spastin. Indeed,
bular cytoskeleton and was evident in          the action of deacetylases (as deacetyla-       Brill et al. (2016) provide evidence to sup-
the retreating axon branches, but not in       tion is the most consistent microtubule         port this hypothesis by demonstrating
the growing ones. Furthermore, while           modification linked to instability; Janke       that, in spastin knockout mice, a promi-
EB3 comet density was equally high in          and Bulinski, 2011), Brill et al. (2016)        nent increase in polyglutamylation is
the proximal and distal areas of a given       searched for an alternative mediator of         observed, especially in the retreating
branch, it was significantly lower in the      the local destabilization effects. They         axon branches. Evidently, further work is
stem axon of that branch (in which it did      turned to spastin, one of several micro-        warranted in order to delineate the pre-
not differ from that of stem axons of win-     tubule-severing enzymes and, as such,           cise regulation of microtubule polygluta-
ning branches). This indicates that micro-     predicted to induce an increase in the          mylation in vivo. In this context, examining
tubule destabilization is a highly compart-    number of microtubule ends as well as           the potential involvement of other post-
mentalized event, which does not extend        microtubule loss. In a new spastin              translational modifications, some of
beyond the branch point of a retreating        knockout mouse that they generated, Brill       which were highlighted in this study
axon. This branch specificity is in accor-     et al. (2016) demonstrated that while the       (such a tyrosination), could provide addi-
dance with the coexistence of losing and       initial development of the NMJ did not          tional insight into the regulation of spastin.
winning branches within a single neuron,       seem to be affected, synapse elimination        Furthermore, spastin is not the only
as earlier described. Careful time-course      was defective and resulted in persistence       microtubule-severing protein, and it might
analysis established destabilization of        of doubly innervated NMJs, similar to           be interesting to investigate whether other
the microtubules in the losing branches,       the effect observed following epothilone        such proteins, namely katanin and fidge-
ruling out the alternative option in which     treatment. The spastin mutants also dis-        tin, also play a role in branch-specific
microtubules were being stabilized in all      played a drastic decrease in the rate of        microtubule destabilization.
branches excluding the losing one. The         retraction bulb shortening. Lastly, Brill          Taken together, Brill et al. (2016) pro-
profound loss of microtubular tracts in re-    et al. (2016) generated a conditional           vide important insight into unresolved
treating branches was further validated by     knockout mouse model that selectively           questions regarding the molecular mech-
reconstruction of a subset of the NMJs         lacks spastin in cholinergic neurons. This      anisms that underlie NMJ development
using correlated electron microscopy.          mutant line displayed a similar delay in        in particular and neuronal remodeling in
   If microtubule destabilization induces      synapse elimination, establishing that          general. Furthermore, their identifica-
dismantling of the losing axon branch,         spastin activity was cell autonomously          tion of spastin as a mediator of branch-
then pharmacological stabilization of the      required within the motor neurons.              specific microtubule destabilization is
microtubular cytoskeleton is expected to          The microtubule stabilization effects        exciting, especially in light of its role
interfere with the normal progression of       displayed by spastin mutants seemed to          in hereditary spastic paraplegia and other
synapse elimination. Indeed, the use of        manifest as a weaker version of those           neurodegenerative diseases (Errico et al.,
the microtubule-stabilizing drug epothi-       induced by epothilone treatment, with           2002). It is intriguing to mention that one of
lone resulted in a significant delay in syn-   winning branches less affected than             the most affected axon projections in
apse elimination, manifested by the            losing ones. This finding might suggest         hereditary spastic paraplegia is the corti-
persistence of doubly innervated NMJs          that spastin activity is tightly regulated in   cospinal tract, which is another classical
as late as postnatal day 21. Accordingly,      a branch-specific manner. Indeed, one           example for branch-specific neuronal re-
following epothilone treatment, both the       of the most important questions that            modeling (Luo and O’Leary, 2005).
losing and winning branches displayed          arises from this study relates to the regu-        It comes as no surprise that microtubule
increased tubulin content and reduced          lation of spastin—namely, how is spastin        fragmentation plays a role in axon dis-
EB3 comet density. Furthermore, the            selectively directed to its target site,        mantling, as microtubules constitute a
treatment seemed to restore organelle          enabling the highly defined compartmen-         major part of the axon cytoskeleton. In
transport in the retreating branches.          talization of retreating branches. Is the       fact, it is well appreciated that microtu-
   Since branch-specific destabilization of    regulation achieved due to a post-transla-      bule disruption is one of the first and
the microtubular cytoskeleton seems to         tional modification of spastin itself or        essential steps during axon and dendrite
drive axon branch dismantling, the ques-       rather by microtubule modifications or          pruning in Drosophila, preceding mor-
tion of what is the molecular mechanism        both? Previous studies demonstrated             phological disruption of the neurites
that drives branch-specific microtubule        recruitment of spastin to its target site by    (Yu and Schuldiner, 2014). Nevertheless,
                                                                                                     Neuron 92, November 23, 2016 679
                                                                                                                                                     Neuron
                                                                                                                            Previews
identifying microtubules as the seemingly           Minerva Foundation, and the European Research            Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, D., Wang, S., and Zhang,
                                                    Council (erc CoG). O.S. is an incumbent of the           Y.Q. (2010). J. Neurosci. 30, 11624–11634.
causative force of this process is an
                                                    Rothstein Career Development Chair of Genetic
intriguing finding with potentially impor-          Diseases.                                                Luo, L., and O’Leary, D.D. (2005). Annu. Rev. Neu-
tant clinical implications. Much effort is                                                                   rosci. 28, 127–156.
focused on the use of microtubule stabili-
zation compounds (such as epothilone) as            REFERENCES                                               Purves, D., and Lichtman, J.W. (1980). Science
therapeutic agents for a variety of neuro-                                                                   210, 153–157.
logical conditions. The findings demon-             Bareyre, F.M., Kerschensteiner, M., Raineteau, O.,
                                                    Mettenleiter, T.C., Weinmann, O., and Schwab,            Riley, D.A. (1981). J. Neurocytol. 10, 425–440.
strated by Brill et al. (2016) warrant careful,     M.E. (2004). Nat. Neurosci. 7, 269–277.
context-dependent consideration of their
                                                    Bishop, D.L., Misgeld, T., Walsh, M.K., Gan, W.B.,       Walsh, M.K., and Lichtman, J.W. (2003). Neuron
use, as physiological microtubule destabi-          and Lichtman, J.W. (2004). Neuron 44, 651–661.           37, 67–73.
lization might contribute to compensatory
plasticity, which might be important in             Brill, M.S., Kleele, T., Ruschkies, L., Wang, M.,        Yaron, A., and Schuldiner, O. (2016). Curr. Biol. 26,
                                                    Marahori, N.A., Reuter, M.S., Hausrat, T.J., Wei-        R628–R639.
neural repair following neurological injury         gand, E., Fisher, M., Ahles, A., et al. (2016). Neuron
or during disease (Bareyre et al., 2004).           92, S0896-6273(16)30654-7.
                                                                                                             Yu, F., and Schuldiner, O. (2014). Curr. Opin. Neu-
                                                                                                             robiol. 27, 192–198.
                                                    Errico, A., Ballabio, A., and Rugarli, E.I. (2002).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                                                    Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 153–163.
                                                                                                             Zempel, H., Luedtke, J., Kumar, Y., Biernat, J.,
Work in our laboratory is mainly funded by grants   Janke, C., and Bulinski, J.C. (2011). Nat. Rev. Mol.     Dawson, H., Mandelkow, E., and Mandelkow,
from the Israeli Science Foundation (ISF), the      Cell Biol. 12, 773–786.                                  E.M. (2013). EMBO J. 32, 2920–2937.
680 Neuron 92, November 23, 2016