Ipr 2 - Q&a
Ipr 2 - Q&a
• Definition:
o Copyright is a legal concept enacted by most governments to grant the creator of original
work exclusive rights to its use and distribution, usually for a limited time. In India,
copyright is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957.
o Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines copyright as the exclusive right to do or
authorize others to do certain acts in relation to:
▪ Literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works.
▪ Cinematograph films and sound recordings.
• Nature of Copyright:
o Exclusive Rights:
▪ The copyright holder has the exclusive right to reproduce, publish, perform, and
communicate the work to the public, as well as to make adaptations and
translations.
▪ Example: Only the copyright owner can authorize someone to publish their novel.
o Automatic Protection:
▪ Under Indian law, copyright protection is automatic, and the creator does not need
to register the work for it to be protected (Section 13 of the Act).
▪ Example: A painter automatically owns the copyright of their painting once it is
created.
o Territorial Rights:
▪ Copyright is territorial, meaning it applies within the jurisdiction of the country
where it is granted. However, international agreements like the Berne Convention
allow for protection across multiple countries.
o Moral Rights:
▪ Moral rights are personal rights granted to authors, regardless of their economic
rights. These include the right to claim authorship of the work and the right to
object to any derogatory treatment of the work (Section 57 of the Act).
▪ Example: An author can object to any modifications of their work that could harm
their reputation.
o Duration of Copyright:
▪ The duration of copyright in India varies based on the type of work:
▪ Literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works: Life of the author plus 60
years after their death (Section 22).
▪ Cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, and works of
corporate authorship: 60 years from the date of publication.
• Economic Rights vs. Moral Rights:
o Economic Rights: These are the rights that allow the copyright owner to derive financial
benefits from the use of their work by others.
o Moral Rights: These protect the personal connection between the creator and the work.
• Meaning:
o Copyright encompasses a collection of exclusive rights granted to the creator or author
of an original work. These rights are often referred to as a "bundle of rights" because they
are multiple rights combined under one title.
o Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 outlines these rights in relation to different types
of works.
• Key Rights Included:
o Right to Reproduce the Work:
▪ The copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce the work in any material
form, including the storing of it in any medium by electronic means.
▪ Example: A writer can decide who may publish copies of their book.
o Right to Issue Copies to the Public:
▪ The right to issue copies of the work to the public, including distribution, sale, or
rental.
▪ Example: A filmmaker can control the distribution of DVDs of their film.
o Right to Perform the Work in Public:
▪ The right to perform the work or communicate it to the public.
▪ Example: A musician has the right to control who performs their song in public.
o Right to Make Translations and Adaptations:
▪ The right to make any translations, adaptations, or arrangements of the work.
▪ Example: An author can authorize or prevent translations of their novel into other
languages.
o Right to Broadcast the Work:
▪ The right to broadcast the work or communicate it to the public by way of a radio,
television, or satellite.
▪ Example: A sound recording owner can decide how their music is played on the
radio.
o Right of Paternity and Integrity (Moral Rights):
▪ The right to be identified as the author of the work (Right of Paternity) and the
right to object to any derogatory treatment that could harm the author's reputation
(Right of Integrity).
• Significance:
o This "bundle of rights" allows the copyright holder to control how their work is used,
ensuring they receive recognition and financial compensation for their creative efforts.
• Historical Background:
o The concept of copyright has evolved over centuries, originating in Europe during the
15th and 16th centuries with the advent of the printing press. It began as a means to
control the reproduction of printed materials.
o Statute of Anne (1709): The first formal copyright law, passed in England, granted
authors the exclusive right to their works for a limited period.
• Development in India:
o British Influence:
▪ Indian copyright law was heavily influenced by British law. The first Indian
Copyright Act was the Indian Copyright Act of 1914, which was based on the UK
Copyright Act of 1911.
o Post-Independence:
▪ The Copyright Act of 1957: After independence, India enacted its own copyright
law, which is the principal legislation governing copyright in India today.
▪ This Act has been amended several times to address new challenges and
technological advancements, with major amendments in 1983, 1984, 1992, 1994,
1999, and 2012.
o International Conventions:
▪ India is a signatory to various international conventions and treaties like the Berne
Convention, Universal Copyright Convention, and the Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. These have shaped the
development of copyright law in India.
• Modern Developments:
o Digital Era: The rise of the internet and digital technology has posed new challenges to
copyright enforcement, leading to amendments in the law to address issues like digital
piracy and the protection of electronic works.
o 2012 Amendment: One of the significant amendments was in 2012, which included
provisions for protecting the rights of performers, and for the first time, addressed issues
related to digital rights management (DRM) and technological protection measures.
• Current Scenario:
o Today, copyright law in India is comprehensive and covers a wide range of works
including literary, musical, dramatic, and artistic works, cinematograph films, and sound
recordings. The law continues to evolve to address emerging challenges in the digital age.
• Assignment of Copyright:
o Definition:
▪ Assignment refers to the transfer of ownership of the copyright from the original
creator to another person or entity. This transfer can be either full or partial,
depending on the terms agreed upon.
o Section 18 of the Copyright Act, 1957:
▪ This section permits the copyright holder to assign their copyright, either wholly
or partially, to any other person. The assignment must be in writing and signed by
the assignor.
o Requirements:
▪ The assignment must specify the rights being transferred, the duration of the
assignment, and the territorial extent of the assignment.
▪ Example: An author assigning the rights of publishing a book to a publishing
house.
o Effect of Assignment:
▪ Once assigned, the assignee has the exclusive rights to the work, as specified in
the assignment agreement. The assignor loses those rights, except any that were
explicitly retained.
▪ Example: If an author assigns the rights to publish a book to a publisher, only the
publisher can publish the book during the assignment period.
• Licensing of Copyright:
o Definition:
▪ Licensing refers to the grant of permission by the copyright holder to another
person to use the copyrighted work in a specific manner. Unlike assignment,
licensing does not transfer ownership.
o Types of Licenses:
▪ Exclusive License (Section 30):
▪ An exclusive license is a license in which the copyright owner grants all
the rights to the licensee, and the owner cannot grant the same rights to
anyone else.
▪ Example: A filmmaker grants exclusive rights to a streaming platform to
distribute their film.
▪ Non-Exclusive License:
▪ In a non-exclusive license, the copyright owner retains the right to grant
the same rights to others.
▪ Example: A musician grants non-exclusive licenses to multiple radio
stations to play their songs.
▪ Compulsory License:
▪ This is a license granted without the copyright owner's consent under
specific circumstances provided by the law. For example, a compulsory
license may be issued for the production of certain works for educational
purposes.
▪ Example: A government may issue a compulsory license for a book to be
translated into a local language for educational purposes.
• Legal Requirements:
o Licensing agreements must be in writing and signed by the licensor and licensee. The
scope, duration, and territorial extent of the license should be clearly defined.
• Importance:
o Assignment and licensing are crucial mechanisms that allow copyright holders to
commercially exploit their works and ensure their works reach a wider audience.
5. What are the qualifying elements to be in existence in a work for its copyright ability?
• Originality:
o The work must be original, meaning it should originate from the author and involve a
certain degree of creativity or intellectual effort. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957,
mandates that the work should not be a mere copy of an existing work.
o Example: A new novel written by an author is original, whereas a copied manuscript is
not.
• Fixation:
o The work must be fixed in a tangible form, such as being written, recorded, or stored
electronically. Ideas, concepts, or facts that are not fixed in a tangible medium are not
eligible for copyright protection.
o Example: A poem written on paper or stored on a computer is fixed, but a spoken
conversation that is not recorded is not.
• Expression:
o Copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves. The way in which
an idea is expressed, whether in writing, art, music, or other forms, is what qualifies for
copyright protection.
o Example: The storyline of a novel is protected, but the basic idea or theme of the novel
is not.
• Work of Author:
o The work must be created by a human author, as copyright does not protect works created
by machines or animals.
o Example: A painting created by an artist is protected, but a design created solely by a
computer algorithm without human intervention is not.
• Sufficient Creativity:
o The work must exhibit a minimum level of creativity. It should be more than a trivial or
mechanical exercise. The creativity need not be groundbreaking, but there should be
some element of creativity involved.
o Example: A photograph taken with creative framing and lighting is protected, but a
simple snapshot without any creative effort may not be.
• Not a Work in Public Domain:
o The work must not already be in the public domain. Works that are no longer protected
by copyright, or were never eligible for copyright protection, cannot be copyrighted.
o Example: Classic works like Shakespeare's plays are in the public domain and cannot be
copyrighted.
The Copyright Act, 1957, under Section 16, outlines certain types of works in which copyright does
not subsist:
• Definition:
o Computer software, under the Copyright Act, 1957, is categorized as a "literary work"
and is therefore eligible for copyright protection.
o This includes the source code and object code of the software.
• Protection Under the Act:
o Section 2(o) of the Act defines literary works to include computer programs, tables, and
compilations, including computer databases.
o Copyright protection for software covers the expression of the idea, not the underlying
idea itself.
• Rights of the Author:
o The author of the software (usually the programmer or the company employing the
programmer) has the exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, and distribute the software.
o These rights also include making derivative works, translating the software, and
distributing it to the public.
• Infringement:
o Copying software without authorization, whether for personal use or distribution,
constitutes copyright infringement.
o The Act provides civil and criminal remedies for such infringement.
• Licensing:
o Software can be licensed to others, either exclusively or non-exclusively, allowing the
licensee to use the software under specified conditions.
o Licensing agreements are crucial for defining how software can be used, distributed, or
modified.
• Protection Duration:
o The copyright protection for software lasts for the lifetime of the author plus 60 years
after their death.
A compulsory license in the context of copyright refers to a situation where a government authority
grants permission to a third party to use a copyrighted work without the consent of the copyright
owner. This mechanism is typically employed to balance the interests of the copyright owner with the
public interest, ensuring that essential works are accessible to the public under certain circumstances.
In India, the provisions for compulsory licenses are provided under the Copyright Act, 1957. Sections
31 to 31D of the Act deal with various situations where a compulsory license can be granted. The
purpose of these provisions is to prevent the abuse of copyright and to ensure the work's availability to
the public.
• Application:
o An interested party must file an application with the Copyright Board, specifying the
reasons for seeking the license.
• Hearing:
o The Copyright Board conducts a hearing, providing an opportunity for both the
applicant and the copyright owner to present their cases.
• Terms and Conditions:
o If granted, the Board determines the terms and conditions of the compulsory license,
including the duration and the amount of royalty to be paid to the copyright owner.
Conclusion: Compulsory licenses are a significant tool to ensure that copyright does not become a
barrier to the dissemination of knowledge, cultural works, and essential resources. They serve as a
check on the monopoly of copyright owners, ensuring that public interest is upheld in certain
circumstances. However, these licenses are granted under strict conditions to prevent misuse and to
balance the interests of both the copyright owner and the public.
### 10B. Who will grant the compulsory license and when it can be revoked?
• Copyright Board:
o The Copyright Board (now succeeded by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board
(IPAB)) is the primary authority responsible for granting compulsory licenses in India.
o The Board/Tribunal examines applications for compulsory licenses and determines
whether the conditions for granting such a license are met, as laid out in the Copyright
Act, 1957.
o The Board is empowered to impose terms and conditions, including the amount of royalty
to be paid to the copyright owner, and to whom the license is to be granted.
• Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB):
o Following the establishment of the IPAB, the functions of the Copyright Board, including
the granting of compulsory licenses, were transferred to this tribunal. The IPAB handles
disputes related to intellectual property rights, including copyright.
o The Board's decision is based on factors such as the public interest, the availability of the
work, and the terms of the license requested.
• Non-Availability of Work:
o When a copyrighted work is not made available to the public or is being withheld by the
copyright owner, particularly if such withholding is against public interest.
• Educational and Research Purposes:
o When a copyrighted work, particularly translations or adaptations, is needed for
educational purposes, and the copyright owner has not granted the necessary permissions.
• Public Broadcasting:
o Broadcasting organizations may obtain compulsory licenses to broadcast sound
recordings by paying royalties determined by the Board.
• Benefit of Disabled Persons:
o Licenses may be granted to make works accessible to disabled persons, such as producing
copies in Braille, if these formats are not available.
Revocation of Compulsory License
Conclusion: The grant and revocation of compulsory licenses are crucial mechanisms in the copyright
system to balance the rights of the copyright owner with public interest. The Copyright Board or IPAB,
as the competent authority, ensures that compulsory licenses are granted and revoked based on fair and
just criteria, maintaining the integrity of the copyright system while ensuring accessibility of works to
the public.
• Types of Licenses:
o Copyright licenses can be exclusive or non-exclusive, allowing licensees to use the
copyrighted work under specific conditions set by the licensor.
o Licenses can be granted for a limited period or for the entire term of the copyright.
• Grounds for Termination:
o Breach of Terms: A license can be terminated if the licensee violates the terms and
conditions of the agreement, such as failing to pay royalties or using the work beyond
the scope of the license.
o Expiry: Licenses granted for a specific duration automatically terminate upon the
expiry of that period.
o Mutual Agreement: The licensor and licensee can agree to terminate the license at any
time, subject to the terms of the contract.
o Revocation by the Copyright Board/IPAB: The Board/IPAB can revoke a license if it
was granted under a compulsory license and the licensee fails to adhere to the imposed
conditions.
• Consequences of Termination:
o Upon termination, the licensee loses all rights to use the copyrighted work, and any
further use may constitute copyright infringement.
o The licensor may seek legal remedies for any unauthorized use post-termination.
• Substantial Similarity:
o For an infringement claim, the plaintiff must prove that the alleged infringing work is
substantially similar to the copyrighted work.
o Substantial similarity is assessed in terms of expression, and not just ideas, themes, or
concepts.
• Access to the Original Work:
o Proof that the alleged infringer had access to the copyrighted work can strengthen an
infringement claim.
o Direct or indirect access may be considered by the court to determine whether the
infringer copied the work.
• Copying or Unauthorized Use:
o Any reproduction, adaptation, distribution, performance, or display of the copyrighted
work without permission constitutes infringement.
o Copying does not necessarily have to be identical but must be enough to capture the
essence of the original work.
• Intent:
o While copyright infringement is generally a strict liability offense, evidence of intent or
knowledge of copying can influence the severity of penalties.
o Innocent infringement may result in reduced damages, but it is still actionable.
• Injunction:
o The court may issue an injunction to prevent the infringer from continuing to use the
copyrighted work.
o This is a common remedy to stop ongoing or future infringement.
• Damages:
o The copyright owner may be awarded monetary damages for losses suffered due to the
infringement.
o Damages can be compensatory, covering actual losses, or statutory, where a
predetermined amount is awarded.
• Account of Profits:
o Instead of or in addition to damages, the copyright owner may seek an account of
profits, where the infringer must pay the profits earned from the infringing activity.
• Delivery Up:
o The court may order the infringer to deliver up all infringing copies or materials used to
produce infringing copies for destruction.
• Criminal Penalties:
o In cases of willful infringement, criminal penalties such as fines and imprisonment may
be imposed under the Copyright Act, 1957.
• Reproduction Right:
o The copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce the work in any material
form, including storage in any medium by electronic means.
o This includes photocopying, digitization, and reproduction in different formats.
• Right of Communication to the Public:
o The owner has the right to communicate the work to the public, including broadcasting,
performance, or making the work available on the internet.
o This right is crucial in the digital age for controlling the distribution of works online.
• Adaptation and Translation Rights:
o The copyright owner can authorize others to create adaptations, such as film adaptations
of a novel or translations into other languages.
o These rights are essential for expanding the work's reach to different audiences.
• Right to Distribute:
o The owner has the right to distribute copies of the work, including through sale, rental,
lease, or lending.
o This right helps control the commercial exploitation of the work.
• Right to License:
o The copyright owner can license the work to third parties for use, including exclusive
and non-exclusive licenses.
o Licensing allows the owner to monetize the work by granting permission to others for
its use.
• Moral Rights:
o The copyright owner has moral rights, including the right to be identified as the author
(right of paternity) and the right to object to derogatory treatment of the work (right of
integrity).
o These rights protect the personal connection between the author and the work.
• Right of Public Performance:
o The owner can control and authorize the public performance of the work, such as
staging a play or performing a musical piece in public.
o This right is crucial for creators in the performing arts.
• Right to Seek Legal Remedies:
o The copyright owner can seek legal remedies against infringement, including
injunctions, damages, and criminal penalties.
o This right ensures the protection and enforcement of copyright.
• Right to Resale Royalty:
o In some jurisdictions, the copyright owner may have the right to receive a royalty on the
resale of certain works, such as artworks, under the resale royalty right or "droit de
suite."
• Definition:
o Under the Designs Act, 2000, a design is defined as the "features of shape,
configuration, pattern, ornament, or composition of lines or colors applied to any
article, whether in two-dimensional or three-dimensional form."
o The design must be new or original, and it should be capable of being applied to an
article by any industrial process.
o The design should not be purely functional but must provide an aesthetic appearance to
the article.
• Key Aspects:
o Shape and Configuration: Refers to the form or structure of an article.
o Pattern and Ornament: Involves decorative elements applied to the surface of the
article.
o Application: The design must be applicable to an article, enhancing its visual appeal
and not just serving a functional purpose.
• Industrial Application:
o The design should be applicable to articles that are manufactured or produced by an
industrial process, which means it should be capable of being mass-produced.
17. Discuss the Salient Features of the Designs Act, 2000 and the Features of the
Designs Act, 1911
• Objective:
o The Act aims to protect the visual design of articles, providing legal protection to the
aesthetic aspect of a product, thereby encouraging innovation and creativity.
• Definition of Design:
o As per the Act, a design is defined broadly to include features of shape, configuration,
pattern, ornament, or composition of lines or colors applied to an article.
• Registration:
o Design registration provides exclusive rights to the creator, preventing others from
using the design without permission.
o The process of registration is streamlined, with clear procedures for filing, examination,
and publication.
• Term of Protection:
o The initial term of protection is 10 years from the date of registration, which can be
renewed for an additional 5 years, making a total of 15 years.
• Powers of Controller:
o The Controller of Designs has the authority to examine applications, grant or refuse
registration, and enforce compliance with the Act.
• Infringement and Remedies:
o The Act provides remedies for infringement, including injunctions and damages.
• International Conventions:
o The Act aligns with international agreements such as the Paris Convention for the
Protection of Industrial Property, ensuring global recognition of Indian designs.
• Objective:
o The earlier Act focused on protecting designs but was less comprehensive compared to
the 2000 Act.
• Scope:
o The scope of design protection was narrower, with less emphasis on industrial
application and more on aesthetic aspects.
• Term of Protection:
o The protection under the 1911 Act was initially for 5 years, with possible extensions up
to 15 years, which was less favorable compared to the 2000 Act.
• Registration Process:
o The process was more cumbersome, with less clarity on the procedures for examination
and registration.
• Amendments:
o The 2000 Act replaced the 1911 Act to address emerging needs and align with
international standards, providing broader protection and clearer guidelines.
18. Powers and Functions of the Controller Under the Designs Act, 2000
• Examination of Applications:
o The Controller examines design applications to ensure they meet the requirements for
registration, including novelty, originality, and industrial applicability.
• Granting or Refusing Registration:
o Based on the examination, the Controller can grant or refuse registration of a design.
This decision is made after evaluating the design's compliance with legal standards.
• Publication of Registered Designs:
o The Controller is responsible for publishing registered designs in the official gazette,
making the information available to the public and establishing the design's legal status.
• Maintaining the Register:
o The Controller maintains a register of designs, which includes details of all registered
designs, changes, and renewals.
• Enforcement of Compliance:
o The Controller ensures compliance with the provisions of the Designs Act, addressing
issues related to unauthorized use and infringement.
• Hearing Appeals:
o The Controller hears appeals against decisions related to design registration and other
disputes arising under the Act.
• Economic Value:
o Designs play a crucial role in enhancing the aesthetic appeal of products, influencing
consumer preferences, and adding economic value to goods.
• Competitive Advantage:
o A unique and attractive design provides a competitive edge in the market,
distinguishing products from competitors and potentially increasing market share.
• Brand Identity:
o Design contributes to brand identity and recognition, making products more memorable
and appealing to consumers.
• Encouraging Innovation:
o Protection of design rights encourages creativity and innovation by ensuring that
designers can reap the rewards of their inventive work.
• Legal Protection:
o Design registration provides legal protection against unauthorized copying, ensuring
that the designer’s rights are upheld and their work is not exploited without permission.
20. Requirements & Procedure for Registration of Designs Under the Designs Act
• Purpose:
o Design: Protects the aesthetic appearance of an article, focusing on the visual design
applied to the product.
o Trademark: Protects symbols, logos, words, or other marks used to identify and
distinguish goods or services from those of others.
• Scope:
o Design: Covers the shape, configuration, pattern, and ornamentation of a product.
o Trademark: Covers signs, logos, names, and other identifiers used in trade.
• Duration:
o Design: Protection is granted for up to 15 years, with an initial term of 10 years and a
possible renewal for 5 years.
o Trademark: Protection can be indefinite, provided the trademark is renewed
periodically and used in commerce.
• Registration:
o Design: Registration is specific to the visual aspects of an article.
o Trademark: Registration covers brand identifiers and can apply to various goods and
services.
• Infringement:
o Design: Infringement involves unauthorized copying of the design’s aesthetic features.
o Trademark: Infringement involves unauthorized use of a mark that causes confusion
with the registered trademark.
• Exclusive Right:
o The registration of a design grants the owner the exclusive right to use, manufacture,
and sell articles incorporating the design.
• Prevention of Infringement:
o The owner can prevent others from using, copying, or imitating the registered design
without permission.
• Licensing:
o The design owner can license the design to third parties, allowing them to use the
design under agreed terms.
• Assignment:
o The design owner can assign or transfer the rights to another party, either partially or
wholly.
• Legal Remedies:
o The owner can seek legal remedies against infringement, including injunctions,
damages, and accounts of profits.
• Market Advantage:
o Registration provides a competitive edge by ensuring that the design is legally
protected, enhancing market position and brand value.
• Meaning:
o Biological Diversity, or biodiversity, refers to the variety of life forms on Earth,
including the diversity of species, ecosystems, and genetic variations within species. It
encompasses all living organisms, from the smallest microorganisms to the largest
animals and plants.
• Definition:
o According to the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, "biological diversity" means the
variability among living organisms from all sources, including terrestrial, marine, and
other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they are part. This
includes diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems.
• Scope:
o Species Diversity: Refers to the variety of different species within a particular region or
ecosystem.
o Genetic Diversity: Involves the variation in genetic material within and between
species, contributing to the adaptability and survival of organisms.
o Ecosystem Diversity: Encompasses the variety of ecosystems or habitats in a region,
including forests, wetlands, grasslands, and marine environments.
• Importance:
o Biodiversity is crucial for maintaining ecosystem health, providing resources such as
food, medicine, and raw materials, and supporting ecological processes like pollination
and nutrient cycling.
• Establishment:
o The NBA was established under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 to implement the
provisions of the Act and ensure the conservation of biological diversity.
• Powers:
o Regulatory Functions: The NBA regulates access to biological resources and
associated knowledge, ensuring that access is granted in compliance with the Act.
o Granting Permissions: It grants permissions for obtaining biological resources and
associated knowledge for commercial utilization or research.
o Approval for Research: The NBA approves proposals related to research and
development involving biological resources and traditional knowledge.
• Functions:
o Conservation: Formulates and implements policies for the conservation of biological
diversity.
o Awareness and Education: Promotes public awareness and understanding of the
importance of biodiversity conservation.
o Coordination: Coordinates with other national and international bodies on biodiversity
issues.
o Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitors the status of biodiversity and evaluates the
impact of policies and activities on biodiversity conservation.
26. Composition, Powers, Responsibilities & Functions of the State Biodiversity Board
(SBB)
• Composition:
o The SBB is constituted by the State Government and includes a Chairperson, appointed
by the Government, and members representing various departments and organizations
involved in biodiversity conservation.
• Powers:
o Regulation: Regulates the use of biological resources and associated traditional
knowledge within the state.
o Permission: Grants permission for access to biological resources for research or
commercial purposes.
o Monitoring: Monitors and ensures compliance with the Biodiversity Act at the state
level.
• Responsibilities:
o Conservation: Works on conservation strategies tailored to the specific needs of the
state's biodiversity.
o Documentation: Maintains records and documentation related to biological resources
and traditional knowledge in the state.
o Public Awareness: Promotes awareness about the importance of biodiversity
conservation among local communities.
• Functions:
o Preparation of State Biodiversity Action Plans: Develops and implements action
plans for biodiversity conservation.
o Advisory Role: Advises the State Government on matters related to biodiversity and
the implementation of the Biodiversity Act.
o Conflict Resolution: Resolves conflicts arising from the use of biological resources
and traditional knowledge.
• Conservation:
o Legislation provides a legal framework for the protection and conservation of
biodiversity, ensuring that efforts are made to preserve various species and ecosystems.
• Regulation:
o It regulates access to biological resources and traditional knowledge, preventing
exploitation and ensuring that benefits are shared fairly with local communities.
• Sustainable Use:
o Legislation promotes the sustainable use of biological resources, ensuring that their use
does not lead to depletion or degradation of ecosystems.
• International Obligations:
o It helps fulfill international commitments under agreements like the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD) by implementing national strategies and action plans.
• Public Awareness:
o Legislation raises awareness about the importance of biodiversity and encourages
public participation in conservation efforts.
• Research and Innovation:
o Provides a framework for conducting research and utilizing biological resources in a
manner that respects legal and ethical standards.
28. Salient Features, Aims, and Objectives of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002
• Salient Features:
o Legal Framework: Establishes a comprehensive legal framework for the conservation
of biological diversity.
o National Biodiversity Authority: Creates the NBA to oversee and regulate access to
biological resources and traditional knowledge.
o State Biodiversity Boards: Establishes SBBs in states to implement and enforce
biodiversity conservation measures at the state level.
o Biodiversity Management Committees: Sets up committees at the local level to
involve communities in biodiversity management and conservation.
• Aims:
o Conservation: Aim to conserve the rich biological diversity of India, including
ecosystems, species, and genetic resources.
o Sustainable Use: Ensure that the use of biological resources is sustainable and does not
lead to their depletion.
o Benefit Sharing: Promote fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of
biological resources and traditional knowledge.
• Objectives:
o Regulation of Access: Regulate access to biological resources and traditional
knowledge, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.
o Promotion of Research: Encourage research and development related to biological
resources and traditional knowledge.
o Public Participation: Involve local communities in biodiversity conservation efforts
and decision-making processes.
• Function:
o Local Management: BMCs are responsible for the management and conservation of
biodiversity at the local level, involving communities in the decision-making process.
o Documentation: They document local biodiversity and traditional knowledge, ensuring
that it is preserved and used appropriately.
o Awareness: Promote awareness among local communities about the importance of
biodiversity and sustainable practices.
o Conflict Resolution: Address and resolve conflicts related to the use of biological
resources and traditional knowledge.
• Critical Examination:
o Effectiveness: The effectiveness of BMCs can vary depending on their capacity,
resources, and support from higher authorities.
o Community Involvement: The level of community involvement and representation
can impact the success of BMCs in managing local biodiversity.
o Implementation Challenges: BMCs may face challenges in implementing biodiversity
conservation measures due to limited resources or conflicting interests.
• Biodiversity Resources:
o Definition: Refers to the biological resources, including plants, animals, and
microorganisms, found in ecosystems.
o Examples: Medicinal plants, agricultural crops, wildlife.
o Utilization: Can be used for various purposes, including agriculture, medicine, and
industry.
• Traditional Knowledge:
o Definition: Refers to the knowledge and practices developed and passed down through
generations by indigenous and local communities.
o Examples: Traditional healing practices, agricultural techniques, cultural practices.
o Utilization: Provides valuable insights and methods for utilizing biological resources
sustainably and effectively.
• Key Differences:
o Nature: Biodiversity resources are tangible biological entities, while traditional
knowledge is intangible cultural heritage.
o Legal Protection: Biodiversity resources are often protected through regulations on
access and use, while traditional knowledge requires mechanisms for protection and
benefit-sharing to prevent exploitation.
31. Salient Features, Nature, Scope, and Objectives of the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD), 1961
• Salient Features:
o International Treaty: The CBD is a global treaty aimed at promoting sustainable
development through the conservation of biological diversity.
o Three Main Goals: Conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use of its components,
and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources.
• Nature:
o Comprehensive: Covers a wide range of issues related to biodiversity, including
ecosystems, species, and genetic resources.
o Multilateral: Involves participation from countries worldwide, reflecting a global
commitment to biodiversity conservation.
• Scope:
o Global: Applies to all countries, with specific obligations for each party to implement
national strategies and action plans.
o Integrated: Addresses biodiversity conservation in the context of sustainable
development and environmental protection.
• Objectives:
o Conservation: Aims to conserve the diversity of life on Earth by protecting ecosystems
and species.
o Sustainable Use: Promotes the sustainable use of biodiversity resources to ensure their
long-term availability.
o Benefit Sharing: Ensures that benefits arising from the use of genetic resources are
shared fairly with the countries and communities providing those resources.
1. Regulation of Access:
o Section 3 of the Biological Diversity Act empowers the NBA to regulate access to
biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. This includes issuing permits
for the use of these resources for commercial and research purposes.
o The NBA ensures that such access complies with the conditions set by the Act,
including obtaining prior informed consent from local communities.
2. Granting Permissions:
o The NBA grants permissions for obtaining biological resources and traditional
knowledge. It ensures that these permissions are consistent with national biodiversity
strategies and policies.
oThe NBA can also revoke permissions if the conditions of use are violated or if the
resources are exploited in a manner that harms biodiversity.
3. Approval of Proposals:
o Section 6 of the Act stipulates that the NBA is responsible for approving proposals
related to the use of biological resources and traditional knowledge for commercial
purposes.
o This includes evaluating the impact of such use on biodiversity and ensuring that the
benefits are shared equitably with the provider communities.
4. Regulation of Research:
o The NBA oversees and regulates research involving biological resources and traditional
knowledge. It ensures that research activities do not lead to the exploitation or depletion
of these resources.
5. Monitoring and Enforcement:
o The NBA monitors compliance with the Biodiversity Act and enforces regulations to
prevent illegal access to and use of biological resources and traditional knowledge.
o It has the authority to take legal action against violators of the Act's provisions.
1. Policy Formulation:
o The NBA formulates policies and guidelines to support biodiversity conservation and
sustainable use. It plays a key role in shaping national biodiversity strategies and action
plans.
2. Coordination and Collaboration:
o Section 20 of the Act tasks the NBA with coordinating efforts between different
stakeholders, including government agencies, state biodiversity boards, and
international organizations.
o The NBA collaborates with other national and international bodies to address global
and regional biodiversity issues.
3. Public Awareness and Education:
o The NBA promotes awareness about the importance of biodiversity and conservation
through various programs and campaigns. It engages with the public to enhance
understanding and support for biodiversity initiatives.
4. Documentation and Database Management:
o The NBA is responsible for maintaining records and databases related to biological
resources, traditional knowledge, and access permissions. This documentation supports
effective management and policy-making.
5. Conflict Resolution:
o The NBA addresses and resolves disputes related to the use of biological resources and
traditional knowledge. It ensures that conflicts are handled fairly and in accordance
with the Act's provisions.
6. Advisory Role:
o The NBA advises the central government on matters related to biodiversity
conservation and the implementation of international agreements such as the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
33. Procedure and Effect of Registration of Plant Variety under the Protection of
Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001
Effect of Registration
1. Legal Protection:
o Exclusive Rights: Registration provides the breeder with exclusive rights to produce,
sell, and distribute the plant variety. This includes the right to authorize or prohibit
others from using the variety.
o Intellectual Property: It establishes the breeder’s intellectual property rights over the
new variety, protecting it from unauthorized exploitation.
2. Recognition:
o Formal Recognition: Registration officially recognizes the variety and its breeder,
enhancing the breeder’s reputation and credibility in the agricultural sector.
3. Commercial Benefits:
o Market Advantage: The breeder can commercialize the variety and may receive
royalties or other financial benefits from the use of the variety by others.
o Licensing: The breeder can license the variety to others, creating opportunities for
collaboration and further development.
4. Legal Remedies:
o Enforcement: The breeder can seek legal remedies against infringement, including
unauthorized use or reproduction of the variety. This includes filing complaints and
pursuing legal action through the appropriate legal channels.
Duration of Registration
• Initial Duration: The registration of a plant variety under the Protection of Plant Varieties and
Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 is initially valid for 15 years from the date of grant.
• For Trees and Vines: For tree and vine varieties, the registration is valid for 18 years from the
date of grant.
• Renewal: The registration can be renewed for an additional period of 5 years at a time. For tree
and vine varieties, renewal is possible for an additional 10 years at a time.
34. Powers and Functions of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights
Authority
The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FRA) is established under the
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Its powers and functions are crucial for
the administration of plant variety protection and the rights of farmers.
Powers
1. Registration:
o Grant of Rights: Authority to grant certificates of registration for new plant varieties
and farmers' rights.
o Maintenance: Oversight and maintenance of the register of plant varieties.
2. Licensing:
o Issuance of Licenses: Power to issue licenses for the production, sale, and distribution
of registered plant varieties.
3. Compulsory Licensing:
o Granting Licenses: Authority to grant compulsory licenses for the use of plant
varieties under specific circumstances.
4. Enforcement:
o Infringement: Authority to take action against the infringement of plant variety rights.
5. Appeals:
o Review: Authority to review and adjudicate appeals against decisions made by the
Registrar or other related bodies.
Functions
1. Adjudication:
o Dispute Resolution: Resolving disputes related to the protection of plant varieties and
farmers' rights.
2. Regulation:
o Implementation: Enforcing regulations and procedures related to the registration and
protection of plant varieties.
3. Promotion:
o Awareness: Promoting awareness and understanding of plant variety rights and
farmers' rights.
4. Research and Development:
o Support: Supporting research and development initiatives in plant breeding and
protection.
5. Advisory Role:
o Guidance: Providing guidance to breeders, farmers, and other stakeholders on plant
variety rights and related issues.
35. Rights Recognised for the Farmer under the Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights
Act, 2001
Rights of Farmers:
• Right to Save, Use, Exchange, and Sell Seeds (Section 39, PVFRA):
o Explanation: Farmers are granted the right to save seeds from their harvest, use them
for future planting, exchange them with other farmers, and sell them in markets. This
provision respects traditional agricultural practices and ensures that farmers have
control over their planting material.
• Recognition of Traditional Knowledge (Section 2(1)(h), PVFRA):
o Explanation: The Act recognizes and values the contributions of farmers in developing
and conserving plant varieties. It acknowledges their traditional knowledge and
provides for its protection and reward.
• Rights to Benefits (Section 26, PVFRA):
o Explanation: Farmers are entitled to a share of the benefits derived from the
commercialization of plant varieties they have developed or conserved. This ensures
that farmers receive fair compensation for their contributions to plant breeding.
• Protection from Unauthorized Use (Section 39(2), PVFRA):
o Explanation: Farmers are protected from unauthorized use of their traditional varieties.
If their varieties are used commercially without consent, they have the right to seek
compensation.
Legal Issues:
38. Powers and Functions of Plant Varieties and Farmer's Rights Authorities
Powers:
Functions:
• Administrative Duties:
o Explanation: The Authority maintains a registry of plant varieties and their breeders,
updating records as necessary to ensure accuracy and currency.
• Public Awareness (Section 20, PVFRA):
o Explanation: Promotes awareness of plant variety protection and farmers' rights
through educational initiatives, workshops, and information dissemination.
• Support for Farmers (Section 42, PVFRA):
o Explanation: Provides guidance and support to farmers regarding their rights under the
Act. This includes assisting with compensation claims and ensuring that farmers
understand their entitlements.
• Definition:
o Explanation: The term "sui-generis" means "unique" or "of its own kind." India's sui-
generis system for plant variety protection is a distinct legal framework specifically
designed to address the needs and nuances of plant variety protection, differing from
traditional intellectual property regimes like patents.
• Legislative Framework (Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001):
o Explanation: The sui-generis system in India is established under the Protection of
Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (PVFRA). This Act creates a specific set
of rules for the protection of plant varieties and the rights of farmers, acknowledging
the unique nature of agricultural innovation and practices.
• Plant Breeders' Rights:
o Explanation: The Act provides exclusive rights to breeders of new plant varieties,
allowing them to control the production, sale, and distribution of their varieties. These
rights incentivize innovation by granting breeders the ability to benefit commercially
from their creations.
• Farmers' Rights:
o Explanation: The system includes provisions that recognize and protect the
contributions of farmers. Farmers have rights to save, use, exchange, and sell seeds of
the varieties they cultivate. They are also entitled to compensation for their
contributions to the development and conservation of plant varieties.
• Registration and Enforcement:
o Explanation: The PVFRA establishes a mechanism for the registration of plant
varieties. It outlines procedures for registering new varieties, resolving disputes, and
enforcing rights. This includes the creation of the Protection of Plant Varieties and
Farmers' Rights Authority to oversee these functions.
Significance:
Remedies:
Additional Measures:
• Administrative Actions:
o Explanation: The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Authority can take
administrative actions to address violations, including issuing cease-and-desist orders
and conducting investigations.
• Dispute Resolution (Section 34, PVFRA):
o Explanation: Provides a mechanism for resolving disputes related to the infringement
of plant variety rights. This process helps to clarify rights and obligations and ensures
that violations are addressed in a timely manner.
Revocation:
Significance of TRIPS:
Key Provisions:
• Historical Background:
o Adopted: The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works was
first adopted in 1886 and has been revised several times. It represents one of the earliest
international treaties aimed at protecting copyright.
Key Provisions:
• Objective:
o Explanation: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture (ITPGR) aims to promote the conservation and sustainable use of plant
genetic resources. It addresses global challenges related to food security and
agricultural biodiversity.
Key Provisions:
• Bio Piracy: Refers to the unauthorized and often unlawful appropriation of biological
resources and traditional knowledge from indigenous communities. It involves the exploitation
of genetic materials, plants, or traditional practices without proper consent or fair compensation
to the source communities.
• Examples: The extraction of medicinal plants from indigenous regions for pharmaceutical use
without compensating the local communities or obtaining consent.
• Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Bio piracy often involves the misuse of intellectual
property systems to claim patents on genetic resources or traditional knowledge, which were
originally developed by indigenous peoples.
• International Concerns: It raises significant ethical issues regarding the exploitation of
traditional knowledge and biodiversity. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
addresses these issues by promoting access and benefit-sharing.
Regulatory Framework:
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): Emphasizes the need for consent and fair sharing
of benefits derived from the use of biological resources and traditional knowledge. Article 8(j)
focuses on the protection and promotion of traditional knowledge.
• National Legislation: Countries like India have enacted laws, such as the Biological Diversity
Act, 2002, to prevent bio piracy by regulating access to biological resources and ensuring that
benefits are shared with the source communities.
• Definition: Equitable sharing of benefits involves distributing the advantages derived from the
use of biological resources and traditional knowledge fairly among all stakeholders,
particularly the source communities.
• Purpose: Ensures that the benefits, whether financial or otherwise, from the utilization of
genetic resources are shared with the communities that provide these resources, thereby
promoting justice and sustainability.
International Framework:
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): Article 15 mandates the fair and equitable
sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources. This includes monetary benefits
like royalties and non-monetary benefits like technology transfer and capacity building.
• Nagoya Protocol: An extension of the CBD that provides detailed guidelines for access and
benefit-sharing (ABS), setting out procedures for obtaining prior informed consent (PIC) and
establishing mutually agreed terms (MAT).
Implementation:
• Access and Benefit-Sharing Agreements: Contracts between resource users and source
communities that outline how benefits will be shared. These agreements should ensure
transparency and fairness.
• National Legislation: Countries are required to implement national regulations to facilitate the
equitable sharing of benefits, as exemplified by India’s Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
Challenges:
Overview:
• Definition: Plant Breeders' Rights (PBR) are intellectual property rights granted to the breeders
of new plant varieties. These rights give breeders exclusive control over the propagation, sale,
and commercialization of their varieties.
• Purpose: Encourages innovation and investment in plant breeding by providing legal
protection to new and distinct plant varieties.
International Framework:
• UPOV Convention: The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
(UPOV) establishes standards for plant breeders' rights. It sets criteria for distinctiveness,
uniformity, and stability of plant varieties.
• Article 5 of UPOV Convention: Details the rights conferred to breeders, including the right to
authorize or prohibit the production, reproduction, and sale of their plant varieties.
National Legislation:
• Plant Varieties Protection Act, 2001: In India, this Act provides legal protection to plant
breeders by granting exclusive rights to new varieties. It includes provisions for registration,
protection, and enforcement of breeders’ rights.
• Rights Granted: Breeders can control the use of their varieties and receive royalties. Rights
extend to harvested material and products derived from the plant.
• Exceptions: Includes rights for farmers to save and use seeds from their harvest, and for
research purposes, provided the use does not affect the breeder's commercial interests.
Challenges:
• Enforcement: Ensuring compliance and preventing unauthorized use of protected varieties can
be difficult.
• Balancing Interests: Balancing the interests of breeders with those of farmers and researchers.
• Definition: The National Gene Fund is a fund established to promote and support the
conservation and sustainable use of biological resources, particularly focusing on the
collection, conservation, and research of plant genetic resources.
• Objectives: To finance activities related to the conservation of genetic resources, support
research, and facilitate access to these resources for the benefit of society.
Legal Framework:
• Biological Diversity Act, 2002: Establishes the National Gene Fund under Section 26 of the
Act. The Fund is used to support activities that contribute to the conservation of biological
diversity and the implementation of access and benefit-sharing provisions.
Functions:
• Funding: Provides financial support for projects related to the conservation of genetic
resources and the development of databases and repositories.
• Promotion: Encourages the conservation of plant varieties and other genetic resources by
funding research and development activities.
Management:
Challenges:
• Resource Allocation: Ensuring that funds are used effectively and reach the intended
conservation projects.
• Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular assessment of funded projects to ensure they meet their
objectives.
• Benefit Claimers: Refers to individuals or entities who claim entitlement to benefits derived
from the use of biological resources and traditional knowledge. This may include indigenous
communities, local farmers, or organizations involved in the conservation or research of
genetic resources.
• Purpose: To ensure that those who contribute to the conservation and provision of genetic
resources or traditional knowledge receive a fair share of the benefits resulting from their use.
Legal Framework:
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): Emphasizes the need for fair and equitable
sharing of benefits. Article 15 requires countries to recognize and ensure the participation of
indigenous and local communities in benefit-sharing agreements.
• National Legislation: Countries like India have provisions under the Biological Diversity Act,
2002, to recognize and address the rights of benefit claimers.
Claim Process:
Challenges:
• Verification: Verifying the claims and contributions of benefit claimers can be complex.
• Legal Recognition: Ensuring that all benefit claimers are legally recognized and appropriately
compensated can be challenging.
55. Short Notes on Doctrine of Fair Use
• Definition: The Doctrine of Fair Use allows limited use of copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder, under certain conditions. It aims to balance the rights of
copyright owners with public interests in the dissemination of knowledge and information.
• Purpose: To enable uses of copyrighted works that benefit society, such as for criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.
• Copyright Act, 1957: Section 52(1) provides exceptions to copyright infringement, outlining
circumstances where fair use is permitted. Key exceptions include:
o Criticism and Review: Using copyrighted material for criticism or review, with proper
attribution.
o Educational Purposes: Reproduction of works for educational or research purposes.
o News Reporting: Use of works for reporting news, provided it is not commercial.
Challenges:
• Subjectivity: Determining fair use can be subjective and varies depending on the jurisdiction
and specific circumstances.
Biological Resources:
• Definition: Biological resources include genetic material, plants, animals, microorganisms, and
other components of biological diversity that have actual or potential value.
• Importance: These resources are crucial for agriculture, medicine, and environmental
sustainability. They support ecosystem functions and contribute to human well-being.
Traditional Knowledge:
• Definition: Traditional knowledge refers to the wisdom, practices, and innovations developed
and passed down through generations within indigenous and local communities.
• Examples: Includes knowledge related to medicinal plants, agricultural practices, and cultural
traditions.
Legal Framework:
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): Article 8(j) focuses on the protection and
promotion of traditional knowledge. It ensures that traditional knowledge is respected and that
benefits derived from its use are shared with the communities that developed it.
• National Legislation: Countries like India have enacted laws, such as the Biological Diversity
Act, 2002, to protect biological resources and traditional knowledge, ensuring that access and
benefit-sharing are managed fairly.
Challenges:
• Protection and Recognition: Ensuring that traditional knowledge is recognized and protected
against unauthorized use and bio piracy.
• Integration: Balancing the use of biological resources with respect for traditional knowledge
and the rights of indigenous communities
PRACTICAL QUESTIONS
Issue:
• A teacher used a copyrighted musical work for teaching music in a college without permission
from the copyright owner.
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 52): Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act allows for the use of
a work for the purpose of instruction or examination, provided it is not for commercial
purposes. This section provides an exception to copyright infringement for educational
institutions.
• Educational Use: The use of copyrighted music in a teaching environment can be permissible
under fair use provisions if it is strictly for educational purposes and not for commercial gain.
Decision:
• The teacher's use of the musical work for educational purposes in a college is likely covered
under the fair use provision of Section 52. However, if the music was used for purposes beyond
teaching or for commercial activities, permission would be necessary.
Issue:
• A person with a compulsory license for a registered plant variety faces a situation where the
breeder fails to provide necessary seeds.
Analysis:
• Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (Section 84): This Act
provides for compulsory licensing when a plant variety is not available to the public at
reasonable prices. However, the breeder must provide the necessary seeds as stipulated under
the license conditions.
• License Conditions: If the breeder fails to supply seeds, it constitutes a breach of the
compulsory license agreement.
Decision:
• The person with the compulsory license can seek legal recourse against the breeder for failing
to provide the necessary seeds. This can include filing a complaint with the Plant Varieties
Protection Authority or seeking redressal through judicial means.
Issue:
• An architect creates a design for a multistoreyed building. Can the contractor who constructs
the building claim copyright in the design?
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 2(c) and Section 13): The architect who creates the design
holds copyright in the architectural work. The contractor, who merely constructs the building
according to the architect's design, does not have rights to the design itself.
• Ownership of Copyright: The copyright in architectural designs belongs to the creator
(architect) and not to those who construct the building based on that design.
Decision:
• The contractor cannot claim copyright in the architectural design. The rights to the design
remain with the architect who created it.
Issue:
• A textile manufacturer created and displayed certain designs in the showroom. Can these
designs be registered?
Analysis:
• Designs Act, 2000 (Section 4): For a design to be registered, it must be new, original, and not
previously published in India or elsewhere. The design must also be applied to an article and
have an industrial application.
• Display in Showroom: Displaying the design in a showroom does not constitute publication
that would preclude registration if the design meets the criteria of novelty and originality.
Decision:
• The textile manufacturer can apply for registration of the design if it meets the requirements
under the Designs Act. Displaying the design does not automatically disqualify it from
registration.
Issue:
• 'H' conducted a research study and his report was circulated in the Loksabha without his
permission.
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 52): Section 52 provides exceptions for the use of copyrighted
works in the course of reporting current events, but unauthorized circulation of a research
report, especially for legislative purposes, may infringe copyright.
• Rights of the Author: 'H' has the right to control the reproduction and distribution of his work.
Decision:
• 'H' can bring legal action against the unauthorized circulation of his research report. Such use
without permission infringes his copyright, and he can seek remedies under the Copyright Act.
Issue:
• 'Z', a registered breeder, had their registration canceled by the authority without providing
reasons.
Analysis:
• Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (Section 30): The Act requires
that decisions, including cancellations, be made with due process and that the reasons for such
decisions be communicated.
• Right to Appeal: A breeder whose registration is canceled has the right to appeal the decision
if it was made without proper justification.
Decision:
• 'Z' can file a case against the authority challenging the cancellation of registration if it was done
without providing reasons. The breeder has the right to seek judicial review.
Issue:
• 'Y' Company manufactures globes mounted on wooden frames, while another company uses
gold frames. The other company claims copyright in the design of the gold frame.
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 15): Copyright protection applies to original literary, dramatic,
musical, and artistic works. Design alone, such as the frame's material, may not be protected
unless it involves original artistic elements.
• Novelty and Designability: The gold frame may be considered a design if it involves
originality and creativity. However, copyright protection is unlikely for the frame's material
alone.
Decision:
• The other company may not be granted copyright for the gold frame if it lacks artistic
originality. Protection for designs generally requires more than just the material used.
Issue:
• 'Y' paraphrases 10 chapters from 'X's fictional work. Has 'Y' infringed 'X's copyright?
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 2(m)): Copyright infringement occurs if a new work reproduces
substantial parts of a copyrighted work without permission. Even paraphrasing or changing the
wording may infringe if it involves significant portions of the original work.
• Substantial Similarity: If 'Y's work is substantially similar to 'X's original work in terms of
expression, it constitutes infringement.
Decision:
• 'Y' has likely infringed 'X's copyright if the paraphrased work closely mirrors the original
chapters. 'X' can seek legal remedies for copyright infringement.
Issue:
• The registrar under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act refuses to accept
an oral request for correction of the register.
Analysis:
• Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (Section 30): The Act requires
that formal applications be submitted in writing for corrections to the register. Oral requests are
not considered valid.
• Right to Challenge: A refusal based on improper procedure can be challenged if the registrar’s
actions do not comply with the Act’s requirements.
Decision:
• The refusal can be challenged if the application was not properly considered. The breeder
should submit a formal written application as per the Act's requirements.
Issue:
Analysis:
• Designs Act, 2000 (Section 2(d)): A design must be new, original, and have an industrial
application to be registrable. The design must also be applied to an article.
• Functional Aspects: If the car shape has functional or aesthetic features, it may be registrable
if it meets the criteria for originality and novelty.
Decision:
• The paperweight may be registrable if the design of the car shape is original and has not been
previously disclosed. The design must be evaluated for novelty and industrial application.
Issue:
Analysis:
• Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 2(c)): Copyright protection extends to original literary,
dramatic, musical, and artistic works. A single word, even if artistically presented, typically
does not qualify for copyright unless it involves significant creativity and originality.
• Artistic Work: Copyright protection usually requires more than just artistic presentation of a
single word. It generally applies to more extensive creative works.
Decision:
• 'A' is unlikely to claim copyright for a single word, as it does not meet the threshold for
originality and creativity required for copyright protection.