Biochemical Blood Markers
Biochemical Blood Markers
com J O U R N A L O F
                                                                                                                            FORENSIC
                                                                                                                            A N D L E G AL
                                                                                                                             ME D IC IN E
                                          Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 15 (2008) 312–317
                                                                                                                             www.elsevier.com/jflm
Original Communication
                         Received 28 September 2006; received in revised form 24 November 2007; accepted 13 December 2007
                                                           Available online 10 March 2008
Abstract
   Forensic pathologists often hesitate to use biochemical blood markers due to the risk of large postmortem changes and deviations
from healthy subjects. Biochemical analyses of postmortem blood, if possible, may help to evaluate pathological status and determining
the cause of death in forensic diagnosis, for example, in sudden unexpected death without obvious cause, or young adults with no appar-
ent cause of death or antemortem information. Even commercially available biochemical markers were re-evaluated in the blood samples
of 164 forensic autopsy cases. Biochemical markers examined were HbA1c, fructosamine, blood nitrogen urea (BUN), creatinine, total
protein, total bilirubin, c-glutamyl transpeptidase (c-GTP), triglyceride, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP) and pseudocholine
esterase (pChE). We collected cardiac blood (left cardiac blood and right cardiac blood) and peripheral blood (femoral vein blood) to
clarify the differences in measured values by sampling site. The measured values were analyzed in relation to postmortem interval, eti-
ology of death and sampling sites. Of all eleven markers, HbA1c is the most useful and reliable because of its negligible postmortem
changes and small deviation from healthy subjects. Total bilirubin, BUN, CRP and total cholesterol can be useful if we set appropriate
limit ranges and pay attention to the interpretation. For the evaluation of changes due to postmortem intervals, none of the markers
except for triglyceride showed significant changes up to three days postmortem. As for sampling sites, femoral vein blood is generally
recommended considering postmortem changes, but left cardiac blood was suitable for creatinine, pChE, and total cholesterol. For clin-
ical forensic diagnosis of biochemical blood markers, we must determine the ‘‘forensic abnormal value” after collecting more cases by
known causes with more information about the population.
Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd and FFLM. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biochemical markers; Postmortem change; Right cardiac blood; Left cardiac blood; Femoral vein blood; Sampling sites
1752-928X/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd and FFLM. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2007.12.003
                                K. Uemura et al. / Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 15 (2008) 312–317                        313
   There is a complete review by Coe on autopsy samples,                nitrogen urea (BUN) (urease UV method: 6–20 mg/dL)
covering a lot of markers1 and a report by Tsuji et al. on an           and creatinine (enzyme method: male 0.61–1.04 mg/dL,
animal study,2 with respect to postmortem changes in the                female 0.47–0.79 mg/dL) for renal failure, total protein (Biu-
markers. Additionally, there are several reports on the use-            ret method: 6.7–8.3 g/dL) for malnutrition, total bilirubin
fulness of the individual markers in autopsy diagnosis.3–15             (vanadinate oxidation method: 0.2–1.0 mg/dL) and c-glut-
However, there is insufficient information on commercially                amyl transpeptidase (c-GTP) (JSCC standardization
available blood markers and differences in sampling sites in             method: male < 70 IU/L, 37 °C, female < 30 IU/L, 37 °C)
forensic autopsy cases. We chose to measure eleven clini-               for liver function, triglyceride (enzyme method: 50–
cally available biochemical markers in the blood from three             149 mg/dL) and total cholesterol (enzyme method: 150–
sampling sites. The cost for measuring these eleven markers             219 mg/dL) for hyperlipidemia, C-reactive protein (CRP)
by one sample was very low because these markers are rou-               (latex aggregation method, <0.3 mg/dL) for inflammation,
tinely measured in clinical medicine. The cost/benefit factor            pseudocholine esterase (pChE) (rate assay, male 242–
is very important for low-budget forensic facilities.                   495 IU/L, 37 °C, female 200–495 IU/L, 37 °C) for liver func-
   Our aim was to re-examine and evaluate commercially                  tion and organic phosphate poisoning. The sera volume of
available blood markers and their usefulness in forensic                required to measure the 11 markers was 2 mL.
diagnosis. We investigated how biochemical markers in                      The laboratory rejected 2.4% of samples for bilirubin
the blood suffer from postmortem changes and showed dif-                 measurement, but not those for other markers. However,
ferences due to the etiology of death, while determining                we could not measure all the markers in substantial num-
suitable sampling sites. These will be useful for taking post-          bers of cases because of a lack of sample volume.
mortem changes into consideration when selecting markers
and interpreting results.                                               2.3. Statistical analyses
2. Materials and methods                                                   Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical signif-
                                                                        icance was determined as follows: for postmortem interval,
2.1. Blood samples                                                      Spearman’s rank correlation was carried out (Table 2). For
                                                                        etiology of death, one-way ANOVA was carried out. When
   With the permission of the Ethics Committee of Gradu-                there was a difference among groups, Scheffe’s posthoc test
ate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo (No.                    between multiple groups was performed (Table 3). For
690), blood was obtained from 164 consecutive autopsy                   regional differences, one-way repeated measures ANOVA
cases in our department from April 2003 to March 2006                   was carried out. When there was a difference among
(age 0–98, average age 54.9 ± 21.8, median age 57.0, male               groups, a paired t-test for pair-wise comparisons was per-
112, female 52). The postmortem interval of the sampling                formed (Table 4). The software for the above-mentioned
of specimens are as following: 0–12 h (25 cases), 13–69 h               statistical analysis was Statview Ver. 4.11 (Abacus Con-
(69 cases), 25–48 h (54 cases), 49–72 h (16 cases). Causes              cepts Inc., Berkeley, CA). Significant level was 0.05 (5%).
of death were as follows: blunt injury (52 cases), sharp
injury (seven cases), asphyxiation (18 cases), drowning                 3. Results
(four cases), fire death (five cases), intoxication (nine cases),
internal death (39 cases) and others (30 cases). Care was                  We summarized the data for right cardiac blood, which
paid so that the deceased would not be identified from                   were obtained in almost all cases (Table 1). First, HbA1c
the data. The bodies were preserved refrigerated and foren-             showed almost the same mean value as healthy subjects,
sic autopsies were performed within a day after they were               and a very low ratio of abnormal values (24.8%), as com-
found. The blood was sampled from the right and left heart              pared with fructosamine (77.7%), another marker for
cavities and femoral vein within 72 h postmortem, as far as             chronic hyperglycemia. The next group of markers showed
possible. As soon as whole blood was obtained, the sera                 much higher mean values than the healthy subjects, and a
was separated by centrifugation at 1000g, 30 min, and                   higher ratio of abnormal values (37.3–95.1%). This group
stored at 20 °C, while the whole blood was stored at                    included total bilirubin, triglyceride, BUN, CRP, c-GTP,
4 °C as long as a day, until shipping to the laboratory of              fructsamine and creatinine. In the third group, pseudocho-
SRL, Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), where the samples were                    line esterase (pChE) and total cholesterol showed lower
analyzed within a day.                                                  mean values than the healthy subjects and a higher ratio
                                                                        of abnormal values (64.1%, 72.9%). In the last group, total
2.2. Biochemical analyses                                               protein showed almost the same mean value as healthy sub-
                                                                        jects, but a wide variability, and therefore, a high ratio of
  We selected the biochemical markers on the basis of post-             abnormal values (75.3%).
mortem stability reported in previous reports.1–4 The 11                   To evaluate changes due to postmortem intervals, we
markers included HbA1c (latex aggregation method, stan-                 classified postmortem intervals into four groups (0–12 h,
dard range: 4.3–5.8%) and the fructosamine (calorimetry                 13–24 h, 25–48 h, 49–72 h) and carried out correlation
method: 205–285 mM) for chronic hyperglycemia, blood                    analysis between the results obtained for each of the
314                                  K. Uemura et al. / Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 15 (2008) 312–317
Table 1
Differences from clinical standards (right cardiac blood)
Marker                       Measured            Value obtained from                    Unit               n        Results outside the reference
                             value               healthy subjects                                                   intervals of healthy subjects (%)
HbA1c                         5.23 ± 1.23        4.3–5.8                                %                  149      24.8
t-Bilirubin                   1.32 ± 2.44        0.2–1.0                                mg/dL              150      37.3
Triglyceride                 129.9 ± 107.4       50–149                                 mg/dL              155      45.2
BUN                           39.8 ± 40.6        6–20                                   mg/dL              162      59.3
CRP                           7.54 ± 11.54       <0.3                                   mg/dL              163      69.3
c-GTP                        154.1 ± 173.4       Male < 70, female < 30                 IU/L, 37 °C        148      74.3
Fructsamine                  325.3 ± 147.1       205–285                                mM                 148      77.7
Creatinine                    3.29 ± 2.35        Male 0.61–1.04, female 0.47–0.79       mg/dL              163      95.1
Pseudocholine esterase       204.1 ± 120.7       Male 242–495, female 200–459           IU/L, 37 °C        153      64.1
t-Cholesterol                142.3 ± 77.3        150–219                                mg/dL              155      72.9
t-Protein                     7.45 ± 2.09        6.7–8.3                                g/dL               154      75.3
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Table 2
Postmortem interval (right cardiac blood)
Marker                     Measured value                                                                           p-valuea    Postmortem change
                           Postmortem time
                           0–12 h                 13–24 h              25–48 h                 49–72 h
HbA1c                       5.43 ± 1.78 (21)       5.35 ± 1.05 (66)     4.92 ± 1.05 (49)        5.39 ± 1.59 (13)    0.1571      Unchanged
t-Bilirubin                 1.25 ± 2.53 (24)       1.26 ± 2.28 (64)     1.34 ± 2.38 (48)        1.66 ± 3.32 (14)    0.9305      Unchanged
Triglyceride               158.8 ± 82.5 (25)      139.4 ± 138.0 (66)   114.1 ± 73.5 (48)        93.4 ± 65.0 (16)    0.0083      Decrease
BUN                         29.5 ± 29.2 (25)       39.1 ± 34.1 (69)     48.6 ± 51.8 (52)        36.2 ± 40.8 (16)    0.2752      Unchanged
CRP                         7.12 ± 12.54 (25)      9.30 ± 11.55 (69)    6.67 ± 12.22 (53)       3.44 ± 5.42 (16)    0.7540      Unchanged
c-GTP                      131.0 ± 113.3 (25)     135.8 ± 162.9 (61)   165.1 ± 172.6 (49)      229.6 ± 282.8 (13)   0.2545      Unchanged
Fructsamine                304.9 ± 122.5 (22)     308.2 ± 107.7 (66)   360.4 ± 201.7 (45)      301.8 ± 149.3 (15)   0.2711      Unchanged
Creatinine                  3.14 ± 2.93 (25)       3.21 ± 2.11 (69)     3.53 ± 2.48 (53)        3.06 ± 2.02 (16)    0.3442      Unchanged
Pseudocholine esterase     235.3 ± 105.0 (24)     200.9 ± 133.1 (66)   191.4 ± 114.9 (47)      207.4 ± 106.0 (16)   0.2599      Unchanged
t-Cholesterol              165.9 ± 59.3 (25)      135.0 ± 83.5 (66)    143.6 ± 79.3 (48)       131.8 ± 67.1 (16)    0.2212      Unchanged
t-Protein                   7.16 ± 1.92 (25)       7.23 ± 1.89 (66)     7.63 ± 1.96 (47)        8.34 ± 3.15 (16)    0.0998      Unchanged
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. (n): n is the sample number.
 a
   Spearman’s rank correlation test.
                                                                                        K. Uemura et al. / Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 15 (2008) 312–317                                                                    315
p-valuea
                                                                             <0.0001
                                                                             <0.0001
                                                                                                                                                                                 Total bilirubin showed a tendency towards postmortem
                                                                             0.2808
                                                                             0.6044
                                                                             0.5737
                                                                             0.0094
                                                                             0.0063
0.2433
                                                                             0.0039
                                                                             0.9079
                                                                             0.7557
                                                                                                                                                                              increase time-dependently, but not significantly (Table 2),
                                                                                                                                                                              and a relatively small deviation from healthy subjects
                                                                                                                                                                              (37.3%, Table 1). This suggests total bilirubin can be used
Blunt injury
Creatinine
Marker
HbA1c
c-GTP
                                                                                                         b
                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                         a
Table 4
Regional differences in biochemical markers obtained from postmortem blood
Marker                     Measured value                                                        n    p-valuea   Regional differenceb      Recommended
                                                                                                                                          sampling site
                           Right cardiac blood     Left cardiac blood     Femoral vein blood
HbA1c                       5.26 ± 0.94             5.23 ± 0.97            5.20 ± 0.99           40   0.0452     r > fe (r = l, l = fe)   r, l,   fe
t-Bilirubin                 1.27 ± 2.12             1.35 ± 2.18            1.06 ± 1.84           34   0.0001     r = l > fe               fe
Triglyceride               131.4 ± 144.7           147.4 ± 183.1          130.6 ± 104.6          36   ns                                  r, l,   fe
BUN                         45.3 ± 42.6             44.1 ± 42.3            45.1 ± 42.5           39   ns                                  r, l,   fe
CRP                         7.94 ± 10.38            8.12 ± 10.74           6.96 ± 9.27           41   0.0032     r = l> fe                fe
c-GTP                      161.3 ± 192.4           158.4 ± 183.6          128.9 ± 154.6          38   0.0397     l > fe (r = l, r = fe)   fe
Fructsamine                355.9 ± 119.3           355.6 ± 127.0          334.8 ± 106.9          29   ns                                  r, l,   fe
Creatinine                  3.12 ± 2.32             2.95 ± 2.34            3.30 ± 2.38           40   0.0005     l < r = fe               l
Pseudocholine esterase     262.0 ± 137.1           277.3 ± 163.4          250.7 ± 134.0          35   0.0079     l > r = fe               l
t-Cholesterol              178.6 ± 96.6            195.4 ± 118.5          174.6 ± 94.7           34   0.0057     l > r = fe               l
t-Protein                   7.69 ± 1.70             7.78 ± 1.84            6.97 ± 1.89           37   <0.0001    r = l > fe               fe
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD.
r, right cardiac blood; l, left cardiac blood; fe, femoral vein blood; ns, not significant.
 a
   One-way repeated measures ANOVA.
 b
   Paired t-test.
differences among sampling sites. For total bilirubin, CRP,                       ysis of all cases. Then, we can obtain a genuine forensic
c-GTP, total protein we recommend femoral vein blood                             standard.
since these markers tend to increase postmortem and fem-                            In our study we re-examined commercially available
oral vein blood showed a significantly lower value than the                       blood markers and presented the possibility of forensic
others. For creatinine, we recommend left cardiac blood                          diagnosis. For clinical forensic diagnosis using biochemical
since it showed a tendency to increase time-dependently,                         blood markers, we must collect more samples by known
and there was a lower level in left cardiac blood than fem-                      causes with more information about the population, and
oral vein blood. For pseudocholine esterase and total cho-                       thereby determine the ‘‘forensic abnormal value”. Situation
lesterol, we recommend left cardiac blood since it showed a                      that often require biochemical assessment include sudden
tendency to decrease time-dependently, and showed a                              unexpected death without obvious cause, such as alcoholics
higher level in left cardiac blood than femoral vein blood.                      with a low post mortem blood alcohol level, young adults
In fact, left cardiac blood was suitable for measuring the                       with no apparent cause of death and antemortem informa-
value of creatinine, pseudocholine esterase, total choles-                       tion such as present and past illnesses.
terol, while femoral vein blood was good for measuring
the other eight markers (Table 4).                                               5. Conclusion
   When biochemical blood markers are used in forensic
practice, we need the reliability of the standard values. In                        In our postmortem biochemistry study of 164 consecu-
clinical medicine, standard values are calculated from the                       tive autopsy cases, HbA1c was clearly a reliable marker.
samples obtained from healthy adults (usually 20–40 years                        Total bilirubin, BUN, CRP and total cholesterol would
of age). Needless to say, there is no perfect standard value                     have been useful if we had set an appropriate limit range
with blood samples obtained from forensic autopsies                              and been careful in the interpretation. For the evaluation
because the samples are from the deceased with various                           of changes due to postmortem intervals, the triglyceride
causes of death, agonal states, complications, treatments                        value decreased according to the postmortem interval, but
and postmortem changes. These factors generally affect                            other markers did not show significant changes up to three
the level of markers. This is a serious problem. We tenta-                       days of postmortem. As for the etiology of deaths, the value
tively tried to calculate a forensic standard value of HbA1c,                    of asphyxiation showed a higher value that of blunt injury
which shows negligible postmortem changes, and obtained                          and internal death, reflecting the difference in the cause of
a value of 2.77–7.69% (mean ± 2SD), although our data                            death. Additionally, femoral vein blood is generally a suit-
included abnormal values due to etiology of death. How-                          able sampling site for measuring blood biochemical mark-
ever, the limitation of this kind of study is derived from                       ers because of its relatively slight postmortem changes.
the lack of information on death scene circumstances, pres-                         Postmortem biochemistry is poorly understood, under
ent and past illness, as well as the various backgrounds of                      used at present because of concerns about postmortem
the victims. Therefore, we must be aware that above-men-                         changes and large deviations from healthy subjects, while
tioned standard value is only a guideline. A more accurate                       it has great potential for forensic service work and future
forensic standard value should be determined after collect-                      research into the sudden unexpected death without obvious
ing more samples and excluding apparently abnormal data                          cause, or young adults with no apparent cause of death or
due to pathological changes on the basis of complete anal-                       antemortem information. As the next step for clinical
                                   K. Uemura et al. / Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 15 (2008) 312–317                                      317
forensic diagnosis on the basis of biochemical blood mark-                       special reference to the cause of death and survival time. Forensic Sci
ers, we must determine the ‘‘forensic abnormal value” after                      Int 2002;130:160–6.
                                                                            7.   Tamaki K, Katsumata Y. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for
collecting more samples by known causes with more infor-                         plasma thyroglobulin following compression of the neck. Forensic Sci
mation about the population.                                                     Int 1990;44:193–201.
                                                                            8.   Ansari MQ, Zamora JL, Lipscomb MF. Postmortem diagnosis of
Acknowledgements                                                                 acute anaphylaxis by serum tryptase analysis. Am J Clin Pathol
                                                                                 1993;99:101–3.
                                                                            9.   Akane A, Shiono H, Matsubara K, Tanabe K, Nakamura H,
   We thank Mr. Kakuji Kawai and Ms. Mihoko Nakam-                               Hasegawa M, et al. Analysis of glycated albumin in postmortem
ura for collecting blood samples in autopsies.                                   blood samples as the diagnostic parameters of diabetes mellitus. Jpn J
                                                                                 Legal Med 1992;46:237–43.
                                                                           10.   Kuroda N. Determination of glycated hemoglobins of cadaveric
References                                                                       blood: a study involving the use of affinity chromatography with m-
                                                                                 amino phenyl boronic acid. Jpn J Legal Med 1990;44:115–25.
1. Coe JI. Postmortem chemistry update. Am J Forensic Med Pathol           11.   Khuu HM, Robinson CA, Brissie RM, Konrad RJ. Postmortem
   1993;14:91–117.                                                               diagnosis of unsuspected diabetes mellitus established by determi-
2. Tsuji A, Ikeda N, Kojimahara M, Takeichi S. Forensic application of           nation of decedent’s hemoglobin A1c level. J Forensic Sci
   biochemical blood analysis – experimental studies of postmortem               1999;44:643–6.
   changes of value in cadaveric blood. Res Pract Forensic Med             12.   Winecker RE, Hammett-Stabler CA, Chapman JF, Ropero-Miller JD.
   1993;36:97–103 [in Japanese].                                                 HbA1c as a postmortem tool to identify glycemic control. J Forensic
3. Hart AP, Zumwalt RE, Dasgupta A. Postmortem lipid levels for the              Sci 2002;47:1373–9.
   analysis of risk factors of sudden death. Usefulness of Ektachem and    13.   Goullé J-P, Lacroix C, Bouige D. Glycated hemoglobin: a useful post-
   Monarch analyzers. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1997;18:354–9.                    mortem reference marker in determining diabetes. Forensic Sci Int
4. Tsuji A, Ikeda N, Kojimahara M, Takeichi S. Forensic application of           2002;128:44–9.
   biochemical blood analysis – normal range of cadaveric blood. Res       14.   Valenzuela A. Postmortem diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Quantita-
   Pract Forensic Med 1992;35:105–8 [in Japanese].                               tion of fructosamine and glycated hemoglobin. Forensic Sci Int
5. Uhlin-Hansen L. C-reactive protein (CRP), a comparison of pre- and            1988;38:203–68.
   post-mortem blood levels. Forensic Sci Int 2001;124:32–5.               15.   Zhu BL, Ishida K, Quan L, Taniguchi M, Oritani S, Li DR, et al.
6. Fujita MQ, Zhu BL, Ishida K, Quan L, Oritani S, Maeda H. Serum                Postmortem serum uric acid and creatinine levels in relation to the
   C-reactive protein levels in postmortem blood – an analysis with              causes of death. Forensic Sci Int 2002;125:59–66.