File Documents
File Documents
Deployment of Health Caravan; medical doctor providing health consultation at the San Isidro
Gymnasium, Abra (Photo: PRC).
A. Situation analysis
Category Effects
• 1,748,258 population in the provinces reported intensity VI / VII and where people
stayed in evacuation centers (Abra, Ilicos Sur, Kalinga, Mountain Province, Benguet
Affected population and La Union).
• 574,367 individuals or 155,911 families were directly affected in 1,403 barangays, in
Region I, II and CAR.
Casualties and injured • 11 people died and 609 have been injured due to the earthquake effects.
Displaced – inside • 6,176 individuals or 1,910 families were displaced in 46 evacuation centres, according
evacuation centres to PRC assessment.
Displaced – outside
• 27,207 individuals or 6,490 families are displaced outside evacuation centers in CAR.
evacuation centres
Houses damaged • A total of 36,780 houses were damaged, of which 856 were totally damaged.
Damage to • 2,728 infrastructures were damaged in Region I, II, III, CAR and NCR. Total estimated
infrastructure cost PHP 2.65 billion (CHF 44 million).
Damage to Agriculture • PHP 74.89 million (CHF 1.26 million) estimated damaged.
Work or class
• 157 workplaces and 81 classes were suspended.
interruption
• 169 roads and 11 bridges were not passable.
• 48 cities/municipalities experienced power interruption/outage.
Social infrastructure
• 8 cities/municipalities suffered water system interruption/outage.
• 1 Hospital was damaged and transferred the patients to nearby facilities.
Summary of response
Overall response actions at the end of the DREF operation are summarized below:
As an auxiliary to the public authorities, PRC maintains a strong relationship with government bodies through
participation or collaboration with (i) the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), (ii) the
provincial, municipal, and barangay (community) disaster risk reduction and management councils, and (iii) the local
government units defined in the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act 2010. The PRC participates in NDRRMC
meetings and coordinates with the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) and the Department of
Health. PRC headquarters and local chapters coordinate with the national and provincial disaster risk reduction and
management councils (NDRRMC and PDRRMCs).
PRC was identified as a key humanitarian partner of the government in fighting against COVID-19 under the landmark
"Bayanihan to Heal as One" Act (Bayanihan I) and the superseding "Bayanihan to Recover as One" Act (Bayanihan II).
The latter provided resources to continue the testing and treatment of COVID-19 and granted a stimulus package to
help households and businesses to recover from the secondary socio-economic impacts. Moreover, a 'Bayanihan to
Arise as One" Act (Bayanihan III) was under consideration, which provided further assistance for households in crisis,
micro, small and medium enterprises, as well as support to vulnerable people such as indigenous, unemployed, and
displaced.
Overview of Red Cross Red Crescent Movement in country
The IFRC Philippines Country Delegation supported the PRC in disseminating updates to the IFRC network in-country
and coordinated with the IFRC Asia Pacific Regional Office (APRO) in Kuala Lumpur under the IFRC Secretariat's
Emergency Response Framework. The PRC also hosted broader Movement coordination meetings involving the ICRC
and operational meetings to share information with partners. IFRC and PRC coordinated with ICRC on security-related
considerations as well as on potential complementarity of action where it was required.
A Regional Task Force meeting was held on 27 July with IFRC Country Delegation (CD) and APRO, to discuss the
current situation on the ground, the current response of PRC and possible assistance from IFRC. There are six National
Societies present in the Philippines: American Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross,
Netherlands Red Cross and Spanish Red Cross. IFRC CD had close coordination with the in country PNSs.
IFRC is leading the Philippine Shelter Cluster in support of the government lead agency – Department of Human
Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD). The in-country shelter cluster coordinator was active with providing
coordination support and technical assistance with the lead government agency. There were over 40 plus Shelter Cluster
members composed of UN Agencies, INGOs, National and Local NGOs, Civic Society Organizations and Academes.
Shelter Cluster coordinated with its partners on the response operations. Immediately after the Abra earthquake, the
Philippine Shelter Cluster convened to map out the next immediate actions of the partner shelter agencies. The cluster
facilitated to conduct the rapid structural valuation of buildings and houses in the Municipality of Bangued covering the
communities of Angad, Cosili East, Cosili West, Sagap, Dangandangla and Various.
According to NDRRMC, total of PHP 185 million (CHF 3.1 million) worth assistance was provided by the Government.
Majority of which was food packs from the DSWD amounting to PHP 65 million (CHF 1.1 million).
Situational Report No. 4 of NDRRMC, the estimated cost of assistance provided by LGU and other stakeholders is PHP
5,442,226.73. Majority of which are food packs coming from the Department of Social Welfare and Development
amounting to PHP 3,520,297.80.
Information available through Shelter Cluster on other actors’ response: Adventist Development and Relief Agency
(ADRA), Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and CARITAS Philippines, Habitat for Humanity, IOM, Philippines, Philippine
Red Cross, OXFAM, and World Vision deployed teams to conduct assessments on the ground. In coordination with
DSWD and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, IOM deployed 3,000 USAID shelter-grade tarpaulins
and an eight-person Quick Response Team composed of CCCM, Shelter, WASH, Health/MHPSS to CAR.
The IFRC continuously coordinated with various government and non-government agencies, including members of the
Humanitarian Country Team (HCT). At the country level, PRC and IFRC participated in HCT meetings, both during
disasters and non-emergency times.
Duty of Care
Teams adhered to and practiced all precautionary measures outlined in the Asia Pacific COVID-19-safe Best Practice
Guide for Disaster response. Specifically, regarding person-to-person transmission, the National Society followed the
four key actions: plan, maintain physical distance, ensure hygiene 1, and identify and support vulnerable people.
Immediate actions were triggered as per guidelines if there was contact with a suspected/confirmed case of COVID-19
during the line of work. The PRC volunteers were insured and provided access to psychosocial support, and the security
of the volunteers was always a priority throughout the operation.
The operation was delivered to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission to disaster-affected people. The PRC
developed guidance to identify actions needed to safeguard the community and volunteers. WHEN REQUIRED, the
PRC provided COVID-19 testing before deployment to the field and upon returning to the office via the PRC molecular
laboratories. The Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IAFT) coordinated
the government response to COVID-19. All activities carried out within this operation were coordinated with LGUs in
compliance with the national protocols set by the IAFT.
Needs analysis and scenario planning
Needs analysis
The preliminary analysis indicated that the earthquake was very strong and was very shallow, where it is believed that
shallower quakes tend to be more damaging than deeper quakes. In terms of exposure, total of 1,748,258 population
were living in the provinces reported intensity VI / VII and where people stayed in evacuation centers (Abra, Ilicos Sur,
Kalinga, Mountain Province, Benguet and La Union). According to NDRRMC report total of 574,367 individuals or
155,911 families were affected by the earthquake. Furthermore, according to flash report no.3 of AHA Center $872k
(USD) worth of infrastructure (total replacement cost) were concentrated within 245km of the epicenter. The likelihood
of impact to lifelines (power, communication, transportation) was moderate. Based on secondary data and information
from PRC chapters, immediate needs were identified which included food, emergency shelter, health (including PSS),
essential household items, water, sanitation and hygiene. Summary of immediate needs outlined below:
• Shelter: The earthquake damaged or destroyed infrastructure and was a need to support those families whose
houses were damaged and displaced with immediate shelter solutions. A total of 12,802 damaged houses were
reported: 12,645 partially damaged and 157 fully damaged. Many stayed in open areas exposed to the monsoon
rains, in evacuation centres, or with host families as their houses were not habitable or were in unsafe areas. There
was a need to consider medium-term shelter solutions such as the distribution of conditional cash, materials and
technical assistance. Furthermore, those displaced have not brought their belongings during evacuations, hence
there was a need to provide essential household items.
• Livelihoods and basic needs: There was a need to provide ready-to-eat meals for displaced families as many of
them were apprehensive about returning to their houses and unable to prepare meals. The earthquake disrupted
the daily lives of the affected population, and there was a need for multipurpose cash grants to support the survival
threshold for meeting other immediate household and food needs. The Government of the Philippines addressed
the cash need.
• Health: The earthquake put pressure on already stretched public health systems. Damages to the Abra Provincial
Hospital were reported, which required transportation of patients to nearby hospitals. There were hospitals and
health facilities without adequate supplies and human resources to cater to all the patients in need of services, and
a risk that facilities could become overwhelmed. Immediate First Aid (FA) and Psychosocial Support (PSS) including
Psychological First Aid (PFA) to the affected population were the most needed service at immediately after the
disaster; to support people with different mental health and psychosocial needs from the earthquake and the
continued threats of disease, including COVID-19. It was reported that families were sleeping in open areas due to
the fear of aftershocks, and not feeling safe to return to their homes. There was a pivotal need to provide the affected
population and the volunteers deployed with MHPSS. Furthermore, there was a need to deploy chapter medical
teams. Additionally provision of mosquito nets as part of the essential household items kit as there was a threat of
vector-borne diseases, such as dengue due to the monsoon season.
• Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH): Earthquake damage the water system and disrupt access to water supply
and sanitation facilities. There was a need to mobilize water treatment units to provide safe drinking water to families
displaced and staying in evacuation centres; as well as temporary sanitation facilities. Due to the sudden nature of
the earthquake, families at evacuation centres required basic hygiene items and key hygiene messages.
• Protection, Gender, and Inclusion (PGI): Following disasters, protection concerns particularly regarding
separated and unaccompanied children, and young women known to increase. Vulnerable groups were at risk to
exploitation, traumatic experiences, and gender-based violence (GBV). Housing units of host families had limited
access to basic facilities that were safe for women and children. Addressing such risk were incorporated in the
response plans and in the messaging and community engagement of the PRC. Additionally, the provision of MHPSS
activities for children, as well as the setting up of child-friendly spaces where they can have opportunities for safe
play, recreation, and non-formal education, were identified as a priority need.
B. OPERATIONAL STRATEGY
Overall Operational objective:
The operational strategy and scope was based on the initial assessment conducted by PRC. This DREF operation met
the immediate needs of the most vulnerable people affected by the earthquakes in Tayum, Abra. A total of 10,842
families (54,209 people) in Abra and Ilocos Sur were supported with essential household items, emergency shelter
assistance, health, WASH and welfare services over four months.
• Shelter: This DREF allocation aimed to assist 400 families (2,000 people) affected by the earthquake by providing
the following essential household items; sleeping kit (two blankets, two sleeping mats, two mosquito nets), two jerry
cans, one hygiene kit. Families displaced outside the evacuation centers (target: 100 families (500 people)) were to
provide with family tent and hygiene kit per family. PRC mobilized the above essential household items from its pre-
positioned stocks and DREF funding was utilized to replenish the items. At least 400 families (2,000 people) were
to be assisted through shelter assistance.
• Livelihood: This DREF allocation aims to provide at least 1,000 hot meals per day/chapter, up to 14 days to the
people displaced and staying at evacuation centers. Targeting families inside evacuation centers. At least 3,000
people were to be assisted with hot meals in this sector.
• Health: This allocation supported PRC in addressing arising health concerns through health promotion and
mobilization of ambulance services, provision of first aid and mobilization of chapter medical teams in the affected
areas. Furthermore, this allocation supported the mobilization of assets and volunteers in the possibility of a larger
response and disease and outbreak prevention. In-line with the current COVID-19 situation in country, people were
be provided with facemasks based on their needs. Furthermore, IEC materials containing health messages were
printed and distributed at evacuation centres and communities. At least 3,000 people were to be assisted through
health assistance.
• WASH: This allocation supported the PRC in deploying water tankers and water purification units for the distribution
of safe and clean water until the damaged pipelines were fixed/repaired. It was expected that at least up to 30-day
water will be distributed in the affected areas. This was accompanied by health and hygiene promotion conducted
by Red Cross Action Teams (RCAT143) volunteers focused on epidemic prevention focusing on vector-borne
diseases, and safe water storage and utilization. A total of 700 families were to be provided with 2 jerry cans under
the essential household items mentioned in the above shelter section and during water distribution in the
communities. Total of 500 families were to be provided with 1 hygiene kit under the essential household items
mentioned in the above shelter section and during tent distribution to people displace outside evacuation centers.
Furthermore, if the displacement was more than one month, an additional hygiene kit were to be provided to each
family. These activities were coupled with information, communication, and education (IEC) materials. At least
10,000 people were to be assisted through WASH assistance.
• Protection, Gender and Inclusion: This allocation supported PRC in welfare activities at the evacuation centres,
including distribution of hot meals, provision of psychosocial support, and restoring family links. Child-Friendly
Spaces (CFS) were set up to conduct child-friendly activities, including educational ones for the children who were
in evacuation centres. Furthermore, children were provided with play kits. At least 10,000 people were to be
assisted through PGI assistance.
The DREF allocation supported conducting the needs assessments and the deployment of emergency response units
like the water search and rescue team. PRC led the response, and this DREF directly contributed to the overall PRC
plan of action and national appeal.
Human resources
All relief activities were be implemented by staff and Red Cross 143 volunteers (RC143 and RCAT143), and National
Disaster Response Team (NDRT) members from other chapters, where needed. The DREF Operation covered
insurance, COVID-19 testing, and visibility costs (bibs, caps, polo shirts, etc.) for volunteers supporting the response
efforts. IFRC CD supported PRC by providing technical support and ensured accountability and compliance concerning
the operation. Appropriate PPEs were provided for personnel involved in the DREF operation, given the health risks. In
addition, rapid response personnel were to be requested to support the response based on the need.
Communication
PRC Communications team supported by IFRC APRO communications ensured that Red Cross response efforts were
effectively communicated and visible amongst key public audiences on time. PRC staff and volunteers across the
country were actively contributed to institutional communications through its own social media networks. A composite
team of PRC communications officers worked together to generate high-quality photos, video clips, and news stories
for use across IFRC and PRC social media and other digital media platforms. Mobile messaging groups (via Facebook
Messenger) were set up between PRC's operations centre, Disaster Management Services (DMS), deployed
assessment teams, and PRC and IFRC communications' focal persons shared real-time information and data from
responders on the ground and vice versa.
Security
The PRC security framework applied to all PRC staff and volunteers throughout the DREF Operation duration. All PRC
staff and chapter volunteers were encouraged and supported to complete IFRC Stay Safe e-learning courses. Where
the presence of personnel under IFRC Security responsibility was needed and approved, the IFRC security framework,
including the IFRC Philippines country security regulations and contingency plans, applied to that person. An area-
specific security risk assessment was conducted for the operational area. Risk mitigation measures were identified and
implemented as required. This included security briefings for all IFRC personnel, movement monitoring for Field travel,
and availability of safety equipment. All IFRC must, and RCRC staff and volunteers were encouraged to complete the
IFRC Stay Safe e-learning courses, i.e. Stay Safe Personal Security, Stay Safe Security Management, and Stay Safe
Volunteer Security online training. Coordination with the ICRC was observed through regular information-sharing
following the existing and agreed-on RCRC Movement arrangements. However, in 2019, the provincial government of
Abra declared the armed opposition group as Persona Non-Grata which puts the Abra LGU as a hotspot for attacks as
retaliatory actions as part of the recovery efforts of their mass base and to widen their strongholds. Their strongholds
were in Balbalan, Lubuagan, and Lacub as manifested by their activeness in terms of movements and sightings in the
aforementioned areas. Mitigating efforts like staying away from these areas lessen the risk of getting in between the
rebels and the government troops in case a head-on armed encounter happens.
Shelter
People reached: 2,500
Male: 1,250
Female: 1,250
People in Abra and Ilocos Sur Provinces experienced most of the impact of the earthquake. After the earthquake
shook the area, residents immediately left their houses and took shelter in the designated evacuation centers.
With the intensity of the earthquake, several houses were left totally damaged or sustained severe damages, leaving
them uninhabitable. Some of the most vulnerable displaced families stayed outside their houses with the fear of
possible aftershocks, and safety concerns and/or stayed in the evacuation centers.
The local government authorities support the communities or families affected to check the integrity of the houses
before returning home to ensure the safety of the families or advised them to stay in their relatives and/or evacuation
centers temporarily.
The PRC mobilized the RC 143 volunteers, chapter staff and NHQ staff to conduct the rapid assessment and provide
the relief assistance. A total of 697 families were provided with essential household items. With the DREF funding,
PRC reached 500 families and 197 families were reached with PRC bi-lateral funding. The essential household items
included two blankets, two sleeping mats and two mosquito nets. PRC mobilized the above essential household items
from its pre-positioned stocks and DREF funding was utilized to replenish the items.
Essential Household Item distribution to the people affected by Abra earthquake (Photo: PRC).
Table 2: Number of families provided with essential household items
# of families
Province Municipality/City Barangay
Served
Bangbangar 2
Bangued Sagap 8
Ubbog 5
Manabo Madago San Ramon East 3
Abra Pidigan Suyo 16
Pilar Poblacion 48
Tubo Supo 148
Villaviciosa Poblacion 70
Sub Total 300
Bantay Poblaction 10
Burgos Mapanit 20
Nagbukel Taleb 35
Matibuey 82
Ilocos Sur San Emilio
Tiagan 46
Sto. Domingo Paras 2
Vigan Brgy. III 5
Sub Total 200
Grand Total 500
Moreover, PRC extended support to families living outside the evacuation centers by providing 33 family tents, from its
bilaterally received stock.
The shelter cluster facilitated to conduct rapid structural valuation of buildings and houses in the Municipality of
Bangued covering the communities of Angad, Cosili East, Cosili West, Sagap, Dangandangla and Various. A total of
343 structures were assessed, of which 177 were tagged as inspected, 142 were under of restricted use and 24 were
off limits. In addition, the shelter cluster coordinated the distribution of more than 3,000 shelter-grade tarpaulins and
construction of transitional shelters.
As there were no proper roads or the roads/bridges were damaged, community together with staff and volunteers had to use carts or carry items to the
affected areas (Photo: PRC).
Challenges
• Chapter building deemed unsafe to continue work.
• Furthermore, affected areas were mountainous and had no proper roads, some of the roads/bridges were
damaged, hence had access issued. Where the teams had to carry the items to the affected areas.
• COVID-19 pandemic; travel restrictions and community/staff/volunteers contracting the virus. This led to
postponing planned activities. Limited the number of trained staff/volunteers who were otherwise available for
deployments.
Lessons Learned
• Operation center was transferred outside the chapter to a safe location and to continue the emergency
operation.
• Future operations shall be delivered in a manner that minimizes the risk of COVID-19 transmission for people
and staff/volunteers of PRC in the affected areas. Trained staff/volunteers from other operations could be
deployed in needed.
• Capacity building identified as a key area to enhance the skills and knowledge of staff/volunteers, who could
be deployed in future response operations. Disaster Assessment, Relief Management and Relief Distribution
Simulation Exercises were identified as some of the key areas of capacity building.
Food was the priority for displaced population. Hence, PRC sent its fleet of food trucks to vulnerable communities to
provide hot meals. The Red Cross 143 volunteers and staff helped in the preparation and distribution of hot meals at
evacuation centers and outside evacuation centers. PRC complemented the food pack distribution from LGU by
providing total of 22,765 hotmeals. Of which 21,545 hotmeals were supported through the DREF and 1,220 hotmeals
were supported with PRC bi-lateral support.
Initially PRC was planning to provide at least 1,000 hot meals per day/chapter over a period of 14 day, totalling to
28,000 hotmeals. Targeting to reach at least 3,000 people over the period. Based on the other needs on the ground
and contrbution from the other actors, PRC has provided hotmeals in 30 municipalities reaching 22,970 people.
Health
People reached: 5,730
Male: 2,865.00
Female: 2,865.00
The emergency operation was implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic time. The operation was delivered to
minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission to disaster-affected people and ensured duty of care to staff and
volunteers. PRC developed guidance to identify actions needed to safeguard the community and volunteers. PRC
provided COVID-19 testing before deployment to the field and upon returning to the office via the PRC molecular
laboratories. Furthermore, PRC provided necessary PPE to staff and volunteers. Total of 5,403 face masks were
provided to affected people in the communities. Total of 2,510 IEC materials; COVID-19 leaflets were printed and
distributed to ensure better messaging.
Challenges
• Some of the common impacts of earthquake include damage to roads and bridges which resulted to the delay in
response and implementation of activities.
• Difficulty in coordination with stakeholders due to limited or poor network signal created confusion and delayed
response in some areas.
Lessons Learned
There is a need to further strengthen partnership and linkages between chapters and stakeholders (LGUs, community,
schools, and barangays) for fast response and quick implementation of PRC activities/services.
Indicators:
Target Actual
Number of people provided with safe water (according to WHO standards)
10,000 54,209
in the affected area
Number of people reached with hygiene promotion 10,000 23,564
Number of assessments/monitoring visits undertaken and shared (as part
1 2
of the (RDANA)
Number of people provided with safe water (according to WHO standards) 10,000 54,209
Number of litres of safe water distributed (cumulative) Based on the need 2,043,927
Number of households provided with jerry cans 700 695
Number of people benefitted from the temporary latrine and shower
Based on the need -
facilities in the evacuation centres
Number of cleaning activities conducted in the evacuation centres/
Based on the need -
community
Number of people reached by hygiene promotion activities 10,000 23,56421
Number of volunteers involved in hygiene promotion activities 20 20
Number of households provided with a set of essential hygiene items 500 991
Narrative description of achievements
PRC deployed five water tankers and one water treatment unit to the
affected areas together with trained WASH personals to manage
generation and distribution of safe drinking water to the affected areas.
The WASH team distributed 2,043,927liters of safe drinking water over a
period of 30 days which have reached 54,209 people. As part of PRC
objective to provide and ensure clean water to affected communities,
there were series of orientations on proper process of water treatment Installation of water treatment unit (Photo: PRC).
and utilization conducted in the communities. The objective of orientations was to inform and assure the communities
about the quality of distributed water. PRC collected water sample and submitted test results to the local government
authorities for issuance of safety certificate. The water samples were subject for quality test by ISO certified
laboratories to determine its physical and bio-chemical properties and PRC coordinated and facilitated the process.
Furthermore, PRC supported 1,023 families with provision of two jerry cans each, to store the water distributed. Of
which 695 families were supported through the DREF support and 328 families were reached through PRC bi-lateral
funding.
Challenges
• There was only one hydrant available in Abra and it was shared by multiple water tankers. The priority areas were
distant, and some areas were in upland areas, which made drive difficult. Challenge was overcome by installation
of the water treatment unit to provide water.
• Local dialect: the majority of the community is Ilocano, and some had difficulties in understanding other languages.
• Lack of trained chapter volunteers to conduct WASH assistance.
• Breakdown of some of the water tankers during the operation.
Lessons Learned
• Regular monitoring of assets, periodic maintenance and quarterly inventory check to ensure assets are
maintained in good condition.
• Encourage the chapters to build capacity of the volunteers by providing specific WASH related training. Also the
local volunteer will understand the dialects within the communities. This will specifically help in conducting
software components of WASH activities such as hygiene promotion.
PRC/IFRC ensured the children are protected from exploitation and abuse regardless of their nationality, culture,
ethnicity, gender, religious or political beliefs, socio-economic status, family, or criminal background, physical or
mental health or any other factors of for discrimination.
To help affected families, 222 welfare desks were set up
in evacuation centres. Welfare desks assist displaced
people with: i) restoring family links (RFL); (ii) tracing; (iii)
inquiry and communications; (iv) contact of relatives;
and (v) referral. There were total of 5,730 people
reached through psychological first aid. Furthermore,
PRC reached 7,645 children through the 32 child-
friendly space established in evacuation centers and
through mobilization of clowns for entertainment.
Affected population have direct access to information on the nature and scope of services provided by PRC, the
community accountability and feedback/response mechanism was integrated into programming. Along with the
process, the community are enabled to participate and give their feedback.
Logistics effectively managed the supply chain, procurement, customs clearance, fleet, storage, and transport to
distribution sites as per the operation's requirement and aligned to IFRC's logistics standards, processes, and
procedures. Logistics provided a strong capacity of the PRC logistics built over the last years, and this operation was
supported by an experienced IFRC CD logistics team. IFRC CD supported PRC to mobilize and transport needed
equipment and relief items to the affected areas. PRC mobilised its relief stocks to support the people affected, which
was replenished through DREF. The blankets and sleep mats which met the local specifications were replenished
locally by the IFRC logistics team, whereas IFRC standard relief items, such as mosquito nets, hygiene parcels and
jerry cans were replenished internationally by IFRC Global Humanitarian Services & Supply Chain Management, Asia
Pacific (GHS&SCM-AP) unit based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
The PRC led the Movement’s overall response for this operation, maintaining close coordination with Movement
partners in the country and providing updates. The PRC works with the IFRC, the ICRC and six Partner National
Societies (PNSs) in the country: the American Red Cross, the Canadian Red Cross, the Finnish Red Cross, the German
Red Cross, the Netherlands Red Cross and the Spanish Red Cross.
The PRC hold monthly in-country movement-wide meeting to update partners on ongoing plans and activities. Partners
also share relevant information about plans and activities in the country. IFRC coordinate with in-country PNSs on the
launching of the DREF request to support PRC provide humanitarian services to communities affected.
IFRC is leading the Philippine Shelter Cluster in support of the government lead agency – Department of Human
Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD). The in-country shelter cluster coordinator was active with providing
coordination support and technical assistance with the lead government agency. There were over 40 plus Shelter
Cluster members composed of UN Agencies, INGOs, National and Local NGOs, Civic Society Organizations and
Academes. Shelter Cluster coordinated with its partners on the response operations. Immediately after the Abra
earthquake, the Philippine Shelter Cluster convened to map out the next immediate actions of the partner shelter
agencies. The cluster facilitated to conduct the rapid structural valuation of buildings and houses in the Municipality of
Bangued covering the communities of Angad, Cosili East, Cosili West, Sagap, Dangandangla and Various.
Challenges
None.
Lessons Learned
None.
PRC and IFRC communications team worked on the messaging, Audio Visual materials, stories/infographics that
presented a clearer picture of the damages, supported by statistics and data. Some publications by PRC on websites
and social media are as follows:
PRC Website:
• PH Red Cross Response in Ilocos Sur
• PH Red Cross Intensifies Water Distribution in Earthquake Hit Abra:
Twitter Post:
• PRC Volunteers Monitoring Areas of Responsibility
• PRC Photos Damage in Abra and Ilocos Sur
Other Websites:
• Philippine Red Cross Continues to Help Earthquake Hit
• PH Red Cross Directs Volunteers to Stand By, Assess EQ Hit Areas
• PH Red Cross Promotes Proper Hygiene Kit in Quake-Hit Areas
PRC was planning to conduct a lesson learned activity in the end of the emergency operation. Due to overlapping
activities PRC was unable to conduct the lesson learned activities. Challenges and lessons learned reflected in this
report were based on the PRC sectoral reports which was organized to review the operational timeline and actions
taken, analyse the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), as well as conduct an after-action
review.
Challenges
None.
Lessons Learned
None.
The finance and administration team provided operational support to budget validation, bank transfers, and technical
assistance to PRC to validate invoices. All financial transactions of this operation were conducted in accordance with
the IFRC’s standard financial procedures. The DREF project agreement was signed upon the activation of the DREF.
The existing IFRC country security plan, including security regulations, contingency plans for medical emergencies,
relocation and critical incident management were applied to all the personnel under IFRC security’s responsibility.
For PRC staff and volunteers, the National Society’s security framework was applied. Regular and close coordination
was maintained with the ICRC in accordance with the existing security framework and Movement’s coordination
agreement. Regular information sharing was maintained and specific security protocols for each level of security.
All IFRC and RC/RC staff and volunteers were encouraged, to complete the IFRC Stay Safe e-learning courses, i.e.,
Stay Safe Personal Security, Stay Safe Security Management and Stay Safe Volunteer Security online training.
Challenges
None.
Lessons Learned
None.
D. Financial Report
The total allocation for this DREF was CHF 241,921 of which CHF 185,543 (77%) was utilized. The balance of CHF
56,378 will be returned to the DREF pot. The variance in the budget reflects the actual response needs on the ground
after the initial rapid assessment and the continued assessment and response review throughout the operation. This
also takes into considerations bi-lateral support to PRC, Government, and other responses at community level.
The major donors and partners of the Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) include the Red Cross Societies and
governments of Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, German, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway,
Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland, as well as DG ECHO, Blizzard Entertainment, Mondelez
International Foundation, Fortive Corporation and other corporate and private donors. The IFRC, on behalf of the
relevant National Society, would like to extend thanks to all for their generous contributions.
In IFRC Geneva
• Christina Duschl, Senior Officer, Operations Coordination; email:
christina.duschl@ifrc.org
How we work
All IFRC assistance seeks to adhere to the Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
Movement and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) in Disaster Relief and the Humanitarian Charter and
Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response (Sphere) in delivering assistance to the most vulnerable. The
IFRC’s vision is to inspire, encourage, facilitate and promote at all times all forms of humanitarian activities
by National Societies, with a view to preventing and alleviating human suffering, and thereby contributing to the
maintenance and promotion of human dignity and peace in the world.
bo.ifrc.org > Public Folders > Finance > Donor Reports > Appeals and Projects > DREF Operation - Standard Report 2022 Page 1 of 2
Selected Parameters
I. Summary
Opening Balance 0
Expenditure -185,543
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds
bo.ifrc.org > Public Folders > Finance > Donor Reports > Appeals and Projects > DREF Operation - Standard Report 2022 Page 2 of 2
Selected Parameters
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds