0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views4 pages

1

The document is a peer observation form used for evaluating a microteaching session. It includes a rating scale for various aspects of content organization, presentation, personal characteristics, teaching methods, and use of teaching aids. Observers provide ratings and comments for each criterion to assess the effectiveness of the presenter.

Uploaded by

bachcongminh1998
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views4 pages

1

The document is a peer observation form used for evaluating a microteaching session. It includes a rating scale for various aspects of content organization, presentation, personal characteristics, teaching methods, and use of teaching aids. Observers provide ratings and comments for each criterion to assess the effectiveness of the presenter.

Uploaded by

bachcongminh1998
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

PEER OBSERVATION

Observer Microteaching presenter

Name: Name:
____________________________________ _________________________________

Group: Group:
___________________________________ ________________________________

Rating scale (1 = very poor, 2 = weak, 3 = average, 4 = good, 5 =


excellent, NA = not applicable) CONTENT ORGANISATION

1. Introduction promoted interest and oriented participants to 1 2 3 4 5


the topic. NA

2. Goals and objectives of the lesson were clearly stated. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

3. Body of lesson highlighted main idea(s). 1 2 3 4 5


NA

4. Lesson was targeted to the audience (material was not too 1 2 3 4 5


advanced; terminology was explained). NA

5. Content was appropriate for the time allotted (lesson was 1 2 3 4 5


able to complete logically within the time limit). NA

6. Wrap-up and summary at the end. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

Comments:

Asdfsag

asdgasdgsadg

PRESENTATION

7. The material was explained in an understandable way. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

8. The lesson was smooth, sequenced, and logical. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

9. The lesson was well-paced (not too slow, information 1 2 3 4 5


identified in introduction was covered, nothing felt too rushed). NA

10. Directions were clear, concise, and participants were able 1 2 3 4 5


to carry them out. NA

11. Answered questions satisfactorily. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

12. Showed enthusiasm for the subject taught through facial 1 2 3 4 5


and physical expression. NA

13. Demonstrated understanding of the concepts presented 1 2 3 4 5


and provided accurate information. NA

14. Extemporaneous delivery (e.g. no reading off notes or 1 2 3 4 5


slides) NA

Comments:

Asdfsa

qwoeijroiasdjf

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS

15. Patience in eliciting responses. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

16. Clarity, tone, and audibility of voice. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

17. Pronunciation, intonation, fluency. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

18. Appropriate and acceptable use of language. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

19. Communicates effectively in speech. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

20. Appropriate personal appearance 1 2 3 4 5


NA

Comments:
TEACHING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES

21. Applied appropriate principles of ESL/EFL learning and 1 2 3 4 5


teaching methodology. NA

22. Effective activities/exercises chosen to achieve the 1 2 3 4 5


objectives. NA

23. Appropriate use of small groups/pair work during each 1 2 3 4 5


activity. NA

24. Used examples/illustrations effectively to clarify points. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

25. Encouraged participants to engage in activities. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

26. Asked questions at different levels.

27. Sufficient wait time for participants’ responses. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

28. Good rapport with participants. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

29. Provided informative feedback to participants. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

30. Was able to adapt to unanticipated situations. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

31. Nonverbal gestures enhanced the lesson (and were 1 2 3 4 5


undistracting). NA

32. Moved appropriately during lesson to interact with 1 2 3 4 5


audience or emphasize important points. NA

33. Sufficient and appropriate eye contact with audience. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

Comments:
USE OF TEACHING AIDS

34. Clear and well-organized projector screen/chalkboard 1 2 3 4 5


content. NA

35. Visual aids can be easily read. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

36. Provided an outline/handouts. 1 2 3 4 5


NA

37. Appropriate use of technology (video, laptop, audio, web 1 2 3 4 5


materials) NA

38. Particularly creative use of technology, realia, and/or 1 2 3 4 5


other teaching tools. NA

Comments:

You might also like