Understanding Leadership

Through the Lens of Dr.

B.R. Ambedkar

Submitted by
Fathima Mirza E.C.
PRN: 1172230300
S.Y. B.A . Political science
 Abstract
This paper focuses on the life and works of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, a constitution
maker of India and a social reformer. The purpose of the this research is to assess
the e ectiveness of the actions undertaken by Ambedkar in the ght against social
discrimination and to analyse his contribution to the formation of anti-discriminatory
legislation and policies.Through this case study we shall be also looking into various
leadership theories, understand and learn more about leadership characters and
those characters that are particular to Dr.B.R. Ambedkar , that made him an
exceptional leader of all times.

This paper uses a qualitative research approach and relies on historical records,
speeches, writings of Ambedkar as well as , various writings on B.R. Ambedkar to
set the background on the impact of Ambedkar to the Indian society. Some of the
highlights includes , Ambedkar’s campaign for the rights of lower castes and how
he fought the caste system and how he successfully made and implemented laws
aimed at reducing discriminatory social divisions. His conversion to Buddhism in
1956 , symbolised a rebellion against Hindu conservatism as he believed that that
Buddhism was the only way for the Untouchables to gain equality.

Additionally, this paper claims that it is Ambedkar’s work that established a starting
point for the contemporary discourse on social justice; his ideas are still re ected in
the Indian policy-making process addressing the problems of the lower castes and
minority policies. Ambedkar's advocacy led to the constitutional provision of
a rmative action, reserving seats in educational institutions, government jobs, and
legislatures for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

In conclusion, the case study argues that Ambedkar was not only a constitutional
reformer but a social justice activist and a leader of a social change movement. His
principles continue to be relevant today giving strength to the ght against
discrimination and inequality that still persist in few parts of our country .
ffi
ff
fi
fi
fl
INTRODUCTION
Leadership is the ability to inspire, guide, and in uence others toward a common
goal, uniting people across diverse areas like business, politics, and social causes.
Strong leaders set clear directions, ensure alignment, and inspire commitment,
adapting to the needs of their team and motivating them to achieve ambitious
goals. In times of crisis, e ective leadership becomes essential, as it helps
organisations navigate challenges, make di cult decisions, and drive innovation. In
the course of history, there were many outstanding leaders who in uenced society
with their vision, courage, and actions . One such leader was Dr. Bhimrao Ramji
Ambedkar, or B.R. Ambedkar, who was one of the most signi cant leaders in the
creation of modern India. He himself coming from a Dalit caste , Ambedkar was a
champion of social justice, equity, and human rights, particularly for the Dalits, who
were oppressed massively. This project examines the leadership of Ambedkar and
the change he brought about, as well as the lessons of his life.

We will explore Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s leadership through various leadership theories,
which help explain how and why certain people become leaders. These theories
focus on the qualities and behaviours people can adopt to improve their leadership
skills. While there are many leadership theories, a few key ones will help us analyse
Ambedkar’s leadership style. Here’s an overview:

1. Great Man Theory

• This theory suggests that leaders are born with certain qualities, such as
charisma, courage, and intelligence, which set them apart. It implies that
leadership is not something that can be taught—you either have it or you
don’t. Historical gures like Napoleon and Gandhi are often seen as "natural-
born" leaders under this theory.

2. Trait Theory

• Trait Theory focuses on speci c personality traits commonly found in leaders,

such as ambition, self-con dence, and integrity. According to this theory,
people who possess these traits are more likely to become leaders, though
having these traits doesn’t guarantee success in leadership.

3. Behavioural Theories

• Unlike the previous theories, Behavioural Theories focus on what leaders do,
not who they are. These theories argue that leadership is a set of behaviours
and skills that can be learned and practiced, rather than something you're
fi
ff
fi
fi
ffi
fl
fi
fl
 born with. Leaders can improve by learning speci c behaviours that
contribute to e ective leadership.

4. Transformational Leadership Theory

• Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their followers to achieve more

than expected. They are visionaries who promote innovation, creativity, and
change. These leaders have charisma, a strong sense of purpose, and a clear
vision for the future. Driven by ethical and moral principles, they often bring
about large-scale social changes and inspire people to work toward a
collective goal.

5. Transactional Leadership Theory

• Transactional leadership is more structured and focuses on routine tasks and

clear goals. Leaders use rewards and punishments to ensure that followers
meet speci c objectives. This type of leadership is often focused on stability,
short-term goals, and maintaining existing systems, rather than making major
changes or driving innovation.

6. Servant Leadership Theory

• Servant leadership emphasises putting followers’ needs rst. These leaders

focus on the welfare, development, and empowerment of others, leading with
humility, empathy, and a strong commitment to social justice. They prioritise
helping others grow and succeed.

7. Ethical Leadership Theory

• Ethical leaders guide others with principles of morality, fairness, and honesty.
They act in ways that align with high moral standards and serve as role
models for ethical behaviour, inspiring followers to uphold these values.

8. Advocacy Leadership Theory

• Advocacy leaders champion the rights and needs of speci c groups, often
working for social justice and equality. These leaders push for systemic
changes to create a fairer society, especially for marginalised groups.
fi
ff
fi
fi
fi
 9. Charismatic Leadership Theory

• Charismatic leaders inspire and attract followers through their personality,

vision, and sense of mission. They lead by personal in uence, creating a
strong emotional connection with followers and uniting them around a
common purpose.

Together, these theories give us a range of perspectives to understand leadership.

They help explain what makes e ective leaders, and how these qualities can be
applied in di erent situations. This framework will allow us to examine Dr.
Ambedkar’s leadership style and understand the impact he had on society.

B.R. Ambedkar was chosen for this case study because of his unique and
impactful leadership. He was not only a political leader but also a social reformer
who aimed to transform Indian society at its core. His ght against caste
discrimination, the introduction of a rmative action, and his role as the principal
architect of the Indian Constitution are examples of his long-lasting in uence.
Ambedkar's leadership is a powerful example of how one person can bring about
deep social change through dedication, vision, and ethical leadership.

What follows is a case study on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, one of the foremost architects
of Indian Constitution and an activist for social justice perceptions. The study aims
to assess Ambedkar's initiatives against caste-based discrimination, predominantly
for downtrodden communities and also evaluate his contribution in bringing policies
of social justice.

The study utilises qualitative methods and employs historical documents, speeches
of Ambedkar, writings manufactured by him combined with other secondary
sources to outline the extent related his in uence on Indian society. The key ndings
reveal that Ambedkar actively challenged the caste system through a political role
advocating for lower-caste rights and consequently, legislative reforms represented
by three constitutional amendments.
ff
ff
ffi
fl
fl
fi
fl
fi
LITERATURE REVIEW

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was one of the visionary leaders who changed Indian society.
He stood for social justice, equality, and human rights. As a leader who was quite
resilient and innovative, his goal was to annihilate the caste system, which used to
discriminate and marginalise certain groups of society. In this review, Ambedkar's
leadership is explored in the backdrop of leadership theories that already exist in
the literature. Special attention has been given to Ambedkar's unique style of
leadership, decision-making, crisis management, and con ict resolution. This
analysis provides a lot of insight into the characteristics that made Ambedkar a
transformational leader whose in uence still continues.

Leadership Theories and Concepts

In order to understand Ambedkar's leadership, one needs to discuss the most

pertinent theories in the eld of leadership studies. The most important of these
include Transformational Leadership, Situational Leadership, and Servant
Leadership.

Transformational leaders were rst conceptualised by James MacGregor Burns.

Bernard Bass further developed this conception of leaders as individuals who guide
their followers toward a speci c goal while working to realise large-scale change.
Thus, they focus on becoming better for others and address higher needs while
espousing the shared vision of moving in the right direction. This idea is quite
closely related to the Ambedkar mission to reform the social and political structures
of Indian society, particularly in his advocacy for the marginalised and his role in
drafting the Indian Constitution. Such situational leadership was developed by Paul
Hersey and Ken Blanchard, which suggests changing the style of leadership
according to the situation and the degree of readiness of the followers. Ambedkar
showed a similar kind of exibility while he was a legal expert, social reformer or
legislator. As each situation and audience requires di erent strategies, Ambedkar
presented an e ective model of versatility in approach; he could work with anyone
and deliver substantial results under any circumstances.

Servant leadership was rst termed by Robert Greenleaf when he stressed that a
good leader should put the interests of his followers before himself. The life and
work of Ambedkar re ect this same principle. His focus was on the betterment of
ff
fl
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fl
ff
fl
 Dalits and other subordinated groups, which exempli ed servant leadership
because societal welfare was always his top priority rather than personal interest.

These frameworks collectively position Ambedkar's leadership style in a context,

shedding light on the strategies that he used in tackling deeply entrenched
injustices within Indian society.

Leadership Styles in Context: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

The leadership style of Ambedkar is complex and draws on many di erent theories
to form a distinctive approach that scholars often classify as transformational. His
e orts were to change India's social and political landscape fundamentally, and in
addition, situational and servant leadership are incorporated in these e orts. Each
of these aspects will be discussed below:

Indeed, his contribution as the primary designer of the Indian Constitution, an act of
more than mere legality, involves Ambedkar's active participation as a strong
defender and voice for a secular, democratic, and inclusive India. As a result of
such, he sets principles and directions for generations into social action and
leadership of those believing in social justice and equality.

He demonstrated situational leadership, as he changed the way of approach to

things and even his persona in order to suit the demands of the role he was playing.
For example, his approach was di erent for each of the roles he played, from being
a constitutional architect, a ghter for Dalit rights, and a political representative. In
each case, he adapted his methods to suit the needs of the occasion, showing
strategic thinking and exibility.

Servant leadership describes Ambedkar's lifelong service to the oppressed as

sel ess leadership. In his career, he gave himself to the task of ensuring rights and
protections to the marginalised rather than individual promotion. This is clearly seen
in his continuous drive for Dalit emancipation, which he espoused despite many
obstacles as an example of commitment above all to others' welfare.
ff
fl
fl
fi
ff
fi
ff
ff
Leadership in Crisis

The most critical time when Ambedkar proved his crisis management skills was
while negotiating the Poona Pact in 1932. It was a time of extreme contention
between Ambedkar and other leading political gures in the country, including
Mahatma Gandhi, as far as the issue of Dalit representation was concerned. Initially,
Ambedkar wanted separate electorates for Dalits, so that they could have fair
political representation. However, Gandhi opposed this step.

During this crisis, Ambedkar had demonstrated grit, statesmanship, and

commitment to the cause of the Dalits. He had compromised in the face of severe
personal and political pressures and settled the question of reserved seats for the
Dalits in provincial legislatures-an accomplishment that went down in history. This
episode of crisis management by Ambedkar brings into limelight his capacity to
take hard decisions and negotiate solutions that would serve the cause of
marginalised communities.

Decision Making

His choices were rational, empathetic , all in the making of the Indian Constitution.
His commitment to creating a just and inclusive society: liberty, equality, and
fraternity were core principles infused into the Constitution. The blending of diverse
ideas derived from Western political thought into an adaptation for India, suited to
the needs of Indian society, was how Ambedkar worked to develop a framework.

Ambedkar was very much concerned with long term implications in his decisions,
for example, the ght he posed for equal rights and the protection of minorities left
long-lasting legacies for democracy in India and safeguarding the marginalised. In
these, Ambedkar clearly showed that he was of his time but was de nitely thinking
ahead of it also and could balance idealism with pragmatism towards building a
strong base in the country.
fi
fi
fi
 Con ict Resolution

Ambedkar always faced opposition in terms of ideology by others due to his

progressive opinion on caste and social equality. However, he would always resolve
con icts using non-violent, intellectual, and democratic approaches. This is quite
evident in the fact that he debated Gandhi regarding separate electorates for Dalits,
exemplifying how he managed ideological disagreement toward achieving his social
justice objective without aggression.

An example of the con ict resolution strategy of Ambedkar is his conversion to

Buddhism in 1956. In the face of religious and cultural oppression which Hinduism
symbolised for Dalits, he converted peacefully to Buddhism. This new religious path
that represented empowerment and dignity for Dalits was a choice through which
he avoided direct confrontation with his goals and gave his community a sense of
identity outside Hindu orthodoxy.

Applying leadership theories to Ambedkar's life reveals his style as transformational,

situational, and servant leadership traits all mixed into one.

This case study will utilise theories of leadership-Transformational, Situational, and

Servant leadership to analyse how Dr. B.R. Ambedkar led and was successful.
Transformational leadership will teach us how Ambedkar made people turn towards
change for instance changing social and legal rules through working on the Indian
Constitution.

Situational leadership will bring into light the fact that he managed himself di erently
in a di erent role from being a social reformer to becoming the architect of the
Constitution. Servant leadership will emphasise the commitment of the man to the
welfare of the marginalised communities, and how he will demonstrate
consideration of the welfare of others instead of personal gain. When combined,
these theories will provide a more nuanced view of Ambedkar's leading roles,
mainly his decision-making, crisis management, and con ict resolution, thus
allowing us to see the impact of this man on social justice and equality.
fl
fl
ff
fl
fl
ff
 From Crisis to Constitution: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s
Leadership in a Divided India , Leadership Context
and Challenges

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, a great leader and father of the Indian Constitution, in the 20th
century, had been through one of the toughest landscapes which was marked with
deep-seated social evils, political turmoil, and economic hardships across India. He
was a re ection of the socio-historical setting in which he functioned, with a
dominant caste culture, colonial governance, and an emerging democratic
structure. This essay analyses speci c historical, political, social, and economic
contexts within which Ambedkar worked, the challenges he encountered, and how
these in uenced his leadership approach. The essay explores the major crises and
turning points in his career, hence focusing on Ambedkar's strategic decisions and
the theoretical underpinnings of his leadership style.

Historical Context

Born in 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was brought up in a society so entrenched in the caste
system that millions were marginalised and oppressed, especially the Dalits, who
were previously known as "Untouchables." The British colonial rule worsened social
inequalities at the same time as introducing democratic ideals. The socio-political
landscape was complicated further by the rise of nationalist movements, which
tended to neglect the plight of the lower castes. Ambedkar was thus a voice for
social justice and equality among Indians committed to an end to caste-based
discrimination, in this context.

The British Raj gave political representation but at the same time continued with
social strati cation. Self-governance in parts was granted through the Government
of India Act in 1919, which served no purpose in bridging the gap for marginalised
societies. It was an awareness of the growing social injustice that led Ambedkar to
further his education and be a strong intellectual movement leader in the ght for
the rights of the oppressed.
fl
fl
fi
fi
fi
Political Context

The Indian political history of which Ambedkar's life was part is marked by great
ideological divisions, and the path to independence, taken by a large section of the
population, was that of being divided between the moderate and radicals within the
Indian National Congress. In this context, Ambedkar faced opposition from the
mainstream leadership, including Mahatma Gandhi, who often bypassed the caste
discrimination issue under the banner of national integration.

Perhaps Ambedkar's principal political challenge was dealing with the

representation of Dalits in the political structure of India through discussion. His
demand for separate electorates on behalf of Dalits formed in 1932 after the Poona
Pact made the debate intense, since Gandhi opposed the claim of separate
electorates across the board because it would divide people, which made
Ambedkar have to negotiate the terms of the representations on behalf of Dalits
while retaining allegiance to their cause.

Social Challenges

Socially, Ambedkar faced a society steeped in prejudice and discrimination. The

caste system institutionalised social hierarchies, and attempts to uplift the Dalits
were met with immense resistance. Ambedkar's social reform advocacy included
not only legal changes but also the wide social opinion on caste.

One of the signi cant turning points in Ambedkar's career was when, in 1956, he
embraced Buddhism along with millions of other Dalits. This act therefore was a
negation of the hegemonic structures of Hinduism and presented a very deep
challenge to the social order of his times. In embracing Buddhism, Ambedkar
therefore wanted to confer on his community an identity linked with dignity and
equality-equal contradiction to the legitimacy of the prevailing system of caste.
fi
Economic Perspective

Economically, India was shifting from a colonial economy to that of a developing

nation. The exploitation by the colonisers had left many communities in a state of
abject poverty, and caste further deepened the economic inequalities. Economic
empowerment was the only way through which social equality could be achieved,
believed Ambedkar. He insisted that education and economic opportunities for the
Dalits were necessary; otherwise, social justice could not be achieved without
economic rights.

He criticised the economic policy through his writings, as was done in "Thoughts on
Linguistic States" and "The Problem of the Rupee: Its Origin and Its Solution." An
economy without discrimination was one that he desired. There individuals should
be able to hold onto economic equality. Economic justice was also to be included
within this democracy.
Major Crises and Challenges

Ambedkar's political career, in brief, was recorded through crises that he

encountered during his tenure, testing his leadership and resolve. One of the most
severe crises that took place was the Poona Pact of 1932-the day on which
Ambedkar stood face to face with Gandhi at intense con ict. With all types of
political opposition against him, Ambedkar proved to be remarkably resilient in
strategic thinking and reached an acceptable compromise on the political
representation of Dalits.

The Indian Constitution drafted was another point of crisis. Ambedkar being the
chairperson of the Drafting Committee made him at the forefront of presenting the
legal framework for India. He had to answer the aspirations of di erent communities
without compromising the rights of the marginalised sections, and his including
provisions that addressed social justice and equality dealt with social change in
India.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar faced many major challenges that shaped his leadership style.
These challenges were deeply connected to the social and political issues in India
during the early 20th century, a time when the caste system was very rigid, colonial
rule had left its mark, and the nationalist movement was increasingly divided.

Caste Discrimination and Social Injustice

Ambedkar experienced the harsh realities of the caste system, which fuelled his
drive for social justice and equality. This personal struggle led him to focus on
transforming society by advocating for education and legal rights for marginalised
communities.

Colonial Rule and Political Oppression

Under British rule, marginalised people had little political power. Ambedkar believed
that real freedom would come from political representation, which led him to legal
advocacy and political involvement. His work on the Indian Constitution and his
legal background were tools he used to push for social change.
fl
ff
Divisions Within the Nationalist Movement
Ambedkar proposed various reforms to end untouchability and promote social and
economic equality, such as lowering the minimum marriage age for women and
increasing rights for disadvantaged groups. His view of social justice went beyond
education and economic opportunity—it included full participation in society.

Resistance from Traditional Social Structures

Ambedkar faced strong resistance from the traditional caste system. His conversion
to Buddhism in 1956 was a powerful statement against Hindu orthodoxy and an
expression of cultural freedom. This step showed his multi-dimensional leadership,
both in politics and in rethinking culture.
 Leadership Style and Approach of Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was both an important gure in the ght for social justice of India
and a leader with diverse styles and approaches which have been studied and
followed extensively. His approach of ghting against the caste system and his
commitment towards other underprivileged sections de ned leadership for him. This
essay shall analyse the leadership style of Ambedkar by drawing on the di erent
theories and concepts along with discussing his strengths and weaknesses,
communication style, decision-making process, and emotional intelligence. Through
all these facts, we would be able to derive a greater understanding of how
Ambedkar moulded his leadership style for the challenges he had to overcome .

Below given are few leadership approaches that align with his style of leadership .
This analysis will help us to better understand the skills, aspects that lead to his
remarkable leadership qualities

Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is very well embodied in the person of Ambedkar who

inspired and motivated his followers toward an extraordinary outcome when great
change was there in the face. Being chief draftsmen of the Indian Constitution, he
was trying to achieve a legal system which brought justice and equality, but also
infused in millions of the oppressed masses the will to ght for their rights. He
argued for changes that went beyond mere legal reforms; he fought to change the
very character of Indian society. In this context, his call, "We are Indians, rstly and
lastly," re ects his dream of a nation in which all, regardless of caste or creed, share
equal rights.

Servant Leadership

Ambedkar's commitment toward uplifting the downtrodden shares much in

common with Robert K. Greenleaf's idea of servant leadership wherein he believes
that the only true leader is a server, and the primary concern of a leader is his or her
service to people. His conversion to Buddhism in 1956 served as a declaration of
adherence to a religion of equality and dignity for Dalits as a strategic move toward
facing the caste system. He was constantly striving for the education of Dalits; his
servant leadership was re ected in institutions like the "People's Education Society"
fl
fl
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
ff
and a very active role in shaping educational rights in the Indian Constitution. This
shows the strong motivation of serving other people.

Situational Leadership

Ambedkar was one of those great leaders who, according to the context and the
level of preparedness of his followers, adopted a situational leadership approach.
He bargained over Gandhi at the Poona Pact in 1932, displaying the ability to work
out complex political terrains. Initially, very strong and stubborn about Dalits
needing separate electorates, he compromised the cause for the greater good when
opposed violently. The ability to adapt was crucial in leadership and made him
readjust strategies according to demands in situational circumstances.

Strengths of Ambedkar's Leadership

He possessed the characteristic of Visionary thinking

One of the greatest strengths of Ambedkar was visionary thinking that could
articulate a clear vision for a just and equitable society based on a profound
understanding of India's socio-political landscape. His commitment to constitutional
democracy and social justice was driven by a keen awareness of the injustices
faced by marginalised communities. His advocacy laid the groundwork for a more
equitable society.

Communication Style

A born communicator, Ambedkar could take very di cult ideas and put them into
words so easily that it would immediately resonate with the diversity of audiences.
His speech and writings, particularly the "Annihilation of Caste," called for
challenges against the traditional society norms and inspired the oppressed people
to act upon them. In this scenario, while commenting, "I measure the progress of a
community by the degree of progress which women have achieved," he directly
linked gender equality with his overall vision for social justice-a very clear example
of how he was able to join together di erent issues of social reality with his
intentions for change.

Ambedkar's determination and perseverance in the face of adversity also made him
a successful leader. He had tremendous opposition, political and social. However,
he never backtracked in his mission. He proved to be persistent in coping with
personal as well as professional hardships faced by him. Such were the hardships
ff
ffi
 he was compelled to su er due to struggles against casteism and the other
factional elements who were then ruling the roost within the Indian National
Congress. For instance, despite severe criticism due to the separate electorates
stand, he did not even step one inch forward because he was sure of the political
representation needed by the Dalits.

Weaknesses of Ambedkar's Leadership

Called as Polarising Figure

Although Ambedkar was known as an icon for the cause of social justice, yet he
was controversial at certain times. The ideas he presented were controversial,
which, although socially oriented, brought criticism not only from conservative
circles but sometimes from the leadership of the national movement. These radical
and new ideas at times resulted in limiting coalitions towards change within society.

The Con ictive Stance of Ambedkar with Other Leaders

Ambedkar's strong advocacy for Dalit rights often put him at loggerheads with other
leaders, especially Gandhi. This ideological con ict prevented a united front against
colonial oppression. For example, the insistence on separate electorates for Dalits
was a source of great friction within the nationalist movement, though it was a
stance that had to be taken to ensure political representation of the marginalised.

Decision-Making Processes and Emotional

Intelligence

Strategic Decision-Making

Ambedkar's style of decision-making was strategic thinking and rational approach.

He had taken much care about the implications of his decisions, especially in
constitutional law and social policy. The participation of Ambedkar in drafting the
Indian Constitution represented a commitment to informed decision-making, based
on wide research and consultation. His strategic foresight ensured that the
Constitution addressed the needs of all citizens, especially the marginalised.

Emotional Intelligence

Ambedkar's emotional intelligence played a big role in his leadership. His deep
understanding of the challenges of the Dalit community led him to connect
fl
ff
fl
emotionally with people. For example, while speaking about historical injustice
against Dalits, he invoked the collective pain and aspirations of his audience so that
solidarity and trust emanated from his followers to him. This emotional bond was
not only a catalyst for mass action but also energised the will of the marginalised to
struggle for their rights.

Adjustment of Leadership Style to Context

Ambedkar's leadership transformed with the changing socio-political scenario and

is testimony to his adaptability as a potent tool. During the British colonial era, he
was more interested in legal advocacy and education as a means of empowerment.
Once India gained independence, he began working on implementing provisions he
had helped draft in the constitution by stressing the need for social reform.

This is better illustrated in his engagement with di erent political groups and
leaders. While displaying his ideological principles, he recognized the importance of
collaboration where needed. His willingness to engage in negotiation regarding the
Poona Pact depicted this aspect, negotiating for political representation, despite
opposition.

Conclusion

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's leadership style and approach were largely in uenced by the
socio-political context that dominated his time-caste discrimination and colonial
oppression. His application of transformational, servant, and situational leadership
theories reveals adaptability and commitment to social justice. Though his
strengths, such as visionary thinking and resilience, took him forward, his
weaknesses, such as polarising views and ideological con icts, made things di cult
for him. It was Ambedkar's emotional connection with his followers and strategic
decision-making that cemented his legacy as a transformative leader. His work on
India's constitution as well as his e orts towards the rights of less privileged
societies made his leadership a subject to be studied as a necessary study in
changes and delivery of justice to generations after generations.
ff
ff
fl
fl
ffi
Key Decisions made by B.R. Ambedkar and Their
Impact

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was a transformative leader who left an indelible mark on India’s
social, political, and economic structure . His decisions were not only remarkable
at the time but have also had lasting e ects on the country, in uencing generations
and continuing to inspire social justice movements globally. This analysis will
discuss key decisions made by Ambedkar, evaluating their short-term and long-
term impacts on the Indian society and beyond.

1. Founding of the Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha (1924):

Dr. Ambedkar’s decision to found the Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha in 1924 marked
the beginning of his formal social and political activism. The Sabha's main goal was
to promote education, social welfare, and the economic empowerment of Dalits.
Through this organisation, Dr. Ambedkar aimed to provide a platform for the
marginalised to address their issues, especially caste discrimination, and create
awareness about their rights.

Initially Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha quickly became an important voice for the Dalit
community. Dr. Ambedkar's e orts helped spread education among Dalits and
created a sense of unity and shared identity among the oppressed groups. The
Sabha also played a key role in organising social movements like the Mahad
Satyagraha and Kalaram Temple Movement, which focused on ghting caste
discrimination. In the long run, the Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha laid the groundwork
for future movements that continued to empower Dalits, particularly through
education and social reform. Dr. Ambedkar’s creation of this organisation marked
the start of a larger movement, which inspired future generations of Dalits to ght
for social justice and challenge the deep-rooted caste system in India.

2. Mahad Satyagraha and Kalaram Temple Movement (1927-1930):

Dr. Ambedkar’s leadership in the Mahad Satyagraha (1927) and the Kalaram Temple
Movement (1930) was a direct challenge to the social norms that kept Dalits
segregated from the larger society. These movements sought to assert Dalits' right
to access public resources, such as water from the Mahad tank, and enter Hindu
temples without discrimination.
ff
ff
fl
fi
fi
The Mahad Satyagraha in particular was an important moment in public resistance
against caste-based discrimination. Although Ambedkar’s actions faced violent
resistance from upper-caste Hindus, it brought national attention to the issue of
untouchability.

Long-term Impact:

These movements helped pave the way for broader social reform and laid the
groundwork for Dr. Ambedkar's later legal and political campaigns for Dalit rights.
The Mahad Satyagraha was signi cant in spreading awareness about the need for
legal and social changes to end untouchability, a cause that Ambedkar would
continue to champion throughout his life.

3. Poona Pact (1932):

The Poona Pact of 1932 was one of the de ning moments in Dr. Ambedkar’s
political career. When the British government proposed separate electorates for
Dalits (the Communal Award), Dr. Ambedkar initially supported this proposal.
However, Mahatma Gandhi launched a fast unto death to oppose separate
electorates, fearing it would divide Hindu society. In response, Ambedkar and
Gandhi negotiated the Poona Pact, which resulted in reserved seats for Dalits in the
general electorate, rather than a separate electorate.

The Poona Pact represented a signi cant compromise, but in the short term, it
ensured that Dalits would have political representation within the existing Indian
political structure. Though it was a victory in terms of securing representation, it also
demonstrated Ambedkar’s ability to navigate the complex political dynamics of the
time, balancing Dalit interests with the broader Hindu community’s concerns.

Long-term Impact:

In the long term, the Poona Pact became a cornerstone of Dalit political
participation in India. It in uenced later reservation policies that allowed Dalits and
other marginalised groups to have guaranteed access to education, employment,
and political power. Dr. Ambedkar’s strategic decision to engage in the pact laid the
groundwork for the development of a rmative action policies in independent India.
fl
fi
fi
ffi
fi
4. Role in Drafting the Indian Constitution:

Dr. Ambedkar’s appointment as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the

Indian Constitution in 1947 was the culmination of his political journey. As the
principal architect of the Constitution, Ambedkar ensured that the principles of
equality, liberty, justice, and fraternity were enshrined in the document, making it
one of the most progressive in the world.

In the immediate aftermath, the Indian Constitution was a monumental step towards
the democratic and inclusive future of India. Ambedkar’s leadership in drafting the
Constitution helped guarantee fundamental rights to all citizens, particularly the
marginalised, through constitutional provisions like the abolition of untouchability,
reservations, and the right to equality.

Long-term Impact:

Long-term, the Indian Constitution remains one of Dr. Ambedkar’s most enduring
legacies. The legal framework he established has been instrumental in the ght for
social justice and Dalit rights in India. It also inspired global movements for civil
rights and social equity, cementing his place as a champion of human rights.

5. Hindu Code Bill and Advocacy for Women’s Rights:

In 1947, as the Law Minister in Nehru's cabinet, Dr. Ambedkar introduced the Hindu
Code Bill, which aimed to reform Hindu personal laws, particularly in areas such as
marriage, inheritance, and property rights. Ambedkar's goal was to grant equal
rights to women, particularly in terms of inheritance and the ability to divorce.

The Hindu Code Bill faced sti opposition from conservative Hindu groups and
ultimately failed to pass in its entirety. This led Dr. Ambedkar to resign from Nehru’s
cabinet in 1951, a decision that underlined his commitment to social reform, even at
the cost of political alliances.

Long-term Impact:

While the Hindu Code Bill was not passed in its original form, its key provisions
were later implemented through reforms in the Hindu Marriage Act (1955), Hindu
Succession Act (1956), and other laws. These laws granted women equal rights in
marriage, inheritance, and property ownership, marking a major step towards
gender equality in India.
ff
fi
 6. Conversion to Buddhism (1956):

One of the most signi cant decisions in Dr. Ambedkar’s life was his conversion to
Buddhism on October 14, 1956, along with hundreds of thousands of Dalits.
Ambedkar’s conversion was both a personal spiritual journey and a political act that
rejected the oppressive nature of Hinduism’s caste system.

In the short term, Ambedkar’s conversion sparked widespread social unrest. It led
to a massive Dalit Buddhist movement, as Ambedkar’s followers rejected the Hindu
caste system and embraced Buddhism as a means of social and spiritual liberation.

Long-term Impact:

Long-term, Ambedkar’s conversion to Buddhism helped shape a new social identity

for Dalits. It catalyzed the growth of the Dalit Buddhist movement, which continues
to inspire generations of Dalits to reject caste-based discrimination and embrace
the Buddhist path of equality. Ambedkar’s decision signi cantly in uenced the
social mobility of Dalits and promoted the values of equality, justice, and liberation.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's political career and social reform e orts spanned a wide range
of actions that brought about both immediate and lasting change. His ability to
navigate complex political terrain, his advocacy for Dalit rights, and his foundational
role in shaping modern India through the Indian Constitution make him one of the
most in uential leaders in Indian history. His decisions—from championing Dalit
rights through the Poona Pact to promoting women’s rights and establishing legal
frameworks for labor welfare—laid the groundwork for a more inclusive and just
society in India. Dr. Ambedkar's legacy continues to shape India's social and
political discourse, and his impact on human rights and social justice extends far
beyond the Indian subcontinent, making him a global symbol of resistance against
caste-based discrimination.
fl
fi
ff
fi
fl
Leadership Challenges and Criticisms: Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, one of India’s most in uential leaders, faced signi cant
challenges and criticism throughout his career. Despite his remarkable
achievements, his journey was not without obstacles, ranging from societal
opposition to public scrutiny and political disagreements. This essay explores the
major challenges Ambedkar encountered, his responses to them, and their impact
on his leadership.

Criticism of Dr. Ambedkar’s Ideology

One of the primary criticisms Ambedkar faced was his outright rejection of the
Hindu caste system. Many viewed his sharp critique of Hindu scriptures, particularly
the Manusmriti, as an attack on religious traditions. His public burning of the
Manusmriti in 1927 symbolised his ght against caste-based oppression but also
provoked widespread outrage from orthodox Hindus. Ambedkar’s decision to
openly challenge the religious foundation of caste led to him being labeled as "anti-
Hindu" by his critics.

Ambedkar did not waver in his stance. He believed that the caste system was
inherently discriminatory and needed to be dismantled for India to achieve true
equality. Instead of softening his rhetoric, he focused on educating the masses
about the social injustices perpetuated by these scriptures. His courage to confront
deeply ingrained norms demonstrated his conviction and strengthened his position
as a leader of the marginalised.

Political Isolation

Ambedkar’s independent political stance often isolated him from mainstream

political movements. He refused to align fully with the Indian National Congress or
the Muslim League, as he believed neither adequately addressed the concerns of
Dalits. His decision to form the Independent Labour Party (ILP) in 1936 was seen as
divisive by some leaders, who accused him of fragmenting the national movement
for independence.

Ambedkar defended his choice by emphasising that Dalit issues were distinct from
the broader freedom struggle. He argued that political independence would be
fi
fl
fi
 meaningless without social and economic equality for the oppressed classes. While
his stance isolated him politically, it reinforced his role as a leader who prioritised
the interests of Dalits over political expediency.

Opposition to the Poona Pact

Although the Poona Pact of 1932 secured reserved seats for Dalits in legislatures,
Ambedkar faced criticism from Dalits who felt he had compromised too much by
agreeing to Gandhi’s demands to abandon separate electorates. Critics argued that
the pact diluted Dalit political power and tied their representation to the goodwill of
the Hindu majority.

Ambedkar admitted that the Poona Pact was a compromise but defended it as a
pragmatic solution to avoid greater harm to the Dalit cause. He argued that separate
electorates, while ideal, were not politically feasible due to Gandhi’s opposition and
the resulting social unrest. This episode highlights Ambedkar’s ability to make
di cult decisions while staying committed to his broader goals.

Challenges in Drafting the Constitution

As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution, Ambedkar

faced criticism from multiple quarters. Some accused him of borrowing too heavily
from Western legal systems, claiming that the Constitution did not re ect Indian
traditions. Others criticised his emphasis on individual rights, arguing that it
undermined community values.

Ambedkar justi ed his approach by emphasising that a modern nation-state

required a framework that ensured equality and justice for all citizens. He argued
that tradition should not be an excuse for maintaining oppression. His response was
rooted in his vision of India as a democratic, inclusive society. Despite the
criticisms, his work on the Constitution remains one of his most enduring legacies.

Resignation Over the Hindu Code Bill

As Law Minister, Ambedkar introduced the Hindu Code Bill, which sought to reform
Hindu personal laws, granting women equal rights in marriage, inheritance, and
property. The bill faced erce opposition from conservative politicians and religious
groups, who argued that it threatened the fabric of traditional Hindu society. Unable
ffi
fi
fi
fl
 to secure enough support for the bill, Ambedkar resigned from Nehru’s cabinet in
1951.

Ambedkar’s resignation was a powerful statement of his commitment to social

reform. He refused to remain part of a government that did not prioritise gender
equality. While his resignation temporarily sidelined him politically, it reinforced his
image as a principled leader who would not compromise on his ideals.

Criticism of Conversion to Buddhism

Ambedkar’s decision to convert to Buddhism in 1956 was met with skepticism and
criticism. While many Dalits welcomed the move as a rejection of the caste system,
some critics saw it as divisive and questioned whether it would truly address the
social and economic challenges faced by Dalits. Others accused Ambedkar of
abandoning Hinduism for political reasons.

Ambedkar viewed his conversion as both a spiritual and political act. He argued that
Buddhism o ered a path to equality and liberation, free from the hierarchical
structures of Hinduism. His decision inspired millions of Dalits to embrace
Buddhism, creating a movement that continues to challenge caste-based
discrimination. By leading this transformation, Ambedkar demonstrated his ability to
use personal actions as a tool for social change.

Allegations of Elitism

Ambedkar’s Western education and association with elite institutions sometimes led
to criticism that he was disconnected from the grassroots realities of Dalit life.
Critics argued that his intellectual approach to social reform did not resonate with
the rural poor, who formed the majority of the Dalit population.

Ambedkar addressed these criticisms by focusing on practical measures such as

establishing schools and advocating for labor rights. His initiatives, like the
establishment of the People’s Education Society, were aimed at creating long-term
solutions for social mobility. While his intellectual approach may not have reached
everyone, his emphasis on education and legal reform had a lasting impact on Dalit
empowerment.
ff
 Handling Setbacks

Ambedkar faced numerous personal and professional setbacks, including health

issues and nancial di culties. Despite these challenges, he remained focused on
his mission. For example, his e orts to gain public access to water and temples
through the Mahad Satyagraha and Kalaram Temple Movement were met with
violent resistance, but he persisted in advocating for Dalit rights.

Ambedkar’s resilience in the face of setbacks showcased his determination and

strategic thinking. He used these experiences to re ne his approach, focusing on
legislative and institutional reforms to secure long-term change. His ability to learn
from failures and adapt his strategies enhanced his leadership.

Ambedkar’s responses to criticism and challenges were marked by a combination

of pragmatism and principled leadership. While some decisions, such as the Poona
Pact, were criticised as compromises, they demonstrated his ability to navigate
complex political realities. His uncompromising stance on social justice, even at the
cost of political alliances, solidi ed his reputation as a leader who prioritised his
values over personal or political gain.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s leadership was shaped by the challenges and criticisms he
faced. His ability to address these issues with resilience, strategic thinking, and
unwavering commitment to his ideals made him an extraordinary leader. While his
responses were not always universally accepted, they often strengthened his
leadership and advanced his vision for an inclusive and equitable society.
Ambedkar’s journey serves as a powerful example of how a leader can turn
adversity into an opportunity for meaningful change
fi
ffi
ff
fi
fi
Key Leadership Lessons and Application
1. Visionary Thinking and Strategic Planning

Ambedkar’s leadership was rooted in a clear vision of an egalitarian society free

from caste-based discrimination. He combined this vision with strategic planning,
whether it was in founding the Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha to empower marginalized
communities or advocating for legal safeguards for Dalits in the Indian Constitution.
His ability to anticipate long-term impacts while addressing immediate needs
demonstrates the importance of strategic thinking.

Modern Application:
Today’s leaders, especially in complex organisations or social movements, can learn
from Ambedkar’s emphasis on vision-driven action. Leaders must articulate a clear
vision that inspires and aligns diverse stakeholders while using strategic planning to
translate that vision into achievable goals.

2. Persistence in the Face of Opposition

Ambedkar faced erce opposition throughout his career, from societal rejection of
his ideas to political isolation. His ability to persevere despite setbacks, such as the
failure to pass the Hindu Code Bill, illustrates the importance of resilience and
adaptability in leadership.

Modern Application:
Leaders today must remain persistent in pursuing their goals, even when facing
resistance or failure. For example, in the corporate world, CEOs leading
transformative initiatives, such as sustainability transitions, often encounter
pushback from stakeholders. Learning from Ambedkar, leaders can stay committed
to their vision while nding creative ways to overcome barriers.

3. Inclusive Leadership and Advocacy for Marginalised Groups

Ambedkar’s leadership was characterized by his advocacy for the marginalized.

Whether championing Dalit rights or proposing progressive reforms like the Hindu
Code Bill, he prioritized inclusivity and social justice.

Modern Application:
Inclusive leadership is increasingly vital in today’s diverse workplaces and societies.
Modern leaders can apply Ambedkar’s approach by ensuring that underrepresented
voices are heard and creating environments that foster equity and inclusion. For
fi
fi
 example, leaders in multinational corporations can implement policies that support
diversity in hiring, career development, and decision-making processes.

4. Focus on Education as Empowerment

Ambedkar strongly believed in the power of education to uplift individuals and

communities. His e orts to establish educational institutions and advocate for
educational rights re ect his belief that knowledge is a fundamental tool for
liberation.

Modern Application:
Education remains a critical tool for addressing inequities. Leaders in policy-making
or social entrepreneurship can draw inspiration from Ambedkar by prioritizing
access to education and skill development, particularly in underserved regions. For
instance, tech leaders promoting digital literacy in rural areas mirror Ambedkar’s
e orts in a modern context.

5. Communication and Advocacy Skills

Ambedkar was an eloquent communicator and a persuasive advocate. His ability to

articulate complex ideas in simple terms made his messages accessible to diverse
audiences. Whether speaking in legislative debates or addressing mass gatherings,
he tailored his communication to resonate with his audience.

Modern Application:
In a world dominated by digital media and instant communication, leaders must
master e ective communication to inspire, educate, and mobilise. Ambedkar’s
emphasis on clear messaging is particularly relevant for leaders managing public
relations or addressing global audiences on platforms like social media.

6. Courage to Challenge Norms

Ambedkar’s leadership was de ned by his willingness to challenge entrenched

social norms. From burning the Manusmriti to converting to Buddhism, he took bold
actions to challenge oppressive structures.

Modern Application:
Modern leaders, especially in industries undergoing rapid change, can learn from
Ambedkar’s courage to question the status quo. Entrepreneurs disrupting traditional
business models or activists challenging systemic injustices can draw inspiration
from his boldness.
ff
ff
ff
fl
fi
 Application in Modern Leadership Scenarios
1. Social Movements and Advocacy

Ambedkar’s leadership o ers a roadmap for contemporary leaders advocating for

social justice. For instance, leaders in movements for racial equality, environmental
justice can emulate his ability to combine grassroots mobilisation with policy
advocacy. His focus on structural change, such as legal safeguards, highlights the
importance of addressing root causes rather than symptoms.

2. Organisational Leadership

In corporate or institutional settings, Ambedkar’s emphasis on inclusivity, resilience,

and education is highly applicable. Leaders can foster diverse and equitable
workplaces by implementing training programs, promoting underrepresented
groups, and creating inclusive policies. His ability to handle criticism and setbacks
also serves as a lesson for managing crises or stakeholder disagreements.

3. Political Leadership

Ambedkar’s approach to political leadership—prioritising marginalised voices and

addressing systemic inequities—is highly relevant for modern politicians. Leaders
navigating polarising issues, such as immigration or healthcare reform, can learn
from his ability to balance idealism with pragmatism while maintaining a clear moral
compass.

4. Crisis Management

Ambedkar’s response to challenges, such as the opposition to the Hindu Code Bill,
o ers lessons in crisis management. He demonstrated the importance of standing
rm on principles while adapting strategies to address immediate challenges.
Modern leaders managing crises, such as public health emergencies or nancial
downturns, can apply his approach by combining clear communication,
adaptability, and a focus on long-term goals.
fi
ff
ff
fi
Improving Ambedkar’s Strategies for Modern
Leadership

1. Leveraging Technology

While Ambedkar e ectively used the tools available in his time, modern leaders
have the advantage of technology. Ambedkar’s strategies could be enhanced in
today’s context by leveraging digital platforms for mass mobilisation, education, and
advocacy. For example, using social media to spread awareness or online learning
platforms to promote education aligns with his focus on outreach.

2. Collaborative Leadership

Ambedkar often worked independently or with a small group of allies. In today’s

interconnected world, collaborative leadership is increasingly important. Leaders
can build coalitions across sectors, ideologies, and geographies to address
complex challenges. Ambedkar’s legacy could be adapted by fostering broader
alliances for systemic change.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s leadership lessons transcend his era, o ering timeless insights
into vision-driven action, resilience, inclusivity, and courage. His ability to navigate
challenges, advocate for marginalised groups, and prioritise education serves as a
guide for modern leaders in various elds. By applying these lessons and adapting
his strategies to contemporary contexts, future leaders can create meaningful
change in a rapidly evolving world. Ambedkar’s life remains a powerful testament to
the transformative potential of principled, inclusive leadership.
ff
fi
ff
Conclusion

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was an exceptional leader whose impact transcended his era,
shaping India's socio-political fabric and laying the foundation for a more equitable
society. Through this study, we examined his leadership style, key decisions, and
the challenges he faced, uncovering how his strategic thinking and unwavering
commitment to justice set him apart as a transformative leader.

His role in drafting the Indian Constitution demonstrated his visionary thinking,
ensuring a robust framework for democracy, social justice, and equality. His
relentless advocacy for Dalit rights challenged centuries of entrenched caste
discrimination, o ering a voice to marginalised communities and fostering societal
change.

Dr. Ambedkar's leadership was characterised by resilience and adaptability. Despite

facing social ostracism and political opposition, he remained steadfast in his pursuit
of justice, exemplifying how a leader can turn adversity into opportunity. His
strategies for addressing crises, such as his decision to embrace Buddhism as a
means of rejecting caste-based oppression, highlighted his innovative and inclusive
approach to leadership.

The legacy of Dr. Ambedkar lies not only in his concrete achievements, such as
constitutional guarantees for equality and a rmative action, but also in the
inspiration he provides to future generations. His life underscores the power of
education, ethical leadership, and relentless advocacy for human rights.

In conclusion, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s leadership serves as a timeless example of how

vision, courage, and dedication can lead to enduring societal transformation. His
contributions continue to resonate, reminding us of the importance of inclusive
governance and the ongoing struggle for social justice.
ff
ffi
References

• Ambedkar, B. R. (1946). The Problem of the Rupee: Its Origin and Its Solution. Bombay:
Thacker & Co.

• Ambedkar, B. R. (1947). State and Minorities: What Are Their Rights and How to Secure
Them in the Constitution of Free India. Bombay: Thacker & Co.

• Keer, D. (2016). Dr. Ambedkar: Life and Mission. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan.

• Moon, V. (Ed.). (1990). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches (Vol. 1–17). New
Delhi: Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India.

• Jaffrelot, C. (2004). India's Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India.
New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Journal Articles

• Guru, G. (1998). Understanding Ambedkar’s Construction of the Indian Nation. Economic

and Political Weekly, 33(10), 573–580.

• Omvedt, G. (1995). Ambedkar and Buddhism: Reconstructing the History of Untouchables

in India. Sociological Bulletin, 44(1), 41–56.

• Thorat, S. (2005). Af rmative Action in the Indian Context. Economic and Political
Weekly, 40(24), 2420–2424.

• Zelliot, E. (1986). B. R. Ambedkar and the Search for a Meaningful Opposition. Modern
Asian Studies, 20(4), 705–728.

• Sharma, S. K. (2002). Ambedkar and the Dynamics of Social Reform in India. Indian
Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 65–76.
• Mallik, C. (2011). Justice and equality in Dr BR Ambedkars vision of India. In
Shodhganga. https://shodhganga.in ibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/165991

• Ambedkar, B. R. (1990). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches,

Vol. 7. Government of Maharashtra, Bombay, 243.

• Zelliot, E. (2008). Understanding Dr. BR Ambedkar. Religion compass, 2(5),

804-818.
fi
fl
• Sushmitha, R., & Chandra Keerthi, D. B. K. (2024). Ambedkar and His
Theories: From the Selected Works of Dr. BR Ambedkar. BR Ambedkar
(October 18, 2024).

Web Resources

• Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. (2020). Life and Mission of Dr. Ambedkar. Retrieved from
https://ambedkarfoundation.nic.in.

• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s

Contribution to Social Justice in India. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org.

• National Archives of India. (2018). Speeches and Writings of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Retrieved
from http://www.nationalarchives.nic.in.

• Kumar, A. (2012). Social Justice and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's Constitutional Vision (Doctoral
dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi).

• Patil, S. (2014). The Role of B.R. Ambedkar in the Social Transformation of Dalit
Communities in India (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pune).

• BBC News - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and His Role in Indian Politics , https://www.bbc.com/
news/world-asia-india-32617750

• The Hindu - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Articles and Analysis - https://www.thehindu.com/topic/

Dr-BR-Ambedkar

• Indian Express - Special Features on Ambedkar - https://indianexpress.com/section/india/

ambedkar/

• National Commission for Scheduled Castes. (2020). Dr. Ambedkar’s Legacy in Policy-
Making for Scheduled Castes and Tribes. Government of India.

Speeches and Primary Sources

• Ambedkar, B. R. (1951). On the Hindu Code Bill. Parliamentary Debates.

• Ambedkar, B. R. (1956). The Buddha and His Dhamma. Bombay: Siddharth College
Publications.

• YouTube : https://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=Wf3VJCpNMqI&ved=2ahUKEwiuxLDNwuWJAxUlxzgGHdELBR0QtwJ6BAgPEAI&
usg=AOvVaw3cYJ9Fuwz4mgiz_TmISBXe