College Construction Proposal
College Construction Proposal
July 1, 2011
Date
Description Completed
1.1 Title Page yes
2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist yes
3.1 Approval Page - FPP Proposal (original signatures) yes
3.2 Project Terms and Conditions yes
4.1 Analysis of Building Space--JCAF 31 yes
4.1A Quantities & Unit Cost for JCAF-32 yes
5.1 Cost Estimate Summary - JCAF 32 yes
5.2 Energy Calculator yes
6.1 California Energy Commission Audit yes
7.1 State Administrative Manual Requirements yes
8.1 CEQA Compliance yes
9.1 Outline of Specifications yes
10.1 Federal Funds Detail yes
11.1 Analysis of Future Costs yes
12.1 Campus Plot Plans yes
13.1 Diagrams of Building Area yes
13.2 Site Plans yes
13.3 Floor Plans yes
13.4 Exterior Elevations yes
13.5 Electrical Plans (as needed) NA
13.6 Mechanical Plans (as needed) NA
13.7 Building Cross-Sections (as needed) NA
14.1 Guideline-Based Group 2 Equipment yes
15.1 Justification of Additional Costs Exceeding Guidelines yes
16.1 Detailed Equipment List yes
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
District: San Bernardino Community College District College: Crafton Hills College
Project: Emergency Services (OE-2) Budget Year: 2013-2014
1. The applicant hereby requests State funds in the amount prescribed by law for the project named herein.
All parts and exhibits contained in or referred to in this application are submitted with and made part of
this application.
2. The applicant hereby certifies to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges that:
a. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001.5 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations
no part of this application includes a request for funding the planning or construction of
dormitories, stadia, the improvement of sites for student or staff parking, single-purpose
auditoriums or student centers other than cafeterias. The facilities included in the proposed
project will be used for one or more of the purposes authorized in Section 57001.5.
b. Any State funds received pursuant to this application shall be used solely for defraying the
development costs of the proposed project.
If the application is approved, the construction covered by the application shall be undertaken
in an economical manner and will not be of elaborate or extravagant design or materials.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 81837 of the Education Code, approval of the final plans
and specifications for construction will be obtained from the Board of Governors of the
California Community Colleges before any contract is let for the construction.
d. No changes in construction plans or specifications made after approval of final plans which
would alter the scope of work, function assignable and/or gross areas, utilities, or safety of the
facility will be made without prior approval of the Chancellor’s Office of the California
Community Colleges and the Department of General Services, Division of the State Architect.
e. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations, an
adequate and separate accounting and fiscal records and accounts of all funds received from
any source to pay the cost of the proposed construction will be maintained, and audit of such
records and accounts will be permitted at any reasonable time, during the project, at the
completion of the project, or both.
f. Architectural or engineering supervision and inspection will be provided at the construction site
to ensure that the work was completed in compliance with the provisions of Section 81130 of
the Education Code and that it conforms with the approved plans and specifications.
g. Pursuant to the provisions of State law, no State-funded construction contract shall be awarded
prior to approval of the project by the State Public Works Board and release of funds by the
State Department of Finance.
3. It is understood by the applicant that:
a. No claim against any funds awarded on this application shall be approved which is for work or
materials not a part of the project presented and approved by the State Public Works Board.
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
b. The failure to abide by each of the assurances made herein entitles the Board of Governors of
the California Community Colleges to withhold all or some portion of any funds awarded on
this application.
c. Any fraudulent statement which materially affects any substantial portion of the project
presented in this application, as it may be finally approved, entitles the Board of Governors of
the California Community Colleges to terminate this agreement or payment of any funds
awarded on the project presented in this application.
4. It is further understood that:
a. The appropriation which may be made for the project presented in this application does not
make an absolute grant of that amount to the applicant.
b. The appropriation is made only to fund the project presented in this application, as it is finally
approved, regardless of whether the actual cost is less than or equals the appropriation.
c. A change in the scope of the project or assignable areas shall only be granted with the approval
of legislature or its designated agent.
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Room Project Existing Increase in Space ASF Change WSCH Cost/ASF Total Allowable
Type TOPS Code DescriptionDepartment Space ASF Space ASF ASF Prior Submittal Capacity Cost
50 99 Inactive-General Assignment 891 -891 0 0 0
110 1201 Classroom-General Assignment 6,290 3,863 2,427 5,657 $446 2,805,340
210 1200 Laboratory-Health Occupations 1,350 1,350 631 $530 715,500
210 2100 Laboratory-Public & Protective Services 4,050 4,050 1,892 $446 1,806,300
215 2100 Lab. Serv.-Public & Protective Services 830 465 365 0 $446 370,180
215 4900 Lab. Serv. Interdisciplinary Studies 400 400 0 $464 185,600
220 2100 Special Class Lab.-Public/Protect. Serv. 1,200 1,208 -8 561 $446 535,200
230 4900 Ind. Studies Lab.-Interdis. Studies 1,488 1,488 579 $464 690,432
310 99 Office-General Assignment (Faculty) 1,080 1,332 -252 0 $471 508,680
310 6000 Office-Instructional Administration 160 160 0 $452 72,320
315 99 Office-Service 210 210 0 $471 98,910
680 99 Meeting Room 990 990 0 $444 439,560
740 2100 Vehicle Storage-Public/Protective Serv. 4,120 4,536 -416 0 $127 523,240
Total ASF 22,168 12,295 9,873
Total GSF 33,100 15,730 17,370 NA 9,320 $394.77 $8,751,262
CCI: 5394
EPI: 3016
QUANTITIES AND UNIT COSTS SUPPORTING THE JCAF 32
The District utilized two approaches for developing the cost estimate for the proposed OE-2 Replacement
project. One approach utilized the CCI Index 5394 as provided by the Chancellor's Office to determine
construction costs and the second appraoch was the preparation of an independent cost estimate
for the project from a private cost estimating firm. The first approach utilized the CCI Index 5394 as
provided by the Chancellor's Office to determine the construction cost. The second approach was to
obtain an independent cost estimate from a local cost-estimating firm.The two estimates, are within
10% (approx) of each other.
As justification and additional background data, the detailed analysis prepared by Cumming has been
included in the FPP in support of this cost estimate. The District will fund any project costs that exceed
the total proposed budget of $13,233,887.
Crafton Hills College - OE2 Replacement
San Bernardino Community College District
Yucaipa, California
660 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET • SUITE 900 • LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA • 90017
PHONE: (213) 408 4518 • FAX: (213) 408 4665
www.ccorpusa.com/
Crafton Hills College - OE2 Replacement
San Bernardino Community College District
Yucaipa, California
Rough Order of Magnitude Statement of Probable Cost May 5, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 3
2. Cost Summaries
Utility Service………………………………...….……………………………………… 11
INTRODUCTION
1. Basis Of Estimate
This statement is based on the Rough Order of Magnitude package as prepared by Steinberg (dated 3/16/11),
received on 4/19/11, along with verbal direction from the architect and engineer.
Consultant Reports: MEP Basis of Design (Rough draft dated April 28th, 2011)
2. Consultant Team
3. Scope of Estimate
The project comprises the construction of a new Emergency Services (OE 2) building that comprises teaching
labs, classrooms, offices and vehicle storage totaling 33,087 square feet.
A Specific Inclusions
Items which are detailed in the backup to this estimate include the following:
INTRODUCTION
B Specific Exclusions
Items which are not detailed in the backup to this estimate include the following:
Items which may change the estimated construction cost include, but are not limited to:
INTRODUCTION
5. Notes
Cumming has no control over the cost of labor and materials, the general contractor’s or any subcontractor’s
method of determining prices, or competitive bidding and market conditions.
This opinion of the probable cost of construction is made on the basis of the experience, qualifications, and best
judgment of a professional consultant familiar with the construction industry. However, Cumming cannot and does
not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from this or subsequent cost
estimates.
The statement reflects probable construction costs obtainable in a competitive and stable bidding market. This
estimate is based upon a minimum of four (4) competitive bids from qualified general contractors, with bids from a
minimum of three (3) subcontractors per trade. This statement is a determination of fair market value for the
construction of the project and is not intended to be a prediction of low bid. Experience indicates that a fewer
number of bidders may result in a higher bid amount, and more bidders may result in a lower bid result.
In accordance with industry analyses, it has been determined that the number of competitive bids obtained may
have the following effect:
Caveat emptor! The bid price is not necessarily the final cost. Please be advised that opening up the bid process
to all comers invites bid-day errors and "lowball" bids from potentially less-than-qualified bidders who will seek to
make their profit on the job via an unending stream of change order requests.
The Cumming staff of professional cost consultants has prepared this estimate in accordance with generally
accepted principles and practices. This staff is available to discuss its contents with any interested party.
INTRODUCTION
Cumming recommends that the Owner and the Architect carefully review this entire document to ensure that it
reflects their design intent.
Requests for modifications of any apparent errors or omissions to this document must be made within ten (10)
working days of the date of this estimate. Otherwise, it will be understood that the contents have been concurred
with and accepted. If the project is over budget, or there are unresolved budgeting issues, alternate systems /
schemes should be evaluated before proceeding.
Wherever possible and practical, this estimate has been based upon the actual measurement of different items of
work. For the remaining items, parametric measurements were used in conjunction with references from other
projects of a similar nature.
The gross floor area (GFA) quantities utilized herein were provided by the architect.
The unit costs enumerated herein are based on current bid prices in the Yucaipa, California area.
Subcontractor’s overhead and profit is included in each line item unit cost. This overhead and profit covers each
subcontractor’s cost for labor burden, materials and equipment sales taxes, field overhead, home office overhead,
and profit. The general contractor’s overhead and profit is shown separately on the Summary.
This estimate was prepared by a team of qualified cost consultants experienced in estimating construction costs at
all stages of design.
These consultants have used pricing data from the Cumming database for construction, updated to reflect current
market conditions in the Yucaipa, California area at the time the estimate was prepared. In some cases, quotes
were solicited from outside sources to substantiate in-house pricing data.
Subcontractor's Mark-ups
As stated earlier, subcontractor’s mark-ups have been included in each line item unit cost. Depending on the
trade, these mark-ups can range from 15% to 20% of the raw cost for that particular item of work.
INTRODUCTION
6. Prorates
General Conditions
A reasonable allowance based on 6% of the construction cost subtotal has been included for the contractor's
general conditions.
Contractor's Bonds
A reasonable allowance based on 1% of the construction cost subtotal has been included for the contractor's
payment and performance bonds (if required).
A reasonable allowance based on 1% of the construction cost subtotal has been included for the contractor's
general liability insurance.
Contractor's Fee
A reasonable allowance based on 4% of the construction cost subtotal has been included for the general
contractor's home office over head and profit. Site overhead is included in the general conditions.
None
Escalation
Phasing Allowance
Not applicable.
Construction Contingency
This is a part of the Soft Costs which have been excluded from this estimate but it is prudent for all program
budgets to include an allowance for change orders which occur during construction. These change orders
normally increase the cost of the project. It is recommended that the owner, in their program budget, carry a
percentage of anywhere from 5% - 10% of the construction cost for this construction contingency.
Prepared by Cumming Sheet 7 of 22
Crafton Hills College - OE2 Replacement
San Bernardino Community College District
Yucaipa, California
Rough Order of Magnitude Statement of Probable Cost May 5, 2011
E. Reconstruction N/A
$10,950,688
Schedule of Areas SF SF
Enclosed Areas
First Floor 33,087
Covered Areas
First Floor (Entrance canopies (x2) 1,400
Ratio to Gross
Control Quantities Qty Area
A Utility Service
Fire Water
Water line, 8" pvc C900 cl 200, incl t & bf 190 LF $103.46 $19,657
Fire hydrants 2 EA $5,172.97 $10,346
Post indicator valves 2 EA $3,621.08 $7,242
Gate valve, 6" 1 EA $840.61 $841
Fire department connection 2 EA $2,198.51 $4,397
Domestic Water
PVC, 4" pipe, incl t & bf 160 LF $60.78 $9,725
Water meter, 4" 1 EA $16,294.85 $16,295
Sanitary Sewer
6" Sanitary sewer line, incl t & bf 160 LF $80.18 $12,829
Manholes 1 EA $5,172.97 $5,173
Sewer cleanouts 1 EA $1,034.59 $1,035
Storm Drainage
12" PVC pipe, incl t & bf 500 LF $93.11 $46,557
Grate Inlet, 12" x 12" 2 EA $711.28 $1,423
Storm drain cleanout 2 EA $750.08 $1,500
Junction structure 1 EA $1,163.92 $1,164
Gas Piping
Medium pressure gas system, 4", plastic, incl t & bf 90 LF $60.78 $5,470
Gas meter 1 EA $5,431.62 $5,432
Hot/chilled water
Piping, inc trench & backfill: 90 LF $116.39 $10,475
Electrical
Extend electrical mains and connect to building 150 LF $142.26 $21,338
$180,899
$349,900
Vehicular paving
Heavy traffic, 3" AC over 12" AB 12,000 SF $7.76 $93,113
Pedestrian paving
Concrete paving, 4" thick, including sub base, reinforcement, and
integral color finish 18,000 SF $12.93 $232,784
Concrete curbs
Concrete curbs 500 LF $19.40 $9,699
Landscape
Grass, shrubs, trees, etc. 8,913 SF $7.76 $69,160
Miscellaneous
Site walls, planters, etc. 38,913 SF $3.23 $125,810
$537,032
1 Foundations
Excavation
Over excavation and recompaction of building footprint and 5' around
perimeter of building, depth of excavation is 5' 7,009 CY $10.35 $72,515
$334,683
2 Vertical Structure
Fireproofing steelwork
Sprayed fireproofing 101 T $355.64 $35,920
$453,896
Flat roofs
Structural steel wide flange girders and joists, assume 7lbs/sf 116 T $4,138.37 $480,051
Verco W3 3" metal deck, 20 gauge 33,087 SF $5.17 $171,158
Reinforced light weight concrete including mesh reinforcement with
steel bar reinforcement as required 33,087 SF $6.47 $213,947
Finish and cure concrete surface 33,087 SF $1.62 $53,487
Miscellaneous
Mechanical equipment pads located on roof 864 SF $19.40 $16,760
Miscellaneous metals, support framing and wood blocking 33,787 SF $1.29 $43,695
$1,336,917
4 Exterior Cladding
Block work
Reinforced CMU with burnished finish 19,996 SF $28.45 $568,913
Glazed aluminum framed windows with 1" insulated low "e" glazing 4,999 SF $109.93 $549,518
Canopy
Entrance canopies 1,400 SF $84.06 $117,685
$1,638,288
Insulation
Rigid board insulation, R-30, polyisocyanurate 33,087 SF $4.53 $149,763
Roofing
PVC membrane system 33,087 SF $7.76 $256,737
$488,725
Partition surfacing
Gypsum board, taped and sanded, 5/8" 49,350 SF $2.72 $134,025
Paint gypsum board surfaces and cmu 54,950 SF $0.91 $49,745
Sound insulation
Batt insulation, R-14 25,350 SF $1.03 $26,227
Sound caulking/acoustic sealants 33,787 SF $0.52 $17,478
$682,308
Floors
Sheet vinyl 17,987 SF $7.76 $139,569
Ceramic tile 1,500 SF $17.46 $26,188
Sealed concrete 6,100 SF $1.94 $11,833
Sealed and polished concrete 4,500 SF $6.47 $29,098
Carpet 3,000 SF $5.17 $15,519
Bases
Rubber, tile, etc. 33,087 SF $0.65 $21,395
Walls
Ceramic tile at restrooms, 48" height 1,000 SF $18.11 $18,105
Ceilings
Suspended gypsum board, including framing and paint finish 12,100 SF $12.93 $156,482
Acoustical ceiling tile, 2'x2' 21,687 SF $4.53 $98,163
$516,353
$401,886
10 Plumbing Systems
Sanitary fixtures 33 FX
Waterclosets 15 EA $1,681.21 $25,218
Urinals 5 EA $1,163.92 $5,820
Lavatories 10 EA $1,551.89 $15,519
Service sinks 1 EA $1,939.86 $1,940
Classroom sinks 2 EA $1,551.89 $3,104
Laboratory equipment
Standalone vacuum pumps, bottle racks, turret outlets, medical
piping, compressed air system, valves and specialties 1 LS $51,729.68 $51,730
Gas distribution
Including gas piping, valves and specialties, seismic shutoff valve 33,787 SF $0.86 $29,057
Miscellaneous
Fire stopping/core drilling 1 LS $4,176.04 $4,176
LEED commissioning assistance 1 LS $12,528.13 $12,528
Miscellaneous Plumbing 1 LS $1,282.29 $1,282
Project requirements 1 LS $25,056.26 $25,056
$460,647
Unit ventilation
Including galvanized sheetmetal ductwork 500 LB $13.64 $6,822
General rooftop exhaust fans, 5,300 cfm 1 EA $6,466.21 $6,466
Vehicle exhaust 1 LS $77,594.52 $77,595
Miscellaneous
Fire stopping/core drilling 1 LS $13,944.01 $13,944
LEED commissioning assistance 1 LS $7,511.08 $7,511
Miscellaneous HVAC 1 LS $3,755.54 $3,756
Project requirements 1 LS $11,615.90 $11,616
$1,431,228
Lighting
Including fixtures, emergency and exit lighting, exterior wall mounted
lighting, switches, occupancy sensors, photocells, feeder conduit
and wire 33,787 SF $15.52 $524,337
Power specialties
Including grounding, lighting control panels, etc 33,787 SF $0.84 $28,402
Telecommunications
Including telephone/data outlets - conduit and cable, terminal
backboards IDF/MDF, conduit backbone, wireless access terminals,
cable tray 33,787 SF $10.35 $349,558
Security
including access control, intrusion detection, CCTV monitoring,
command center, conduit and wire 33,787 SF $3.23 $109,237
Miscellaneous
Fire stopping/core drilling 1 LS $17,391.37 $17,391
LEED commissioning assistance 1 LS $52,174.11 $52,174
Miscellaneous Electrical 1 LS $1,609.80 $1,610
Project requirements 1 LS $104,348.22 $104,348
$1,914,660
$223,268
Fiscal Year Ann. Electrical Electricity to Annual Natural Gas TU Total Annual Gross Square Feet Weeks of Total Weeks Percent Reduction of Baseline Year
KWH Usage BTU Conversion Therm. Usage BTU's Consummed from Space Inv. Academic. Ops. of Operation Average BTU's Per GSF Per Week
2001-2002 3,704,018 12,641,813,434 99,402 22,582,013,434 $208,172 $ 44 51 2284 Baseline Year
2002-2003 3,495,729 11,930,923,077 99,813 21,912,223,077 208,172 $ 44 51 2216 -2.97%
2003-2004 3,363,566 11,479,850,758 84,941 19,973,950,758 219,212 $ 44 51 1918 -16.00%
2004-2005 2,696,955 9,204,707,415 67,826 15,987,307,415 $224,787 $ 44 51 1497 -34.44%
2005-2006 3,098,490 10,575,146,370 73,353 17,910,446,370 $224,787 $ 44 51 1677 -26.55%
2006-2007 3,362,580 11,476,485,540 75,406 19,017,085,540 $224,787 $ 44 51 1781 -22.01%
2007-2008 3,302,037 11,269,852,281 84,446 19,714,452,281 $224,787 $ 44 51 1846 -19.15%
2008-2009 3,222,798 10,999,409,574 66,406 17,640,009,574 $224,787 $ 44 51 1652 -27.66%
2009-2010 3,496,058 11,932,045,954 87,148 20,646,845,954 $224,787 $ 44 51 1934 -15.33%
1. Enter your electric and gas usage for 2001-02 and subsequent years. The spreadsheet will calculate your annual Btu use.
2. Enter your campus gross square footage from Space Inventory. Remove square footage that does not use electricity or gas.
3. Enter your normal weeks of Academic Operation.
4. Enter your total weeks of operation (add the Non-Academic Weeks of Operation to the Academic Weeks of Operation = 52 or less).
5. You are done. Save, print and send in with your 5YP & FPP. Since this is being submitted with your 5YP, your energy use data will be from the previous FY.
Other data should correspond as closely to this previous FY as possible.
This chart was created to allow campuses to add academic weeks without being penalized for the additional energy those weeks would add to the normal
calculation of the Energy Utilization Index (EUI); which is the Btu/sq. ft./year. In the normal calculation, the energy use would increase, but the square footage
would remain constant, thus resulting in a higher EUI. By factoring in the weeks of operation, the increase to the EUI is diluted.
There is the presumption that a Non-Academic Week uses about 50% of the energy of an Academic Week, therefore only half of the difference between the
number of Academic Weeks and the Total Weeks is added to the Academic Weeks to determine the 'total weeks' of operation for the calculation of the
Average Btu/GSF/Week.
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
The District has a current, on-going Energy Management Program in place. The program has
been in place since 1992 and is reviewed annually. With the passage of two local bond
measures, the district has upgraded the existing campus infrastructure to meet the energy
needs for all new facilities included in the campus master plan. This project is included in the
master plan and will be integrated into the existing campus-wide Energy Management System.
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
1
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
College is expected to increase by more than 47% from 80,380 WSCH in 2010 to 118,031
WSCH in 2017. The college has maximized its current facilities and cannot offer additional
classes to meet this ever-increasing demand from residents of the service area. Even with
limitations on funding, the college has expanded its instructional program into the late afternoon,
evening and weekends to address this unmet need. The long-term growth in student enrollment
for the District will be at Crafton Hills College. This project will assist in addressing the need
for additional facilities to accommodate this growth. The table below depicts the space array for
the proposed new facility and its associated capacity-load ratios.
This project will provide the following benefits to the academic program:
• Assists in addressing the shortage of campus-wide instructional lecture and laboratory
space at the college and specifically in the areas of Emergency Services, Public
Services and Health.
• Assists in addressing the instructional space needs associated with enrollment growth
of the college.
• Provides modern, up-to-date facilities which are more adaptable for new instructional
strategies.
• Provides facilities to support the joint educational programs between the college and
public agencies in the College’s service area.
In analyzing the possible solutions to the problem of inadequate instructional space for
the Emergency Services and related Health and Public Service programs, the following
strategies or options were considered as the basis for development of the project
alternatives:
• Limit the number of instructional offerings in these instructional areas based on the
existing instructional space. This solution will have the outcome of limiting the
enrollment of the College and not addressing the demand for additional classes or
meeting the employment needs of public agencies in the College’s service area
2
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
• Maximize the extended day and weekend instructional offerings. This solution has
the outcome of meeting the short-term needs of the program but has a finite limit
based on the current capacity and quality of the existing facilities.
• Reduce the instructional offerings in other areas of the curriculum and assign the
space obtained from the reduction to the Public Services programs. This solution is
viable for the Public Services programs but, at the same time, creates an outcome
that skews the overall instructional program. It is an outcome that would require the
College to address the issue of what is the balance in curriculum appropriate for the
College and residents of the service area.
• Consider adding temporary (Portable) facilities on the campus to address the short-
term need for additional space. The addition of temporary facilities is a short term
solution. The outcome is that you have the necessary space but has not addressed the
original problem of insufficient, permanent space for the Public Services
instructional programs.
The Master Plan addresses the long-term enrollment projection for the college and the
corresponding projection of the instructional program to meet the needs of the proposed
enrollment. The Emergency Services (OE-2) project is the first, new, instructional project
that is proposed to address the need for additional occupational/technical space based on the
3
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
campus. The College’s continued growth in enrollment validates the projections proposed in
the Master Plan and the Final Project Proposal (FPP) presented for this project.
The Solution Criteria lists options the College addressed in developing the
Educational/Facilities Master Plan and the accompanying requests for funding of the
proposed project. If the proposed project is funded, then the College will have taken the next
step in implementing the Educational/Facility Master Plan recommendations.
This facility will address the recommendation to integrate the use of technology into all
elements of the College’s instructional and support service programs. The desired outcome
is that this building will serve as a key facility for the continued growth and expansion of the
Public Services instructional program for residents of the College’s service area. It is a
critical element in the joint development of Public Service programs for all public entities in
the greater Redlands/ Yucaipa area of the District.
Without it, the college will be restricted in its effort to accommodate student growth, will not
be following the recommendations in the Master Plan and will not be able to provide the
necessary instructional programs required to be a viable institution of higher learning in one
of the fastest growing region in California.
B. ALTERNATIVES:
As part of the preliminary planning for this project, the College considered a number of
potentially viable alternatives. Non-viable alternatives, such as limiting the number of
instructional offerings and reducing the number of instructional offerings in other areas of the
curriculum to allow the Public Services programs to expand were not pursued following the
initial assessment of options.
Further complicating the problem is that the existing campus buildings are more than 35-
years old and were constructed in a manner that makes it fiscally and physically very difficult
to modify/remodel the existing size or re-configure the interior spaces in the existing
buildings. This inflexibility of the current facilities has a significant impact on the capacity
load ratios for the College and creates a false expectation that there is space available that is
not being used in the lecture and laboratory categories. A visual inspection of the buildings
confirms the problem with many of the current classrooms and laboratories in that they are
inappropriately sized to accommodate the larger class sizes needed to efficiently offer the
College’s instructional programs and/or the implementation of technology to support today’s
learning systems.
4
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
As shown on the Facilities Master Plan for the campus, the ideal location for the new,
proposed building is the current location of the present Emergency Services (OE-2)
facility (Space Inventory Building #7). This location requires the College to provide
interim or “Swing Space” as may be necessary to house the instructional programs during
the construction of the demolition and construction of the new building. In recognition of
this additional cost, the District is proposing that the cost of the “Swing Space” which is
anticipated to be as many as seven (7) temporary structures @ 960 gsf per modular, be
paid solely by the District as a non-state supported expense. The cost is estimated at
$1,671,500 and will be implemented, if needed, prior to the commencement of this
project. Under this alternative, the proposed new Emergency Services building is
designed as part of the new, vocational education core of the campus with convenient
access to the LRC and student service areas.. This alternative is the most cost-effective
solution for providing a new, permanent facility for the Emergency Services (OE-2)
instructional program.
Scope of the Alternative: The scope of this alternative is to construct a new, 22,168 asf
building to house the Emergency Services and related health and public service
programs. The existing OE-2 facility will be demolished. This project will anchor the
College’s commitment to a new, vocational education complex located at the Southeast
entrance to the campus. It will have the capacity to house all Public Service programs in
5
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Academic Program Impact: The proposed facility will help the college meet the
instructional space needs for the campus through the year 2025. No additional space will
be required for the Public Services and Health/Emergency Services programs. It will
allow the College to offer the curriculum, as designed and projected as part of the master
planning process, through 2025.
Facility Management Benefits: The upkeep and maintenance of the new facility may
require the College to slightly increase the level of staffing for custodial and maintenance
staff but this may be off-set by the design elements of the new facility and its
infrastructure. Since this is a new facility, the costs for major repairs and renovation will
not have a significant impact for the next 7-10 years. This option is consistent with the
Facilities Master Plan for the revitalization of the campus.
Source of Financing: The new facility is proposed as a 50% state and 50% local bond
funded.
2. Lease or jointly develop with other public agencies an off-campus facility for additional
instructional space for the Emergency Services and related Public Services programs.
This alternative is an option in term of economics, but one that does not seem to be viable
in terms of the instructional program for a comprehensive community college. The
Public Services instructional programs need to be an integral part of the campus learning
environment and are proposed as the central link to the majority of all vocational
programs offered by the College. As such, the facility must be strategically placed at a
highly visible, readily accessible location on the campus. There are significant
ramifications of locating the program off-campus not the least of which is the
disintegration of a comprehensive community college curriculum. However, if an off-
site location became necessary the following information would serve as the basis for
planning such a facility
Scope of the Alternative: The scope of the project is to develop a joint-venture with
another entity a 22,168 asf/33,100 gsf facility off-campus. The facility would be
identical to the proposed on-campus facility except that it would be at an off-campus
6
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
location. A joint venture, public services partner such as a County or a City, who has a
building site for the proposed facility, would need to be included as the joint venture
partner.
Academic Program Impact: Locating the facility off-site will allow the college to expand
the course offerings pursuant to the Educational & Facilities Master Plan. However, it
would have the impact of requiring students to attend core curriculum classes at more
than one location. This would create scheduling problems for students and increase the
probability of students taking fewer classes in a given semester thus reducing the
WSCH/FTES ratio for the College.
Facility Management Benefits: The benefits listed in Alternative One would also be
appropriate for this option. However, since it is an off-campus location, the logistics of
maintenance and support services will have an additional impact on the operating budget.
Source of Financing: The funding for the project would have to be from sources other
than the state and operating fund of the College. Subject to available funding, options
could involve the lease-purchase of the site and the building from a private partner.
Scope of Alternative: The proposed facility would be a 33,100 gsf temporary building.
Contained in the facility would be the same number of instructional spaces as proposed
for a permanent facility.
Academic Program Impact: If located on-campus, the impact would be that the College
has space to immediately expand the curriculum offering in Emergency Services and
related programs such as Health and Public Services. The long-term impact would be that
the programs housed in the facility will never be considered an integral part of the
campus. Students will have that perception typically associated with temporary facilities
of being on-campus but not quite equal to a permanent facility. This could lead to a
lower than expected enrollment in classes scheduled in the temporary facilities. Another
negative impact is that temporary facilities are also inconsistent with the master planning
of the campus.
7
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Facility Maintenance Benefits: Initially, the upkeep and maintenance will be minimal.
As the facility ages, there will be a need to upgrade and maintain the facility which will
have a greater than normal impact on the operating budget of the college. Temporary or
portable facilities do not provide a long-term solution for projects listed in the Facilities
Master Plan. They provide a short-term solution that is not eligible for state funding.
Source of Financing: The purchase of the facilities would require using operating funds.
Given the current level of funding from the state, it is not possible for the District to fund
the project from its general operating fund.
Scope of Alternative: Locate 22,168 asf of space in an existing, on-campus facility. This
may not be viable but it is an alternative that needs preliminary assessment. There are no
vacant buildings on campus. To move the Emergency Services program into a building
would result in the displacement of the current instructional programs housed in that
facility. A review of the capacity load ratios for space on the campus indicates the
College has no excess lecture or laboratory space. Therefore, the capacity load ratios for
the College would be projected to an even lower level than what currently exists.
Facility Management Benefits: Since this option would result in a remodeled facility,
major repair and maintenance costs would not have a significant impact for the next 7-10
years.
8
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
9
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Notes:
The Cost analysis for Option 1 is the proposed JCAF-32 for the project
The cost analysis for Options 2-4 are as follows:
A. Option 2: Off-campus, Joint-venture, Leased Facility:
1. Assume a 40-Year lease including building and parking to accommodate 200 students,
faculty and staff.
2. Construct the building in accordance with the JCAF-31 proposed for the project (22,168
asf/33,100 gsf) with all tenant improvements included.
3. Assume the parking formula will be 125 Vehicles/acre. Therefore, 1.6 acres will
be needed for parking. The cost of land for parking will be included in the lease
payments. The capital cost for parking improvements will be $1,700/space or
$340,000.
4. The 22,168 asf/33,100 gsf facility will require 0.9 acres of property.
5. The total site acreage with be 2.5 acres.
6. The facility will be built to DSA/CBC standards
7. The lease payment schedule will be a 40-year schedule with 3-year incremental adjustments of
10% in the lease rate.
8. The lease will not include the on-going cost of utilities or the cost of equipment. These costs
will be paid by the College.
9. The baseline factors for the lease are as follows:
a. The basic ground rent will be 8.0%/year of the land cost of $80,000/acre =
$6,400/acre or $12,800/year for the 2.0 acre site or $38,400 for the first three
years of the lease period. The ground rent for the 2.0 acre site for the 40-year
lease period, assuming the 3-year escalation factor, would be $712,000.
b. The basic cost for parking improvements will be $1,700/space or $340,000 for 200 spaces.
c. The base lease rate for the building will be ($1.30/gsf/month)(33,100 gsf) = $43,000/month
or $516,400/year for the first three years of the lease.
d. The total lease cost for the initial 3-year lease (Building & Parking) = $1,664,300.
e. If the lease payment is adjusted by 8.0% every three years for the 40-years of the
lease, then the total lease payment over the 40-year life of the lease would be
10
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
$23,800,000 plus equipment costs of $795,000 and “soft costs” of $500,000 for the
40-year lease period for a total project cost of $26,145,000.
(Note: This cost estimate does not include potential renegotiation of lease terms,
remodel costs or equipment replacement costs over the 40-year period)
10. Total Project Cost = $25,095,000
11
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
b. The cost of renovating the existing space is estimated at 70% of the cost of new
construction or $6,125,000 assuming similar classroom, laboratory and office
configurations and as based on the CCI 5394 Table of Costs.
c. The cost for replacing 22,168 asf of space in the existing building with new space is
essentially the cost of constructing the proposed project. However, due to differences
in the existing space in terms of disciplines and room use, the cost is slightly more
than the proposed new building. Based on CCI 5394 guidelines, the construction cost
for the new, replacement building is estimated at $9,000,000 or $406/asf.
(Construction costs only).
d. The equipment costs for this option are the same as for all options proposed for this
project with a cost of $795,000 as calculated from the JCAF-33 for the project. No
new equipment is budgeted for the programs that would be relocated.
e. The total time line for the option of a new facility plus the renovation project will be
approximately 14 months longer than if only a new facility were constructed as the
new facility would need to be built and occupied before the existing building could be
renovated. As an option, the concept of using temporary facilities to house the
programs that are to be relocated is presented. The cost for the temporary facilities is
estimated at $2,700,000. This cost would be off-set by the additional management,
supervision, general conditions and inspections associated with the longer
construction period. Using temporary facilities will reduce the overall timeline for
the project back to approximately a 12 month schedule saving the additional costs
associated with the extended construction period and the disruption to the educational
program at the College.
** All construction calculations based on CCI 5394 and EPI 3016.
f. Total Project Cost: $22,893,000
C. RECOMMENDED SOLUTION:
1. Which alternative and why?
The recommended solution is Alternative 1--to construct a new Emergency Services
(OE-2) Building. The reasons for selecting this alternative are as follows:
a. It is the most cost effective alternative for a permanent facility that is consistent with
the College Educational & Facilities Master Plan.
12
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
b. In the long-term, it is the most cost-effective solution because the cost of renovating
an existing facility to Title 5/Title 24 standards, plus the secondary effects (new
facility), is greater than the cost of just constructing a new facility for the proposed
programs.
c. It provides the best solution for the delivery of the Emergency Services and related Public
Services curriculum.
d. It provides the physical space necessary to support the efforts of the college to
respond to the increase in student enrollment and will have limited impact on the
students and faculty in terms of day-to-day activities on the campus.
e. A temporary unit provides a short-term solution but is not compatible with the
long-term Educational & Facility Master Plan for the College.
f. A new facility will result in only a limited increase in the operational budget for
the College and these costs will be covered by the increase in FTES generated by the
instructional programs.
13
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
b. The District will use the energy incentive allowance to design the proposed to a
minimum of LEED “Silver” rating. The 2% energy incentive for this project will be
used to assist in reaching this goal through funding of energy efficiency measures.
Energy efficiency measures to be considered include:
14
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Factors/Benefits for Recommending Project Other Than the Least Expensive Alternative.
As noted previously, the recommended alternative is the only alternative that is consistent
with the Facilities Master Plan for the college, is the best facility solution to meet the
needs of the instructional and support services of the College, and is the best solution to
meet the long-term instructional and technology needs of the College.
d. With respect to maintenance and operations, this project will add 9,873 assignable
square feet of space to the college inventory. Historical data indicates that this new
facility will not impact the deferred maintenance program until 2021. Because this is
a new facility, the design and construction will be in accordance with modern, energy
efficient systems and materials. This design should minimize the day-to-day
operating costs of the building.
15
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
2. Does the project improve the protection of environmental and agricultural resources
by protecting and preserving the state’s most valuable natural resources?
Response: Consistent with the provisions of AB 857, Chapter 1016, Statutes of 2002,
the California Community Colleges are exempt from these specific provisions of this
legislation.
16
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
An update to the original campus master plan was completed in 2006 and also the
Environmental Impact Report for the Plan has been completed. This update to the Master
Plan included the proposed Emergency Services (OE-2) Replacement project. The State
Clearinghouse Number is 2006011080 and the Notice of Determination was filed on
December 15, 2006.
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
OUTLINE OF SPECIFICATIONS
District: San Bernardino Community College District College: Crafton Hills College
01040 - Coordination
Requirements for coordination of Work of the Contract.
1
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
construction. Removal of concrete and bituminous surfaces. Remove materials and debris and dispose of legally
off-site.
02300 - Earthwork
Excavation for building and retaining foundations. Over excavation and re-compaction per soils report
recommendation. Preconstruction removal and stock piling of topsoil. Rough grading and contouring of site in
preparation for building excavation including cutting, filling and compacting. Import of fill material if required.
Excavation for building and retaining foundations. Backfilling required for building and retaining wall perimeters
up to subgrade elevations. Import or export of material if required.
02315 - Trenching
Excavation, backfilling and compaction of trenches for utilities to within 5 feet of building lines.
Requirements for excavation, backfilling and compaction of concrete filled utility trenches in sidewalk areas; as
provided under other sections.
Termite Control: Emulsified concentrate insecticide for dilution with water specially formulated to prevent
infestation by termites and not injurious to vegetation.
02620 - Subdrainage
Subsoil Drainage Piping: Polyethylene: Perforated corrugated polyethylene tubing, ASTM F405 and F667,
complete with fittings, couplings, filter fabric wrap, and joint materials. PVC: Polyvinyl chloride pipe, ASTM
D2729 or D3034, with three rows of 3/8 inch diameter holes spaced on 5 inch centers at 60 degrees apart.
Filter Fabric: Non-woven, geotextile fabric of polypropylene or polyester fibers. Water Flow Rate: 230 GPM/SF
minimum.
Subsurface Drainage Mat: Vertical grade drainage mat, polyester or polypropylene geotextile fabric bonded to
compression-resistant three-dimensional, non-biodegradable, single-sided, sheet polymeric core construction
designed to effectively conduct water to foundation drainage system.
2
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
02900 - Planting
Preparation of sub-grade including placement of topsoil, soil amendments, fertilizers, and final grading.
Planting of trees, palms, plants, ground covers, meadows and lawns with temporary support, mulching and
fertilizing.
DIVISION 3 - CONCRETE
3
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Structural Requirements: Employ professional structural engineer registered in State of California to engineer each
component of exterior wall system and to prepare and supervise preparation of engineering data for architectural
precast concrete system. Included are drawings, development of testing program, interpretation of test results, and
comprehensive engineering analysis showing compliance with performance and other Specification requirements.
DIVISION 4 - MASONRY
DIVISION 5 - METALS
4
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
05515 - Ladders
Vertical Ladders: Provide at elevator pit and roof access hatches. Structural Requirements: Comply with applicable
provisions of ANSI A14.3 for design, materials, fabrication and installation of component parts, and with
ANSI/ASME A17.1 ladder requirements at elevator pits. Stair treads: capable of withstanding concentrated 1000 lb
load without deformation.
5
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Kemlite Corp. “Glasboard”, Marlite Brand “FPR”, 1/8” thick, with manufacturer’s standard molding in color
matching panels.
6
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Spandrel Glass Insulation: Inorganic glass or mineral fiber semi-rigid board insulation. Location: Applied to
curtain wall spandrel glass.
Schedule: Provide minimum thermal resistance (R Values) for insulation in locations as follows:
1. Exterior Walls: Thermal resistance R Value of 19.
2. Roof Decks: Thermal resistance R Value of 30.
7
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Roof Hatch: Single leaf. Provide primed galvanized steel or aluminum body and door, liner insulation for door,
rigid insulation around body and hardware. Ladder Safety Post: Provide telescoping tubular safety post fabricated
from hot-dipped galvanized steel.
07840 - Firestopping
Make firestop and smoke seal assembly selections that comply with UL Fire Resistance Directory, authority having
jurisdiction, and applicable codes for: Materials, fabrication, and installation of firestops and smoke seals. Fire
containment. Fire resistant construction joints. Dynamic partition head details. Edge of slab and curtain wall
conditions. Penetrations through fire-rated floors, walls, and shafts. Duct and damper firestops.
Firestop voids and openings in applicable locations. Select appropriate systems with UL ratings for conditions
encountered, obtain approval from authorities having jurisdiction, and place identification label at each location
indication materials, rating, and UL assembly number.
Doors: Flush Doors: HMMA Type A; flush with continuous welded edge seams; full flush and flush with vision
panels. Stile and Rail: HMMA Type D; tubular stiles and rails with no edge seams; full glazed configuration.
Door Construction: Exterior: Minimum 16 gauge cold rolled steel conforming to ASTM A366 with hot-dipped zinc
coating per ASTM A526 G60. Interior: Minimum 18 gauge cold rolled steel conforming to ASTM A366.
Frames: Exterior: Minimum 14 gauge cold rolled steel conforming to ASTM A366 with hot-dipped zinc coating
per ASTM A526 G60; corners continuously welded full depth of frame. Interior: Cold rolled steel cold rolled steel
conforming to ASTM A366; corners continuously welded full depth of frame. Openings to 4 Feet Wide: Minimum
16 gauge. Openings Over 4 Feet Wide: Minimum 14 gauge.
8
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Rated Ceilings: Flush insulated steel door; self-closing and self-latching; bolt type latch operated by ring turn
or direct action knurled knob; interior latch release; one piece frame with exposed flange; 3-hour WHI
label; prime painted finish.
Access Doors in Gypsum Board Partitions:
Non-Rated Partitions in Utility Spaces: Flush steel door; one piece frame with exposed flange; key
operated steel cam lock; prime painted finish.
Sound Transmission Classification (STC): Provide sound retardant doors capable of achieving STC rating selected,
when tested in accordance with ASTM E90-75. Units are to be complete with doors, frames, seals, anchors and
hardware. Supply composite felt/elastomer sound seals, adjustable seal retainer, cover plates, threaded fastener and
appropriate door bottom sound seal.
Awning Windows: Steel; single web and tubular construction; 1-1/8 inch deep perimeter frame; 1 inch deep vent
frame; integral nail-on fin; square profile extruded steel glazing beads for 5/8 inch glass; Projected and
Casement Windows.
08800 - Glazing
Glass and glazing for wood doors, steel doors, wood windows, and steel glazed light frames. Requirements for glass
specified in other sections.
Flat Glass:
Clear Float Glass: ASTM C1036, Type I, Class 1, Quality q3; clear; 1/8 and 1/4 inch thicknesses.
Clear Tempered Glass: ASTM C1048, Kind FT, Condition A, Type I, Class 1,
Quality q3; fully tempered clear; 1/4 inch thick.
Heat Absorbing Tinted Glass: ASTM C1048,Type 1, Class 3, Quality Q3, Float
Type, tempered, light reducing in gray color; light transmittance of 42 percent, shading
coefficient of .51; ¼ inch thick.
Security Glazing; Laminated glass with poly carbon core & clear glass on outer faces.
Spandrel Glass: Float, ASTM C1036, Type 1, Class 1, Quality q5. Coating ceramic frit on No. 2 surface.
9
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
08830 - Mirrors
Unframed Mirror Glass: ASTM C1036, Type I transparent flat, Class 1 clear, Quality q2 mirror. Type: Annealed.
Thickness: 1/4 inch
Edges: Square and polished
Reflective Coating: Manufacturer's standard silver coating followed by electrolytic deposited copper coating and
separate coat of protective paint. Fasten with mirror adhesive.
Design Requirements: Metal stick framed systems with interior and exterior exposed metal framing. Fabricate
glazing systems for exterior glazing. Solar shades: Design solar shades as integral part of curtain wall system.
Framing Materials and Accessories: Aluminum: ASTM B221, alloy 6063-T5 for extrusions; ASTM B209, alloy
5005-H16 for sheets; or other alloys and temper recommended by manufacturer appropriate for specified finish.
Thermal Break: Manufacturer's standard non-metallic urethane insulating core, isolator spacers, or clip system to
provide thermal separation between exterior and interior components. Internal Reinforcing: ASTM A36/A36M for
carbon steel; or ASTM B308/B308M for structural aluminum. Inserts and Anchorage Devices: Manufacturer’s
standard formed or fabricated assemblies, steel or aluminum, of shapes, plates, bars or tubes. Glazing Gaskets:
Compression type design, replaceable, molded or extruded neoprene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or ethylene
propylene diene monomer (EPDM), ASTM C509 or C864 to maintain uniform pressure for watertight seal; black
color; factory molded corners required at exterior.
Solar Shades: Fabricate assemblies of extruded aluminum except where specifically noted otherwise. Provide steel
outriggers finished to match curtain wall. Isolate aluminum from steel surfaces to prevent electrolytic action. Field
bolt connections between frame members where necessary by solar shade size. Dress exposed welds smooth and
flush with adjacent surfaces. Fabricate fascia/nosing to match profiles indicated. Finish solar shade to match curtain
wall.
DIVISION 9 - FINISHES
10
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
11
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Resilient sheet flooring with integral cove base and resilient base for glue down carpeting with accessories.
Linoleum Sheet: ASTM F2034, Type 1. Homogeneous sheet linoleum of primarily natural materials consiting of
linseed oil, wood flour, and rosin binders, mixed and calendered onto natural jute backing. Thickness: 0.120 inch,
minimum overall. Heat Welding Rod: Color-matched welding rod.
Resilient Base: ASTM F1861, Type TP. Straight, toe-less type for carpet areas; set-on type with standard toe for
other areas. Thickness: 0.125 inch minimum, height as indicated in the Drawings. Corners field fabricated.
09680 - Carpeting
Yarn: Minimum 3 ply 100% continuous filament nylon with static control.
Meet Federal flammability Standard BOCFF1-70 and ASTM D 2859-70T.
Direct Glue-down with integral cushion and related accessories.
Provide primer, flashings, sealants, etc. as required to provide a complete system as shown on the drawings and per
manufacturer's recommendations.
09900 - Painting
Surface preparation and application of 3 coat finish system to exposed interior and exterior surfaces.
Exterior Surfaces:
• Uncoated Ferrous Metals: Semi-gloss acrylic enamel; one coat alkyd metal primer; two coats semi-gloss
exterior latex house paint.
• Shop Primed Ferrous Metals: Semi-gloss acrylic enamel; touch-up of shop primer with alkyd metal primer;
one coat alkyd metal primer; two coats semi-gloss exterior latex house paint.
• Galvanized Metals: Semi-gloss acrylic enamel; acid etch and rinse surfaces; one coat alkyd metal primer;
two coats semi-gloss exterior latex house paint.
• Hardwood and Plank siding: Semi-gloss acrylic enamel; two coats alkyd wood primer; two coats
interior/exterior latex semi-gloss enamel.
12
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
• Wood: Semi-gloss acrylic enamel; one coat interior alkyd enamel undercoat; two coats interior/exterior
latex semi-gloss enamel.
DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES
13
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT
DIVISION 12 – FURNISHINGS
.
DIVISION 13 – SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
14
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL
15060 – Piping
Piping Material:
• Chilled water and heating hot water piping: 3” and larger, Schedule 40 black steel pipe ASTM A53, type
ERW, grade B with thermal insulation to minimize heat gain or loss and prevent condensation.
• Chilled water and heating hot water piping: 2 ½” and smaller Type “L”, hard drawn copper tube.
Insulation shall be the same as the larger piping systems.
• Chilled water piping (below grade): pre-insulated PVC pipe (AWWA C900) with high density
polyethylene (HDPE) jacket and restrained joints. Insulation shall be factory applied 2” thick void free
polyurethane foam.
• Heating hot water piping (below grade): pre-insulated type K copper iron pipe with high density
polyethylene (HDPE) jacket and brazed/soldered joints. Insulation shall be factory applied 2” thick void
free polyurethane foam. Expansion control shall be provided by expansion control loops..
• HVAC Condensate Drain: Type “L” copper, insulated. Seamless copper tube. ASTM B88-96.
15
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
vapor barrier jacket. Insulation for all outdoor piping shall be covered with aluminum jacket.
15245 – Seismic Isolators
Vibration Isolators: Midland-Ross Superstrut or Pipe Shields, installed to prevent transmission of vibration to
structure, including seismic restraints
Urinals: Wall hung, vitreous china as manufactured by American Standard, Kohler or equal: similar to “Falcon”
No. F-5000.
Sinks: Counter mounted 18 gauge stainless steel as manufactured by Elkay, Just or equal.
Lavatories: Wall hung, vitreous china as manufactured by American Standard, Kohler or equal: “Wheelchair Users
Lavatory” No. 9141.011.
Service Sinks: Corner type precast terrazzo one piece by American Standard, Kohler or equal: Kohler Model No.
K-6710.
Drinking Fountains: Wall mounted, projecting type made of stainless steel manufactured by Haws or equal, model
1011HPS “Hi-Lo”.
Definitions:
HVAC: Heating, ventilating and air-conditioning.
EMS: Energy Management System.
Since the heating and air conditioning system is critically related to the function, industrial hygiene, capital cost,
operating cost and maintenance cost, it is important that the type of system be determined at the preliminary
planning stage. The selection of the type of heating and air conditioning system will require discussion between the
Architect, their Mechanical Engineer, the Facilities Engineer and Facilities Maintenance Director.
16
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Sound Levels:
• Design of air handling and other mechanical systems shall be such that sound levels in all occupied spaces
fall within the NC levels tabulated in the ASHRAE Guide for the occupancies involved.
Vibration Isolation:
• All rotating or reciprocating equipment (e.g. fan, motors, compressors, etc.) shall be furnished with
vibration isolation as dictated by program requirements.
• All vibration isolation devices shall be designed for seismic resistance in accordance with SMACNA
Guidelines for Seismic Restraint of Mechanical Systems.
• Ductwork, piping, electrical conduit, etc. shall be suspended with vibration isolating hangers if required to
control vibration in adjacent spaces as determined by program requirements.
•
15521 – Laboratory Compressed Air Equipments
Packaged Air Compressors and Receivers: Factory-assembled, wired, piped and –tested; electric motor driven; air
cooled; continuous duty; automatic control station; steel receiver tank; combination inlet filter silencer; refrigerant
type air dryer; air cooled, fixed bundle, tubular separators; ASME labeled safety valve; automatic drain valve;
bronze body pressure regulators; coalescing type compressed air filters.
15890 – Ductwork
Supply Air Ductwork: Supply air duct system shall be galvanized steel of minimum 4-inch water gauge pressure
class for mains. Branch ducts shall be minimum 2-inch class. Sealing, reinforcing and supporting shall be
according to SMACNA standards. Ductwork shall have thermal insulation to minimize heat gain, and prevent
condensation.
General Exhaust Ductwork: General exhaust duct system shall be galvanized steel of minimum 2-inch water gauge
pressure class. There shall be no insulation provided for exhaust ductwork.
17
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
All control panels shall be stand-alone in memory, networking, and control operations. The design of the controls
shall be in a modular format, permitting future expansion capabilities. The system shall monitor and control
equipment according to the sequence of operation, as well as additional input and output points. The building
control system shall operate to ensure operation safety, regulatory compliance and to satisfy process constraints as
well as occupant comfort.
Conventional VAV boxes with direct digital control shall be provided in laboratories free of fume hoods, offices,
classrooms, and other non-laboratory areas.
DIVISION 16 - ELECTRICAL
All electrical equipment doors are required to have concealed hinges and flush locks. All doors must swing in the
direction of egress.
Receptacles and Switches: 20A Heavy duty. Manufacturers: Cooper, Hubbell, Leviton and P&S.
All surface mounted boxes are required to be plumb and square in all three dimensions – floor, walls and ceilings.
Skewed boxes are unacceptable. Floor boxes are preferred to be Walker RFB4 Series with power fittings and
accessories. Cover is preferred to be Walker S36CCTCAL cover “Floor Port” Flanged Activation Kits with insert
areas to allow carpet and tile cutouts to match the finished floor.
18
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Above ground: Rigid conduit, IMC or EMT are acceptable. Rigid conduit is required in all outdoor locations, and
where conduit is exposed to physical damage.
All EMT conduit fittings shall be compression type. Screw type fittings are not allowed.
All power and fire alarm cables shall run in conduits. MC cables except for lighting whips (limited to 4 feet only)
are not allowed.
16510 – Lighting
Exit signs with LED type lamps are required.
Light fixtures: As shown on drawings or as indicated in fixture Schedule.
Lighting Controls: Douglas Lighting Control or Lighting Control and Design.
Day Lighting Controls: Step dimming ballast and photo sensors for automatic controls.
19
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Personnel Costs
Certificated:
The proposed project may increase the number of certificated staff assigned
to the programs and services proposed for this building. The funding for
these positions will occur as a result of the additional revenue from FTES
generated by the instructional program. It is anticipated the revenue will
offset the expenditures. Administrative staffing will remain the same.
Classified:
Program/Course/Services Approvals
List all new programs/courses/services to be housed in this project or its secondary effects and
give the date of approval. If there are no new programs/courses/services for which approval is
required, please so state. This is not required for “equipment-only” projects.
__________________None_______________________ ______________________
______________________________________________ ______________________
______________________________________________ ______________________
______________________________________________ ______________________
California Community Colleges
Final Project Proposal
Room Project Existing Increase in Cost/ASF per Gross Allowable Equipment Useable Total Allowable
Type # Rms 4 Digit Tops Code #/Name Space ASF Space ASF Space (ASF) Guidelines Cost in New Space/Progam Cost
110 8 0099-Classroom 6,290 3,863 2,427 $14.10 34,221 $3,600.00 30,621
210 1 1200-Laboratory-Health Occ. 1,350 1,350 $51.60 69,660 $7,200.00 62,460
210 4 2100-Laboratory-Public Serv. 4,050 4,050 $71.68 290,304 $19,500.00 270,804
215 2 2100-Lab. Serv.-Public Serv. 830 465 365 $71.68 26,163 $3,600.00 22,563
215 1 4900-Lab. Serv. -Ind. Studies 400 400 $205.02 82,008 2,200 79,808
220 1 2100-Special Class Lab. 1,200 1,208 -8 $71.68 -573 0 -573
230 1 4900-Ind. Studies Lab. 1,488 1,488 $205.02 305,070 0 305,070
310 6 0099-Office-Faculty 1,080 1,332 -252 $22.05 -5,557 0 -5,557
310 1 6000-Office-Inst. Adm. 160 160 $25.15 4,024 0 4,024
315 1 0099-Office-Service 210 210 $22.05 4,631 0 4,631
680 2 0099-Meeting Room 990 990 $22.86 22,631 1,200 21,431
740 1 2100-Veh. Storage-Pub. Ser. 4,120 4,536 -416 $0.00 0 0 0
99 1 0050-Inactive 0 891 -891 $0.00 0 0 0
29 Total ASF 22,168 12,295 9,873
Total GSF 33,100 15,730 17,370 832,582 37,300 $795,281
Total Equipment Allowance (This sum should equal the “Total Amount Needed” Column on Form B-25 ) Equipment Price Index: 3016
JUSTIFICATION FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS EXCEEDING GUIDELINES
New Construction (Including Group I Equipment) Reconstruction Equipment (Group II and Furniture)
District: San Bernardino Community College District_____ College: Crafton Hills College__________
Based on current construction costs (CCI 5394 and EPI 3016), it is anticipated that costs will not exceed the state guidelines for new
construction or equipment for this project.
Emergency Services (OE-2) --Equipment List
Location Qty. Item Description Unit Price Ext. Price
A detailed Equipment List with a value of $795,281 will be included upon initial approval of the Final Project Proposal
Page 1 of 1