0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views8 pages

Toc Unit-5

The document covers various concepts in computational theory, including P and NP-Complete problems, the Post Correspondence Problem, the Halting Problem, and the Universal Turing Machine. It explains the Chomsky Hierarchy of languages, decidability and undecidability, and provides examples of NP-Hard and NP-Complete problems. Additionally, it illustrates how to determine the complexity class of problems with examples like the Traveling Salesman Problem.

Uploaded by

suryasreeja4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views8 pages

Toc Unit-5

The document covers various concepts in computational theory, including P and NP-Complete problems, the Post Correspondence Problem, the Halting Problem, and the Universal Turing Machine. It explains the Chomsky Hierarchy of languages, decidability and undecidability, and provides examples of NP-Hard and NP-Complete problems. Additionally, it illustrates how to determine the complexity class of problems with examples like the Traveling Salesman Problem.

Uploaded by

suryasreeja4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

TOC UNIT-5

Author:Tagore
Co-Author:Nanaji
1. Collect and write short notes on P and NP-Complete problems

A.

1. P (Polynomial Time):
o Problems that can be solved by an algorithm in polynomial
time (i.e., their running time grows at most polynomially with the
input size).
o Examples of polynomial algorithms include constant-
time (O(1)), linear-time (O(n)), and quadratic-time (O(n^2))
algorithms.
o These problems are considered “efficient” because their
execution time remains reasonable even for large inputs.
2. NP-Complete:
o A subset of NP problems that are especially hard.
o A problem p is NP-complete if every other problem in NP can
be reduced to p in polynomial time.
o In other words, if we can solve an NP-complete problem
efficiently, we can solve all NP problems efficiently.
o The classic example of an NP-complete problem is the Boolean
satisfiability problem (SAT).
o Other NP-complete problems include the vertex cover problem,
the 3-coloring problem, and the subset sum problem.

2.What is a post-correspondence problem? Explain with an example

A.

1. Post Correspondence Problem (PCP):


o The Post Correspondence Problem is an undecidable problem
introduced by Emil Leon Post in 1946.
o It is simpler than the famous Halting Problem.
o In PCP, we have a set of dominos (tiles), each with a numerator
and a denominator.
o The goal is to arrange these dominos in a sequence such that the
concatenation of the numerators matches the concatenation of
the denominators.
2. Example:
o Consider two lists of dominos:
▪ List A: { 1, 10111, 10 }
▪List B: { 111, 10, 0 }
o We want to find a sequence of dominos such that the
concatenated strings from the numerators match the
concatenated strings from the denominators.
o Let’s analyze the solution step by step:
1. Start with the second tile (2):
▪ Numerator: 10111
▪ Denominator: 10
2. Add the first tile ( 2, 1):
▪ Numerator: 101111
▪ Denominator: 10111
3. Add the third tile (2, 1, 3):
▪ Numerator: 10111110
▪ Denominator: 101111110
4. Final solution: 2, 1, 1, 3
▪ Numerator: 101111110
▪ Denominator: 101111110
o As you can see, the strings match, so this sequence solves the
PCP for these lists.
3. Undecidability of PCP:
o The PCP is undecidable, meaning there is no algorithm that can
determine whether any given Post Correspondence System has a
solution or not.

3. What is the Halting Problem of the Turing Machine? Is it decidable or not?


Explain
A.
1. Halting Problem:
o The Halting Problem is a fundamental concept in the field
of computability theory.
o It revolves around the question: Given a program (or algorithm),
will it ever halt (terminate) when run on a specific input, or will it
run indefinitely
o In other words, can we design an algorithm that can predict
whether a given program will halt or not?
2. Undecidability:
o Alan Turing proved that the Halting Problem is undecidable.
o What does this mean? No algorithm exists that can correctly
determine whether any arbitrary program will halt or not for all
possible program-input pairs.
o Even though we can run a program and observe its behavior, there
is no general algorithm that can predict this behavior in advance.
3. Proof by Contradiction:
o Let’s assume that we have a magical machine called HM (Halt
Machine) that, given a program P and an input I, can tell us
whether P will always halt on input I or not.
o Now, consider feeding HM with its own description (i.e., HM itself)
and an input I.
o If HM says that HM halts on input I, then it should halt. But what if
it doesn’t halt? That’s a contradiction!
o Similarly, if HM says that HM doesn’t halt on input I, then it should
not halt. But what if it does halt? Another contradiction!
o Therefore, we conclude that no such magical machine HM can
exist

4. Explain about Universal Turing machine


A.
1. Definition:
o A UTM is a Turing machine that can simulate any other Turing
machine.
o It is capable of computing any computable sequence.
o The key insight is that we can encode the description of a Turing
machine using a finite-length binary string. This string represents
information about the state space, alphabet, and transition
function of the TM.
2. How It Works:
o Imagine a UTM as a “meta” Turing machine that takes two inputs:
▪ The description of another Turing machine (encoded as a
binary string).
▪ An input for that Turing machine.
o The UTM simulates the behavior of the specified Turing machine
using its own transition rules.
o It processes the input according to the simulated machine’s rules
and produces the same output as the simulated machine would.
o In essence, the UTM acts as a universal emulator for all possible
Turing machines.
3. Significance:
o The UTM concept is foundational in computer science and theory
of computation.
o It demonstrates that there exists a single machine capable of
performing any computation that can be described
algorithmically.
o The UTM is a theoretical construct, but it underpins the idea of
modern computers and their ability to execute diverse programs

5. Explain about Chomsky Hierarchy of languages?

A.
The Chomsky hierarchy is a fundamental concept in formal language theory,
computer science, and linguistics. It classifies formal grammars into four
distinct types, each capable of generating increasingly complex languages.

1. Regular (Type-3) Grammars:


o These grammars generate regular languages.
o Recognizing automaton: Finite-state automaton (either right
regular or left regular).
o Production rules: Simple rules with the form A → αB or A → α,
where A and B are non-terminals, and α is a string of terminals
and/or non-terminals.
o Example: Regular expressions and regular languages.
2. Context-Free (Type-2) Grammars:
o These grammars generate context-free languages.
o Recognizing automaton: Non-deterministic pushdown
automaton.
o Production rules: Of the form A → α, where A is a non-terminal,
and α is a string of terminals and/or non-terminals.
o Example: Programming languages’ syntax, XML, and context-free
languages.
3. Context-Sensitive (Type-1) Grammars:
o These grammars generate context-sensitive languages.
o Recognizing automaton: Linear-bounded non-deterministic
Turing machine.
o Production rules: More flexible than context-free grammars,
allowing context-dependent transformations.
o Example: Natural languages, certain compiler optimizations, and
context-sensitive languages.
4. Recursively Enumerable (Type-0) Grammars:
o These grammars generate recursively enumerable languages.
o Recognizing automaton: Turing machine (possibly non-
terminating).
o Production rules: No restrictions; can encode any computable
function.
o Example: All computable languages, including both decidable and
undecidable problems.

6. Write short notes on the following


i) Post-correspondence problem
ii) Halting problem

A.

1. Post Correspondence Problem (PCP):


o The Post Correspondence Problem is an undecidable problem
introduced by Emil Leon Post in 1946.
o It is simpler than the famous Halting Problem.
o In PCP, we have a set of dominos (tiles), each with a numerator
and a denominator.
o The goal is to arrange these dominos in a sequence such that the
concatenation of the numerators matches the concatenation of
the denominators.

Halting Problem:

• The halting problem deals with determining, from a description of an


arbitrary computer program and an input, whether the program will
eventually halt or run forever.
• Key points:
o The problem is undecidable; no general algorithm can solve it for
all program–input pairs.
o Turing machines are often used to formalize the problem.
o The essence of Turing’s proof is that any algorithm attempting to
solve this problem can be made to produce contradictory output.
• Universal Halting Problem: Determines whether a given program halts
for every input.

7. a)Solve the post-correspondence problem for the data given in the following table.
A B
1 1 111
2 10111 10
3 10 0
A.
o Consider two lists of dominos:
▪ List A: { 1, 10111, 10 }
▪ List B: { 111, 10, 0 }
o We want to find a sequence of dominos such that the
concatenated strings from the numerators match the
concatenated strings from the denominators.
o Let’s analyze the solution step by step:
1. Start with the second tile (2):
▪ Numerator: 10111
▪ Denominator: 10
2. Add the first tile ( 2, 1):
▪ Numerator: 101111
▪ Denominator: 10111
3. Add the third tile (2, 1, 3):
▪ Numerator: 10111110
▪ Denominator: 101111110
4. Final solution: 2, 1, 1, 3
▪ Numerator: 101111110
▪ Denominator: 101111110
o As you can see, the strings match, so this sequence solves the
PCP for these lists.

b) Write briefly about Decidability and undecidability problems

A.

1. Decidability:
o A problem is considered decidable if there exists an algorithm
that can always produce the correct answer (either “yes” or “no”)
for any given input.
o In other words, a decidable problem can be solved by a Turing
machine that halts on every input, providing a definitive answer.
o Examples of decidable problems include:
▪ Checking whether two regular languages are equivalent
(using set difference operations).
▪ Determining membership of a context-free language (using
dynamic programming algorithms).
▪ Verifying the emptiness of a context-free language by
examining its production rules.
2. Undecidability:
o Undecidable problems are those for which no algorithm can
provide a correct answer in finite time.
o While some problems may be partially decidable (or semi-
decidable), they will never be fully decidable.
o An undecidable problem may lead a Turing machine into an
infinite loop without ever providing an answer.
o Intuitively, these problems challenge our understanding of
computation and reveal inherent limitations.
o Examples of undecidable problems include:
▪ The halting problem, where determining whether a program
halts for a given input is impossible to solve algorithmically.
▪ Fermat’s Last Theorem, which states that no three positive
integers can satisfy the equation: (a^n + b^n = c^n) for any
(n > 2). Proving this theorem is undecidable
8. What are P and NP class of Languages? What is NP-Complete and give examples?

A.
1. P (Polynomial Time):
o The class P consists of decision problems that can be solved by
a deterministic Turing machine in polynomial time.
o In other words, if a problem is in P, there exists an efficient
algorithm that can solve it in a reasonable amount of time.
o Examples of problems in P:
▪ Checking whether a given number is prime.
▪ Sorting an array of elements.
▪ Finding the shortest path in a graph using Dijkstra’s
algorithm.
2. NP (Nondeterministic Polynomial Time):
o The class NP contains decision problems for which a non-
deterministic Turing machine can verify a solution in polynomial
time.
o While finding the solution itself might be hard, verifying a
proposed solution is relatively easy.
o Examples of problems in NP:
▪ The Traveling Salesman Problem: Given a list of cities and
distances between them, find the shortest route that visits
each city exactly once and returns to the starting city.
▪ The Satisfiability Problem (SAT): Given a Boolean formula,
determine if there exists an assignment of truth values to
variables that makes the formula true.
3. NP-Complete:
o A problem is NP-complete if it satisfies two properties:
▪ It is in NP (i.e., solutions can be verified quickly).
▪ Every problem in NP can be reduced to it in polynomial
time.
o If any NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time,
then all problems in NP can be solved efficiently.
o Examples of NP-complete problems:
▪ Hamiltonian Cycle: Given an undirected graph, find a cycle
that visits every vertex exactly once.
▪ Vertex Cover: Given a graph, find the smallest set of
vertices such that every edge is incident to at least one
vertex in the set.
▪ 3-Satisfiability (3-SAT): Given a Boolean formula in
conjunctive normal form (CNF), determine if there exists an
assignment of truth values to variables that satisfies all
clauses.

9. How to determine whether a problem is NP-Hard or P? Illustrate with an


example.
A.
1. P (Polynomial Time):
o Problems in the class P are those that can be solved efficiently by
a deterministic Turing machine in polynomial time.
o If an algorithm exists that solves a problem in P, it means the
problem can be efficiently solved.
o Examples of P problems include sorting, searching, and matrix
multiplication.
2. NP-Hard:
o A problem is considered NP-Hard if it is at least as hard as the
hardest problems in NP (non-deterministic polynomial time).
o In other words, solving an NP-Hard problem would allow us to
solve any problem in NP using a polynomial-time reduction.
o NP-Hard problems may not necessarily be in NP themselves.
o Examples of NP-Hard problems include the Traveling Salesman
Problem (TSP), Subset Sum, and the Turing Halting Problem.
3. Illustrative Example: Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP):
o Problem Statement:
▪ Given a set of cities and distances between them, find the
shortest route that visits each city exactly once and returns
to the starting city.
o Complexity:
▪ TSP is in NP because given a proposed solution (a tour), we
can verify in polynomial time whether it satisfies the
constraints (visiting each city once and returning to the
starting city).
▪ TSP is also NP-Hard because any NP problem can be
reduced to TSP in polynomial time.
o Reduction:
▪ Suppose we have an NP problem (let’s call it Problem Q).
▪ We construct an instance of TSP using Problem Q as
follows:
▪ Each city in TSP corresponds to an instance of
Problem Q.
▪ The distance between cities represents the
relationship between instances of Problem Q.
▪ If Problem Q has a solution, we set the distance to 1;
otherwise, we set it to a large value.
▪ Solving TSP for this constructed instance is equivalent to
solving Problem Q.
o Conclusion:
▪ Since TSP is both in NP and NP-Hard, it is NP-Complete.

You might also like