0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views39 pages

Asymptotic Notations

The document provides an overview of asymptotic notation, including definitions and examples of Big O, Big Theta, and Big Omega notations, which describe the growth rates of functions in relation to input size. It explains how to use these notations to analyze algorithm running times and includes properties and relationships between them. Additionally, it covers summation techniques relevant for calculating running times in iterative constructs.

Uploaded by

boyitsrider
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views39 pages

Asymptotic Notations

The document provides an overview of asymptotic notation, including definitions and examples of Big O, Big Theta, and Big Omega notations, which describe the growth rates of functions in relation to input size. It explains how to use these notations to analyze algorithm running times and includes properties and relationships between them. Additionally, it covers summation techniques relevant for calculating running times in iterative constructs.

Uploaded by

boyitsrider
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

Asymptotic Notation,

Review of Functions &


Summations
Asymptotic Complexity
 Running time of an algorithm as a function of
input size n for large n.
 Expressed using only the highest-order term
in the expression for the exact running time.
 Instead of exact running time, say (n2).
 Describes behavior of function in the limit.
 Written using Asymptotic Notation.
Asymptotic Notation
 , O, , o, 
 Defined for functions over the natural numbers.
 Ex: f(n) = (n2).
 Describes how f(n) grows in comparison to n2.
 Define a set of functions; in practice used to compare
two function sizes.
 The notations describe different rate-of-growth
relations between the defining function and the
defined set of functions.
-notation
For function g(n), we define (g(n)),
big-Theta of n, as the set:
(g(n)) = {f(n) :
 positive constants c1, c2, and n0,
such that n  n0,
we have 0  c1g(n)  f(n) 
c2g(n)
}
Intuitively: Set of all functions that
have the same rate of growth as g(n).

g(n) is an asymptotically tight bound for f(n).


-notation
For function g(n), we define (g(n)),
big-Theta of n, as the set:
(g(n)) = {f(n) :
 positive constants c1, c2, and n0,
such that n  n0,
we have 0  c1g(n)  f(n) 
c2g(n)
}
Technically, f(n)  (g(n)).
Older usage, f(n) = (g(n)).
I’ll accept either…

f(n) and g(n) are nonnegative, for large n.


Example
(g(n)) = {f(n) :  positive constants c1, c2, and n0,
such that n  n0, 0  c1g(n)  f(n)  c2g(n)}

 10n2 - 3n = (n2)
 What constants for n0, c1, and c2 will work?
 Make c1 a little smaller than the leading
coefficient, and c2 a little bigger.
 To compare orders of growth, look at the
leading term.
 Exercise: Prove that n2/2-3n= (n2)
Example
(g(n)) = {f(n) :  positive constants c1, c2, and n0,
such that n  n0, 0  c1g(n)  f(n)  c2g(n)}

 Is 3n3  (n4) ??
 How about 22n (2n)??
O-notation
For function g(n), we define O(g(n)),
big-O of n, as the set:
O(g(n)) = {f(n) :
 positive constants c and n0,
such that n  n0,
we have 0  f(n)  cg(n) }
Intuitively: Set of all functions
whose rate of growth is the same as
or lower than that of g(n).
g(n) is an asymptotic upper bound for f(n).
f(n) = (g(n))  f(n) = O(g(n)).
(g(n))  O(g(n)).
Examples
O(g(n)) = {f(n) :  positive constants c and n0,
such that n  n0, we have 0  f(n)  cg(n) }
 Any linear function an + b is in O(n2). How?
 Show that 3n3=O(n4) for appropriate c and n0.
 -notation
For function g(n), we define (g(n)),
big-Omega of n, as the set:
(g(n)) = {f(n) :
 positive constants c and n0,
such that n  n0,
we have 0  cg(n)  f(n)}
Intuitively: Set of all functions
whose rate of growth is the same
as or higher than that of g(n).
g(n) is an asymptotic lower bound for f(n).
f(n) = (g(n))  f(n) = (g(n)).
(g(n))  (g(n)).
Example
(g(n)) = {f(n) :  positive constants c and n0, such
that n  n0, we have 0  cg(n)  f(n)}

 n = (lg n). Choose c and n0.


Relations Between , O, 
Relations Between , , O
Theorem : For any two functions g(n) and f(n),
f(n) = (g(n)) iff
f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = (g(n)).

 I.e., (g(n)) = O(g(n))  (g(n))

 In practice, asymptotically tight bounds are


obtained from asymptotic upper and lower bounds.
Running Times
 “Running time is O(f(n))”  Worst case is O(f(n))
 O(f(n)) bound on the worst-case running time 
O(f(n)) bound on the running time of every input.
 (f(n)) bound on the worst-case running time 
(f(n)) bound on the running time of every input.
 “Running time is (f(n))”  Best case is (f(n))
 Can still say “Worst-case running time is (f(n))”
 Means worst-case running time is given by some
unspecified function g(n)  (f(n)).
Example
 Insertion sort takes (n2) in the worst case, so
sorting (as a problem) is O(n2). Why?

 Any sort algorithm must look at each item, so


sorting is (n).

 In fact, using (e.g.) merge sort, sorting is (n lg n)


in the worst case.
 Later, we will prove that we cannot hope that any
comparison sort to do better in the worst case.
Asymptotic Notation in Equations
 Can use asymptotic notation in equations to
replace expressions containing lower-order terms.
 For example,
4n3 + 3n2 + 2n + 1 = 4n3 + 3n2 + (n)
= 4n3 + (n2) = (n3). How to interpret?
 In equations, (f(n)) always stands for an
anonymous function g(n)  (f(n))
 In the example above, (n2) stands for
3n2 + 2n + 1.
o-notation
For a given function g(n), the set little-o:
o(g(n)) = {f(n):  c > 0,  n0 > 0 such that
 n  n0, we have 0  f(n) < cg(n)}.
f(n) becomes insignificant relative to g(n) as n
approaches infinity:
lim [f(n) / g(n)] = 0
n

g(n) is an upper bound for f(n) that is not


asymptotically tight.
Observe the difference in this definition from previous
ones. Why?
 -notation
For a given function g(n), the set little-omega:

(g(n)) = {f(n):  c > 0,  n > 0 such that


0
 n  n0, we have 0  cg(n) < f(n)}.
f(n) becomes arbitrarily large relative to g(n) as n
approaches infinity:
lim [f(n) / g(n)] = .
n

g(n) is a lower bound for f(n) that is not


asymptotically tight.
Comparison of Functions
fg  ab

f (n) = O(g(n))  a  b
f (n) = (g(n))  a  b
f (n) = (g(n))  a = b
f (n) = o(g(n))  a < b
f (n) = (g(n))  a > b
Limits
 lim [f(n) / g(n)] = 0  f(n)  (g(n))
n

 lim [f(n) / g(n)] <   f(n)  (g(n))


n

 0 < lim [f(n) / g(n)] <   f(n)  (g(n))


n

 0 < lim [f(n) / g(n)]  f(n) (g(n))


n

 lim [f(n) / g(n)] =   f(n)  (g(n))


n

 lim [f(n) / g(n)] undefined can’t say


n
Properties
 Transitivity
f(n) = (g(n)) & g(n) = (h(n))  f(n) = (h(n))
f(n) = O(g(n)) & g(n) = O(h(n))  f(n) = O(h(n))
f(n) = (g(n)) & g(n) = (h(n))  f(n) = (h(n))
f(n) = o (g(n)) & g(n) = o (h(n))  f(n) = o (h(n))
f(n) = (g(n)) & g(n) = (h(n))  f(n) = (h(n))

 Reflexivity
f(n) = (f(n))
f(n) = O(f(n))
f(n) = (f(n))
Properties
 Symmetry
f(n) = (g(n)) iff g(n) = (f(n))

 Complementarity
f(n) = O(g(n)) iff g(n) = (f(n))
f(n) = o(g(n)) iff g(n) = ((f(n))
Common Functions
Monotonicity
 f(n) is
 monotonically increasing if m  n  f(m)  f(n).
 monotonically decreasing if m  n  f(m)  f(n).
 strictly increasing if m < n  f(m) < f(n).
 strictly decreasing if m > n  f(m) > f(n).
Exponentials
 Useful Identities:
1 1
a 
a
(a m ) n a mn
a m a n a mn

 Exponentials and polynomials


nb
lim n 0
n  a

 n b o(a n )
Logarithms
a b logb a
x = logba is the
exponent for a = bx. log c (ab) log c a  log c b
n
log b a n log b a
Natural log: ln a = logea
log c a
Binary log: lg a = log2a
log b a 
log c b
log b (1 / a )  log b a
lg2a = (lg a)2
lg lg a = lg (lg a)
1
log b a 
log a b
a logb c c logb a
Logarithms and exponentials – Bases
 If the base of a logarithm is changed from one
constant to another, the value is altered by a
constant factor.
 Ex: log10 n * log210 = log2 n.
 Base of logarithm is not an issue in asymptotic
notation.
 Exponentials with different bases differ by a
exponential factor (not a constant factor).
 Ex: 2n = (2/3)n*3n.
Polylogarithms
 For a  0, b > 0, lim n ( lga n / nb ) = 0,
so lga n = o(nb), and nb = (lga n )
 Prove using L’Hopital’s rule repeatedly

 lg(n!) = (n lg n)
 Prove using Stirling’s approximation (in the text) for lg(n!).
Exercise
Express functions in A in asymptotic notation using functions in B.

A B
5n2 + 100n 3n2 + 2 A  (B)

A  (n2), n2  (B)  A  (B)


log3(n2) log2(n3) A  (B)
logba = logca / logcb; A = 2lgn / lg3, B = 3lgn, A/B =2/(3lg3)
nlg4 3lg n A  (B)
alog b = blog a; B =3lg n=nlg 3; A/B =nlg(4/3)   as n
lg2n n1/2 A  (B)
lim ( lga n / nb ) = 0 (here a = 2 and b = 1/2)  A  (B)
n
Summations – Review
Review on Summations
 Why do we need summation formulas?
For computing the running times of iterative
constructs (loops). (CLRS – Appendix A)
Example: Maximum Subvector
Given an array A[1…n] of numeric values (can be
positive, zero, and negative) determine the
subvector A[i…j] (1 i  j  n) whose sum of
elements is maximum over all subvectors.

1 -2 2 2
Review on Summations
MaxSubvector(A, n)
maxsum  0;
for i  1 to n
do for j = i to n
sum  0
for k  i to j
do sum += A[k]
maxsum  max(sum, maxsum)
return maxsum

n n j
T(n) =    1
i=1 j=i k=i

NOTE: This is not a simplified solution. What is the final answer?


Review on Summations
 Constant Series: For integers a and b, a  b,
b

1 b  a 1
i a

 Linear Series (Arithmetic Series): For n  0,


n
n(n  1)
 i 1  2   n 
i 1 2

 Quadratic Series: For n  0,


n
n(n  1)(2n  1)
 i 2 12  22    n 2 
i 1 6
Review on Summations
 Cubic Series: For n  0,
n 2 2
3 3 3 3 n ( n  1)
 i 1  2    n 
i 1 4

 Geometric Series: For real x  1,

n n 1
k 2 n x 1
 x 1  x  x    x 
k 0 x 1
For |x| < 1,

k 1
 x 
k 0 1 x
Review on Summations
 Linear-Geometric Series: For n  0, real c  1,

n n 1 n 2
i 2 n (n  1)c  nc c
 ic c  2c    nc  2
i 1 (c  1)

 Harmonic Series: nth harmonic number, nI+,


1 1 1
H n 1     
2 3 n
n
1
 ln(n)  O (1)
k 1 k
Review on Summations
 Telescoping Series:
n

a
k 1
k  ak  1 an  a0

 Differentiating Series: For |x| < 1,



k x
 kx  2
k 0 1  x 
Review on Summations
 Approximation by integrals:
 For monotonically increasing f(n)
n n n 1

 f ( x)dx  f (k )  f ( x)dx
m 1 k m m

 For monotonically decreasing f(n)


n1 n n

 f ( x)dx  f (k )  f ( x)dx
m k m m 1

 How?
Review on Summations
 nth harmonic number
n n1
1 dx
   ln(n  1)
k 1 k 1
x

n n
1 dx
   ln n
k 2 k 1
x

n
1
  ln n  1
k 1 k
Reading Assignment
 Chapter 4 of CLRS.

You might also like