Integrated Store Service Quality Measurement Scale in Omni-Channel Retailing
Integrated Store Service Quality Measurement Scale in Omni-Channel Retailing
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0959-0552.htm
omni-channel retailing
Min Zhang, Yiwei Li, Lin Sun and Farouk Adewale Moustapha 839
Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Received 4 February 2021
Revised 12 February 2021
Abstract 9 March 2021
25 October 2021
Purpose – Brick-and-mortar store is an essential channel to deliver a seamless shopping experience and meet Accepted 4 January 2022
customer’s dynamic needs in omni-channel retailing. This paper aims to understand customers’ expectations of
the integrated stores and develop a measurement scale to assess in-store service quality in omni-channel
retailing.
Design/methodology/approach – Grounded theory methodology (GTM) is employed to obtain a clear
picture of consumer expectations and preferences regarding the omni-channel brick-and-mortar integrated
stores. Then, an integrated store service quality scale is proposed, refined and validated using a questionnaire
survey and structural equation model (SEM).
Findings – The measurement scale is set to include seven dimensions: in-store environment, in-store
technology, product information consistency, employee assistance, personalization, channel availability and
instant gratification and return. The relationships among these seven dimensions and customer satisfaction
and loyalty are also verified. According to SEM, product information consistency is more important for
customer satisfaction while personalization contributes more to customer loyalty. The results demonstrate that
by analysing the seven dimensions, retailers can better understand customers and further improve service
quality.
Originality/value – This paper proposes a sufficient measurement scale for in-store service quality and fills
the gap in omni-channel retailing by capturing its integration attribute.
Keywords Brick-and-mortar store, Omni-channel, Service quality, Measurement scale
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The booming online channels and ongoing digitalization give rise to omni-channel retailing
(Verhoef et al., 2015), which has become a predominant norm of the retail industry (Zhang
et al., 2020). Meanwhile, the COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating seamless omni-channel retail,
with frictionless business trend permeating many aspects of the consumer journey. Retailers
who provide an integrated shopping experience merging the benefits of brick-and-mortar
stores with the online platform are known as omni-channel retailers (Rigby, 2011). They tend
to integrate activities within and across channels to suit the consumers’ shopping way
(Ailawadi and Farris, 2017). For the retailers, it is crucial to decide whether and to what extent
they may integrate the various channels (Cao and Li, 2018), as integration is the most
important factor affecting consumers’ perception of omni-channel retail service quality
(Zhang et al., 2019). Customers can benefit from online shopping, such as nearly limitless
selection, transparent price structure and product reviews. In the meantime, they also benefit
from brick-and-mortar store engagement, such as face-to-face interactions with the salesman,
available products for testing or trying on and the social experience of shopping as an event
(Rigby, 2011).
The evolution of retail formats is towards reducing friction in the customer journey and
enhancing customer experience, during which brick-and-mortar stores are constantly being
redefined (Gauri et al., 2021). Brick-and-mortar stores have been recognized as an important International Journal of Retail &
Distribution Management
Vol. 50 No. 7, 2022
pp. 839-859
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 72171166, © Emerald Publishing Limited
0959-0552
71572122). DOI 10.1108/IJRDM-02-2021-0056
IJRDM retailing channel with the majority of retail sales and close customer connections (Alexander
50,7 and Cano, 2020). In-store service is considered as the multichannel integrated service which
customers value the most.
Brick-and-mortar stores in a modern and multifaceted omni-channel environment are
significantly different from traditional stores (Li et al., 2020). Consumers who patronize a
brick-and-mortar store usually have been bombarded with rich information regarding goods
and services from other retailing or advertising channels (Grewal et al., 2017). However,
840 current research in service quality measurement focuses on the separate shopping
encounters of the online store or brick-and-mortar store. For example, Dabholkar et al.
(1996) proposed an instrument for measuring the service quality of the physical store, and
others paid attention to measuring the service quality of online service (Blut, 2016). Their
study may fail to give an appropriate scale for the store service quality without capturing the
integration attributes in omni-channel retailing. To fill this gap, our research aims to answer:
(1) what services do consumers really expect for brick-and-mortar stores under the omni-
channel retailing environment? (2) how will the perceived in-store service quality influence
customer satisfaction and loyalty?
The structure of this paper is as below. First, we review the literature on integrated store
and service quality measurement. Second, we utilize the grounded theory to identify the core
requirements of omni-channel retailing customers in an integrated store. Third, based on the
qualitative outcomes, we further propose a scale through items generating, refinement and
validation process to measure the integrated store service quality. Fourth, we test the
relationships among service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Lastly, we
summarize this paper and give theoretical and managerial implications.
2. Literature review
2.1 Integrated store in omni-channel retailing
The experience value created by brick-and-mortar stores for consumers has irreplaceable
advantages, but the development of interactive technology in online channels brought a great
shock on traditional retail settings (Ayotunde et al., 2021). In response to the fierce
competition and the change of consumer demands, traditional brick-and-mortar stores seek
to integrate with online and mobile channels and transform into integrated stores in omni-
channel retailing. The brick-and-mortar store can link all sales channels and provide an
integrated shopping experience (Piotrowicz and Cuthbertson, 2014), which further provides
interactive contact points to create and complete services, enhancing consumers’ perception
of service quality (Pantano and Viassone, 2015). The integrated store in omni-channel
retailing provides a place where different channels interconnect, and functions of
differentiated channels are integrated to perform service outputs, enabling consumers to
trigger omni-channel interactions (Zhang et al., 2019).
The advanced technology used in brick-and-mortar stores changes the traditional store
atmosphere in the domain of omni-channel retailing (Park et al., 2021). Advanced technology
deployment provides brick-and-mortar retailers with effective means to add value to the
consumer experience and improve service quality (Ayotunde et al., 2021; Grewal et al., 2020).
In the integrated store, customers connect with omni-channel retailers through several
channels, e.g. Internet, mobile device and brick-and-mortar stores within the same point of
sale (Paul et al., 2019). The quality of the channel integration affects customer engagement
which is related to repurchase intention (Lee et al., 2019). Thus, integrated stores win a
competitive edge by providing the opportunities of having synergies across channels. Some
studies also discussed the significance of integrated experiences in brick-and-mortar stores.
For example, Poncin and Mimoun (2014) investigated how to integrate new technologies into
brick-and-mortar stores and the impact on positive affective reactions. Bell et al. (2017) found
that showrooms in omni-channel retailing can attract customers and generate spillover Integrated
effects to the other channels, like increasing online shopping intention related to product and store service
financial risk (Johnson and Ramirez, 2020). Through mitigating consumer fit uncertainty,
physical showrooms provide shoppers with a complete and satisfactory experience (Li et al.,
quality
2020). To sum up, consumers’ perceived service quality in the integrated store is of vital
importance in shaping omni-channel consumption experience. However, current researches
rarely focus on service quality measurement in such integrated store.
841
2.2 Service quality measurement
A number of studies provided service quality measurement scales of brick-and-mortar stores
in both traditional retailing and online retailing. On the basis of the classical SERVQUAL
model established by Parasuraman et al. (1988), an RSQS measuring instrument offering mix
of services and goods was developed (Dabholkar et al., 1996). For the online retailing
environment, some e-service quality measurement scales have been empirically developed to
highlight the interaction between customers and websites. For instance, Kim and Stoel (2004)
proposed a six-dimension quality measurement scale for retail websites. Parasuraman et al.
(2005) provided the E-S-QUAL scale and E-RecS-QUAL scale. Collier and Bienstock (2006)
constructed a measurement for online retailing service quality. Blut (2016) studied a
hierarchical scale and Theodosiou et al. (2019) developed the e-SQ scale. With the
development of online platforms and new digital channels, retailers now provide more than
one retailing channel to offer competitive service. Sousa and Voss (2006) conceptualized
service quality for multi-channel retailing. Seck and Philippe (2013) empirically identified the
quality factors which can influence the overall customer satisfaction in multichannel service
distribution. Huang et al. (2015) proposed and empirically tested a multidimensional M-S-
QUAL scale to evaluate the mobile shopping experience for virtual and physical products.
Acquila-Natale and Iglesias-Pradas (2020) evaluated perceived quality in multi-channel
contexts. Patten et al. (2020) examined service quality in multichannel retailing of fashion by
evaluating physical service quality and electronic service quality.
Besides, technology development has closely embraced human and technology
interaction into service delivery systems known as the hybrid service system. Nasr et al.
(2012) explored the consumer value chain framework through various purchase phases in
hybrid contexts and finally came up with 18 dimensions to assessing service quality in the
hybrid delivery system. Ganguli and Roy (2013) evaluated service quality within hybrid
service settings.
As consumers are more inclined to look and experience the products they are buying, the
retailer’s brick-and-mortar store, in conjunction with its other channels, is an important part
of meeting customers’ multidimensional and dynamic needs of omni-channel shopping.
Measuring and improving the in-store service quality is crucial to deliver outstanding service
for customers. However, the literature reviewed above provides us with a better
understanding of service quality measurement in traditional stores and online retailing,
respectively. They seem to leave a research gap regarding the integrated characteristics of
retail stores. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (2019) developed the customer-perceived service
quality scale in the omni-channel retail context, but its global perspective failed to provide
specific guidance for service quality improvement of integrated stores. Thus, it is necessary
to propose a measurement scale of integrated store service quality in omni-channel retailing
environment.
3.2 Findings
Once the data is collected, grounded theory analysis is deployed by the basic steps including
open coding and axial coding as shown in Table 2. Finally, seven categories are identified as
in-store environment, in-store technology, product information consistency, employee
assistance, personalization, channel availability, instant gratification and return
respectively. Next, we will discuss these seven categories in detail.
3.2.1 In-store environment. Store atmosphere or physical attractiveness of the store has an
impact on affective and sensory store experiences and satisfaction (Bhatt et al., 2020). Prior
research identified five dimensions for measuring service quality in which tangible (physical
facilities) is an important factor of service quality (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Physical
environment encounters play an important role in omni-channel experiences, and the
diversity, aesthetics and comfort of the physical environment would have a positive impact
on consumers’ behavioural intentions (Ameen et al., 2021). Once omni-channel shoppers
arrive at a brick-and-mortar store, they are in contact with the retailer’s environment, and
their first impression could influence the customer purchase decision. Customers seek
physical stimulation from the in-store environment, specifically, from store design, visual
merchandising and haptics (Patten et al., 2020). The perceived store environment is also
positively associated with customers’ pleasure, arousal and shopping enjoyment (Hashmi
et al., 2020). From our grounded theory analysis, the finding that “customers are attracted by
the store environment” indicates that customers are more satisfied with the store if retailers
could provide an attractive and relaxing shopping environment.
3.2.2 In-store technology. In-store technology is mainly about digital terminals and tools
which have been implemented in brick-and-mortar stores to break the barriers between
physical and online stores for providing a frictionless shopping experience. In-store
technology is reshaping retailing (Shankar et al., 2020). Technology infused in stores aims to
increase customer in-store shopping experiences, especially that evoke high levels of
convenience and social presence would elicit higher levels of imagery, involvement and
elaboration (Grewal et al., 2020). The presence of technology also contributes to retail
environment design in optimizing customer experience (Alexander and Cano, 2020).
Report
Integrated
categories Title Year Source Links store service
quality
Survey On solid ground: brick and 2014 A.T. Kearney https://www.kearney.com/
mortar is the foundation of documents/20152/924670/
omni-channel retailing OnþSolidþGround.pdf/
1958eca8-df9f-da6e-a02d-
82f2039bbd63? 843
t51512665293410
The future of retail: How to 2014 McKinsey and https://www.mckinsey.com/
make your bricks with click Company business-functions/marketing-
and-sales/our-insights/the-
future-of-retail-how-to-make-
your-bricks-click
Building omni-channel 2017 McKinsey and https://www.mckinsey.com/
excellence Company industries/consumer-packaged-
goods/our-insights/building-
omnichannel-excellence#
Omni-channel consumer 2019 Accenture https://www.accenture.com/us-
experience boosts growth en/case-studies/consumer-goods-
services/omnichannel-consumer-
experience
Scaling the Store of the 2020 Boston https://www.bcg.com/zh-cn/
Future Consulting Group publications/2020/scaling-store-
of-future.aspx
Self-report Connected retail: How the 2013 EE Limited https://ee.co.uk/content/dam/
connected consumer is everything-everywhere/
reinventing retail documents/Connected-Retail.pdf
Walmart Inc. 2020 Annual 2020 Walmart Inc. https://s2.q4cdn.com/056532643/
Report files/doc_financials/2020/ar/
Walmart_2020_Annual_Report.
pdf
Insight Macy’s invests in new omni- 2014 Retail Touch http://www.retailtouchpoints.
channel strategies Points com/features/news-briefs/macy-
s-invests-in-new-omnichannel-
strategies
Lagging In-Store 2017 Retail Touch https://retailtouchpoints.com/
Personalization Cost Points topics/customer-experience/
Retailers $150 Billion In 2016 lagging-in-store-personalization-
cost-retailers-150-billion-in-2016
Consumers want “omni- 2018 Retail World https://retailworldmagazine.com.
channel” shopping au/consumers-want-
experience omnichannel-shopping-
experience/
Just How Mature Do You 2020 European https://www.esmmagazine.com/
Think Your Omni-channel Supermarket retail/just-mature-think-
Offering Really Is? Magazine omnichannel-offering-really-
92687
What’s in store for 2020 Accenture https://www.accenture.com/us-
shopping? en/blogs/business-functions-
blog/whats-in-store-for-shopping
Journal Competing in the age of 2013 MIT Sloan http://sloanreview.mit.edu/
paper and Omni-channel retailing Management article/competing-in-the-age-of-
book Review omnichannel-retailing/ Table 1.
Part source of surveys
(continued ) and reports
IJRDM Report
50,7 categories Title Year Source Links
For example, emerging AR and VR technologies help create immersive, vivid and interactive
shopping experiences, while AI provides intelligent service delivery solutions (Caboni and
Hagberg, 2019; Cai and Lo, 2020). Seamlessly inserting these technologies into experiential
contexts is the key factor for the brick-and-mortar store. With the advancements of
technology, retailers may offer more personalized and detailed shopping recommendations
and provide a more comprehensive product guide to their customers. Technology
empowerment plays a decisive role in improving consumers’ perceived in-store service
quality.
3.2.3 Product information consistency. In the omni-channel retailing context, customers
usually use all channels simultaneously as they search, buy and get support. In the shopping
process of interacting with multiple touchpoints, retailers need to consider the channel
holistically and provide a unified shopping experience for them (Savastano et al., 2019).
Customers can easily access countless online information for products inside a brick-and-
mortar store. As they travel interchangeably among channels, consistent, accurate and
timely product information can instil trust and brand identity and reduce customer loss due
to free-riding behaviour. Thus, the consistency of product information across channels is
very critical to achieve long-term customer loyalty.
3.2.4 Employee assistance. The omni-channel retailing business model will create very
knowledgeable consumers. For omni-channel shoppers, they head to the brick-and-mortar
store with online product information but the uncertainty of products. This means that the
store employees should be increasingly knowledgeable about the merchandise and online/
offline purchase procedures. Service excellence provided by store employees would affect
customers’ perceived value of transactions and improve service quality (Ameen et al., 2021;
Ertekin et al., 2020). The help and recommendation from store employees can be an important
propeller of both information confirmation and alternative product assessment of the buying
decision, and then decrease the perceived purchase uncertainty for customers (Conchar et al.,
2004). Sometimes, we might observe some loyal consumers who request more product
information from the salesman to confirm what he has obtained online before coming to the
store. By providing more accurate product details, the employee increases customer
knowledge and patronage intention, thereby the customer feels satisfied with the service.
Quotations Open coding Axial coding
Integrated
store service
“Transporting digital world into stores” In-store digitalization In-store technology quality
“Able to browse product ranges and order items Browsing through digital
through digital terminal while shopping in store” terminal in-store
“Touch screens become key components to the Order via digital terminal
in-store experience (kiosk and digital signage)” Important digital terminals in-
store 845
“Use smartphone while shopping in store to Learning more about product Product information
scan/tap to learn more about the product” Up to date product consistency
“Provide shoppers up-to-date product information and discount
information and coupons discounts” Product information
“Online and offline product information are consistency both online and
consistent” offline
“Customers check affordable price on a mobile Affordable price Price (Product
while in a store” Consistency of product price information consistency)
“Product price is consistent online and offline” (online and offline)
“Scan the bar code on the smartphone to verify
the price”
“Store provides in-store instant gratification, Providing instant Instant gratification
convenience” gratification
“Customer can buy online, but pick up in the Buying online and picking up
store” in-store
“Integrated store offers same day delivery” Same day delivery
“Able to return product to the nearest store” Returning product in-store Instant return
“Customer can buy online and return the item to Able to buy online and return
the store” in store
“Use physical and online stores during the Using meantime both online Channel availability
shopping journey” and offline
“Easy online access while shopping in store” Easy online access when in
“Stores advertise their websites at their local store
store (vice-versa)” In-store website
advertisement
“Retailers give personalized offer while entering Giving personalized offer in- Personalization
the store” store
“Customers receive special offers on their phone Offering special offers
while enter the store” Offering ads based on
“Store offers ads takes into account consumer’s consumer’s purchase history
previous purchase history”
“Employee assistance while shopping in store” Employee assistance Employee assistance
“More help from store employees when equipped More helpful when equipped
with tablets” with digital terminal
“Customers have employees assistance about Employee assistance about
the usage of website while shopping in store” online usage
“Customers are attracted by the store Attracting store environment In-store environment
environment” Providing a new store
“Store provides an environment that supports environment Table 2.
product discovery in a delightful, fun and Examples of the coding
relaxing way procedure
3.2.5 Personalization. Nowadays retailers are not only selling products but also keep in touch
with the customers to understand what they really need. Undoubtedly, modern omni-channel
consumers enjoy a personalized shopping experience, such as tailored offers that match their
buying habits. Personalization is an essential part of the shopping experience and has a
positive relationship with the cognitive and affective components of the shopping experience
IJRDM (Tyrvinen et al., 2020). Personalized incentives, including personalized consumer information,
50,7 services and rewards, are positively related to customers’ situational participation in omni-
channel retailing, thus creating usability and hedonic experiences (Hsia et al., 2020). Some
stores are using data-mining techniques and apps to assist their employees to accomplish
these kinds of activities for their customers. The technology-assisted personalization of
customers’ shopping experience has a positive effect on customer behaviour intention and
service quality evaluation (Ameen et al., 2021).
846 3.2.6 Channel availability. In omni-channel retailing, the natural boundaries between
channels become blurred and could be interchanged and used seamlessly in the whole
customer journey (Verhoef et al., 2015). The integration of websites and brick-and-mortar
stores has been considered as consumer engagement in cross-channel shopping. Omni-
channel consumers cross channels inherently during a single shopping experience, often
back and forth without even thinking they have done so. They do expect a unique shopping
experience by operating all channels together and require a consistent experience from a
retailer regardless of channels. The retailer embraces new technologies and channels to
provide seamless interactions between it and its customers. Each interaction is a part of the
overall customer experience with a retailer. Consistent experience may create trust in the
retailer.
3.2.7 Instant gratification and return. This dimension is subdivided into two types of
services: instant gratification (also known as Buy Online and Pick up in-Store “BOPS”) and
instant return (also known as Buy Online and Return in-Store “BORS”). Consumers can view
and pay online, then pick up goods at a brick-and-mortar store to have the tactile experience
of seeing and touching products and forgo delivery wait times. Many companies such as
Amazon, an absolute e-commerce retailer, are opening brick-and-mortar stores in some major
cities to fulfil the immediate gratification of omni-channel consumers. Although we hope that
the omni-channel purchase process is frictionless, it also can lead to the return for several
reasons, such as wrong item, wrong size or finding a defect. Omni-channel consumer coming
back to a brick-and-mortar store prefers the quick response and support from the retailer
concerning his/her return or exchange across any touchpoint as he/she likes (de Borba
et al., 2020).
Gender
Female 85 38.1
Male 138 61.9
Age
25 years or less 134 60
26–35 years 82 36.8
36–45 years 7 3.2
46 years or above / /
Level of education
High School or below 10 4.5
Junior college 40 17.9
Bachelor degree 132 59.2
Master degree or above 41 18.4
Occupation
Student 87 39.0
Enterprise employee 79 35.4 Table 3.
Institution staff 36 16.1 Sample
Else 21 9.5 profile (n 5 223)
IJRDM EFA CFA
50,7 EFA Item-to-total
Factors/Items Cronbach’s α loadings correlation Loadings p-value
5. General discussion
We develop a seven-dimension measurement scale to assess in-store service quality in omni-
channel retailing, including in-store environment, in-store technology, product information
In-store environment
Sat1
In-store technology
Consumer
Sat2
satisfaction
Product information
consistency 0
Sat3
Integrated store
Employee assistance 0.794***
service quality
Loy1
0
Personalization
Customer
Loy2
loyalty
Channel availability
Loy3
Instant gratification
and return
Figure 1. Note(s): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (two-tailed)
SEM results for Model fit statistics: Chi-square/df = 2.857, GFI = 0.890, AGFI = 0.838, CFI = 0.937,
nomological validity
RMSEA = 0.091
Bias-corrected 95% Percentile 95%
Integrated
confidence interval (CI) confidence interval (CI) store service
Variables Estimates SE z-value Lower Upper p-value Lower Upper p-value quality
Total Effects
Service 0.865 0.085 10.176 0.699 1.031 0.001 0.698 1.030 0.001
quality → Customer
loyalty 851
Indirect Effect
Service 0.700 0.146 4.795 0.468 1.074 0.000 0.433 1.001 0.001
quality → Customer
loyalty
Direct Effects
Service 0.166 0.164 1.012 0.164 0.497 0.259 0.164 0.497 0.259 Table 7.
quality → Customer Mediated effects in the
loyalty nomological model
Dependent variables
Independent variables Customer satisfaction Customer loyalty
6. Conclusion
For omni-channel consumers, what really matters is the experience that they have with the
shopping process. As an important channel in omni-channel retailing, brick-and-mortar
stores can strengthen customer awareness and loyalty for many brands in meeting
IJRDM customers’ multidimensional and dynamic shopping needs. Although some scales for
50,7 measuring brick-and-mortar service quality have been proposed, none of them can capture
the new endowed features of brick-and-mortar stores in omni-channel retailing. Based on the
grounded theory findings and prior literature, our research constructs, refines and tests a
seven-dimension instrument for assessing integrated store service quality in omni-channel
context. The relationships among service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty are
explored. This scale can fill out the research gap in service quality measurement and clarify
854 customer expectations to help the omni-channel retailers better evaluate their in-store
services.
References
Acquila-Natale, E. and Iglesias-Pradas, S. (2020), “How to measure quality in multi-channel retailing
and not die trying”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 109, pp. 38-48.
Ailawadi, K.L. and Farris, P.W. (2017), “Managing multi- and omni-channel distribution: metrics and
research directions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 120-135.
Alexander, B. and Cano, M.B. (2020), “Store of the future: towards a (re) invention and (re) imagination
of physical store space in an omnichannel context”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
Vol. 55, p. 101913, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101913.
Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Shah, M. and Madichie, N.O. (2021), “Going with the flow: smart shopping
malls and omnichannel retailing”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 325-348.
Ayotunde, O., Mizan, R., Nazrul, I. and Rajibul, H. (2021), “Smart mirror fashion technology for the
retail chain transformation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 173, p. 121118,
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121118.
Bell, D.R., Gallino, S. and Moreno, A. (2017), “Offline showrooms in omnichannel retail: demand and
operational benefits”, Management Science, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 1629-1651.
Bhatt, G., Sarkar, A. and Sarkar, J.G. (2020), “Attractive and facilitating store atmospheric stimuli:
validating the scales”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 48
No. 4, pp. 363-379.
Bitner, M.J. (1992), “Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 57-71.
Blut, M. (2016), “E-service quality: development of a hierarchical mode”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 92
No. 4, pp. 500-517.
Caboni, F. and Hagberg, J. (2019), “Augmented reality in retailing: a review of features, applications
and value”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 47 No. 11,
pp. 1125-1140.
Cai, Y.J. and Lo, C.K. (2020), “Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: a systematic review
and future research agenda”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 229, p. 107729,
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107729.
Cao, L. and Li, L. (2015), “The impact of cross-channel integration on retailers’ sales growth”, Journal
of Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 198-216.
Cao, L. and Li, L. (2018), “Determinants of retailers’ cross-channel integration: an innovation diffusion
perspective on omni-channel retailing”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 44, pp. 1-16.
Caruana, A. (2002), “Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer
satisfaction”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36 Nos 7-8, pp. 811-828.
Chin, W.W. (1998), “Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling”, MIS Quarterly,
Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 7-16.
Collier, J.E. and Bienstock, C.C. (2006), “Measuring service quality in e-retailing”, Journal of Service
Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 260-275.
Conchar, M.P., Zinkhan, G.M., Peters, C. and Olavarrieta, S. (2004), “An integrated framework for the Integrated
conceptualization of consumers’ perceived-risk processing”, Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 418-436. store service
Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A. (1990), “Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative
quality
criteria”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 3-21.
Dabholkar, P.A., Thorpe, D.I. and Rentz, J.O. (1996), “A measure of service quality for retail stores:
scale development and validation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24
No. 2, pp. 3-16. 855
de Borba, J.L.G., Magalh~aes, M.R.d., Filgueiras, R.S. and Bouzon, M. (2020), “Barriers in omnichannel
retailing returns: a conceptual framework”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Management, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 121-143.
Ertekin, N., Ketzenberg, M.E. and Heim, G.R. (2020), “Assessing impacts of store and salesperson
dimensions of retail service quality on consumer returns”, Production and Operations
Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 1232-1255.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Ganguli, S. and Roy, S.K. (2013), “Conceptualisation of service quality for hybrid services: a
hierarchical approach”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 24 Nos 9-10,
pp. 1202-1218.
Gao, F. and Su, X. (2016), “Omnichannel retail operations with buy-online-and-pickup-in-store”,
Management Science, Vol. 63 No. 8, pp. 2478-2492.
Gauri, D.K., Jindal, R.P., Ratchford, B., Fox, E., Bhatnagar, A., Pandey, A., Navallo, J.R., Fogarty, J.,
Carr, S. and Hpwerton, E. (2021), “Evolution of retail formats: past, present, and future”, Journal
of Retailing, Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 42-61.
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A.L. and Nordf€alt, J. (2017), “The future of retailing”, Journal of Retailing,
Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 1-6.
Grewal, D., Noble, S.M., Roggeveen, A.L. and Nordfalt, J. (2020), “The future of in-store technology”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 96-113.
Hair, J.F., Black, W., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hashmi, H.B.A., Shu, C. and Haider, S.W. (2020), “Moderating effect of hedonism on store
environment-impulse buying nexus”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Management, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 465-483.
Hau, K.T. and Marsh, H.W. (2004), “The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: non-
normal data and small sample sizes”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,
Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 327-351.
Herhausen, D., Binder, J., Schoegel, M. and Herrmann, A. (2015), “Integrating bricks with clicks:
retailer-level and channel-level outcomes of online–offline channel integration”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 309-325.
Hsia, T.L., Wu, J.H., Xu, X., Li, Q., Peng, L. and Robinson, S. (2020), “Omnichannel retailing: the role of
situational involvement in facilitating consumer experiences”, Information and Management,
Vol. 57 No. 8, p. 103390, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103390.
Huang, E.Y., Lin, S.W. and Fan, Y.C. (2015), “M-S-QUAL: mobile service quality measurement”,
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 126-142.
Johnson, O. and Ramirez, S.A. (2020), “The influence of showrooming on millennial generational
cohorts online shopping behaviour”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Management, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 81-103.
Keaveney, S.M. (1995), “Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 71-82.
IJRDM Kim, S. and Stoe, L. (2004), “Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality”, Information and
Management, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 619-633.
50,7
Lee, Z.W., Chan, T.K., Chong, A.Y.L. and Thadani, D.R. (2019), “Customer engagement through
omnichannel retailing: the effects of channel integration quality”, Industrial Marketing
Management, Vol. 77, pp. 90-101.
Li, G., Zhang, T. and Tayi, G.K. (2020), “Inroad into omni-channel retailing: physical showroom
deployment of an online retailer”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 283 No. 2,
856 pp. 676-691.
MacKinnon, D.P. (2008), Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis, Taylor & Francis Group, New
York, NY.
Mirzabeiki, V. and Saghiri, S.S. (2020), “From ambition to action: how to achieve integration in omni-
channel?”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 110, pp. 1-11.
Nasr, N., Eshghi, A. and Ganguli, S. (2012), “Service quality in hybrid services: a consumer value chain
framework”, Journal of Services Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 115-130.
Pantano, E. and Viassone, M. (2015), “Engaging consumers on new integrated multichannel retail
settings: challenges for retailers”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 25,
pp. 106-114.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for
measuring consumer perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1,
pp. 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Malhotra, A. (2005), “E-S-QUAL: a multiple-item scale for
assessing electronic service quality”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 213-233.
Park, J., Dayarian, I. and Montreuil, B. (2021), “Showcasing optimization in omnichannel retailing”,
European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 294 No. 3, pp. 895-905.
Patten, E., Ozuem, W. and Howell, K. (2020), “Service quality in multichannel fashion retailing: an
exploratory study”, Information Technology and People, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 1327-1356.
Paul, J., Agatz, N., Spliet, R. and Koster, R.D. (2019), “Shared capacity routing problem an omni-
channel retail study”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 273 No. 2, pp. 731-739.
Piotrowicz, W. and Cuthbertson, R. (2014), “Introduction to the special issue information technology in
retail: toward omnichannel retailing”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 18
No. 4, pp. 5-16.
Poncin, I. and Mimoun, M.S.B. (2014), “The impact of ‘e-atmospherics’ on physical stores”, Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 851-859.
Rigby, D. (2011), “The future of shopping”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89 No. 12, pp. 65-76.
Savastano, M., Bellini, F., D’Ascenzo, F. and Marco, M.D. (2019), “Technology adoption for the
integration of online–offline purchasing: omnichannel strategies in the retail environment”,
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 474-492.
Seck, A.M. and Philippe, J. (2013), “Service encounter in multi-channel distribution context: virtual and
face-to-face interactions and consumer satisfaction”, Service Industries Journal, Vol. 33 No. 6,
pp. 565-579.
Shankar, V., Kalyanam, K., Setia, P., Golmohammadi, A., Tirunillai, S., Douglass, T., Hennessey, J.,
Bull, J.S. and Waddoups, R. (2020), “How technology is changing retail”, Journal of Retailing,
Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 13-27.
Sousa, R. and Voss, C.A. (2006), “Service quality in multichannel services employing virtual channels”,
Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 356-371.
Theodosiou, M., Katsikea, E., Samiee, S. and Makri, K. (2019), “A comparison of formative versus
reflective approaches for the measurement of electronic service quality”, Journal of Interactive
Marketing, Vol. 47, pp. 53-67.
Trenz, M., Veit, D.J. and Tan, C.W. (2020), “Disentangling the impact of omni-channel integration on Integrated
consumer behavior in integrated sales channels”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 1207-1258.
store service
Tyrvinen, O., Karjaluoto, H. and Saarijrvi, H. (2020), “Personalization and hedonic motivation in
creating customer experiences and loyalty in omnichannel retail”, Journal of Retailing and
quality
Consumer Services, Vol. 57, p. 102233, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102233.
Verhoef, P.C., Kannan, P.K. and Inman, J.J. (2015), “From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel
retailing”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 174-181.
857
Xu, X. and Jackson, J.E. (2019), “Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-
channel retailing”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 216, pp. 118-132.
Yang, S., Lu, Y. and Chau, P.Y.K. (2013), “Why do consumers adopt online channel? An empirical
investigation of two channel extension mechanisms”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 54 No. 2,
pp. 858-869.
Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996), “The behavioral consequences of service
quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 31-46.
Zhang, M., He, X., Qin, F., Fu, W. and He, Z. (2019), “Service quality measurement for omni-channel
retail: scale development and validation”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence,
Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. S210-S226.
Zhang, T., Li, G., Cheng, T.C.E. and Shum, S. (2020), “Consumer inter-product showrooming and
information service provision in an omni-channel supply chain”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 51 No. 5,
pp. 1232-1264.
IJRDM Appendix
50,7
Item details of the integrated store service quality scale
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com