Law Charts
Law Charts
                                                                                                         Essentials of valid
                                                                                                          Offer/proposal
Since section 10 is not complete and exhaustive, so there are certain                    Omission/Abstinence
others sections which also contains requirements for an agreement
to be enforceable.
     Not given by Section 10 but are also considered essentials            (4) Classification of Offer
                         of valid contracts
 •     Two parties
 •     Intention to create legal relationship                                                         Counter                  Standing
 •     Fulfillment of legal formalities                                               General          Offer                     Offer
 •     Certainty of meaning                                                            Offer
 •     Possibility of performance
                                                                                                                     Cross
                                                                                                 Specific            Offer
(1) Meaning of offer/proposal
                                                                                                  Offer
As offer is the starting point in the making of an agreement. An offer
is also called as proposal. Thus, for a valid offer, the party making it
must express his willingness 'to do' or 'not to do' something.
                                                                    1
                                                                                                                 BUSINESS LAWS
                            General offer                                  Name of the Facts of the case                  Decision
 offer made to public at large and anyone can accept by performing         case laws
 the desired act
                                                                                                                          When he came to know
                        Special/specific offer                                                                            of the reward, which
                                                                                                                          had been announced in
 offer made to a specific / ascertained person, & can be accepted                                                         his absence, he brought
 only by that specified person                                                                                            an action against the
                             Cross offer                                                                                  defendant to claim this
                                                                                                                          reward. It was held that
 2 parties exchange identical offers in ignorance of each other's                                                         since the plaintiff was
 offer at the same time. It is not binding                                                                                ignorant of the offer of
                                                                                                                          reward, his act of bringing
                           Counter offer
                                                                                                                          the lost boy did not
 offeree offers to qualified acceptance of the offer subject to                                                           amount to the acceptance
 modifications and variations in the terms of original offer. Counter-                                                    of the offer and therefore
 offer amounts to rejection of the original offer                                                                         he was not entitled to
                                                                                                                          claim the reward.
                 Standing / continuing / open offer
 An offer of continuous nature which remains open for acceptance           Boulton Vs.     Boulton had taken              Held: Jones is not liable
 over a period of time                                                     Jones           over the business of           to pay for the good. It is
                                                                                           one       Brocklehurst,
                                                                                                                          a rule of law that offer
                                                                                           with whom Jones had
Important case laws                                                                        previous       dealings.       made to a specific /
                                                                                           Jones sent an order for        ascertained person can
Name of the Facts of the case               Decision
                                                                                           goods to Brocklehurst,         be accepted only by that
case laws
                                                                                           which Boulton supplied         specified person.
Carlill Vs.     In this famous case,        Held, she could recover                        without       informing
Carbolic        Carbolic smoke Ball Co.     the amount as by using                         Jones that the business
Smoke Ball      advertised in several       the smoke balls she                            had changed hands.
Co.             newspapers       that   a   had accepted the offer.                        When Jones found
                reward of £100 would be     In terms of Sec. 8 of the                      out that the goods
                given to any person who     Indian Contract Act,                           had not come from
                contracted      influenza   anyone performing the                          Brocklehurst,         he
                after using the smoke       conditions of the offer                        refused to pay for
                balls produced by the       can be considered to                           them and was sued by
                Carbolic Smoke Ball         have accepted the offer.                       Boulton for the price.
                Company        according    Until the general offer is
                to printed directions.      retracted or withdrawn,        (5) Difference between Offer and Invitation to Offer, and
                One lady, Mrs. Carlill,     it can be accepted by          Invitation to Treat
                used the smoke balls        anyone at any time as it is
                as per the directions of    a continuing offer.            Case laws       Facts of the case               Decision
                company and even then                                      Harvey Vs.      In this case, Privy Council     Held that the mere
                suffered from influenza.                                   Facie           briefly     explained    the    statement of the lowest
Lalman          Gauri Dutt sent his         Held, he was not entitled                      distinction between an          price at which the vendor
Shukla Vs.      servant Lalman to trace     to the reward, as he                           offer and an invitation to      would sell contained no
Gauri Dutt      his missing nephew. He      did not know the offer.                        offer. In the given case,       implied contract to sell
                then announced that         Section 4 of the Indian                        the plaintiffs through          to the person who had
                anybody who traced          Contract Act states that                       a telegram asked the            enquired about the price.
                his nephew would be         the communication of                           defendants two questions
                entitled to a certain       a proposal is complete                         namely,
                reward. Lalman traced       when it comes to the                           (i) Will you sell us
                the boy in ignorance        knowledge of the person                             Bumper Hall Pen? and
                of this announcement.       to whom it is made.                            (ii) Telegraph lowest cash
                Subsequently when he                                                            price.
                                            In Lalman case, the                            The defendants replied
                came to know of the         defendant’s      nephew
                reward, he claimed it.                                                     through telegram that the
                                            absconded from home.                           “lowest price for Bumper
                                            The plaintiff who was                          Hall Pen is ₤900”. The
                                            defendant’s servant was                        plaintiffs sent another
                                            sent to search for the                         telegram stating “we agree
                                            missing boy.
                                                                                           to buy Bumper Hall Pen
                                            After the plaintiff had left                   at ₤900”. However, the
                                            in search of the boy, the                      defendants refused to sell
                                            defendant      announced                       the property at the price.
                                            a reward of Rs. 501 to                         The plaintiffs sued the
                                            anyone who might find                          defendants contending that
                                            out the boy. The plaintiff                     they had made an offer to
                                            who was unaware of this                        sell the property at ₤900
                                            reward, was successful in                      and therefore they are
                                            searching the boy.                             bound by the offer.
     No term of the non compliance amounting to Acceptance                    Neale Vs.       M offered to sell his land          It was held that N
                                                                              Merret          to N for £280. N replied            could not enforce his
(7) Acceptance                                                                                purporting to accept the            acceptance because it
                                                                                              offer but enclosed a cheque         was not an unqualified
                                                                                              for £ 80 only. He promised          one
                                                                                              to pay the balance of £ 200
   person to whom            Signifies his          Proposal is said                          by monthly installments of
    the Proposal is         Assent thereto          to be Accepted                            £ 50 each.
         made
                                                                       3
                                                                                                               BUSINESS LAWS
Case laws      Facts                          Decision                    (12) When is communication of acceptance complete?
Brogden vs.    Brogden a supplier, sent a     Held, that there     was         As against the Proposer-
Metropolitan   draft agreement relating       no contract as       the
               to the supply of coal to the                                    when put in course of transmission to the Proposer
                                              manager had          not
Railway Co.    manager of railway Co. viz,    communicated          his        As against the Acceptor
               Metropolitian railway for
               his acceptance.                acceptance to        the
                                              supplier, Brogden.
                                                                               when it comes to the knowledge of the Proposer
               The manager wrote the
               word “Approved” on the                                     (13) Communication of acceptance by post
               same and put the draft
               agreement in the drawer                                         As against the Proposer-              As against the Acceptor
               of the table
                Intending to send it to                                     when the letter of                     when the letter reaches the
               the company’s solicitors                                     acceptance is posted                   proposer
               for a formal contract to
               be drawn up. By an over
               sight the draft agreement                                  (14) Acceptance over telephone or telex or fax
               remained in drawer.
                                                                                   Offer is made by instantaneous communication-
(10) Rules for Communication of Offer and Acceptance                                            Contract is completed
            For Valid Offer and Acceptance                                   When the Acceptance is             The Contract is made at the
            • Offer must be communicated to the Offeree                      received by the Offeror,          place where the Acceptance is
            • Acceptance must be communicated to the                                                                     received
                Offeror
                                                                          (15) When revocation of offer and acceptance is complete
(11)When communication of offer is complete?
                                    comes to the knowledge of                          as against the person          • when it is put into a
                                    the person to whom it is made                      who makes it-                    course of transmission
   Communication                                                                       as against the person          • when it comes to his
    of an offer is                  either by words spoken or                          to whom it is made-              knowledge.
     complete                       written, or it may be inferred
                                    from the conduct of the
                                    parties                               (16) When a Proposal and Acceptance can be revoked?
Relevant Case laws
                                                                                    Proposal                             Acceptance
Case laws        Facts                       Decision
                                                                               may be revoked at                    may be revoked at
Lilly            Plaintiff     delivered     Held, the terms were              any time before the                  any time before the
White Vs.        some      clothes     to    unreasonable      and             communication of its                 communication of the
Mannuswamy       drycleaner for which        Plaintiff was entitled            acceptance is complete               acceptance is complete
                 she received a laundry      to recover full value             as against the proposer              as against the acceptor
                                             of the saree from the
                 receipt      containing     drycleaner.
                 a condition that in
                 case of loss, customer      The     receipt    carries
                 would be entitled           special        conditions    (17)Modes of revocation of offer by
                 to claim 15% of the         and are to be treated
                 market price of value       as having been duly
                                             communicated to the                         Lapse of       Death or         Non
                 of the article, Plaintiff   customer and therein a        Notice of     specified      Insanity      fulfilment       Counter
                 lost her new saree.         tacit acceptance of these     Revoca-           or          of the            of           Offer
                                             conditions is implied           tion         reason-                     Conditions
                                             by     the     customer’s                                   parties
                                                                                         able time                     of Offer
                                             acceptance of the receipt
  has done or                                        promises to do       (4) Suit by a !ird Party on an Agreement (Doctrine of Privity
 abstained from            does or abstains          or abstain from
                            from doing, or                                of Contract)
    doing, or                                       doing something,
                                                                                                       General rule
        Such an Act or Abstinence or Promise is called                                    A stranger to a contract cannot sue
                Consideration for the Promise
(2) Law relating to Minor’s agreement/ Position of minor                 (5) Positions of agreements in case of persons of permanently
                                                                         unsound mind (in case of Idiots)
                               In case of supply of
     No rati$cation            necessaries claim to
      on attaining             be reimbursed from                        (6) Positions of agreements in case of Drunken/Intoxicated
       majority                 property of minor                        person
                                                                     6
                                                                                                                 BUSINESS LAWS
(7) Persons disqualified by law                                           (6) Effect of undue influence
                            contracts by such person are Void.              when agreement caused by undue influence-
                                                                            • contract is voidable at the option of the party
                             - Alien enemies                                  whose consent was obtained
            Statutes                                                        • contract may be set aside
           disqualify        - Foreign ambassadors
        certain persons      - Convicts
         to enter into       - Insolvents                                   Relevant Case Law
            contract
                             - Corporations                                 In Kirpa Ram vs. Sami-Ud-din Ad. Khan, a youth of 18 years of
                             - Etc.                                         age, spend thrift and a drunkard, borrowed Rs. 90,000 on a bond
                                                                            bearing compound interest at 2% per mensem (p.m.). It was held
                                                                            by the court that the transaction is unconscionable, the rate of
III. Free Consent                                                           interest charged being so exorbitant.
           Undue
          In%uence
                                              Misrepresentation
                                                                               Fraud can be
                                                                               committed by-     {    •
                                                                                                      •
                                                                                                      •
                                                                                                           a party to a contract, or
                                                                                                           with his connivance or
                                                                                                           by his agent
Consent is said
                                                                                                 {
    Coercion                  to be free                   Mistake                                    •    another party thereto or
                            when it is not                                     Act when done
                                                                                                      •    his agent, or
                              caused by                                        with intent
                                                                                                      •    to induce him to enter
                                                                               to deceive-
                                                                                                           into the contract
                                                                    8
                                                                                                                   BUSINESS LAWS
(19) Differences                                                          IV. Legality of Object and Consideration
Coercion and Undue influence                                              (1) When there is an unlawful object & unlawful consideration
                                                                          in an agreement, its effect
 Basis of difference   Coercion                   Undue Influence
 Nature of action It           involves     the   It involves moral or          Consideration or Object of an agreement is unlawful, if-
                         physical force or        mental pressure.         forbidden defeats         If it is      involves     immoral
                         threat.                                           by law       provision fraudulent or implies or
 Involvement of It                     involves   No such illegal act                   of any law                 injury to a opposed
 criminal action committing                  or   is committed or a                                                person or to public
                         threatening         to   threat is given.                                                 property     policy
                         commit any act                                                                            of another
                         forbidden           by                            "e           "e           "e            "e           "e
                         Indian Penal Code                                 Agreement agreement agreement agreement agreement
                         or detaining or                                   is Void.     is void.     is void.      is void      is void.
                         threatening to detain
                         property unlawfully.                             (2) Agreements against Public policy
 R e l a t i o n s h i p It is not necessary      Some       sort    of
 between parties that there must                  relationship between                                  Interfering with
                                                                               Trading with              the Course of                Brokerage
                         be      some      sort   the     parties    is
                                                                                  Enemy                      Justice                  Contracts
                         of        relationship   absolutely necessary.
                         between the parties.
 Exercised           by Coercion need not         Undue      in%uence                                                                 Restraint
 whom                    proceed from the         is always exercised            Sti%ing                   Creating                    of Legal
                         promisor nor need it     between parties to           Prosecution                 Monopoly                  Proceedings
                         be directed against      the contract.
                         the promisor. It
                                                                               Maintenance              Sale/Transfer of
                         can be used even                                                                                             Restraint of
                                                                                   and                   Public Offices
                         by a stranger to the                                  Champerty                   and Titles.                  Trade
                         contract.
 Enforceability          "e contract is           Where the consent
                         voidable at the          is induced by undue           Restraint                  Restrained
                                                                               of Personal                 of Parental                Restraint of
                         option of the party      in%uence,       the                                                                  Marriage
                                                                                 Liberty                     Rights
                         whose consent has        contract is either
                         been obtained by         voidable or the
                                                                          V. Agreements which are expressly declared void
                         the coercion.            court may set aside
                                                  or enforce it in a
                                                                          (1) Law declares following agreement to be either illegal or void
                                                  modi$ed form.
Fraud and misrepresentation                                                  Agreements by              Agreements in              Agreements, the
                                                                              Incompetent              Restraint of Legal          Meaning of which
 Basis of difference   Fraud                      Misrepresentation              Parties                  Proceeding                is not Certain
 Intention            To deceive the other        "ere is no such
                      party by hiding the         intention to deceive                                                                Reciprocal
                      truth.                      the other party.         Agreements made                Agreements
                                                                                                                                    Promises to do
                                                                            under a Mutual               in Restraint of
 Knowledge         of "e person making            "e person making                                                                   things Legal
                                                                            Mistake of Fact                  Trade                  and also Illegal
 truth                the      suggestion         the        statement
                      believes that the           believes it to be
                      statement is untrue.        true, although it is      Agreements, the               Agreements                 Agreements
                                                  not true.                 Consideration or
                                                                                                         made without               Contingent on
                                                                            Object of which
 Recission     of      "e injured party           "e injured party is         is Unlawful                Consideration             Impossible Events
 the     contract      can repudiate the          entitled to repudiate
 and claim for         contract and claim         the contract or sue
 damages               damages.                   for restitution but         Agreements                  Agreements
                                                                             in Restraint of             in Restraint of            Agreements by
                                                  cannot claim the                                                                   way of wager
                                                  damages.                       Trade                      Marriage
 Means           to "e party using                Party can always
 discover       the the fraudulent act            plead     that    the   (2) Consequences of agreement expressly declared void
 truth              cannot secure or              injured         party
                    protect     himself           had the means to
                                                                                              Agreements
                    by saying that the            discover the truth.                            expressly
                    injured party had                                                        declared void      Void- ab- initio
                    means to discover                                                        / illegal by the
                    the truth.                                                                Contract Act
                                                    A contract is said
                                                                                                                                 Legal
                                                    to be performed       Promisor himself          Promisor’s Agent
                     -Either perform, or
                                                                                                                             Representatives
       when the
        parties
        to the       -O"er to
       contract
                     perform their
                     promises
                                                                    10
                                                                                                             BUSINESS LAWS
(8) Is time an essence of Contract?                                   (12) Supervening impossibility
                                                                                                                                  makes
                                                                                         Fails to perform
                                                                                                                              it impossible
                                                                        refuses, or       his part of the     By his act
(11) Impossibility existing at the time of contract or Initial                                                               to perform his
                                                                                           contract, or
Impossibility                                                                                                                   obligation
Case                               Effects
If the impossibility is known to Such an agreement is void-ab-        (2) Effects of the Breach of Contract
the parties                      initio
If unknown to the parties      Such an agreement is void on
                               the ground of mutual mistake               !e aggrieved party is
 If known to the promisor only Such      promisor      must                                              gets a right to proceed
                                                                        relieved from performing
                                                                                                        against the party at fault
                               compensate for any loss                      his obligation, and
                               which such promisee sustains
                               through the non performance
                               of the promise.
                                                                              The Chartered Accountant Student January 2021            31
                                                                      11
BUSINESS LAWS
(3) Types of breach of contract
                                                                              Case laws      Facts                           Decision
                            Breach of contract                                Gibbons        A business man whose            In the case, it was held
                                                                              Vs. West       credit has su"ered will         that a non-trader cannot
                                                                              Minister       get exemplary damages           get heavy damages in
                                                                              Bank           even if he has sustained        the like circumstances,
     Anticipatory breach                          Actual breach                              no pecuniary loss.              unless the damages are
                                                                                                                             alleged and proved as
                                                                                                                             special damages.
       breach occuring
       before time fixed                      Refusal to perform
     for performance has                       promise on the
            arrived                            scheduled date                III. Special types of Contract
                                                                                          Contingent
(4) Liability for Damages                                                                                               Quasi-Contracts
                                                                                          Contracts
                                         Ordinary
                                         damages
                                                                                     Rules Relating to
                                                                                                                        Cases deemed as
              Pre-fixed                               Special
                                                                                     Enforcement of
                                                                                                                        Quasi -Contracts
              damages                                damages                       Contingent Contracts
                                                                                                       Contingent contract is
                                Nominal
                                damages
                                                                       12
                                                                                                       BUSINESS LAWS
(3) Rules regarding Contingent contracts
(a) Rule 1 regarding contingent contracts (e) Rule 5 regarding contingent contracts
      Where a contingent contract is made to do or not to do           • Such contract can be enforced by law if before the
         anything if an uncertain future event happens,                  expiry of fixed time-
                                                                         • Such event does not happen ,or
       • it cannot be enforced by law unless and until that              • It become certain that such event will not happen.
         event has happened.
       • If the event becomes impossible, such contracts
         become void.
                                                                 (f) Rule 6 regarding contingent contracts
                                                                 (1) Meaning
                                                                                                                           Quasi
                                                                                                                          Contract
(c) Rule 3 regarding contingent contracts
(d) Rule 4 regarding contingent contracts Obligation is a duty and not the promise of a party
        • Such an obligation/right to recover arises “where a                Trikamdas      T’ was traveling without !e suit was decreed in
          person lawfully does anything for another person,                  vs. Bombay     ticket in a tram car and his favour.
          or delivers anything to him not intending to do so                 Municipal      on checking he was asked
          gratuitously and such other person enjoys the benefit              Corporation    to pay R5/- as penalty to
          thereof,                                                                          compound transaction.
        • the latter is bound to make compensation to the                                   T filed a suit against the
          former in respect of, or to restore, the thing so done                            corporation for recovery
          or delivered.                                                                     on the ground that it was
                                                                                            extorted from him.
                                                                       14
BUSINESS LAWS
             CA FOUNDATION - PAPER 2A - BUSINESS LAWS
    In this capsule, we have summarized the important concepts of the Unit 1 and 2 of the Chapter 2: The Sale of Goods
    Act, 1930. From Examination point of view, this chapter comprises of around 12 to 14 marks of the paper. In this
    chapter, students are tested with conceptual understanding of the legal provisions, as well application of the important
    concepts in the simple practical scenarios. This capsule will help the students to revise and retain essentials of some
    of the important definitions and various requirements in the formation of the Contract of Sale.
                                                                     15
                                                                                                                       BUSINESS LAWS
         Future Goods                        Contingent Goods                 7. Property [Section 2(11)]
        [Section 2 (6)].                       [Section 6(2)]                                               Property means
 • Goods to be                          • The acquisition of which
    manufactured or                    • by the seller
    produced or                        • depends upon an uncertain                   ownership in goods/                   and not merely
    acquired                             contingency (uncertain event)                General Property                    a special property
 • by the seller after making           • Ex: P contracts to sell 500
   the contract of sale                   pieces of particular item           8. Price [Section 2(10)]
 • Ex: 1000 quintals of                   provided the ship which is
   potatoes to be grown in Mr.            bringing them reaches the
   A's field.                             port safely.                                      Money consideration for a sale of goods
                                   Delivery of
                                                          Fulfil other              an o#er to                                 by acceptance
                                 goods: Transfer                                                           for a price
          Subject matter:                                   essential                Buy/sell                                   of such o#er
                                  of property i.e
          Movable goods                                  elements of a
                                  ownership to
                                                         Valid contract
                                    take place
 Basis of difference               Sale               Hire- Purchase                      for the immediate delivery of the goods or immediate
                                                                                          payment of the price or Both
Time of passing Immediately                         On payment of last
property                                            instalment                                                      or
Position     of       the Buyer is like that of Position of the hirer
party                     owner                 is like that of bailee                        for the delivery or payment by instalments
                                                till final payment
                                                                                                                    or
Termination            of the buyer cannot The        hirer   may
contract                  terminate       the terminate        the
                                                                                            that the delivery or payment or both shall be
                          contract and bound contract by returning                          postponed.
                          to pay price        the goods
Burden of Risk of risk of seller                    Owner takes no risk
insolvency of the                                   and has right to take
buyer                                               back the goods           3. Mode for entering into contract of Sale
Transfer of title         The buyer can pass a Hirer cannot pass
                          good title to a bona any title even to a                                      A contract of
                          fide purchaser       bonafide purchaser                                        sale may be
                                                                                                          made in-
Resale                    The buyer can             Hirer cannot, unless
                                                    all installments paid
                                                                      17
                                                                                                                BUSINESS LAWS
2. Nature of contract of sale with respect to perishing goods
                                                                          Stipulation as to time of Payment and time
 Perishing Goods                                Future Goods              of delivery [Section 11]
     Where there is a contract for the                                     Stipulation as to the                    Stipulations as to time
                                                    If the future goods      time of payment                        of delivery are usually
     sale of specific goods,
                                                      are specific and                                                the essence of the
     • no knowledge to the seller                                                                                          contract
     • at the time when the
     • contract was made, goods                       the destruction            are not deemed to be of                    Delivery of goods
       perished or become so damaged                   of such goods           the essence from the terms                    must be made
     • Contract is void                                  amount to                of the contract of sale,                   without delay
                                                        supervening             unless terms of contract
     Where there is an agreement to sell               impossibility                 state otherwise.
     specific goods,
     • without any fault on the part of
       the seller or buyer
     • before the risk passes to the buyer
                                                        contract          Conditions and Warranties with reference
                                                      becomes void
     • and subsequently the goods                                         to the goods [Section 12]
       perishes or become so damaged                                      1. Meaning -Condition and Warranty
     • agreement can be avoided or
       becomes void.                                                                 Condition                               Warranty
                                                                           is a stipulation                      is a stipulation
                                                                           essential to the main purpose         co-lateral to the main purpose
Ascertainment of price [Section 9]                                         of the contract,                      of the contract,
                                                                           the breach of which gives rise        the breach of which gives rise
                      fixed by the contract, or
                                                                           to a right to treat the contract      to a claim for damages
                                                                           as repudiated.                        but not to a right to reject the
                                                                                                                 goods and treat the contract
    agreed to be fixed in a manner provided by the contract, or
                                                                                                                 as repudiated.
 Ex: P is having two bikes. He agrees to sell both of the bikes to                                                         may be either
                                                                                  ‘Conditions’ and                          express or
 S at a price to be fixed by the Q. He gives delivery of one bike                   ‘Warranties’
 immediately. Q refuses to fix the price. As such P ask S to return                                                          implied
 the bike already delivered while S claims for the delivery of the
 second bike too. In the given instance, buyer S shall pay reasonable
 price to P for the bike already taken. As regards the Second bike,
 the contract can be avoided.
                                                                       19
                                                                                                                  BUSINESS LAWS
9. Condition as to wholesomeness                                           10. Implied Warranties-Types
 Ex: A supplied F with milk. The milk contained typhoid germs. F’s                  Warranty as to non-              disclosure of dangerous
 wife consumed the milk and was infected and died. Held, there was               existence of encumbrances               nature of goods
 a breach of condition as to fitness and A was liable to pay damages.
              buyer shall have                        the goods shall                    An implied                          the goods are
               and enjoy quiet                          be free from                    warranty as to                       dangerous in
              possession of the                        any charge or                  quality or fitness                      nature and
                   goods.                              encumbrance                     for a particular
                                                                                        purpose may
                                                                                        be annexed or                         the buyer is
                                                                                       attached by the                      ignorant of the
             If the buyer having                                                                                                danger,
                                                      in favour of any                  usage of trade
              got possession of
                                                      third party not
              the goods, is later
                                                    declared or known
             on disturbed in his                                                                                            the seller must
                                                        to the buyer
                  possession,                                                            Ex: Shares                         warn the buyer
                                                                                      purchased from                        of the probable
                                                                                     broker expected to                         danger.
               he is entitled to                                                      be free from bad
                                                      before or at the
              sue the seller for                                                          deliveries
                                                     time the contract                                                    If there is a breach
              the breach of the
                                                       is entered into.                                                     of warranty, the
                  warranty.
                                                                                                                              seller may be
                                                                                                                          liable in damages.
              Ex: A Purchased
                                                     Ex: S sells a car
                a second hand                                                                                                  Ex : Lid of
                                                     which was given
              typewriter which                                                                                                disinfectant
                                                     as security by Y
               happened to be                                                                                                powder to be
                                                      against a loan
                    stolen                                                                                                 opened with care.
   Identification of goods               Intention of parties          Example: X purchased a laptop and asks for home delivery but
                                                                       that laptop does not have a Windows operating system installed.
                                                                       !e property transfers to X only after shopkeeper installed OS
                                      Property in goods is             making the laptop ready for delivery and intimated the buyer
   Goods must be ascertained
                                      transferred at the time-         about it.
      in order to pass the
                                      • when parties intend it to
   property in goods to buyer
                                        be transferred
                                                          Sale of unascertained or
                                                        future goods by description
  Delivery to the Carrier                                                   Example: X sends furniture to a company by a truck and instructs
                                                                            the driver not to deliver the furniture to the company until the
                                                                            payment is made by company to him. !e property passes only
     Seller delivers the goods                                              when the payment is made.
                                            for the purpose of
     to the buyer or carrier or
                                             transmission and
            other bailee
                                                                           Risk Prima Facie passes with Property
          the goods are                does not reserve the right                  Until the property therein is transferred to the buyer
          appropriated                        of disposal,
                                                                                           the goods remain at the seller’s risk
                             PASSING OF PROPERTY
                                                                                If delivery is delayed by the fault of the seller or the buyer
                   When he signifies his approval or acceptance
                 Retains goods without giving notice of rejection                  the goods remain at the risk of the party in default
                                                                                            (seller or buyer as per the case)
                         Does something to the goods which is
                               equivalent to acceptance
                                                                              !e duties and liabilities of the seller or the buyer as bailee of
                                                                                                 goods for other party
 Example: A sends to B a water motor on approval or return in                        will not be a"ected even when risk has passed.
 March, 2020. B to return it after trial in August, 2020. !e water
 motor has not been returned within a reasonable time, and
 therefore, A is not bound to accept it and B must pay the price.           Example: A bids for an antique painting at a sale by auction.
                                                                            After the bid, when the auctioneer struck his hammer to signify
                                                                            acceptance of the bid, he hit the antique which gets damaged. !e
4. Reservation of Right of Disposal                                         loss will have to be borne by the seller, because the ownership of
                                                                            goods has not yet passed from the seller to the buyer.
                                     the seller may by the terms of
                                     the contract or appropriation,
   Where there is a
 contract for the sale
  of specific goods
   or where goods                    reserve the right of disposal of
  are subsequently                             the goods
 appropriated to the
       contract
                                       until certain conditions are
                                                 fulfilled
                                                                      22
                                                                                                               BUSINESS LAWS
(II) Transfer of Title by Non Owners (Section 27-30)                    Types of Delivery
                                                                                                         Symbolic
                                                                                                          delivery
 Where goods are        who does not have
                                                   buyer does not                       Actual                        Constructive
 sold by a person        the authority or
                                                     acquire a                         Delivery                        Delivery
  who is not the        with the consent of
                                                     good title
   owner; and               the owner
                                                                                                         Types of
                                                                                                         delivery
 Example: P, the hirer of vehicle under a hire purchase agreement,      Duties of seller and Buyer
 sells them to Q. Q, though a bona fide purchaser, does not acquire
 the ownership in the vehicle. At the most he acquires the same
 right as that of the hirer.                                                 Duty of                           Duty of
                                                                               the                               the
                                                                              seller                            buyer to accept
                                                                                       to deliver the
                                                                                                                       and pay for
                                                                                       goods
NEMO DAT              Sale by a Mercantile Agent                                                                       them
QUOD NON
HABET – No one        Sale by one of the joint owners
can give what he
has not got.          Sale by a person in possession under voidable     Rules regarding Delivery of Goods
                      contract
Exceptions:
                      Sale by a person who has already sold goods                                                              Delivery to
                                                                                Part                    Instalment
                      but continues in possession thereof                                                                       carrier/
                                                                              delivery                   deliveries
                                                                                                                               wharfinger
                      E"ect of Estoppel
                              Rights of an                            Example: A sold a car to B for R1,00,000 and delivered the same
                             unpaid Seller                            to the railways for the purpose of transmission to the buyer. !e
                                                                      railway receipt was taken in the name of B and sent to B. Now A
                                                                      cannot exercise the right of lien.
             Against Goods                      Against the Buyer
                                                                24
                                                                                                                   BUSINESS LAWS
(iv)
                                                When does the transit come to an end?
         When the buyer Buyer obtains        Where the carrier           If the carrier   Where goods Where the part          Where the
          or other bailee delivery before     or other bailee             wrongfully      are delivered delivery of the       goods are
         obtains delivery. the arrival     acknowledges to the             refuses to     to the carrier goods has been delivered to a
                            of goods at buyer or his agent that           deliver the      hired by the     made to the     ship chartered
                           destination    he holds the goods as          goods to the         buyer      buyer, the transit by the buyer,
                                          soon as the goods are              buyer.                         will come to      the transit
                                            loaded on the ship,                                            an end for the    comes to an
                                           unless the seller has                                         remaining goods         end.
                                           reserved the right of                                           which are yet
                                          disposal of the goods.                                          in the course of
                                                                                                           transmission.
(vi)
                                                                               Fails to deliver the goods at the time or in manner prescribed
Exceptions            When the seller has assented to the sale,
where unpaid          mortgage or other disposition of the goods made
seller’s right        by the buyer
of lien and                                                                   Breach of contract by seller, where he-
stoppage in           When a document of title to goods has been
transit are           transferred to the buyer and the buyer transfers
defeated              the documents to a person who has bought goods
                      in good faith and for value                              Repudiates the contract
3. Right of re-sale
                                                                                                                         Damages for
                                                                                                                         non-delivery
                                                   Where an unpaid
                            Where he gives           seller who has
    Where the
                          notice to the buyer      exercised his right                                               Suit for specific
   goods are of a
                          of his intention to      of lien or stoppage                                                performance
 perishable nature
                           re-sell the goods        in transit resells
                                                        the goods
                                                                                            Rights of                   Suit for breach
                                                                                             buyer                       of warranty
              A re-sale by the
               seller where a            Where the
              right of re-sale        property in goods                                                              Repudiation of
                is expressly          has not passed to                                                              contract before
               reserved in a              the buyer                                                                     due date
              contract of sale
                                                                                                                           Suit for
                                                                                                                           interest
                                                                   26
BUSINESS LAWS
                            CA FouNdAtIoN - PAPer 2A - BuSINeSS LAwS
  This capsule on Paper 2A: Business Laws at Foundation level covers the concepts of Unit 1 of the Indian Partnership
  Act, 1932 which is Chapter 3 of this paper. It covers significant concepts explained in a graspable manner for rational
  understanding of legal provisions. This will help the student to understand and retain the important aspects of the legal
  provisions. This capsule in fact, is in short notes which aids to revise the subject in the examination condition and can be
  referred a day before examination. This is relevant for the November 2022 examination.
individually 'Partners’
                    Persons who
                 have entered into                                                                                'a firm'
                                                                   collectively
                partnership with one
                 another are called
2. Elements of Partnership
                                                            27
                                                                                                                BUSINESS LAWS
3. True Test of Partnership                                                  Basis of             Partnership           Joint Stock Company
                                                                            difference
                                                                           Registration      For a partnership, firm    Company is created
                                                                                             registration is not com-   by registration under
                                                  agreement                                  pulsory.                   Companies Act, 2013.
                                                 between all               Winding up        A partnership may be A Company is wind up
                                                 the persons                                 dissolved by any part- by NCLT or its name is
                                                  concerned                                  ner at any time if all the struck o" by the ROC.
                                                                                             partners agree.
                                                                           Number of         Number of partners: Private      company:
        Existence of                                                       membership        maximum-100        (As minimum- 2, maxi-
     partnership, when                                                                       per Section 464 of the mum- 200
                                                                                             Companies Act, 2013)
                                                                                             Present limit is 50 Public Company: min-
                                                                                             [As per Companies imum- 7, maximum-
                                              share the profits                              (Miscellaneous) Rules, No limit
                                                of business                                  2014]
                                                                                                                    One person compa-
                                                                                                                    ny: 1
                                                                           Duration of       Firm does not have Company has perpetual
                   business was                                            existence         perpetual succession. succession.
                 carried on by all
                  or any of them                                          II. Partnership Vs Club
5. Kinds of Partnership
Partnership
                                                                                                          Particular              General
               Partnership at will                          Partnership for a fixed period
                                                                                                         Partnership             Partnership
                                                                                                        organised for
  no fixed period             no provision             partnership
                                                                             comes to an end            any particular         constituted with
  has been agreed            made as to the            created for a
                                                                             on the expiry of            adventure or           respect to the
   upon for the             determination of         particular period
                                                                             the fixed period          undertaking the        business in general
   duration; and            the partnership.              of time
                                                                                                         partnership
6. Types of Partners
Types of Partners
                                                                   29
                                                                                       BUSINESS LAWS
Active or
               Sleeping or
Actual or                        Nominal        Partner in        Incoming          Outgoing         Partner by
                Dormant
Ostensible                       Partner        profits only       partner           partner         holding out
                 Partner
 partner
                                                                                                    When a person
                                 Lend his                                                            represent
                                                                  admitted as
                                name to the                                         A partner        himself, or
                                                Entitled to        a partner
                                   firm                                            who leaves
                                                 share the           into an
                                                                                     a firm in
 become a                                       profits only         already
               a partner by                                                         which the
partner by                                                          existing                         Knowingly
               agreement,         Without                                           rest of the
agreement,                                                         firm with                          permits
                   and           having any                                          partners
   and                                                            the consent                         himself,
                                real interest                                        continue
                                                                    of all the
                                   in firm                                         to carry on
                                                                    existing
                                                                                     business.           to be
                                                                   partners.
                                                                                                    represented as
                                Not entitled     Not liable                                          a partner in a
                                to share the      for the                                           firm (when in
                                   profits         losses                                           fact he is not)
                                                                                      remains         he is liable,
  actively       does not      Does not take                      Not liable          liable to     like a partner
participates   actively take     part in the                        for any        third parties      in the firm
   in the       part in the    conduct of the                     act of the         for all acts
 conduct         conduct          business       Liable to        firm done         of the firm
                                                                                                      to anyone
   of the         of the                         the third        before his        until public
                                                                                                      who on the
partnership    partnership                      parties for      admission as         notice is
                                  Liable to                                                          faith of such
                 business                        all acts of      a partner.        given of his
                                third parties                                                       representation
                                                the profits                         retirement.
                                 for all acts                                                          has given
                                                    only                                             credit to the
                                 of the firm
                                                                                                         firm.
          LLP itself will be liable for the full extent of its assets
                                                                                            formed,
                                                                          Foreign
       Liability of the partners will be limited                           LLP                               Outside
                                                                                           incorporated
                                                                          means                 or            India
                                                                           LLP                                               which establishes
                                                                                                                             a place of business
2. Important De!nitions                                                                    registered                           within India.
(i) Body Corporate [Section 2(d)]
                            • a LLP registered under this                (v) Limited Liability Partnership [Section 2(n)]:
 It means a company           Act;
  as de!ned in clause
(20) of section 2 of the    • a LLP incorporated outside
    Companies Act,            India; and
  2013 and includes         • a company incorporated                                      LLP means
                              outside India
                                                                                                  a partnership formed and registered
                                                                                                  under LLP Act, 2008.
                            • a corporation sole;
                            • a co-operative society
                              registered under any law for the
                              time being in force; and                   (vi) LLP Agreement [Section 2(o)]:
                            • any other body corporate (not
     but does not             being a company as de!ned in
       include                                                                          between the partners            which determines the
                              clause (20) of section 2 of the                              of the LLP; or              mutual rights and duties
                              Companies Act, 2013 or a LLP                                                               of the partners and
                              as de!ned in this Act), which                 Any
                              the Central Government may,                 written
                              by noti!cation in the Official             agreement
                              Gazette, specify in this behalf.
                                                                                          between the LLP               their rights and duties
                                                                                          and its partners              in relation to that LLP
(ii) Business [Section 2(e)]
                                                                    31
                                                                                                                  buSiNeSS lawS
(viii) Small Limited Liability Partnership [Section 2(ta)]             5. Minimum number of partners (Section 6)
                                                                       (i)
            the contribution of which, does not exceed
          `25 Lacs or such higher amount, not exceeding
                `5 Crore, as may be prescribed; and                      Every LLP                                    shall have at least two
                                                                                                                             partners
                             Small LLP
                              means
                                                                       (ii)
                                       the turnover of which, as per                                                         the person,
     which meets such                    the Statement of Accounts                                     and the LLP         who is the only
    other requirements                      and Solvency for the                                        carries on      partner of the LLP
                                                                               If at any time                              during the time
   as may be prescribed,                immediately preceding F/Y,            the number of            business for
   and ful!ls such terms                  does not exceed `40 Lacs                                     more than 6            shall be liable
                                                                               partners of a                                  personally for
     and conditions as                  or such higher amount, not            LLP is reduced          months while
    may be prescribed.                 exceeding `50 Crore, as may                                    the number is         the obligations
                                                                                   below 2                              of the LLP incurred
                                              be prescribed; or                                        so reduced,
                                                                                                                             during that
                                                                                                                               period.
                                                                       7. Characteristic of LLP
      Any Individual; or                       Body Corporate
                                                                                                Minimum
         he is an undischarged                                          Management                 and        Business for
         insolvent; or                                                                          Maximum                        Investigation
                                                                        of Business             number of     Pro!t Only
                                                                                                 Partners
         he has applied to be
         adjudicated as an insolvent
         and his application is
         pending                                                        Compromise              Conversion     E-Filing of        Foreign
                                                                             or
                                                                        Arrangement              into LLP      Documents           LLPs
  easy to form
                                                                                  %e certi!cate issued shall be signed by the Registrar
                                                                                  and authenticated by his official seal.
                                                                      33
                                                                                                                               buSiNeSS lawS
5. Name (Section 15)                                                              2. Cessation of partnership interest (Section 24)
                                                                                  (i)
                                                                                                            A person shall
                                                                                                            cease to be a
                                                                                                            partner of a LLP—
6. Reservation of name (Section 16)
                                                                                   if he has
 A person may apply in                                                             applied to be                                           if he is declared
 such form and manner and                                                          adjudged as                                             to      be     of
 accompanied by such fee              • name of a proposed LLP; or                                                                         unsound mind
                                                                                   an insolvent
 as may be prescribed to the          • name to which a LLP proposes               or declared as                                          by a competent
 Registrar for the reservation          to change its name.                        an insolvent.                                           court; or
 of a name set out in the
 application as—
(iii)
                                                                                   (ii)
 where a person becomes                     where there is any change in the
 or ceases to be a partner,                  name or address of a partner,                                                                             such
                                                                                           Every LLP                         in such
                                                                                             shall-                           form                  statement
                                                                                                                                                    be signed
                                                                           35
                                                                                                                      buSiNeSS lawS
(iii)