0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views24 pages

Appeal Booklet

The document is a notice from the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding a hearing for an appeal filed by Deep Chand Agarwal concerning a customs order from 1986. The hearing is scheduled for 24th February 2012, and the appellant is advised to appear in person or through an authorized representative. The document also outlines the consequences of failing to appear and the need to rectify certain defects in the appeal before the hearing date.

Uploaded by

tribunalhydcus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views24 pages

Appeal Booklet

The document is a notice from the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding a hearing for an appeal filed by Deep Chand Agarwal concerning a customs order from 1986. The hearing is scheduled for 24th February 2012, and the appellant is advised to appear in person or through an authorized representative. The document also outlines the consequences of failing to appear and the need to rectify certain defects in the appeal before the hearing date.

Uploaded by

tribunalhydcus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

E{ or b2oo?

o3 tN

.-i
4

GUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


R iste red AD 4
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH
Shastri Bhavan Annexe 1't Floor, No 26 Haddows Road, Chennai-600006
Telephone : ax: 044-28234293

6b of M istake/
Notice of hearing of Stay/Condonati
Miscellaneous apPlications.
!! sil
1

G/ROA/37/12
kNlz
Application No
Appeal No c/60/87 b4-,,
4r
of
olo 17184 (Gold) irc i\ir. 8.1 'l .86
Arising out i
Passed by the cc &cE
Representative
Appellant il.,
rf
Sh Deep Chand Agalwal
S/O Shyam Murari Agarwal M/s Deep Alankar Jewellers
Basnahi Bazar, Chand Shekhar Azad Marg
vs
Mirzapur, UP
dent Representative
Res
CC & CE HYd bad \ \z- L)
With ROA N
A-
g"-i -D*
Co.tn '

the Apptication mentioned above is fixed for hearing


on ?4f2012
1. Take notice that
before
Der the causeligt and as mav be convinient !9 lhe fribunal
at 10.30 AM or aly 9g!99qggd date there afteraq and time of hearing either in person
CESTAT, SZB, Chennai. ln ,i":"ppuffit"ii.i" ,nn"".r. -., tt"aUove date
on merits' ln
""""
,"pr"."n,"irilin"-appeat may oe oismissed for default or heard and decided
or through an authorised
oate ano time, the appeal may be decided exparte'
case the respondent tairs to appear aiine aoove

2'lncaseyoudonotwishtoappeareitherinpersonorthroughauthorisezedrepresentative.Youmayintimate
your absence'
ihat the matter may be decided on merits in

appeal/applications pending in the Tribunal


and ripe for the hearing' where the issue
3. lf you have any other
same; you-may if you so desire, inform the registry
of rribunal at least
involved is identical (and tt e part,""-!i" t'"' practicable' also
tne adotfionat appeals/applications will, for as
two weeks prior to the aat" ot neair['. rn ih" "";i
be listed for hearing at the same time

Registrar
Date : 5-Sep-2012

Copy to:-
JCDR Chennai With ROA
1

2 Advocate/ Consultant

Sh AP Mathur, Adv
167 Tagore Town
Allahabad-21 1 0002

N ote:-
the date of hearing for future correspondance
1 Please quote this Office Appeal Number and
above malter is listed on the date mentioned'
2 Please visit the website and confirm that the

3 Thefol|owingdefectsarenotedintheappealandtheappellantisdirectedtorectifythembeforethedateof
hearing
,*
29
i!

IN THE HONtsLE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI
************* *!x'r,
--#=:=^:
;rfi _
,"'-''*"- ' J-'

( "'&i'
IN
/eXa",A;* ui:.'l'i .
iln zorz
(oN BEHALF OF DEEP CHAND AGARYTAL)','
IN
APPEAL NO.G 6OI87-MAS
(Arising out of Order in No. l7lSa(cold) dated
18.1 1.1986 passed by the Collector of Customs and
Central Excise, Hyderabad)

Deep Chand Agarwal ...........,.Appellant


Versus
The Collector of Custonrs and Central Excise,
Hyderabad (A.P.) .... Respondent

sl. Date Annexure Pages


No. No.
1 Bank Draft of Rs.
5OO/- in favour of
Assistant Registrar,
CESTAT, Chennai.
2. Recall Application
t*3
3. True qopy of
Tribunal's order
30.06.1987 1
q-v
4 True copy of the Year 1987 2

lication
[- lL
5 True copy ofthe Year 1995 3
l3- )1
6. AJfrdavit 2o'zz
/W H"./-
Dated: /J .8.2ot2. (A.P.MATHUR)
Advocate
Counsel for the Appellant
I 67,T agor e Town,Allahabad

-al
IN THE HONtsLE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI
***r(*********
P"s o'rr'*l
oF 2(J12
(ON BEHALF OF DEEP CHAND A

IN q [o"t
APPEAL NO.G 6OI87-MAS
(Arising out of Order in No. 17 dated
18.1 1.1986 passed by the Collector of Customs and
- Central Excise, Hyderabad) i..
,.i;f,=i
- i' '!
.? ..-*..

Deep Chand Agarwal Son of Shri Shyam


Murari Agarwal, C/o Deep Alankar Jewellers',-..\.,..
Rasnahi Bazar, Chandra Sheklear Azad Marg,

.............Appellant
Versus
The Collector of Customs and Central Excise,
Hyderabad (A.P.)
Respondent

The humble Application of the above named


Applicant/Appellant, Most Showeth as

Under:

1. That the above quoted Appeal No. G 60/87-MAS


filed by the Applicant/Appellant was dismissed vide order

No.429/1987 dated 30.06.L987 tn terms of Section 82-

A of tJ:e Gold (Control)Act 1968,

I1
A true copy of the order dated 30.06.1987 is
annexed to this Application marked as Annexure No. 1.

2, That the Applicant/Appellant had already filed a


Restoration in 1987 itself immediately after

the dismissal of the Stay Application but the said

Application has not been listed for hearing till date and

the was also dismissed for non-compliance of the

stay order _ without taking into account the Restoration

Application Iiled by the Applicant/Appellant.

A true copy of the Restoration Application filed in


1987 is annexed to this Application marked as Annexure

3. That the Applicant/Appellant in 1995 filed another

Application for restoring the Appeal to its original

number praying to allow the Applicant/Appellant to

the amount adjudged by the Honble Tribunal in

its exparte stay order but as ill luck would have it even

the said application has not been listed so for:

A true copy of the said Application is a:irnexed to


this Application marked as Annexure No. 3.

ta
q
4. That it is also important to mention here that no
orders has been received by the t /Appellant till
date in respect of the Appeal filed under the Customs

Act, t962.

5 That since the gold seized in the ihstant case was


absolutely confiscated holding that the same belonged to

the Applicant/Appellant by the Collector of Customs &


Central Excise, Hyderabad; without grring any option to

redeem the same hence it will be in the interest ofjustice


to recall the order No. 429/ 1987 dated 30.06.1987 and
pass such and further order'as tl:is Honble Court may

deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this

Honble Court may be graciously please to recall the


order No. 4291L987 dated 30.06.1987 and pass such

other and further orders as this Honble Court may deem

fit q4d proper under the facts and circumstances of the


case

Dated: 13 .O8.2Ot2.
Mp^-{)
(A.P.MATHURI ,.^ tS!{.a^t z.alootQf
Advocate
Counsel for the Appellant
1 67, T agore Town, Allahabad

,c
-a"

\
IN THE HONtsLE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPET*r.f,yP.u.y.1l, CHENNAT

I
IN

oF 2012
(ON BEHALF OF DEEP CHAND AGARWAL)

IN

APPEAL NO.c 60/87-MAS


(Arising out of Order in No. 17l8a(Gold)dated
18.11.1986 passed by the Collector of Customs and
Central Excise, Hyderabad)

Deep Chand Agarwal

. Versus
The Collector of Customs and Central Excise,
Hyderabad (A.P.) ........,.... Respondent

rt ..1 -\'

1
r-

) \
rN riiE,_,cxrgT0pts,,
'.%8+f,u#H?.ffit%Jf8ilrffi .il4$"Jo*TETRTBUNAL
G. AppEAL No.5t
/aT,_U.aS
4.;:
a:
,t-l
3i:Ts::r;ii-;i:?"!:T#"1#"r"ri;:r:or?"rsJ**
Date of decj.sion:
Deep C[6a6 Agarval 30__6__198T
... Appellant
(Represented by
vers us none)
q3i#;i"fi,:f"
sr*;H"10"0 . Re spond ent
(Represented by ShrI K.M.
Vadivelu, D.R.)
-qw.g.-
8fiff fl :,1'ffiil1H;^XflI^l?T,ffiBff
**,*
0 RDE RN
fu4 rghri s. IGlvangm (ora,)
The appe&J.ait
absent and has bought an
1s,,
adJournment.
r:., that the rrlbunal by order dated
I::::: :T.records
in Order No.169/gT,dlrected the 8.6.a2
appellant to deposi*
or before 30-6-19g7 and report " "*.*'",
f.rotogf-_"n compliance. There
is no inforuatlon r, egardlng the
compliance of the said order of
.the Tribunal . In t.he circu,stances,
the appeal is dlsmi.ssed
r-n terms of Sectlon g2_A
of the Go16(gontrol) Act, 1968.
sa/-
( IGTA RAMANI)
sd/-
rtE R (s. K/TLYANAM)
MEMBER
rRUE COPY / IY CROEtr.
,t

- d.m*,L-----.
ae
aa
ffi*r AS
3U5 llJI5.
EEGI-7R
.lUIIr .ti.i, iat, e hiR 0t
Ir?
it- Itt tLlrn fftlnr\ trDnrr
rI $ ?i t....

x .-l
6

IN THE HONtsLE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
*rr***********
ANNEKTIRE NO. 2

IN

RTCALL APPLICATION NO. oF 2012


(ON BEHALF OF DEEP CHAND AGARWAL)

IN

APPEAL NO,c 60/87_MAS


(Arising out of Order iri Original No. 17l84(Gold) dated
18.l 1. 1986 passed by the Collector of Customs and
Central Excise, Hyderabad)

Deep Chand Agarwal .............Appellant


Versus
The Collector of Customr and Central Excise,
Hyderabad (A.P.) Respondent

x at
# .--}t
.rlr rr'6 (}$i'{r& IXClsf |. qgLr, ( c9}reiil.l
t t?Il*l
tbtriurr{, [E.rtH ruc[staL Stltct{ I ,Irlnl
alllltrrar.

REmlNg0t rPrllctlt€:t tro, o, tttt


6 boldt ct
-crp ihlfl-, Aq.3url Vo $ul $rrr nirrrt r;rfl.
r'/D ;:rap rlrrhr rlrrllrcl
, tip+r* itrtr
q.riu. rr $Crlrr
ilt( lilrcr [[r'lurr.
',-?r--_ fggU t!.
I&
&*rry igyf.f, ;iliL li(rr .qll,,rr{,/ |igt/tilr,gf

u
rppg1. 1p. f/tlllsl,
IIJImIITTHL
;erp ghlR': Agffv;; r, ., r _ _ fp::tll:L
. vtslrt
i:.;llrctcr of Orr,tctr t Cmt,tat
trr[st
rlJ':tBfebaor t, r ,
- - - _ ri r r r R1pr6rt1al,

'1h. rhFrhlr
ll'lldfit sd l{n *r$r
l'!.imherr ol thr lhrlBt qrrtr

Ihr ll)fr lmflarrsg$ el !r.c ffr$ttr|rb


o i:(+l$rr , thvtorrrd r trrt hft*Artly At|tb . I

l. shrt rh, .Dw qnrd ,t y rPpurl3r *t


Itrrrc frr hr.4ts $ 3{r{rtttt b:b!E
ttr hf
er$srt elrl' -,', $r:
..,- lf*F
litg&,,, l&it,... t' "'+f,

:oniddt
,(
I -r.
'i/
tr
: 2, irrar ,rt *t thr fppllct*rr_3p*lft
rJre qoue
,-i,

nus lrln$ dclr lrocr g qla}ra tdc,:nn rla t t

on lilth irl.rtl fr8? Drfyj,sg l4lputffi,eric. r S, rl


tno ti']$gr0!r rnc . phtortfB copy of sal*?t ,rir.,

lrrrr-e,t by gh3 Jq;]ru,rrt ot :rlrrcrilrfo*b,


tf
c,.ri rxrd tor pOW aftr

il, thrt lt lr , ttrIrlor| *B th. in'OI* Ot


Jur;tlcs to rlrtort tho 1t11 epllc+tlo,r Nor q/ftq,
]e3./fillrHA$ ln App1ltr ilqr
E/t?lllrs Elle_t bf DrC
-itd.r. rxrrnrlf Vo Cry; il$ra* ag}rrsrl F a_af,
,lml.lr Jrr*lrrrr lllrlrl lrir, gtnrdrr
thffaa,
t'
,'&lld , ilrfE, lfrl.x|rt

.+ttllf ,:
rr [rr thral&a] fbrt ln.cGGrlfy;lty,
tliat g51t rroorblr eQsst ilfy br g|ndougtl ltlia{
,) Eeeror| tbr .try tppuc.tls to. vlt vrrulrrra
tr. ,'..;.1i1 :to. trljll,bE alaC ;ry _r+ qtd atHE,
r/o shyof,'ltun4 rgrnnl Vg lxr AlrlrtorJlilknr
,td0..bl lr|'f. ehm{Sr ltr*hrr l!|l [rrEb lltfira

( iug, gtt*rr, I
^quiltL
ipt"'Uritt-ep:r*ltL
i;rtrC Jt|r. rltl?r

x
v

lrr r.rri g.t&xr l)clfi r cED I comrru &Frru{;ll


;EI4trrJrL t t$rlfi lE5et{|l. Brrlcrl nri,lll
.
rtltararrrf

ifTr t|rEr
If
: lu;&.Ofl^lleu ffllgrItel.No. O, lrr?
Itl
:ir I Af PLlCirflet fie, lt/ttlv/ tll/e7/a, G

(
-uelrll(l vlrls 9gg;3 N(,t l0./lgu7 d!. ,,Golll?
).
ttl
tr'rtl& BO

-rcp Jhlrd Agr&rt ,' - ' !. , _ r


' .\;,p tl lOf tr
vtt$r
ccllccror ot qtrtilt I C(nts* l:a,.r
|.'; dr r rbrd

rt4{rvlg gt rgti.l
D1p Ctrd o

lg|(l rh{t l8 y.asf, ty'o tl


ttrnd Agr6*il c/o q llrlrr
Jlv*lrr;r tl3r,,r rl1lrr Gblr
th*hrr {tnct lhrgr lrtr*lia.
('pncn"og 1

I, thl oTeneB fbvo*t& { |l.gtb, r*af7


.fftrn m, ttlti oI crrh ll lcllourr

1. rht thl l*ennt tr thr |Peucilrr?rltafrl


ln thr rbvJlottf *ao sC r, fltt hr tr rtt
Ilj:-.- _
-- :,t .i-irli*_\_.,

..*
r
' s,. I
.--
:)

6c:$rrolsii dtb th.


Tgt' Oforfa O

2o Uret tbo rbcv. {,otrd ftay .pi}lt$r$il f,r


lJ.rtr', fqr hrtrtng cr'l{rfilgl?
)rtorr th. rrtt
F{,,qJl,xrll Bsrehr

$r fhrt tL ccm{rl ot th,


tppltoentiqp.Uf$
l{ar I ylng |"} hmea * lrtil.c tllaJr,gsr sr ral
on lsrb *prrt pq1 pn,lng
|4Jc*r[at rer.t
^
rirc tola*"., ]rd I platorttt copy o! tl.ru lloart
lrauqd W tfu drDrlurart ct ltlrecn*rnrc.rlsa lf
arln cx.rd lor prnr tlt.

{. lt lk tntrtorr, lB thr tnt65o3g q3


Tirat

iusii:r to rlarD tlr rHr


lpfllcruon ..o. all&x|VUV
llir-.i fn Ai+$l tae. s,llly'ttaf
,tlra by rrow gbo
,.
'.rr'rl l/s luil* rcrfirl Vo ,Erp Alrlar
flIryt;
.I ovrt I rrj
Srpctd s.r.r. chlndrr shd(h
lli r z*iU tr

jr tlil d?osrnt 0bovfiliL


rr{.r rld atilr
i1. t..1q oot{5lt, o! psrogirtph lr |r&lrr .t
tlrle at4clavlt trt
tF|e to rY lt'no rl
tlr,r t.tiq cplltrtrrlr os pit}idcph
Fe& & 3prrBrr
of ctrlc rtft,t*\rlt fir hrmt oa prrufit ot rrc!3

i,
! t\
C]

that the Ort6gn of


F,,ngr.rpi. (1r'. { o! 3
rr i ll ;. vl t
ll brrrd on,lnirt rdrrl c., vtl'
clr rtl t
.r,,,Il cvc to i)e true, tlli}t
fio p+rt uf lt la tfis
.4,. . trqt..t0g n.. t!5lt.l ht lo3r @ncrrl ftj.
l(, h$lp Er qod,

..tlIli.
( ,rqqrrr t )
e r sh.r{t prlltd, gr rr* to $61 i qr,. lrr tll ar
"i'vQ {:.s re. rrl gh cou rtr rtlahrbo . do h Jxel.,!, dacgaSa
th,r titl ptrlln ffBng
Urt r rf fl :iarl ! sig
Incdi rr be g;i deorc.E rltrsrg
ir r,ho Jor? F.rrtpn
uhl
t p ho,r :r to no tmil thf ::T.ortl ; ro.fu,:6,1
ln thlr

, -t-"i .ii-l- - -
rr$ rnrd bsgore m+ i;ii tlc n
,l'rlctly
:+:. o f uu$tr l9g?, r! lrri/p.ro. ;ry th.
.i9,o ori[ w]u lur brn I dsrrl flGd by
t:hr r{orrrdd
' tr i'rh,

I Iltvl sl r,.1sg 6,j o.


IreJ f b: t:i*r,lr:i ,$ to
fii, O' l c.::j .
ihlt ha un,!o6f t.ll iifi
ihr c5trr. r.' r.u of tl[r
':r: l''.trrvl 1 r rrtfg6 hrve
btfr rr.ldovcr $r:r, erglltl.d
'r Sr i:I $tr

t)At'H ggg,ri11;ilA;it

/t

-:_-.--.
. 1l il/a'i rtii..ali.r. r.rrar..,. r, i. ,..

DlTaituatfY
nott
(ir lntt n-ril
[E
aG G
Strrr
Ch.mr
rtrtfrq r!!lt rnin f"fnf MU
tl.'|t
t"h.. t.
wrnt| ltrrr ttrrr Brfk0i
,. nvI) tt vnll rr'
Iltr rR rr ww t'f
rll3r
li t ttr m if, )
lolthl.
m
tny
,0
clax :)
Tlm.
i-./ ti/a f._tJ. Lc,
c ortgto
s. l. ufi
We.o.
i' .\ t s /-A \IT R It;
ol 'f n /,7.!. Er/ A oL'rti
it r ,i'A U'E ii! t",r [^r ( ll
Yrt t ,7 tt tt A i/ t] tH /tRl lloA 1,! 1. .s r.:, , ;". ,.
A l',.,
.i,ll ll .D 47! 'r'i-- l-. c t RLLA r.. fr1.7J1,r,y,
l4 ADP i] ,! - l,'ot, $t7
.,?fFfR / /-- T rf,A /l/l,,tA
/tt /
ppr,,i
a! lu or L i/a $ls Pty I l,D / 'ij bn r€b
r_ /tD
/1tP z i,i pi,,! 1,ig'7 cf io , ?'7
ll/tTrtrl tiE/i d rt b t-Eit (h'AN*b
A SAA fu42
-'-*. * . .l'; 'i ( 0/, J' rn/ .r4 lfti.4 T/o.,t/
/-7 Z ll iit-\ i-/t/.A AA:rct Lt R AI. AS
louy tfl
r t.J1.. l.l. t../I J-l t/i. l,t 1U.!.?*
T/: l-t o Ltnt /U
X7t [t aE 7a
u tr kt€-lt ON
ktNtt v 11
.

i! l: ;--\ <-
o t"l J' /? ?/ra r-
/3a616
ENlu ltr
.i'€^,t r .IIPPArpz,

rri t ef I!(/senerr,r
llgnat0.t
Diz'p (HlNl
.

. llVt.n,.
ritl
b't;":,i;i,n/ rrR Ir E1
P, Az/1
D
i kl tR za py ryot ,o b.

s. (. Prin!r,L

) '1.

a
\Z

rN rHE HoNtsLE cullgy!,EXcrsE & sERVrcE rAx


AnnELLATE CE ersrver
I*H_r.y*1,
ANNEXuRE NO.3

IN
REcA,ll,_tllucATroN
(oN BEHALF OF.DEEP
No. oF 2ot2
CHAND AGARWAL)

IN

APPEAL NO.c 6OI87_MAS


(Arising out of order
griginJ'u-", ji)i+tcold) dated
18.1 1.1e86 passed in
uv urJCo["";;;i il_,"ms
and
Central Excise, UyaeraUaat -
Deep Chand Agarwal
Appellant

The collector of custom":t;";",.at Excise,

'14
r
I
4a 2
tl

rt sotlrrillF[f ,c t!|nttl rrI}I

fsar, lt[I$fin t tt f al

{or l;trlt r, ijl qp

IDEI, *t t
rn
rr!r.-- {tl${l}

a o
,:a-traa_--
5

I lr HBr rhlk i|. r, rh r,ttfr


rbv31q4, trt tttq)frU, tr*h
l. or.! rI .Dlfrrvrmtlr tra,llt
rr
Ul$lry rlrrtti I 1117 ;1 ril;r
n
3

tr*hno.wdtlt r*
tr, lt1l(
rrilrr
Or{rF IOr rUt a.rra
lf.lSltl Hl E tI

I r tll fif m rllr* r?*lc*lF


$rrr
b,
al*ty,Aavnry rr ldilrt
r, rh hrli urr

t ' .). hir


_*,-."" jji::,rd,)

fl
\ --:',
'il
rr

\5
{r

vlib ltt r!a.8 irr rt^r,


llrt !f rltttr t
tber ![r lrrhrr
ilrcrr tl| .D.lrar b |lrrlt
r' loleoq/- $Frrl rtn H, ll rry ot r*t'
rqrbr rr*|f, !l rl rh
tlilsatorl r.l St.
cs o! lrlelt |9{*lt?r

3a !h* thr rt*b.rlrD.rur


fia tlt
{rxtlr shr |rL *It ; Fr ir rrlih;*f
trtttr r

e r . ,,nt* ur rr*ttvrttrrt
ll Hb
(!rprtt, rhr .da
rhr nrrrrt rPFSi
-;r ? Elthr$r ra fit
d ,* qil{r * h.
lce rd Ytr'lr.try
*r,,B rr urr rat L
a0 .sr lttEl.*? tt; tt uttl tr t
t
rntrnrt rt Jrr}lr tr
rflf rhr refhtQatlltrt
tc rhnrtt h 19.67, llil ;r a?d., }rr ft
{e og/?Ira r trrttr }r ?rm':ut rl.
r
.a I
Irr .slltrrl lrl*r

,NBL
rt lrr,r.fiilfirr trt trrilfiflr
th.t ttS. hl!:Sr tir} lr[ fr
Hla
wdrlll fiH li#
iir

i
.t.
ir
\ L

tlr ufrcVrtrrlrrt tc {6615


Dmilt, of ;. ltrq/- u.

o
.c/?,/'[, rt [Ir, CIrl
rl
lurllto

t
I

'Ill rr trtq r;f, 1ql {1tA


I

* t l.ttlrr qr .l r5fl.} tr urr .t


I
rrn il tsr r.s1r ta r",rrr ltrrrr
i .I ,tUa1q1 t *I llt,l
( rrna g

.rftItt ldltf
firlor
DtS* tlll d.e ry|ltulttu Ht
r
et t- qru ur.r $
urtr ilr
tilrilt ,nrD d.t ,. $rrrrrrr
'lQilllal - - -. lliltltrr.6l3rr 1111rs
f l1'|lD to lcp111*
ttlr
'l!l!*f..--.--... thrfr ttlfo d..o
.E

tt/l.h) 'qr trrer


rt
I lprlrr fafo aA ,r ,ttrq ro
,
JrAa&,).or ttr I frtil6gp r66q
t
aaala..aa
rrilr - .lritlrr
fffilqlilfh- raa
:r." ffi,r$l .,r ur ffirrttlri* *r. u

t\ ?
(
,'*
l

II

rr t* {hrtt ;5vrsl o
rlclr il{ s$r rt* tt,
t;rtrGr
aorl tt t
t
lrl rlrif il
rrt tlq tr ry mm*
Hr*rr rBtL
t* m Drt ot rt 1.,*tT
0t rilbl{ rtlrtq

e.,re.tia-lO

Iht rI
1 Bn
:l
r'

rlr**t rt* rh im
rrHrt txr *fi;;l rr
rrlrl$r Ulrt, rr h
i'l
Brrrrl rb k rrm
h ll lr: t
la lHr rrrr.

r,}--r!'a-ill,

( clrrf I

/t* tl
0
ll-ea

\
1

,h hr fn ilrtrry,
rb
I)

t
t rt* r, lrhrrtlt tb
5l
citr6
tr'

x
"I

2P

IN THE HONtsLE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI
. *************
AFFIDAVIT

IN

RECALLAPPLICATION NO. oF 2012


(ON BEHALF OF DEEP CHAND AGARWAL)

IN

APPEAL NO.c 60/S7_MAS


(Arising out of Order in Original No. 17l8a(Gold) dated
18. f 1.1986 passed by the Collector of Customs and
Central Excise, Hyderabad)

Deep Chand Agarwal Son of Shri Shyam


Murari Agarwal; C/o Deep Alankar Jewellers,
Basnahi Bazal., Chandra Shekhar Azad,Marg,
Mirzapur.
Appellant
Versus
The Collector of Customs and Central Excise,
Hyderabad (A.P.)
Respondent

Affidavit of Deep Chand

Agarwal aged about 37 years,

S/o Sri Shyam Murari Agarwal

C/o Deep Alankar Jewellers,

Basnahi Bazar, Chandra


Shekhar Azad Marg, Mirzapur.

(Deponent)

a
\

I, the deponent above named do hereby solemnly

a{firm and state on oath as under:

1. That the deponent is sole appellant in tl:e above

noted case and as such he is fully acquainted with the

facts of the case deposed to below.

I, the deponent above named, do hereby swear and


aflirm that the contents of paragraph no.l of this
Affidavit and those of paragraph nos. 2,J,,
of the accompanying Application are true to m5r personal

knowledge , those ofparagraph nos. I


of tJ..e accompanying Application are based on perusa,t of

record; that the contents of paragraph nos.

of the accompanying Application are based on


information received; and tJlat the contents of paragraph

nos. f of t].e accompanying Application

are based on legal advice; which all I believe to be true;


i .

that no part of it is false; and nothing material has been


concealed.

So help me God.
r
(Deponent)

, \t'11-
-r(
\ Y)'/

I, Sharda Prasad Yadav, Clerk to Sri A.p. Mathur,

Advocate, High Court, Allahabad, do hereby declare that

the person making this allidavit and alleging himself to

be the deponent is the s€rme person who is known to me

from the papers produced in this case.

(Advocate)

Solemnly affirmed before me on this ;3 th day of


August, 2012, at
l.1o NOf 1p.M. by the d.eponent who
has been identified by the aforesaid Advocate.

D
I have satisfied myself by examining tl:e deponent
that he understands the contents of this affrdavit which
have been read over and explained to him by me.

OATH COMMISSIONER

You might also like