Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from [_______ to _______]

Commission file number 001-35492

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Hawaii 45-4849780
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
822 Bishop Street
Post Office Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawaii 96801
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
808-525-6611
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, without par value ALEX New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at February 14, 2020:
72,306,508
Aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2019:
$1,668,784,587
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III of Form 10-K)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Page

Items 1 & 2. Business and Properties by Business Segments 1

A. Commercial Real Estate 4

B. Land Operations
(1) Landholdings 8
(2) Active Development-for-sale Projects 8
(3) Renewable Energy 9

C. Materials & Construction 9

Employees and Labor Relations 9

Available Information 10

Item 1A. Risk Factors 10

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 26

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 26

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 26

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities 27

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 29

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations 31

Items 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 44

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 45

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Page
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial 93
Disclosure

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 93

A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures 93

B. Internal Control over Financial Reporting 93

C. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 93

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 96

A. Directors 96

B. Executive Officers 96

C. Corporate Governance 97

D. Code of Ethics 97

Item 11. Executive Compensation 97

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters 97

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 97

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 97

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 98

A. Financial Statements 98

B. Financial Statement Schedules 99

C. Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K 102

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary 107

Signatures 108

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

FORM 10-K

Annual Report for the Fiscal Year

Ended December 31, 2019

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Business and Strategy

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B" or the "Company") is a fully integrated real estate investment trust ("REIT") whose history in Hawai‘i
dates back to 1870. Over time, the Company has evolved from a 571-acre sugar plantation on Maui to become what management believes is one of
Hawai‘i's premier real estate companies and the owner of the largest grocery-anchored, neighborhood shopping center portfolio in the state. After a
long period as a holding company of operationally and geographically diverse business interests and assets, the Company established a strategic
intent to become a Hawai‘i-focused commercial real estate company, through which the Company would be able to create value for both
shareholders and the community using its extensive local market knowledge and real estate expertise. To execute this strategy, the Company has
endeavored to expand and strengthen its Hawai‘i commercial real estate platform and simplify its business, primarily through monetizing non-core
assets. The Company has made significant progress in executing its strategy, including, most recently, completing the migration of its mainland
commercial real estate portfolio to Hawai‘i ("Migration"), completing the sale of approximately 41,000 acres of non-income-producing agricultural
lands on Maui and redeploying proceeds from that sale into six commercial real estate assets on a tax-deferred basis.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company's commercial real estate portfolio consists of 22 retail centers, ten industrial assets and four office
properties, representing a total of 3.9 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"), as well as ground leases comprising 153.8 acres in
Hawai‘i. In total (inclusive of its commercial real estate portfolio), the Company owns over 29,000 acres of land in Hawai‘i, primarily conservation-
and agriculture-zoned, but also urban-zoned land.

The Company operates three segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction. A description of each of
the Company's reporting segments is as follows:

• Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in
investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development
(i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house
leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-
day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its
portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and
industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored
neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience
and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing
venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing
real estate assets.

• Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following
activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse
legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally
derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business
activities.

• Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural
materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.

Of the Company's total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2019, 73.5% are within the CRE segment, 13.6% are within Land
Operations and 11.7% are within Materials & Construction, with the remainder unallocated and used for corporate purposes. Additional information
about the Company's business segments is provided in "Management's Discussion and Analysis

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements," which are included in Item 8 of Part II of
this Form 10-K.

The Company's strategy is principally focused on:

• Increasing recurring income streams by leveraging several sources of Commercial Real Estate portfolio growth including:

◦ Effective leasing and property management,

◦ Repositioning and redevelopment of existing assets,

◦ Ground-up development of new assets,

◦ Acquisitions of new assets using tax-deferred exchange funds from land/property sales and/or

◦ Acquisitions of new assets using the Company's balance sheet.

• Executing on its simplification strategy which includes:

◦ Monetizing development-for-sale pipeline and related investments,

◦ Monetizing the Company's other landholdings and

◦ Exploring the potential monetization of non-core operating businesses in both the Land Operations and Materials &
Construction segments.

• Continuing to practice disciplined and prudent financial management and capital allocation to maintain balance sheet strength and
financial flexibility.

Key strategic activities and initiatives by segment are discussed below.

Commercial Real Estate Strategy

The Company's commercial real estate strategy focuses on Hawai‘i, where it benefits from its broad experience base, deep relationships
and strong reputation in the islands. These attributes, and a geographic focus in Hawai‘i, uniquely position the Company to create value through the
acquisition, development, redevelopment and management of commercial real estate in the state. The Company believes the Hawai‘i market is
positioned for stability and growth, given the state’s positive economic performance and comparatively favorable macroeconomic indicators (e.g.,
median household incomes, personal income growth rates, low unemployment rates, etc.) and lack of commercially-entitled lands (i.e.,
comparatively low square footage of strip retail gross leasable area per capita on Oahu). Based on these factors, the Hawai‘i retail market compares
favorably with other top-tier retail markets in the U.S. Similarly, given the severe shortage of industrial land supply in Hawai‘i, industrial market
rents and per square foot values exceed those achieved in other U.S. markets, making Hawai‘i a high-performing industrial market, despite its
geographic isolation. In addition to strong resident demographics and market fundamentals, the Hawai‘i commercial real estate market is supported
by a growing and resilient tourism industry, as well as consistently high levels of government spending due to Hawai‘i's strategic defense location
between the continental U.S. and Asia. Therefore, as a result of the Migration in 2018, not only have the Company's assets been concentrated where
management is best able to enhance portfolio performance, but the overall asset quality of the Company's portfolio has significantly improved.

To further enhance asset quality and increase the recurring income stream from its commercial portfolio, the Company intends to:

• Increase income and optimize returns on its commercial portfolio by:

◦ Being the landlord of choice by providing desirable locations, quality properties, landlord services and community amenities,
◦ Leveraging internal property management and leasing to efficiently manage operations and maximize cash returns,
◦ Executing effective marketing and leasing strategies that attract quality tenants in the marketplace and new tenants to
Hawai‘i by leveraging its position as the largest owner of grocery/drug anchored shopping centers in Hawai‘i,

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

◦ Investing in the repositioning and redevelopment of existing assets at an appropriate risk-adjusted return on capital,
◦ Developing new commercial properties at an appropriate risk adjusted return on capital and
◦ Selectively acquiring commercial real estate assets in Hawai‘i markets at returns that exceed the Company’s risk-adjusted
cost of capital.
• Evaluate other commercial property investment opportunities, such as leased fee assets or other commercial real estate types, when
the acquisitions are strategically consistent with the value creation objectives of the Company.

Land Operations Strategy    

The Company strives to maximize value from its historical landholdings as it seeks to transition to a commercial real estate-focused
company. For its landholdings designated for current or future urban development and use, the Company explores development of commercial real
estate assets for its own portfolio (in response to market demand while meeting community needs) or seeks monetization of such land and related
investments (including current for-sale projects) earlier in their development cycle.

The Company also owns land that is not designated for development (e.g., agricultural lands, conservation/watershed lands). Consistent
with its simplification strategy, the Company is pursuing monetization of these assets through transactions eligible for tax-efficient reinvestment.
When timely monetization, in line with its simplification strategy, is not feasible, the Company continues to employ these landholdings at their
highest and best use through legacy business activities.

Materials & Construction Strategy    

Activities in the Materials & Construction segment are primarily conducted through the Company's consolidated subsidiary, Grace Pacific,
a diversified and vertically integrated construction materials and hot mix asphalt paving contractor with operations throughout the Hawaiian Islands.
Grace Pacific also, through consolidated subsidiaries, offers a variety of related for-sale and for-rent services, including road safety and
transportation construction services, and serves as Hawai‘i's only precast/prestressed concrete building materials manufacturer. Grace Pacific also
holds a 50% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate, Maui Paving, LLC ("Maui Paving"), which operates primarily on the island of Maui.

Consistent with its simplification strategy to focus on the growth and expansion of its commercial real estate portfolio in Hawai‘i, the
Company continues to actively explore options involving the sale of some or all of the Grace Pacific businesses. No timeline has been established
for the completion of these options.

Additional activity in the M&C segment includes its share of the results of operations of an unconsolidated investment, Pohaku Pa‘a LLC
("Pohaku"). Pohaku is composed of two wholly-owned subsidiaries, HC&D, LLC (formerly known as Ameron Hawaii, LLC) and Island Ready-
Mix Concrete, Inc. Pohaku, through these wholly-owned subsidiaries, operates rock quarries on the islands of Oahu and Maui and sells a wide range
of products that include ready-mix concrete, rock and sand aggregates and cultured stone and related products.

Financial Strategy

The Company values a strong balance sheet with levels of debt and repayment schedules that would enable it to protect its ownership of
assets through market cycles and to provide capital for opportunities to invest at attractive risk-adjusted returns. Following the increase in debt
necessitated by the 2018 REIT special distribution, the Company continues to pursue debt reduction through non-core asset monetization and cash
flow from operating activities. A decline in Materials and Construction earnings has impeded this progress, but monetization efforts in 2019
facilitated progress in debt reduction.

To achieve this desired balance sheet posture, the Company intends to:
• Maintain a disciplined capital allocation strategy with a focus on investments that have attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to the
Company’s cost of capital;

• Continue to improve leverage metrics through earnings growth and debt reduction;

• Ensure well-laddered debt maturities and minimize near-term maturing debt;

• Maintain a high proportion of fixed-rate debt and a longer weighted-average maturity; and

• Maintain a large unencumbered portfolio of assets.

Throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, references to "we," "our," "us" and "our Company" refer to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.,
together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS

A.    Commercial Real Estate

The following table presents a summary of GLA square footage ("SF") by improved property type as of December 31, 2019:

Current GLA
(SF)
Retail 2,497,500
Industrial 1,216,800
Office 143,600
Total 3,857,900

(1)    Commercial Properties

A&B’s improved commercial real estate portfolio consists of retail, industrial and office properties, comprising approximately 3.9 million
square feet of GLA as of December 31, 2019. Most of the commercial properties are located on Oahu and Maui, with smaller holdings on Kauai and
Hawai‘i (island). The occupancy for the portfolio (i.e., the percentage of square footage leased and commenced to gross leasable space at the end of
the period reported, "Occupancy") was 93.9% and 92.4% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For properties in the portfolio, annualized
base rent ("ABR") is calculated by multiplying the current month's contractual base rent by twelve.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

As of December 31, 2019, the Company's commercial real estate improved property assets were as follows ($ in thousands, except per
square foot, "PSF," amounts):

Year Built/ Current ABR

Property Island Renovated GLA (SF) Occupancy ABR PSF
Retail:
1 Pearl Highlands Center (1) Oahu 1992-1994 411,400 99.8 % $ 11,236 $ 27.38
2 Kailua Retail (1)(3) Oahu 1947-2014 319,100 96.5 % 11,251 36.81
3 Laulani Village Oahu 2012 175,800 99.3 % 6,415 37.09
4 Waianae Mall (1) Oahu 1975 170,300 87.0 % 3,068 20.72
5 Manoa Marketplace (1) Oahu 1977 140,900 85.2 % 3,922 33.14
6 Queens' MarketPlace Hawai‘i Island 2007 134,700 90.1 % 5,426 53.71
7 Kaneohe Bay Shopping Center (1) Oahu 1971 125,400 100.0 % 3,125 24.92
(Leasehold)
8 Pu‘unene Shopping Center Maui 2017 120,500 64.6 % 3,284 46.35
9 Hokulei Village Kauai 2015 119,200 98.2 % 4,093 35.23
10 Waipio Shopping Center (1) Oahu 1986, 2004 113,800 100.0 % 3,303 29.02
11 Aikahi Park Shopping Center (1) Oahu 1971 98,000 82.1 % 1,951 24.49
12 Lanihau Marketplace (1) Hawai‘i Island 1987 88,300 94.6 % 1,747 20.90
13 The Shops at Kukui‘ula (1) Kauai 2009 86,100 93.0 % 4,121 54.70
14 Kunia Shopping Center (1) Oahu 2004 60,600 95.0 % 2,345 40.74
15 Waipouli Town Center Kauai 1980 56,600 93.9 % 948 17.84
16 Lau Hala Shops (3) Oahu 2018 46,300 100.0 % 2,652 57.32
17 Napili Plaza (1) Maui 1991 45,600 87.6 % 1,221 30.56
18 Kahului Shopping Center (1) Maui 1951 45,300 93.6 % 672 15.83
19 Gateway at Mililani Mauka (1) Oahu 2008, 2013 34,900 93.2 % 1,825 56.19
20 Port Allen Marina Center (1) Kauai 2002 23,600 92.0 % 591 27.27
21 The Collection Oahu 2017 12,000 100.0 % 559 46.64
22 Ho‘okele Shopping Center (2) Maui 2019 69,100 N/A — —
Subtotal – Retail 2,497,500 93.3% $ 73,755 $ 33.12

Industrial:
23 Komohana Industrial Park (1) Oahu 1990 238,300 87.0 % $ 2,669 $ 12.87
24 Kaka‘ako Commerce Center (1) Oahu 1969 201,100 93.3 % 2,544 14.40
25 Waipio Industrial (1) Oahu 1988-1989 158,400 98.8 % 2,514 16.07
26 Opule Industrial Oahu 2005-2006, 151,500 100.0 % 2,320 15.31
2018
27 P&L Warehouse (1) Maui 1970 104,100 100.0 % 1,492 14.53
28 Kapolei Enterprise Center Oahu 2019 93,000 100.0 % 1,507 16.19
29 Honokohau Industrial (1) Hawai‘i Island 2004-2006, 86,500 100.0 % 1,197 13.84
2008
30 Kailua Industrial/Other (1) Oahu 1951-1974 69,000 93.4 % 1,116 17.85
31 Port Allen (1) Kauai 1983, 1993 63,800 100.0 % 739 11.58
32 Harbor Industrial (1) Maui 1930 51,100 87.2 % 538 12.08
Subtotal – Industrial 1,216,800 95.3% $ 16,636 $ 14.53

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Year Built/ Current ABR

Property Island Renovated GLA (SF) Occupancy ABR PSF
Office:
33 Kahului Office Building (1) Maui 1974 59,400 87.4% $ 1,496 $ 30.44
34 Gateway at Mililani Mauka South (1) Oahu 1992, 2006 37,100 100.0 % 1,641 44.18
35 Kahului Office Center (1) Maui 1991 33,400 87.7% 765 26.09
36 Lono Center (1) Maui 1973 13,700 88.9% 305 25.10
Subtotal – Office 143,600 90.9% $ 4,207 $ 32.93
Total – Hawai‘i Improved Portfolio 3,857,900 93.9% $ 94,598 $ 27.03

(1) Included in the same-store ("Same-Store") pool, which management uses in the calculation of certain non-GAAP metrics at an improved
property or ground lease level. Refer to page 38 for a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures and the required reconciliation of non-
GAAP measures to GAAP measures.
(2) Development completed but not yet stabilized. Upon initial stabilization the property will be included in occupancy. Refer to page 39 for a
discussion of management's determination of stabilization.
(3) In prior periods, Lau Hala Shops was combined into Kailua Retail. However, beginning in the year ended December 31, 2019, information
for Lau Hala is presented separately and has been excluded from Kailua Retail.

The Company also has a portfolio of commercial ground leases at December 31, 2019, as follows ($ in thousands):

Location
Property Name (1) (City, Island) Acres Property Type Exp. Year Current ABR
1 Windward City Shopping Center Kaneohe, Oahu 15.4 Retail 2035 $ 2,800
2 Owner/Operator Kapolei, Oahu 36.4 Industrial 2025 2,271
3 Owner/Operator Honolulu, Oahu 9.0 Retail 2045 1,886
4 Kaimuki Shopping Center Honolulu, Oahu 2.8 Retail 2040 1,344
5 S&F Industrial Pu‘unene, Maui 52.0 Heavy Industrial 2059 1,275
6 Owner/Operator Kaneohe, Oahu 3.7 Retail 2048 990
7 Windward Town and Country Plaza I Kailua, Oahu 3.4 Retail 2062 753
8 Windward Town and Country Plaza II Kailua, Oahu 2.2 Retail 2062 485
9 Owner/Operator Kailua, Oahu 1.9 Retail 2034 450
10 Owner/Operator Honolulu, Oahu 0.5 Retail 2028 348
11 Owner/Operator Honolulu, Oahu 0.5 Parking 2023 319
12 Pali Palms Plaza Kailua, Oahu 3.3 Office 2037 257
13 Seven-Eleven Kailua Center Kailua, Oahu 0.9 Retail 2033 243
14 Owner/Operator Kahului, Maui 0.8 Retail 2026 242
15 Owner/Operator Kailua, Oahu 1.2 Retail 2022 237
16 Owner/Operator Kahului, Maui 0.4 Retail 2020 214
17 Owner/Operator Kahului, Maui 0.8 Industrial 2020 200
18 Owner/Operator Kahului, Maui 0.5 Retail 2029 173
19 Owner/Operator Kahului, Maui 0.4 Retail 2027 158
20 Owner/Operator Kailua, Oahu 0.4 Retail 2022 151
Remainder Various 17.3 Various Various 1,336
Total - Ground Leases 153.8 $ 16,132

(1) Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from our Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of
operations.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

(2)    Tenant Concentrations

The Company’s top ten tenants at December 31, 2019 (ranked by ABR) were as follows ($ in thousands):

% of Total % of Total
Improved Improved
Number of Portfolio Portfolio
Tenant1 Leases ABR ABR GLA (SF) GLA
Albertsons Companies (including Safeway) 7 $ 6,853 7.2% 286,024 7.4%
Sam's Club 1 3,308 3.5% 180,908 4.7%
CVS Corporation (including Longs Drugs) 6 2,752 2.9% 150,411 3.9%
Foodland Supermarket & related companies 10 2,608 2.8% 146,901 3.8%
Ross Dress for Less 2 1,992 2.1% 65,484 1.7%
Coleman World Group 2 1,780 1.9% 115,495 3.0%
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics, & Fragrance, Inc. 3 1,508 1.6% 33,985 0.9%
24 Hour Fitness USA 1 1,375 1.5% 45,870 1.2%
Petco Animal Supplies Stores 3 1,316 1.3% 34,282 0.9%
Whole Foods Market 1 1,210 1.3% 31,647 0.8%
Total 36 $ 24,702 26.1% 1,091,007 28.3%

1 Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from the Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operation.

(3)    Lease Expirations

The Company’s schedule of lease expirations for its total improved portfolio is as follows ($ in thousands):

% of Total % of Total
Square Improved Improved
Number Footage of Portfolio ABR Portfolio
Expiration Year of Leases Expiring Leases Leased GLA Expiring Expiring ABR
2020 147 469,191 13.2% $ 10,434 10.0%
2021 161 600,189 16.9% 15,040 14.4%
2022 169 399,427 11.2% 13,000 12.5%
2023 114 266,212 7.5% 9,046 8.7%
2024 78 436,011 12.3% 12,462 11.9%
2025 30 153,365 4.3% 4,864 4.7%
2026 21 179,077 5.0% 4,663 4.5%
2027 24 155,882 4.4% 4,679 4.5%
2028 37 237,143 6.7% 9,737 9.3%
Thereafter 52 541,899 15.2% 17,452 16.7%
Month-to-month 96 117,934 3.3% 2,935 2.8%
Total 929 3,556,330 100% $ 104,312 100%

B.    Land Operations

The Company's Land Operations segment seeks to strategically monetize the Company's legacy, non-commercial real estate landholdings
and assets.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

(1)    Landholdings

At December 31, 2019, A&B owned 27,925 acres related to its Land Operations segment as follows:

Type Kauai Maui Oahu Total Acres

Land used in other operations 20 21 — 41
Urban land, not in active development/use
Urban Developable, with full or partial infrastructure 6 110 — 116
Urban Developable, with limited or no infrastructure 29 186 — 215
Urban Other 6 23 — 29
Subtotal - Urban land, not in active development 41 319 — 360
Agriculture-related
Agriculture/Other 6,358 6,264 75 12,697
Urban entitlement process 260 357 — 617
Conservation & preservation 13,309 392 509 14,210
Subtotal - Agriculture-related 19,927 7,013 584 27,524
Total Land Operations Landholdings 19,988 7,353 584 27,925

(2)    Active Development-for-sale Projects

The Company's Land Operations segment has current development-for-sale projects encompassing resort residential and light industrial
lots for sale in Hawai‘i. This list has been reduced significantly in recent years thanks to successful monetization efforts and the decision not to
initiate new development-for-sale projects. The following is a summary of the Company’s active real estate development-for-sale portfolio as of
December 31, 2019:

(in millions)
Est.
Planned Total
Est. Units or Units/ Project/ A&B Gross
Product Economic Saleable Acres Investment Investment
Project Location Type Interest Acres Closed Cost (Life to Date)
Wholly Owned:
Maui Business Park Kahului, Light 100% 125 44 acres $ 91.0 $ 59.0
(Phase II) Maui industrial acres
lots
Joint Ventures:
Kukui‘ula Poipu, Resort 85% +/- 5% 1,425 units 221 units $ 1,071.0 $ 323.0
Kauai residential
Other Kukui‘ula Poipu, Resort 75% +/- 5% 58 units 39 units $ 102.0 $ 52.0
Related Investments Kauai residential

Maui Business Park: Maui Business Park II (“MBP II”) represents the second phase of the Company's Maui Business Park project in
Kahului, Maui. MBP II is zoned for light industrial, retail and office use. At December 31, 2019, approximately 81 acres remain available.

Kukui‘ula and Other Kukui‘ula Related Investments: In April 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with DMB Communities II
(“DMBC”), an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. ("DMB"), an Arizona-based developer of master-planned communities, for the development of
Kukui‘ula on acreage that consisted of historical A&B landholdings. As of December 31, 2019, total capital contributed to the main project was
approximately $323.0 million, which included $30.0 million representing the value of land initially contributed by the Company.

Other Kukui‘ula Related Investments includes joint venture investments in two vertical construction, development-for-sale projects at
Kukui‘ula, as well as notes receivable from a Kukui‘ula development-for-sale project.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

(3)    Renewable Energy

The Company is directly involved in the renewable energy field and has been a clean energy producer for over 114 years. It has renewable
hydroelectric and solar power facilities on Kauai, operated by its wholly-owned subsidiary, McBryde Resources, Inc. (“McBryde”), and has
invested over $37 million in solar projects on Kauai and Oahu.

McBryde produced 26,572 MWH of hydroelectric power (compared to 25,753 MWH in 2018) and 11,122 MWH of solar power
(compared to 11,203 MWH in 2018). To the extent it is not used in A&B-related operations, McBryde sells electricity to Kauai Island Utility
Cooperative (“KIUC”). Power sales in 2019 amounted to 30,756 MWH (compared to 31,800 MWH in 2018).

In 2019, an estimated 23% of the energy used by Kauai residents was produced through renewable energy facilities that either (1) the
Company operates or invests in or (2) are located on landholdings owned by the Company that are leased by third-party energy operators. Through
its own projects, investments and land leases, the Company played an important part in Kauai's recent achievement of its goal of more than 50%
renewable energy generation (as announced in January 2019). Moreover, according to KIUC in a news release, in recent months in 2019, KIUC
successfully supplied all of the grid's electric needs with 100% renewables for extended periods lasting several hours. The Company intends to
continue contributing additionality to help achieve Hawai‘i's renewable energy generation goals.

C.    Materials & Construction

(1)    Quarries and Quarry Facilities

Grace owns 542 acres in Makakilo, Oahu, approximately 200 acres of which are used for its quarrying operations. Approximately 787,000
tons of rock were delivered by Grace in 2019. The operation of the quarry is governed by special and conditional use permits, which allow Grace to
extract aggregate through 2032. Grace also owns approximately 264 acres on Molokai, which are licensed to a third-party operator for quarrying
operations.

(2)     Equipment

Grace owns approximately 700 pieces of on- and off-highway rolling stock, which consist of heavy-duty trucks, passenger vehicles and
various road paving, quarrying and operations equipment. Additionally, Grace owns approximately 200 pieces of non-rolling stock items used in its
operations, such as generators, transit tankers, light towers, message boards and nuclear gauges. The Materials & Construction segment has six rock
crushing plants and seven asphaltic concrete plants (three on Oahu, one on Maui, one on Kauai, one on Hawai‘i (island), and one on Molokai).

Employees and Labor Relations

As of December 31, 2019, the Company and its subsidiaries had 793 regular full-time employees, as compared to 875 regular full-time
employees as of the prior year end. At the end of 2019, the Company's Materials & Construction segment employed 595 regular full-time
employees. Approximately 53% of the Company's employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with unions.

There are 18 bargaining unit employees at Kahului Trucking & Storage, Inc. ("KT&S") that are covered by a collective bargaining
agreement with the International Longshore and Warehouse Union ("ILWU") that expires on March 31, 2021. There are two collective bargaining
agreements with 18 A&B Fleet Services employees on Hawai‘i (island) and Kauai, represented by the ILWU. Both the Kauai and Hawai‘i (island)
agreements expire on August 31, 2020.

A collective bargaining agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO, Local Union 3 (“IUOE”) covers 168 of
Grace’s employees, who are primarily classified as heavy-duty equipment operators, paving construction site workers, quarry workers, truck drivers
and mechanics. The agreement expires on September 2, 2024.

Collective bargaining agreements with Laborers International Union of North America Local 368 (“Laborers”) cover 205 Grace
employees. The traffic and rentals Laborers’ agreement expires on August 31, 2021; the precast/prestress concrete Laborers’ agreement expires on
August 31, 2024; and the Laborers' agreement with fence, guardrail and sign installation workers expires on September 30, 2024.

A collective bargaining agreement with the Hawai‘i Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of
America, and its Affiliated Local Unions and General Contractors Labor Association and the Building Industry Labor Association of Hawai‘i
(“Carpenters”) cover 11 Grace employees. The Carpenters agreement expires on August 31, 2024.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Available Information

The Company files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The reports and other information filed include
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other reports and information filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding
A&B and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

The Company makes available, free of charge, on or through its Internet website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The Company’s website address is
www.alexanderbaldwin.com.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business and common stock are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the risks and
uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Form 10-K and the Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. The risks and uncertainties faced by our Company are not limited to those described below, nor are they listed in order of
significance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not
possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any
factor, or combination of factors, may affect our business. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently believe
to be immaterial, may also materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. This Form
10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

If any of the following events occur, our business, liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially
adversely affected, and the trading price of our common stock could materially decline.

Risks Related to REIT Status

Qualification as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions to our operations and finances, as well
as various factual determinations concerning matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. There are only limited judicial and
administrative interpretations of these provisions. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. In addition, our
ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends, in part, on the actions of third parties, over which we have no control or only
limited influence.

If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial
tax liability, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We have determined that we operated in compliance with the REIT requirements commencing with the taxable year ended December 31,
2017. Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various requirements concerning, among other
things, the sources of our income, the nature of our assets, the diversity of our share ownership and the amounts we distribute to our shareholders.
Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not
susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Although we intend to operate in a manner
consistent with the REIT requirements, we cannot be certain that we will remain so qualified.

If, in any taxable year, we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on our taxable income at
regular corporate rates, and we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income. Any resulting
corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders, which, in turn, could
have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. In addition, unless we are entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would
be disqualified from re-electing REIT status for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.

10

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Our significant use of taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) may cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT.

The net income of our TRSs is not required to be transferred to us, and such TRS income that is not transferred to us is generally not
subject to our REIT distribution requirements. However, if the accumulation of cash or reinvestment of significant earnings in our TRSs causes the
fair market value of our securities in those entities, taken together with other non-qualifying assets, to represent more than 25% of the fair market
value of our total assets, or causes the fair market value of our TRS securities alone to exceed 20% of the fair market value of our total assets, in
each case as determined for REIT asset testing purposes, we would, absent timely responsive action, fail to qualify as a REIT.

Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to sell assets or forgo otherwise attractive investment opportunities.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continually satisfy various requirements concerning, among other things, the nature of
our assets, the sources of our income and the amounts we distribute to our shareholders. For example, we must ensure that, at the end of each
calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of some combination of “real estate assets” (as defined in the Code), cash, cash
items and U.S. government securities. The remainder of our investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities
issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value
of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government
securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the
value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRS. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar
quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid
losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to sell assets or forgo otherwise attractive
investment opportunities. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income, amounts available for distribution to our shareholders and
amounts available for making payments on our indebtedness.

We may be required to borrow funds, sell assets or raise equity to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements, which could adversely affect our
ability to execute our business plan and grow.

We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid
deduction and excluding any net capital gains, to maintain our qualification as a REIT. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement
and qualify as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains, we will be subject to tax at
ordinary corporate tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we
distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws. We intend to make
distributions to our shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% annual excise tax.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition
of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or
amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell
assets at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, to make distributions sufficient to
enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise
tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity or adversely impact our ability to raise short- and long- term
debt. Furthermore, the REIT distribution requirements may increase the financing we need to fund capital expenditures and further growth and
expansion initiatives. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our
common stock.

Whether we issue equity, at what price and the amount and other terms of any such issuances will depend on many factors, including
alternative sources of capital, our then-existing leverage, our need for additional capital, market conditions and other factors beyond our control. If
we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities or debt convertible into equity securities, the percentage of stock owned by our
existing shareholders may be reduced. In addition, new equity securities or convertible debt securities could have rights, preferences and privileges
senior to those of our current shareholders, which could substantially decrease the value of our securities owned by them. Depending on the share
price we are able to obtain, we may have to sell a significant number of shares to raise the capital we deem necessary to execute our long-term
strategy, and our shareholders may experience dilution in the value of their shares as a result.

Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. shareholders that are
individuals, trusts and estates is currently 20%, exclusive of the 3.8% investment tax surcharge. Dividends payable by

11

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates applicable to qualified dividends. Although these rules do not adversely affect the
taxation of REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and
estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends,
which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. However, for taxable years that begin after December
31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates are generally entitled to a deduction equal to 20% of the
aggregate amount of ordinary income dividends received from a REIT, subject to certain limitations.

The REIT ownership limitations and transfer restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation may restrict or prevent certain transfers of
our common stock, could have unintended antitakeover effects and may not be successful in preserving our qualification for taxation as a
REIT.

For us to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, no more than 50% of the value of outstanding shares of our stock may be owned,
beneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each
taxable year beginning with our 2018 taxable year. Also, our capital stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335
days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year beginning with our 2018 taxable year. In addition, a
person actually or constructively owning 10% or more of the vote or value of the shares of our capital stock could lead to a level of affiliation
between the Company and one or more of its tenants that could cause our revenues from such affiliated tenants to not qualify as rents from real
property.

Subject to certain exceptions, our articles of incorporation prohibit any stockholder from owning, beneficially or constructively, more than
(i) 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our capital stock or (ii) 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive,
of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause the
outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a
result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of our outstanding common stock (or the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock) by an
individual or entity could cause that individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to own constructively in excess of the relevant ownership
limits. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common stock, or of any of our other capital stock in violation of these restrictions, may result
in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust or may be void.

We refer to these restrictions collectively as the “ownership limits” and we included them in our articles of incorporation to facilitate our
compliance with REIT tax rules. These ownership limitations may prevent you from engaging in certain transfers of our common stock. Even
though our articles of incorporation contain the ownership limits, there can be no assurance that these provisions will be effective to prevent our
qualification for taxation as a REIT from being jeopardized, including under the affiliated tenant rule. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that
we will be able to enforce the ownership limits. If the restrictions in our articles of incorporation are not effective and, as a result, we fail to satisfy
the REIT tax rules described above, then absent an applicable relief provision, we will fail to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT.

The ownership limitations and transfer restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation may delay, deter or prevent a transaction or a
change in control that might involve a premium price for our stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our shareholders. As a result, the overall
effect of the ownership limitations and transfer restrictions may be to render more difficult or discourage any attempt to acquire us, even if such
acquisition may be favorable to the interests of our shareholders. This potential inability to obtain a premium could reduce the price of our common
stock.

Our cash distributions are not guaranteed and may fluctuate.

A REIT generally is required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders (determined without regard to the
dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains). Generally, we expect to distribute all, or substantially all, of our REIT taxable
income, including net capital gains, so as to not be subject to the income or excise tax on undistributed REIT taxable income. Our board of
directors, in its sole discretion, will determine on a quarterly basis the amount of cash to be distributed to our shareholders based on a number of
factors including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations,
borrowing capacity and other factors, including debt covenant restrictions, that may impose limitations on cash payments and plans for future
acquisitions and divestitures. Consequently, our distribution levels may fluctuate.

Certain of our business activities may be subject to corporate level income tax and other taxes, which would reduce our cash flows, and would
cause potential deferred and contingent tax liabilities.

Our TRS assets and operations will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate rates. We also may be subject
to a variety of other taxes, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property, transfer and

12

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

other taxes on assets and operations. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax, which could be
significant in amount, in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain qualification for taxation as a REIT. We also
could incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS, if they are not conducted on an arm’s length basis, or we also could be subject to tax in
situations and on transactions not presently contemplated. Any of these taxes would decrease our earnings and our available cash.

If we dispose of an asset held at the REIT level during our first five years as a REIT and do not execute a qualifying tax-deferred
exchange, we also may be subject to a federal and state corporate level tax on the gain recognized from such sale, up to the amount of the built-in
gain that existed on January 1, 2017, which is based on the fair market value of such asset in excess of our tax basis in such asset as of January 1,
2017. We currently do not expect to sell any asset if the sale would result in the imposition of a material tax liability. We cannot, however, assure
you that we will not change our plans in this regard.

In addition, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and any state or local tax authority may successfully assert liabilities against us for
corporate income taxes for taxable years prior to the time we qualified as a REIT, in which case we will owe these taxes plus applicable interest and
penalties, if any. Moreover, any increase in taxable income for these pre-REIT periods will likely result in an increase in pre-REIT accumulated
earnings and profits, which could cause us to pay an additional taxable distribution to our shareholders after the relevant determination.

The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions that would be treated as sales
for federal income tax purposes.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. The term “prohibited transaction” generally includes a
sale or other disposition of property (including mortgage loans, but other than foreclosure property, as discussed below) that is held primarily for
sale to customers in the ordinary course of our trade or business. We might be subject to this tax if we were to dispose of or securitize loans in a
manner that was treated as a prohibited transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

We intend to conduct our operations so that no asset that we own (or are treated as owning) will be treated as, or as having been, held for
sale to customers, and that a sale of any such asset will not be treated as having been in the ordinary course of our business. As a result, we may
choose not to engage in certain sales of loans at the REIT level, and may limit the structures we utilize for our securitization transactions, even
though the sales or structures might otherwise be beneficial to us. In addition, whether property is held “primarily for sale to customers in the
ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any property that we sell
will not be treated as property held for sale to customers, or that we can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Code that would prevent
such treatment. The 100% prohibited transaction tax does not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable
corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate rates. We intend to structure our
activities to prevent prohibited transaction characterization.

New legislation or administrative or judicial action, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or
impossible for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or
administrative action at any time, which could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in us. The U.S. federal income tax rules
dealing with REITs are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, which
results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might
affect our investors or us. Revisions in U.S. federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could significantly and negatively affect our ability to
qualify as a REIT and the tax considerations relevant to an investment in us, or could cause us to change our investments and commitments.

You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and
proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our stock.

Changes to the Hawai‘i tax code could result in increased state-level taxation of REITs doing business in Hawai‘i or mandated state-level
withholding of taxes on REIT dividends.

The Hawai‘i State legislature has repeatedly considered, and could consider in the future, legislation that would eliminate (i.e., repeal) the
REIT dividends paid deduction for Hawai‘i State income tax purposes related to income generated in Hawai‘i for a number of years or permanently.
Such a repeal could result in double taxation of REIT income in Hawai‘i under the Hawai‘i tax code, reduce returns to shareholders and make our
stock less attractive to investors, which could in turn lower the value of our stock. The Hawai‘i State legislature also has considered, and could
consider in the future, mandating withholding of Hawai‘i State

13

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

income tax on dividends paid to out-of-state shareholders. Such shareholders may not be able to receive a credit of these taxes from their home
state, thereby resulting in double taxation of such dividends. This could reduce returns to shareholders and make our stock less attractive to
investors, which could in turn lower the value or our stock.

The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification, without shareholder approval, may cause adverse consequences to our
shareholders.

Our articles of incorporation provide that the board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval
of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to be a REIT, we will not
be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income, and we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at
regular corporate rates, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our shareholders.

Risks Related to Our Business

Changes in economic conditions, particularly in Hawai‘i, may adversely affect our Commercial Real Estate, Land Operations, and Materials &
Construction segments.

Our business, including our assets and operations, is concentrated in Hawai‘i, which exposes us to more concentrated risks than if our
assets and operations were more diversely located. A weakening of economic drivers in Hawai‘i, which include tourism, military and consumer
spending, public and private construction starts and spending, personal income growth, and employment, or the weakening of consumer confidence,
market demand, or economic conditions on the Mainland and elsewhere, may adversely affect the level of real estate leasing activity in Hawai‘i, the
demand for or sale of Hawai‘i real estate, and demand for our materials and construction products. In addition, an increase in interest rates or other
factors could reduce the market value of our real estate holdings, as well as increase the cost of buyer financing that may reduce the demand for our
real estate assets.

We may face new or increased competition.

There are numerous other developers, buyers, managers and owners of commercial and residential real estate and undeveloped land that
compete or may compete with us for management and leasing revenues, land for development, properties for acquisition and disposition, and for
tenants and purchasers of properties. Intense competition could lead to increased supply of space, which could then increase vacancies, the need for
increased tenant incentives, decreased rents, sales prices or sales volume, or lack of development opportunities. Additionally, our tenants may face
increased competition and/or shifts in market preferences and demand that adversely impact their performance, ability to pay rent or even their
business viability.

Grace Pacific competes in an industry that favors the lowest bid. Increasing competitive market conditions, including out-of-state or new
in-state contractors competing for a limited number of projects available, could adversely impact our results of operations through market share
erosion due to lost bids, as well as lower pricing and thus lower margins realized on successful bids. Grace also mines aggregate and imports asphalt
for sale. Grace’s customers could seek alternative sources of supply, similar to some of its competitors that are importing liquid asphalt and
aggregate.

Although we intend to market and sell non-strategic assets, many of the assets are relatively illiquid, and it may not be possible to dispose of
such assets in a timely manner or on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Our ability to dispose of non-strategic assets on advantageous terms, including pricing, depends on factors beyond our control, including
but not limited to, competition from other sellers, insufficient infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer and roads) for real estate
assets, the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers and market conditions. As a result, we may be unable to realize our strategy to
simplify through dispositions, or may be unable to do so on advantageous terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating
results and cash flows.

In addition, many of the non-strategic assets are relatively illiquid. Illiquid assets typically experience greater price volatility, as a ready
market does not exist, and can be more difficult to value. In addition, validating third party pricing for illiquid assets may be more subjective than
more liquid assets. As a result, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded such assets.

We may face potential difficulties in obtaining operating and development capital.

The successful execution of our strategy requires substantial amounts of operating and development capital. Sources of such capital could
include banks, life insurance companies, public and private offerings of debt or equity, including rights offerings,

14

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

sale of certain assets and joint venture partners. If our credit profile deteriorates significantly, our access to the debt capital markets or our ability to
renew our committed lines of credit may become restricted, the cost to borrow may increase, or we may not be able to refinance debt at the same
levels or on the same terms. Further, we rely on our ability to obtain and draw on a revolving credit facility to support our operations. Volatility in
the credit and financial markets or deterioration in our credit profile may prevent us from accessing funds. There is no assurance that any capital
will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, to satisfy our short or long-term cash needs.

We may raise additional capital in the future on terms that are more stringent to us, that could provide holders of new issuances rights,
preferences and privileges that are senior to those currently held by our common stockholders, or that could result in dilution of common stock
ownership.

To execute our business strategy, we may require additional capital. If we incur additional debt or raise equity, the terms of the debt or
equity issued may give the holders rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock, particularly in the event of
liquidation. The terms of any new debt may also impose additional and more stringent restrictions on our operations than currently in place. If we
issue additional common equity, either through public or private offerings or rights offerings, your percentage ownership in us would decline if you
do not participate on a ratable basis.

Failure to comply with certain restrictive financial covenants contained in our credit facilities could impose restrictions on our business
segments, capital availability or the ability to pursue other activities.

Our credit facilities and term debt contain certain restrictive financial covenants. If we breach any of the covenants and such breach is not
cured in a timely manner or waived by the lenders, and results in default, our access to credit may be limited or terminated and the lenders could
declare any outstanding amounts immediately due and payable. We further may be limited in our ability to make distributions to our shareholders in
event of default.

Increasing interest rates would increase our overall interest expense.

Interest expense on our floating-rate debt ($148.7 million as of December 31, 2019) would increase if interest rates rise. Additionally, the
interest expense associated with fixed-rate debt could rise in future periods when the debt matures and is refinanced. Furthermore, the value of our
commercial real estate portfolio and the market price of our stock could decline if market interest rates increase and investors seek alternative
investments with higher distribution rates.

Our significant agreements and leases could be replaced on less favorable terms or may not be replaced.

Our various businesses have significant agreements and leases that expire at various points in the future. These agreements and leases may
not be renewed or could be replaced on less favorable terms.

An increase in fuel prices may adversely affect our operating environment and costs.

Fuel prices have a direct impact on the health of the Hawai‘i economy. Increases in the price of fuel may result in higher transportation
costs to Hawai‘i and adversely affect visitor counts and the cost of goods shipped to Hawai‘i, thereby affecting the strength of the Hawai‘i economy
and its consumers. Increases in fuel costs also can lead to other non-recoverable, direct expense increases to us through, for example, increased
costs of energy and petroleum-based raw materials used in the production of aggregate, and the manufacture, transportation, and placement of hot
mix asphalt. Increases in energy costs for our leased real estate portfolio are typically recovered from lessees, although our share of energy costs
increases as a result of lower occupancies, and higher operating cost reimbursements impact the ability to increase underlying rents. Rising fuel
prices also may increase the cost of construction, including delivery costs to Hawai‘i, and the cost of materials that are petroleum-based, thus
affecting our real estate development projects and margins.

Noncompliance with, or changes to, federal, state or local law or regulations may adversely affect our business.

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations, including government rate, land use, environmental and tax regulations.
Noncompliance with, or changes to, the laws and regulations governing our business could impose significant additional costs on us and adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations. For example, the real estate segments are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws
and regulations, which, if changed or not complied with, may adversely affect our business. We frequently utilize §1031 of the Code to defer taxes
when selling qualifying real estate and reinvesting the proceeds in replacement properties. This often occurs when we sell bulk parcels of land in
Hawai‘i or commercial properties in Hawai‘i, all of which typically have a very low tax basis. A repeal of, or adverse amendment to, §1031 of the
Code, which has often been considered by Congress, could impose significant additional costs on us. We are subject to Occupational Safety and
Health Administration regulations, Environmental Protection Agency regulations, and state and county permits related to our operations. The
Materials & Construction segment is additionally subject to Mine Safety and Health Administration regulations.

15

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Changes to, or our violation of or inability to comply with, any of the laws, regulations and permits mentioned above could increase our
operating costs or ability to operate the affected line of business.

Work stoppages or other labor disruptions by our unionized employees or those of other companies in related industries, may increase operating
costs or adversely affect our ability to conduct business.

Many of our regular full-time employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with unions. We may be adversely affected by
actions taken by our employees or those of other companies in related industries against efforts by management to control labor costs, restrain wage
or benefits increases or modify work practices. Strikes and disruptions may occur as a result of our failure, or that of other companies in our
industry, to negotiate collective bargaining agreements with such unions successfully. For example, in our Materials & Construction segment, a
labor disruption resulting from a unionized workforce stoppage may significantly impede our production and ability to complete projects that are in
process. Additionally, in our Land Operations segment, we may be unable to complete a development-for-sale project if building materials or labor
are unavailable due to labor disruptions in the relevant trade groups.

The loss of, or damage to, key vendor and customer relationships may impact our ability to conduct business and adversely affect our
profitability.

Our business is dependent on our relationships with key vendors, customers and tenants. The loss of, or damage to, any of these key
relationships may impact our ability to conduct business and adversely affect our profitability.

Interruption, breaches or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our ability to operate, adversely
affect our financial condition, and damage our reputation.

We rely extensively on information technology and communication systems to process transactions and to operate and manage our
business. Information technology and communication systems are subject to reliability issues, integration and compatibility concerns, and
cybersecurity-threatening intrusions. Further, we may experience failures caused by the occurrence of a natural disaster, terrorism, war, the
intentional or inadvertent acts and errors by our employees or vendors, or other problems at our facilities. Despite our implementation of security
measures, there can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our systems will be effective or that attempted security
breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Any failure, or security breaches, of our systems could result in improper uses of our
systems and networks and interruptions in our operations, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our income, cash flow, results of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, and reputation. We may incur significant costs to remedy damages caused by disruptions to our systems.
Similarly, our vendors and tenants rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage their businesses and, thus, are also at
risk from, and may be impacted by, cybersecurity attacks. An interruption in the business operations of our vendors and tenants resulting from a
cybersecurity attack could indirectly impact our business operations.

Weather, natural disasters and the impacts of climate change may adversely affect our business.

As a result of climate change, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, including natural
disasters. Should the impact of climate change be significant or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations
would be adversely affected.

Our Commercial Real Estate and Land Operations segments are vulnerable to natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis,
floods, fires, tornadoes and unusually heavy or prolonged rain, which could cause personal injury and loss of life. In addition, natural disasters could
damage our real estate holdings, which could result in substantial repair or replacement costs to the extent not covered by insurance, a reduction in
property values, or a loss of revenue, and could have an adverse effect on our ability to develop, lease and sell properties. The occurrence of natural
disasters could also cause increases in property insurance rates and deductibles, which could reduce demand for, or increase the cost of, owning or
developing our properties.

Drought, greater than normal rainfall, hurricanes, low-wind conditions, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, fires, other natural disasters,
agricultural pestilence, or negligence or intentional malfeasance by individuals, may also adversely impact the conditions of the land and thereby
harming the prospects for the Land Operations segment, including our renewable energy operations, and our land infrastructure and facilities,
including dams and reservoirs.

For the Materials & Construction segment, because nearly all of the segment’s activities are performed outdoors, its operations are
substantially dependent on weather conditions. For example, periods of wet or other adverse weather conditions could interrupt paving activities,
resulting in delayed or loss of revenue, under-utilization of crews and equipment and less efficient rates of overhead recovery. Adverse weather
conditions also restrict the demand for aggregate products, increase aggregate production costs and impede its ability to efficiently transport
material.

16

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

We maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate. These policies are generally subject to large
retentions and deductibles. Some types of losses, such as losses resulting from physical damage to dams, generally are not insured. In some cases,
we retain the entire risk of loss because it is not economically prudent to purchase insurance coverage or because of the perceived remoteness of the
risk. Other risks are uninsured because insurance coverage may not be commercially available. Finally, we retain all risk of loss that exceeds the
limits of our insurance.

Political crises, public health crises and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations and profitability.

Political crises (including but not limited to heightened security measures, war, actual or threatened terrorist attacks, efforts to combat
terrorism or other acts of violence) and public health crises (including but not limited to pandemics and epidemics from the outbreak of any
contagious diseases) may cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease, or may affect the ability or willingness of tourists to travel to
Hawai‘i, thereby adversely affecting Hawai‘i’s economy and us. Further, as our business is concentrated in Hawai‘i, an attack on Hawai‘i as a result
of war or terrorism may severely or irreparably harm the Company, including our real estate holdings, our facilities, our information technology
systems and our personnel.

Such events beyond our control could adversely affect trade and global and local economies and may lead to actions limiting trade and
population movement and the movement of goods through the supply chain, as well as other impacts to business and consumer demand, which may
adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. For example, in December 2019, a strain of coronavirus was
reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, resulting in a public health crisis. At this point, the extent to which the coronavirus may impact our
results is uncertain.

Loss of our key personnel could adversely affect our business.

Our future success will depend, in significant part, upon the continued services of our key personnel, including our senior management and
skilled employees. The loss of the services of key personnel could adversely affect our future operating results, because of such employee’s
experience, knowledge of our business and relationships. If key employees depart, we may have to incur significant costs to replace them, and our
ability to execute our business model could be impaired if we cannot replace them in a timely manner. We do not maintain key person insurance on
any of our personnel.

We are subject to, and may in the future be subject to, disputes, legal or other proceedings, or government inquiries or investigations, that could
have an adverse effect on us.

The nature of our business exposes us to the potential for disputes, legal or other proceedings, or government inquiries or investigations,
relating to labor and employment matters, contractual disputes, personal injury and property damage, environmental matters, construction litigation,
business practices, and other matters, as discussed in the other risk factors disclosed in this section. These disputes, individually or collectively,
could harm our business by distracting our management from the operation of our business. If these disputes develop into proceedings, these
proceedings, individually or collectively, could involve or result in significant expenditures or losses by us. As a real estate developer, we may face
warranty and construction defect claims, as described below under “Risks Relating to Our Land Operations Segment.”

Changes in the value of pension assets, or a change in pension law or key assumptions, may result in increased expenses or plan contributions.

The amount of our employee pension and postretirement benefit costs and obligations are calculated on assumptions used in the relevant
actuarial calculations. Adverse changes in any of these assumptions due to economic or other factors, changes in discount rates, higher health care
costs, or lower actual or expected returns on plan assets, may result in increased cost or required plan contributions. In addition, a change in federal
law, including changes to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premiums, may adversely
affect our single-employer pension plans and plan funding. These factors, as well as a decline in the fair value of pension plan assets, may put
upward pressure on the cost of providing pension and medical benefits and may increase future pension expense and required funding contributions.
Although we have actively sought to control increases in these costs, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in limiting future cost and
expense increases.

Impairment in the carrying value of long-lived assets and goodwill could negatively affect our operating results.

We have a significant amount of long-lived assets and goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet and have recorded non-cash impairment
charges in the past. Under generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived assets are required to be reviewed for impairment whenever adverse
events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. If business conditions or other factors cause profitability and cash flows to
decline, we may be required to record additional non-cash impairment charges. Goodwill must be evaluated for impairment annually or more
frequently if events indicate it is warranted. If the carrying value of our reporting units exceeds their current fair value as determined based on the
discounted future cash flows

17

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

of the related business, the goodwill is considered impaired and is reduced to fair value by a non-cash charge to earnings. Events and conditions that
could result in further impairment in the value of our long-lived assets and goodwill include changes in the industries in which we operate,
particularly the impact of a downturn in the global or Hawai‘i economy, as well as competition and advances in technology, adverse changes in the
regulatory environment, or other factors leading to reduction in expected long-term sales or profitability.

Risks Relating to Our Commercial Real Estate Segment

We are subject to a number of factors that could cause leasing rental income to decline.

We own a portfolio of commercial real estate assets. Factors that may adversely affect the portfolio’s profitability include, but are not
limited to:

• a significant number of our tenants are unable to meet their obligations;

• increases in non-recoverable operating and ownership costs;
• we are unable to lease space at our properties when the space becomes available;
• the rental rates upon a renewal or a new lease are significantly lower than prior rents or do not increase sufficiently to cover increases in
operating and ownership costs;
• the providing of lease concessions, such as free or discounted rents and tenant improvement allowances; and
• the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues at the property.

The bankruptcy or loss of key tenants in our commercial real estate portfolio may adversely affect our cash flows and profitability.

We may derive significant cash flows and earnings from certain key tenants. If one or more of these tenants declares bankruptcy or
voluntarily vacates from the leased premise and we are unable to re-lease such space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms, we
may be adversely impacted. Additionally, we may be further adversely impacted by an impairment or “write-down” of intangible assets, such as
lease-in-place value, favorable lease asset, or a deferred asset related to straight-line lease rent, associated with a tenant bankruptcy or vacancy.

A shift in retail shopping from brick and mortar stores to online shopping may have an adverse impact on our cash flow, financial condition
and results of operations.

Many retailers operating brick and mortar stores have made online sales an important part of their business. Although many of the retailers
operating at our properties sell groceries and other necessity-based soft goods or provide services, including entertainment and dining options, the
shift to online shopping may cause declines in brick and mortar sales generated by certain of our tenants and/or may cause certain of our tenants to
reduce the size or number of their retail locations in the future. As a result, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be
adversely affected.

We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, or re-lease space as leases expire, thereby increasing or prolonging vacancies, which
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We may not be able to renew leases, lease vacant space, or re-let space as leases expire. In addition, we may need to offer substantial rent
abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights, or below-market renewal options to retain existing tenants or attract new tenants. If the
rental rates for our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases, or we do not re-let our available space, our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Increases in operating expenses could adversely affect our operating results.

Our operating expenses include, but are not limited to, property taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, and the maintenance of the common
areas of our commercial real estate. We may experience increases in our operating expenses, some or all of which may be out of our control. Most
of our leases require that tenants pay for a share of property taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs. However, if any property is not
fully occupied, or if recovery income from tenants is not sufficient to cover operating expenses, then we could be required to expend our own funds
for operating expenses. In addition, we may be unable to renew leases or negotiate new leases with terms requiring our tenants to pay all the
property tax, insurance, and common area maintenance costs that tenants currently pay, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our retail centers may depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of, or a store
closure by, one or more of these tenants.

18

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Some of our retail centers are anchored by large tenants. At any time, our tenants may experience a downturn in their business that may
significantly weaken their financial condition. As a result, our tenants, including our anchor and other major tenants, may fail to comply with their
contractual obligations to us, seek concessions in order to continue operations, or declare bankruptcy, any of which could result in the termination of
such tenants’ leases and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. In addition, certain of our tenants may cease operations while
continuing to pay rent, which could decrease customer traffic, thereby decreasing sales for our other tenants at the applicable retail property. In
addition, mergers or consolidations among retail establishments could result in the closure of existing stores or the duplication or geographic
overlapping of store locations, which could include stores at our retail centers.

Loss of, or a store closure by, an anchor store or major tenant could significantly reduce our occupancy level or the rent that we receive
from our retail centers. We may be unable to re-lease vacated space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms, or at all. In the event of
default by an anchor store or major tenant, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us
under the terms of our agreements with such parties.

Certain of our leases at our retail centers contain “co-tenancy” or “go-dark” provisions, which, if triggered, may allow tenants to pay reduced
rent, cease operations, or terminate their leases, which could adversely affect our performance or the value of the applicable retail property.

Certain of the leases at our retail centers contain “co-tenancy” provisions that establish conditions related to a tenant’s obligation to remain
open, the amount of rent payable by the tenant, or a tenant’s obligation to continue occupying space, including (i) the presence of a certain anchor
tenant, (ii) the continued operation of an anchor tenant’s store, and (iii) minimum occupancy levels at the applicable retail center. If a co-tenancy
provision is triggered by a failure of any of these conditions, a tenant could have the right to cease operations, to terminate its lease early, or to a
reduction of its rent. In addition to these co-tenancy provisions, certain of the leases at our retail centers contain “go-dark” provisions that allow the
tenant to cease operations while continuing to pay rent. This could result in decreased customer traffic at the applicable retail center, thereby
decreasing sales for our other tenants at such retail center, which may result in our other tenants being unable to pay their minimum rents or expense
recovery charges. Such provisions may also result in lower rental revenue generated under the applicable leases. To the extent co-tenancy or go-
dark provisions in our leases result in lower revenue or tenant sales, tenants’ rights to terminate their leases early, or to a reduction of their rent, our
performance or the value of the applicable retail center could be adversely affected.

We are subject to risks that affect the general retail environment, such as weakness in the economy, the level of consumer spending, the adverse
financial condition of retailing companies, and competition from discount and internet retailers, which could adversely affect market rents for
retail space and the willingness or ability of retailers to lease space in our retail center.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company owned twenty-two retail centers. The retail environment and the market for retail space could be
adversely affected by weakness in the local and broader economy, the level of consumer spending and consumer confidence, the adverse financial
condition of large retail companies, consolidation in the retail sector, excess amount of retail space, and increasing competition from discount
retailers, outlet malls, internet retailers, and other online businesses.

Our financial results are significantly influenced by the economic growth and strength of Hawai‘i.

All of our redevelopment and development-for-hold activity, and all of our improved properties and ground leases in our commercial real
estate portfolio, are in Hawai‘i. Consequently, the growth and strength of Hawai‘i’s economy has a significant impact on the demand for our real
estate development projects. As a result, any adverse change to the growth or health of Hawai‘i’s economy could have an adverse effect on our
commercial real estate business.

The value of our development-for-hold projects and commercial properties is affected by a number of factors.

We have significant investments in various commercial real estate properties and development-for-hold projects. Weakness in the real
estate sector, especially in Hawai‘i, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing, and changes in our investment and redevelopment
and development-for-hold strategy, among other factors, may affect the fair value of these real estate assets. If the undiscounted cash flows of our
commercial properties, or redevelopment or development-for-hold projects, were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, we would be
required to recognize an impairment loss if the fair value of those assets were below their carrying value.

We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of properties that meet our criteria, which may impede our growth.

Our business strategy involves the acquisition of retail, office, industrial, and other properties. These activities require us to identify
suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet our criteria. We evaluate the market of available properties and may attempt to
acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist. We may be unable to acquire properties that

19

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

we have identified as potential acquisition opportunities due to various factors, including but not limited to, the inability to (i) negotiate terms
agreeable to the parties involved, (ii) satisfy conditions to closing, or (iii) finance the acquisition on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, we may
incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with evaluating and negotiating potential acquisitions, including ones that we
are subsequently not able to complete. If we are unable to acquire properties on favorable terms, or at all, our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flow could be adversely affected.

We face competition for the acquisition and development of real estate properties, which may impede our ability to grow our operations or may
increase the cost of these activities.

We compete with many other entities for the acquisition of commercial real estate and land suitable for new developments, including other
REITs, private institutional investors, and other owner-operators of commercial real estate. Larger REITs may enjoy competitive advantages that
result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital. These competitors may increase the market prices we would have to pay in order to acquire
properties. If we are unable to acquire properties that meet our criteria at prices we deem reasonable, our ability to grow may be adversely affected.

We are subject to risks associated with real estate construction and development.

Our redevelopment and development-for-hold projects are subject to risks relating to our ability to complete our projects on time and on
budget. Factors that may result in a development project exceeding budget or being prevented from completion include, but are not limited to:

• our inability to secure sufficient financing or insurance on favorable terms, or at all;

• construction delays, defects, or cost overruns, which may increase project development costs;
• an increase in commodity or construction costs, including labor costs;
• the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues;
• an inability to obtain, or a significant delay in obtaining, zoning, construction, occupancy and other required governmental permits and
authorizations;
• difficulty in complying with local, city, county and state rules and regulations regarding permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities, and
water quality, as well as federal rules and regulations regarding air and water quality and protection of endangered species and their
habitats;
• insufficient infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer and roads) to serve the needs of our projects;
• an inability to secure tenants necessary to support the project or maintain compliance with debt covenants;
• failure to achieve or sustain anticipated occupancy levels;
• condemnation of all or parts of development or operating properties, which could adversely affect the value or viability of such projects;
and
• instability in the financial industry could reduce the availability of financing.

Significant instability in the financial industry like that experienced during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, may result in, among other
things, declining property values and increasing defaults on loans. This, in turn, could lead to increased regulations, tightened credit requirements,
reduced liquidity and increased credit risk premiums for virtually all borrowers. Deterioration in the credit environment may also impact us in other
ways, including the credit or solvency of vendors, tenants, or joint venture partners, the ability of partners to fund their financial obligations to joint
ventures and our access to mortgage financing for our own properties.

Commercial real estate investments are relatively illiquid.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing
economic, financial and investment conditions is limited.  The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions,
supply and demand, availability of financing, interest rates, and other factors that are beyond our control.  We cannot be certain that we will be able
to sell any property for the price and other terms we seek, or that any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to
us.  We also cannot estimate with certainty the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to complete the sale of a property.  Factors that
impede our ability to dispose of properties could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

20

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Risks Relating to Our Land Operations Segment

We are subject to risks associated with real estate construction and development.

Our development-for-sale projects are subject to risks that are similar to those described in the “We are subject to risks associated with
real estate construction and development” risk factor above, under the “Risks Relating to Our Commercial Real Estate Segment” section.

Significant instability in the financial industry, like that experienced during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, may result in, among other
things, declining property values and increasing defaults on loans. This, in turn, could lead to increased regulations, tightened credit requirements,
reduced liquidity and increased credit risk premiums for virtually all borrowers. Fewer loan products and strict loan qualifications make it more
difficult for borrowers to finance the purchase of units in our projects. Additionally, more stringent requirements to obtain financing for buyers of
commercial properties make it significantly more difficult for us to sell commercial properties and may negatively impact the sales prices and other
terms of such sales. Deterioration in the credit environment may also impact us in other ways, including the credit or solvency of customers,
vendors, or joint venture partners, the ability of partners to fund their financial obligations to joint ventures and our access to mortgage financing for
our own properties.

Governmental entities have adopted or may adopt regulatory requirements that may restrict our development activity.

We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the land development process, including laws and regulations
related to zoning and permitted land uses. Government entities have adopted or may approve regulations or laws that could negatively impact the
availability of land and development opportunities within those areas. It is possible that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on
developers in the future that could adversely affect our ability to develop projects in the affected markets or could require that we satisfy additional
administrative and regulatory requirements, which could delay development progress or increase the development costs to us.

Real estate development projects are subject to warranty and construction defect claims, in the ordinary course of business, that can be
significant.

In our development-for-sale projects, we are subject to warranty and construction defect claims arising in the ordinary course of business.
The amounts payable under these claims, both in legal fees and remedying any construction defects, can be significant and could exceed the profits
made from the project. As a consequence, we may maintain liability insurance, obtain indemnities and certificates of insurance from contractors
generally covering claims related to workmanship and materials, and create warranty and other reserves for projects based on historical experience
and qualitative risks associated with the type of project built. Because of the uncertainties inherent in these matters, we cannot provide any
assurance that our insurance coverage, contractor arrangements and reserves will be adequate to address some or all of our warranty and
construction defect claims in the future. For example, contractual indemnities may be difficult to enforce, we may be responsible for applicable self-
insured retentions, and certain claims may not be covered by insurance or may exceed applicable coverage limits. Additionally, the coverage
offered, and the availability of liability insurance for construction defects, could be limited or costly. Accordingly, we cannot provide any assurance
that such coverage will be adequate, available at an acceptable cost, or available at all.

We are involved in joint ventures and subject to risks associated with joint venture relationships.

We are involved in joint venture relationships and may initiate future joint venture projects. A joint venture involves certain risks, such as,
among others:

• we may not have voting control over the joint venture;

• we may not be able to maintain good relationships with our venture partners;
• the venture partner, at any time, may have economic or business interests that are inconsistent with our economic or business interests;
• the venture partner may fail to fund its share of capital for operations and development activities or to fulfill its other commitments,
including providing accurate and timely accounting and financial information to us;
• the joint venture or venture partner could lose key personnel;
• the venture partner could become insolvent, requiring us to assume all risks and capital requirements related to the joint venture project,
and any resulting bankruptcy proceedings could have an adverse impact on the operation of the project or the joint venture; and
• we may be required to perform on guarantees we have provided, or agree to provide in the future, related to the completion of a joint
venture’s construction and development of a project, joint venture indebtedness, or on indemnification of a third party serving as surety for
a joint venture’s bonds for such completion.

21

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Our financial results are significantly influenced by the economic growth and strength of Hawai‘i.

Virtually all of our real estate development activity is conducted in Hawai‘i. Consequently, the growth and strength of Hawai‘i’s economy
has a significant impact on the demand for our real estate development projects. As a result, any adverse change to the growth or health of Hawai‘i’s
economy could have an adverse effect on our real estate business.

The value of our development projects and/or our joint venture investments is affected by a number of factors.

We have significant investments in various development projects and joint venture investments. Weakness in the real estate sector,
especially in Hawai‘i, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing, difficulty in obtaining governmental permits and authorizations,
difficulty in securing infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer, and roads), and changes in our investment and development strategy,
among other factors, may affect the fair value of these real estate assets owned by us or by our joint ventures. If the fair value of our joint venture
development projects were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, and that decline was other-than-temporary, we would be required to
recognize an impairment loss. Additionally, if the undiscounted cash flows of our development projects were to decline below the carrying value of
those assets, we would be required to recognize an impairment loss if the fair value of those assets were below their carrying value.

Our ability to use or lease agricultural lands for agricultural purposes may be limited by government regulation.

Given the large scale of our agricultural landholdings on Kauai, many of the third parties to whom we lease land for agricultural purposes
may be characterized as large scale commercial agricultural operations. Legislation passed on Kauai placed restrictions on the ability of such
operations to use land within specified distances of highways, schools, oceans, streams, residences, parks, care homes, hospitals and other similar
uses, to grow crops other than ground cover. This legislation also put significant restrictions regarding, and public notification obligations
concerning, pesticide use on such operations and limited their ability to use genetically modified organism (GMO) crops. In November 2016, the
Kauai legislation was invalidated by the courts. If additional legislative agricultural restrictions are passed, such as restrictions on the use of
pesticides, our ability to use or lease lands for large scale agricultural purposes, and any rents that we can achieve for those lands, may be adversely
affected.

Agricultural land is illiquid and difficult to value.

Even if qualified farm lessees can be identified and engaged in leases, agricultural operations are high risk by nature and turnover can be
expected. From a landlord’s perspective, agricultural leases produce only modest rents that could imply a valuation of the land that could materially
understate other methods of appraising asset value.

Our power sales contracts could be replaced on less favorable terms or may not be replaced.

Our power sales contracts expire at various points in the future and may not be replaced or could be replaced on less favorable terms,
which could adversely affect Land Operations profitability.

The market for power sales in Hawai‘i is limited.

The power distribution systems in Hawai‘i are small and island-specific; currently, there is no ability to move power generated on one
island to any other island. In addition, Hawai‘i law generally limits the ability of independent power producers, such as us, to sell their output to
firms other than the respective utilities on each island, without themselves becoming utilities and subject to the State’s Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) regulation. Further, any sales of electricity by us to the utilities on each island are subject to the approval of the PUC. Unlike some areas in
the Mainland, Hawai‘i’s independent power producers have no ability to use utility infrastructure to transfer power to other locations.

The lack of water for agricultural irrigation could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Land Operations segment.

It is crucial to have access to sufficient, reliable and affordable sources of water in order to conduct sustainable agricultural activity on our
lands. Existing infrastructure serving these agricultural lands rely on the collection and transmission of surface waters. If the ability to divert surface
waters for agricultural use is limited or there is insufficient rainfall on an extended basis, this would have a significant, adverse effect on the utility
of the land and our ability to employ the land in active agricultural use. On Maui and Kauai, where our agricultural lands are located, there are
regulatory and legal challenges to water diversion from streams.

Water availability also is critical to the successful implementation of farming plans on those lands purchased from us by Mahi Pono
Holdings LLC ("Mahi Pono") in conjunction with our sale of certain agricultural landholdings on Maui (the "Agricultural Land Sale"). As described
in our public filings associated with that sale, as well as Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements,

22

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

if Mahi Pono is unable to secure sufficient water to support the agricultural plans for which it purchased the lands, this could trigger certain
financial obligations.

Governmental entities have adopted or may adopt regulatory requirements related to our dams, reservoirs, and other water infrastructure that
may adversely affect our operations.

We are subject to inspections and regulations that apply to certain of our dams, reservoirs, and other water infrastructure. Certain of these
facilities have deficiencies noted by the State of Hawai‘i, which we are working with the regulators to resolve. It is possible that current or future
requirements imposed on landowners and dam owners/operators may require that we satisfy additional administrative and regulatory requirements
and thereby increase the holding costs to us and/or decrease the operational utility of the subject facilities.

Risks Relating to Our Materials & Construction Segment

Our Materials & Construction segment’s revenue growth and profitability are dependent on factors outside of our control.

Our Materials & Construction segment’s ability to grow its revenues and improve profitability is dependent on factors outside of our
control, which include, but are not limited to:

• decreased government funding for infrastructure projects (see the “Economic downturns or reductions in government funding of
infrastructure projects could reduce our revenues and profits from our materials and construction businesses” risk factor below);
• reduced spending by private sector customers resulting from poor economic conditions in Hawai‘i;
• an increased number of competitors;
• less success in competitive bidding for contracts;
• a decline in transportation and logistical costs, which may result in customers purchasing material from sources located outside of Hawai‘i
in a more cost-efficient manner;
• limitations on access to necessary working capital and investment capital to sustain growth; and
• inability to hire and retain essential personnel and to acquire equipment to support growth.

Economic downturns or reductions in government funding of infrastructure projects could reduce our revenues and profits from our materials
and construction businesses.

The segment’s products are used in public infrastructure projects, which include the construction, maintenance and improvement of
highways, streets, roads, airport runways and similar projects. Our materials and construction businesses, including our aggregates business, are
highly dependent on the amount and timing of infrastructure work funded by various governmental entities, which, in turn, depends on the overall
condition of the economy, the need for new or replacement infrastructure, the priorities placed on various projects funded by governmental entities
and federal, state or local government spending levels. We cannot be assured of the existence, amount and timing of appropriations for spending on
these and other future projects, including state and federal spending on roads and highways. Spending on infrastructure could decline for numerous
reasons, including decreased revenues received by state and local governments for spending on such projects (including federal funding), and other
competing priorities for available state, local and federal funds. State spending on highway and other projects can be adversely affected by
decreases or delays in, or uncertainties regarding, federal highway funding. The segment is reliant upon contracts with the City and County of
Honolulu, the State of Hawai‘i and the Federal Government for a significant portion of its revenues. If revenues and profits are impacted by
economic downturns or reductions in government funding, the segment’s long-lived assets and goodwill may become impaired.

We may face community opposition to the operation or expansion of quarries or other facilities.

Quarries and other segment facilities require special and conditional use permits to operate. Permitting and licensing applications and
proceedings and regulatory enforcement proceedings are all matters open to public scrutiny and comment. In addition, the Makakilo quarry is
adjacent to residential areas and heavy equipment and explosives are used in the mining process. As a result, from time to time, our Materials &
Construction segment operations may be subject to community opposition and adverse publicity that may have a negative effect on operations and
delay or limit any future expansion or development of segment operations.

Significant contracts may be canceled, or we may be disqualified from bidding for new contracts.

Governmental entities typically have the right to cancel their contracts with our construction businesses at any time with payment
generally only for the work already completed plus a negotiated compensatory overhead recovery amount. In addition,

23

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

our construction businesses could be prohibited from bidding on certain governmental contracts if we fail to maintain qualifications required by
those entities, such as maintaining an acceptable safety record.

If our materials and construction businesses are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, requirements or costs when bidding on or
negotiating a contract that we are ultimately awarded, the segment may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on the contract.

The majority of the Materials & Construction segment’s revenues are derived from “quantity pricing” (fixed unit price) contracts. Quantity
pricing contracts require the provision of line-item materials at a fixed unit price based on approved quantities irrespective of actual per unit costs.
Expected profits on contracts are realized only if costs are accurately estimated and then successfully controlled. If cost estimates for a contract are
inaccurate, or if the contract is not performed within cost estimates, then cost overruns may result in losses or cause the contract not to be as
profitable as expected.

If our materials and construction businesses are unable to attract and retain key personnel and skilled labor, or encounter labor difficulties, the
ability to bid for and successfully complete contracts may be negatively impacted.

The ability to attract and retain reliable, qualified personnel is a significant factor that enables our materials and construction businesses to
successfully bid for and profitably complete their work. This includes members of management, project managers, estimators, supervisors, and
foremen. The segment’s future success also will depend on its ability to hire, train and retain, or to attract, when needed, highly skilled management
personnel. If competition for these employees is intense, it could be difficult to hire and retain the personnel necessary to support operations. If we
do not succeed in retaining our current employees and attracting, developing and retaining new highly skilled employees, segment operations and
future earnings may be negatively impacted.

A majority of segment personnel are unionized. Any work stoppage or other labor dispute involving unionized workforce, or inability to
renew contracts with the unions, could have an adverse effect on operations.

Our construction and construction-related businesses may fail to meet schedule or performance requirements of our paving contracts.

Asphalt paving contracts have penalties for late completion. In most instances, projects must be completed within an allotted number of
business or calendar days from the time the notice to proceed is received, subject to allowances for additional days due to weather delays or
additional work requested by the customer. If our construction businesses subsequently fail to complete the project as scheduled, we may be
responsible for contractually agreed-upon liquidated damages, an amount assessed per day beyond the contractually allotted days, at the discretion
of the customer. Under these circumstances, the total project cost could exceed original estimates and could result in a loss of profit or a loss on the
project. Additionally, our construction businesses enter into lump sum and quantity pricing contracts where profits can be adversely affected by a
number of factors beyond our control, which can cause actual costs to materially exceed the costs estimated at the time of our original bid.

Timing of the award and performance of new contracts could have an adverse effect on Materials & Construction segment operating results
and cash flow.

It is generally very difficult to predict whether and when bids for new projects will be offered for tender, as these projects frequently
involve a lengthy and complex design and bidding process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as market conditions, funding
arrangements and governmental approvals. Because of these factors, segment results of operations and cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to
quarter and year to year, and the fluctuation may be substantial.

The uncertainty of the timing of contract awards after a winning bid is submitted may also present difficulties in matching the size of
equipment fleet and work crews with contract needs. In some cases, our materials and construction businesses may maintain and bear the cost of
more equipment than is currently required, in anticipation of future needs for existing contracts or expected future contracts.

In addition, the timing of the revenues, earnings and cash flows from contracts can be delayed by a number of factors, including delays in
receiving material and equipment from suppliers and services from subcontractors and changes in the scope of work to be performed.

24

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Dependence on a limited number of customers could adversely affect our materials and construction businesses and results of operations.

Due to the size and nature of the segment’s construction contracts, one or a few customers, such as the Federal Government, the State of
Hawai‘i, and the various counties in Hawai‘i, have in the past and may in the future represent a substantial portion of consolidated segment
revenues and gross profits in any one year or over a period of several consecutive years. Similarly, segment backlog frequently reflects multiple
contracts for certain customers; therefore, one customer may comprise a significant percentage of backlog at a certain point in time. The loss of
business from any such customer, or a default or delay in payment on a significant scale by a customer, could have an adverse effect on our
materials and construction businesses or results of operations.

Our materials and construction businesses are likely to require more capital over the longer term.

The property and machinery needed to produce aggregate products and perform asphaltic concrete paving contracts are expensive.
Although capital needs over the next five years are expected to be relatively modest, over the longer term, our materials and construction businesses
may require increasing annual capital expenditures. The segment’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow to fund these expenditures depends on
future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business, and other factors affecting
operations, many of which are beyond our control. If the segment is unable to generate sufficient cash to operate its businesses, it may be required,
among other things, to further reduce or delay planned capital or operating expenditures.

An inability to obtain bonding could limit the aggregate dollar amount of contracts that our materials and construction businesses are able to
pursue.

As is customary in the construction industry, we may be required to provide surety bonds to our customers to secure our performance
under construction contracts. Our ability to obtain surety bonds primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past performance,
management expertise and reputation and certain external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety market. Surety companies consider
such factors in relationship to the amount of backlog and their underwriting standards, which may change from time to time. Events that adversely
affect the insurance and bonding markets generally may result in bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at
a significantly greater cost. The inability to obtain adequate bonding would limit the amount that our construction businesses are able to bid on new
contracts and could have an adverse effect on the segment’s future revenues and business prospects.

Our Materials & Construction segment operations are subject to hazards that may cause personal injury or property damage, thereby subjecting
us to liabilities and possible losses, which may not be covered by insurance.

Segment employees are subject to the usual hazards associated with performing construction activities on road construction sites, plants
and quarries. Operating hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, plant and equipment and
environmental damage. We maintain general liability and excess liability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, auto insurance and other
types of insurance, all in amounts consistent with our materials and construction businesses’ risk of loss and industry practice, but this insurance
may not be adequate to cover all losses or liabilities incurred in operations.

Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of
liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of the segment’s safety program. If insurance
claims or costs were above our estimates, our materials and construction businesses might be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims,
which could impact their ability to maintain or expand their operations.

Environmental and other regulatory matters could adversely affect our materials and construction businesses’ ability to conduct business and
could require significant expenditures.

Segment operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations relating to the management, disposal and remediation of
hazardous substances, climate change and the emission and discharge of pollutants into the air and water. Our materials and construction businesses
could be held liable for such contamination created not only from their own activities but also from the historical activities of others on properties
that the segment acquires or leases. Segment operations are also subject to laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health,
which, among other things, regulate employee exposure to hazardous substances. Violations of such laws and regulations could subject us to
substantial fines and penalties, cleanup costs, third-party property damage or personal injury claims. In addition, these laws and regulations have
become, and enforcement practices and compliance standards are becoming, increasingly stringent. Moreover, we cannot predict the nature, scope
or effect of legislation or regulatory requirements that could be imposed, or how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or
interpreted, with respect to products or activities to which they have not been previously applied. Compliance with more stringent laws or
regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of the regulatory agencies, could require substantial expenditures

25

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

for, among other things, equipment not currently possessed, or the acquisition or modification of permits applicable to segment activities.

Short supplies and volatility in the costs of fuel, energy and raw materials may adversely affect our materials and construction businesses.

Our materials and construction businesses require a continued supply of diesel fuel, electricity and other energy sources for production and
transportation. The financial results of these businesses have at times been affected by the high costs of these energy sources. Significant increases
in costs, or reduced availability of these energy sources, have and may in the future reduce financial results. Moreover, fluctuations in the supply
and costs of these energy sources can make planning business operations more difficult. We do not hedge our fuel price risk, but instead focus on
volume-related price reductions, fuel efficiency, alternative fuel sources, consumption and the natural hedge created by the ability to increase
aggregates prices.

Similarly, segment operations also require a continued supply of liquid asphalt, which serves as a key raw material in the production of
asphaltic concrete. Liquid asphalt is subject to potential supply constraints and significant price fluctuations, which are generally correlated to the
price of crude oil, though not as closely as diesel or gasoline, and are beyond the control of our materials and construction businesses. Accordingly,
significant increases in the price of crude oil will have an adverse impact on the financial results of the Materials & Construction segment due to
higher costs of production of asphaltic concrete. Conversely, significant declines in the price of oil had, and in the future may have, an adverse
impact on our material and construction sales of liquid asphalt concrete, due to lower costs of importing asphalt to Hawai‘i, which may result in
customers sourcing liquid asphalt from competition located outside of Hawai‘i.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information set forth under the "Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies" section in Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 of this report, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

26

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ALEX. As of 43875, there were
approximately 2,035 shareholders of record. In addition, Cede & Co., which appears as a single record holder, represents the holdings of thousands
of beneficial owners of A&B stock.

The graph below compares the cumulative total return on the Company's common stock with that of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock
Index ("S&P 500") and two industry peer group indices, FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs and FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers, from December
31, 2014 through December 31, 2019. The stock price performance graph assumes that an investor invested $100 in each of A&B and the indices,
and the reinvestment of any dividends. The comparisons in the graph are provided in accordance with the SEC disclosure requirements and are not
intended to forecast or be indicative of the future performance of A&B's shares of common stock.

Trading volume averaged 304,596 shares a day in 2019, 353,100 shares a day in 2018, and 213,206 shares a day in 2017. A&B common
stock is included in the Russell 2000 Index, Russell 3000 Index, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.

27

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans at December 31, 2019, included:

Number of securities to be Weighted-average Number of securities remaining available for

issued upon exercise of exercise price of future issuance under equity compensation
outstanding options, warrants outstanding options, plans (excluding securities reflected in column
Plan Category and rights warrants and rights (a))
(a)1 (b)1 (c)2
Equity
compensation
plans approved by
security holders 352,200 $13.95 1,511,986

1
Number of securities reflects the antidilutive adjustments to outstanding stock option awards, including the number of stock options and the weighted average
price for such awards.
2
Under the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, 1,511,986 shares may be issued either as restricted stock grants, restricted stock unit grants, or stock option grants.

There were no unregistered equity securities sold by the Company during 2019.

There were no purchases of equity securities made by the Company during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.

28

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Year Ended December 31,

6
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2019 20186 2017 2016 2015
Operating Revenue:
Commercial Real Estate $ 160.6 $ 140.3 $ 136.9 $ 134.7 $ 133.6
Land Operations 114.1 289.5 84.5 61.9 120.2
Materials & Construction 160.5 214.6 204.1 190.9 219.0
Total operating revenue 435.2 644.4 425.5 387.5 472.8
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Commercial Real Estate 89.0 77.2 75.5 79.0 80.4
Cost of Land Operations 92.5 117.1 60.4 35.0 71.1
Cost of Materials & Construction 159.4 188.1 166.1 154.5 175.7
Selling, general and administrative 58.9 61.2 66.4 52.0 51.6
REIT evaluation/conversion costs1 — — 15.2 9.5 —
Impairment of assets 2 49.7 79.4 22.4 11.7 —
Total operating costs and expenses 449.5 523.0 406.0 341.7 378.8
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties — 51.4 9.3 8.1 (1.8)
Operating Income (Loss) (14.3) 172.8 28.8 53.9 92.2
Other Income and (Expenses):
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3 (4.1) 7.2 19.2 36.8
Impairment of equity method investments 3 — (188.6) — — —
Interest and other income (expense), net 3.2 2.3 (0.5) (11.5) (5.1)
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6) (26.3) (26.8)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income
Taxes (38.9) (52.9) 9.9 35.3 97.1
Income tax benefit (expense) 2.0 (16.3) 218.2 (2.6) (36.3)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (36.9) (69.2) 228.1 32.7 60.8
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes (1.5) (0.6) 2.4 (41.1) (29.7)
Net Income (Loss) (38.4) (69.8) 230.5 (8.4) 31.1
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0 (2.2) (2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $ (36.4) $ (72.0) $ 228.3 $ (10.2) $ 29.6

Capital expenditures4,5 $ 255.1 $ 296.1 $ 42.5 $ 119.6 $ 44.7

Depreciation and amortization 5 $ 50.5 $ 42.8 $ 41.4 $ 119.5 $ 55.7

Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.63 $ 0.66 $ 1.15
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.05 (0.84) (0.61)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.68 $ (0.18) $ 0.54
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.30 $ 0.65 $ 1.14

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.04 (0.83) (0.60)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.34 $ (0.18) $ 0.54

Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.69 $ — $ 4.48 $ 0.25 $ 0.21

29

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

December 31,
(in millions) 20196 20186 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated balance sheet data:
Total assets $ 2,084.3 $ 2,225.2 $ 2,231.2 $ 2,156.3 $ 2,242.3
Total liabilities $ 949.3 $ 1,009.0 $ 1,572.1 $ 932.3 $ 1,003.6
Notes payable and other debt $ 704.6 $ 778.1 $ 631.2 $ 515.1 $ 588.2
Redeemable noncontrolling interest $ 6.3 $ 7.9 $ 8.0 $ 10.8 $ 11.6
Total equity (includes noncontrolling interest) 7 $ 1,128.7 $ 1,208.3 $ 651.1 $ 1,213.2 $ 1,227.1
1
Costs related to the Company's in-depth evaluation of, and conversion to, a REIT.
2
During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges primarily related to the Materials & Construction segment. During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges related to three mainland commercial properties classified as held for sale at
December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges related to certain non-active, long-term development
projects in its Land Operations segment.
3
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to its investment in Kukui‘ula due to the Company changing its
strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of the project.
4
Excludes capital expenditures for real estate developments to be held and sold as real estate development inventory, which are classified in the consolidated statement of cash
flows as operating activities.
5
2016 and 2015 amounts include capital expenditures related to discontinued operations.
6
2019 and 2018 amounts are presented on a different basis from prior periods due to the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified
retrospective transition method.
7
2018 amounts are reflective of the early adoption of ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax
Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.

30

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
contemplated by the relevant forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding
possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, growth opportunities and competitive positions. Such forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date the statements were made and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially
from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item
1A of this Form 10-K under the heading "Risk Factors." The information in this Form 10-K should be evaluated in light of these important risk
factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

The risk factors discussed in "Risk Factors" could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking
statements. There may be other risks and uncertainties that we are unable to predict at this time or that we currently do not expect to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Any such risks could cause our results to differ materially from those
expressed in forward-looking statements.

INTRODUCTION

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") provides additional information
about the Company's business, recent developments, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, cash flows, results of operations and how
certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect our financial statements. MD&A is organized as follows:

• Business Overview: This section provides a general description of the Company's business, as well as recent developments that
management believes are important in understanding its results of operations and financial condition or in understanding anticipated future
trends.

• Critical Accounting Estimates: This section identifies and summarizes those accounting policies that significantly impact the Company's
reported results of operations and financial condition and require significant judgment or estimates on the part of management in their
application.

• Consolidated Results of Operations: This section provides an analysis of the Company's consolidated results of operations.

• Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment: This section provides an analysis of the Company's results of operations by
business segment.

• Liquidity and Capital Resources: This section provides a discussion of the Company's financial condition and an analysis of its cash flows,
as well as a discussion of the Company's ability to fund its future commitments and ongoing operating activities through internal and
external sources of capital.

• Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements: This section provides a discussion of the
Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments and contingencies that existed at December 31, 2019.

• Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk: This section discusses how the Company monitors and manages exposure to
potential gains and losses associated with changes in interest rates.

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018.
Discussions of 2017 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Amounts in the MD&A are rounded to the nearest tenth of a million. Accordingly, a recalculation of totals and percentages, if based on the
reported data, may be slightly different.

31

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

The Company operates three segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction. A description of each of
the Company's reporting segments is as follows:

• Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in
investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development
(i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house
leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-
day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its
portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and
industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored
neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience
and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing
venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing
real estate assets.

• Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following
activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse
legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally
derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business
activities.

• Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural
materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.

As a result of its conversion to a REIT and consequent de-emphasis of non-REIT operating businesses, the Company has established a
strategy to simplify its business, which includes ongoing efforts to accelerate the monetization of land and related assets and also includes
evaluating strategic options for the eventual monetization of some or all of its Materials & Construction businesses.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, upon which the MD&A is based, requires that
management exercise judgment when making estimates and assumptions about future events that may affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and actual results may differ from those
critical accounting estimates. These differences could be material.

Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i)(a) the accounting estimate requires the Company to make assumptions
about matters that were highly uncertain at the time that the accounting estimate was made, (b) changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to
occur in periods subsequent to the period in which the estimate was made, or (c) different estimates by the Company could have been used, and
(ii) changes in those assumptions or estimates would have had a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
The critical accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements are described below.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

Long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. In such an evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset are compared
with the amount recorded for the asset to determine if its carrying value is not recoverable. If this review determines that the recorded value will not
be recovered, the amount recorded for the asset is reduced to estimated fair value. These asset impairment analyses are highly subjective because
they require management to make assumptions and apply considerable judgments to, among other things, estimates of the timing and amount of
future cash flows, expected useful lives of the assets, uncertainty about future events, including changes in economic conditions, changes in
operating performance, changes in the use of the assets and ongoing costs of maintenance and improvements of the assets, and thus, the

32

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

accounting estimates may change from period to period. If management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods,
A&B’s financial condition or its future financial results could be materially impacted.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded cumulative long-lived asset and finite-lived intangible asset impairment
charges of $40.6 million related to its Materials and Construction segment.

In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of long-lived assets or finite-lived intangible
assets.

Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

The Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are reviewed for impairment whenever there is evidence that fair value may be
below carrying cost. An investment is written down to fair value if fair value is below carrying cost and the impairment is believed to be other-than-
temporary. In evaluating the fair value of an investment and whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, significant estimates and
considerable judgments are involved. These estimates and judgments are based, in part, on the Company’s current and future evaluation of
economic conditions in general, as well as a joint venture’s current and future plans. Additionally, these impairment calculations are highly
subjective because they require management to make assumptions and apply judgments to estimates regarding the timing and amount of future cash
flows that may consider various factors, including sales prices, development costs, market conditions and absorption rates, probabilities related to
various cash flow scenarios, and appropriate discount rates based on the perceived risks, among others. In evaluating whether an impairment is
other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available information, including but not limited to the financial condition and near-term prospects
of the affiliate, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
market value, and projected industry and economic trends, among others. Changes in these and other assumptions could affect the projected
operational results and fair value of the unconsolidated affiliates, and accordingly, may require valuation adjustments to the Company’s investments
that may materially impact the Company’s financial condition or its future operating results.

Economic conditions in particular real estate markets, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing or development
approvals, and changes in the Company’s development strategy, among other factors, may affect the value or feasibility of certain development
projects owned by the Company or by its joint ventures and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company determined that its investment in Kukui‘ula was other-than-temporarily impaired due to
the Company changing its strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of the project. As a result, the Company
estimated the fair value of its investment in Kukui‘ula using a discounted cash flow model and recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary
impairment of $186.8 million.

In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of investments in affiliates.

Goodwill

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. The goodwill
impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an income approach that is based on a discounted
cash flow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples. Valuations performed in conjunction with the
Company's goodwill impairment tests for each reporting unit assumes that each is an unrelated business to be sold separately and independently
from the other reporting units.

The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions, market factors specific
to the reporting unit, the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the business over an extended period of time and a
discount rate that considers the risks related to the amount and timing of the cash flows, among others. Under the market multiple methodology, the
estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When
using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and
proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for similar companies.

If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge
is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit.

33

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The Company's goodwill is attributable to (1) the three reporting units in the M&C segment - GPC (primarily consisting of the Grace
Pacific's quarry, paving, and liquid asphalt operations), GPRS (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific's roadway and maintenance solutions
operations) and GPRM (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific's prestressed and precast concrete operations) - recognized in the acquisition of Grace
Pacific in 2013 and (2) the CRE reporting unit, which is also the reportable segment.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with the Company's annual
goodwill impairment test in 2018, the carrying amounts of the GPC and GPRS reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was
determined to be impaired. The decline in fair value was due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that negatively affected sales and
margins. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $37.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2018. The weighted-
average discount rate used in the valuation was 13.6%. The GPRM reporting unit goodwill was not deemed to be impaired as GPRM's carrying
amount exceeded its fair value by approximately 33 percent.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the Company was required to perform an interim impairment test for the goodwill in each of
its three M&C reporting units due to the continued decline in M&C sales and margins in 2019, which resulted from continued, adverse market
conditions. Based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with this test, the carrying amounts of the three M&C reporting units
exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $49.7 million during the third quarter of 2019. The weighted-average discount rate used in the discounted cash flow approach of the valuation
was 12.7%.

Other than those noted above, the Company did not record any additional impairments to the goodwill in its reporting units during the year
ended December 31, 2019. Subsequent to such impairments, as of December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any material goodwill at any of
its reporting units that were at risk (see Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements).

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a full description of the impact of recently issued accounting standards, which is
incorporated herein by reference, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on the Company's results of operations and
financial condition.

34

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.

Net income (loss) attributable to A&B shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017

(in millions, except per share amounts) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Operating revenue $ 435.2 $ 644.4 $ 425.5 (209.2) (32.5)% 218.9 51.4 %
Cost of operations (340.9) (382.4) (302.0) 41.5 10.9 % (80.4) (26.6)%
Selling, general and administrative (58.9) (61.2) (66.4) 2.3 3.8 % 5.2 7.8 %
REIT evaluation/conversion costs — — (15.2) — —% 15.2 100.0 %
Impairment of assets (49.7) (79.4) (22.4) 29.7 37.4 % (57.0) 3X
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real
estate properties — 51.4 9.3 (51.4) (100.0)% 42.1 5X
Operating income (loss) (14.3) 172.8 28.8 (187.1) NM 144.0 5X
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3 (4.1) 7.2 9.4 NM (11.3) NM
Impairment of equity method investment — (188.6) — 188.6 100.0 % (188.6) —%
Interest and other income (expense), net 3.2 2.3 (0.5) 0.9 39.1 % 2.8 NM
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6) 2.2 6.2 % (9.7) (37.9)%
Income tax benefit (expense) 2.0 (16.3) 218.2 18.3 NM (234.5) NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations (36.9) (69.2) 228.1 32.3 46.7 % (297.3) NM
Discontinued operations (net of income
taxes) (1.5) (0.6) 2.4 (0.9) (150.0)% (3.0) NM
Net income (loss) (38.4) (69.8) 230.5 31.4 45.0 % (300.3) NM
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest 2.0 (2.2) (2.2) 4.2 NM — —%
Net income (loss) attributable to A&B $ (36.4) $ (72.0) $ 228.3 35.6 49.4 % (300.3) NM

Earnings (loss) per share available to A&B

shareholders
Basic - Continuing operations $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.63 (0.52) (51.5)% 5.64 NM
Basic - Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.01) 0.05 0.01 100.0 % 0.06 NM
$ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.68 (0.51) (50.0)% 5.70 NM

Diluted - Continuing operations $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.30 (0.52) (51.5)% 5.31 NM

Diluted - Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.01) 0.04 0.01 100.0 % 0.05 NM
$ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.34 (0.51) (50.0)% 5.36 NM

Weighted-average number of shares

outstanding
Basic 72.2 70.6 49.2
Diluted 72.2 70.6 53.0

Operating revenue for 2019 decreased 32.5%, or $209.2 million, to $435.2 million due primarily to the impact of the bulk sale of Maui
agricultural land in December 2018 that did not reoccur in 2019 (further described in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements).
Consolidated cost of operations for 2019 decreased 10.9%, or $41.5 million, to $340.9 million, due primarily to decreases in costs incurred by the
Materials & Construction and Land Operations segments. The reasons for business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations in operating
revenue and cost of operations as they pertain to fluctuations in segment operating profit are further described in the Analysis of Operating Revenue

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

and Profit by Segment.

Selling, general and administrative for 2019 decreased 3.8%, or $2.3 million, to $58.9 million due primarily to lower management
consulting expenses and lower personnel-related costs incurred in the current year as compared to 2018.

During the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment to goodwill in its Materials & Construction segment of $49.7
million due to the continued decline in sales and margins resulting from adverse market conditions. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company
recorded impairments of $79.4 million related to goodwill and long-lived assets for the quarry & paving operations in its Materials & Construction
segment. The reasons for business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations are further described in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and
Profit by Segment.

35

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Gain (loss) on sale of commercial real estate properties was zero in 2019 and $51.4 million in 2018. Activity in 2018 related to the sales of
nine improved properties and a ground lease that occurred in 2018.

Income (loss) related to joint ventures was $5.3 million of income in 2019 compared to a loss of $4.1 million for 2018, primarily due to
joint venture activity in the Land Operations segment. The reasons for business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations are further described
in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Impairment of equity method investments was zero in 2019 and $188.6 million in 2018. Activity in 2018 was related to impairments
recognized in the Land Operations segment. The reasons for business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations are further described in the
Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Income tax (expense) benefit for 2019 was a benefit of $2.0 million compared to an expense of $16.3 million for 2018. Activity in 2018
was primarily driven by the establishment of a valuation allowance related to the Company's deferred tax assets on the balance sheet due to
cumulative losses incurred in the Company's non-REIT operating businesses.

ANALYSIS OF OPERATING REVENUE AND PROFIT BY SEGMENT

The following analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.

Commercial Real Estate

Financial Results

Operating profit (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017

(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue $ 160.6 $ 140.3 $ 136.9 20.3 14.5 % 3.4 2.5 %
Commercial Real Estate operating costs and
expenses (89.0) (77.2) (75.5) (11.8) (15.3)% (1.7) (2.3)%
Selling, general and administrative (10.1) (6.9) (6.8) (3.2) (46.4)% (0.1) (1.5)%
Intersegment operating revenues1 2.7 2.6 2.5 0.1 3.8 % 0.1 4.0 %
Impairment of assets — — (22.4) — —% 22.4 100.0 %
Interest and other income (expense), net 2.0 (0.3) (0.3) 2.3 NM — —%
Commercial Real Estate operating profit
(loss) $ 66.2 $ 58.5 $ 34.4 7.7 13.2 % 24.1 70.1 %
Operating profit (loss) margin 41.2% 41.7% 25.1%

Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI")2

Hawai‘i $ 104.2 $ 84.7 $ 73.8 19.5 23.0 % 10.9 14.8 %
Mainland — 1.5 10.8 (1.5) (100.0)% (9.3) (86.1)%
Total Cash NOI $ 104.2 $ 86.2 $ 84.6 18.0 20.9 % 1.6 1.9 %

Same-Store Cash Net Operating Income

("Same-Store Cash NOI")2 $ 78.5 $ 74.6 $ 71.5 3.9 5.2 % 3.1 4.3 %
Gross Leasable Area ("GLA") (million sq.
ft.) - Improved (end of period)
Hawai‘i 3.9 3.5 3.0 0.4 11.4 % 0.5 16.7 %
Mainland — — 1.0 — —% (1.0) (100.0)%
Total Improved 3.9 3.5 4.0 0.4 11.4 % (0.5) (12.5)%
Ground leases (acres at end of period) 153.8 108.7 117.0 45.1 41.5 % (8.3) (7.1)%
1
Intersegment operating revenue, net for Commercial Real Estate is primarily from the Materials & Construction segment and is eliminated in the consolidated results of
operations.
2
Refer to page 38 for a discussion of management's use of a non-GAAP financial measure and the required reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Commercial Real Estate operating revenue increased 14.5%, or $20.3 million, to $160.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as
compared to 2018. Commercial Real Estate operating profit increased 13.2%, or $7.7 million, to $66.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2019, as compared to 2018. The increase in operating revenue and operating profit from the prior year is primarily driven by the impact of acquired
properties, redevelopment/new development projects commencing operations and new tenant leases, as well as an increase in Same-Store rents.

36

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

• Acquired Properties - Acquired properties contributing to a net increase in operating profit in the year ended December 31, 2019, as
compared to 2018, include:

i. Current year acquisitions of ground lease interests in the land under the Home Depot warehouse store in the Iwilei submarket of
Honolulu in March 2019 and land in Kapolei Business Park West, commonly known as the Honolulu Authority of Rapid
Transportation (HART) precast yard, in April 2019. These ground leases contributed $3.1 million of additional gross margin in
2019 as compared to 2018.

ii. Current/prior year industrial acquisitions of three Class-A warehouse buildings in Kapolei on Oahu in April 2019/December
2018. These industrial properties contributed $2.2 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.

iii. Current year retail portfolio acquisitions of Queens' MarketPlace on Hawai‘i (island) in May 2019 and Waipouli Town Center on
Kauai in May 2019, as well as the continued stabilization of February 2018 acquisitions of three retail centers in Hawai‘i
(Pu‘unene Shopping Center, Laulani Village Shopping Center and Hokulei Village Shopping Center). These retail properties
contributed $1.4 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.

• Redevelopment/New Development - Redevelopment/new development projects impacting current year operating profit due to the
commencement of operations include Lau Hala Shops in Kailua on Oahu (commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2018) and
Ho‘okele Shopping Center on Maui (commenced operations in the third quarter of 2019). These retail properties contributed
approximately $1.7 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.

• Same-Store Rent - Growth in Same-Store rents in the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily driven by Pearl
Highlands Center and Kailua Retail on Oahu resulting from higher occupancy and strong comparable leasing spreads, respectively. These
two properties contributed approximately $1.8 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.

The increase in operating revenue and gross margin from these drivers was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization related
to the acquired properties, as well as higher general and administrative expense related to growth in the overall segment portfolio driven, in part, by
an increase in personnel-related costs in the segment operations related to such growth.

Commercial Real Estate Portfolio Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company's acquisitions of improved properties were as follows ($ in millions):

Acquisitions
Property Location Date Purchase Price GLA (SF)
Kapolei Enterprise Center Oahu, HI 4/19 $ 26.8 93,000
Waipouli Town Center Kauai, HI 5/19 17.8 56,600
Queens' MarketPlace Hawai‘i (island), HI 5/19 90.3 134,700
Total $ 134.9 284,300

In addition, the Company made acquisitions of ground lease interests in land during the year ended December 31, 2019 as follows ($ in
millions):

Acquisitions
Property Location Date Purchase Price Acres
Home Depot Iwilei Oahu, HI 3/19 $ 42.4 9.0
Kapolei Business Park West Oahu, HI 4/19 41.1 36.4
Total $ 83.5 45.4

There were no dispositions of CRE improved properties or ground lease interests during the year ended December 31, 2019.

37

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Leasing Activity

In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company signed 91 new leases and 123 renewal leases, covering 565.4 thousand square feet of
GLA. The 91 new leases comprise 272.6 thousand square feet with an average annual base rent of $25.21 per square foot. Signed new leases
resulted in an 11.4% average base rent increase over comparable expiring leases. The 123 renewal leases comprise 292.8 thousand square feet with
an average annual base rent of $28.57 per square foot. Signed renewal leases resulted in a 7.4% average base rent increase over comparable expiring
leases.

Leasing activity summarized by property type for the year ended December 31, 2019 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2019

Leases GLA ABR/SF Rent Spread
Retail 113 239,887 41.02 8.8%
Industrial 83 285,719 14.95 7.0%
Office 18 39,841 28.32 5.3%

Occupancy

Occupancy represents the percentage of square footage leased and commenced to gross leasable space at the end of the period reported.
The Company's commercial real estate portfolio's occupancy and Same-Store occupancy percentage summarized by property type as of December
31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows:

Occupancy
As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Percentage Point Change
Retail 93.3% 93.4% (0.1)
Industrial 95.3% 90.1% 5.2
Office 90.9% 93.8% (2.9)
Total 93.9% 92.4% 1.5

Same-Store Occupancy
As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Percentage Point Change
Retail 94.4% 93.3% 1.1
Industrial 94.1% 90.1% 4.0
Office 90.9% 93.8% (2.9)
Total 94.1% 92.2% 1.9

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company uses non-GAAP measures when evaluating operating performance because management believes that they provide
additional insight into the Company's and segments' core operating results, and/or the underlying business trends affecting performance on a
consistent and comparable basis from period to period. These measures generally are provided to investors as an additional means of evaluating the
performance of ongoing core operations.

Cash NOI is a non-GAAP measure used internally in evaluating the unlevered performance of the Company's Commercial Real Estate
portfolio. The Company believes Cash NOI provides useful information to investors regarding the Company's financial condition and results of
operations because it reflects only those cash income and expense items that are incurred at the property level, and when compared across periods,
can be used to determine trends in earnings of the Company's properties as this measure is not affected by non-cash revenue and expense
recognition items, the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses or other gains or losses that relate to the Company's ownership of
properties. The Company believes the exclusion of these items from operating profit (loss) is useful because the resulting measure captures the
actual cash-based revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating the Company's Commercial Real Estate portfolio as well as trends in
occupancy rates, rental rates, and operating costs. Cash NOI should not be viewed as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in
accordance with GAAP.

Cash NOI represents total Commercial Real Estate cash-based operating revenues, less direct property-related operating expenses. The
calculation of Cash NOI excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization (including amortization of maintenance capital, tenant improvements

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

and leasing commissions); straight-line lease adjustments (including amortization of lease incentives);

38

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

amortization of favorable/unfavorable lease assets/liabilities; lease termination income; other income and expense, net; selling, general,
administrative and other expenses; and impairment of commercial real estate assets.

The Company reports Cash NOI and Occupancy on a Same-Store basis, which includes the results of properties that were owned and
operated for the entirety of the current and prior calendar year. The Same-Store pool excludes properties under development or redevelopment and
also excludes properties acquired or sold during either of the comparable reporting periods. While there is management judgment involved in
classifications, new developments and redevelopments are moved into the Same-Store pool after one full calendar year of stabilized operation. New
developments and redevelopments are generally considered stabilized upon the initial attainment of 90% occupancy. Properties included in held for
sale are excluded from Same-Store.

The Company believes that reporting on a Same-Store basis provides investors with additional information regarding the operating
performance of comparable assets versus from other factors (such as the effect of developments, redevelopments, acquisitions or dispositions).

The Company's methods of calculating non-GAAP measures may differ from methods employed by other companies and thus may not be
comparable to such other companies.

A reconciliation of Commercial Real Estate operating profit (loss) to Commercial Real Estate Cash NOI for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):

(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017

Commercial Real Estate Operating Profit (Loss) $ 66.2 $ 58.5 $ 34.4
Plus: Depreciation and amortization 36.7 28.0 26.0
Less: Straight-line lease adjustments (5.1) (4.0) (1.6)
Less: Favorable/(unfavorable) lease amortization (1.6) (1.9) (2.9)
Less: Termination income (0.1) (1.1) (1.7)
Plus: Other (income)/expense, net (2.0) 0.3 0.3
Plus: Impairment of assets — — 22.4
Plus: Selling, general, administrative and other expenses 10.1 6.9 7.9
Less: Legal costs previously capitalized 1 — (0.5) (0.2)
Cash NOI as adjusted 104.2 86.2 84.6
Less Cash NOI from acquisitions, dispositions, and other adjustments (25.7) (11.6) (13.1)
Same-Store Cash NOI as adjusted 78.5 74.6 71.5
1
Represents legal costs related to leasing activity that were previously capitalized when incurred and recognized as amortization expense over the term of the lease
contract. Upon the Company's adoption of ASC 842, Leases, on January 1, 2019, such legal costs are directly expensed as operating costs and are included in Cash
NOI. For comparability purposes, Cash NOI for the prior periods presented has been adjusted to include legal fees in conformity with Cash NOI for 2019.

Land Operations

The asset class mix of real estate sales in any given period can be diverse and may include developed residential real estate, developable
subdivision lots, undeveloped land or property sold under threat of condemnation. Further, the timing of property or parcel sales can significantly
affect operating results in a given period.

Additionally, the operating profit reported in each period does not necessarily follow a percentage of sales trend because the cost basis of
property sold can differ significantly between transactions. For example, the sale of undeveloped land and vacant parcels in Hawai‘i generally
provides higher margins than does the sale of developed property, due to the low historical cost basis of the Company's land owned in Hawai‘i.

As a result, direct year-over-year comparison of the Land Operations segment results may not provide a consistent, measurable indicator of
future performance. Further, Land Operations revenue trends, cash flows from the sales of real estate, and the amount of real estate held for sale on
the Company's balance sheet do not necessarily indicate future profitability trends for this segment.

39

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Land Operations operating profit (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017

Development sales revenue $ 57.2 $ 54.3 $ 35.0
Unimproved/other property sales revenue 32.4 210.5 25.6
Other operating revenues 1 24.5 24.7 23.9
Total Land Operations operating revenue 114.1 289.5 84.5
Land operations costs and operating expenses (97.9) (124.0) (73.9)
Impairment of assets — (1.6) —
Impairment of equity method investment — (188.6) —
Earnings (loss) from joint ventures 3.9 (4.7) 3.3
Interest and other income (expense), net 0.7 2.7 0.3
Total Land Operations operating profit (loss) $ 20.8 $ (26.7) $ 14.2
1
Other operating revenues includes revenue related to trucking, renewable energy and diversified agriculture.

2019: Land Operations revenue of $114.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was driven by development sales activity which
included three of the remaining Kahala Avenue acres; 44 of the remaining units for the Company's Kamalani project in Kihei, Maui; nine acres at
Maui Business Park (Phase II); unimproved/other property sales activity related to the sale of land and related property and rights in Wailea, Maui;
and the sale of unimproved property of approximately 800 acres of agricultural land on Maui.

2018: Land Operations revenue of $289.5 million was significantly impacted by the bulk sale of Maui agricultural land in December 2018
(further described in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements). Land Operations revenue also included sales of 91 units for the Company's
Kamalani project in Kihei, Maui, the sale of one Kahala Avenue parcel, the sale of 313 acres to the State of Hawai‘i for the expansion of the
Kahului airport on Maui, the sale of 262 acres to the County of Maui for the expansion of the Kula Agricultural Park on Maui, and trucking service
and power sales revenues.

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $26.7 million and included the gross profit of $162.2 million related to the
Agricultural Land Sale, the sale of a 313 acre land parcel in Kahului, Maui, and a decrease in earnings from the Company's real estate development-
related joint ventures and investments. The segment results also included equity method investment impairments of $188.6 million, primarily
related to the Company's Kukui‘ula joint venture. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company changed its strategy and will no longer hold its
investment in Kukui‘ula long-term, although it remains committed to positioning the project for longer term success and transition. As a result of
the change in intent, the Company concluded that the carrying value of its investment in Kukui‘ula was not recoverable and recognized a non-cash
impairment of $186.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2018. Operating profit also includes interest and other income (expense), net, of $3.2
million, primarily related to a gain on the sale of a real estate development joint venture.

40

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Materials & Construction

Selected financial data for Materials & Construction for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017

(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Materials & Construction operating
revenue $ 160.5 $ 214.6 $ 204.1 $ (54.1) (25.2)% $ 10.5 5.1 %
Materials & Construction operating
profit (loss) $ (69.2) $ (73.2) $ 22.0 $ 4.0 5.5 % $ (95.2) NM
Depreciation and amortization $ 11.4 $ 12.1 $ 12.2 $ 0.7 5.8 % $ 0.1 0.8 %
Aggregate tons delivered (tons in
thousands) 786.9 718.2 691.6 68.7 9.6 % 26.6 3.8 %
Asphalt tons delivered (tons in
thousands) 293.8 498.2 553.8 (204.4) (41.0)% (55.6) (10.0)%
Backlog at period end 1 $ 79.5 $ 128.7 $ 202.1 $ (49.2) (38.2)% $ (73.4) (36.3)%
1
Backlog represents the total amount of revenue that Grace Pacific and Maui Paving, LLC, a 50-percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate, expect to realize on contracts
awarded. Backlog primarily consists of asphalt paving and, to a lesser extent, Grace Pacific’s consolidated revenue from its prestress and construction-and traffic control-
related products. Backlog includes estimated revenue from the remaining portion of contracts not yet completed, as well as revenue from approved change orders. The length
of time that projects remain in backlog can span from a few days for a small volume of work to 36 months for large paving contracts and contracts performed in phases. As of
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, these amounts include $14.3 million, $10.7 million and $17.2 million, respectively, of opportunity backlog consisting of government
contracts in which Grace Pacific has been confirmed to be the lowest bidder and formal communication of the award is deemed perfunctory at the time of this disclosure.
Circumstances outside the Company's control such as procurement or technical protests may arise that prevent the finalization of such contracts. Maui Paving's backlog as of
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $4.4 million, $4.1 million and $10.6 million, respectively.

Materials & Construction revenue was $160.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $214.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018. Operating loss was $69.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $73.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2018. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment to goodwill of $49.7 million due to the continued
decline in sales and margins resulting from a deterioration in market conditions related to government agency bid opportunities. During 2018, the
Company recorded impairments of $77.8 million related to long-lived assets for the quarry & paving operations and goodwill due primarily to
persisting, competitive market pressures. Earnings from joint venture investments are not included in segment revenue but are included in operating
loss.

The reduction in backlog from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 is due primarily to an overall decrease in bidding opportunities
presented by government agencies together with the completion of contract work during 2019. Additionally, backlog reflects a change in the
manner in which local government agencies contract paving services (reducing the amount of paving work that meets the definition of backlog).
Certain agencies now award "maintenance contracts" under which a contractor can secure all paving work within a certain geographic area, but jobs
are not identified in advance (and, therefore, will not meet the requirement for inclusion in backlog).

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview: The Company's primary liquidity needs have historically been to support working capital requirements and fund capital
expenditures, commercial real estate acquisitions and real estate developments. A&B's principal sources of liquidity have been cash flows provided
by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalent balances, and borrowing capacity under its various credit facilities.

The Company's operating income (loss) is generated by its subsidiaries. There are no material restrictions on the ability of the Company's
wholly owned subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company. The Company regularly evaluates investment
opportunities, including development projects, commercial real estate acquisitions, joint venture investments, share repurchases, business
acquisitions and other strategic transactions to increase shareholder value. The Company cannot predict whether or when it may make investments
or what impact any such transactions could have on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. The Company’s cash
flows from operations, borrowing availability and overall liquidity are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those described in "Risk
Factors."

Cash Flows: Net cash flows provided by operations was $157.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to
cash generated from the Company's CRE segment and Land Operations segment through leasing activities and real estate development sales,
respectively, as well as tax-related cash receipts of $24.6 million (primarily related to Federal Income Tax receivables). Cash flows provided by
operations was $309.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily attributable to the bulk sale of 41,000 acres of agricultural lands and
certain ownership interests, leasing activities and real estate development sales.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

41

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Net cash flows used in investing activities was $240.4 million and $104.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the cash used in investing activities were primarily comprised of $255.1 million in capital
expenditures, including $218.4 million related to the Company's acquisitions of five commercial real estate assets. Cash used in investing activities
also included $3.3 million related to payments for purchases of investments in affiliates and other investments. Cash inflows from investing
activities during the year ended December 31, 2019 included $13.6 million related to distributions from joint ventures and other returns of
investments and $4.4 million of proceeds related to the disposal of property, investments and other assets.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the net cash used in investing activities included cash outlays of $296.1 million related to
capital expenditures, including cash outlays of $288.7 million for the Company's acquisitions of Laulani Village Shopping Center, Hokulei Village
Shopping Center, Pu‘unene Shopping Center, five commercial units at The Collection high-rise residential condominium project, and two Class A
industrial warehouse buildings on Oahu. Cash outlays for investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 also included contributions
of $22.6 million related to investments in unconsolidated affiliates. Cash inflows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018
included proceeds of $171.7 million resulting from the sales of nine improved properties and a ground lease. Other investing cash flow activity
during the year ended December 31, 2018 included $42.3 million of proceeds from joint ventures and other investments.

Net cash flows used in investing activities for capital expenditures were as follows:

(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 Change

Commercial real estate property acquisitions/improvements $ 246.9 $ 274.0 (9.9)%
Tenant improvements
3.6 8.7 (58.6)%
Quarrying and paving 1.9 11.0 (82.7)%
Agribusiness and other 2.7 2.4 12.5%
Total capital expenditures¹ $ 255.1 $ 296.1 (13.8)%
1 Excludes capital expenditures for real estate developments to be held and sold as real estate development inventory, which are classified in the consolidated
statement of cash flows as operating activities and are excluded from the tables above.

In 2020, the Company expects that its capital expenditures will be approximately $45-$58 million. Of this amount, capital expenditures for
growth, maintenance and acquisition capital will be approximately $33-$41 million for the Commercial Real Estate segment. An additional $10-$13
million has been projected for Materials & Construction and the remaining $2-$4 million has been projected for Land Operations/general corporate
purposes. Should investment opportunities in excess of the amounts budgeted arise, the Company believes it has adequate sources of liquidity to
fund these investments.

Net cash flows used in financing activities was $136.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to net cash used in
financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 of $73.5 million. The change in cash flows used in financing activities in 2019 as
compared to 2018 was due primarily to making net payments on debt (i.e., debt payments net of additional borrowings) as compared to net
borrowings in the prior period, partially offset by lower cash dividend payments in 2019 as compared to 2018 due to the cash dividend payment of
$156.6 million in January 2018 related to the Company's conversion to a REIT.

The Company believes that funds generated from results of operations, available cash and cash equivalents, and available borrowings
under credit facilities will be sufficient to finance the Company's business requirements for the next year, including working capital, capital
expenditures, potential acquisitions, notes payable and other debt due in the next twelve months and stock repurchases. There can be no assurance,
however, that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that it will be able to maintain its ability to borrow
under its available credit facilities.

Other Sources of Liquidity: Additional sources of liquidity for the Company consisted of trade receivables, contracts retention and other
miscellaneous liquid assets (e.g., income tax receivables, inventories ready to be sold) totaling $73.1 million at December 31, 2019, a decrease of
$38.4 million from December 31, 2018.

The Company also has revolving credit and term facilities that provide additional sources of liquidity for working capital requirements or
investment opportunities on a short-term as well as longer-term basis. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $98.7 million of revolving credit
borrowings outstanding, $1.7 million in letters of credit had been issued against the facility, and $349.6 million remained unused.

42

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exchanges:

Sales: During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company generated approximately $6.7 million of cash proceeds that qualified for
potential tax-deferral treatment under §1031 of the Code in connection with the sale of land parcels on Maui.

Purchases: During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company utilized $219.0 million of funds from tax-deferred sales or
condemnations.

Proceeds from tax-deferred sales under §1031 of the Code are held in escrow pending future use to purchase new real estate assets. The
proceeds from condemnations under §1033 of the Code are held by the Company until the funds are redeployed. During the year ended December
31, 2019, $11.0 million of funds from tax-deferred sales or condemnations expired without being reinvested. As of December 31, 2019, there were
no cash proceeds from tax-deferred sales and approximately $14.5 million from tax-deferred condemnations that had not yet been reinvested.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Contractual Obligations: As of December 31, 2019, the Company had the following estimated contractual obligations (in millions):

(in millions, unaudited) Payment due by period

Contractual Obligations Total 2020 2021-2022 2023-2024 Thereafter
Debt obligations (1) $ 705.2 $ 30.9 $ 171.8 $ 241.3 $ 261.2
Estimated interest on debt (2) 150.3 30.3 55.8 33.5 30.7
Purchase obligations (3) 12.8 12.8 — — —
Pension benefits 124.9 13.1 26.0 25.4 60.4
Post-retirement obligations (4) 6.1 0.8 1.4 1.2 2.7
Non-qualified benefit obligations (5) 3.0 — 1.2 — 1.8
Operating lease obligations (6) 28.4 4.6 9.0 5.9 8.9
Total $ 1,030.7 $ 92.5 $ 265.2 $ 307.3 $ 365.7

(1) Debt obligations (excluding debt premium or discount) include principal repayments of debt for the respective period(s) described (see Note 8 to
the consolidated financial statements for debt maturities for each of the next five years). Debt includes amounts borrowed under revolving credit
facilities, which have been reflected as payments due in 2022. This amount does not include the debt issuance cost.
(2) Estimated cash paid for interest on debt is determined based on (1) the stated interest rate for fixed debt and (2) the rate in effect as of
December 31, 2019 for variable rate debt. Because the Company’s variable rate debt may be rolled over, actual interest may be greater or less than
the amounts indicated. Estimated interest on debt also includes swap payments on the Company's interest rate swaps.
(3) Purchase obligations include only non-cancelable contractual obligations for the purchases of goods and services. Arrangements are considered
purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure and
approximate timing of the transaction. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are
excluded from the table above.
(4) Post-retirement obligations include expected payments to medical service providers in connection with providing benefits to the Company’s
employees and retirees. The $2.7 million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2025 through 2029.
Post-retirement obligations are described further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(5) Non-qualified benefit obligations include estimated payments to executives and directors under the Company’s non-qualified plans. The $1.8
million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2025 through 2029. Additional information about the
Company’s non-qualified plans is included in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(6) Operating lease obligations primarily include land, office space and equipment under non-cancelable, long-term lease arrangements that do not
transfer the rights and risks of ownership to the Company. Such obligations are recognized as lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets
based on the present value of such payments over the lease term and are further described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.

Commitments, Contingencies and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements: A description of other commitments, contingencies, and off-
balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2019, and herein incorporated by reference, is included in Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements of Item 8 in this Form 10-K.

43

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates, primarily as a result of its borrowing and investing activities used to maintain
liquidity and to fund business operations. In order to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company utilizes a balanced mix of debt
maturities, along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The nature and amount of the Company’s long-term and short-term debt can be
expected to fluctuate as a result of future business requirements, market conditions, and other factors.

The Company’s fixed rate debt, excluding debt premium or discount and debt issuance costs, consists of $556.5 million in principal term
notes. The Company’s variable rate debt consists of $98.7 million under its revolving credit facilities and $50.0 million under a bank syndicated
loan. Other than in default, the Company does not have an obligation, nor the option in some cases, to prepay its fixed-rate debt prior to maturity
and, as a result, interest rate fluctuations and the resulting changes in fair value would not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or
results of operations unless the Company was required to refinance such debt. For the Company’s variable rate debt, a one percent increase in
interest rates would have approximately a $1.5 million impact on the Company's results of operations for 2019, assuming the December 31,
2019 balance of the variable rate debt was outstanding throughout 2019.

The following table summarizes the Company’s debt obligations at December 31, 2019, presenting principal cash flows and related
interest rates by the expected fiscal year of repayment.

Fair Value at
Expected Fiscal Year of Repayment at December 31, 2019 December 31,
(dollars in millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total 2019
Liabilities
Fixed rate $ 30.9 $ 43.3 $ 29.9 $ 34.3 $ 156.8 $ 261.3 $ 556.5 $ 578.6
Average interest rate 4.40% 4.34% 4.24% 4.19% 3.41% 3.77% 4.05%
Variable rate $ — $ — $ 98.7 $ 50.0 $ — $ — $ 148.7 $ 148.7
Average interest rate 1 4.31% 4.31% 4.31% 3.51% —% —% 4.23%
1
Estimated interest rates on variable rate debt are determined based on the rate in effect on December 31, 2019. Actual interest rates may be greater or less than the amounts
indicated when variable rate debt is rolled over.

From time to time, the Company may invest its excess cash in short-term money market funds that purchase government securities or
corporate debt securities. At December 31, 2019, the amount invested in money market funds was immaterial. These money market funds maintain
a weighted average maturity of less than 60 days, and accordingly, a one percent change in interest rates is not expected to have a material impact
on the fair value of these investments or on interest income.

The Company has no material exposure to foreign currency risks.

44

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 46

Consolidated Balance Sheets 48
Consolidated Statements of Operation 49
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 50
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 51
Consolidated Statements of Equity 53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 54
1. Background and Basis of Presentation 54
2. Significant Accounting Policies 55
3. Related Party Transactions 65
4. Discontinued Operations 66
5. Investments in Affiliates 66
6. Revenue and Contract Balances 68
7. Real Estate Property, Net 69
8. Notes Payable and Other Debt 70
9. Leases – The Company as Lessee 73
10 Leases – The Company as Lessor 74
11. Employee Benefit Plans 75
12. Income Taxes 80
13. Share-Based Payment Awards 83
14. Commitments and Contingencies 85
15. Derivative Instruments 86
16. Earnings Per Share ("EPS") 87
17. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest 87
18. Cessation of Sugar Operations 88
19. Segment Results 88
20. Real Estate Acquisitions 90
21. Agricultural Land Sale 91
22. Goodwill 91
23. Subsequent Events 92
24. Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Information 93

45

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December
31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows, for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2020,
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and
(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way
our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate
opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Goodwill - Materials & Construction Segment (Fair Value of the Reporting Units) - Refer to Note 22 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. If the results of the Company's test
indicate that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the
carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

The goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an income approach that is based
on a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples. The discounted cash flow
approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions and market factors, primarily related to the amount and
timing of estimated future cash flows, and the selection of an

46

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

appropriate discount rate. Under the market multiple methodology, the estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make
judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for similar companies.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the carrying amounts of the Materials & Construction reporting units exceeded their estimated fair
values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $49.7 million.

Significant judgments were made by management to estimate the fair value of the Materials & Construction reporting units including assumptions
related to the forecasting of future cash flows, selection of discount rates, and selection of market multiples of EBITDA or revenues. Performing
audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of these assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgement and an increased extent of effort,
including the need to involve our fair value specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management’s forecasting of future cash flows, selection of discount rates, and selection of market multiples of
EBITDA or revenues for the Materials & Construction reporting units included the following, among others:
• We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s determination of fair value of the Materials & Construction reporting units,
including controls related to management’s forecasts and selection of discount rates and market multiples.
• We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast future cash flows by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
• We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future cash flows by comparing the forecasts to:
– Forecasted information included in Company press releases as well as external, independent analyst, economic and industry reports for
the Company and certain of its peer companies.
– Historical results.
– Actual performance subsequent to year end.
• With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the discount rates, including testing the underlying source information and the
mathematical accuracy of the calculations, and developing a range of independent estimates for discount rates and comparing those to the
discount rates selected by management.
• With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the multiples of EBITDA and revenue, including testing the underlying source
information and mathematical accuracy of the calculations, and comparing the multiples selected by management to those of similar
companies.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, Hawai‘i
February 27, 2020

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1950.

47

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)

December 31,
2019 2018
ASSETS
Real estate investments
Real estate property $ 1,540.2 $ 1,293.7
Accumulated depreciation (127.5) (107.2)
Real estate property, net 1,412.7 1,186.5
Real estate developments 79.1 155.2
Investments in real estate joint ventures and partnerships 133.4 141.0
Real estate intangible assets, net 74.9 59.8
Real estate investments, net 1,700.1 1,542.5
Cash and cash equivalents 15.2 11.4
Restricted cash 0.2 223.5
Accounts receivable, net 43.4 49.6
Contracts retention 8.6 11.6
Inventories 20.7 26.5
Other property, net 124.4 135.5
Operating lease right-of-use assets 21.8 —
Goodwill 15.4 65.1
Other receivables 27.4 56.8
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 10.0 9.2
Prepaid expenses and other assets 97.1 93.5
Total assets $ 2,084.3 $ 2,225.2

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Liabilities:
Notes payable and other debt $ 704.6 $ 778.1
Accounts payable 17.8 34.2
Operating lease liabilities 21.6 —
Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits 26.8 29.4
Indemnity holdbacks 7.5 16.3
Deferred revenue 67.6 63.2
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts 7.9 5.9
Accrued and other liabilities 95.5 81.9
Total liabilities 949.3 1,009.0
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest (Note 17) 6.3 7.9
Equity:
Common stock - no par value; authorized, 150 million shares; outstanding, 72.3 million and
72.0 million shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively 1,800.1 1,793.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (48.8) (51.9)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings (626.2) (538.9)
Total A&B shareholders' equity 1,125.1 1,202.6

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Noncontrolling interest 3.6 5.7

Total equity 1,128.7 1,208.3
Total liabilities and equity $ 2,084.3 $ 2,225.2

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

48

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)

Year Ended December 31,

2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenue:
Commercial Real Estate $ 160.6 $ 140.3 $ 136.9
Land Operations 114.1 289.5 84.5
Materials & Construction 160.5 214.6 204.1
Total operating revenue 435.2 644.4 425.5
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Commercial Real Estate 89.0 77.2 75.5
Cost of Land Operations 92.5 117.1 60.4
Cost of Materials & Construction 159.4 188.1 166.1
Selling, general and administrative 58.9 61.2 66.4
REIT evaluation/conversion costs — — 15.2
Impairment of assets 49.7 79.4 22.4
Total operating costs and expenses 449.5 523.0 406.0
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties — 51.4 9.3
Operating Income (Loss) (14.3) 172.8 28.8
Other Income and (Expenses):
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3 (4.1) 7.2
Impairment of equity method investment — (188.6) —
Interest and other income (expense), net (Note 2) 3.2 2.3 (0.5)
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes (38.9) (52.9) 9.9
Income tax benefit (expense) 2.0 (16.3) 218.2
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (36.9) (69.2) 228.1
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (Note 4) (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
Net Income (Loss) (38.4) (69.8) 230.5
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0 (2.2) (2.2)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $ (36.4) $ (72.0) $ 228.3

Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.63
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.05
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.68

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:

Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $ (0.49) $ (1.01) $ 4.30
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.04
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $ (0.51) $ (1.02) $ 4.34

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:

Basic 72.2 70.6 49.2
Diluted 72.2 70.6 53.0

Amounts Available to A&B Common Shareholders (Note 16):

Continuing operations available to A&B common shareholders $ (35.1) $ (71.4) $ 227.7
Discontinued operations available to A&B common shareholders (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
Net income (loss) available to A&B common shareholders $ (36.6) $ (72.0) $ 230.1

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

49

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In millions)

Year Ended December 31,

2019 2018 2017
Net Income (Loss) $ (38.4) $ (69.8) $ 230.5
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
Unrealized interest rate hedging gain (loss) (4.0) 1.0 (0.4)
Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest expense included in Net Income (Loss) (0.1) — 0.5
Defined benefit pension plans:
Actuarial gain (loss) 5.3 (4.9) (3.2)
Amortization of net loss included in net periodic benefit cost 4.0 4.6 4.3
Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic benefit cost (0.7) (0.7) (0.8)
Curtailment (gain)/loss (1.4) (0.6) (0.3)
Settlement (gain)/loss — 0.1 1.4
Income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) — — (0.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 3.1 (0.5) 0.9
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (35.3) (70.3) 231.4
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0 (2.2) (2.2)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $ (33.3) $ (72.5) $ 229.2

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

50

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)

Year Ended December 31,

2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $ (38.4) $ (69.8) $ 230.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operations:
Depreciation and amortization 50.5 42.8 41.4
Deferred income taxes — 16.6 (199.0)
Loss (gain) on asset transactions, net (2.6) (54.0) (35.1)
Impairment of assets and equity method investments 49.7 268.0 22.4
Share-based compensation expense 5.4 4.7 4.4
(Income) loss from affiliates, net of distributions of income (1.4) 12.9 5.5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade, contracts retention, and other contract receivables 8.5 (4.2) (2.4)
Inventories 5.7 5.5 11.4
Prepaid expenses, income tax receivable and other assets 28.5 (13.2) (23.0)
Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits 4.6 3.6 (47.4)
Accounts payable (12.9) (9.0) 3.3
Accrued and other liabilities 3.2 74.2 (40.1)
Real estate development for sale proceeds, net of margins recognized in net income (loss) 65.1 58.4 47.6
Expenditures for real estate development for sale (8.3) (26.6) (20.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) operations 157.6 309.9 (1.3)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Capital expenditures for acquisitions (218.4) (241.7) (10.1)
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment (36.7) (54.4) (32.4)
Proceeds from disposal of property, investments and other assets 4.4 171.7 47.2
Payments for purchases of investments in affiliates and other investments (3.3) (22.6) (41.9)
Distributions of capital from investments in affiliates and other investments 13.6 42.3 33.3
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (240.4) (104.7) (3.9)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and other debt 125.9 548.4 292.5
Payments of notes payable and other debt and deferred financing costs (203.9) (467.8) (181.0)
Borrowings (payments) on line-of-credit agreement, net (0.3) 4.7 2.6
Distribution to noncontrolling interests (0.3) (0.7) (0.5)
Cash dividends paid (50.0) (156.6) (10.3)
Proceeds from issuance (repurchase) of capital stock and other, net (1.0) (1.5) (7.2)
Payment of deferred acquisition holdback (7.1) — —
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (136.7) (73.5) 96.1

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (219.5) 131.7 90.9
Balance, beginning of period 234.9 103.2 12.3

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Balance, end of period $ 15.4 $ 234.9 $ 103.2

51

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Year Ended December 31,

2019 2018 2017
Other Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest $ (32.5) $ (34.4) $ (24.9)
Income tax (payments)/refunds, net $ 25.8 $ 2.6 $ (4.0)

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities $ 4.4 $ 1.4 $ 4.5
Fair value of loan assumed in connection with acquisition $ — $ 61.0 $ —
Uncollected proceeds from disposal of equipment $ — $ — $ 1.9
Real estate exchanged for note receivable $ — $ — $ 2.5
Right-of-use ("ROU") assets and corresponding lease liability recorded upon ASC 842
adoption $ 31.0 $ — $ —
Finance lease liabilities arising from obtaining ROU assets $ 3.4 $ — $ —
Issuance of shares for stock dividend $ — $ 626.4 $ —
Dividends declared $ — $ — $ 783.0

Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:

Beginning of the period:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 11.4 $ 68.9 $ 2.2
Restricted cash 223.5 34.3 10.1
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 234.9 $ 103.2 $ 12.3

End of the period:

Cash and cash equivalents $ 15.2 $ 11.4 $ 68.9
Restricted cash 0.2 223.5 34.3
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 15.4 $ 234.9 $ 103.2

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

52

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In millions, except per share amounts)

Total Equity
(Distribution
in Excess
Accumulated of Redeem-
Common Stock Other Accumulated able
Compre- Earnings) Non- Non-
Stated hensive Earnings Controlling Controlling
Shares Value Income (Loss) Surplus Interest Total Interest
Balance, January 1, 2017 49.0 $ 1,157.3 $ (43.2) $ 95.2 $ 3.9 $ 1,213.2 $ 10.8
Net income (loss) — — — 228.3 1.0 229.3 1.2
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax — — 0.9 — — 0.9 —
Dividend on common stock ($16.13
per share) — — — (793.3) — (793.3) —
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest — — — — (0.2) (0.2) (0.3)
Adjustments to redemption value of
redeemable noncontrolling interest
(Note 17) — — — 3.7 — 3.7 (3.7)
Share-based compensation — 4.4 — — — 4.4 —
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.3 — — (6.9) — (6.9) —
Balance, December 31, 2017 49.3 $ 1,161.7 $ (42.3) $ (473.0) $ 4.7 $ 651.1 $ 8.0

Net income (loss) — — — (72.0) 1.5 (70.5) 0.7

Impact of adoption of new
accounting standards — — (9.1) 7.7 — (1.4) —
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax — — (0.5) — — (0.5) —
Stock dividend ($11.65 per share) 22.6 626.4 — — — 626.4 —
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest — — — — (0.5) (0.5) (0.2)
Adjustments to redemption value of
redeemable noncontrolling interest
(Note 17) — 0.6 — — — 0.6 (0.6)
Share-based compensation — 4.7 — — — 4.7 —
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.1 — — (1.6) — (1.6) —
Balance, December 31, 2018 72.0 $ 1,793.4 $ (51.9) $ (538.9) $ 5.7 $ 1,208.3 $ 7.9

Net income (loss) — — — (36.4) (2.1) (38.5) 0.1

Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax — — 3.1 — — 3.1 —
Dividend on common stock ($0.69
per share) — — — (50.0) — (50.0) —
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest — — — — — — (0.3)
Adjustments to redemption value of
redeemable noncontrolling interest
(Note 17) — 1.4 — — — 1.4 (1.4)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Share-based compensation — 5.4 — — — 5.4 —

Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.3 (0.1) — (0.9) — (1.0) —
Balance, December 31, 2019 72.3 $ 1,800.1 $ (48.8) $ (626.2) $ 3.6 $ 1,128.7 $ 6.3

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of Business: Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B" or the "Company") is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") headquartered
in Honolulu, Hawai‘i. The Company operates three segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction. A
description of each of the Company's reporting segments is as follows:

• Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in
investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development
(i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house
leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-
day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its
portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and
industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored
neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience
and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing
venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing
real estate assets.

• Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following
activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse
legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally
derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business
activities.

• Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural
materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.

Grace Pacific owns hot-mix asphalt plants throughout the state that support its internal paving operations and third-party customers.
Grace Pacific also owns and operates a rock quarry and processing plant in Makakilo, Hawai‘i. In addition, Grace Pacific offers a
variety of related for-sale and for-rent services including temporary and permanent roadway traffic control (GP Roadway Solutions,
Inc. or "GPRS"), structural precast/prestressed concrete (GP/RM Prestress, LLC or "GPRM") and other related products and services.
Grace Pacific also holds a 50% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate, Maui Paving, LLC ("Maui Paving"), which operates primarily
on the island of Maui.

Additional activity in the M&C segment includes its share of the results of operations of an unconsolidated investment, Pohaku Pa‘a
LLC ("Pohaku"). Pohaku, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, operates rock quarries on the islands of Oahu and Maui and sells a
wide range of products that include ready-mix concrete, rock and sand aggregates and cultured stone and related products.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company owns a portfolio of commercial real estate improved properties in Hawai‘i consisting of 22 retail
centers, ten industrial assets and four office properties, representing a total of 3.9 million square feet of gross leasable area; it also owns a portfolio
of ground leases in Hawai‘i representing 153.8 acres as of December 31, 2019.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation: The Company presents its financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") as outlined in the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Accounting
Standards Codification (the "Codification" or "ASC"). The Codification is the single source of authoritative accounting principles applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company (including all wholly-owned subsidiaries), as well as all other
entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Significant investments in businesses, partnerships and limited liability companies in which the Company does not have a controlling financial
interest, but the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.

54

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

A controlling financial interest in an entity may be established (i) through the Company holding a majority voting interest or (ii) if the
Company is the primary beneficiary of an entity that qualifies as a variable interest entity ("VIE"), as defined in the Codification. The Company
evaluates all partnerships, joint ventures and other arrangements with variable interests to determine if the entity or arrangement qualifies as a VIE.
VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support
or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact
the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of
the entity. If the entity or arrangement qualifies as a VIE and the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company is required to
consolidate the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the VIE. The Company reevaluates whether an entity is a VIE as needed (i.e., when
assessing reconsideration events that result in changes in the factors mentioned above) as part of determining if the consolidation or equity method
treatment remains appropriate. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had an interest in various unconsolidated joint ventures that the Company
accounts for using the equity method. Other than the obligations described in Note 14. "Commitments and Contingencies," obligations of the
Company's joint ventures do not have recourse to the Company and the Company's maximum exposure is limited to its investment.

The consolidated financial statements include the results of GPRM, a supplier in the precast concrete industry, and GLP Asphalt, LLC
("GLP"), an importer and distributor of liquid asphalt, which are owned 51% and 70%, respectively. These entities are consolidated because the
Company holds a controlling financial interest through its majority voting interest in the entities. The remaining interest in these entities is reported
as noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements. Profits, losses and cash distributions are allocated in accordance with the
respective operating agreements.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to: (i) asset impairments,
including intangible assets and goodwill, (ii) litigation and contingencies, (iii) revenue recognition for long-term real estate developments and
construction contracts, (iv) pension and postretirement estimates, and (v) income taxes. Future results could be materially affected if actual results
differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Customer Concentration: A significant portion of Materials & Construction revenue and accounts receivable is generated directly and
indirectly from projects administered by the City and County of Honolulu and from the State of Hawai‘i. Reductions in funding of infrastructure
projects by these government agencies could reduce our revenue and profits from our M&C segment. Further, although the customer mix of real
estate sales in any given period in our Land Operations segment may be diverse in any given period, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the
Land Operations segment recognized $162.2 million of gross profit in connection with the sale of approximately 41,000 acres of Maui agricultural
land and 100% of the Company's ownership interest in Central Maui Feedstocks LLC and Kulolio Ranch LLC (collectively referred to as the
"Agricultural Land Sale") in December 2018.

Reclassifications: During the first quarter of 2019, the Company changed the presentation of its balance sheet to be unclassified in order to
be comparable with other REIT peers. The change was applied to all periods presented retrospectively. Previously reported captions for Total
assets, Total liabilities and captions within Equity were not impacted.

In November 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") finalized the Disclosure Update Simplification Project, which
eliminated Rule 3-15(a)(1) reporting of Gain or Loss on Sale of Properties by REITs. To conform with ASC 360 and the SEC rule change, the
Company has classified the gain on dispositions of real estate assets in operating income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
The Company reclassified the prior periods to conform to the current year presentation. This change resulted in an increase in operating income of
$9.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Rounding: Amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes are rounded to the nearest tenth of a million. Accordingly, a
recalculation of some per-share amounts and percentages, if based on the reported data, may result in differences.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Real estate property, net: Real estate property, net primarily represents long-lived physical assets associated with the CRE segment's
leasing activity (e.g., improved property leases and ground leases); it also includes landholdings and related assets in the Land Operations segment
that the Company holds for either possible future development or future monetization as part of its simplification strategy. The balance primarily
consists of land, buildings and improvements and is recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.

Expenditures for additions, improvements and other enhancements to real estate properties are capitalized, and minor replacements,
maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred. When assets

55

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

related to real estate properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and
any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations for the respective period.

Certain costs are capitalized related to the development and redevelopment of real estate properties, including pre-construction costs; real
estate taxes; insurance; construction costs; and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved. Additionally, the Company makes estimates
as to the probability of certain development and redevelopment projects being completed. If the Company determines the development or
redevelopment is no longer probable of completion, the Company expenses all capitalized costs which are not recoverable.

Acquisitions of real estate properties: Acquisitions of real estate properties are evaluated to determine if they should be accounted for as
asset acquisitions or business combinations. Under current guidance, acquisitions of real estate properties are generally considered asset
acquisitions. Under asset acquisition accounting, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and
tenant improvements), identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above- and below- market leases and in-place leases), and assumed
debt based on an evaluation of available information at the date of the acquisition. Based on these estimates, the purchase consideration is allocated
to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. Transaction costs incurred during the acquisition process are capitalized as a component of the
purchase consideration.

In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property
as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities and uses various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections
using appropriate discount and capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, estimates of replacement costs net of
depreciation and other available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property
as if it were vacant.

Above-market and below-market lease values are estimated based on the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated
with leases acquired) of the difference between: (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in-place at the time of
acquisition and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or an equivalent property, measured over a period equal to the
remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the estimated term of any below-market, fixed-rate renewal options for
below-market leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized to base rental revenue over the related lease term plus
fixed-rate renewal options, as appropriate.

The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationship values based on management's evaluation of the
specific characteristics of the acquired lease portfolio and the Company's overall relationship with the anchor tenants. Such amounts are amortized
to expense over the remaining initial lease term (and expected renewal periods for tenant relationships).

Real estate developments: Real estate developments represent certain costs capitalized and presented in the Land Operations segment that
relate to (i) active real estate development projects intended for sale or (ii) potential future real estate development projects intended for lease that
would be part of future CRE segment operations. For potential future real estate development projects intended for lease, when management with
the relevant authority has approved expenditures for activities clearly associated with the development and construction of a CRE segment project
(generally after all required government agency approvals have been obtained), the capitalized costs associated with such project (i.e., historical cost
of land) will be presented as Real estate property, net.

Certain costs capitalized relating to active real estate development projects intended for sale may include pre-construction costs (e.g., costs
related to land acquisition); construction costs (e.g., grading, roads, water and sewage systems, landscaping and project amenities); direct overhead
costs (e.g., utilities, maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes); capitalized interest; and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved.

For development projects, capitalized costs are allocated using the direct method for expenditures that are specifically associated with the
unit being sold and the relative-sales-value method for expenditures that benefit the entire project. Direct overhead costs incurred after the
development project is substantially complete and ready to be marketed are charged to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. All
indirect overhead costs are charged to selling, general and administrative costs as incurred.

Cash flows related to active real estate development projects intended for sale are classified as operating activities.

Capitalized Interest: Interest costs on developments and major redevelopments are capitalized as part of real estate development and
redevelopment projects that have not yet been placed into service. Capitalization of interest commences when development activities and
expenditures begin and end when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use or

56

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

ready to be marketed. Total interest costs incurred were $34.1 million, $35.9 million, and $26.4 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Capitalized interest costs related to development activities were $1.0 million, $0.6 million and $0.8 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Other property, net: Other property, net represents all other long-lived physical assets other than those presented in Real estate property,
net and Real estate developments. The balance primarily consists of long-lived assets in the M&C segment, but also contains corporate long-lived
physical assets and Land Operations long-lived physical assets that are used in other Land Operations activities and are not presented in Real estate
property, net or Real estate developments above. Other property, net is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major
renewals and betterments are capitalized. Replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as
incurred.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 other property, net was as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Land $ 38.4 $ 42.2
Buildings 19.7 20.4
Asphalt plants, machinery and equipment 105.5 116.7
Water, power and sewer systems 30.6 33.0
Other property improvements 6.8 8.1
Subtotal 201.0 220.4
Accumulated depreciation (76.6) (84.9)
Other property, net $ 124.4 $ 135.5

Depreciation: Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the
units-of-production method for quarry production-related assets. Estimated useful lives of property are as follows:

Classification Range of Life (in years)

Building and improvements 10 to 40
Leasehold improvements 5 to 10 (lesser of useful life or lease term)
Water, power and sewer systems 5 to 50
Asphalt plants, machinery and equipment 2 to 35
Other property improvements 3 to 35

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $35.6 million, $32.5 million and $32.3 million,
respectively.

Intangible Assets: Real estate intangible assets are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as Real estate intangible assets, net and are
generally related to the acquisition of commercial real estate properties. Intangible assets acquired in 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

2019 2018 2017

Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Life Average Life Average Life
Amount (Years) Amount (Years) Amount (Years)
In-place leases $ 23.2 8.2 $ 32.0 12.4 $ 0.2 2.2
Favorable leases 4.3 4.7 6.7 11.7 0.1 1.1

Real Estate intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
In-place leases $ 125.2 $ 102.1
Favorable leases 29.0 24.6

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Amortization of in-place leases (63.4) (53.2)

Amortization of favorable leases (15.9) (13.7)
Real estate intangible assets, net $ 74.9 $ 59.8

57

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Other intangible assets are included in Prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the gross carrying amount of other intangible assets was $20.2 million and $16.3 million, with related accumulated
amortization of $7.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was $12.5 million, $8.7 million, and $6.0 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Estimated amortization expenses related to intangible assets over the next five years are as follows (in millions):

Estimated
Amortization
2020 $ 12.5
2021 10.2
2022 8.4
2023 7.5
2024 5.3

In situations in which a lease or leases with a tenant have been, or are expected to be, terminated early, the Company evaluates the
remaining useful lives of depreciable or amortizable assets of the associated assets related to the lease terminated (i.e., tenant improvements, above
and below market lease intangibles, in-place lease value and leasing commissions). Based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the termination, the Company may accelerate the depreciation and amortization of such associated assets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of
purchase. The Company carries these investments at cost, which approximates fair value.

Restricted Cash: The Company's restricted cash balance at December 31, 2018 of $223.5 million primarily consisted of proceeds from
§1031 tax-deferred sales held in escrow pending future use to purchase new real estate assets. There were no material amounts of proceeds from
§1031 tax-deferred sales in the balance as of December 31, 2019.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Allowances for doubtful accounts are established by management based on estimates of collectability.
Estimates of collectability are principally based on an evaluation of the current financial condition of the Company’s customers and their payment
history, which are regularly monitored by the Company. The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts, included on the consolidated balance
sheets as an offset to Accounts receivable, net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were as follows (in millions):

Balance at Provision for Bad Write-offs Balance at

Beginning of Year Debt and Other End of Year
2019 $2.0 $1.9 $(1.2) $2.7
2018 $1.4 $1.3 $(0.7) $2.0
2017 $1.0 $1.0 $(0.6) $1.4

As of December 31, 2019, the Company's allowances for doubtful accounts relate only to accounts receivable in the M&C segment
(unrelated to leases).

Notes receivable: The Company's notes receivable are recorded at cost within Other receivables on the consolidated balance sheets.
Generally, a loans allowance is established when the Company determines that it will be unable to collect any remaining amounts due under the
agreement.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally average cost, first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. Inventories
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Asphalt $ 8.0 $ 9.4
Processed rock and sand 6.6 9.5
Work in progress 2.9 4.0
Retail merchandise 2.0 2.0
Parts, materials and supplies inventories 1.2 1.6

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Total $ 20.7 $ 26.5

58

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Leases - The Company as Lessee: The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception by considering whether that
arrangement conveys the right to use an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Operating leases are included in
Operating lease right-of-use assets ("ROU assets") and Operating lease liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets and
lease liabilities related to finance leases are included in Other property, net and Notes payable and other debt, respectively, in the Company's
consolidated balance sheets.

ROU assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to
make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of
lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate and are not readily determinable, the Company
uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at
commencement date. ROU assets also include any lease payments made at or before the commencement date and excludes any lease incentives
received. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option.
Operating lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

In connection with its application of the lease guidance, the Company has evaluated the lease and non-lease components within its leases
where it is the lessee and has elected, for all classes of underling assets, the practical expedient to present lease and non-lease components in its
lease agreements as one component. The Company has also elected, for all classes of underlying assets, to not recognize lease liabilities and lease
assets for leases with a term of 12 months or less.

Goodwill: The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.

If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge
is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit.

Refer to Note 22, "Goodwill," for additional detail.

Fair Value Measurements: ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"), as amended, establishes a fair value
hierarchy, which requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. The hierarchy places the highest priority on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1
measurements) and assigns the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs within the hierarchy are
defined as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing an asset or liability.

If the technique used to measure fair value includes inputs from multiple levels of the fair value hierarchy, the lowest level of significant
input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy.

The Company records its interest rate swaps at fair value. The fair values of the Company's interest rate swaps (Level 2 measurements) are
based on the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date and are determined using
interest rate pricing models and interest rate related observable inputs. See Note 15, "Derivative Instruments," for fair value information regarding
the Company's derivative instruments.

The fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying
values due to the short-term nature of the instruments.

The fair value of the Company's notes receivable approximates the carrying amount of $15.7 million at December 31, 2019. The fair value
and carrying amount of these notes was $16.3 million at December 31, 2018. The fair value of these notes is estimated using a discounted cash flow
analysis in which the Company uses unobservable inputs such as market interest rates determined by the loan-to-value and market capitalization
rates related to the underlying collateral at which management believes similar loans would be made and classified as a Level 3 measurement in the
fair value hierarchy.

59

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The carrying amount and fair value of the Company's debt at December 31, 2019 was $704.6 million and $727.3 million, respectively, and
$778.1 million and $758.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018. The fair value of debt is calculated by discounting the future cash flows of
the debt at rates based on instruments with similar risk, terms and maturities as compared to the Company's existing debt arrangements (Level 3).

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded aggregate impairment charges of $49.7 million, $79.4
million and $22.4 million related to goodwill and/or other long-lived assets. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an
other-than-temporary-impairment charge of $188.6 million related to equity method investments. See further discussion in the respective sections
below. The Company has classified the fair value measurements as a Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy because they involve
significant unobservable inputs such as cash flow projections, discount rates and management assumptions.

Self-Insured Liabilities: The Company is self-insured for certain losses that include, but are not limited to, employee health, workers’
compensation, general liability, real and personal property, and real estate construction warranty and defect claims. When feasible, the Company
obtains third-party insurance coverage to limit its exposure to these claims. When estimating its self-insured liabilities, the Company considers a
number of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, and valuations provided by independent third-parties.

Revenue Recognition and Leases - The Company as a Lessor: Sources of revenue for the Company primarily include commercial property
rentals, sales of real estate, real estate development projects, material sales and paving construction projects. The Company generates revenue from
three distinct business segments:

Commercial Real Estate: The Commercial Real Estate segment owns, operates, leases, and manages a portfolio of retail, office, and
industrial properties in Hawai‘i; it also leases urban land in Hawai‘i to third-party lessees. Commercial Real Estate revenue is recognized under
lease accounting guidance with the Company as lessor.

Leases - The Company as Lessor: The Company reviews its contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease. A contract is determined to be
a lease when the right to substantially all of the economic benefits and to direct the use of an identified asset is transferred to a customer over a
defined period of time for consideration. During this review, the Company evaluates among other items, asset specification, substitution rights,
purchase options, operating rights and control over the asset during the contract period.

The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately under ASC 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from lease
components for all classes of underlying assets where the component follows the same timing and pattern as the lease component and the lease
component is classified as an operating lease. Non-lease components included in rental revenue primarily consist of tenant reimbursements for
common area maintenance and other services paid for by the lessor and utilized by the lessee. Under the practical expedient, the Company accounts
for the single, combined component under leasing guidance as the lease component is the predominant component in the contract.

Rental revenue is primarily derived from operating leases and, therefore, is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease. Fixed contractual payments from the Company's leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.
Straight-line rental revenue commences when the customer assumes control of the leased premises. Accrued straight-line rents receivable represents
the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with lease agreements. Certain of the Company's lease
agreements include terms for contingent rental revenue (e.g. percentage rents based on tenant sales volume) and tenant reimbursed property taxes,
which are both accounted for as variable payments.

Certain of the Company's leases include termination and/or extension options. Termination options allow the customer to terminate the
lease prior to the end of the lease term under specific circumstances. The Company's extension options generally require a re-negotiation with the
customer at market rates. Initial direct costs, primarily commissions, related to the leasing of properties are capitalized on the balance sheet and
amortized over the lease term. All other costs to negotiate or arrange a lease are expensed as incurred.

Accounts receivable related to leases are regularly evaluated for collectability, considering factors including, but not limited to, the credit
quality of the customer, historical trends of the customer, and changes in customer payment terms. Upon determination that the collectability of a
customer receivable is not probable, the Company will reverse the receivable and record a corresponding reduction of revenue previously
recognized. Subsequent revenue is recorded on a cash basis until collectability on related billings becomes probable.

60

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Land Operations: Revenues from sales of real estate are recognized at the point in time when control of the underlying goods is transferred
to the customer and the payment is due (generally on the closing date). For certain development projects, the Company will use a percentage of
completion for revenue recognition. Under this method, the amount of revenue recognized is based on the development costs that have been
incurred throughout the reporting period as a percentage of total expected developments associated with the development project.

Materials & Construction: Revenue from the Materials & Construction segment is primarily generated from material sales and paving and
construction contracts. The recognition of revenue is based on the underlying terms of the transactions.

Materials: Revenues from material sales, which include basalt aggregate, liquid asphalt and hot mix asphalt, are usually recognized at a
point in time when control of the underlying goods is transferred to the customers (generally this occurs when materials are picked up by customers
or their agents) and when the Company has a present right to payment for materials sold.

Construction: The Company's construction contracts generally contain a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer
individual goods or services are not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and is, therefore, not distinct. Revenue is earned
from construction contracts over a period of time as control is continuously transferred to customers.

Construction contracts can generally be categorized into two types of contracts with customers based on the respective payment terms;
either lump sum or unit priced. Lump sum contracts require the total amount of work be performed under a single fixed price irrespective of actual
quantities or actual costs. Earnings on both unit price contracts and lump sum fixed-price paving contracts are recognized using the percentage of
completion, cost-to-cost, input method, as it is able to faithfully depict the transfer of control of the underlying assets to the customer.

Related to its long-term construction contracts, due to the nature of the work required to be performed, estimating total revenue and cost at
completion of the contract is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Such estimates of contract revenue and cost are
dependent on a number of factors that may change during a contract performance period, resulting in changes to estimated contract profitability.
These factors include, but are not limited to, the completeness and accuracy of the original bid; changes in the timing of scheduled work; change
orders; unusual weather conditions; changes in costs of labor and/or materials; changes in productivity expectations; and the expected, or actual,
resolution terms for claims. Management evaluates changes in estimates on a contract by contract basis and uses the cumulative catch-up method to
account for the changes in the period in which they are determined.

Certain construction contracts include retainage provisions. The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to these provisions
generally become due upon completion and acceptance of the project work or products by the owners.

The Company deems its contract prices reflective of the standalone selling prices of the underlying goods and services since the contracts
are required to go through a competitive bidding process.

On a consolidated basis, in addition to disclosing amounts recorded as contract assets or contract liabilities in its consolidated balance
sheets, the Company discloses information about the amount of contract consideration allocated to either wholly unsatisfied or partially satisfied
performance obligations (refer to Note 6, "Revenue and Contract Balances"). Related to this disclosure, the Company has elected to not disclose
information about the amount of contract consideration allocated to remaining performance obligations for certain contracts that have original
expected durations of one year or less. Although rare, this may occur with contracts for sales of real estate that are executed as of the end of the
period with control of the underlying assets to be transferred to the customer subsequent to the end of the period. The closing date of such
transactions will generally occur within one year or less of the contract execution date.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets: Long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are
reviewed for possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In such an evaluation, the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset are compared with the amount recorded for the asset to determine if its carrying
value is not recoverable. If this review determines that the recorded value will not be recovered, the amount recorded for the asset is reduced to
estimated fair value. The measurement of fair value involves judgments and estimates including, but not limited to, the timing and amount of future
cash flows, expected useful lives of the assets, comparable replacement assets, uncertainty about future events, such as changes in economic
conditions, changes in operating performance, and changes in the use of the assets and ongoing costs of maintenance and improvements of the
assets. If management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods, the Company’s financial condition or its future
financial results could be materially impacted. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of long-lived
assets or finite-lived intangible assets.

61

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company concluded that the carrying values of certain paving and quarry assets in its Materials &
Construction segment were not recoverable due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that have negatively affected sales and
margins. As a result, the Company recorded impairment charges of $40.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2018 to reduce the carrying amounts
to the estimated fair value. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3. The weighted average discount rate used in the
intangible valuation was 13.5%. Changes to Materials & Construction fixed assets and intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018
consisted of the following (in millions):

Materials & Materials &

Intangible Assets Construction Fixed Assets Construction
Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 16.5 Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 139.5
Additions to intangible assets — Additions to fixed assets 11.1
Amortization (0.9) Depreciation (11.2)
Intangible impairment (7.0) Fixed asset impairment (33.6)
Balance, December 31, 2018 $ 8.6 Balance, December 31, 2018 $ 105.8

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded aggregate impairment charges of $22.4 million related to certain of the
Company's U.S. Mainland commercial properties that were classified as held for sale. The impaired assets were measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition. The Company estimated the fair values of these long-lived assets based on the Company’s
own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the real estate assets and available, observable market data. The
Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3.

Impairment of Investments in Affiliates: The Company's investments in affiliates that are accounted for under the equity method are
reviewed for impairment whenever there is evidence that fair value may be below carrying cost. An investment is written down to fair value if fair
value is below carrying cost and the impairment is believed to be other-than-temporary.

Refer to Note 5, "Investments in Affiliates," for further discussion.

Share-Based Compensation: The Company records compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors. The Company’s various equity plans are more fully described in Note 13, "Share-Based Payment Awards."

Employee Benefit Plans: The Company provides a wide range of benefits to existing employees and retired employees, including single-
employer defined benefit plans, postretirement, defined contribution plans, post-employment and health care benefits. The Company records
amounts relating to these plans based on various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, assumed rates of return, compensation increases,
turnover rates and health care cost rate trends. The Company reviews its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the
assumptions based on current economic conditions and trends. The Company believes that the assumptions utilized in recording obligations under
the Company’s plans, which are presented in Note 11, "Employee Benefit Plans," are reasonable based on its experience and on advice from its
independent actuaries; however, differences in actual experience or changes in the assumptions may materially affect the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.

Interest and other income (expense), net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 included the following (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Pension and postretirement benefit (expense) $ (3.1) $ (3.0) $ (3.8)
Interest income 3.0 1.5 5.3
Gain (loss) on sale of joint venture interest 2.6 4.2 —
Reductions in solar investments, net (0.1) (0.5) (2.6)
Other income (expense) 0.8 0.1 0.6
Interest and other income (expense), net $ 3.2 $ 2.3 $ (0.5)

Income Taxes: The Company makes certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes.
These estimates and judgments are applied in the calculation of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, and in the calculation of certain deferred tax
assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are adjusted to the extent necessary to reflect tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary
differences reverse. Adjustments may be required to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities due to changes in tax laws and audit adjustments
by tax authorities. To the extent

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

62

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

adjustments are required in any given period, the adjustments would be included within the tax provision in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.

Discontinued Operations: In December 2016, the Company completed its final sugar harvest and ceased its sugar operations. Costs related
to the cessation of sugar operations are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Liabilities related to the
cessation of sugar operations are presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 4, "Discontinued
Operations," and Note 18, "Cessation of Sugar Operations," for additional detail.

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”): Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed and disclosed in accordance with ASC Topic 260,
Earnings Per Share. The Company utilizes the two-class method to compute earnings available to common shareholders. Under the two-class
method, earnings are adjusted by accretion amounts to redeemable noncontrolling interests recorded at redemption value. The adjustments represent
in-substance dividend distributions to the noncontrolling interest holder as the holder has a contractual right to receive a specified amount upon
redemption. As a result, earnings are adjusted to reflect this in-substance distribution that is different from other common shareholders. In addition,
the Company allocates net earnings to each class of common stock and participating security as if all of the net earnings for the period had been
distributed. The Company's participating securities consist of time-based restricted unit awards that contain a non-forfeitable right to receive
dividends and, therefore, are considered to participate in earnings with common shareholders. Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution
and is calculated by dividing net earnings allocated to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net earnings allocable to common shares by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards.

Comprehensive Income (Loss): Other comprehensive income (loss) principally includes amortization of deferred pension and
postretirement costs. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, were as follows for the years ended December 31,
2019 and 2018 (in millions):

2019 2018
Unrealized components of benefit plans:
Pension plans $ (47.4) $ (54.8)
Post-retirement plans 0.2 0.0
Non-qualified benefit plans (0.8) (0.4)
Interest rate swap (0.8) 3.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $ (48.8) $ (51.9)

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
were as follows (in millions, net of tax):

Employee Interest Rate

Benefit Plans Swap Total
Balance, January 1, 2017 $ (45.0) $ 1.8 $ (43.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of
taxes of $1.2 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate
swap, respectively (2.0) (0.2) (2.2)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of taxes of $1.8 and $0.2 for employee benefit
plans and interest rate swap, respectively 2.8 0.3 3.1
Balance, December 31, 2017 $ (44.2) $ 1.9 $ (42.3)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of
taxes of $0 (4.9) 1.0 (3.9)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of taxes of $0 3.4 — 3.4
Impact of adoption of ASU 2018-02 (9.5) 0.4 (9.1)
Balance, December 31, 2018 $ (55.2) $ 3.3 $ (51.9)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of
taxes of $0 5.3 (4.0) 1.3
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of taxes of $0 1.9 (0.1) 1.8

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Balance, December 31, 2019 $ (48.0) $ (0.8) $ (48.8)

63

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The reclassifications of other comprehensive income (loss) components out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Unrealized interest rate hedging gain (loss) $ (4.0) $ 1.0 $ (0.4)
Actuarial loss 5.3 (4.9) (3.2)
Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest
expense included in Net Income (Loss) (0.1) — 0.5
Amortization of defined benefit pension items
reclassified to net periodic pension cost:
Net loss* 4.0 4.6 4.3
Prior service credit* (0.7) (0.7) (0.8)
Curtailment (gain)/loss* (1.4) (0.6) (0.3)
Settlement (gain)/loss* — 0.1 1.4
Total before income tax 3.1 (0.5) 1.5
Income taxes — — (0.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax $ 3.1 $ (0.5) $ 0.9
* This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 11 for additional details).

Redeemable Non-controlling Interest: Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries that are redeemable for cash or other assets outside of the
Company’s control at other than fair value are classified as mezzanine equity, outside of equity and liabilities. Such amounts are adjusted at each
reporting date to the higher of (1) the amount resulting from the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for cumulative amounts of the non-
controlling interest's share of net income or loss, share of other comprehensive income or loss and dividends and (2) the redemption value on each
annual balance sheet date. The resulting changes in the carrying value, increases or decreases, are recorded with corresponding adjustments against
earnings surplus or, in the absence of earnings surplus, common stock.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"). The
guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 and should be implemented
using a modified retrospective approach, with the option to apply the guidance at the effective date or the beginning of the earliest comparative
period. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2019 and elected to use the effective date as the date of initial application. Consequently,
financial information was not updated and the disclosures required under the new standard are not provided for dates and periods before January 1,
2019. Additionally, the Company elected the "package of practical expedients," which permits the Company to not reassess prior conclusions about
lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs.

The new guidance did not have a material impact on the accounting treatment of the Company's triple-net tenant leases, which are the
primary source of our CRE revenues. However, starting in the current year, there were certain changes to the guidance under ASC 842, which will
have an impact on future operating results, including initial direct costs associated with the execution of lease agreements, such as legal fees and
certain transaction costs, will no longer be capitalizable and instead are expensed in the period incurred.

The Company recorded ROU assets and corresponding lease liabilities of approximately $31.0 million on the consolidated balance sheet
for certain leases in which it is the lessee. The adoption of ASC 842 had no impact on the Company's lease expense.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The guidance is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1,
2019. The guidance amends the hedge accounting model in ASC 815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management
activities in the financial statements and enhance the transparency and understandability of hedge results. The amendments expand an entity's ability
to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. This ASU eliminates the
requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and requires the earnings effect of the hedging instrument to be presented in the
same income statement line as the hedged item. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or results
of operations.

64

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The guidance is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1,
2019. The guidance expands the scope of ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions, with the exception of specific guidance related to
the attribution of compensation cost. The guidance also clarifies that any share-based payment awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or
services to customers should be evaluated under ASC 606. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's financial position
or results of operations.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740), which is intended to
simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and
clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of the new
standard to its financial statements and has elected to early adopt for the year ended December 31, 2019. Based on the Company's evaluation, there
were no material impacts upon adoption.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires the measurement
and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. This ASU was further updated by ASU 2018-19, Codification
Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments -
Credit Losses, ASU No. 2019-05, Targeted Transition Relief and ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments -
Credit Losses. ASU 2016-13 and related updates amend prior guidance on the impairment of financial instruments and add an impairment model
that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses with the recognition of an allowance based on an estimate of expected credit losses. ASU
2018-19 clarified that operating lease receivables are not within the scope of ASC 326 and are to remain governed by ASC 842. The provisions of
ASU 2016-13, as amended in subsequently issued amendments, is effective as of January 1, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of
this standard to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The guidance
amends and removes several disclosure requirements, including the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU also
modifies some disclosure requirements and requires additional disclosures for changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other
comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and requires the range and weighted average of significant unobservable
inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim
periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new standard will have on its consolidated
financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The guidance
clarifies current disclosures and removes several disclosure requirements, including accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be
recognized over the next fiscal year and amount and timing of plan assets expected to be returned to the employer. This ASU also requires
additional disclosures as well as explanations for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit plan obligation. This ASU is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new standard will have on its
consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs
Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation
costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or
obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, the amendments require an
entity (customer) in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which implementation
costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract and which costs to expense. The amendments also require the entity (customer) to
expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which
includes reasonably certain renewals. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and the amendments (which can be
applied either retrospectively or prospectively under the ASU) will be applied prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of
adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

3.     RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Construction Contracts and Material Sales. The Company entered into contracts in the ordinary course of business, as a supplier, with
affiliates that are members in entities in which the Company also is a member. Revenues earned from transactions

65

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

with affiliates were $10.5 million, $16.6 million, and $21.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Expenses
recognized from transactions with affiliates were $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and less than $0.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017. Receivables from affiliates were $0.2 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Amounts due to affiliates were $1.2 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Commercial Real Estate. The Company entered into contracts in the ordinary course of business, as a lessor of property, with certain
affiliates that are partially owned by a former director of the Company. Revenues earned from transactions were $1.3 million, $4.3 million and $5.2
million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Receivables from affiliates were less than $0.1 million as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Land Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized $2.2 million, $1.1 million and
$2.4 million, respectively, related to revenue for services provided to certain unconsolidated investments in affiliates and interest earned on notes
receivables from related parties. Receivables from affiliates were less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of five commercial units at The Collection high-rise
residential condominium project on Oahu from its joint venture partners for $6.9 million paid in cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company extended a five-year construction loan secured by a mortgage on real property to
one of its joint ventures. Receivables from this affiliate were $13.1 million and $13.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

4.     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In December 2016, the Company completed its final sugar harvest and ceased its sugar operations.

The revenue, operating income (loss), gain on asset dispositions, income tax benefit (expense) and after-tax effects of these transactions for
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):

2019 2018 2017

Sugar operations revenue $ — $ — $ 22.9
Sugar operations costs and expenses — — 22.5
Operating income (loss) from sugar operations — — 0.4
Sugar operations cessation costs (1.1) (0.6) (2.7)
Gain (loss) on asset dispositions (0.4) — 6.0
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
income taxes (1.5) (0.6) 3.7
Income tax benefit (expense) — — (1.3)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes $ (1.5) $ (0.6) $ 2.4

Basic earnings (loss) per share $ (0.02) $ (0.01) $ 0.05

Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ (0.02) $ (0.01) $ 0.04

There was no depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

5.     INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES

The Company's investments in affiliates consist principally of equity investments in limited liability companies in which the Company has
the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these investments. Accordingly, the Company accounts for
its investments using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investments in affiliates totaled $167.6 million and $171.4 million as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The amounts of the Company’s investment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 that represent
undistributed earnings of investments in affiliates were approximately $9.2 million and $7.8 million, respectively. Dividends and distributions from
unconsolidated affiliates totaled $12.4 million in 2019, $51.1 million in 2018 and $10.4 million in 2017.

66

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Operating results include the Company's proportionate share of net income (loss) from its equity method investments. A summary of
combined financial information related to the Company's equity method investments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in
millions):

2019 2018
Current assets $ 79.3 $ 71.1
Non-current assets 697.9 755.8
Total assets $ 777.2 $ 826.9

Current liabilities $ 27.1 $ 26.8

Non-current liabilities 109.0 149.2
Total liabilities $ 136.1 $ 176.0

A summary of the net income (loss) information related to the Company's equity method investments for each of the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Revenues $ 191.9 $ 243.6 $ 200.5
Operating costs and expenses 173.0 209.7 166.3
Gross profit (loss) $ 18.9 $ 33.9 $ 34.2
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations* $ 6.6 $ 17.4 $ 16.0
Net Income (loss)*
$ 6.6 $ 16.5 $ 15.5
* Includes earnings from equity method investments held by the investee.

The carrying value of the Company's investment in Kukui‘ula, which includes capital contributed by the Company to the joint venture and
the value of land initially contributed, net of joint venture earnings and losses and impairments, was $116.2 million and $115.4 million as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The total capital contributed to the joint venture by the Company as a percent of total committed was
approximately 62% as of December 31, 2019. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the joint venture, but exercises
significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the venture and, therefore, accounts for its investment using the equity method. Due
to the complex nature of cash distributions to the members, net income of the joint venture is allocated to the members, including the Company,
using the Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value (“HLBV”) method. Under the HLBV method, joint venture income or loss is allocated to the
members based on the period change in each member’s claim on the book value of net assets of the venture, excluding capital contributions and
distributions made during the period.

The Company also has investments in various other joint ventures that operate or develop real estate and joint ventures that engage in
materials and construction-related activities and renewable energy. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest, but has the ability to
exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these joint ventures and, accordingly, accounts for its investments in these
ventures using the equity method of accounting.

Impairment of Investments in Affiliates: When there is evidence that the fair value of the Company's investments in affiliates that are
accounted for under the equity method may be below the carrying value, the Company must determine if such decline in value is other-than-
temporary. In evaluating the fair value of an investment and whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, significant estimates and
considerable judgments are involved. These estimates and judgments are based, in part, on the Company’s current and future evaluation of
economic conditions in general, as well as a joint venture’s current and future plans. Additionally, these impairment calculations are highly
subjective because they require management to make assumptions and apply judgments to estimates regarding the timing and amount of future cash
flows that may consider various factors, including sales prices, development costs, market conditions and absorption rates, probabilities related to
various cash flow scenarios, and appropriate discount rates based on the perceived risks, among others. In evaluating whether an impairment is
other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available information, including the length of time and extent of the impairment, the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the affiliate, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for
any anticipated recovery in market value, and projected industry and economic trends, among others. Changes in these and other assumptions could
affect the projected operational results and fair value of the unconsolidated affiliates, and accordingly, may require valuation adjustments to the
Company’s investments that may materially impact the Company’s financial condition or its future operating results.

Weakness in particular real estate markets, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing or development approvals, and

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

changes in the Company’s development strategy, among other factors, may affect the value or feasibility of certain

67

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

development projects owned by the Company or by its joint ventures and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future. In the year
ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of investments in affiliates.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded impairments of investments in affiliates of $188.6 million. This amount was
primarily driven by an impairment in its investment in Kukui‘ula. In 2018, the Company determined that its investment in Kukui‘ula was other-
than-temporarily impaired as a result of changing its strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of the project. As a
result, the Company estimated the fair value of its investment in Kukui‘ula (using a discounted cash flow model) to be below its carrying value and
recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary impairment of $186.8 million. The Company classified the fair value measurement as Level 3. The
weighted average discount rate used in the valuation was 18.0%.

6.     REVENUE AND CONTRACT BALANCES

The Company recognizes revenue when control of promised goods or services is transferred to the customer at an amount that reflects the
consideration, which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by revenue type, as the Company believes it best depicts how the
nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of the Company's revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Revenue by type for the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Revenues:
Commercial Real Estate $ 160.6 $ 140.3
Land Operations:
Development sales revenue 57.2 54.3
Unimproved/other property sales revenue 32.4 210.5
Other operating revenue 24.5 24.7
Total Land Operations 114.1 289.5
Materials & Construction 160.5 214.6
Total revenues $ 435.2 $ 644.4

The total amount of contract consideration allocated to either wholly unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations was $75.7
million and $128.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company expects to recognize approximately 70% to 80% of this
contract consideration as revenue in 2020, with the remaining recognized thereafter.

Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Certain construction contracts include retainage
provisions that are customary in the industry (i.e., are not for financing purposes) and are included in Contracts retention. The balances billed but
not paid by customers pursuant to these provisions generally become due upon completion and acceptance of the project work or products by the
customers. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts represent amounts earned and reimbursable under contracts,
but have a conditional right for billing and payment, such as achievement of milestones or completion of the project. When events or conditions
indicate that it is probable that the amounts outstanding become unbillable, the transaction price and associated contract asset is reduced. Billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are billings to customers on contracts in advance of work performed, including
advance payments negotiated as a contract condition. Generally, unearned project-related costs will be earned over the next twelve months.

68

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018:

(in millions) 2019 2018

Accounts receivable, net $ 43.4 $ 49.6
Contracts retention 8.6 11.6
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 10.0 9.2
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts 7.9 5.9
Variable consideration(1) 62.0 62.0
Other long term deferred revenue 5.6 1.2

(1) Variable consideration recorded in connection with the Agricultural Land Sale. See Note 21.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized revenue of approximately $4.7 million related to the Company's contract
liabilities reported as of December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized revenue of approximately $4.2
million related to the Company's contract liabilities reported as of December 31, 2017. The amount of revenue recognized from performance
obligations satisfied in prior periods was not material.

Information related to uncompleted contracts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts $ 339.3 $ 218.0
Estimated earnings 38.3 30.3
Subtotal 377.6 248.3
Billings to date (375.5) (245.0)
Total $ 2.1 $ 3.3

7. REAL ESTATE PROPERTY, NET

Real estate property, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes the following (in millions):

2019 2018
Land $ 768.8 $ 638.3
Buildings 692.4 584.2
Other property improvements 79.0 71.3
Subtotal 1,540.2 1,293.8
Accumulated depreciation (127.5) (107.3)
Real estate property, net $ 1,412.7 $ 1,186.5

69

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

8.     NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Notes payable and other debt consisted of the following (in millions):

Principal Outstanding
Interest December 31, December 31,
Debt Rate (%) Maturity Date 2019 2018
Secured:
Kailua Town Center (1) 2021 $ 10.2 $ 10.5
Kailua Town Center #2 3.15% 2021 4.6 4.7
Heavy Equipment Financing (2) (2) 3.6 —
Laulani Village 3.93% 2024 62.0 62.0
Pearl Highlands 4.15% 2024 83.4 85.3
Manoa Marketplace (3) 2029 59.5 60.0
Subtotal $ 223.3 $ 222.5
Unsecured:
Term Loan 3 5.19% 2019 — 2.3
Term Loan 4 (4) 2019 — 9.4
Series D Note 6.90% 2020 16.2 32.5
Bank Syndicated Loan (5) 2023 50.0 50.0
Series A Note 5.53% 2024 28.5 28.5
Series J Note 4.66% 2025 10.0 10.0
Series B Note 5.55% 2026 46.0 46.0
Series C Note 5.56% 2026 23.0 24.0
Series F Note 4.35% 2026 22.0 22.0
Series H Note 4.04% 2026 50.0 50.0
Series K Note 4.81% 2027 34.5 34.5
Series G Note 3.88% 2027 35.0 42.5
Series L Note 4.89% 2028 18.0 18.0
Series I Note 4.16% 2028 25.0 25.0
Term Loan 5 4.30% 2029 25.0 25.0
Subtotal $ 383.2 $ 419.7
Revolving Credit Facilities:
GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility (6) 2020 — 0.4
A&B Revolver (7) 2022 98.7 136.6
Subtotal 98.7 137.0
Total Debt (contractual) $ 705.2 $ 779.2
Unamortized debt premium (discount) (0.1) (0.2)
Unamortized debt issuance costs (0.5) (0.9)
Total debt (carrying value) $ 704.6 $ 778.1

(1) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%, but is swapped through maturity to a 5.95% fixed rate.
(2) Loans have stated rates ranging from 4.08% to 5.00% and stated maturity dates ranging from 2021 to 2023.
(3) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.35%, but is swapped through maturity to a 3.14% fixed rate.
(4) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.00%, and is secured by a letter of credit.
(5) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.60%, based on pricing grid.
(6) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%.
(7) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.65%, based on pricing grid.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The Company's notes payable and other debt is categorized between debt instruments secured by real estate improved properties or other
assets ("Secured Debt"), unsecured notes payable and other term loans ("Unsecured Debt") and lines of credit and borrowings under revolving
credit facilities ("Revolving Credit Facilities") which includes the existing revolving credit facility used for general Company purposes ("A&B
Revolver") as well as a revolving credit facility related to one of the consolidated subsidiaries in the M&C segment (the "GLP Asphalt Revolving
Credit Facility").

70

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Secured Debt

Kailua Town Center: On December 20, 2013, the Company consummated the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, a collection of retail
assets on Oahu. In connection with the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, the Company assumed a $12.0 million mortgage note, which matures in
September 2021, and an interest rate swap that effectively converts the floating rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.95% (see Note 15). As of December 31,
2019, the balance of the mortgage note was $10.2 million. The Company also secured a $5.0 million second mortgage on the Kailua Portfolio
during the first quarter of 2017, which bears interest at 3.15% and matures in 2021. The second mortgage has an outstanding balance at
December 31, 2019 of $4.6 million.

Heavy Equipment Financing: In connection with the M&C segment, the Company enters into leases for machinery related to its businesses
that are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are further discussed in Note 9.

Laulani Village: In connection with asset acquisitions of commercial real estate improved properties made in the year ended December 31,
2018, the Company assumed a $62.0 million mortgage secured by Laulani Village that matures on May 1, 2024. The note bears interest at 3.93%
and requires monthly interest payments of approximately $0.2 million until May 2020 and principal and interest payments of approximately $0.3
million thereafter.

Pearl Highlands: On September 17, 2013, the Company closed the purchase of Pearl Highlands Center, a 415,400-square-foot, fee simple
retail center in Pearl City, Oahu (the “Property”), for $82.2 million in cash and the assumption of a $59.3 million mortgage loan, pursuant to the
terms of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 9, 2013, between PHSC Holdings, LLC and A&B Properties. On December 1,
2014, the Company refinanced and increased the amount of the loan secured by the Property. The new loan ("Refinanced Loan") was increased to
$92.0 million and bears interest at 4.15%. The Refinanced Loan matures in December 2024, and requires monthly principal and interest payments
of approximately $0.4 million. A final principal payment of approximately $73.0 million is due on December 8, 2024. The Refinanced Loan is
secured by the Property under a Mortgage and Security Agreement between the Company and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Manoa Marketplace: In 2016, ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa
Marketplace LH LLC (the "Borrowers"), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, entered into a $60.0 million mortgage loan agreement
("Loan") with First Hawaiian Bank ("FHB"). The Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% and matures on August 1, 2029. The Loan requires
interest-only payments for the first 36 months and principal and interest payments for the remaining 120 months using a 25-year amortization
period. A final principal payment of $41.7 million is due on August 1, 2029. The Company had previously entered into an interest rate swap with a
notional amount equal to the principal amount on the debt to fix the variable interest rate on the related periodic interest payments at an effective
rate of 3.14% (see Note 15). The Loan is secured by Manoa Marketplace under a Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between the
Borrowers and FHB, dated August 1, 2016.

Assets Pledged as Collateral: The approximate book values of assets used in the Commercial Real Estate segment pledged as collateral
under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2019 was $374.5 million. The approximate book values of assets used in the Materials &
Construction segment pledged as collateral under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2019 was $3.8 million. There were no assets
used in the Land Operations segment that were pledged as collateral.

Unsecured Debt

Term Loan 3: In connection with its M&C segment, Grace Pacific held a term loan with FHB which included interest at 5.19%.
Outstanding amounts for Term Loan 3 were repaid in the year ended December 31, 2019; as of December 31, 2019, there is no outstanding balance
of the Term Loan 3.

Term Loan 4: As part of a 2013 transaction where the Company obtained a controlling financial interest in Kukui‘ula Village LLC
("Village"), the Company consolidated the Village's assets and liabilities at fair value, which included a $9.4 million loan ("Term Loan 4") secured
by a letter of credit. The Term Loan 4 was interest only and included interest at LIBOR plus 2.0%. Outstanding amounts for Term Loan 4 were
repaid in the year ended December 31, 2019; as of December 31, 2019, there is no outstanding balance of the Term Loan 4.

Prudential Series Notes: In December 2015, the Company entered into an agreement (the "Prudential Agreement") with Prudential
Investment Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Prudential") for an unsecured note purchase and private shelf facility that enabled the
Company to issue notes in an aggregate amount up to $450.0 million, less the sum of all principal amounts then outstanding on any notes issued by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries to Prudential and the amounts of any notes that are committed under the Prudential Agreement. The
Prudential Agreement (which amended and renewed a then-existing agreement) had an issuance period that ended in December 2018 and contained
certain restrictive covenants for the notes issued under the Prudential Agreement that were substantially the same as the covenants contained in the
Historical Revolving Credit

71

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Facility (defined below). Borrowings under the uncommitted shelf facility bear interest at rates that were determined at the time of borrowing.

In September 2017, the Company entered into an amendment of the Prudential Agreement (the "Pru Amendment"), which amended certain
covenants (see below). Additionally, the Pru Amendment included a provision for a contingent incremental interest rate increase of 20 basis points
on all outstanding notes that was based on the Company's ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value (as defined in the Pru Amendment) measured
against the provision's allowed ratio 0.35 to 1.0 from the date of the amendment through September 30, 2018. If triggered, the contingent interest
rate adjustment would continue until such time that the Company's ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value declined to 0.35 to 1.0 or below (at
which point the provision would have no further force or effect). In October 2018, the provision was triggered and interest rates for all Prudential
Series Notes increased by 20 basis points. In March 2019, based on the Company's subsequent leverage-based ratio falling below the provision's
threshold. the interest rates for all Prudential Series Notes returned to their originally stated amounts at the time of the borrowing.

Bank Syndicated Loan: In February 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells
Fargo") and a syndicate of other financial institutions that provides for a $50.0 million term loan facility ("Wells Fargo Term Facility" or "Bank
Syndicated Loan"). The Company also drew $50.0 million under the Wells Fargo Term Facility in February 2018 and used such term loan proceeds
to repay amounts that were borrowed under the A&B Revolver. Borrowings under the Wells Fargo Term Facility bear interest at a stated rate, as
defined, plus a margin that is determined using a leverage based pricing grid.

Term Loan 5: In November 2017, the Company entered into a rate lock commitment to draw $25.0 million under its Note Purchase and
Private Shelf Agreement with AIG Asset Management (U.S.), LLC. Under the commitment, the Company drew $25.0 million in December 2017.
The note bears interest at 4.30% and matures on December 20, 2029. Interest only is paid semi-annually and the principal balance is due at maturity.

Revolving Credit Facilities

GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility: At December 31, 2017, the Company had, at one of its subsidiaries, GLP, a $30.0 million line of
credit with a maturity date in October 2018. The credit line is collateralized by the subsidiary's accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and
may only be used for asphalt purchase. The Company and the noncontrolling interest holders are guarantors, on a several basis, for their pro rata
shares (based on membership interests) of borrowings under the line of credit. In September 2018, GLP entered into a Third Amended Credit
Agreement with Wells Fargo, which amended and extended its existing $30.0 million committed revolving credit facility ("GLP Asphalt Revolving
Credit Facility"). The GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility maturity was extended to October 5, 2020. Additionally, the interest rate was reduced
by 25 basis points and a fee of 20 basis points on the unused amount of the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility has been added. All other terms
of the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility remain substantially unchanged. As of December 31, 2019, there is no outstanding balance on the
GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility.

The GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants. Based on its net income after taxes in the year ended
December 31, 2019, GLP was not in compliance with all of the covenants and received waivers on such requirements. As noted above, as of
December 31, 2019, there is no outstanding balance on the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility.

A&B Revolver: The Company had a revolving senior credit facility that provided for an aggregate $350.0 million, five-year unsecured
commitment (the "Historical Revolving Credit Facility"), with an uncommitted $100.0 million increase option. The Historical Revolving Credit
Facility also provided for a $100.0 million sub-limit for the issuance of standby and commercial letters of credit and an $80.0 million sub-limit for
swing line loans. Amounts drawn under the facilities would bear interest at a stated rate, as defined, plus a margin that is determined based on a
pricing grid using the ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value, as defined. The agreement contained certain restrictive covenants, the most
significant of which requires the maintenance of minimum shareholders’ equity levels, minimum EBITDA to fixed charges ratio, maximum debt to
total assets ratio, minimum unencumbered income-producing asset value to unencumbered debt ratio, and limitations on priority debt, as defined in
the agreement. In December 2015, the Historical Revolving Credit Facility was amended to extend the maturity date to December 2020.

In September 2017, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("A&B Revolver") with Bank of
America N.A., as administrative agent, First Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party thereto, which amended and restated the existing $350.0
million commitment under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility. The A&B Revolver increased the total revolving commitments to $450.0
million, extended the term of the facilities to September 15, 2022, amended certain covenants (see below), and reduced the interest rates and fees
charged under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility. All other terms under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility remained substantially
unchanged.

72

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

At December 31, 2019, the Company had $98.7 million of revolving credit borrowings outstanding, $1.7 million in letters of credit had
been issued against the facility, and $349.6 million remained available.

Covenants under A&B Revolver and Pru Amendment (Subsequent to Amendments)

The principal amendments under the A&B Revolver and the Pru Amendment are as follows:

• An increase in the maximum ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value from 0.5:1.0 to 0.6:1.0.
• An increase in the aggregate maximum amount of priority debt at any time from 20% to 25%.
• Allows the Company to consummate the holding company merger to adopt certain governance changes and facilitate the Company's
ongoing compliance with REIT requirements.
• Sets the minimum shareholders' equity amount to be $850.6 million plus 75% of the net proceeds received from equity issuances, less non-
recurring costs related to the REIT conversion, among other additions and subtractions.
• Allows for the payment of minimum dividends required to maintain REIT status and other dividends in any amount so long as no event of
default shall then exist or would exist after giving effect to such dividends.

As a result of the special distribution that was declared on November 16, 2017 and settled on January 23, 2018 related to the Company's
REIT conversion, the Company received waivers related to the impact of the Special Distribution on the minimum shareholder’s equity
computation for the A&B Revolver and its unsecured term loan agreements.

Debt Maturities

At December 31, 2019, debt maturities during the next five years and thereafter, excluding amortization of debt discount or premium, are
$30.9 million in 2020, $43.3 million in 2021, $128.5 million in 2022, $84.3 million for 2023, $157.0 million in 2024, and $261.2 million thereafter.

9. LEASES - THE COMPANY AS LESSEE

Principal non-cancelable operating leases include land, office space, harbors and equipment that have lease terms that expire through 2043.
Management expects that in the normal course of business, most operating leases will be renewed or replaced by other similar leases. The Company
has equipment under finance leases with lease terms that expire through 2023.

Lease expense for operating leases that provide for future escalations are accounted for on a straight-line basis. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, lease expense under operating and finance leases was as follows (in millions):

2019
Operating lease cost $ 5.1
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets 0.6
Interest on lease liabilities 0.1
Total lease cost $ 5.8

Short-term lease cost and variable lease cost were $0.7 million, $0.5 million, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2019. Sublease
income was $0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.

Lease expense for operating leases totaled $6.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 was as follows:

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) - operating leases 9.3

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) - finance leases 3.3
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases 4.4%
Weighted-average discount rate - finance leases 3.1%

73

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Supplemental cash flow information related to operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 was as follows (in
millions):

2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash outflows from operating leases $ 5.3
Operating cash outflows from financing leases $ 0.1
Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 0.6

Future lease payments under non-cancelable operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):

Operating Leases Finance Leases

2020 $ 4.6 $ 1.2
2021 4.5 1.1
2022 4.5 0.8
2023 3.3 0.5
2024 2.6 —
Thereafter 8.9 —
Total lease payments 28.4 3.6
Less: Interest (6.8) (0.1)
Total lease liabilities $ 21.6 $ 3.5

Lease liabilities for operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 are presented in the table above. ROU assets for operating and
finance leases as of December 31, 2019 were $21.8 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

Future lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in millions):

December 31, 2018

2019 $ 5.5
2020 5.4
2021 5.3
2022 5.3
2023 4.5
Thereafter 13.9
$ 39.9

10. LEASES - THE COMPANY AS LESSOR

The Company leases real estate property to tenants under operating leases. The leased property as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as
follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Leased property - real estate $ 1,511.3 $ 1,263.0
Less accumulated depreciation (125.0) (104.4)
Property under operating leases - net $ 1,386.3 $ 1,158.6

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

74

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Total rental income under these operating leases were as follows (in millions):

2019
Fixed lease payments $ 111.2
Variable lease payments 51.8
Total $ 163.0

Contingent rentals amounted to $4.7 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):

2020 $ 117.5
2021 105.0
2022 92.8
2023 82.5
2024 70.5
Thereafter 510.2
Total lease receivables $ 978.5

Future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in millions):

Operating Leases
2019 $ 97.6
2020 96.2
2021 78.2
2022 69.3
2023 59.9
Thereafter 407.8
Total $ 809.0

11.     EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has funded single-employer defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all non-bargaining unit employees and
certain bargaining unit employees. In addition, the Company has plans that provide certain retiree health care and life insurance benefits to
substantially all salaried and certain hourly employees. Employees are generally eligible for such benefits upon retirement and completion of a
specified number of years of credited service. The Company does not pre-fund these health care and life insurance benefits and has the right to
modify or terminate certain of these plans in the future. Certain groups of retirees pay a portion of the benefit costs.

Plan Administration, Investments and Asset Allocations: As the plan sponsor for its defined benefit pension plan, the Company is
responsible for the investment and management of the pension plan assets. The Company manages the pension plan assets based upon a liability-
driven investment strategy, which seeks to increase the correlation of the pension plan assets and liabilities to reduce the volatility of the plan's
funded status and, over time, improve the funded status of the plan. As a result, the asset allocation of the defined benefit pension plan is weighted
toward fixed income investments, which reduces investment volatility, but also reduces investment returns over time. In connection with the
liability-driven investment strategy, the Company appointed an investment adviser that directs investments and selects investment options, based on
established guidelines.

The Company’s weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2019 year-end target allocation, by asset
category, were as follows:

Target 2019 2018

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Fixed income securities 100% 99% 99%

Cash and cash equivalents —% 1% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100%

75

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Fixed income debt securities include investment-grade corporate bonds from diversified industries and U.S. Treasuries.

The expected return on plan assets assumption (4.30% for 2019) is principally based on the long-term outlook for various asset class
returns, asset mix, the historical performance of the plan assets under the liability-driven investment strategy, and a comparison of the estimated
long-term return calculated to the distribution of assumptions adopted by other plans with similar asset mixes. For the years ended December 31,
2019 and 2018, the plan assets experienced a positive return of 18.08% and a negative return of 5.10%, respectively.

The Company’s pension plan assets are held in a master trust and stated at estimated fair value, which is based on the fair values of the
underlying investments. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis.
Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date.

The fair values of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, by asset category, are as follows (in
millions):

Fair Value Measurements at

December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Quoted Quoted
Prices in Significant Prices in Significant
Active Observable Active Observable
Markets Inputs Markets Inputs
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) Total (Level 1) (Level 2)
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1.2 $ 1.2 $ — $ 1.4 $ 1.4 $ —
Fixed income securities
U.S. Treasury obligations — — — — — —
Domestic corporate bonds and
notes — — — — — —
Foreign corporate bonds — — — — — —
Assets measured at NAV 189.3 — — 172.2 — —
Total $ 190.5 $ 1.2 $ — $ 173.6 $ 1.4 $ —

Investments in funds that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient in accordance with ASC 820 have not
been classified in the fair value hierarchy tables above. The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund and is
determined by the investment manager or custodian of the fund. The fair value amounts presented are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair
value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the fair value of plan assets. These investments primarily include other fixed income investments and
securities.

Contributions are determined annually for each plan by the Company’s pension Administrative Committee, based upon the actuarially
determined minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the Pension Protection Act
of 2006, and the maximum deductible contribution allowed for tax purposes. In 2019 and 2018, the Company made no contributions to its defined
benefit pension plans. In 2017, the Company contributed approximately $49.2 million to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company’s funding
policy is to contribute cash to its pension plans so that it meets at least the minimum contribution requirements.

For the plans covering employees who are members of collective bargaining units, the benefit formulas are determined according to the
collective bargaining agreements, either using career average pay as the base or a flat dollar amount per year of service.

In 2007, the Company changed the traditional defined benefit pension plan formula for new non-bargaining unit employees hired after
January 1, 2008 and, replaced it with a cash balance defined benefit pension plan formula. Subsequently, effective January 1, 2012, the Company
changed the benefits under its traditional defined benefit plans for non-bargaining unit employees hired before January 1, 2008 and, replaced the
benefit with the same cash balance defined benefit pension plan formula provided to those employees hired after January 1, 2008. Retirement
benefits under the cash balance pension plan formula are based on a fixed percentage of eligible compensation, plus interest. The plan interest credit
rate will vary from year-to-year based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company amended the
cash balance pension plan such that, effective January 1, 2020, benefit accruals under the cash balance formula would cease and would be replaced
with a non-elective contribution by the Company into a defined contribution plan. All accumulated benefits under the traditional defined

76

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

benefit pension plan and the cash balance pension plan will remain credited to employees' accounts under the amendments made in 2019.

Benefit Plan Assets and Obligations: The measurement date for the Company’s benefit plan disclosures is December 31 of each year. The
status of the funded defined benefit pension plan and the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit plans at December 31, 2019 and 2018 and
are shown below (in millions):

Other Post-retirement Non-qualified Plan

Pension Benefits Benefits Benefits
2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 189.6 $ 206.1 $ 10.6 $ 12.3 $ 2.7 $ 3.4
Service cost 2.3 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Interest cost 8.0 7.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1
Plan participants’ contributions — — 0.8 0.8 — —
Actuarial (gain) loss 19.0 (11.8) (0.3) (1.4) 0.2 (0.2)
Benefits paid (14.5) (13.9) (1.5) (1.6) (0.3) (0.1)
Settlement — — — — — (0.6)
Benefit obligation at end of year $ 204.4 $ 189.6 $ 10.1 $ 10.6 $ 2.8 $ 2.7

Change in Plan Assets

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $ 173.6 $ 197.6 $ — $ — $ — $ —
Actual return on plan assets 31.4 (10.1) — — — —
Employer contributions — — 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.7
Participant contributions — — 0.7 0.8 — —
Benefits paid (14.5) (13.9) (1.5) (1.6) (0.3) (0.1)
Settlement — — — — — (0.6)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 190.5 $ 173.6 $ — $ — $ — $ —

Funded Status and Recognized Liability1 $ (13.9) $ (16.0) $ (10.1) $ (10.6) $ (2.8) $ (2.7)

1
Presented as Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s qualified pension plans was $204.4 million and $189.6 million at December 31,
2019 and 2018, respectively. Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheets in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):

Other Post-retirement Non-qualified Plan

Pension Benefits Benefits Benefits
2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Net loss (gain) (net of taxes) $ 47.4 $ 56.2 $ (0.2) $ — $ 0.8 $ 0.5
Unrecognized prior service credit (net of
taxes) — (1.4) — — — (0.1)
Total $ 47.4 $ 54.8 $ (0.2) $ — $ 0.8 $ 0.4

The information for qualified pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2019 and
2018 are shown below (in millions):

2019 2018
Projected benefit obligation $ 204.4 $ 189.6

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Accumulated benefit obligation $ 204.4 $ 189.6

Fair value of plan assets $ 190.5 $ 173.6

The estimated prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost in 2020 is negligible. The estimated net loss that will be recognized in net periodic pension cost for the
defined benefit pension plans in 2020 is $2.4 million. The estimated net loss for the other defined benefit post-retirement plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic pension cost in 2020 is negligible. The estimated prior service
cost for the other defined benefit post-retirement plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic
pension cost in 2020 is negligible.

77

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Unrecognized gains and losses of the post-retirement benefit plans are amortized over 5 years. Although current health costs are expected
to increase, the Company attempts to mitigate these increases by maintaining caps on certain of its benefit plans, using lower cost health care plan
options where possible, requiring that certain groups of employees pay a portion of their benefit costs, self-insuring for certain insurance plans,
encouraging wellness programs for employees, and implementing measures to mitigate future benefit cost increases.

Components of the net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the defined benefit
pension plans and the post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plans during 2019, 2018, and 2017, are shown below (in millions):

Non-qualified Plan
Pension Benefits Post-retirement Benefits Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost $ (2.3) $ (1.8) $ (2.8) $ (0.1) $ (0.1) $ (0.1) $ (0.1) $ (0.1) $ (0.1)
Interest cost (8.0) (7.4) (8.0) (0.4) (0.4) (0.4) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Expected return on plan assets 7.3 8.2 9.4 — — — — — —
Amortization of net loss (4.1) (4.2) (4.1) 0.1 (0.3) — — (0.1) (0.2)
Amortization of prior service cost 0.6 0.5 0.5 — — — 0.1 0.2 0.3
Curtailment gain (loss) 1.3 — — — — — 0.1 0.6 0.3
Settlement gain (loss) — — — — — — — (0.1) (1.4)
Net periodic benefit cost $ (5.2) $ (4.7) $ (5.0) $ (0.4) $ (0.8) $ (0.5) $ — $ 0.4 $ (1.3)

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit

Obligations Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net gain (loss) $ 5.2 $ (6.5) $ (2.4) $ 0.3 $ 1.4 $ (0.7) $ (0.2) $ 0.2 $ (0.1)
Amortization of net loss 1 4.1 4.2 4.1 (0.1) 0.3 — — 0.1 0.2
Amortization of prior service credit1 (0.6) (0.5) (0.5) — — — (0.1) (0.2) (0.3)
Curtailment gain recognition of prior service credit1 (1.3) — — — — — (0.1) (0.6) (0.3)
Recognition of settlement loss 1 — — — — — — — 0.1 1.4
Total recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss) 7.4 (2.8) 1.2 0.2 1.7 (0.7) (0.4) (0.4) 0.9
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
and Other comprehensive income (loss) $ 2.2 $ (7.5) $ (3.8) $ (0.2) $ 0.9 $ (1.2) $ (0.4) $ — $ (0.4)

1
Represents amortization or recognition of balances previously recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets and recognized
as a component of net periodic benefit cost.

The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit information during 2019, 2018, and 2017 were as follows:

Pension Benefits Post-retirement Benefits Non-qualified Plan Benefits

2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Weighted Average
Assumptions
Discount rate 3.29% 4.33% 3.70% 3.38% 4.38% 3.70% 2.48% 3.78% 3.50%
Expected return on
plan assets 4.30% 4.30% 6.80% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rate of compensation
increase 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% N/A N/A N/A
Initial health care cost
trend rate N/A N/A N/A 6.00% 6.20% 6.50% N/A N/A N/A
Ultimate rate N/A N/A N/A 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% N/A N/A N/A
Year ultimate rate is

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

reached N/A N/A N/A 2037 2037 2037 N/A N/A N/A

78

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

If the assumed health care cost trend rate were increased or decreased by one percentage point, the accumulated post-retirement benefit
obligation, at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 and the net periodic post-retirement benefit cost for 2019, 2018, and 2017 would have increased
or decreased as follows (in millions):

Other Post-retirement Benefits One Percentage Point

Increase Decrease
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Effect on total of service and interest
cost components $ 0.1 $ 0.1 $ 0.1 $ — $ (0.1) $ —
Effect on post-retirement benefit
obligation $ 1.0 $ 1.0 $ 1.3 $ (0.8) $ (0.8) $ (1.0)

Estimated Benefit Payments: The estimated future benefit payments for the next ten years are as follows (in millions):

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2024-2028

Estimated Benefit Payments
Pension 13.1 13.0 13.0 12.7 12.7 60.4
Post-retirement Benefits 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 2.7
Non-qualified Plan Benefits — 1.2 — — — 1.8

Multiemployer Plans: Grace and certain subsidiaries contribute to a number of multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the
terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover their union-represented employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are
different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:

a. Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating
employers.
b. If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining
participating employers.
c. If the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multiemployer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an
amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company's participation in these plans for the year ended December 31, 2019, is outlined in the table below. The "EIN Pension Plan
Number" column provides the Employee Identification Number (EIN) and the 3-digit plan number, if applicable. The most recent Pension
Protection Act (PPA) zone status available in 2019 is for the plan's year-end as of December 31, 2018, for the Pension Trust Fund for Operating
Engineers Pension Plan and Laborer's National (Industrial) Pension Fund. The zone status available for 2019 for the Hawai‘i Laborers Trust Funds
is for the plan year-end as of February 28, 2019. GPRS and GPRM have separate contracts and different expiration dates with the Hawai‘i Laborers
Trust Fund. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan's actuary. Among other
factors, plans that are less than 65% funded are "red zone" plans in need of reorganization; plans between 65% and 80% funded or that have an
accumulated funding deficiency or are expected to have a deficiency in any of the next six years are "yellow zone" plans; plans that meet both of the
"yellow zone" criteria are "orange zone" plans; and if the plan is funded more than 80%, it is a "green zone" plan. The "FIP/RP Status
Pending/Implemented" column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has
been implemented. The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective-bargaining agreements to which the plans are subject.

79

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Pension
Protection
Act Zone Contribution by Contribution by Contribution by Current
Status FIP/RP Status Entity Entity Entity Plan
2019 and Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, Surcharge Expiration Year
Fund EIN Plan No. 2018 Pending/Implemented 2019 2018 2017 Imposed Date End
Operating 94-6090764;
Engineers 001 Yellow Yes $ 4.1 $ 4.7 $ 4.9 No 8/30/20 12/31/19
Laborers 52-6074345;
National 001 Yellow Yes 0.2 0.2 0.2 No 8/31/21 12/31/19
Hawai‘i
Laborers 99-6025107;
(GPRM) 001 Green No 1.1 0.9 0.8 No 8/30/20 2/28/20
Hawai‘i
Laborers 99-6025107;
(GPRS) 001 Green No 0.2 0.2 0.2 No 9/30/24 2/28/20
Total $ 5.6 $ 6.0 $ 6.1

Based upon the most recently available annual reports, the Company's contribution to one plan, the Hawai‘i Laborers Trust Fund,
represented more than 5% of the plan's total contributions.

Defined Contribution Plans: The Company sponsors defined contribution plans that qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code and provides
matching contributions of up to 3% of eligible compensation. The Company’s matching contributions expensed under these plans totaled $0.2
million in the year ended December 31, 2019 and $0.6 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company also
maintains profit sharing plans and, if a minimum threshold of Company performance is achieved, provides contributions of 1% to 5%, depending
upon Company performance above the minimum threshold. There were $0.3 million and $0.4 million of profit sharing contribution expenses
recognized in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and no profit sharing contribution expenses in 2017.

Grace 401(k) Plans: The Company allows for discretionary non-elective employer contributions up to the sum of 10% of each eligible
employee's compensation for the 12 months in the plan year, subject to certain limitations. Management revenue sharing bonuses can be deferred to
the employee's 401(k) account, but will be subject to the IRS' annual limit on employee elective deferrals. Grace recognized discretionary employer
contribution and revenue sharing expense of $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.

12. INCOME TAXES

For taxable years prior to 2017, the Company filed a consolidated federal income tax return, which included all of its wholly owned
subsidiaries. On October 15, 2018, the Company filed its 2017 Form 1120-REIT with the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's taxable REIT
subsidiary ("TRS") filed separately as a C corporation. The Company also files separate income tax returns in various states. The Company
completed the necessary preparatory work and obtained the necessary approvals such that the Company believes it has been organized and operates
in a manner that enables it to qualify, and continue to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, the Company will generally be allowed a deduction for dividends that it pays, and therefore, will not be subject to United
States federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is currently distributed to shareholders. The Company may be subject to certain state
gross income and franchise taxes, as well as taxes on any undistributed income and federal and state corporate taxes on any income earned by its
TRS. In addition, the Company could be subject to corporate income taxes related to assets held by the REIT that are sold during the 5-year period
following the date of conversion, to the extent such sold assets had a built-in gain as of January 1, 2017. The Company does not intend to dispose of
any REIT assets after the REIT conversion within the 5-year period, unless various tax planning strategies, including Internal Revenue Code
Section 1031 like-kind exchanges or other deferred tax structures are available to mitigate the built-in gain tax liability of conversion.

Distributions with respect to the Company’s common stock can be characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income,
capital gains, unrecaptured section 1250 gains, return of capital, or a combination thereof. Taxable distributions paid for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2017 were classified as ordinary income. Distributions paid for the year ended December 31, 2018 included taxable ordinary income
and a non-taxable return of capital.

80

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The income tax expense (benefit) on income (loss) from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
consisted of the following (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Current:
     Federal $ (1.6) $ (0.3) $ (2.6)
     State (0.4) — (0.5)
Current $ (2.0) $ (0.3) $ (3.1)
     Deferred:
     Federal $ — $ 14.0 $ (200.7)
     State — 2.6 (14.4)
     Deferred $ — $ 16.6 $ (215.1)
Income tax expense (benefit) $ (2.0) $ 16.3 $ (218.2)

Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 differs from amounts computed by applying the
statutory federal rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the following reasons (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Computed federal income tax expense $ (8.2) $ (11.1) $ 3.3
State income taxes (5.1) (15.6) 0.1
Valuation allowance 8.3 84.4 6.9
REIT rate differential (7.9) (51.5) (2.2)
Tax credits, including solar — — (0.3)
Return-to-provision adjustments — — (1.1)
Amended return (1.1) 0.6 (0.1)
Share-based compensation — — (4.0)
Noncontrolling interest 0.5 (0.6) (0.7)
Rate change effect related to REIT conversion — — (223.0)
Rate change effect related to Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 — — 3.0
Impairments 12.4 10.7 —
Other—net (0.9) (0.6) (0.1)
Income tax expense (benefit) $ (2.0) $ 16.3 $ (218.2)

The change in the Company's effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018
is primarily due to the Company establishing a valuation allowance in 2018 on its net deferred tax assets and recognizing substantial 2018 REIT
income related to the Agricultural Land Sale in 2018. In addition, the Company recognized a benefit in the year ended December 31, 2019 for the
interest income on federal refunds resulting from amended returns.

81

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):

2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:
Employee benefits $ 10.4 $ 10.6
Capitalized costs 6.2 9.7
Joint ventures and other investments 49.1 55.7
Impairment and amortization 0.9 0.8
Solar investment benefits 16.7 16.7
Insurance and other reserves 3.2 2.6
Disallowed interest expense 8.4 4.4
Net operating losses 17.6 8.3
Operating lease liability 2.6 —
Other 3.4 1.5
Total deferred tax assets $ 118.5 $ 110.3
Valuation allowance (99.3) (91.5)
Total net deferred tax assets $ 19.2 $ 18.8

Deferred tax liabilities:

Property (including tax-deferred gains on real estate transactions) $ 16.0 $ 17.0
Interest rate swap — 1.0
Operating lease asset 2.5 —
Other 0.7 0.8
Total deferred tax liabilities $ 19.2 $ 18.8

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $ — $ —

Federal tax credit carryforwards at December 31, 2019 totaled $8.8 million and will expire in 2036. State tax credit carryforwards at
December 31, 2019 totaled $6.9 million and may be carried forward indefinitely under state law. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had
federal net operating loss carryforwards of $12.6 million, $3.4 million of which expire in 2037, with the remaining being carried forward
indefinitely under federal law. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of $5.0 million, of which $0.6
million of California net operating loss carryforwards will expire in 2030, $1.4 million of Hawai‘i net operating loss carryforwards will expire in
2037, and the remaining $3.0 million of Hawai‘i net operating loss carryforwards to be carried forward indefinitely.

A valuation allowance must be provided if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized,
based upon consideration of all positive and negative evidence. Sources of evidence include, among other things, a history of pretax earnings or
losses, expectations of future results, tax planning opportunities and appropriate tax law.

Due to the recent losses the Company has generated in its TRS, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that its U.S. and state
deferred tax assets will not be realized as of December 31, 2019. Therefore, the Company recorded an increase in the valuation allowance of $7.8
million on its net U.S. and state deferred tax assets for the current period. Should the Company determine that it would be able to realize its deferred
tax assets in the foreseeable future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets may cause a material increase to income in the period such
determination is made. Significant management judgment is required in determining the period in which reversal of a valuation allowance should
occur.

Balance at Balance at End of

Beginning of Year Additions Reductions Year
2019 $ 91.5 $ 7.8 $ — $ 99.3
2018 $ 6.9 $ 84.6 $ — $ 91.5
2017 — 6.9 — 6.9

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The Company’s income taxes receivable has been increased by the tax benefits from share-based compensation. The Company receives an
income tax benefit for exercised stock options calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of exercise
and the option exercise price, tax-effected. The Company also receives an income tax

82

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

benefit for restricted stock units when they vest, measured as the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of vesting, tax effected. There
were no net tax benefits from share-based transactions for 2019 or 2018.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019,
the Company recognized a $1.1 million benefit for the interest income on federal refunds resulting from amended returns. The Company has not
identified any material unrecognized tax positions and as such has no related interest or penalty accruals.

As of December 31, 2019, tax years 2016 and later are open to audit by the tax authorities. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has
one open tax examination for the 2016 Hawai‘i state income tax return. The Company believes that the result of this audit will not have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

13.    SHARE-BASED PAYMENT AWARDS

The 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan ("2012 Plan") allows for the granting of stock options, restricted stock units and common stock.
During 2018, the Company retroactively approved an increase to the shares of common stock reserved for issuance at January 1, 2018 from 4.3
million shares to 5.3 million shares. As of December 31, 2019 there were 1.5 million remaining shares available for grants. The shares of common
stock authorized to be issued under the 2012 Plan may be drawn from the shares of the Company's authorized but unissued common stock or from
shares of its common stock that the Company acquires, including shares purchased on the open market or private transactions.

The 2012 Plan consists of four separate incentive compensation programs: (i) the discretionary grant program, (ii) the stock issuance
program, (iii) the incentive bonus program and (iv) the automatic grant program for the non-employee members of the Company’s Board of
Directors. Share-based compensation is generally awarded under three of the four programs, as more fully described below.

Discretionary Grant Program: Under the Discretionary Grant Program, stock options may be granted with an exercise price no less than
100% of the fair market value (defined as the closing market price) of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally
become exercisable ratably over three years and have a maximum contractual term of ten years. There were no option grants in 2019, 2018 or 2017,
and the Company currently has no plans to issue options in the future.

Stock Issuance Program: Under the Stock Issuance Program, shares of common stock or restricted stock units may be granted. Equity
awards granted may be designated as time-based awards or market-based performance awards.

Automatic Grant Program: At each annual shareholder meeting, non-employee directors will receive an award of restricted stock units that
entitle the holder to an equivalent number of shares of common stock upon vesting.

The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands, except
weighted-average exercise price and weighted-average contractual life):

2012 Weighted- Weighted-

Plan Average Average Aggregate
Stock Exercise Contractual Intrinsic
Options Price Life Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2019 580.1 $ 12.91
Exercised (225.8) $ 11.29
Canceled (2.1) $ 13.11
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 352.2 $ 13.95 1.5 years $ 2,441
Vested or expected to vest 352.2 $ 13.95 1.5 years $ 2,441
Exercisable, December 31, 2019 352.2 $ 13.95 1.5 years $ 2,441

83

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The following table summarizes non-vested restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands, except
weighted-average grant-date fair value amounts):

Weighted-
2012 Plan Average
Restricted Grant-date
Stock Units Fair Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2019 421.3 $ 25.91
Granted 264.0 $ 20.05
Vested (149.5) $ 23.72
Canceled (81.1) $ 22.24
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 454.7 $ 23.88

The time-based restricted stock units granted to employees vest ratably over a period of three years. The time-based restricted stock units
granted to non-employee directors prior to 2018 vest ratably over a period of three years, and commencing in 2018, the time-based restricted stock
units granted to non-employee directors vest over one year. The market-based performance share units cliff vest over three years, provided that the
total shareholder return of the Company's common stock over the relevant period meets or exceeds pre-defined levels of total shareholder returns
relative to indices, as defined.

As of December 31, 2019, there was $5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units
granted under the 2012 plan; that cost is expected to be recognized over a period of three years.

The fair value of the Company's time-based awards is determined using the Company's stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of
the Company's market-based awards is estimated using the Company's stock price on the date of grant and the probability of vesting using a Monte
Carlo simulation with the following weighted-average assumptions:

2019 Grants 2018 Grants 2017 Grants

Volatility of A&B common stock 23.6% 22.7% 24.1%
Average volatility of peer companies 24.2% 21.6% 25.6%
Risk-free interest rate 2.5% 2.3% 1.6%

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the time-based restricted units and market-based performance share units granted in 2019,
2018 and 2017 was $20.05, $28.76 and $42.85, respectively. No compensation cost is recognized for actual forfeitures of time-based or market-
based awards if an employee is terminated prior to rendering the requisite service period. There was no tax benefit realized upon vesting for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Tax benefit realized upon vesting was $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Company recognizes compensation cost net of actual forfeitures of time-based or market-based awards. A summary of compensation
cost related to share-based payments is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Share-based expense:
Time-based and market-based restricted stock units $ 5.4 $ 4.7 $ 4.4
Total share-based expense 5.4 4.7 4.4
Total recognized tax benefit — — (0.5)
Share-based expense (net of tax) $ 5.4 $ 4.7 $ 3.9

Cash received upon option exercise $ 2.6 $ 0.4 $ 8.1

Intrinsic value of options exercised $ 2.6 $ 0.4 $ 13.2
Tax benefit realized upon option exercise $ — $ — $ 4.2
Fair value of stock vested $ 4.5 $ 4.0 $ 3.7

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

84

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

14.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies: Commitments and financial arrangements not recorded on the Company's consolidated
balance sheet, excluding lease commitments that are disclosed in Note 9, included the following (in millions) at December 31, 2019:

Standby letters of credit(a) $ 1.7

Bonds(b) $ 383.9

(a) Consists of standby letters of credit, issued by lenders under the Company’s revolving credit facilities, and relate primarily to the Company’s self insurance and workers' compensation plans. In the
event the letters of credit are drawn upon, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit.
(b) Represents bonds related to construction and real estate activities in Hawai‘i. Approximately $364.6 million represents the face value of construction bonds issued by third party sureties (bid,
performance and payment bonds) and the remainder is related to commercial bonds issued by third party sureties (permit, subdivision, license and notary bonds). In the event the bonds are drawn
upon, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the surety that issued the bond for the amount of the bond, reduced for the work completed to date. As of December 31, 2019, the Company's
estimated remaining exposure, assuming defaults on all existing contractual construction obligations, was approximately $39.4 million.

Indemnity Agreements: For certain real estate joint ventures, the Company may be obligated under bond indemnities to complete
construction of the real estate development if the joint venture does not perform. These indemnities are designed to protect the surety in exchange
for the issuance of surety bonds that cover joint venture construction activities, such as project amenities, roads, utilities, and other infrastructure, at
its joint ventures. Under the indemnities, the Company and its joint venture partners agree to indemnify the surety bond issuer from all losses and
expenses arising from the failure of the joint venture to complete the specified bonded construction. The maximum potential amount of aggregate
future payments is a function of the amount covered by outstanding bonds at the time of default by the joint venture, reduced by the amount of work
completed to date. The recorded amounts of the indemnity liabilities were not material, individually or in the aggregate.

The Company is a guarantor of indebtedness for an unconsolidated joint ventures' borrowing from a third party lender, related to the
repayment of a construction loan and performance of construction for the underlying project. At December 31, 2019, the Company's limited
guarantee on the indebtedness totaled $3.1 million.

Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies: Prior to the Agricultural Land Sale of approximately 41,000 acres of agricultural land on
Maui to Mahi Pono in December 2018, the Company, through East Maui Irrigation Company, LLC ("EMI"), also owned
approximately 16,000 acres of watershed lands in East Maui and also held four water licenses to approximately 30,000 acres owned by the State of
Hawai‘i in East Maui. The sale to Mahi Pono includes the sale of a 50% interest in EMI (which closed February 1, 2019), and provides for the
Company and Mahi Pono, through EMI, to jointly continue the existing process to secure a long-term lease from the State for delivery of irrigation
water to Mahi Pono for use in Central Maui.

The last of these water license agreements expired in 1986, and all four agreements were then extended as revocable permits that were
renewed annually. In 2001, a request was made to the State Board of Land and Natural Resources (the "BLNR") to replace these revocable permits
with a long-term water lease. Pending the completion by the BLNR of a contested case hearing it ordered to be held on the request for the long-term
lease, the BLNR has kept the existing permits on a holdover basis. Three parties filed a lawsuit on April 10, 2015 (the "Initial Lawsuit") alleging
that the BLNR has been renewing the revocable permits annually rather than keeping them in holdover status. The lawsuit asked the court to void
the revocable permits and to declare that the renewals were illegally issued without preparation of an environmental assessment ("EA"). In
December 2015, the BLNR decided to reaffirm its prior decisions to keep the permits in holdover status. This decision by the BLNR was challenged
by the three parties. In January 2016, the court ruled in the Initial Lawsuit that the renewals were not subject to the EA requirement, but that the
BLNR lacked legal authority to keep the revocable permits in holdover status beyond one year (the "Initial Ruling"). The Initial Ruling was
appealed to the Intermediate Court of Appeals ("ICA") of the State of Hawai‘i.

In May 2016, while the appeal of the Initial Ruling was pending, the Hawai‘i State Legislature passed House Bill 2501, which specified
that the BLNR has the legal authority to issue holdover revocable permits for the disposition of water rights for a period not to exceed three years.
The governor signed this bill into law as Act 126 in June 2016. Pursuant to Act 126, the annual authorization of the existing holdover permits was
sought and granted by the BLNR in December 2016, November 2017 and November 2018 for calendar years 2017, 2018 and 2019. No extension of
Act 126 was approved by the Hawai‘i State Legislature in 2019.

In June 2019, the ICA vacated the Initial Ruling, effectively reversing the determination that the BLNR lacked authority to keep the
revocable permits in holdover status beyond one year (the "ICA Ruling"). The ICA remanded the case back to the trial court to determine whether
the holdover status of the permits was both (a) "temporary" and (b) in the best interest of the State, as required by statute. The plaintiffs filed a
motion with the ICA for reconsideration of its decision, which was denied on July 5, 2019. On September 30, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a request
with the Supreme Court of Hawai‘i to review and reverse the ICA

85

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Ruling. On November 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Hawai‘i granted the plaintiffs' request to review the ICA Ruling. On October 11, 2019, the
BLNR took up the renewal of all the existing water revocable permits in the state, acting under the ICA Ruling, and approved the continuation of
the four East Maui water revocable permits for another one-year period through December 31, 2020.

In a separate matter, on December 7, 2018, a contested case request filed by the Sierra Club contesting the BLNR's November 2018
approval of the 2019 revocable permits was denied by the BLNR. On January 7, 2019, Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in the circuit court of the first
circuit in Hawai‘i against BLNR, A&B, and EMI, seeking to invalidate the 2019 extension of the revocable permits for, among other things, failure
to perform an EA. The lawsuit also seeks to have the BLNR enjoin A&B/EMI from diverting more than 25 million gallons a day until a permit or
lease is properly issued by the BLNR, and for the imposition of certain conditions on the revocable permits by the BLNR. The count seeking to
invalidate the revocable permits based on the failure to perform an EA has been dismissed by the court, based on the ICA Ruling in the Initial
Lawsuit. In connection with A&B’s obligation to continue the existing process to secure a long-term water lease from the State, A&B and EMI will
defend against the remaining claims made by the Sierra Club.

The Company is a party to, or may be contingently liable in connection with, other legal actions arising in the normal conduct of its
businesses, the outcomes of which, in the opinion of management after consultation with counsel, would not have a material effect on the
Company's consolidated financial statements as a whole.

15.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk related to its floating rate debt. The Company balances its cost of debt and exposure to
interest rates primarily through its mix of fixed and floating rate debt. From time to time, the Company may use interest rate swaps to manage its
exposure to interest rate risk.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company has an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $59.5 million as of December 31, 2019, which is designated
as a cash flow hedge. The Company structured the interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variability of future interest payments due to changes
in interest rates with regards to the Company's long-term debt. A summary of the key terms related to the Company's outstanding cash flow hedge
as of December 31, 2019, is as follows (dollars in millions):

Effective Maturity Fixed Notional Amount at Fair Value at Classification on

Date Date Interest Rate December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Balance Sheet

4/7/2016 8/1/2029 3.14% $ 59.5 $ (0.2) $ 3.9 Accrued and other liabilities

The liability related to the interest rate swap as of December 31, 2019 is presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet. The asset related to the interest rate swap as of December 31, 2018 was presented within Prepaid expenses and other assets. The
changes in fair value of the cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into
interest expense as interest is incurred on the related variable-rate debt.

Non-designated Hedges

As of December 31, 2019, the Company has one interest rate swap that has not been designated as a cash flow hedge, whose key terms are
as follows (dollars in millions):

Effective Maturity Fixed Notional Amount at Fair Value at Classification on

Date Date Interest Rate December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Balance Sheet

1/1/2014 9/1/2021 5.95% $ 10.2 $ (0.5) $ (0.5) Accrued and other liabilities

The following table represents the pre-tax effect of the derivative instruments in the Company's consolidated statement of comprehensive
income (loss) during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):

2019 2018
Derivatives in Designated Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives $ (4.0) $ 1.0

Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest expense
$ (0.1) $ —
included in Net Income (Loss)

86

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

The Company records gains or losses related to interest rate swaps that have not been designated as cash flow hedges in Interest and other
income (loss) in its consolidated statements of operations. There were no amounts recognized in 2019 and $0.4 million of gains recognized in 2018
related to changes in fair value.

The Company measures all of its interest rate swaps at fair value. The fair values of the Company's interest rate swaps (Level 2) are based
on the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date and are determined using interest
rate pricing models and interest rate related observable inputs.

16.    EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net earnings allocated to common shares by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net earnings
allocated to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive
effect of non-participating share-based awards, as well as adjusted by the number of additional shares, if any, that would have been outstanding had
the potentially dilutive common shares been issued.

The following table provides a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to income (loss) from continuing operations
available to A&B shareholders and net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in
millions):

2019 2018 2017

Income (loss) from continuing operations $ (36.9) $ (69.2) $ 228.1
Exclude: (Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest 2.0 (2.2) (2.2)
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to A&B
shareholders (34.9) (71.4) 225.9
Exclude: (Increase) decrease in carrying value of
redeemable non-controlling interest — — 1.8
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to A&B
shareholders (34.9) (71.4) 227.7
Distributions and allocations to participating securities (0.2) — —
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to A&B
common shareholders (35.1) (71.4) 227.7
Income (loss) from discontinued operations available to
A&B common shareholders (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
Net income (loss) available to A&B common shareholders $ (36.6) $ (72.0) $ 230.1

The number of shares used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as
follows (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Denominator for basic EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 72.2 70.6 49.2
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock unit awards — — 0.8
Special Distribution — — 3.0
Denominator for diluted EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 72.2 70.6 53.0

There were 0.2 million shares of anti-dilutive securities outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no shares of
anti-dilutive securities outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

17.     REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

The Company has a 70% ownership interest in GLP through its ownership of Grace Pacific. The redeemable noncontrolling interest of
GLP is recorded at the greater of (i) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest's share of net income or loss

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

and distributions, or (ii) the redemption value, which is derived from a specified formula. These adjustments are reflected in the computation of
earnings per share using the two-class method.

87

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

18.    CESSATION OF SUGAR OPERATIONS

A summary of the pre-tax costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 and cumulative pre-tax costs associated with the cessation of sugar
operations were as follows (in millions):

Year Ended
December 31, 2019 Cumulative Amount
Employee severance benefits and related costs $ — $ 22.1
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation — 71.3
Property removal, restoration and other exit-
related costs 1.1 11.2
Total cessation-related costs $ 1.1 $ 104.6

Activity of the cessation-related liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):

Other Exit Costs1

Balance at December 31, 2018 $ 4.1
Expense 1.1
Cash payments (1.4)
Balance at December 31, 2019 $ 3.8

1
Includes asset retirement obligations.

Cessation-related liabilities are presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2019 and 2018.

19.    SEGMENT RESULTS

Operating segments are components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur
expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to
the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. The Company operates and reports on three
segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction.

The Commercial Real Estate segment owns, operates, and manages a portfolio of retail, office and industrial properties in Hawai‘i totaling
3.9 million square feet of gross leasable area. The Company also leases approximately 153.8 acres of commercial land in Hawai‘i to third-party
lessees.

The Land Operations segment generates its revenues and creates value through an active and comprehensive program of land stewardship,
planning, entitlement, development, real estate investment and sale of land and commercial and residential properties, principally in Hawai‘i.

The Materials & Construction segment performs asphalt paving as prime contractor and subcontractor; imports and sells liquid asphalt;
mines, processes and sells rock and sand aggregates; produces and sells asphaltic concrete; provides and sells various construction- and traffic-
control-related products and manufactures and sells precast concrete products.

The accounting policies of the operating segments are described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. Reportable segments are
measured based on operating profit, exclusive of interest expense, general corporate expenses and income taxes. Revenues related to transactions
between reportable segments have been eliminated in consolidation. Transactions between reportable segments are accounted for on the same basis
as transactions with unrelated third parties.

A significant portion of Materials & Construction revenue and accounts receivable is generated directly and indirectly from projects
administered by the City and County of Honolulu and from the State of Hawai‘i. Reductions in funding of infrastructure projects by these
government agencies could reduce our revenue and profits from our M&C segment. Further, although the customer mix of real estate sales in any
given period in our Land Operations segment may be diverse in any given period, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Land Operations
segment recognized $162.2 million of gross profit from the Agricultural Land Sale to Mahi Pono.

88

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Operating segment information for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is summarized below (in millions):

2019 2018 2017

Operating Revenue:
Commercial Real Estate $ 160.6 $ 140.3 $ 136.9
Land Operations 114.1 289.5 84.5
Materials & Construction 160.5 214.6 204.1
Total operating revenue 435.2 644.4 425.5
Operating Profit (Loss):
Commercial Real Estate1 66.2 58.5 34.4
Land Operations 2 20.8 (26.7) 14.2
Materials & Construction 6 (69.2) (73.2) 22.0
Total operating profit (loss) 17.8 (41.4) 70.6
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties — 51.4 9.3
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6)
General corporate expenses (23.6) (27.6) (29.2)
REIT evaluation/conversion costs — — (15.2)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes $ (38.9) $ (52.9) $ 9.9

Identifiable Assets:
Commercial Real Estate $ 1,532.6 $ 1,530.4 $ 1,128.1
Land Operations 3 282.5 350.0 604.2
Materials & Construction 243.0 297.1 379.2
Other 26.2 47.7 119.7
Total assets $ 2,084.3 $ 2,225.2 $ 2,231.2

Capital Expenditures:
Commercial Real Estate4 $ 250.5 $ 282.7 $ 32.8
Land Operations5 2.3 1.4 1.4
Materials & Construction 1.9 11.0 6.3
Other 0.4 1.0 0.2
Total capital expenditures $ 255.1 $ 296.1 $ 40.7

Depreciation and Amortization:

Commercial Real Estate $ 36.7 $ 28.0 $ 26.0
Land Operations 1.6 1.9 1.6
Materials & Construction 11.4 12.1 12.2
Other 0.8 0.8 1.6
Total depreciation and amortization $ 50.5 $ 42.8 $ 41.4

1
Commercial Real Estate segment operating profit (loss) includes intersegment operating revenue, primarily from the Materials & Construction segment, and is
eliminated in the consolidated results of operations.
2
Land Operations segment operating profit (loss) includes equity in earnings (losses) from the Company's various real estate joint ventures and non-cash reductions
related to the Company's solar tax equity investments.
3
The Land Operations segment includes assets related to its investment in various real estate joint ventures.
4
Represents gross capital additions to the commercial real estate portfolio, including gross tax deferred property purchases but excluding the assumption of debt,
that are reflected as non-cash transactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
5
Excludes expenditures for real estate developments held for sale, which are classified as cash flows from operating activities within the consolidated statements of

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

cash flows, and excludes investment in joint ventures classified as cash flows from investing activities.
6
Materials & Construction segment operating profit (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes an impairment charge related to its goodwill of $49.7
million. Materials & Construction segment operating profit (loss) for the December 31, 2018 includes cumulative impairment charges related to long-lived assets,
finite-lived intangible assets, and goodwill of $77.8 million.

89

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

20.    REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS

2019 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company acquired five commercial real estate assets for $218.4 million that were
accounted for as asset acquisitions. Such acquisitions were structured as like-kind exchanges in accordance with Internal Revenue Code §1031,
using cash proceeds from the Agricultural Land Sale.

The allocation of purchase price to the aggregate assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the five commercial real estate
acquisitions in 2019 was as follows (in millions):

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Assets acquired:
Land $ 106.9
Property and improvements 91.3
In-place leases 23.2
Favorable leases 4.3
Total assets acquired $ 225.7

Liabilities assumed:
Unfavorable leases $ 7.3
Total liabilities assumed 7.3
Net assets acquired $ 218.4

As of the acquisition date, the weighted-average amortization periods of the in-place and favorable leases were approximately 8.2 years
and 4.7 years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period of the unfavorable leases was approximately 18.6 years.

2018 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired five commercial real estate assets for an aggregate purchase price of
$303.7 million that were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The acquisitions were largely funded through cash using §1031 proceeds from the sale
of the Company's last seven mainland properties and also from the Agricultural Land Sale. The aggregate purchase price also included a mortgage
loan with a contractual principal amount of $62.0 million that is secured by one of the properties and $2.7 million of capitalized and acquisition-
related costs paid to third parties.

The allocation of purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed were as follows (in millions):

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Assets acquired:
Land $ 92.8
Property and improvements 173.9
In-place leases 32.0
Favorable leases 6.7
Total assets acquired $ 305.4

Liabilities assumed:
Unfavorable leases $ 2.7
Notes payable and other debt1 $ 61.0
Total liabilities assumed 63.7
Net assets acquired $ 241.7
1
Includes a fair value adjustment of $1.0 million.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

As of the acquisition date, the weighted-average amortization periods of the in-place and favorable leases were approximately 12.4 years
and 11.7 years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period of the unfavorable leases was approximately 11.5 years.

90

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

21.    AGRICULTURAL LAND SALE

On December 17, 2018, A&B entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions (the "PSA") with Mahi Pono (the
"Buyer") related to the Agricultural Land Sale, which resulted in the sale of approximately 41,000 acres of Maui agricultural land and 100% of the
Company's ownership interest in Central Maui Feedstocks LLC and Kulolio Ranch LLC in exchange for cash consideration of approximately
$261.6 million, less customary closing costs and fees, subject to certain contingencies and reserves of approximately $19.5 million. The
Agricultural Land Sale closed on December 20, 2018, with the exception of approximately 800 acres that were delivered to the Buyer in February
2019. In connection with the Agricultural Land Sale, the Company recognized gross profit of approximately $162.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2018, and $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also deferred approximately $62.0 million of
revenue related to certain performance obligations involving securing adequate water to support the Buyer's agricultural plans for the land, through
an agreement with the State of Hawai‘i to provide rights to access state water for agricultural irrigation (“State Water Lease”), as well as ensuring
that the Buyer has continued access to water prior to the issuance of the State Water Lease. Under the terms of the PSA, the Company may be
required to remit amounts up to $62.0 million to the Buyer to the extent performance obligations are not met (recorded as deferred revenue of $62.0
million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018).

The Agricultural Land Sale was deemed an asset sale and represents normal recurring activity for the Land Operations segment. Revenue
and the cost of the land sold were presented within Operating Revenue: Land Operations and Cost of Land Operations, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The disposition of the Agricultural Land Sale did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since the disposition did not
represent a strategic shift in the Company’s operations. Accordingly, the operating results of the assets are reflected in the Company’s results from
continuing operations for all periods presented through the date of disposition.

In addition to the Agricultural Land Sale, in February 2019, the Company sold 50% of its interest in East Maui Irrigation Company, LLC
("EMI") to the Buyer in exchange for cash proceeds of $2.7 million and concurrently entered into a joint venture operating agreement that governs
the operation and management of EMI.

22.    GOODWILL

The Company's goodwill balance as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $15.4 million and $65.1 million, respectively, and is attributable
to the three reporting units in the M&C segment - GPC (primarily consisting of the Grace Pacific’s quarry, paving, and liquid asphalt operations),
GPRS (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific’s roadway and maintenance solutions operations) and GPRM (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific’s
prestressed and precast concrete operations) - and the CRE reporting unit, which is also a reportable segment.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (for each period a consolidated balance sheet is presented) allocated to the Company's
reportable segments starting with the year ended December 31, 2018 and continuing to the year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows (in
millions):

2018 2019
Materials & Commercial Total Materials & Commercial Total
Construction Real Estate Construction Real Estate
Balance, beginning of
year
Gross amount of $ 93.6 $ 8.7 $ 102.3 $ 93.6 $ 8.7 $ 102.3
goodwill
Accumulated — — — (37.2) — (37.2)
impairment losses
93.6 8.7 102.3 56.4 8.7 65.1

Impairment losses (37.2) — (37.2) (49.7) — (49.7)

Balance, end of year

Gross amount of 93.6 8.7 102.3 93.6 8.7 102.3
goodwill

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Accumulated (37.2) — (37.2) (86.9) — (86.9)

impairment losses
$ 56.4 $ 8.7 $ 65.1 $ 6.7 $ 8.7 $ 15.4

91

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

There is no goodwill related to the Land Operations segment.

Goodwill impairment: The goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an
income approach that is based on a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples.
Valuations performed in conjunction with the Company's goodwill impairment tests for each reporting unit assumes that each is an unrelated
business to be sold separately and independently from the other reporting units.

The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions, market factors specific
to the reporting unit, the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the business over an extended period of time and a
discount rate that considers the risks related to the amount and timing of the cash flows, among others. Under the market multiple methodology, the
estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When
using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and
proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for similar companies.

If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge
is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit.

Based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with the Company's annual goodwill impairment test in 2018, the carrying
amounts of the GPC and GPRS reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. The decline in fair
value was due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that negatively affected sales and margins. As a result, the Company recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $37.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2018.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the Company was required to perform an interim impairment test for the goodwill in each of
its three M&C reporting units due to the continued decline in M&C sales and margins in 2019, which resulted from continued, adverse market
conditions. Based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with this test, the carrying amounts of the three M&C reporting units
exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $49.7 million during the third quarter of 2019.

The Company's goodwill and impairment test estimated the fair value of the M&C reporting units using various methodologies, including
a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples and an income approach that was based on a discounted cash flow
analysis. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3. The weighted-average discount rate used in the 2018 valuation and
2019 valuation was 13.6% and 12.7%, respectively.

23.    SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On February 13, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo to execute a pay-fixed, receive variable interest rate swap
with a notional amount of $50.0 million and monthly payments through February 27, 2023 to fix the variable interest component on the Company's
existing debt at an effective rate of 1.35%.

On February 25, 2020, the Company's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per share of outstanding common stock,
payable on March 24, 2020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 9, 2020.

92

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

24.    UNAUDITED SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY INFORMATION

Unaudited quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):

2019
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue $ 129.4 $ 109.1 $ 89.1 $ 107.6
Total Operating Profit (Loss) $ 23.7 $ 13.2 $ (37.1) $ 18.0
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes $ 8.4 $ (1.3) $ (50.8) $ 4.8
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $ 9.0 $ (0.8) $ (49.8) $ 5.2

Net Income (loss) Available to A&B shareholders $ 9.0 $ (0.8) $ (49.8) $ 5.0
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ 0.12 $ (0.01) $ (0.69) $ 0.07
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ 0.12 $ (0.01) $ (0.69) $ 0.07

Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:

Basic 72.1 72.2 72.3 72.3
Diluted 72.5 72.2 72.3 72.5

2018
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue $ 113.3 $ 112.1 $ 119.4 $ 299.6
Total Operating Profit (Loss) $ 10.3 $ 18.8 $ 32.4 $ (102.9)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes $ 44.8 $ 2.8 $ 16.8 $ (117.3)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $ 47.3 $ 2.5 $ 14.8 $ (136.6)

Net Income (loss) Available to A&B shareholders $ 47.3 $ 2.5 $ 14.8 $ (136.6)
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ 0.71 $ 0.03 $ 0.21 $ (1.90)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ 0.66 $ 0.03 $ 0.20 $ (1.90)

Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:

Basic 66.4 72.0 72.0 72.0
Diluted 72.2 72.3 72.4 72.0

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company's fiscal fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

93

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. has the responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected
by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

• Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets
of the Company;

• Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

• Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting only provides reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement presentation and preparation and cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be detected.
Management does not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Additionally, the design of a control
system must consider the benefits of the controls relative to their costs. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2019, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. That report appears below.

94

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31,
2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2020,
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, Hawai‘i
February 27, 2020

95

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

A.    Directors

For information about the directors of A&B, see the section captioned “Election of Directors” in A&B’s proxy statement for the 2020
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement”), which section is incorporated herein by reference.

B.    Executive Officers

As of February 15, 2020, the name of each executive officer of A&B (in alphabetical order), age (in parentheses), and present and prior
positions with A&B and business experience for the past five years are given below.

Generally, the term of office of executive officers is at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. For a discussion of change in control
agreements between A&B and certain of A&B’s executive officers, and the Executive Severance Plan, see the subsections captioned “Other
Potential Post-Employment Payments” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement, which subsections are incorporated herein by reference.

References within this section to A&B include the Company and Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to the Holding Company Merger, which
was completed on November 8, 2017 in order to facilitate the Company's conversion to a REIT. Also, references to “A&B Predecessor” are to
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to its separation from Matson, Inc. on June 29, 2012.

Christopher J. Benjamin (56)

Chief Executive Officer of A&B, 1/16-present; President of A&B, 6/12-present; Chief Operating Officer of A&B, 6/12-12/15; President of
Land Group of A&B Predecessor, 9/11-6/12; President of A & B Properties Inc., 9/11-8/15; Senior Vice President of A&B Predecessor, 7/05-8/11;
Chief Financial Officer of A&B Predecessor, 2/04-8/11; Treasurer of A&B Predecessor, 5/06-8/11; Plantation General Manager, Hawaiian
Commercial & Sugar Company, 3/09-3/11; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2001.

Brett A. Brown (55)

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&B, 5/19-present; Treasurer of A&B, 8/19-present; Chief Financial Officer of
PREP Property Group, 2/18-5/19; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of IRC Retail Centers/Inland Real Estate
Corporation, 8/11-7/17.

Meredith J. Ching (63)

Executive Vice President, External Affairs, of A&B, 3/18-present; Senior Vice President, External Affairs, of A&B, 6/12-3/18; Senior
Vice President, Government & Community Relations, of A&B Predecessor, 6/07-6/12; first joined A&B Predecessor in 1982.

Clayton K. Y. Chun (42)

Senior Vice President of A&B, 2/19-present; Chief Accounting Officer of A&B, 1/18-present; Vice President of A&B, 3/18-1/19;
Controller of A&B, 9/15-present; Audit Senior Manager of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 9/00-8/15.

Nelson N. S. Chun (67)

Executive Vice President of A&B, 3/18-present; Chief Legal Officer of A&B, 6/12-present; Senior Vice President of A&B, 6/12-3/18;
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of A&B Predecessor, 7/05-6/12; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2003.

Lance K. Parker (46)

Executive Vice President of A&B, 3/18-present; Chief Real Estate Officer of A&B, 10/17-present; President of A&B Properties Hawai‘i,
LLC ("ABP"), 9/15-present; Senior Vice President of ABP, 6/13-8/15; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2004.

96

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

C.    Corporate Governance

For information about the Audit Committee of the A&B Board of Directors, see the section captioned “Certain Information Concerning the
Board of Directors” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.

D.    Code of Ethics

For information about A&B’s Code of Ethics, see the subsection captioned “Code of Ethics” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement, which
subsection is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

See the section captioned “Executive Compensation” and the subsection captioned “Compensation of Directors” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy
Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

See the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders” and the subsection titled “Security Ownership of Directors and
Executive Officers” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference. See the Equity
Compensation Plan Information table in Item 5 of Part II.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

See the section captioned “Election of Directors” and the subsection captioned “Certain Relationships and Transactions” in A&B’s 2020
Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services appears in the section captioned “Ratification of Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in A&B’s 2020 Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.

97

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

A.    Financial Statements

The financial statements are set forth in Item 8 of Part II above.

98

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

B.    Financial Statement Schedules

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

December 31, 2019

Costs Capitalized Subsequent Gross Amounts of Which Carried at

(in millions) Initial Cost to Acquisition Close of Period
Buildings Buildings Accumulated Date
Encum- and Carrying and Depreciation Date of Acquired/
Description brances (1) Land Improvements Improvements Costs Land Improvements Total (2) (3) Construction Completed
Commercial Real Estate
Segment

Industrial :

Kapolei Enterprise Center (HI) $ — $ 7.9 $ 16.8 $ 0.8 $ — $ 7.9 $ 17.5 $ 25.4 $ (0.4) 2019 2019

Harbor Industrial (HI) — — — 1.2 — — 1.2 1.2 (1.1) 1930 2018

Honokohau Industrial (HI) — 5.0 4.8 0.1 — 5.0 4.9 9.9 (0.4) Various 2017

Kailua Industrial/Other (HI) — 10.5 2.0 0.5 — 10.5 2.5 13.0 (0.4) Various 2013
Kakaako Commerce Center
(HI) — 16.9 20.6 1.8 — 16.9 22.4 39.3 (2.8) 1969 2014

Komohana Industrial Park (HI) — 25.2 10.8 1.0 — 25.2 11.8 37.0 (3.0) 1990 2010
2005-2006,
Opule Industrial (HI) — 10.9 27.1 — — 10.9 27.1 38.0 (0.7) 2018 2018

P&L Warehouse (HI) — — — 1.2 — — 1.2 1.2 (0.8) 1970 1970

Port Allen (HI) — — 0.7 2.4 — — 3.1 3.1 (2.2) 1983, 1993 1983-1993

Waipio Industrial (HI) — 19.6 7.7 0.5 — 19.6 8.1 27.7 (2.3) 1988-1989 2009

Office :

Kahului Office Building (HI) — 1.0 0.4 7.4 — 1.0 7.8 8.8 (8.3) 1974 1989

Kahului Office Center (HI) — — — 5.2 — — 5.2 5.2 (3.7) 1991 1991

Lono Center (HI) — — 1.4 1.2 — — 2.6 2.6 (1.6) 1973 1991
Gateway at Mililani Mauka
South (HI) — 7.0 3.5 5.1 — 5.5 10.1 15.6 (1.3) 1992, 2006 2012

Retail :
Aikahi Park Shopping Center
(HI) — 23.5 6.7 1.8 — 23.5 8.7 32.2 (2.1) 1971 2015

Gateway at Mililani Mauka (HI) — 7.3 4.7 6.4 — 7.8 10.5 18.3 (1.7) 2008, 2013 2011

Hokulei Street (HI) — 16.9 36.5 2.7 — 16.9 39.2 56.1 (2.3) 2015 2018

Kahului Shopping Center (HI) — — — 3.1 — — 3.1 3.1 (1.7) 1951 1951

Kailua Retail Other (HI) 14.8 84.0 73.8 12.1 — 84.7 85.3 170.0 (14.7) Various 2013
Kaneohe Bay Shopping Ctr.
(HI) — — 13.4 2.7 — 0.4 15.8 16.2 (7.2) 1971 2001

Kunia Shopping Center (HI) — 2.7 10.6 2.1 — 3.0 12.4 15.4 (5.2) 2004 2002

Lanihau Marketplace (HI) — 9.4 13.2 2.4 — 9.4 15.6 25.0 (4.2) 1987 2010

Laulani Village (HI) 62.0 43.4 64.3 2.9 — 43.4 67.3 110.7 (3.9) 2012 2018

Manoa Marketplace (HI) 59.5 43.3 35.9 4.8 — 45.0 38.9 83.9 (4.5) 1977 2016

Napili Plaza (HI) — 9.4 8.0 0.6 — 9.5 8.6 18.1 (1.9) 1991 2003, 2013

Pearl Highlands Center (HI) 83.4 43.4 96.2 13.1 — 43.4 109.3 152.7 (19.9) 1992-1994 2013

Port Allen Marina Ctr. (HI) — — 3.4 1.9 — — 5.3 5.3 (2.4) 2002 1971

The Collection (HI) — 2.3 4.5 1.7 — 2.3 6.2 8.5 (0.2) 2017 2018

The Shops at Kukui'ula (HI) — 8.9 30.1 4.2 — 9.2 33.9 43.1 (6.5) 2009 2013

Waianae Mall (HI) — 17.4 10.1 5.3 — 17.7 14.9 32.6 (3.1) 1975 2013

Waipio Shopping Center (HI) — 24.0 7.6 1.5 — 24.0 9.1 33.1 (2.3) 1986, 2004 2009

Lau Hala Shops (HI) — — — 37.8 — 14.5 23.2 37.7 (1.1) 2018 2018

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Hookele (HI) — — — 30.8 — 13.4 17.4 30.8 (0.4) 2017 2019

Puunene Shopping Center (HI) — 24.8 28.6 6.8 — 24.8 35.4 60.2 (2.4) 2017 2018

Queens' MarketPlace (HI) — 20.4 58.9 1.5 — 20.4 60.3 80.7 (1.2) 2007 2019

Waipouli Town Center (HI) — 5.9 9.7 0.9 — 6.0 10.5 16.5 (0.3) 1980 2019

Other :

Oahu Ground Leases (HI) — 231.6 0.1 — — 231.6 0.1 231.7 — — —

Other miscellaneous
investments — 2.5 0.1 11.7 — 2.8 11.5 14.3 (7.1) — —

Total $ 219.7 $ 725.1 $ 612.2 $ 187.2 $ — $ 756.2 $ 768.0 $ 1,524.2 $ (125.3)

99

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Description (amounts in Encum- Buildings and Carrying Buildings and Accumulated

millions) brances (1) Land Improvements Improvements Costs Land Improvements Total (2) Depreciation (3)

Land Operations Segment

Agricultural Land $ — $ 11.0 $ — $ 0.3 $ — $ 11.0 $ 0.3 $ 11.3 $ —

Kahala Portfolio — — — — — — — — —

Kamalani — — — 5.0 — — 5.0 5.0 —

Kauai Landholdings — — 0.1 5.6 — — 5.7 5.7 (0.7)

Maui Business Park II — — — 31.9 — — 31.9 31.9 —

Maui Landholdings — 0.1 0.2 6.0 — 0.1 6.2 6.3 (0.7)

Wailea B-1 — 4.6 — — — 4.6 — 4.6 —

Wailea, other — 19.9 — 8.5 (0.5) 19.9 8.0 27.9 —

Other miscellaneous investments — 1.6 — 0.8 — 1.6 0.8 2.4 (0.8)

Total $ — $ 37.2 $ 0.3 $ 58.1 $ (0.5) $ 37.2 $ 57.9 $ 95.1 $ (2.2)

(1) See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

(2) The aggregate tax basis, at December 31, 2019, for the Commercial Real Estate segment and Land Operations segment assets was approximately $698.6 million, including
outside tax basis of consolidated joint venture investments.
(3) Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated useful lives:
Building and improvements:    10 – 40 years
Leasehold improvements:    5 – 10 years (lesser of useful life or lease term)
Other property improvements:    3 – 35 years

Reconciliation of Real Estate (in millions) 2019 2018 2017

Balance at beginning of year $ 1,447.7 $ 1,325.1 $ 1,352.7
Additions and improvements 232.8 317.8 57.8
Dispositions, retirements and other adjustments (61.2) (194.7) (66.6)
Impairment of assets — (0.5) (18.8)
Balance at end of year $ 1,619.3 $ 1,447.7 $ 1,325.1

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation (in millions) 2019 2018 2017

Balance at beginning of year $ 107.6 $ 133.5 $ 122.7
Depreciation expense 24.3 20.4 18.8
Dispositions, retirements and other adjustments (4.4) (46.3) (8.0)
Balance at end of year $ 127.5 $ 107.6 $ 133.5

100

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2019
and 2018, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, and have issued our reports thereon dated February 27, 2020; such reports are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statement schedule based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, Hawai‘i
February 27, 2020

101

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

C.    Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

Exhibits not filed herewith are incorporated by reference to the exhibit number and previous filing shown in parentheses. All previous
exhibits were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. Exhibits filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 were filed under file number 001-34187. Shareholders may obtain copies of exhibits for a copying and handling charge of $0.15 per page by
writing to Alyson J. Nakamura, Corporate Secretary, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., P. O. Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96801.

2.    Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession.

2.a.  Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 10, 2017, by and among Alexander & Baldwin, Investments, LLC (formerly
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (formerly Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc.) and A&B REIT Merger
Corporation (Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K, dated July 12, 2017).

3.    Articles of incorporation and bylaws.

3.a.  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., effective as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).

3.b.  Amended and Restated Bylaws of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., effective as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, dated
November 8, 2017).

4.    Instruments defining the rights of security holders.

4.a.  Description of Capital Stock (Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).

4.b.  Form of Company Common Stock Certificate (Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).

4.c. Description of Registrant's Securities (Exhibit 4.c. to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).

10.    Material contracts.

10.a. (i)  Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, dated May 1, 2009, by and
between KDC, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Exhibit 10.6 to
Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).

(ii)  First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, dated
September 28, 2010, by and between KDC, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited
liability company (Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).

(iii)  Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, dated
July 20, 2011, by and between KDC, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited liability
company (Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).

(iv)  General Contract of Indemnity, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Kukui‘ula
Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, and DMB Communities LLC, in favor of Travelers Casualty and Surety
Company of America, dated June 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated
June 14, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).

(v)  Mutual Indemnification Agreement, among Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, DMB
Communities LLC, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), dated June 14, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated June 14, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).

(vi)  General Agreement of Indemnity, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Kukui‘ula
Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, and DMB Communities LLC, in favor of Safeco Insurance Company of America, dated August
30, 2006 and entered into September 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated
September 5, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).

(vii)  Mutual Indemnification Agreement, among Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui‘ula LLC, DMB
Communities LLC, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), dated

102

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

August 30, 2006 and entered into September 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K
dated September 5, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).

(viii)  Credit Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), First Hawaiian Bank, Bank
of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto, dated as of June 4, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated June 4, 2012).

(ix)  First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.,
A&B II, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and First Hawaiian Bank, dated December 18, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvi) to Alexander & Baldwin,
Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).

(x)  Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander &
Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Bank of America N.A., First
Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party thereto, dated September 15, 2017 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated September 19, 2017).

(xi)  Joinder Agreement, by Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., dated November 8, 2017, to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
dated September 15, 2017, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander &
Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Bank of America, N.A., First Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party
thereto (Exhibit 10.a.(xi) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).

(xii)  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 10, 2015, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Bank
of America, N.A., and other lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).

(xiii)  Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and the other purchasers party thereto, dated as of June 4, 2012
(Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated June 4, 2012).

(xiv)  Modification to Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC,
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and the other purchasers party thereto, dated as of September 27,
2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xviii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).

(xv)  Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Alexander &
Baldwin, LLC, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., dated
December 10, 2015 (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).

(xvi)  Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin,
Inc., Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management,
Inc., dated September 15, 2017 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated September 19, 2017)

(xvii)  Joinder Agreement, by Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (formerly Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc.), dated November 8, 2017,
to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated December 10, 2015, as amended, between Alexander
& Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., and the other Guarantors party thereto, on the one hand, and the Purchasers party thereto, on
the other hand (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).

(xviii)  Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, by and among Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc., Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander &
Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., dated
January 8, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xviii) to Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2017).

(xix)  Series J Senior Notes (No. J-1 through No. J-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander &
Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated
April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xix) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xx)  Series K Senior Notes (No. K-1 through No. K-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander
& Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential

103

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Insurance Company of America, dated April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xxi)  Series L Senior Notes (No. L-1 through No. L-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander
& Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated
April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxi) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xxii)  Limited Guaranty among A & B Properties, Inc., First Hawaiian Bank, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Bank of Hawaii, and Central
Pacific Bank, dated as of November 30, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated December 4, 2012).

(xxiii)  Completion Guaranty among A & B Properties, Inc., First Hawaiian Bank, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Bank of Hawaii, and Central
Pacific Bank, dated as of November 30, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated December 4, 2012).

(xxiv)  Note and Mortgage Assumption Agreement, dated January 15, 2013, among U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-IQ11, TNP SRT Waianae Mall, LLC, and A&B
Waianae LLC (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2012).

(xxv)  Loan Assumption and Amendment to Loan Documents, among PHSC Holdings, LLC, ABP Pearl Highlands LLC, Pearl Highlands
LLC, and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated September 17, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2013).

(xxvi)  Promissory Note between ABP Pearl Highlands LLC and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated November 20,
2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated December 1, 2014).

(xxvii)  Mortgage and Security Agreement between ABP Pearl Highlands LLC and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company,
dated November 20, 2014 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated December 1, 2014).

(xxviii)  Term Loan Agreement among Kukui‘ula Village LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and the other financial institutions party thereto,
dated as of November 5, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxvi) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).

(xxix)  Real Estate Term Loan Agreement among Kukui‘ula Village LLC, Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawaii), LLC, Bank of
America, N.A., and the other financial institutions party thereto, dated as of November 5, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxv) to Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).

(xxx)  Promissory Note by ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa
Marketplace LH LLC to First Hawaiian Bank, dated August 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2016).

(xxxi)  Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa
Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa Marketplace LH LLC to First Hawaiian Bank, dated August 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxv) to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).

(xxxii)  Limited Liability Company Agreement of Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC, dated as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).

(xxxiii)  Term Loan Agreement, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, the other borrowers party thereto, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and the other lenders party thereto, dated February 26, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.
(xxxiii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xxxiv)  Promissory Note by TRC Laulani Village, LLC in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated April 10,
2014 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xxxv)  Loan Assumption and Amendment to Loan Documents, among TRC Laulani Village, LLC, ABP E1 LLC, ABP ER1 LLC, and
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated February 23, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2018).

(xxxvi)  Purchase and Sale Agreement, among Hokulei Village, LLC, TRC Laulani Village, LLC, Laulani Village Pad G, LLC, and
Puunene Shopping Center, LLC, on one hand, and A & B Properties Hawaii, LLC, Series R, on the other

104

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

hand, effective as of November 22, 2017, as amended (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxvi) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).

(xxxvii)  Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC,
Series T, and A & B Properties Hawaii, LLC, Series R, and Mahi Pono Holdings, LLC, dated December 17, 2018 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-
K, dated December 20, 2018).

*10.b.1. (i)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 99.1 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(ii)  Amendment No. 1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 24, 2017 (Exhibit 10.b.1.
(ii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016).

(iii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, as assumed (Exhibit 99.1 to Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 filed on November 8, 2017).

(iv)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, as assumed on November 8, 2017, as further
amended and restated effective January 23, 2018 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(iv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018).

(v)  Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (Exhibit 99.2 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(vi)  Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 99.4 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(vii)  Form of Notice of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 10.b.1.(iv) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012).

(viii) Form of Notice of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 10.b.1(viii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2019).

(ix)  Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 10.b.1.(v) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012).

(x)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Exhibit 99.8 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xi)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Deferral Election) (Exhibit 99.9 to Form S-8 filed on June
29, 2012).

(xii)  Form of Notice of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 99.10 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xiii)  Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 99.12 to Form S-8 filed on June
29, 2012).

(xiv)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options-Executive Officers (2007 Plan) (Exhibit 99.13 to Form S-8 filed
on June 29, 2012).

(xv)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options (1998 Plan) (Exhibit 99.15 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xvi)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options (1998 Non-employee Director Plan) (Exhibit 99.16 to Form S-8
filed on June 29, 2012).

(xvii)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Executive Officer (2007 Plan) (Exhibit 99.17 to
Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xviii)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Non-employee Board Member (Exhibit 99.19 to
Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xix)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Non-employee Board Member (Deferral
Elections) (Exhibit 99.20 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

105

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

(xx)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute 2012 Performance-Based Award-Executive Officer (Exhibit 99.21 to
Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xxi)  Form of Notice of Award of Performance Share Units (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2013).

(xxii)  Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2013).

(xxiii)  Form of Notice of Award of Performance Share Units (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xix) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).

(xxiv)  Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).

(xxv)  Form of Letter Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).

(xxvi)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).

(xxvii) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, amended and restated as of July 29, 2019 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxvi) to Form 10-
Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019.

(xxviii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year Performance Improvement Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K, dated January 28,
2013).

(xxix)  Amendment No. 1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year Performance Improvement Incentive Plan, dated July 29, 2014 (Exhibit
10.b.1(xxii) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).

(xxx)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).

(xxxi)  Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan, effective as of March 1, 2013 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxiii) to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

(xxxii) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan, effective as of January 1, 2020 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxii) to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

(xxxiii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2012).

(xxxiv)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Retirement Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxiii) to Form 10‑Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2012).

(xxxv)  Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Retirement Plan for Outside Directors, effective as of March 1, 2013 (Exhibit
10.b.1(xxvi) to Form 10‑Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

(xxxvi)  Letter Agreement, dated October 22, 2009, between Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.)
and W. Allen Doane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b.1(liv) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009).

(xxxvii) Letter Agreement, dated March 21, 2019, between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and Brett Brown (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxviii) to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019).

(xxxviii) 2019 Alexander & Baldwin Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan Adoption Agreement (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxviii) to Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2019).

(xxxix) Base Plan for 2019 Alexander & Baldwin Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan Adoption Agreement (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxix) to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
*
All exhibits listed under 10.b.1. are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

21.    Subsidiaries

21.1  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Subsidiaries as of February 1, 2020.

23.    Consent

106

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated February 27, 2020.

31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

95.  Mine Safety Disclosure.

101. The following information from Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019, formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated
Statements of Operation, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v)
Consolidated Statements of Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

104. Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

107

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

(Registrant)

February 27, 2020 By: /s/ Christopher J. Benjamin

Christopher J. Benjamin
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

108

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]
Document

Signature Title Date

/s/ Stanley M. Kuriyama Chairman of the Board February 27, 2020

Stanley M. Kuriyama

/s/ Christopher J. Benjamin President, Chief Executive February 27, 2020

Christopher J. Benjamin Officer, and Director

/s/ Brett A. Brown Executive Vice President and February 27, 2020
Brett A. Brown Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Clayton K.Y. Chun Senior Vice President, Chief February 27, 2020
Clayton K.Y. Chun Accounting Officer and Controller

/s/ W. Allen Doane Director February 27, 2020

W. Allen Doane

/s/ Robert S. Harrison Director February 27, 2020

Robert S. Harrison

/s/ Diana M. Laing Director February 27, 2020

Diana M. Laing

/s/ Thomas A. Lewis, Jr. Director February 27, 2020

Thomas A. Lewis, Jr.

/s/ Douglas M. Pasquale Lead Independent February 27, 2020

Douglas M. Pasquale Director

/s/ Michele K. Saito Director February 27, 2020

Michele K. Saito

/s/ Eric K. Yeaman Director February 27, 2020

Eric K. Yeaman

109

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1545654/000154565420000007/a201910-kdoc.htm[10/09/2024 20.34.47]