0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views8 pages

9-S. M. Kadane

The paper discusses the design and optimization of manufacturing facility layouts using simulation techniques, focusing on improving space utilization and minimizing downtime. It outlines a methodology that includes analyzing raw material requirements, understanding existing processes, conducting time studies, and simulating various layout designs with software like FLEXSIM. The results demonstrate how simulation can help identify bottlenecks and enhance throughput, ultimately aiding in effective decision-making for facility layout changes.

Uploaded by

jagnnathupmanyu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views8 pages

9-S. M. Kadane

The paper discusses the design and optimization of manufacturing facility layouts using simulation techniques, focusing on improving space utilization and minimizing downtime. It outlines a methodology that includes analyzing raw material requirements, understanding existing processes, conducting time studies, and simulating various layout designs with software like FLEXSIM. The results demonstrate how simulation can help identify bottlenecks and enhance throughput, ultimately aiding in effective decision-making for facility layout changes.

Uploaded by

jagnnathupmanyu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/261700429

Manufacturing Facility Layout Design and Optimization Using Simulation

Article · January 2011

CITATIONS READS
7 21,249

2 authors:

Sandeep Madhukar Kadane Sudhir Bhatwadekar


Kolhapur Institute Of Technology's College Of Engineering Sanjay Ghodawat Group of Institutions
6 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS 33 PUBLICATIONS 124 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sudhir Bhatwadekar on 18 April 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Volume 2 G Number 1 G January-June 2011 G pp. 59-65
I J A M S
© International Science Press

Manufacturing Facility Layout Design and


Optimization Using Simulation

S. M. Kadane 1 and S. G. Bhatwadekar 2

The present paper deals with the design of manufacturing facilities layout with the
consideration of downtime of facilities and space utilization. Facility layout refers to the
arrangement of physical facilities such as machines, equipment, tools, furniture etc. in
such a manner so as to have quickest flow of material at the lowest cost and with the least
amount of handling in processing the product from the receipt of raw material to the
delivery of the final product.
Keywords: Facility layout, optimization, ABC analysis, simulation, FLEXSIM.

1. INTRODUCTION
THE plant layout is a very critical part of running an efficient and cost effective business.
All work areas, production lines, material storage facilities, etc. should be designed to
perform to the highest rate and the corresponding shortest cycle time. When designing
a plant layout it is necessary to take into account all the functions within the business.
The design must include not only the needs for the present business levels but should
also have provisions for future expansion. This is included to avoid frequent and costly
changes to the design as demand increases.
Plant Layout is the physical arrangement of equipment and facilities within a plant.
i.e. the grouping of equipment and operations in a factory for the greatest degree of
efficiency. The Plant Layout can be indicated on a floor plan showing the distances
between different features of the plant. Optimizing the layout of a plant can improve
productivity, safety and quality of Products. Unnecessary efforts of materials handling
can be avoided when the Plant Layout is optimized. This is valid for:
1. Distances through which the material has to move
2. Distances equipment has to move
3. Distances operators have to move
4. Types of handling equipment needed
5. Energy required to move items against resistance (i.e. gravity).

1
Assistant Professor, 2Associate Professor, Department of Production Engineering, Kolhapur Institute of
Technology, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, Shivaji University, (1smkadane@gmail.com) (2sgbhatwadekar@rediffmail.com)
60 International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems (IJAMS)

2. METHODOLOGY FOLLOWED FOR ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM

2.1. Raw Material Requirement


Total raw materials are divided according to their weights and this data is used for
ABC analysis. From this we come to know the importance of each type of material.
This data is helpful to decide raw material policy.

2.2. Understanding of Existing Process Sequence


To design an efficient plant layout understanding of process sequence is necessary. For
this the existing manufacturing processes are studied in sequence. The critical operations
in each process are observed carefully. This will help in redesigning the process sequence.

2.3. Time Study


The time study has to be carried out at each processing stage. It is done manually
using a stop watch and readings are recorded in time study sheet. The time study
helps in finding out the time required for each process in the sequence. This data will
be useful in deciding the capacity planning for a new plant. From the time study we
also come to know the bottlenecking stage.
2.4. Layout Designing and Simulation
After studying the process sequence and the time required for each process, the layout
designing is done. The layout is designed by taking into consideration the available
space, interrelation between two successive departments, the importance of each
process and the capacity required to achieve the desired output rate.
After designing the layouts, they are simulated using simulation software
FLEXSIM. The capacity of each workstation and the bottlenecking locations are
understand by observing the simulation results. From these results a decision is taken,
whether to revise the capacity or not. The revised plant layout is again simulated. The
revision is applied in a progressive manner. After comparing the throughput of each
layout, the one having maximum throughput rate is selected and is proposed to the
company for implementation.
3. SIMULATION OF FACILITY LAYOUTS
Simulation means process of testing an existing or new invention for modification or
use by means of a prototype. Plant designers generally have only two choices: either
physically change the layout of an existing facility and then measure results, or model
the system and measure results to develop the final facility design before making changes.
Plant layout simulation is a tool that uses data to evaluate a current facility layout and
show potential improvement areas. The same data is then used to objectively evaluate
various layout alternatives for new construction, additions, and/or re-organizations.

3.1. Need of Simulation


Facility layout problems are rather difficult in terms of analytical modeling. When the
number of departments is large, the material flow volumes between departments are
MANUFACTURING FACILITY LAYOUT DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION USING SIMULATION 61

random, and a flexible layout is desired, the problem becomes much more complex
and usually intractable analytically. Therefore, simulation has been used as a modeling
alternative to determine a good layout among a very large number of alternatives.
4. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS
Simulation software is a powerful analysis tool that helps engineers and planners make
intelligent decisions in the design and operation of a system. With the help of simulation
software, we can build a 3-dimensional computer model of a real-life system, and
then study that system in either a shorter time frame or for less cost than with the
actual system.
The simulation software should have the capabilities so that it can be successfully
used to:
1. Improve equipment utilization.
2. Reduce waiting time and queue sizes.
3. Allocate resources efficiently.
4. Eliminate stock-out problems.
5. Minimize negative effects of breakdowns.
6. Minimize negative effects of rejects and waste.
7. Study alternative investment ideas.
8. Determine part throughput times.
9. Study cost reduction plans.
10. Establish optimum batch sizes and part sequencing.
11. Resolve material handling issues.
12. Study effect of setup times and tool changeovers.
13. Optimize prioritization and dispatching logic for goods and services.
4.1. Simulation of Proposed Plant Layout Using Simulation Software (FLEXSIM)
62 International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems (IJAMS)

4.2. The Simulation Results are as follows

Figure 1 Pie Chart of Queue before Tack

Figure 2 Pie Chart of Full Welding Station

Figure 3 Pie Chart of Tack Welding


MANUFACTURING FACILITY LAYOUT DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION USING SIMULATION 63

Figure 4 Pie Chart of Finishing Station

After observing the simulation results we don’t find any stacking of components
in the queue of full welding and finishing workstations. That means the capacity of
full welding and finishing workstations are sufficient.
In the above layout two tack welding workstations are proposed, but by observing
the simulation results of the queue which supplies components to the tack welding
workstations, it is found that there is a stacking of components. 143 components are
joining the queue and only 32 components are being processed at tack welding
workstation (i.e. 111 components are to be processed). It indicates that the only
bottlenecking station is tack welding operation. So one more tack welding workstation
is introduced to remove bottlenecking and to increase the throughput.
After revision the new plant layout is as follows.
4.3. Revised Plant Layout
64 International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems (IJAMS)

4.4. The Simulation Results of Revised Plant Layout are as follows

Figure 5 Pie Chart of Queue before Tack Welding

Figure 6 Pie Chart of Full Welding Station

After observing the simulation results, it is found that the bottlenecking before
tack welding is reduced considerably and throughput rate is also increased.
The same procedure is repeated for three different layouts and they are simulated
using software. The one which is giving maximum throughput rate is selected for
implementation.
5. CONCLUSION
By observing the simulation results the layout which gives desired throughput rate
can be selected. The simulation provides the data which helps in the decision making
MANUFACTURING FACILITY LAYOUT DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION USING SIMULATION 65

before costly changes or investments are made. It also maximizes the chances of
successful implementation.

References
[1] Adil, Baykaso lu and Nabil N. Z. Gindyb (2004), A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for
Dynamic Layout Problem, Computers & Operations Research, 31, 313-315.
[2] Allegri Theodore H. (1987), Material Handling Principles and Practices, CBS Publications
and Distributors (New Delhi), First Edition.
[3] Andrew Kusiak and Sunderesh S. Heragu (1987), The Facility Layout Problem, European
Journal of Operational Research, 29, 229-251.
[4] Balakrishnan Jaydeep, Chun Hung Cheng (2006), A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for the
Dynamic Plant Layout Problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 87-89.
[5] Bryan A. Norman, Alice E. Smith (2006), A Continuous Approach To Considering
Uncertainty in Facility Design, Computers and Operations Research Archive, 33, 1760–1775.
[6] Catherine M. Harmonosky, Gregory K. Tothero (1992), A Multi-Factor Plant Layout
Methodology, International Journal of Production Research, August, 30, 1773–1789.
[7] Deb S. K., Dr. B Bhattacharya (2005), Computerized Plant Layout Design Using Hybrid
Methodology Under Manufacturing Environment, International Journal of Production
Research, March, 85 , 830–845.
[8] Esra E. Aleisa, Li Lin (2005), For Effective Facilities Planning: Layout Optimization Then
Simulation, Or Vice Versa?, Proceeding of Winter Simulation Conference, 1381-1385.
[9] Fabrice Alizon, Yves Dallery, Imen Essafi, Dominique Feillet (2009), Optimising Material
Handling Costs in An Assembly Workshop, International Journal of Production Research, 47,
3853-3866.
[10] Mehmet Savsar (1991), Flexible Facility Layout by Simulation, Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 20, 155-165.
[11] Rajhans N. R., Dr. Ahuja B. B. (2005), Analyzing Decision Factors for Redesigning a Plant
Layout Using Analytical Hierarchical Processing, IE (I) Journal. ID ,Vol. 86, May.
[12] Teicholz Eric (2001), Facility Design and Management Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
[13] Tompkins James A., White John A., Bozer, Yavuz A, Tanchoco J. M. A., Van Norman, Jerry
Banks, Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and
Practice, Wiley, September 1998
[14] Ziaia Reza M. and Dileep R. Sule (1991), Computerized Facility Layout Design,
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 21, 385-389.

View publication stats

You might also like