Ijasft 8 237
Ijasft 8 237
  the wheat flours with different                                                                                      Iran, Tel: 00989125248721; Fax: 00982636679059;
                                                                                                                       E-mail:
https://www.peertechzpublications.com
Abstract
     In this study, the effect of oxidative improvers such as glucose oxidase (10-30 mg/kg) and ascorbic acid (50–150 mg/kg) were compared on the rheological properties
of two sets of flours with different extraction rates (75% and 82%). The optimized formulation via the response surface method revealed that the oxidative improvers have
a different reaction in different types of flours. In flours with a 75% extraction rate, glucose oxidase played the main role, while in the flours with an 82% extraction rate,
ascorbic acid was more effective. Also, this study showed that the effects of both improvers are dose-dependent, for the 75% extraction rate of flour, the optimal dose of
glucose oxidase is 23 mg/kg, and for the 82% extraction rate of flour, the optimal dosage is 90 mg/kg of ascorbic acid. Finally, the effect of the optimal formulation was
investigated on the bread properties and the results were compared with the control sample.
001
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                     https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
 flour, respectively and the falling number was 300 s. L(+)-                                 the ICC method of 114/1, weighting of the dough pieces,
 Ascorbic acid (E 300) was purchased from Henan Tech way                                     homogenization and shaping of the dough into a cylindrical
 Co, Zhengzhou, China. Glucose oxidase enzyme (E.C.1.1.304)                                  piece, fixing of the sample in the proving cabinet, stretching
 derived from Aspergillus oryzae with the activity of 10000 u                                of the sample until it tears. The force exerted is recorded as
 / g was obtained from DSM Co, Heerlen, Netherlands. The                                     a function of time in the extensogram. Subsequently, the
 additives ranges were (50-150 mg/g) for ascorbic acid and (10-                              extensogram is evaluated by the software program. The
 30 mg/g) for glucose oxidase according to their manufacture’s                               reason for choosing the extensograph device, compared to
 recommendations. Used levels of the additives are given in                                  other rheological instruments (Gluten Index, Farinograph,
                                                                                             Mixolab instruments) for measuring the rheological properties
 Table 1.
                                                                                             of the dough is because of the improved ability of this device
     In this study, six samples of wheat flour were divided into two                         to measure the quality of flour after adding the improvers
 groups (each group contained three flour samples) according                                 because there is a dough resting step in extensograph which
 to the milling extraction rates (American classification). The                              give enough time to improvers for having the better activity.
 milling extraction rate is determined by the ash content. The                               After measuring the rheological properties, the optimal
 ash content of the first set was between 0.5- 0.6% (extraction                              oxidative improver for each flour set was determined by the
 rate of 75 %), the ash content of the second set was between                                Response Surface Methodology [5]. The bread baking process
                                                                                             was done after adding the optimal improver and the results
 0.75-0.9% (extraction rate of 82%).
                                                                                             were compared with the control bread sample. In this study,
     After preparing two sets of flour, the analytical flour quality                         all experiments were performed in triplicate and the average
 was determined (Table 1). Then the effects of ascorbic acid                                 results of each group were reported.
 and glucose oxidase on the dough rheological properties were
                                                                                             Characterization of wheat flours
 evaluated by Brabender Extensograph instrument (Brabender
 GmbH Co, Duisburg, Germany). The measuring procedure with                                       The moisture, protein, ash, and gluten content were
 the Extensograph has been done according to the international                               determined using AACC methods (Approved Methods of the
 standard( AACC 54-10). Basically the procedure is as follows;                               American Association of Cereal Chemists International, 11th
 preparation of the dough in the Brabender farinograph                                       edition, 2000), 44-10.01, 46-13.01, 08-01.01, and 38-12-02
 (Brabender GmbH Co, Duisburg, Germany) according to                                         (AACC, 2010), respectively.
Table 1: Central composite design for the additives and Extensograph parameters (responses) in relation to the addition of the additives (glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid).
      Flour Type                                        Additives Levels                                                 Responses (Depended variables)
                            Run No             Go(mg/kg)              AsA(mg/kg)                  R(BU)              Rmax(BU)                 E(mm)                 Energy(cm2)
                               1                   20                       30                     628                   650                    107                       96
                               2                   20                      100                     523                   567                    110                       86
                               3                   20                      100                     514                   553                    116                       90
                               4                   10                      150                     505                   544                    112                       84
                               5                   10                       50                     540                   570                    116                       90
        Flour
                               6                   20                      100                     518                   559                    114                       88
         With
                               7                   20                      100                     511                   577                    110                       91
         75%
                               8                   20                      100                     513                   560                    115                       89
      Extraction
                               9                   35                      100                     517                   559                    117                       91
         Rate
                               10                  30                      150                     534                   564                    105                       82
                               11                  30                       50                     594                   621                    102                       87
                               12                  5                       100                     458                   507                    121                       84
                               13                  20                      170                     537                   589                    110                       89
                               14                  0                         0                     340                   362                    122                       64
                               1                   10                       50                     337                   367                    118                       66
                               2                   30                       50                     453                   480                    110                       76
                               3                   30                      150                     408                   449                    115                       74
                               4                   10                      150                     412                   436                    106                       65
                               5                   20                      100                     451                   469                    110                       73
        Flour
                               6                   20                      100                     458                   479                    114                       77
         With
                               7                   20                       50                     372                   387                    117                       68
         82%
                               8                   20                      100                     453                   475                    112                       76
      Extraction
                               9                   20                      100                     459                   480                    113                       77
         Rate
                               10                  20                      100                     460                   487                    112                       78
                               11                  5                       100                     480                   520                    111                       74
                               12                  35                      100                     540                   570                    111                       77
                               13                  20                      170                     360                   370                    107                       66
                               14                  0                         0                     245                   249                    134                       51
-Bu: Brabender unit; Go: Glucose oxidase; AsA: Ascorbic acid; R: Resistance to extension; Rmax: Maximum resistance to extension; E: Elasticity.
-Run number of 14 is control sample.
                                                                                                                                                                                   002
 Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
 Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                    https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
     Alpha-amylase enzyme activity was analyzed according                                          Sensory evaluation: Sensory evaluation tests were done
 to AACC method 56-81-03 by Falling Number (FN) device                                      by ten trained judges including males (5) and females (5)
 (Infracont Co, Pomez, Hungary).                                                            in the age group of 20-50. External characteristics such as
                                                                                            (volume, crust, color, shred and symmetry of form and crust
 Determination of the rheological properties                                                characteristics) and internal characteristics such as (grain,
                                                                                            crumb color, aroma, and taste, chewability, and crumb texture)
     A Brabender extensograph was used for determining the
                                                                                            were scored for each loaf according to the bread score method
 rheological properties of flours. The following parameters
                                                                                            developed by the American Institute of Baking and reported by
 were determined in the extensograph analysis: resistance to
 extension (R-value), maximum resistance to extension (Rmax-                                Matz (1991). These scores were converted into a global concept
 value), energy, and dough extensibility (E-value).                                         determined as: very good (>90), good (80–90), regular (70–
                                                                                            80), and detestable (<70) (Shafiesoltani, et al. 2013).
 Bread baking
                                                                                            Statistical analysis
     The bread baking was performed according to the straight
 dough method according to AACC method 10-09.01 (Approved                                          The effects of oxidative improvers on the dough rheological
 Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists                                     properties were determined by Response Surface Methodology
 International, 11th edition, 2000), the protocol used was:                                 (RSM) using CCD (Khuri and Mukhopadhyay 2010). Response
 flour 100%, compressed yeast 2%, salt 2%, sugar 4%, fat                                    Surface Methodology can be regarded as a collection of statistical
 3%, and water as much as necessary for reaching the optimal                                and mathematical techniques. The independent variables were
 consistency of 500 BU. The dough was prepared from 300g                                    ascorbic acid (50- 150 mg/kg) and glucose oxidase (10-30 mg/
 of flour in a Farinograph (Brabender GmbH Co, Duisburg,                                    kg). The dependent variables were: resistance to extension
 Germany). Dough dividing and roll shaping were made by hand                                (R-value),         maximum            resistance        to     extension         (Rmax-
 and after the standard proofing time, the pieces of dough were                             value), energy, and dough extensibility (E-value). A central
 baked at 204°C for 25 minutes.                                                             Composite Design (CCD) with five coded levels (- 1.41, -1, 0,
                                                                                            +1, and +1.41) was used for studying the effect of independent
 Bread Tests                                                                                variables on the dough properties. According to this design,
                                                                                            the total number of treatment combinations was 13 (Table 2).
     Specific volume: Specific volume was determined by the
                                                                                            The CCD and statistical analysis of the data were done with
 seed displacement method (AACC method 10-05.01) and was
                                                                                            the Design-Expert software package (version 11, State-Ease
 calculated as the ratio (v/m). Specific volume determination
                                                                                            Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Coded models were generated to
 was carried out on bread samples one hour after baking in
                                                                                            relate independent variables to the dough. Analysis of variance
 triplicate.
                                                                                            (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate significant differences and
     Shape ratio: The height and width of the central slice of the                          check the adjusted and predicted coefficient of determination
 bread were measured using a pachymeter and the shape was                                   (R2 values). The significant test level was set at 5% ( p<0.05).
 determined by the height/width ratio. A ratio of 0.5 indicates a
                                                                                                   For comparing the results of bread characteristics before
 regular roll shape; a ratio above 0.5 indicates a spherical shape,
                                                                                            and after adding the additives, ANOVA and the T-test method
 whilst a ratio below 0.5 indicates a flat shape (Shafiesoltani, et
                                                                                            were used by SPSS software.
 al. 2013).
Table 2: Coded models and coefficient for extensograph parameters as a function of the quantities of the glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid.
        Flour
                                               Intercept                A                      B                   AB                   A²                    B²                 R2
        type
                               R                 515.8               20.804                -27.961                -6.25              -12.087               35.412               0.98
                           p-values                                 < 0.0001               < 0.0001              0.1287              0.0032               < 0.0001
       Flour
                               E                  113                -3.3321               0.40533                1.75                 1.75                  -3.5               0.66
        With
                           p-values                                  0.0529                 0.7853               0.4162              0.2920                0.0567
        75%
                            R max                563.2               18.067                -21.158                -7.75              -15.475               27.775               0.97
     Extraction
                           p-values                                  0.0002                < 0.0001              0.0625              0.0006               < 0.0001
        rate
                            Energy               88.23               0.61243               -2.6124                                                                              0.35
                           p-values                                  0.6075                 0.0472
                               R                 455.6               23.764                 13.896                 -30               21.247                -67.079              0.97
                           p-values                                  0.0006                 0.0184               0.0013              0.0011               < 0.0001
       Flour
                               E                 112.0               -9.7644               -2.8742                  4                                                           0.86
        With
                           p-values                                  1.0000                 0.0006               0.0004
        82%
                            R max                477.2               23.6471                14.368                 -25               28.824                -69.911              0.97
     Extraction
                           p-values                                  0.0005                 0.0154               0.0034              0.0002               < 0.0001
        rate
                            Energy               75.98               2.76471                0.1251                -0.25              -0.1780              -5.65728               0.8
                           p-values                                  0.0226                 0.9115               0.8618              0.8565                0.0030
A: Glucose oxidase; B: Ascorbic acid; R2: Regression coefficient; R: Resistance to extension; Rmax: Maximum resistance to extension; E: Elasticity.
P-value colors: P<.05 P>.05
                                                                                                                                                                                  003
 Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
 Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
Results and discussion                                                                  in flour with 75% extraction. Less than 100 mg/kg leads to a
                                                                                        decrease in the dough stability. Thus, finding the optimal dose
Resistance to extension of the flours with low extraction                               of ascorbic acid by Extensograph device at the laboratory before
rate                                                                                    adding it to flour by microfeeder at the product line is important
                                                                                        economically because adding values higher than optimal dose
    Resistance to extension (R-value) and the maximum                                   are not statistically significant. Ascorbic acid in the presence
resistance to extension (Rmax-value), characterize the force                            of oxygen and the ascorbic acid oxidase enzyme converts to
counteracting stretching so this factor indicates the strength of                       dehydroascorbic acid, which is the oxidative factor in the dough.
the dough (AACC-10-54, 2012). As shown by the results of the                            Ascorbic acid in the absence of oxygen acts as a reductive agent
Extensograph test in Table 1, the R-value and the Rmax-value                            and reduces the strength of the dough [6]. However, this study
of the control sample are 340 Bu and 362Bu (Brabender unit)                             showed that ascorbic acid acts as a reductive agent (at dosages
respectively, indicating a weak flour.                                                  less than 100 mg/kg) in the presence of glucose oxidase enzyme.
                                                                                        The reason can be attributed to the competition between
    Statistical analysis of the results showed that glucose                             glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid for oxygen consumption.
oxidase and ascorbic acid had a significant effect (p<0.05)                             Ascorbic acid cannot compete with glucose oxidase and behave
on this parameter, so a coded and graph model was obtained                              as a reductive agent in the dough at concentrations of less than
(Table 2, Figure 1a,b). According to Figure 1a and Figure 1b,                           100 mg/kg [7]. Increasing the dose of ascorbic acid (greater
the addition of ascorbic acid up to 100 mg/kg has reduced the                           than 100 mg/ kg) enhances its ability to compete with glucose
strength of the dough (R-value, Rmax value), while the values                           oxidase (Figure 1c). Hence, ascorbic acid is able to act as an
higher than 100 mg/kg are not statistically significant. This                           oxidative agent in the dough at doses above 100 mg/kg along
study showed that for increasing the dough stability, ascorbic                          with glucose oxidase. Reduction of glucose oxidase activity in
acid should be used in higher doses (more than 100 mg/kg)                               higher doses (Figure 1d), and the ascorbic acid beginning to act
A B
C D
Figure 1: Response surface graphs for flour with 75% extraction rate showing (a and b) the effect of glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid on the R and Rmax values,
respectively (c) the effect of one factor of AsA on the R-value (d) the effect of one factor of Go on the R-value.
AsA: Ascorbic Acid; GO: Glucose oxidase; R: Resistance to extension.
004
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
as an oxidative agent in the dough confirms the competition of                          of hemicellulose gel in the dough. This gel competes with the
these two factors in the dough.                                                         gluten network in absorbing water and prevents the formation
                                                                                        of the gluten network [14-16]. Thus, the addition of glucose
    Regarding the addition of the glucose oxidase enzyme,                               oxidase enzyme at low concentration in flours with an 82%
as shown in Figure 1a,b there is a direct correlation between                           extraction rate had low effect on the dough strength. This is
the level of glucose oxidase and the R-value, showing that an                           because the high extraction rate of flour lead to a high quantity
increase of the dose of glucose oxidase enhances the strength                           of pentosanes and frolic acid in response to high quantities of
of the dough. This is attributed to the formation of hydrogen                           bran in the flour [17]. In flours with a 75% extraction rate, the
peroxide as by-products of glucose oxidation due to the use of                          glucose oxidase had a significant effect at any concentration,
glucose oxidase [8,9], hydrogen peroxide are formed is unstable                         but in flours with 82% extraction rate, adding it had less of an
and rapidly converts to water and free radicals of oxygen. Free                         impact at doses lower than 20 mg/kg.
radicals of oxygen then form disulfide bonds between glutenin
and gliadin, thus increasing the strength of the dough [10].                                Another indirect effect of pentosans could be explained by
                                                                                        their ability to form a network that can limit the movement
    On the other hand, the subunits of glutenin are tyrosine-                           of glutenin. They connect to glutenin proteins covalently, thus
rich; these amino acids are catalyzed by peroxidases and                                hindering the formation of gluten [18]. At the concentration
participate in the formation of dityrosine [11]. Dityrosines are                        of higher than 20 mg/kg, glucose oxidase caused an increase
products of tyrosine oxidation that contribute to the structure                         in the stability of the dough (Figure 2c) due to overcoming the
of the gluten network and act as a kind of stabilizer in the                            formation of hemicellulose gels in response to the reduction of
gluten structure [11].                                                                  free pentosans in the dough [18].
    To enhance the stability of the flour with a 75% extraction                             There is an optimal dose of ascorbic acid to the flour with
rate, glucose oxidase has a greater effect than ascorbic                                82% extraction rate (Figure 2d). Doses less than 20 mg/kg can
acid. Also, according to the ANOVA, the effect of adding the                            increase dough strength. But at a concentration greater than
combination of the ascorbic acid and glucose oxidase in flour                           100 mg/kg (Figure 2d), ascorbic acid induced a decreased effect
with a 75% extraction rate was insignificant (p-value>0.05)                             on the dough stability. The reason attribute to the presence
(Table 2).                                                                              of the glucose oxidase enzyme. At low doses of ascorbic acid,
                                                                                        due to the lack of oxidative activity of glucose oxidase enzyme,
    Extensibility: Extensibility (E-value) showed the stretching                        ascorbic acid has no competitor and acts as an oxidizing agent
properties of the dough. Analysis of variance showed that there                         in the dough, but above 100 mg/kg, due to the activation of
was not a significant difference between the extensibility                              glucose oxidase, ascorbic acid becomes a reductive agent in
results of the different flours with a 75% extraction rate                              the dough. Glucose oxidase in high doses inhibits the activity
(P-value > 0.05) (Table 2).                                                             of ascorbic acid in the dough and ascorbic acid due to lack of
                                                                                        oxygen in the environment (consumption of oxygen by glucose
    Energy: The energy parameter describes the work applied                             oxidase) becomes a reductive agent and reduces the strength of
for stretching the dough. According to ANOVA, there was not a                           the dough [19].
significant difference between the energy results of the flours
with a 75% extraction rate (p-value>0.05) (Table 2).                                        The mechanism of ascorbic acid action in increasing dough
                                                                                        stability can be attributed to the presence of glutathione in
Extensograph parameter of the flour with a high extrac-                                 flour [19]. This attributes to the presence of glutathione in
tion rate                                                                               flour. Glutathione is a tripeptide composed of the three amino
                                                                                        acids glutamine, cysteine and, glycine. This tripeptide is
    Resistance to extension: The results in Table 1 show that the
                                                                                        naturally present in wheat flour. Glutathione attenuates the
R-value and Rmax values of the control sample are 245 BU and
                                                                                        gluten network due to the presence of a sulfhydryl bond on the
249 BU, respectively which indicates the weakness of the flour.
                                                                                        amino acid cysteine, as it normally tends to bind to the glutenin
Analysis variance of the results showed that glucose oxidase                            polymer [6,7]. Gluten, which is the principal protein in wheat
and ascorbic acid had a significant effect on these parameters.                         flour, is made up of two components, glutenin and gliadin. The
R-value and Rmax-value can be explained mathematically                                  polymer of glutenin and the monomer of gliadin form bonds
from the variation of ascorbic acid and glucose oxidase (Table                          through sulfur bonds in the structure of both components
2) and a response surface figure was obtained (Figure 2a,b).                            and form the gluten network [20]. The gluten network retain
According to Figure 2c, the addition of glucose oxidase to the                          the co2 formed as a result of fermentation, thereby creating
flour with an 82% extraction rate resulted in an increase in the                        a tender texture in wheat bread. Increasing the number of
dough stability at doses greater than 20 mg/kg. At doses lower                          bonds between glutenin and gliadin leads to the greater
than 20 mg/kg of glucose oxidase, changes in glucose oxidase                            strength of the gluten network [21]. Thus, any factor that
doses had no affect on the strength of the dough (Figure 2c).                           inhibits the binding of glutenin and gliadin weakens the gluten
This is possibly due to the flour with a high extraction rate,                          network. Ascorbic acid converts to dehydroascorbic acid in the
where hydrogen peroxide from the glucose oxidase oxidizes                               presence of oxygen and ascorbic acid oxidase enzyme, which
pentosanes instead of the gluten network [12,13]. Also, hydrogen                        oxidizes glutathione. In this way, it prevents the weakening
peroxide from the glucose oxide causes the formation of a bond                          of gluten indirectly [6]. However, the effect of ascorbic acid
between frolic acid and pentosanes, resulting in the formation                          is dose-dependent. At a concentration greater than 100 mg/
                                                                                                                                                                              005
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                     https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
     (e)                                                                                            (f )
Figure 2: Response surface graphs for flour with 82% extraction rate showing (a and b) the effect of glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid on the R and Rmax values,
respectively (c) the effect of one factor of AsA on the R-value (d) the effect of one factor of Go on the R-value (e and f) the effect of glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid on
the E and Energy values, respectively.
AsA: Ascorbic Acid; GO: Glucose oxidase; R: Resistance to extension; E: Elasticity.
kg, ascorbic acid induced a diminishing effect on the dough                                      Elasticity: The results of statistical analyses indicated that
stability. The reason for this is the activation of glucose oxidase                          ascorbic acid had a significant effect on dough elasticity, but
enzyme at higher concentrations. Glucose oxidase enzyme can                                  the addition of glucose oxidase had no significant effect on
limit ascorbic acid oxidative activity [6]. This is because, in the                          this parameter (Table 2). The elasticity of the dough would
presence of glucose oxidase due to the competition for oxygen                                diminish if ascorbic acid was used (Figure 2e). This is due to
consumption, ascorbic acid reacts as a reducing agent and                                    the reduction of sulfhydryl bonds due to the oxidizing effect
lowers the strength of the dough.                                                            of ascorbic acid because sulfhydryl bonds are one of the
006
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                     https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
factors that can increase dough extensibility [4,22]. Due to                                 of ascorbic acid in flours with a low extraction rate is minimal.
the formation of bonds between sulfhydryl and glutenin in                                    The concentration of glucose oxidase suggested is 15-30 mg/
the oxidation reaction, the number of sulfhydryl bonds in the                                kg.
dough decrease that result in the reduction of dough flexibility
                                                                                                 RSM method showed that the use of 23 mg/kg glucose
[23,24].
                                                                                             oxidase can create the highest dough strength and its use is
    Energy: Statistical analyses of energy indicated that only                               more economical than other formulations. This formulation
the addition of glucose oxidase affected this parameter (Table                               enhances the dough strength up to 711BU in comparison to
2). Figure 2f shows that the dough energy increased by adding                                the control sample with 340 BU. It would cause an acceptable
                                                                                             increase in the strength of the dough.
the glucose oxidase, which was due to the rise in the strength
of the dough. Analysis of variance showed that ascorbic acid did
                                                                                                 In the case of flour with 82% (Figure 3b) in order to achieve
not have a significant on this parameter.                                                    the highest dough strength, it is necessary to use the largest
                                                                                             dose of glucose oxidase enzyme while the concentration of
Optimization
                                                                                             ascorbic acid must be at least 90 mg/kg. Thus, in the flours with
    Selecting the optimal samples: Optimal samples were                                      a high extraction rate, the use of glucose oxidase at minimum
selected in both sets of flours based on the rheological results by                          dosages is not effective and causes a waste of resources.
RSM. Graphs of numerical optimization by RSM for flour with a
                                                                                                 According to the combination suggested by the response
75% extraction rate are presented in Figure 3a demonstrating
                                                                                             surface method, the most suitable and economical additive
that the maximum recommended dose for the use of ascorbic                                    is ascorbic acid and the optimal dose is 90 mg/kg, which
acid is 30 mg/kg, which is the minimum quantities in the range                               increased the maximum strength of the dough, in comparison
as recommended by the supplier. This indicates that the effect                               to the control sample with the dough strength of the 649 BU.
(a)
                    (b)
Figure 3: Graphs of numerical optimization for flour with 75% extraction rate (a) and for flour with 82% extraction rate (b).
                                                                                                                                                                                   007
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                         https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
     This study showed that the type of oxidative improver                                           The reason for the improved crumb color is the oxidation of
 for strengthening the gluten network is different for wheat                                      bread pigments due to hydrogen peroxide, which is produced
 flours with different extraction rates. At low extraction rates of                               by glucose oxidase [4]. The improvement of bread crumbs and
 flours, glucose oxidase was a more effective additive while at                                   their chewability is due to the increased retention of gases
 high extraction rates of flours, adding ascorbic acid was more                                   resulting from the activity of yeasts in the gluten network after
 economical as glucose oxidase should be used at higher doses                                     adding oxidative agents [26,27].
 (greater than 30 mg/kg). Further, since glucose oxidase is more
 expensive than ascorbic acid, it is not economical to add it at                                      However, according to the judges, if an oxidizer improver
 high doses to achieve the result ascorbic acid can produce.                                      is used, the symmetry of forms in both groups of the bread
 Thus, attention should be paid to the type of flour before using                                 samples, as well as the crust color of bread baked by the lower
 the improver. In this study, for the low extraction rate of flour,                               ash content flour, will decrease significantly (T-test, sig-value
 the best oxidative improver was glucose oxidase at 23 mg/kg.                                     0<0.05) compared to control. The negative viewpoint of judges
 On the other hand, for the high extraction rate of flour, it was                                 for symmetry of forms was due to the flinty crust of bread
 better to use 90 mg/kg ascorbic acid. After selecting the best                                   (crust breaks like an eggshell), which can be the result of using
 oxidative additives, the optimal oxidative dose was added to                                     too much oxidizing improvers [28,29].
 the high and low extraction rate flours separately, and after
 the bread baking process, the properties of the bread were                                          In the case of using bread with low ash, the color of the
 analyzed with results compared to the control bread.                                             bread crust was pale according to the judges. This color occurs
                                                                                                  due to the use of glucose oxidase enzyme, which leads to the
 Bread tests                                                                                      production of hydrogen peroxide.
                                Control
    Flours with 82%                                  2.5          0.45          59          70        74         76        83         67           61          69*          68          66
    extraction rate
                            90AsA (mg/kg)            2.9          0.51          65          76        59         66        69         74           67          71 *
                                                                                                                                                                            79          74
* Insignificant at the 0.05 level (T-test); Go: Glucose oxidase; AsA: Ascorbic Acid
008
 Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
 Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                    https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
taste. It also had a negative significant effect on the crust color                             wheat dough as affected by different concentrations of ascorbic acid. J Agric
                                                                                                Food Chem 51: 4948–4953. Link: https://bit.ly/3EMbbUs
and bread symmetry of form.
                                                                                            8. Decamps K, Joye IJ, Courtin CM, Delcour JA ( 2012) Glucose and pyranose
   In general, the total sensory evaluation scores of the bread                                oxidase improve bread dough stability. Journal of Cereal Science 55: 380-384.
with the improver were higher than those of the control bread                                  Link: https://bit.ly/332NM41
sample.
                                                                                            9. Tilley KA, Benjamin RF, Bagorogoza K, Okot-Kotber BM, Prakash O, et al.
Declarations                                                                                   (2001) Tyrosine crosslinks: Molecular basis of gluten structure and function.
                                                                                               J Agric Food Chem 49: 2627–2632. Link: https://bit.ly/3FX1Quu
    Availability of data and materials: The data that support
                                                                                            10. Pourmohammadi K, Abedi E (2021) Enzymatic modifications of gluten protein:
the findings of this study are available from the corresponding                                 Oxidative enzymes. Food Chemistry 356: 129679. Link: https://bit.ly/331RfQk
author, upon reasonable request.
                                                                                            11. Peña E, Bernardo A, Soler C, Jouve N (2006) Do tyrosine crosslinks contribute
    Authors’ contributions: All authors (Mahsa Shafiesoltani,                                   to the formation of the gluten network in common wheat (Triticumaestivum L)
Mania Salehifar and Saeed Baeghbali) have participated in                                       dough? Cereal Chemistry 80: 52–55. Link: https://bit.ly/3FWFyc0 .
(a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of                                12. Hoseney RC, Faubion JM (1981) A mechanism for the oxidative gelation of
the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for                                wheat flour water soluble pentosans. Cereal Chemistry 58: 421-424. Link:
important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final                                   https://bit.ly/32YvMYy
version.
                                                                                            13. Wang M, Hamer RJ, Van Vliet T, Oudgenoeg TG (2002) Interaction of water
                                                                                                extractable pentosans with gluten protein: Effect on dough properties and
    Research highlights:
                                                                                                gluten quality. Cereal Science 36: 25–37. Link: https://bit.ly/3t0hzFh
                                                                                            16. Maa BM, Suna QJ, Lia M, Zhub K (2020) Deterioration mechanisms of
        Ascorbic acid and glucose oxidase are dose-dependent
                                                                                                high-moisture wheat-based food – A review from physicochemical,
         improvers.                                                                             structural, and molecular perspectives. Food Chemistry 318: 126495. Link:
                                                                                                https://bit.ly/3Hvr1EE
Acknowledgment
                                                                                            17. Banu I, Georgeta S, Violeta I, Aprodu I (2012) Effect of the addition of bran
    This work was supported by the Ard Tak Karaj Company.                                       stream on dough rheology and bread quality. Food Technology 36: 39-52.
Thanks are due to the quality control unit of the mentioned                                     Link: https://bit.ly/3mUyCEX
company for their skillful assistance in testing the quality of
                                                                                            18. Wong C M, Wong K H, Chen X D ( 2008) Glucose oxidase: natural occurrence,
flours and enzymes activity.
                                                                                                function, properties and industrial applications. Applied Microbiology
                                                                                                Biotechnology 78: 927-938. Link: https://bit.ly/3mXfWnZ
References
                                                                                            19. Kornbrust B A, Forman T, Matveeva I (2012) 19 - Applications of enzymes in
1. Laskowski W, Górska-Warsewicz HRK, Czeczotko M, Zwolińska J (2019) How
                                                                                                Bread making. Bread making 470- 498. Link: https://bit.ly/3pRjSsf
   important are cereals and cereal products in the average polish diet? Nutrients
   11: 679. Link: https://bit.ly/3FUSL5k
                                                                                            20. Almeida EL, Chang YK ( 2012) Effect of the addition of enzymes on the quality
                                                                                                of frozen prebaked French bread substituted with whole wheat flour. LWT 49:
2. Baratto C, Becker NB, Neves Gelinski JML, Silveira SM (2016) Influence
                                                                                                64-72. Link: https://bit.ly/3FUSiQC
   of enzymes and ascorbic acid on dough rheology and wheat bread quality.
   African Journal of Biotechnology 15: 55-61. Link: https://bit.ly/3eM6PCj
                                                                                            21. Xu X, Luo Z, Yang Q, Xiao Z, Lu X ( 2019) Effect of quinoa flour on baking
                                                                                                performance, antioxidant properties and digestibility of wheat bread. Food
3. Kouassi-Koffi JD, Kouassi KH, Yapi A, Ahi AP, Muresan V, et al. (2015) Wheat
                                                                                                Chemistry 294: 87–95. Link: https://bit.ly/3FUSiA6
   bread dough rheological properties. Journal of Texture Study 46: 475-486.
                                                                                            22. Ooms N, Jansens KJA, Pareyt B, Reyniers S, Brijs K, et al. (2018) The
4. Kouassi-Koffi JD, Sturza A, Paucean A, Man S, Muresan AE, et al. (2019)
   Effect of glucose oxidase addition on the textural characteristics of                        impact of disulfide bond dynamics in wheat gluten protein on the
   wheat-maize dough and bread. Food Science and Technology 39. Link:                           development of fermented pastry crumb. Food Chemistry 242: 68-74. Link:
   https://bit.ly/3FXIJjO                                                                       https://bit.ly/3eTopUE
5. Khuri A , Mukhopadhyay S (2010) Response surface methodology. WIREs                      23. Dahiya S, Bajaj BK, Kumar A, Tiwari SK, Singh B ( 2020) A review on
   Computer Statistics 2: 128-149. Link: https://bit.ly/3pPCU2j                                 biotechnological potential of multifarious enzymes in bread making. Process
                                                                                                Biochemistry 99: 290–306. Link: https://bit.ly/3FWs3sV
6. Koehler P (2003) Effect of Ascorbic Acid in Dough: Reaction of oxidized
   glutathione with reactive thiol groups of wheat glutelin. J Agric Food Chem 51:          24. Steffolani ME, Ribotta PD, Pérez GT, León AE (2010) Effect of glucose oxidase,
   4954–4959. Link: https://bit.ly/3eToKXq                                                      transglutaminase, and pentosanase on wheat proteins: relationship with
                                                                                                dough properties and bread-making quality. Journal of Cereal Science 51: 366-
7. Koehler P (2003) Concentrations of low and high molecular weight thiols in                   373. Link: https://bit.ly/3sVeZAh
009
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137
                                                                   https://www.peertechzpublications.com/journals/international-journal-of-agricultural-science-and-food-technology
25. Shafisoltani M, Salehifar M, Hashemi M (2014) Effects of enzymatic treatment               historical and modern spring wheat. Cereal Chemistry 95: 226–238. Link:
    using Response surface methodology on the quality of bread flour. Food                     https://bit.ly/3zmS3eB
    Chem 148: 176-183. Link: https://bit.ly/3mTDni5
                                                                                           28. Miś A, Nawrocka A, Dariusz D (2016) Identification of baking expansion phases
26. da Silva CB, Almeida LE, Chang YK ( 2016) Interaction between xylanase,                    of leavened dough using an experimental approach. Food and Bioprocess
    glucose oxidase and ascorbic acid on the technological quality of whole wheat              Technology 9: 892–903. Link: https://bit.ly/3JAW0kJ
    bread. Food Technol 46: 2249-2256. Link: https://bit.ly/3mV5PQt
                                                                                           29. Ooms N, Delcour JA (2019) How to impact gluten protein network formation
27. Malalgoda M, Ohm JB, Meinhardt S, Simsek S ( 2018) Association between                     during wheat flour dough making. Current Opinion in Food Science 25: 88–97.
    gluten protein composition and breadmaking quality characteristics in                      Link: https://bit.ly/32NbEc2
010
Citation: Shafiesoltani M, Salehifar M, Baeghbali S (2022) Optimization of oxidative improver’s formulation for the wheat flours with different extraction rates. J
Agric Sc Food Technol 8(1): 001-010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000137