International Journal of Social Science And Human Research
ISSN(print): 2644-0679, ISSN(online): 2644-0695
Volume 02 Issue 01 November 2019
Page No.- 01-07
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based
Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in
Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
1
 Nwaokolo, B 2Adejoh, M. James, 3Okwara, O. Kalu.
1,2,3
        Department of Science Education Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Corresponding author: Nwaokolo
Department of Science Education Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
Abstract: This study was designed to determine the comparative effects of individualized and cooperative video – based
instructional strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria. Three
research questions were asked and three hypotheses were formulated and tested. The study adopted a quasi – experimental design
of non –randomized pretest posttest control group type. The population of the study is one thousand and seven (1,907) while the
sample of eighty four (84) SS1students was drawn from two secondary schools using multistage sampling technique. In each of
the schools intact classes were randomly assigned to individualized video – based instructional strategy and cooperative video –
based instructional strategy. The research instrument, Biology Achievement Test (BAT) was developed, validated by five experts,
trial-tested and used for the study. The reliability of BAT was calculated using Kuder-Richardson formula 21 (K-R21) and was
found to be 0.68. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions, while Analysis of covariance
(ANCOVA) was used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings reveal that individualized and cooperative
video – based instructional strategies are effective in improving students’ achievement in ecology. However, cooperative video –
based instructional strategy is more effective than individualized video – based instructional strategy. There is also statistically
significant difference between the mean scores of male and female students when taught ecological concepts using individualized
and cooperative video – based instructional strategies in favour of cooperative video-based instructional strategy. It was therefore
recommended that Biology teachers in secondary schools should adopt cooperative video –based instructional strategy for
teaching Biology.
Keywords: Cooperative, Individualized, Video Based, Instructional Strategies, Achievement.
Introduction                                                           In spite of the importance of the knowledge of Biology for
Biology is the life science that deals with the study of life. It      the socio-economic development of a country, achievement
refers to a combined set of life science dealing with                  in Biology at West African Examination Council (WAEC)
expansion, development, reaction, responses, reproduction,             which is offered by senior secondary school student has
and the interrelationship of living and non-living things in           been poor over the years. The implication of this failure in
our environment (Umar, 2011). The teaching and knowledge               education is that Nigeria is having a serious shortage of
of Biology equip students with the necessary skills that are           manpower in science and technology-related fields. This
useful in solving their day-to-day problem of life                     may affect Nigeria’s vision to become one of the 20
(Ityokyaa&Adejoh, 2014). The knowledge of Biology has                  industrialized nations in the world by the year 2020
contributed so much, by making life comfortable for people,            (Gambari, Yaki, Gana, &Ughovwa 2014).
promote health and control many diseases, increase in food                       This poor achievement could be attributed to a
production with the aid of genetic engineering (Eunice,                number of factors such as lack of school facilities, lack of
Khatet&Ondigi2014., Ityokyaa&Adejoh, 2014). Biology is                 qualified Biology teachers, Biology students’ negative
central to science and technology and it is indispensable in           attitude to Biology, Biology language difficulties, Biology
the fields of medicine, agriculture, brewery, petro-chemical,          teachers’ interpersonal behaviors in Biology classes, lack of
pharmacy, biochemistry, microbiology, and psychology                   Biology students’ motivation and interest, congested
among others (Umoke&Nwafor, 2014). It is obvious that no               Biology classroom, overloaded Biology syllabus and poor
student intending to study these disciplines can do without            instructional strategies used in teaching Biology (Kareem,
Biology.                                                               2003; Onwirhiren, 2005; Ahmed, 2008).
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019                  available at: www.ijsshr.in                                             Page 1
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
          Following the observed teaching and learning of         interest, motivate learners to learn, it brings the real world
Biology in Nigeria education that is mostly characterized by      experiences to the classrooms, and it conveys a sense of
the chalk and talk method of instruction which is ineffective     immediacy and feeling of participation (Chinna&
in giving students the opportunity to learn the useful skills     Dada,2013).
and the poor academic achievement in Biology, one                           The use of video-based instruction is relevant for
wonders if the high failure rate is not an indication of the      both homogenous and heterogeneous set of learners. This
instructional strategies used in the schools? If Biology          means that video gives students the opportunity to develop,
teaching and learning is not adequately assessed, and             interact and share their ideas with friends, which can be
reformed then it becomes doubtful if Nigeria will meet up         done through cooperative learning where a small group of
with its challenges of globalization (Ndirika&kanu, 2012).        students works together to achieve set goals and it can also
For instance, in the submission of Usman (2009); Duze             give the opportunity to students to learn at their own pace
(2011) and Yahaya (2012), the standard of education in            and thereby individualizing instruction.
Nigeria is declining.                                                       Therefore, individualized instructional strategy
          The declining rate of education, especially Biology     refers to those classroom practices of teaching which
education might hinder the achievement of its objectives.         recognize the uniqueness of each student’s learning.
The cardinal objectives of the Biology syllabus are to            Olatoye, Aderogba, &Aanu (2011) describe individualized
prepare pupils to acquire: adequate laboratory and field          instructional strategy as a method of instruction in which
skills, to ensure meaningful and relevant knowledge, to           content; instructional materials, and speed of learning are
inculcate the ability to apply scientific knowledge to            based upon the capabilities and interests of each learner.
everyday life in matters of personal and health and                         Nonetheless, cooperative learning contrasts
agriculture, and to inculcate reasonable and functional           individualized learning because student works together and
scientific attitudes. These objectives can be achieved or         are organized in small groups. Cooperative learning is an
hindered by the types of instructional strategies employed.       instructional strategy where students are organizes in to
Therefore, in order to achieve these objectives in the Senior     small groups of three to five members so that they can work
Secondary School level, very effective, motivating and            collectively to maximize their own and each other’s
interactive instructional strategies need to be employed.         learning. The small group is made up of heterogeneous
          In this 21st century where children live in a           groups of students working collectively to accomplish a
technological world, motivating and captivating strategies        common goal; this implies that, the group is made up of
should be encouraged. This will enable students to learn,         both male and female students.
understand Biology concepts and promote their                               Review of studies shows inconsistency on results
involvements in the teaching and learning process. Some of        of male and female students on achievement in Biology.
these promising instructional strategies are technological        Research reports are not explicit on the effect of gender on
ways of teaching using video-based instruction, cooperative       achievement. Gender is a concept used to distinguish
learning, and individualized instructional strategy among         femininity and masculinity from biological sex. It is said to
others.                                                           be one of the factors affecting students’ socio-cultural and
          Technological ways of teaching come in many             academic achievement. Zember&Blume (2011) report that
forms and is expanding rapidly in our nation and there is a       most studies indicated that female achieves better than male
push for schools to keep up with this technology. The use of      students in schools. Mobark (2014) found no significant
technology in secondary school is becoming significant            difference in academic performance of male and female
because it equips students with skills and prepares them for      students. Pandian (2004) reported that gender (male and
life in the real world (Perry, 2013). The benefit of using        female) in cooperative video – based instructional strategy
technology as stated by (Perry 2013; Okoyefi&Nzewi 2012)          improved higher than their counterpart. Orora, Keraro,
is as follows; Learning of Biology can be enhanced with           &Wachanga (2014), Nnorom (2015) whose results showed
images, video and sound; different types of learners can be       that the gender in experimental group improved in their
reached through the use of technology; it promotes students       achievement. Studies conducted on gender showed that
commitment to learning; it enhances motivation and interest       there are inconsistencies on the conclusions reached by the
and it makes Biology lessons more exciting.                       previous researchers. This study, therefore, inquires that if
          Technological ways of teaching Biology include          these strategies, individualized and cooperative video-based
video – based instruction (VBI), Computer- Assisted               were used, which of the gender would improve upon their
Instruction (CAI), multimedia instructional strategy (MIS)        achievement in Biology?
among others. The use of videos to instruct Biology in the
classroom is a step in the right direction toward                 Objectives of the Study
implementing and taking advantage of the available                The purpose of the study was to determine the comparative
technology (Perry, 2013). The use of video can stimulate          effects of using individualized and cooperative video based
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019              available at: www.ijsshr.in                                             Page 2
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
instructional strategies on secondary school students’             and 40 female students. A multi-stage sampling technique
achievement in Biology. The specific objectives were to;           was employed to select the sample for this study. Purposive
     1. determine the effect of individualized and                 sampling was used to select two schools from the twenty-
          cooperative video-based instructional strategies on      five schools. The schools were chosen based on the
          achievement scores of students in Biology.               following criteria; such as, they have at least one graduate
     2. determine the effect of individualized and                 teacher in Biology,they have computer that are made
          cooperative video-based instructional strategies on      available for students’ use,the students and teachers are
          male students achievement scores in Biology.             computer literate.
     3. determine the effect of individualized and                      From the purposive sampling that was carried out, only
          cooperative video-based instructional strategies on      four schools met the criteria. From the four schools that met
          female students achievement scores in Biology.           the criteria; two schools were randomly selected for the
                                                                   study. Also, using simple random sampling, intact classes in
Research Questions                                                 each of the two schools were randomly assigned to
 The following research questions were raised to guide the         individualized video-based instructional strategy and
study:                                                             cooperative video-based instructional strategies
    1. What are the mean achievement scores of students                 A researcher-constructed Biology Achievement Test
         taught Biology using individualized and                   (BAT) was used for data collection. The videos used are in
         cooperative video-based instructional strategies?         the form of educational video Package from YouTube and
    2. What are the mean achievement scores of male                were shown to students in addition to individualized and
         students taught Biology using individualized and          cooperative instructions. The package contained eight
         cooperative video-based instructional strategies?         lessons based on topics in ecology.
    3. What are the mean achievement scores of female                   The instrument was validated by two Biology educators
         students taught Biology using individualized and          and three experts in Measurement and Evaluation, Guidance
         cooperative video-based instructional strategies?         and counseling from University of Agriculture Makurdi,
                                                                   Benue State for face and content validity. A trial test was
Hypotheses                                                         carried out and analyzed using Kuder-Richardson 21
The following hypotheses were formulated for the study and         formula (K-R21). The reliability coefficient of the BAT was
tested at 0.05 level of significance:                              0.68.
 H01: There is no significant difference in the mean                    In order to effectively test the hypotheses for this study,
        achievement scores of students taught Biology using        BAT was administered in each of the two schools used for
        individualized video-based and cooperative video-          the study. The researcher and the research assistants
        based instructions.                                        administered the pretest (BAT) to all SS I Biology students
H02: There is no significance different in the mean                in the two schools before the treatments, thereafter, the two
achievement scores of male students taught Biology using           research assistants taught the ecology concepts. The
individualized and cooperative video-based instructional           teaching period lasted for four weeks after which a post-
strategies.                                                        BAT was administered.The mean and standard deviation of
H03: There is no significant difference in the mean                the students’ scores in the test was used to answer the
achievement scores of female students taught Biology using         research questions, to determine the level of observed
individualized and cooperative video-based instructional           differences while the hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of
strategies.                                                        significance using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Methodology                                                        Results
The study adopted a quasi-experimental of non-randomized           Research question 1: What are the mean achievement
pretest posttest control group, non-equivalent group design.       scores of students taught Biology using individualized
The study was carried out in Makurdi Local Government              video-based instruction (IVB) and cooperative video-based
Area of Benue State.                                               Instruction (CVB)? The answer to this question are
         The population of the study is 1,907 Senior               presented in Table 1
Secondary School I (SS I) students in Makurdi metropolis.
The sample of this study consist of 84 SS I students, 44 male
                                                           Table
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019              available at: www.ijsshr.in                                               Page 3
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
Table 1. Mean Achievement Score and Standard Deviation of Students Taught Using                         IVB and CVB Instructional
Strategies
Group                             N             Pre-BAT               Post-BAT          Mean gain
                                                X          S.D   X S.D
Individualized
Video-Based Instruction         47      17.06     4.04        21.15            4.27            4.09
Cooperative
Video-Based Instruction     37        19.83   3.40          27.05            5.60     7.22
Mean diff.                               2.77                  5.90                     3.13
Total                           84
        In Table 1, the mean post BAT of individualized                  Hypothesis 1: There is no significant difference in the mean
video – based group is 21.15with a standard deviation of                 achievement scores of students taught Biology using
4.27, while the mean post BAT for cooperative video –                    individualized video-based instruction and cooperative
based group is 27.05 with a standard deviation of 5.60.                  video-based instruction. The result to this hypothesis is
                                                                         presented in Table 2
Table 2: Result of ANCOVA on Achievement              Scores for Students Taught Ecology Using IVB and CVB Instructional
Strategies.
Source              Type III Sum ofdf                 Mean Square        F              Sig.        Partial      Eta
                    Squares                                                                         Squared
Corrected Model 721.972a             2                360.986            14.874         .000        .269
Intercept           1936.369         1                1936.369           79.788         .000        .496
Pretest             .071             1                .071               .003           .957        .000
Groups              639.916          1                639.916            26.368         .000        .246
Error               1965.778         81               24.269
Total               50069.000        84
Corrected Total     2687.750         83
a. R Squared = .269 (Adjusted R Squared = .251)
         In Table 2, the significance value for achievement              Research Question 2: What are the mean achievement
score across the two instructional strategies is 0.00 which is           scores of male students taught Biology using individualized
less than the alpha value of 0.05 level of significance.                 and cooperative video-based instructional strategies? The
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.                              answer to this question is presented in Table 3
Table 3: Mean Achievement Scores and Standard Deviation of Male Students Taught With IVB and CVB Instructional
Strategies.
Gender                      N            Pre-BAT                Post-BAT     Mean gain
                            X          S.D            X S.D
IVB Strategy with Male           27      17.19       3.40        21.52        3.98      4.33
CVB Strategy with Male           17      20.59       4.03        28.47        6.32      8.08
Mean diff.                               3.40                    6.95                  3.75
Total                           44
         In Table 3, the means post BAT for individualized               Hypothesis 2: There is no significance different in the mean
video – based male students is 21.52 with a standard                     achievement scores of male students taught Biology using
deviation of 3.98 while the mean post BAT scores for                     individualized and cooperative video-based instructional
cooperative video – based male students is 28.47,with a                  strategies. The result of this hypothesis is presented in Table
standard deviation of 6.32 . The mean difference between                 4
both groups is 6.95 and the mean gain is 3.75 in favour of
CVB.
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019                  available at: www.ijsshr.in                                                 Page 4
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
Table 4: Result of ANCOVA of Achievement Scores for Male Students Taught Ecology Using IVB and CVB Instructional
Strategies
Source               Type III Sum ofdf               Mean Square           F                 Sig.    Partial     Eta
                     Squares                                                                         Squared
Corrected Model 553.197a             2               276.598               11.318            .000    .356
Intercept           570.085          1               570.085               23.328            .000    .363
Pretest             49.014           1               49.014                2.006             .164    .047
Gender              303.334          1               303.334               12.412            .001    .232
Error               1001.962         41              24.438
Total               27333.000        44
Corrected Total     1555.159         43
a. R Squared = .356 (Adjusted R Squared = .324)
         In Table 4, the sig value for both individualized                 Research Question 3: What are the mean achievement
and cooperative video-based instructional strategies male                  scores of female students taught Biology using both
students is 0.001. Since this value is less than the alpha                 individualized and cooperative video-based instructional
value of 0.05 level of significance, the null hypothesis is not            strategies? The answer to the this research question is
accepted.                                                                  presented in Table 5
Table 5: Mean Achievement Scores and Standard Deviation of Female Students Taught Using IVB and CVB Instructional
Strategies
Gender                              N          Pre-BAT                            Post-BAT          Mean gain
                         X       S.D                   X S.D
IVB Strategy with Female
Students                20    16.90     4.80               20.65          4.68        3.75
CVB Strategy with Female
Students                   20     19.20     2.71                  25.80        4.80      6.60
Mean diff.                        3.30                            5.15                   2.85
Total                      40
         In Table 5, the mean post BAT scores for                          Hypothesis 3: There is no significant difference in the mean
individualized video – based female students is 20.65 with a               achievement scores of female students taught Biology using
standard deviation of 4.68, while the means post BAT of                    both individualized and          cooperative video-based
cooperative video – based female students is 25.80 with a                  instructional strategies. The result of this hypothesis is
standard deviation of 4.80. The mean difference score of                   presented in Table 6
both groups is 5.16 and the mean gain for both group is
2.85.
Table 6: Result of ANCOVA of Achievement Scores for Female Students Taught Ecology Using IVB and CVB
Instructional Strategies
Source              Type III Sum ofdf           Mean Square F         Sig. Partial   Eta
                    Squares                                                Squared
Corrected Model 267.438a             2          133.719     5.810  .006    .239
Intercept           846.219          1          846.219     36.769 .000    .498
Pretest             2.213            1          2.213       .096   .758    .003
Gender              230.227          1          230.227     10.004 .003    .213
Error               851.537          37         23.015
Total               22695.000        40
Corrected Total     1118.975         39
a. R Squared = .239 (Adjusted R Squared = .198)
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019                available at: www.ijsshr.in                                                  Page 5
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
          Table 6 revealed that the sig value for both             female students taught Biology using individualized and
individualized and cooperative video-based instructional           cooperative video – based.
strategies female students is 0.003 which is less than the         These finding implies that both gender (male and female) in
alpha value of 0.05 level of significance; the null hypothesis     cooperative video – based instructional strategy achieved
is therefore not accepted.                                         higher than the gender in individualized video – based
                                                                   instructional strategy. This finding is similar to the finding
Discussion                                                         of several other studies that have investigated the effect of
The data presented in Table 1 provided answer to research          gender on achievement of male and female students in
question one. The finding revealed that individualized and         science (Biology inclusive) and other fields. For instance,
cooperative video – based instructional strategies are             Pandian (2004) reported that gender (male and female) in
effective for improving students’ achievement, but                 cooperative video – based instructional strategy improved
cooperative video – based instructional strategy was more          higher than their counterpart. This finding is similar to that
effective. The reason for the effectiveness of both                of Sani (2015), Ororaet al. (2014), Nnorom (2015) whose
individualized and cooperative video – based instructional         results showed that the gender in experimental group
strategies may be due to the video that the students are           improved in their achievement. Hence, these findings
exposes to which is one of the technological ways of               confirmed that when male and female students are exposed
instruction. Videos can motivate and enhance engagement            to innovative instructional strategies like cooperative video
of students thereby improving meaningful learning and              – based instructional strategy, under the same environmental
achievement in Biology. This is in line with the finding of        conditions and taught by the same teacher, their academic
perry, (2013) which reported that learning of Biology can be       achievement will not differ significantly.
enhanced with video.
          Analysis of covariance was used to test hypothesis       Conclusion
one, Table 2, F – calculated value for treatment was 26.368,       The following conclusions were arrived at based on the
a significance of 0 .000 at 0.05 level of confidence was           findings of the study:
obtained. This confirmed that there is a significant                1. The findings of this study provided another empirical
difference between the mean scores of students taught using              evidence that cooperative video – based instructional
individualized video – based instruction and those taught                strategy enhances students’ achievement. The study
using cooperative video – based instruction. The finding is              found out that cooperative video – based instructional
in agreement with the report of Gambariet al, (2013) which               strategy is more effective in improving students’
states that cooperative video – based instruction enhanced               achievement in ecology concept than individualized
students’ achievement compared to individualized video –                 video – based instructional strategy.
based instruction in mathematics                                    2. The study also revealed that male and female taught
          The answer to research question two was provided               ecology using cooperative video – based instructional
by Table 3. The finding revealed that the mean achievement               strategy achieved higher than the male and female
score of male students taught using cooperative video –                  taught ecology using individualized video – based
based was higher compared with the male students taught                  instructional strategy. Therefore, the effectiveness of
using individualized video – based instruction. At the same              cooperative video – based instructional strategy on
time, analysis of covariance was employed for testing                    students’ achievement in ecology does not depend on
hypothesis two in table four. The F – calculated value for               gender. Students recorded higher achievement in
gender was 12.412 with a significance of 0.001 at a level of             ecology concepts when cooperative video – based
significance of 0.05 confirming that there is significance               instructional strategy was used for instruction
different in the mean achievement scores of male students                irrespective of gender. This result therefore shows that
when taught Biology using individualized and cooperative                 cooperative video – based instructional strategy is a
video – based. Similarly, the answer to research question                gender friendly instructional strategy for teaching
three was provided by table five. The finding also revealed              Biology.
that the mean achievement score of female students taught
with cooperative video – based was higher compare to               Recommendations
female student taught with individualized video – based. At        The following recommendations were made based on the
the same time, analysis of covariance was employed for             findings of the study
testing hypothesis three in Table six. The F – calculated           1. Biology teachers should adopt cooperative video –
value for groups was 10.004 with significance of 0.003 at a              based instructional strategy for teaching Biology in
level of confidence of 0.05, confirming that there is                    order to encourage social interaction, active
significant difference in the mean achievement scores of                 engagement and self-motivation among learners.
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019               available at: www.ijsshr.in                                             Page 6
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
2.   Curriculum planners should consider incorporating                     Nigeria, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of
     cooperative video – based instructional strategy into                 Education, University of Ilorin.3-5.
     Biology curriculum for teaching Biology when next               11.   Mobark, W. M. (2014). The effect of using
     they are reviewing the curriculum.                                    cooperative learning strategy on graduate students’
                                                                           academic performance and gender differences.
REFERENCES                                                                 Journal of Education and Practice, 5(11): 10 - 17
   1. Afe, J. O. (2001). Reflections on becoming a                   12.   Ndirika, M. C. &Kanu, N. E. (2012). Availability
       teacher and the challenges of teaching education.                   and utilization of information and communication
       Inaugural lecture series 64. Benin City. University                 technology infrastructure among secondary
       of Benin, Nigeria.                                                  teachers in Umuahia education zone, Abia state,
   2. Ahmed, M. A. (2008). Influence of personality                        Nigeria. In Abonyi O. (Ed.).53rd Annual
       factors on biology lecturers’ assessment of                         Conference of STAN on Meeting the challenges of
       difficulty levels of genetics concept in Nigerian                   UBE Through STM Education,284 –289.
       colleges of education Unpublished Doctoral Thesis,            13.   Nwachukwu, P. O. (2014). Effects of
       Department of Science Education, University of                      individualized and cooperative learning strategies
       Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.                                            on performance of students in economics in Lagos
   3. Akiri, A.A. (2013). Effects of Teachers                              State Journal of Education and Practice, 5(20): 60
       Effectiveness on students Academic performance                      – 65.
       in public secondary schools, Delta State, Nigeria             14.   Ofoegbu, F. I. (2004). Teacher motivation: A factor
       journal of Educational and social Research meser                    for     classroom    effectiveness    and     school
       Publishing, Rome-Italy, 3 (3): 105-111.                             improvement in Nigeria. Gate Group. Retrieved
   4. Chinna, N. C. & Dada, M. G. (2013).Effects of                        March 20, 2016, from http:www.findarticles.com.
       developed electronic instructional medium on                  15.   Okoyefi, Q. O. &Nzewi, U. M. (2012).Assessment
       students’ achievement in Biology. Journal of                        of ICT competence possessed by Biology teachers
       Education and Learning, 2(2): 1 – 7.                                in Nsukka education zone. In O. Abonyi (Ed.),53rd
   5. Duze, C. (2011). Falling Standard in Nigeria                         Annual Conference of STAN on Meeting the
       Education: Traceable to proper skills acquisition in                challenges of UBE Through STM Education.(300 –
       school? Retrieved on 26/8/2016                                      306)
       http://interestjournals.org/ER/pdf/2011/January/Du            16.   Olatoye, R. A., Aderogba, A. A. &Aanu, E. M.
       ze/pdf.                                                             (2011). Effect of cooperative and individualized
   6. Eunice, O.A., Khatete, D.W. &Ondigi, S.R.                            teaching methods on senior secondary school
       (2014).Pedagogical       Practices   that   Hampor                  students’ achievement in Organic Chemistry: The
       Effective Teaching and Learning of Biology in                       pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 12(2):
       Secondary Schools in Migori District, Kenye North                   310 – 319.
       American Open Educational Research Journal.1                  17.   Omiola, M. A., Enuwa, M. R., Awoyemi, S. O.
       (1). 1-12.                                                          &Bada, A. A. (2012).Effect of developed video
   7. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2014).National Policy                   instructional package on the performance of senior
       on education. Lagos: Federal Republic of Nigeria                    secondary school Physics students in Ilorin
       NERDC Press.                                                        Metropolis. British Journal of Science, 6(1): 45 –
   8. Gambari, A. I., Yaki, A. A., Gana, E. S.                             53.
       &Ughovwa, Q. E. (2014).Effects of video-based                 18.   Onwirhiren, E. M. (2005). The effects of class size
       multimedia instruction on secondary school                          and gender on academic performance in chemistry
       students’ achievement and retention in biology. A                   at post-secondary levels.Nigeria Journal of
       Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9(1): 78 – 91.                       Professional Teachers, 1(1): 146 – 150.
   9. Ityokyaa, F.M. &Adejoh, M.J. (2014). Opinions of               19.   Pandian, S. S. (2004). Cooperative learning in
       Biology Teachers on challenges confronting the                      biology: The effect of computers. Department of
       implementation of Biology programme in                              Education, Arunachi University, India.9-11.
       secondary schools in Benue State. Africa journal of           20.   Perry, M.J.M. (2013). Effects of visual media on
       Arts, Science and Educational issues (AJASEI).                      achievement and attitude in a secondary Biology
       2(1): 125-131.                                                      classroom. A master’s Research Project Presented
   10. Kareem, L. O. (2003). Effects of audio-graphic                      to the Faculty of the Patton, College of Education
       self-instructional packages on senior secondary                     and Human Services, Ohio University.112-119.
       school students’ performance in biology in Ilorin,            21.   Umar, A. A. (2011). Effects of biology practical
                                                                           activities on students’ process skill acquisition in
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019             available at: www.ijsshr.in                                             Page 7
Comparative Effects of Individualized and Cooperative video-Based Instructional Strategies on Secondary School Students’
Achievement in Biology in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
          Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. Journal of Science,
          Technology, Mathematics and Education.7(2): 118
          – 126.
    22.   Umoke, J. C. &Nwafor, C. C. (2014).Effects of
          instructional simulation on secondary school
          students’ achievement in biology. Journal of
          Education and Practice, 5(19): 34 – 40.
    23.   Usman, A. M. (2009). Viscon 20: 2020 and the
          falling standard of education in Nigeria. Retrieved
          on 26/8/16 from
          http://sundaytrust.com.ng/index.php?option=comco
          ntent&view= article&id=495:vision-202020-and-
          the-falling-standard-ofeducation-in-
          nigeria&catid=7:comment-a-debate&itemid=113.
    24.   Yahaya, H. (2012). Nigeria: Cleric decries low
          standard of education in Nigeria. Retrieved on
          26/8/16 from
           http://allafrica.com/stories/201208060693
    25.   Zember, L.B. &Blume, L. B. (2011).Gender &
          academic
          achievement.www.education.com/reference/article/
          gendertoacademytoachievement/retrievedon20th/M
          ay/2015
IJSSHR, Volume 2 issue 1 Nov. 2019               available at: www.ijsshr.in                                    Page 8