Problem and Its Presence:
Crime in Dallas, Texas, has been a persistent issue, with violent crime rates above the national
average. Gun violence, theft, and gang-related activities create an unsafe environment for
residents and businesses. This problem needs urgent attention because it affects public safety,
economic growth, and overall quality of life. If left unaddressed, crime can deter investments,
weaken communities, and strain law enforcement resources.
Target Audience:
The intended audience for this proposal is the Dallas City Council and the Dallas Police
Department. These decision-making bodies have the financial resources and legislative authority
to implement policies that can reduce crime. The City Council controls budgeting and
community programs, while the police department oversees law enforcement initiatives. Both
entities prioritize public safety and have a vested interest in reducing crime to enhance the city's
reputation and livability.
Genre:
This proposal will be presented in the form of a memo. A memo is the best format because it is a
direct, professional, and concise way to communicate policy recommendations to government
officials. It allows for a structured presentation of the problem, solution, and supporting
evidence.
Alternative Solutions and Drawbacks:
Increased Police Presence – While hiring more officers may seem like an effective deterrent, it is
costly and does not necessarily address the root causes of crime. Studies show that an over-
reliance on policing without community engagement can create distrust between law
enforcement and residents (Gill et al., 2014).
Curfews and Strict Laws – Some cities have implemented curfews for minors and stricter laws
against petty crimes, but these measures often lead to high incarceration rates and
disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Additionally, curfews are difficult to
enforce on a large scale (Braga & Weisburd, 2012).
The Best Solution:
A Community-Based Crime Reduction Program that integrates law enforcement with social
services, youth engagement initiatives, and neighborhood watch groups. This solution is both
logical and feasible because it directly addresses crime at the community level while fostering
trust between residents and law enforcement. The plan includes:
Establishing community policing units that collaborate with local organizations.
Implementing after-school programs to engage at-risk youth in productive activities.
Expanding mental health and substance abuse services to address underlying causes of
criminal behavior.
Enhancing street lighting and surveillance in high-crime areas.
Justification for the Best Solution:
Community Trust and Cooperation – Research shows that community-based policing
leads to lower crime rates because residents are more likely to report suspicious activity
when they trust law enforcement (Ekici et al., 2022).
Prevention Through Youth Engagement – Studies indicate that investing in after-school
programs reduces juvenile crime rates by keeping young people engaged in positive
activities (National Institute of Justice, 2023).
Addressing Root Causes – Many crimes are linked to substance abuse and mental health
issues. Providing access to treatment can reduce repeat offenses.
Counter-Arguments and Rebuttal:
"Community programs are expensive and require ongoing funding."
Rebuttal: While initial costs may be high, long-term benefits such as lower incarceration rates
and reduced law enforcement expenditures outweigh the costs. Federal grants and private sector
partnerships can help fund these initiatives.
"Crime is a policing issue, not a social issue."
Rebuttal: Studies have consistently shown that addressing social determinants of crime—such as
poverty, lack of education, and mental health—leads to sustainable reductions in criminal
activity.
Additional Counterarguments:
AI-generated insights suggest skepticism about program effectiveness or concerns about
potential misuse of resources. Research into successful programs in cities like New York and Los
Angeles could provide further evidence to counter these objections.
Concluding Call to Action:
To persuade decision-makers, the proposal will use data-driven arguments, testimonials from
experts, and success stories from other cities. A compelling narrative will emphasize how this
initiative will improve public safety, enhance community relationships, and foster economic
growth in Dallas.
Thesis
The City of Dallas should implement a Community-Based Crime Reduction Program that
combines law enforcement, youth engagement, and social services to effectively reduce crime
rates, foster community trust, and create a safer, more prosperous city.
Supplementary Research:
Ekici, N., Akdogan, H., Kelly, R., & Gultekin, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of
community policing on crime reduction. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 7(3),
111–121. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.244
This study provides statistical evidence of how community policing strategies reduce various
types of crime.
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented
policing to reduce crime, disorder, and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among
citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of
community-oriented policing (COP) strategies in reducing crime and improving public
Plan for the Advocacy Ad or PSA
I will plan for a video PSA aimed at Dallas residents and policymakers, showcasing real-life
testimonials from communities that have benefited from similar programs. Further,AI
Component: Tools like Canva (which integrates AI-generated visuals) and Adobe Premiere Pro
for video editing will be used. AI can assist in generating infographics and enhancing visuals but
will be combined with human creativity for an effective message.
References:
Ekici, N., Akdogan, H., Kelly, R., & Gultekin, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of
community policing on crime reduction. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being,
7(3), 111–121.\
https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.244
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented
policing to reduce crime, disorder, and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among
citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Methodological%20quality%20and
%20the%20evaluation%20of%20anticrime%20programs&journal=Journal%20of
%20Experimental%20Criminology&doi=10.1007%2Fs11292-006-9012
y&volume=2&issue=3&pages=329337&publication_year=2006&author=Farrington%2C
P#d=gs_cit&t=1739514585136&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3A7rvrNjxSeTwJ
%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl
%3Den:~:text=Farrington%2C%20D.%20P.%20(2006).%20Methodological%20quality
%20and%20the%20evaluation%20of%20anti%2Dcrime%20programs.%20Journal
%20of%20Experimental%20Criminology%2C%202%2C%20329%2D337.
