Bull. Mater. Sci., Vol. 13, Nos. 1 & 2, March 1990, pp. 99-112. © Printed in India.
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes
O P DAGA, J K SINGH, B R SINGH, H S KOTHARI and
W S KHOKLE
Semiconductor Devices Area, Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute,
Pilani 333 031, India
Abstract. Since inception of GaAs MESFET in 1971, growth and processing technology
of GaAs has matured to the extent that the analogue as well as digital IC production is
persued at the industrial level. The ever increasing demand for higher frequency of
operation, low noise figure and higher gain has led to newer device structures such as
HEMT and HJBT based on GaAs and related compounds. Furthermore there exists
exciting and proven capabilities in GaAs and related compounds to generate, detect and
convert light into electrical signals. This has opened up vast field of opto-electronic devices
and their integration with MESFET and other conventional devices.
Basic building block of all these developmental activities still remains the GaAs
MESFET, which have also been extensively used as low noise amplifiers, mixers,
oscillators and high power amplifiers in descrete form. This paper reviews the design
aspects, fabrication technology, d.c. and microwave characterization for both low noise
and high power MESFET.
Various technological advancements like via-hole for source grounding, air-bridge
technology for low parasitic interconnects and polymide passivation, which have helped in
further improvement in terms of higher frequency of operation, low noise and high power
output are reviewed.
Finally some representative results on the devices fabricated at CEERI are also
presented.
Keywords. GaAs devices; GaAs technology; MESFET.
1. Introduction
The inherently superior electronic properties of GaAs material coupled with recent
advances in material and process technologies have opened up a vast field of GaAs-
based discrete devices for low noise and high power microwave applications, high
speed digital and analogue integrated circuits (IC) and integrated optoelectronic
circuits (IOEC). In particular, the GaAs metal semiconductor field effect
transistors (MESFET) have made a major impact on a wide range of microwave
components by virtue of their very low noise figures and high associated gains.
Whereas low-noise FET are already invading the 30 GHz range with noise figures
as low as 3dB or less, power FET have started replacing costly and bulky
parametric amplifiers and low power travelling wave tube (TWT) (Dilorenzo and
Khandelwal 1982; Nogami et al 1982: Kim et al 1987). However, high yield
reproducible fabrication methods and improved performance of the device are of
prime concern in satisfying the high demand for GaAs MESFET. Such an advance-
ment has been achieved by novel device structures in conjunction with the improved
quality of epitaxial material and related processes. For example, shortening the gate
length, introducing the gate recess structure, applying N + contact layers and use of
undoped buffer layers have resulted in the development of much improved low
noise, high frequency and high power GaAs MESFET.
In this paper, a brief review of the current status of GaAs MESFET including
99
100 0 P Daga et al
design considerations for both low noise and power FET, materials, fabrication
technology and characterization techniques are described.
2. Current status
Figures 1, 2 and 3 represent the state-of-the art results in low noise and power FET
respectively. It is apparent from figure 1 that the submicron gate length GaAs
MESFET with appropriately scaled unit gate width have superior noise figures at
microwave frequencies through the K-band. However, the low noise scene has
considerably changed since the emergence of high electron mobility transistor
(HEMT) devices. Around 2dB noise figures have been measured at 40 GHz (Berenz
1985) and the high frequency operation have been pushed to 60 GHz (figure 1). The
state-of-art power FET are capable of giving 1 Watt of power output, at 28 GHz.
Figure 2 shows maximum power output as a function of frequency (W/mm). The
output power decreases as the frequency increases, the best reported value is
0"3 W/ram at 94 GHz. Figure 3 shows the maximum power output from a single
5 Gate length
J Nogami 0.25 O
_ J etal (19821 0 . 3 a
~4~ 0.5 • ,-_
- / 0.7 •
~/ 7 /o25,
o I : , ; ; ! ,I
2 4 10 20 40 60
Frequency I GHz}
Figure 1. C u r r e n t status of low noise G a A s F E T and H E M T ,
2~J
- Tt •
>~ 0 ' ~ - A MITSUBISHI
c O BELL LABS
13 • RAYTHEON
) LSI { J A P A N ~
@ HUGHES
~O 0 ' 2 - 0 GE O
0_
0,~ ..... L_ J__l I J-J~-][ ___L L ~ Li l_
2 ] 4 6 10 20 40 100
F r e q u e n c y I OHz)
Figure 2. Power density of G a A s M E S F E T at various operating frequencies.
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes 101
Po'r Z= CONSTANT
i \
\,o°° I
~ 6~- ~ ]
\
> ,oo. \ -!
= b \ -q
2~ t..Bmmi 6ram -}
I I
I l- A MITSUBISHI • • ~ -]
0.8 ~ /3 BILL LABS x \ 3-2ram
•k I FUJITSU ~ -~
°°l- ~REA k 7
o~ F ~.sc " ~
@HUGHES 1.3rnm " \ -i
02 L 0 t'mmX !
'
L
<> o J,,
0 "4ram#
x ',
01 - - - J L __ I I __La~_LL~__.__~' \X ,07 l~_l~J.---l-]
1 2 4 6 B 10 70 t,0 60
FRED,UENCY (Ghz)
Figure 3. Power output from a single F E T at various frequencies.
device. These results have been possible due to a number of improvements in
material and device technology and geometries.
3. Design considerations
3.1 Low-noise F E T
For low noise design, it is important to consider the major parasitic elements
associated with the FET for a particular device structure and optimise them. This is
crucial because material and layout parameters are directly related to the low noise
behaviour of this device. Specifically, the quality of the material at the
substrate/active layer interface, the gate length, the gate metal loss and source
resistance, all affect the noise performance of the FET. Figure 4 shows the major
parasitic elements associated with the recessed structure FET. The noise figure for
such a device structure is given as [Fukui 1979; DiLorenzo and Khandelwal 1982)
( N ) l r3"3_W2p W 2 / P f + -1"8
-
F o = l + k f L ~/6 a L hL t-0.6 k/hL N
(1)
102 0 P Da#a et al
Source Drain
L5[i2~
\°' ___t:
.HighRes. ./
Figure 4. Schematicdiagram of FET.
Source Gole Droin
77777~ ,~. F/TZ77,
~_~-~I N Loyer
Io I Buffer layer
FTZFZ?~
(b)
~////A 1I///////
(C I
Figure 5. Different types of FET-recessed channel structures.
Here, N is the carrier density in 1016 cm -3, W the gate width in mm, h the gate
metallization thickness (in microns), and p the gate metal resistivity in 10-6 ohm cm.
In (1) the terms I and II represent the noise contribution from the gate metal loss
and depend on gate length, unit gate width and conductivity and thickness of the
metal used. The most important factor influencing the noise behaviour of the FET
is the source series resistance which is represented by the term IlL Particularly for
conventional fiat-type FET structures, the source resistance is found to be nearly
double the expected value due to the surface depletion layer (DiLorenzo and
Khandelwal 1982). In fact, this causes the poor noise behaviour of such device
structures. Gate recessing combined with N ? contact layer considerably reduces
source resistance. The specific contact resistivity should be 10-s ohm cm 2 or less in
order to have negligible influence on noise behaviour.
Various recess structure as shown in figure 5 have also been tried to optimise
source resistance (Furutsuka et al 1978). The first two structures suffer from the
large gate-fringing capacitance and thin active layer which make it difficult to
reduce the source resistance effectively. In the channel structure shown in figure 5c,
there is a smooth change of the active layer and the source resistance is minimised
without increasing the gate-fringing capacitance. This structure is considered the
optimum recess structure for low noise applications.
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes 103
3.2 Power FET's
The maximum a.c. output power Pac of a MESFET operating in class A is given by
Pa.c. = 1/8IDss (BvDs -- VDSS), (2)
where IDSS is the full channel current, VDSSthe saturation voltage for the drain
current and BvDs the avalanche breakdown voltage between the drain and source.
To optimize the MESFET for higher power output, one has to maximize both
IDSS and BVDS. The simplest and most widely used method to increase IDSSis to
increase the gate width, which is achieved by connecting several gates in parallel.
However, an increase in gate width reduces the input impedance and oroblems of
matching with a 50-ohm microstrip have to be tackled.
A high source-drain breakdown is important not only for high power output but
also for the stable operation of the amplifier and preventing catastrophic device
burn-out. One way to improve BVDSis to include an N ÷ contact layer in the source
and drain regions either by epitaxial growth or by selective ion implantation. This
helps in reducing the electric field near the source and drain, leading to an increased
BVDS (Fukuta et al 1976). A similar effect has also been observed by forming a
smoothly recessed deep channel structure which helps in reducing the field at the
drain contact resulting in increase of breakdown voltage (Hasegawa et al 1978). One
simple way to achieve the same effect is to place the gate electrode near the source
together with gate recessing which helps in suppressing the localized electric fields
(Moncrief 1980).
Besides maximizing Bvos and loss, thermal design is most important in
improving the ultimate performance of the power FET. It is well-known that the
transistor transconductance g,, is an inverse function of absolute channel
temperature. The most important of the thermal effects are the thermally activated
failure mechanisms from the reliability point of view (DiLorenzo and Khandelwal
1982).
The parameters associated with thermal design are gate finger width, gate to gate
spacing, substrate thickness, heat sinks and mounting procedure. One of the most
popular method to optimize the thermal behaviour is through the use of the plated
integral heat sinks (Asaro et al 1978). In this procedure the source inductance could
also be reduced by allowing direct source grounding to the heat sink by a plated-
through hole. Another approach involves a flip chip bonding to the package heat
sink (Mitsui et al 1979).
Besides the above design considerations for a power FET, the standard design
equations from low-noise FET for current, cut off frequency ft, unilateral gain U
and stability factor K can be used for high frequency designs also.
Recent advances in GaAs power FET applications have reached amplifier
operations up to 60 GHz. As operational frequency increases, the required gate
length decreases. At these gate lengths active layer thicknesses also need to be
reduced to overcome short channel effects. Consequently a highly doped channel
layer is generally used to allow for high current modulation for power generation.
The resulting device has low breakdown voltage and tends to operate at low drain
bias voltage. Therefore output power per unit gate width decreases as operating
frequency increases.
104 0 P Daga et al
4. Technology
Defect-free GaAs material with uniform and desired doping levels and thickness
and sharp interfaces is essential for GaAs MESFET development. Normally
N +/N/N-/SI GaAs is used for both low noise and power FET fabrication. The N -
undoped buffer layer is just an extension of the SI GaAs substrate, which is used to
prevent adverse effects caused by Cr-diffusion in the active layer during growth and
also to preserve the sharpness of the carder profile. The buffer layer also helps in
preserving the high mobility fight up to the interface. Detailed specifications of the
various layers and their thickness ranges required are presented in table 1.
Normally all the three N ÷~N/N- layers are grown in situ using either VPE,
MOCVD or MBE techniques. Although all the three techniques are reported to
provide the desired uniformity of doping with accurate thickness control suitable
for FET development, only the vapour phase epitaxial proeess is commonly in use.
The MBE process provides well-controlled film thicknesses, sharp doping profiles,
good compositions and exceedingly smooth surfaces but it is a slow process and its
high cost restricts this technique for special applications. Direct ion implantation in
qualified SI substrates followed by passivation and annealing is also finding greater
use with competitive performances.
These layers are normally assessed for their suitability in low noise and power
FET fabdcation. Conventionally, test structures are used to evaluate the carrier
density profile using the C-V method, isolated pads for buffer layer resistivity with
and without illumination and Van der Pauw structures for mobility evaluations.
4.1 Fabrication of low-noise FET
The process flow charts for the fabrication of low noise recessed gate, self-aligned
flat type and power FET are illustrated in figure 6. After mesa etching, source and
drain contacts are formed by evaporating AuGe/Ni layers. Alloying of ohmic
contacts is usually performed at 460°C for a min in H z or N2 ambient. Recessing
of the channel region is done either by wet chemical or dry etching. Electron-beam
lithography followed by Schottky metal (AI or Ti/Pt/Au) evaporation and lift-off is
used for submicron gate fabrication. SiaN4/Silox/polyimide passivation and overlay
metallization of Ti/Pt/Au is used to improve the reliability and facilitate the
bonding of these devices.
In self-aligned flat-type FET fabrication, the tedius gate alignment between
source and drain is done automatically. For this, the hangover of the photoresist on
top of the Schottky metal or mushroom structure formed by electroplated gold
as Schottky metal contact, have been used for the formation of source and drain
contact. High temperature refractory Schottky metals have also been used for
fabricating self-aligned ion-implanted FET.
Table I.
Parameters N + contact layer N active layer N - buffer layer SI substrate
Carrier concentration 1018 c m -3 0"5 to 2 x 1017cm -3 1014 cm -3 < 1 x 107ohmcm
Resistivity
Thickness 0.1 to 4 0-2 to 0-5 2.5 to 0.5 350
(microns)
Dopant S or Si S None Cr/O/undoped
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes 105
Process Flow Chart
Low Noise FET's
I
High Power FET's
I
Self aligned structure Recessed gate structure Recessed gate structure
Isolation Isolation Isolation
Schottky metaHization S-D photolithography S-D photolithography
Photolithography and A[ Ohmic metallization and lift-off Ohmic metallization and lift-off
etching
Define gate length Gate photolithography (E- Gate photolithography (E-
beam) beam/projection)
Ohmic contact metallization Gate recessing Gate recessing
Lift-off and alloying Metallization and lift-off Metallization and lift-off
Define gate pads Passivation Passivation
Passivation Open windows Open windows
Open windows Overlay metallization Overlay metallization and lift-
off
Overlay metallization D.C. testing Photolithography
D.C. testing Chip seperation and bonding Inter connect metallization
Chip seperation and bonding Microwave testing D.C. testing
Back side thinning and polish-
ing via-holes (dry/wet etching)
Metallise back side
Plate integral heat sink
Chips seperation and bonding
Microwave testing
Figure 6. Process flow chart for various structures.
4.2 Fabrication of power F E T
It is clear from the flow chart (figure 6) that the fabrication steps for high power
FET require some additional steps to complete the processing. Power FET
structures can be broadly classified into two groups depending upon how the unit
cells are connected. The fabrication sequence up to the Schottky metal follow the
same routine as that of low-noise FET (figure 6). In a power FET structure,
crossover of interconnect metal is done using a dielectric layer as intermetal
isolation or the air-bridge technology (§6"1). Normally, plasma-enhanced
Si3N4/SiO 2 or an organic dielectric such as polyimide could be used as the dielectric
layer for intermetal isolation. Ti/Pt/Au(0"2/0"2/l'0#m) layers are used for
interconnecting the respective gate source and drain bus. The other type of power
FET structure uses wire bonding or flip chip configuration and connections via
holes.
After the epi-side fabrication is complete, the wafers are thinned from the
backside to obtain a final thickness of 50 to 100 #m. This is followed by Ti/Au
metallisation, which is further plated to form a 1 micron thick gold layer. In some
cases, source and substrate is connected through a via hole, formed as a part of
thinning and gold plating. However, significant improvement due to this process are
observable only beyond 7 GHz.
106 0 P Daga et al
5. DC and microwave characterisation of MESFET
Saturation current and transconductance provide useful information on carrier
density while pinch-off voltage provides qualitative information regarding active
layer thickness and its interface quality. Initially on a few samples, gate source
breakdown voltage and forward diode characteristics are also observed to check the
Schottky diode and related parameters.
Besides this, d.c. saturated and unsaturated transfer characteristics, contact
resistance etc. yield useful information on parasitic resistances. A detailed analysis
of these are presented in Fukui (1979).
For stable operation of power FET, the breakdown voltage between source and
drain is also of great importance; for C band operation this should be typically
around 20 volts.
The following measurements are needed for the microwave characterization of
FET (Camisa et al 1984).
i) S parameter measurements,
ii) noise figure measurements,
iii) maximum available gain measurements and
iv) power saturation measurements.
These measurements could be easily accomplished with a conventional set-up
using network analysers.
6. Recent technological developments
In this section, state-of-the-art processes presently in use abroad to further improve
the device performance are described.
6.1 Air bridge and via hole technology
In power FET and complex GaAs digital as well as analogue IC, parasitics
associated with the interconnection over the active channels of the FET become
substantial and limit the high frequency gain advantage of the device. Air bridge
and via-holes provide low parasitic interconnect capacitance and low inductance.
Typical fabrication steps for making plated air bridges and via-holes are shown
in figure 7. It is clear from the figure that air bridge technology requires two
levels of lithography followed by electroplating or sputtering and lift-off. For
via-hole fabrication, a conical etch profile is essential to connect the front side
layers. Although controlled chemical etching could be used for this purpose, ion
milling or laser techniques are preferred (Camisa et al 1984; Daga et al 1986).
6.2 Polyimide processes
Polyimide, an organic dielectric, having very good dielectric properties is finding
tremendous use in GaAs technology as a passivation layer for scratch protection
and also as a dielectric layer for intermetal isolation in power FET and IC. Low-
temperature processing and easy patterning are some of the advantages of this
process (Singh et al 1987).
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes I07
BACKSIDE
RESISr THIN METALLAYER RESIST
/ \ I .......... t.,
~ GaAs
METAL PADS GaAs
FRONT SIDEMETAL
i ky ...iETCHEDHOLE
........... ........
PLATED GOLD THIN METALCOATIND
i
AIR BRIDGE PLATED GOLD
I J
(a) (b)
Figure 7. Fabrication steps for (a) air-bridge and (b) via-holes.
Due to high band gap of GaAs as compared to silicon, GaAs devices are
preferred for high-temperature operating conditions. But degradation in the contact
metal system is a major drawback. Presently greater emphasis is laid on developing
high temperature contacts for GaAs material. Although refractory metals and their
silicides show stable Schottky contact up to 800°C on GaAs, various metal systems
are being investigated for ohmic contacts.
Due to the ever-increasing quest for high frequency operation for GaAs FET,
lithographic processes combined with lift-off are continuously being investigated.
Electron beam lithography combined with the multilevel resist system resulting in
high aspect ratios facilitates easy lift-off. The modification of the top photoresist
layer by some chemical treatment to obtain the desired resist profile for easy lift-off
is also being attempted.
7. W o r k at C E E R I
For the last 8 years a small group of researchers are pursuing investigations on
GaAs MESFET which has now been extended to digital as well as Monolithic
Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMIC). At CEERI, both recessed gate and self-
aligned low noise FET having gate lengths 2 pm and 1"25#m, respectively, on
epitaxial and ion implanted material have already been d~veloped. Figure 8 shows
the cross-sectional view of the process steps followed for their development. The
DC characteristics of various types of FET developed are illustrated in figures 9
and I0. Packaged devices have been tested for their microwave performance and
showed a gain of 7"5 dB with noise figures of around 3 dB (Daga et al 1985).
Most of the state-of-the-art processes such as the air bridge and via-hole
technology (Singh et al 1988), rapid thermal annealing for implanted layer
activation, and polyimide processing for intermetal isolation, have been
108 0 P Daoa et al
Ohmic rueful
/ N%
~-': ~:':":'J ~ . ' " ~ ................... ~ At
(o)
Photo-resist
~ =~J~l+Ph°t° T
(b)
Gate metal
lllij~l~)l~l~i~ A u Ge * N i
(c)
Source Drain
G a t e
Lift-off ~ ....... ~
(A) (B)
Figure 8. Process steps of the (A) recessed gate structure and (B) self-aligned GaAs
MESFET.
Figure 9. DC characteristics of the devices fabricated at CEERI, recessed gate structure
(Ids -~20 mA; gm >! 12 m mho; L = 2 #m).
standardized and presently are being incorporated in power FET, and IC
development programmes.
The process followed for the development of air bridge and via-hole techno-
logy is illustrated in figure 7. For optimising the process and acquiring design
GaAs M E S F E T and related processes 109
Figure 10. Self-aligned (Epi). x - 05 V/step, y - 5 mA/step, VG-0.5 V/step, Ids >>35
- mA,
9m~>20 m mho and L = 125 to 1.5/~m.
Table 2. Optimum 1/w ratio for different
widths of air bridges.
Width (microns) Optimum 1/w
15 11
30 5
17 2-5
87 2-0
120 1"5
data base at CEERI, bridges of different dimensions from 15×70#m 2 to
80 x 280/tm 2 were fabricated. The optimum l/w ratio has been found to decrease with
increase in the widths of air bridges (table 2). This implies that air bridges of smaller
widths should be used to connect larger distances before a post is required (Singh et
al 1988). Figure 11 shows the photomicrograph of a typical air-bridge fabricated at
CEERI.
Figure 12 shows the micrograph of vias of different dimensions etched
simultaneously on a single chip using the wet-etching technique. It has been
observed that apart from etch rate, etching behaviour strongly depends upon the
temperature of the etchant. In addition, magnetic stirring and angular rotation of
the substrate during etching has helped us in fabricating via-holes of the order of
15 x 15/~m2. Incidentally, the damage introduced to the chip during the thinning
process has been found to severely restrict the etching.
In the polyimide process (Singh et al 1987), optimisation for obtaining excellent
110 0 P Daga et al
Figure 11. Photomicrograph showing via holes of different dimensions on a single chip.
Figure 12. Typical SEM photograph of an air-bridge.
GaAs MESFET and related processes 111
insulating properties with breakdown strengths of 2 MV/cm, degrees of planarization
of about 58%, fine line patterning ability with sloped vias of 45 ° to 60 ° have been
carried out. Figure 13 shows taper angle of sloped vias obtained under different
imidisati.on conditions. Statistical distribution of breakdown field strengths of
polyimide layers having different thicknesses is illustrated in figure 14. Various
temperature cycles for rapid thermal annealing for the activation of implanted
impurities have been tried. Activation of about 70 to 80% with good surface
morphology and mobility has been achieved.
Our present emphasis at CEERI has been to establish GaAs low noise, power
FET and IC technology incorporating the above mentioned state-of-the-art unit
processes for microwave applications and '~o provide fabrication support to various
microwave systems groups within the country for their design verification and
applications.
b)
Figure 13. Dependence of taper angle of sloped-edged vias with polyimide film
preparation conditions. Imidisation 80%; dilution, (a) l : l , 45 °, (b) 1:2, 60 °.
(a) (b)
400
r,
200
d
z
0 J
I-O 2.0 3.0 0,2 0 , 4 0-~ O,
Breokdown field ~xlO6V/cm ~
Figure 14. Statistical distribution of dielectric breakdown field strength of polyimides.
(a) Thickness, ! pm and (b) 0,4 ~rn,
112 0 P Daga et al
8. Conclusion
In this paper we have reviewed the current status and technology of GaAs
MESFET for low noise and high power microwave applications. The status of
GaAs MESFET technology and several state-of-the-art unit processes being
developed at CEERI are also included. It can be seen that over the past several
years, GaAs MESFET technology has matured to the extent that various
fabrication houses abroad are offering foundry services to user agencies. However,
R and D efforts are still continuing to further reduce the gate length to 0"1 #m or
less for higher frequency of operation and to achieve noise figures of a few tenths of
a decibel and power outputs of more than a Watt/mm. Although some isolated efforts
in this area are continuing in some R and D institutions within the country, the
time is considered ripe to concentrate efforts on bridging the gap in this fast
emerging area of technology.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Dr G N Acharya, for encouragement.
References
Asaro L A, Dilorenzo J V and Fukui H 1977 1EDM Digest Technical Papers 370
Berenz J J 1985 Microwave and RF 24 121
Camisa R L, Taylor G C, Cuomo F P, Reichert W F and Brown R 1984 RCA Review 45 606
Daga O P, Singh B R and Khokle W S 1985 Proceedings International Conference on the Physics and
Technology of Compensated Semiconductors, liT, Madras, Feb. 20-22, pp. 25-28
Daga O P, Fricke K and Hartnagel H L 1986 J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 2260
Dilorenzo J V and Khandelwal D D 1982 GaAs Principles and Technology (Dedham, MA: Aretech
House)
Frike K and Daga O P 1987 Microwave measurements of Power FET, Research Report, CEERI, Pilani
(unpublished)
Fukui H 1979 Br. Syst. Tech. J. 58 771
Fukuta M, Suyame K, Suzuki H, Nakayama Y and Ishikawa H 1976 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory
Tech. M T T 24 312-317
Furutsuka T, Tsuji T and Hasegawa F 1978 IEEE Transact. Electron Dev. ED--25 563
Hasegawa F, Takayama Y, Higashiesaka A, Furutsuka T and Honjo K 1978 International Solid State
Circuits Conference Digest Technical Papers, pp 118-119
Kim B, Macksey H M, Tserng H Q, Shih H D and Camillari N 1987 Microwave J. 30, 3 153
Mitsui Y, Kobiki M, Wataze M, Otsubo M, Ishi T and Mitsui S 1979 Electron Lett. 15 461
Moncrief F J 1980 Microwaves and RF 19, 2 36
Nogami M, Hirachi Y and Ohata K 1982 Microelectronic J. 13 29
Singh J K, Roybardhan A, Kothari H S, Singh B R and Khokle W S 1987 Proc. IEEE 75 850
Singh J K, Daga O P, Kothari H S, Singh B R and Khokle W S 1988 Microelectronic J. ED--25 563