International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig
Performance investigation of a variable speed vapor compression
           system for fault detection and diagnosis
                                              Minsung Kim, Min Soo Kim1*
                School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, South Korea
                   Received 26 August 2004; received in revised form 26 November 2004; accepted 26 November 2004
                                                      Available online 15 January 2005
Abstract
  An experimental study has been performed to investigate the effect of four artificial faults on the performance of a variable
speed vapor compression system. Experimental setup to test several artificial faults was made by modifying the conventional
vapor compression test rig. Four major faults of compressor fault, condenser fault, evaporator fault, and refrigerant leakage,
were implemented by observing the variation of cooling capacity. Two different rule-based modules for constant and variable
speed operations were organized for an easy diagnosis of system faults. These two modules were applied differently as the
cooling capacity satisfies the necessary air conditioning load. As a result, COP degradation due to the fault in a variable speed
system is severer than that in a constant speed system.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Compression system; Compressor; Variation; Speed; Correlation; Fault; Performance
     Etude sur la performance d’un système de détection et de
  diagnostic d’anomalies appliqué à un système à compression de
                      vapeur à vitesse variable
Mots clés : Système à compression ; Compresseur ; Variation ; Vitesse ; Corrélation ; Panne ; Performance
1. Introduction                                                           component of the system. For this reason, fault detection
                                                                          and diagnosis (FDD) systems are installed to prevent the
   Since HVAC&R systems are getting complicated and                       main system from the deadly failure or performance
extended, there is a great need of advanced technology to                 degradation caused by various faults. FDD system was
observe, monitor, and check up real-time behaviors of each                originally developed for the purpose of safety issues. [1] For
                                                                          example, in nuclear power plants or aircrafts, FDD systems
                                                                          are equipped for guaranteed operation even with high
  * Corresponding author. Tel.: C82 2 880 8362; fax: C82 2 883            installation cost. On the other hand, a number of recent
0179.                                                                     industrial applications pursue the reduction of management
    E-mail address: minskim@snu.ac.kr (M.S. Kim).                         cost related with equipment downtime, service costs, or
  1
    Associate member of IIR.                                              utility costs. Since FDD systems for HVAC&R industry are
0140-7007/$35.00 q 2004 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2004.11.008
482                         M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488
  Nomenclatures
  COP       coefficient of performance                               TCO.D      compressor discharge temperature [8C]
  3         fault alarm threshold                                    DTSC       liquid line subcooling [8C]
  m_ r      mass flow rate of refrigerant [g/s]                      DTW        temperature difference of water inlet and outlet
  N         compressor speed [rpm]                                              [8C]
  PC        condenser outlet pressure [kPa]                          DTB        temperature difference of brine inlet and outlet
  PE        evaporator inlet pressure [kPa]                                     [8C]
  TBO       brine outlet temperature [8C]                            Subscript
  TC        condensation temperature [8C]                            ref       reference
  TE        evaporator inlet temperature [8C]
mainly considered to reduce the management cost, it should           diagnostic module assuming individual features as a series
be approached from the view of its usefulness and cost               of independent probabilistic accidents. Chen and Braun
effectiveness.                                                       (2001) [6] developed simple rule-based FDD methods for a
    Grimmelius (1995) [2] developed an on-line failure               packaged air conditioner with a thermal expansion valve
diagnosis system for a refrigeration system used in a vessel         (TXV). They suggested a fault diagnostic scheme by
or a plant. A symptom matrix based on the combination of             comparing the sensitivity of residuals based on the fault
casual analysis was used for the FDD system. Stylianou               characteristic chart. Castro (2001) [7] applied a nearest
and Nikanpour (1996) [3] diagnosed faults of a reciprocat-           neighbor method and a nearest prototype method for fault
ing chiller. The authors suggested three fault detection             detection of a chiller. The author calculated Euclidean
modules for startup, stop, and steady-state operations based         distances of the current state based on the selected two
on a thermodynamic model and expert knowledge of the                 largest residuals, and estimated the possibility of fault from
chiller. For a successive research, Stylianou (1997) [4]             the distance information.
presented the fault diagnostic methodology using a rule-                 Even though various FDD studies have been carried out
based statistical method. Rossi and Braun (1997) [5]                 for a vapor compression system, mostly they focused on the
developed a statistical FDD method for a roof-top air                systems with fixed speed compressors. Considering several
conditioner. They suggested a fault detection module                 HVAC systems adopt variable speed compressors, the FDD
applying Bayesian classifier, and developed a fault                  researches on variable speed systems are very important. In
                                        Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.
                               M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488                               483
this research, a laboratory-scale experimental apparatus of             based on the parameters measured at the reference operating
vapor compression system with a variable speed drive was                condition. Brine flow rates of 60, 75, 90 g/s represent low,
set up for several fault tests. The apparatus equipped with             medium, high cooling loads, respectively.
two controllers for the variation of a compressor speed and                Four artificial faults are tested in this study. Compressor
the opening of an electronic expansion. The performance                 fault was simulated by hot gas bypass using a fine-tuning
variations and other characteristics are investigated under             valve which connects compressor outlet to inlet. The
several artificial faults scenarios.                                    compressor fault is modulated by the opening of the bypass
                                                                        valve, where the level was based on the reduction ratio of
2. Experimental setup and test conditions
    Fig. 1 illustrates the schematic diagram of a variable
speed system for FDD experiments in this study. The test rig
consisted of a compressor, a condenser, an evaporator,
and an electronic expansion valve. The compressor was an
open-type vehicle reciprocating compressor with a design of
two inline cylinders. Displacement of the compressor is
3.92 m3/h at 1450 rpm. The condenser and the evaporator
were two concentric heat exchangers of the same size and
length. R22 was used as a working fluid, and water was used
as a secondary fluid for the condenser. Brine of 40%
ethylene-glycol aqueous solution was used for the evaporator.
The compressor was driven by motor-inverter assembly, and
its speed was controlled to maintain the brine outlet
temperature of the evaporator within 16.7G0.1 8C. Elec-
tronic expansion valve opening was controlled to give the
uniform evaporator exit superheat of 5G0.3 8C. Pro-
portional-integral-derivative (PID) control based on the
second Ziegler–Nichols tuning method was applied.
    Table 1 shows the experimental conditions for the
reference test and the fault test. Compressor speed is limited
below 1600 rpm, which is properly set as a maximum speed
as in the case of a real machine. At a reference charge of
R22, the system is adjusted to satisfy 5 8C of liquid line
subcooling and 16.7 8C of brine outlet temperature of the
evaporator. The severity of faults was labeled in percentage
Table 1
Experimental conditions for the reference test and the fault test
Parameters            Units        Reference test    Fault test
Brine inlet           8C              26.7           26.7
temperature
Brine outlet          8C              16.7           16.7
temperature
Brine flow            g/s             75             60/75/90
rate
Water inlet           8C              35.0           30.0/35.0/40.
temperature                                          0
Water flow            g/s            100             100
rate
Suction line          8C               5.0           5.0
superheat
Compressor            rpm          1185              w1600
speed                                                                   Fig. 2. Performance variation of the compressor fault with respect to
Charge of             kg               0.84          –                  cooling load. (a) Compressor speed. (b) Brine temperature at
R22                                                                     evaporator exit. (c) Refrigerant flow rate. (d) Coefficient of
                                                                        performance.
484                            M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488
refrigerant flow rate obtained from the reference test.                 1600 rpm, brine outlet temperature did not reach the given
Refrigerant leakage is set by reducing the total amount of              set value. Trends of compressor speed and brine outlet
refrigerant charge. Fault level of refrigerant leak was the             temperature were very similar in all other fault tests.
ratio of charged mass reduction from the reference charge.                  Distinct characteristics of compressor fault are observed
    Fault concept in the condenser and evaporator is                    in Fig. 2(c). The refrigerant flow rate remains the same
basically the same. Malfunction of a fan or deterioration               regardless of the fault level except at the ‘out of capacity’
of surface feature may cause the degradation of heat transfer           situation. Similarly, most of other parameters are found to
performance. Heat exchanger fault in this study was                     keep their own values. Under compressor fault, the
designed to reduce the capacity of the heat exchanger by                compressor is accelerated to compensate the lost capacity.
changing the heat transfer area. In order to reduce heat                Since the fault is caused only by hot gas bypass, almost all
transfer area, flow passage of the secondary fluid was                  other parameters are not affected if the refrigerant flow rate
changed by bypass ports installed at the each end of heat               in the main loop maintains the original value. Fig. 2(d)
exchanger subsection. Fault designs for both condenser and              shows the degradation of coefficient of performance (COP)
evaporator are alike. Reduction ratio of heat exchanger area            with respect to the increase of fault level and cooling load.
is set to fault level.                                                  Since the higher compressor speed results in the lower
                                                                        efficiency, COP at the constant speed of 1600 rpm,
                                                                        representing ‘out of capacity’ conditions, degrades less
3. Test results of fault performance                                    than the COP at variable speed conditions.
3.1. Compressor fault                                                   3.2. Refrigerant leakage
    Fig. 2 compares the performance variation under three                   Fig. 3 shows trends of liquid line subcooling and COP
different cooling loads. Data points specified as ‘out of               change with respect to load requirements. The vertically
capacity’ imply that cooling capacity is insufficient for the           dotted line represents optimal charge, and the left side of the
required cooling load. Fig. 2(a) shows that the compressor is           optimal charge line shows overcharged operations. Over-
accelerated as the increase of fault level and cooling load.            charge caused by technical inexperience should be regarded
From Fig. 2(b), brine outlet temperature is well controlled             as a fault. But sometimes overcharge is hardly considered as
near 16.7 8C, but becomes uncontrollable at the high cooling            a fault for some large systems with a liquid receiver installed
load when the fault level is over 4%. That is, even though              in the liquid line. Such systems might be overcharged
compressor speed approached at the maximum speed of                     intentionally to retard performance degradation caused by
                                                                        unpredicted leakage of refrigerant. In this case, overcharge
Fig. 3. Performance variation of the refrigerant charge with respect    Fig. 4. Performance variation of the condenser fault with respect to
to cooling load. (a) Liquid line subcooling. (b) Coefficient of         cooling load. (a) Condensation pressure. (b) Coefficient of
performance.                                                            performance.
                                M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488                              485
itself may not be regarded as a fault. By this reason, this              cooling load. Since low cooling load operation requires
study did not regard an overcharge as a fault and focused on             reduced heat transfer, the reduction of heat exchanger area
leakage only.                                                            has a little impact on COP for the low load condition.
    From Fig. 3(a), liquid line subcooling goes down
gradually as the leakage portion increases. The liquid line
                                                                         3.4. Evaporator fault
subcooling approaches zero in the high leakage condition,
which means the refrigerant at the condenser outlet turns
                                                                            Fig. 5(a) shows the trends of evaporator pressure which
into a saturated state. When the system load increases,
temperature difference at the heat exchangers should                     decreases at a higher fault level. Little change was detected
increase. Thus the subcooling is getting greater due to the
increase of pressure difference between condenser and
evaporator. From Fig. 3(b), COP is reduced as the fault level
increases. COP change does not appear distinctively under
overcharge or small leakage conditions. However, if
refrigerant is leaked out of the system beyond a certain
extent of approximately 15%, COP degrades very much.
3.3. Condenser fault
    Fig. 4(a) shows the increase of condenser pressure along
with the fault level. When heat transfer area is reduced, the
capacity of a heat exchanger is decreased. As a result, the
total capacity of condensation reduces at a constant speed
condition. But at a variable speed condition, the system tries
to catch up the deficient capacity through compressor speed
change then the entire heat capacity is kept as the same
level. Therefore, the temperature difference between
refrigerant and water is raised and the condenser pressure
increases. Fig. 4(b) shows COP degradation for several fault
levels. COP degrades less for low cooling load than for high
Fig. 5. Performance variation of the evaporator fault with respect to    Fig. 6. Comparison of COP changing rates with respect to fault type.
cooling load. (a) Evaporation pressure. (b) Coefficient of               (a) Compressor fault. (b) Refrigerant leakage. (c) Condenser fault.
performance.                                                             (d) Evaporator fault.
486                          M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488
in absolute pressure of the evaporator inlet with respect to           operated at its off-design point and the performance
the cooling load. It is because temperatures at the brine inlet        becomes worse. Additionally, when the compressor oper-
and outlet are controlled uniformly and the only refrigerant           ates at a high speed, the ratio of capacity increase cannot
flow rate is closely relevant to the cooling capacity. Fig. 5(b)       follow the increase of compressor work. Thus the faults are
shows the degradation of COP as the increase of the                    more influential to a variable speed system. From Fig. 6(a)–
evaporator fault level. The overall trend is quite similar with        (d), COP degradation is commonly redeemed when the
the condenser fault, but the rate of COP degradation is quite          compressor operates at the maximum speed. However, COP
less.                                                                  reduces more when the compressor operates in variable
    Fig. 6 shows COP change for the applicable faults in this          speed conditions. If the compressor speed is not restricted, it
study. There are remarkable difference in performance with             will speed up over the maximum to retrieve from the ‘out of
respect to the load requirements, and fault levels. The                capacity’ condition. In this case, the compressor shows
compressor fault in Fig. 6(a) shows COP reduces similarly              lower performance than at the maximum speed because of
regardless of cooling load conditions. Since the compressor            lower efficiency at higher speed. Moreover, the increased
fault mostly results in a loss of refrigerant flow rate, the           capacity will pull down the mean brine temperature. Thus,
system parameters are hardly affected by the fault level as            the points of ‘out of capacity’ in Fig. 7 will be moved down.
long as the flow rate reduction due to faults is compensated.          It means COP degradation by fault is severe in a variable
However, refrigerant leakage or heat exchanger fault result            speed system. Therefore, the development of FDD method
in the change of operating point, therefore, their influences          is much more important for a variable speed system than for
                                                                       a constant speed system.
are strong as the changes of cooling load condition. From
the test results of the refrigerant leakage or the heat
exchanger fault under a low load condition, COP degrades
weakly.                                                                4. Establishment of FDD system
    Normally, COP decreases as the fault level or cooling
load increases. When the fault level increases, the system is              Fig. 7 shows a prototype of FDD system for a variable
                        Fig. 7. Prototype of a real-time FDD algorithm for a variable and constant speed system.
                              M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488                           487
speed refrigeration unit. First, the current state of compres-            two sorts of classifiers were used to check whether the
sor speed or brine outlet temperature should be monitored to              cooling capacity satisfies the cooling load requirement.
see if the compressor speed is constant or variable. If the               When the cooling capacity satisfies the cooling load (i.e.
compressor speed is constant at its maximum, the                          compressor speed is below maximum or brine outlet
subsequent diagnosis follows a series of FDD system for a                 temperature is at the set temperature), fault diagnosis is
constant speed system. On the contrary, when the compres-                 applied to the classifier of a variable speed system. If the
sor speed is below the maximum speed, the subsequent                      capacity does not meet the cooling load (i.e. the compressor
procedure follows the variable speed system.                              is operated in its maximum speed), fault diagnostic should
    To determine whether the system is faulty or not, an ideal            follow the classifier for a constant speed system. Therefore,
way is to evaluate the possibility of fault from the variation            in this experiment, two sort of rule-based diagnostic
of COP. However, it is not cost-effective to measure COP                  classifiers are established separately for a variable speed
directly using expensive measuring devices. Instead of                    system and a constant speed system. These rules were
measuring COP, other parameter like a compressor speed                    developed and tested through experiments over a range of
can be used as a fault detection parameter for a variable                 operating conditions in this study.
speed system. The compressor speed is easily estimated by                     Table 2(a) and (b) shows the rule-based fault classifi-
monitoring the frequency input modulated by the inverter.                 cation charts for a constant speed system and a variable
By the way, when the compressor operates at its maximum                   speed system, respectively. Refrigerant leakage fault is
speed, compressor speed is inappropriate for a fault                      divided into two groups by the leak amount of 15% of the
detection parameter since no speed change was carried                     initial charge. When the leak is over 15%, the system is
out. In this case, a brine outlet temperature is good as an               always operated in the maximum speed and the variable
alternative parameter. Then the selected fault detection                  speed classifier could not be applicable. From the two tables,
parameter is compared with its reference value. In case                   each parameter in a constant speed system shows clear
that the difference of the two values is larger than the                  increase or decrease compared in a variable speed system.
threshold 3, the fault alarm is activated to notify the                   Even though there is a fault in the system, compressor and
occurrence of fault.                                                      expansion valve are well controlled to maintain the required
    When the system is expected to be faulty, diagnostic                  performance in a variable speed system. This is the reason
module performs fault classification using the residuals                  why the rise and fall of the parameter values are not
between expected and measured parameters. In this study,                  distinctively conceived for a variable speed system.
Table 2
Changes in parameters of a vapor compression system
Fault type        TE                TC                TSC             TCO.D              DTW             DTB              N
Constant speed operation
Compressor       [                  Y                 Y               [                  Y               Y                –
fault
Refrigerant
leakage
   !15%          –                  –                 Y               –                  Y               Y                –
   O15%          Y                  Y                 –a              –                  Y               Y                –
Condenser        Y                  [                 –               [                  Y               Y                –
fault
Evaporator       Y                  Y                 [               –                  Y               Y                –
fault
Variable speed operation
Compressor       –                  –                 –               [                  –               –                [
fault
Refrigerant
leakage
   !15%          –                  –                 Y               [                  –               –                [
   O15%          Not applicableb
Condenser        –                  [                 Y               [                  –               –                [
fault
Evaporator       Y                  –                 [               [                  –               –                [
fault
 a
     The exit of liquid line reached saturated liquid state.
 b
     Compressor speed remained 1600 rpm (the maximum speed properly set in this study) when the refrigerant leaked over 15%.
488                         M. Kim, M.S. Kim / International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 481–488
5. Conclusions                                                       performed. Additionally, a variety of researches should be
                                                                     accompanied to operate the system appropriately in spite of
    Performance of a variable speed vapor compression                fault occurrence.
system was experimentally investigated for specified faults.
The test rig was devised by modifying a conventional water-
to-refrigerant system with an open-type reciprocating
compressor. The system parameters are less sensitive to              References
the faults at a variable speed condition because the
compressor speed is controlled to compensate the reduced
                                                                     [1] J.E. Braun, Automated fault detections and diagnostics for
capacity, which suppresses the changeability of the system.              vapor compression cooling equipment, Int J HVAC&R Res 5
The compressor fault test did not provide clear difference in            (2) (1999) 85–86.
the system parameters for a variable speed system. The               [2] H.T. Grimmelius, J.K. Woud, G. Been, On-line failure
variation of refrigerant charge or heat exchanger has a great            diagnosis for compression refrigeration plant, Int J Refrig 18
influence on the overall operation. However, the perform-                (1) (1995) 31–41.
ance variations due to those faults are largely influenced by        [3] M. Stylianou, D. Nikanpir, Performance monitoring, fault
initial charge and heat exchanger sizing.                                detection, and diagnosis of reciprocating chillers, ASHRAE
    Algorithm of the fault detection and diagnosis for a                 Trans 102 (1) (1996) 615–627.
variable speed vapor compression system was applied                  [4] M. Stylianou, Application of classification functions to chiller
separately as the system satisfies the required load. Rule-              fault detection and diagnosis, ASHRAE Trans 103 (1) (1997)
based fault classifiers were established for a constant speed            645–656.
                                                                     [5] T.M. Rossi, J.E. Braun, A statistical, rule-based fault detection
system and a variable speed system. The FDD system
                                                                         and diagnostic method for vapor compression air conditioners,
developed in this study provided a prototype FDD sequence
                                                                         Int J HVAC&R Res 3 (1) (1997) 19–37.
of a various speed system. From this experimental study, the         [6] B. Chen, J.E. Braun, Simple rule-based methods for fault
system with an open-type reciprocating compressor was                    detection and diagnostics applied to packaged air conditioners,
found to show different trends of performance with respect               ASHRAE Trans 107 (1) (2001) 847–857.
to the operating condition. COP degradation by fault is              [7] N.S. Castro, G. Remington, Performance evaluation of a
much severer in a variable speed condition than in a constant            reciprocating chiller using experimental data and model
speed condition. Therefore, researches on FDD systems for                predictions for fault detection and diagnosis, ASHRAE Trans
a variable speed system should be more carefully                         108 (1) (2002) 889–903.