Icemt 1209
Icemt 1209
net/publication/369793804
CITATIONS READS
0 59
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hossein Shahinzadeh on 05 April 2023.
       Abstract—In this paper, a new load frequency control (LFC)        PI and PID are implemented rigorously by the researchers due
   technique is suggested for the dual area thermal hydro (DATH)         to design simplicity. Further, extended versions of PID like
   system. Tilt-integer-derivative plus filter (TIDN) optimized with     adaptive (A) PID (APID), PID plus accelerator (PIDA),
   water cycle technique (WCT) is designed and tested on the             modified (M) PID (MPID) [5], cascade PI-PD and PID plus
   DATH system for a perturbation of 10% step load (10%SLP) on           additional derivative (PIDD) are also extensively reported.
   area-1. The superiority of TIDN is demonstrated with other            Moreover, the effective operation of these controllers requires
   controllers of fuzzy PID and PIDD. DATH system is taken with          soft computing methodlogies for locating the regulator design
   communication time delays (CTDs) to analyze system dynamic            indicators. Techniques such as butterfly optimization
   behaviour close to practical nature. To substantiate the
                                                                         technique (BOT) [6], genetic fuzzy technique (GFT), particle
   fluctuations in DATH dynamic behaviour a coordinated control
   mechanism of redox flow batteries (RFBs) and Thyristor control
                                                                         swarm optimization (PSO), modified group hunting (MGH)
   phase shifter (TCPS) is implemented. Investigation showcases          [7] search method, harmony search algorithm (HSA),
   the improvement in DATH performance with a coordinated                improved JAYA (IJAYA), African vulture algorithm (AFA),
   control mechanism with regards to the reponses dampening and          mine blast algorithm (MBA), firefly algorithm (FA), seagull
   time conceding to attain the stable condition.                        optimization technique (SOT) [8], genetic algorithm (GA),
                                                                         symbiotic organisms search (SOS) technique, modified group
      Keywords—DATH system, Water cycle technique, TIDN                  search (MGS), fruit bat algorithm (FBA), bull lion technique
   controller, 10%SLP, TCPS-RFBs strategy.                               (BLT), imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), water cycle
                                                                         algorithm (WCA) [9], stochastic fractal search (SFS), artificial
                         I. INTRODUCTION                                 electric field (AEFA) algorithm, pathfinder approach (PFA),
       Rapid industrialization in developing nations requires            Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), fruit fly algorithm (FFA) [10],
   more electric power for increasing load demands. The                  donkey and smuggler optimization (DSO), black widow
   penetration of renewable and distributed generating (DG)              optimization (BWO), elephant herd optimizer (EHO) [11],
   sources with the interconnected power system (IPS) has been           backtracking search technique (BST), levy flight algorithm
   increasing to meet the everlasting power demands. The                 (LFA), and falcon optimization technique (FOT) etc. are
   penetration of numerous units made the IPS network more               reported. However, PID type regulators are not suitable for the
   complex [1-2]. The control and operation of a complex IPS             network of IPS with non-linear realistic features.
   network require a sophisticated control mechanism. The load               For non-linear IPS models, researchers suggest fuzzy logic
   on the IPS will vary momentarily and the generation must be           control (FLC) aided conventional controllers. Moreover, these
   varied according to it as the storage of electric power in bulk       FLC-aided regulators also necessitate soft computing
   quantity is not feasible [3]. However, the key indicator is the       techniques for efficient performance. However considering
   real power gap (RPG) in generation-demand which directly              the practical aspects of design, FLC is more complex and not
   influences the frequency of the IPS network. The fluctuations         feasible. Further, fractional order (FO) based approaches are
   in system frequency will significantly affect the IPS network         widely accepted by the researchers and utilized the soft
   stability. Hence, an efficient control technique is required to       computing techniques of krill herd technique (KHT), ant lion-
   regulate the system frequency by reducing the RPG in demand           pattern search (AL-PS) [12], gas Brownian motion (GBM),
   generation. The reduction of RPG in the IPS network is                multi-objective external (MOET) technique, lion optimization
   fulfilled by the mechanism of LFC [4].                                algorithm (LOA), hybrid GA-FA, volleyball algorithm
       In LFC, by making use of the governing action the energy          (VBA), bacterial foraging technique (BFT), big-bang big-
   stored in the moving parts and the frequency will be regulated        crunch (BBBC), flower pollination technique (FPT), wild gate
   up to a certain extent. Large deviations in IPS network               algorithm (WGA) [13] etc. are implemented. Literature study
   frequency that evolved due to loading uncertainties are to be         displayed the fact that the new algorithms have always the
   handled by the secondary regulator. Thus, secondary regulator         scope in tuning the regulators.
   design is the key to the stability of IPS. Several regulators like
                                                     1              1                    1 + SK r Tr                        K PS             ∆f1
                  e − Sτ d   TIDN        +                                                                   + +
                                                  1 + STg        1 + STt                  1 + STr                        1 + STPS
                  CDTs                             Speed
                                                  Governor           Reheat-steam Turbine
                                                                                                                     +   TCPS
                                                                                                                         2Π T12             +
                                                                                                                     +
                                                                                                                           S
                                                          1                        1 + STrw                                 K PS             ∆f 2
          +
                  e − Sτ d   TIDN        +                                                                   + +
                                                       1 + ST1                     1 + ST2                               1 + STPS
                  CDTs                               Mechanical                  Hydro Turbine
          B                              1          Hydro Governor
                                                                                                                          RFBs
                                         R
              II. POWER SYSTEM UNDER STUDY                                        III. CONTROLLER AND OBJECTIVE FUNCTION
                                                                                                                                        −1
    DATH under investigation is shown in Fig.1, which                    The injection of the transfer function S n with the
consists of two areas. The power generation units of Thermal         proportional component in PID forms the TID regulator.
and hydro are placed in area-1 and area-2. The analysis is           Though PID is effective in quickly enhancing the system
carried out upon targeting area-1 of DAHT with 10%SLP.               stability but suffers from generating uncertain plant inputs.
DATH is developed in the SIMULINK platform of MATLAB                 Moreover, the noise rejection is very poor which greatly
and the parameter is taken from [15]. The non-linear feature         affects the plant performance. The filter in the TIDN regulator
of CTDs is taken with DATH to get the investigative analysis         rejects the disturbances and noises and hence aids the better
close to practicality. CTDs have existed with the data               optimal performance. The architecture of TIDN [16] is
exchange among various sensors in the IPS via the
depicted in Fig.2. The parameters of TIDN are found using the                   the best solution is the sea. The initialization of RDs is
WCT algorithm with regards to integral time area error                          modelled as given in Equation (4-5).
(ITAE) noted in Equation (2).
                                                                                                                     Start
            TSim
 J ITAE =     (Δf
             0
                     1   + Δf 2 + ΔPtie12 ) * T dt                        (2)
                                                                                                         Initialize Initial Parameters
                                                                                               Δf2 (Hz)
A. Case-I: Analysis of DATH under different controllers
                                                                                                            -10
      To assess the DATH system dynamic behaviour area-1 is
loaded with 10%SLP. Regulators like PIDD, fuzzy PID and
                                                                                                            -15                                                   PIDD
TIDN are placed one after the other in both the areas of DATH
                                                                                                                                                                  Fuzzy PID
and the parameters of all the above said regulators are found                                                                                                     TIDN
optimally using the WCT. To elevate the efficient control                                                   -20
technique, the DATH responses under the governing of TIDN,                                                     0              5       10      15        20         25         30
PIDD and fuzzy PID are compared in Fig.5. It is evident that                                                                               Time (sec)
the dynamic behaviour of DATH is strongly controlled by the                                                                                (c)
TIDN compared to PIDD and fuzzy PID. Responses in Fig.5
are interpreted in terms of settling time and are noted in Table                                                   Fig.5. Case-I responses a.∆f1 b.∆Ptie12 c.∆f2.
I. It has been noticed that in the DATH under the WCT-based                            B. Case-II: Exhibiting the CTDs effect on DATH
TIDN regulator, the fluctuations in the responses are very                                 performance
much mitigated and attain a steady position in less time.
                                                                                            From the analysis in the above subsection, it is concluded
Moreover, the TIDN effectively minimized the ITAE and
                                                                                       that the WCT-based TIDN is superior and it is continued as
increased by 70.48%with PIDD and 43.33%with fuzzy PID.
                                                                                       the secondary regulator to the DATH system for further
The parameters of TIDN, PIDD and fuzzy PID are retrieved
                                                                                       investigation.
using WCT and are provided in Table II.
                                                                                                                     -3
                     0.01                                                                                        x 10
                                                                                                            2
0.005 0
0 -2
                                                                                                            -4
Δf1 (Hz)
                    -0.005
                                                                                         Δf1 (Hz)
-0.01 -6
                    -0.015                                                                                  -8
                                                                      PIDD
                                                                                                           -10                                               Without CTDs
                     -0.02                                            Fuzzy PID
                                                                                                                                                             With CTDs
                                                                      TIDN
                                                                                                           -12
                    -0.025                                                                                    0                   5           10             15               20
                          0            5      10       15        20    25         30                                                       Time (sec)
                                                    Time (sec)
                                                                                                                                           (a)
                                                   (a)
                                                                                                                        -3
                              -3                                                                                  x 10
                         x 10                                                                              0.5
                     4
                                                                                                             0
                     2
                                                                                       ΔPtie12 (p.u. MW)
                                                                                                           -0.5
ΔPtie12 (p.u. MW)
                     0
                                                                                                            -1
-2 -1.5
                      -3                                                                                              -3
                   x 10                                                                                         x 10
              2                                                                                          0.5
                                                                                                           0
              0
                                                                                                          -1
              -4
                                                                                                         -1.5
              -6                                                                                                                                      Without Device
                                                              Without CTDs                                -2                                          With TCPS
                                                              With CTDs                                                                               With TCPS-RFBs
              -8                                                                                         -2.5
                0              5            10                15             20                              0                   5                   10                15
                                         Time (sec)                                                                                     Time (sec)
                                          (c)                                                                                           (b)
                                                                                                                   -3
                    Fig.6. Case-II responses a.∆f1 b.∆Ptie12 c.∆f2.                                            x 10
                                                                                                           2
    For 10%SLP on area-1 and under WCT tuned TIDN
regulator the responses of DATH with and without
                                                                                                           0
considering CTDs are analyzed and depicted in Fig.6.
Observing the responses in Fig.6 the DATH dynamic
                                                                                                          -2
                                                                                              Δf2 (Hz)
-4