~
~
                                                                                        ....____,
             INTRODUCTORY TEXT IN POLITICAL SCIENCE
                                Copyright © 2012
                               Rotimi Ajayi Ph.D
                                         &
                             Yinka Fashagba Ph.D
                                                                                         De
                          ISBN: 978 - 978 - 057 - 330 - 5                                Ak
                                                                                         Ab
                             Published in Nigeria by:
                                                                                         Int
            Department Of Political Science & International Relations,
                                                                                         Ct
             Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State Nigeria
                                                                                         Th
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any        Cf
    form or by any means, electronic or mechanical - including photocopying,             Rel
recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system -without permission
                                                                                           0
  in writing from the publisher except for brief excerpts in magazines, articles,
                                   reviews, etc.                                         Cf
                                                                                         Po'
                 For further information or permission, contact:
                                                                                         Cf
       Department Of Political Science & International Relations                    ~
                                                                                         Sta
              Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State Nigeria
                                                                                        CH
                                                                                        Str1
     ~
     ~   \::)   -~~ ~
                    ""-   ':;:. R:_   5""'""l~
           TABLE oF CoNTENTS
     Dedication                                   5
     Aknowledgement                               7
     About the Contributors                       9
     Introduction                                 13
     CHAPTER ONE:
     The Meaning and Nature of Politics           17
'Y
     CHAPTER TWO:
     Relationship Between Political Science and
n
     Other Social Science Disciplines             45
     CHAPTER THREE:
     Power, Influence and Authority               65
     CHAPTER FOUR:
     State, Nation and Society                    99
     CHAPTER FIVE:
     Structure and Organisation of Government     133
Introductory Text In Political Science
  CHAPTER SIX:
  Models of Government in Modern States           161
  CHAPTER SEVEN:
  Forms of Political Administrative System        189   ,_
  CHAPTER EIGHT:                                                            I
  Constitution and Constitutionalism              213                        Tc
  CHAPTER NINE:                                                    Chancellor, :
  Political Socialization and Political Culture   247         For his unwaverir
   CHAPTER TEN:                                              scholarship
   Public Opinion                                 269
   CHAPTER ELEVEN:
   Political Parties and Pressure Groups          285
   CHAPTER TWELVE:
   Introduction to International Relations        321
   CHAPTER THIRTEEN:
   Essentials of International Relations          353
                                         4
                  DEDICATED
                  To Dr. David Oyedepo
          Chancellor, Landmark University, Omuaran
     For his unwavering commitment to the ideals of true
    scholarship
3
         AcKNOWLEDGEMENT
        t was Plato who once said, 'the beginning is the
 I      most important part of the work.' We appreciate
        God, the author of inspiration, for bringing to
fruition the efforts that culminatedin this volume.
 The Chancellor of Landmark University, Dr. David
Oyedepo has been a major advocate and sponsor of
research and the dissemination of its findings. We owe
   t:                              .
this book to his constant prodding.
 The Vice Chancellor, Covenant University, Professor
Aize Obayan and the Executive Secretary, World Mission
Agency, Pastor Yemi Nathaniel, have remained pillars
of support.
 To all the contributors, we thank you for believing in
the vision. You have shown in the words of George
Woodberry that, 'defeat is not the worst of failures. Not
to have tried is true failure.'·
 Thanks to all our academic colleagues, friends, and
particularly our students, whose interest is a pnme
                              7
Introductory Text In Political Science
motivation for this present effort.
  We thank all our reviewers and the printing press for
the final production of the book.
                                                              ABO{
                                                               p:
                                                              interests s·
                                                              and Intern
                                                                Dr.   J.   0
                                                              Departme
                                                              Relations,
                                                              his B.Sc.,
                                                              Ilorin. His
                                                              and Politi<
                                                              Political    s
                                                              University,
                                                              the Depa
                                                              Administt
                                                              between :t
                                                                Dr. Dan
                                                              (Public Ad
                                                              where he
                                                          l
                                         8
or
      ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
                   rof. Rotimi Ajayi is Professor of Political
       P           Science and the pioneer Vice Chancellor,
                   Landmark University, Omu-Aran. His research
     interests span Comparative Politics, Political Economy
     and International Relations.
       Dr.   J.   Olayinka Fashagba is Senior Lecturer in the
     Department of Political Science and International
     Relations, Landmark University, Oinu-Aran. He earned
     his B.Sc., M.Sc. and PhD degrees from University of
     Ilorin. His areas of interest include Comparative Politics
     and Political Economy. He is the Head, Department of
     Political Science and International Relations, Landmark
     University, Omu-Aran.He served in similar capacity in
     the Department of Political Science and Public
     Administration, Redeemer's University, Ogun State,
     between March and September, 2011.
      Dr. Daniel Eseme Gberevbie obtained his PhD degree
     (Public Administration) in 2008 from Covenant University
     where he is currently Senior Lecturer.
                                  9
Introductory Text In Political Science
  Dr. Sheriff Folarin is Senior Lecturer in the Department     of Political Scien
of Political Science and International Relations, Covenant     University, Offil
University, <f>ta. He obtained his PhD from Covenant           Sc. Degrees in Pt
University, Ota. His area of specialization is International   His areas of re
Relations. i                                                   Politics,    Inte
    Dr. Adelokhai Dennis Idonijeis Senior Lecturer and         Administration.
Head, Department of Public Administration, Ibrahim               Ise Olorunkan
Babangida University, Lapai. He obtained his PhD degree        of Political Scien
from Ambrose Alli University, E kpoma. H e specializes         University, Om
in Comparative Politics and Public Administration.             Sc. Degrees in I
   Dr. Oluwasakin Ajinde teaches in the Department of          Kano and Uni\
Political Science and International Relations, Landmark        PhD Candidate
University, Omu-A ran. He earned his PhD fro m                 specialization is
University o f Ibadan. His area of Specialization is             Segun Joshua
International Relations.                                       Political Science
   Samuel Oni is a Lecturer in the Department of Political     University, Ota
Science and International Relations, Covenant University,        Rotimi E. Mat
Ota, and currently a PhD Candidate in that Department.         Economics, Lan
   Segun Oshewolo currently lectures in the Department         his B.Sc. and 1
of Political Science and International Relations, Landmark     Kano and the
University, Omu-aran. He is a Junior Research Fellow           areas of resear
of the Institute for French Research in Africa (IFRA-          Political Econor
Nigeria). His areas of specialization include Comparative        Awopeju Ayo
Politics and Political Economy.                                Political Science
   Aleyomi, Michael B. is a Lecturer in the Department         Ikeji-Arakeji, 0
                                         10
                                                           About The Contributors
tment         of Political Science and International Relations, Landmark
enant         University, Omu-Aran. He obtained his B.Sc. and M.
en ant        Sc. Degrees in Political Science from University of Ilorin.
tional        His areas of research interests include Comparative
              Politics,   International        Relations     and       Public
rand          Administration.
·ahim          Ise Olorunkanmi Joseph is a Lecturer in the Department
egree         of Political Science and International Relations, Landmark
alizes        University, Omu-Aran. He obtained his B.Sc. and M.
              Sc. Degrees in Political Science from Bayero University,
nt of         Kano and University of Ibadan, respectively. He is a
mark          PhD Candidate at the University of Ibadan. His area of
-
:rom          specialization is International Relations.
)n   lS        Segun Joshua is a Lecturer in the Department of
              Political Science and International Relations, Covenant
itical        University, Ota where he is about to defend his PhD.
~rsity,         Rotimi E. Mathew is a Lecturer in the Department of
nent.         Economics, Landmark University, Omuaran. He earned
ment          his B.Sc. and M.Sc Degrees from Bayero University,
mark          Kano and the University of Ibadan, respectively. His
~llow     ·   areas of research interest span Energy Economics,
'RA-          Political Economy and Health Economics.
ative           Awopeju Ayo is a .Lecturer in the Department of
              Political Science, Joseph Ayo Babalola University OABU),
nent          Ikeji-Arakeji, Osun State. He respectively obtained his
                                          II
Introductory Text In Political Science
B.Sc. and M. Sc. Degrees in Political Science from
University of Ado-Ek:iti and the University of Ibadan.
He is presently pursuing his PhD at the University of
Ibadan. His areas of specialization include Comparative
Politics and Public Administration.
   Ogoma Daniel Ebun obtained the B.A and M.A Degrees                            I
in Philosophy from Ek:iti State University and University                        Rc
of Ibadan respectively. He lectures in the Department
of Political Science and International Relations, Landmark
University, Omu-Aran. His area of specialization is                 N~          lnl
Political Theory.                                                  political scien
   Solomon Adedire is a Lecturer in· the Department of             contributed a
Political Science and International Relations, Landmark            various writers
University, Omu-Aran. He is currently a PhD Candidate,             depth, compet
Lagos State University. His area of interest is Public             of political sci
Administration                                                     However, a ca
   Ahmed Lestwa Mohammed lectures inDepartment of                  that in certain
Political Science, Ibrahim Babangida University, Lapai.            was comprom
He obtained the B.Sc. Political Science from ABU, Zaria;           meant, among
MPA from Usman Dan Fodio University, Sokoto and                    reading materi
M.Sc. Political Science, University of Ilorin. He is
                                                             ...
                                                                   Although som
currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Political           coverage, they
Science, ABU Zaria. His area of specialization is Nigerian         some of the    s~
Government and Politics.                                           the knowledge
                                                                   in political sci1
                                         12
 without
:adox.G.
·African
Joks.
lity and
?S Review,
                            Cl1apter Nine
tperation)      PoLITicAL, SociAuzA-
Tli.Jm from      TION AND PoLITicAL
:ss.
_tion and                      CULTURE
;.),Path to
Defence                            Segun Joshua
~Nigeria.
              9.0 Introduction
                         ll societies, be it primitive or modern, often
Oxford:
mt (4th
               A         consciously inculcate in its citizenry, certain
                         cherished norms and values. The inculcation
              in the citizenry of these norms and values is considered
              necessary to prepare them to assume specific roles in
              the society towards realizing the goals of easy societal
              organization and maintenance of law and order. In other
              words, if an individual does not internalize the beliefs,
              norms and values of his society his behavioural
              characteristics and tendencies may violate acceptable
                                        245
Introductory Text In Political Science
standards of behaviour in the society.In the words of
Onwuka (1997), "the quality of an individual's
participation in community life is a function of the extent
to which he has internalized the norms, beliefs and values
of his community" (cited in Abonyi, 2006, p. 328).
  The process by which individuals learn and internalize
the beliefs, norms and values of their societies, for societal
organization and maintenance of law and order, is referred
to as socialization. Socialization as a concept has been
variously defined. According to Nnoli (1990), socialization
is a process through which members of a society gradually
internalize and appropriate various physical, cultural,
technological, aesthetic values of the society throughout
their lives. Socialization thus simply connotes life-long
learning. Socialization means all forms of learning regardless
of setting or age of the individual. Individual members of
every group have to learn the rule, expectations and
knowledge of that group. The group can be a family, the
army or the state, among several other examples. As
aconcept, socialization clearly ·encapsulates the process
through which people acquire a social identity and learn
the way of life within their society, a process synonymous
to learning of culture (Abonyi, 2006). And the essence of
socialization is to bring about social conformity of members
in any given society.
                                         246
                                                    Political, Socialization and Political Culture
In the words of          Five forms of socialization have been identified. These
an individual's         are: reverse socialization; developmental socialization;
tion of the extent      primary socialization; anticipation socialization; and re-
beliefs and values      socialization (Abonyi, 2005).
>06, p. 328).                  1. Reverse Socialization: Reverse socialization
:n and internalize             refers to when the younger generations. deviate
:ieties, for societal          from the desired behaviour or enculruration. For
I order, is referred           example, forming and joining secret cults and
:oncept has been               getting involved in other anti-social behaviours
990), socialization            and practices in higher institutions are demon-
a society gradually            strations of reverse socialization.
>hysical, cultural,
                               2. Developmental Socialization: Developmen-
xiety throughout
                               tal socialization refers to when former behavioural
onnotes life-long
                               patterns are discarded for new ones, as part of
learning regardless
                               transition in one's life. The developmental so-
ridual members of
                               cialization occurs throughout the human life cycle.
expectations and
                               An example could be the experience of a young
m be a family, the
                               man or woman who leaves home to join the mili-
1er examples. As
                               tary: this will bring a sharp break from the past
1lates the process
                               and exposition to radically different norms and
identity and learn
                               values in the man or woman.
ocess synonymous
\nd the essence of             3. Primary Socialization: Primary socialization
xmity of members               refers to the process through which people learn
                               the attitudes, values and actions appropriate for
                                                   247
Introductory Text In Political Science
           them to tit into a particular culture.                    political so<
           4. Anticipatory Socialization: Anticipatory so-           based on       t
           cialization is when a person rehearses for future         information
           positions, occupations and social relationships. An       peoples ins
           example is an instance of a high school student           its various a
           who suddenly imbibes the dress code and man-              or unofficia
           nerism of a higher institution (the University, for       Nnoli expla
           instance) upon hearing he had been offered ad-              To Rush (1
           mission in a university (Abonyi, 2005).                   process of 1
                                                                     understandiJ
           5. Re-Socialisation: Re-socialisation is a type of so-
                                                                     reactions
           cialization that involves confinement, in jails or men-
                                                                     Emamjome~
           tal hospitals. Re-socialization could be as a result of
                                                                     Verba (196
           the fact that the person has done something wrong
                                                                     continuous
           and needed to be socialized before he/ she can go
                                                                     political beh
           back and be a productive member of society.
                                                                     society with
   \Vith the background on what socialization means and              with the cha
its forms, it is pertinent to turn to the major concerns of          Almond and
this chapter: political socialization and political culture.         definition
                                                                     socialization:
9.1 Political Socialization
                                                                     standards an.
   According to Almond and Powell (1998), political                  called cultun
socialization is a part of socialization that shapes political         Basically,   1:'
attitudes. Most children acquire distinctive political               to be emphas:
attitudes and behavioural patterns at relatively early ages.         in an individ
This is corroboratedin Nnoli (1990), contending that                 (1990) rightly
                                         248
                                                    Political, Socialization and Political Culture
                       political socialization is a perspective of socialization
icipatory so-          based on the assumptions and perspectives about
ses for future         information and certain behavioural patterns formed by
ttionships. An         peoples in societies with respect to the government and
:hool student          its various activities. The assumptions might be official
)de and man-           or unofficial, planned or incidental, overt or covert, as
Jniversity, for        Nnoli explained.
n offered ad-           To Rush (1992), political socialization is a familiarization
)5).                   process of people with political system, which entails
                       understanding of politics to an acceptable level and their
ts a type of so-
                       reactions    to 'political phenomenon                     (cited in
n jails or men-
                       Emamjomezadeli et al., 2012). According to Almond and
~   as a result of
                       Verba (1963), political socialization is part of the
nething wrong
                       continuous process of social order in which certain
1e/ she can go
                       political behaviours are taught to the new members of a
    societr
                       society with the aim of making them think in accordance
)n means and           with the changing political system they find themselves.
tf   concerns of       Almond and Powell (1988) gave a very simple and lucid
litical culture.       definition of th·e twin concepts of political
                       socializationas"the way one generation passes its political
                       standards and belief to succeeding generations, a process
1   98), political     called cultural transformation" (p. 34).
1apes political         Basically, two points about political socialization need
:tive political        to be emphasized. First, socialization is a continuous process
    rely early ages.   in an individual's life. It is a life-long process, as Nnoli
    ntending that      (1990) righdy observed. "Attitudes established during infancy
                                                   249
Introductory Text In Political Science
are always being adapted or reinforced as the individual          ev(
passes through a variety of social experiences", in the words     19:
of Ahnond and Powel (1988, p. 34). The second point is
that political socialization may take the form of direct or
indirect learning (or transmission) of beliefs, norms and
values. In this respect, when socialization involves explicit
communication of information, values or feelings on politics
it is direct. The direct form of political socialization also
includes civics courses taught in public high schools, and
citizenship education taught in higher institutions can equally
be regarded as direct political socialization. According to
Ahnond and Powel (198~), political socialization is a process
by which people acquire relatively enduring orientation
towards politics in general and also to their political system
in particular.Conversely, indirect political socialization may
occur with force in theearly or formative years of a child.
Indirect political socialization may come in form of
developing an accommodating or aggressive stance towards
parents, teachers and friends, which may likely affect adult
attitude towards fellow citizens and political leaders.
9.2 Agen15 of Political Socialization
   There are different agents or institutions through which
political socialization can be acquired in any political
system. These include family, school, religion, peer group,
occupation, mass media, political parties, governments,
                                         250
                                                  Political, Socialization and Political Culture
 the individual       events, place, and tertiary institutions (Almond & Powe~
;", in the words      1988); Abonyi, 2006; Blass Rich (undated)).
;econd point is
                             1. The Family: The family is the basic and often
m of direct or
                             the most powerful and lasting agent of political
~fs,   norms and             socialization. Family has direct and indirect influ-
nvolves explicit             ences on individuals which determine their atti-
:lings on politics
                             tudes towards religion, authority, etc. Although
>cialization also
                             learning is a life-time process, the Erst ten years
:rh schools, and
:>                           is the most important period socialization takes
ions can equally
                             place in a person's life. This is the period indi-
1. According to
                             vidual personality is formed- the formative years.
,tion is a process
                             Schaefer and Laman (1995) contended:
·ing orientation
 political system            We experience socialization Erst as babies and
JCialization may             infants living 'in families; it is here that we de-
years of a child.            velop an initial sense of self. 1\1ost parents seek
ne in form of                to help their children become competent adoles-
e stance towards             cents and self-sufficient adults, which mean so-
ikely affect adult           cializing them into the norms and values of both
:al leaders.                 the family and the larger society. In this process,
                             adults themselves experience socialization as they
n                            adjust to become spouses, parents and in-laws
                             (cited in Abonyi, 2006, p. 337).
s through which
in any political             Collective decisions made by the family may ap-
jon, peer group,             pear authoritative and failure to comply may lead
~s,    governments,          to punishment (Almond & Powel, 1988). In addi-
                                                  251
Introductory Text In Political Science
           tion, opportunities to participate in family deci-
           sions early in life may sharpen the child's sense
          of political competence and also endow the child
          with capacity for political interaction and partici-
          pation in the political system as an adult. The
          child's behavioural pattern to family decisions may
          assist in obedience to constituted authority as a
          political subject.
          Indeed, the political beliefs of most individuals
          are often shaped by the behaviours, beliefs and
          values they experienced in their family environ-
          ment. Individuals must have absorbed perceptions
          about politics from conversations overheard ·within
          the family before becoming capable of making
          political judgments ten themselves. Blass (not dated)
          argued in the same vein that at age seven, most
          children in the US already identified with one
          political party or the other. Family upbringing may,
          to a large extent, determine the manifestation of
          political behaviour, whether activism or apath'y in
          later adulthood of the children.
          2. The School: Schools provide a veritable plat-
          form for sustained and controlled contact with
          students at the age their political beliefs can still
          be molded. The school system contributes to
                                         252
                                        Political, Socialization and Political Culture
family deci-      political socialization by providing the adolescent
:hild's sense     with knowledge about the political world and his
)W   the child    role in it. Cherished attitudes and values of the
and partici-      society are equally to a large extent being trans-
 adult. The       mitted by the schools. In view of this, the school
:Clstons may      plays a pivotal role in shaping attitudes of the
tthority as a     adolescent in accordance with the written and
                  unwritten rules of the society.
: individuals     Specifically, through the school system affection
 beliefs and      for the political system can be reinforced and alle-
Lily environ-     giance to the state instilled through common sym-
 perceptions      bols like the national flag, national anthem and na-
heard within      tional pledge. At times, yet, the school system does
~of   making      serve as agent of indoctrination of cherished po-
;s (not dated)    litical ideology, like it was in some communist coun-
seven, most       tries (the former U.S.S.R, in particular).
::d with one      3. Religion: Religion connotes system of beliefs
mngmg may,        or believing in supernatural beings and in the Cre-
ifestation of     ator and Controller of the universe. Religions in-
or apatHy in      culcate good morals in its adherents through calcu-
                  lated 'sermonization'. The moral and values taught
eritable plat-    by most religions quite frequently have implications
:ontact with      on politics and public policies. In fact, more often
liefs can still   than not, religious groups transmit definite political
ntributes to      preferences to their adherents. Churches through
                                       253
Introductory Text In Political Science
           their teachings instill strong belief systems in the           (
           Christians and hence shape the believers' views on              s
           socio-political is sues and policies ill<c abortion, gay       tl
           marriage, among others.                                         b
                                                                      •   11
           In addition, among religions there are varieties of
                                                                          tl
           political beliefs. Por instance, Roman Catholics
                                                                           b
           arc traditionally noted for political liberation while
           Protestants are conservative- although this con-                5
           servativeness seems to vary from one denomina-                 a:
           tion to another in the protestant churches. This               b
           has implications for ideological leanings.                      a1
                                                                           Sl
           4. Peer Groups: Although the school system and
                                                                           ti
           family are the most important agents of socializa-
                                                                           ti
           tion, the role of peer groups, including childhood
                                                                          gt
           play groups and friendship cliques, cannot be un-
                                                                           a~
           derrated too. This is because in a situation in which
                                                                          G
           both parents work, children tend to be socialized
           more by peers than by families. Furthermore, after             'gt
                                                                           st
           formal schooling ends, the influence of peer groups
           on people's political socialization increases. The             b
                                                                          ar
           influence of peer groups on individuals also be- ·
           come prominent at adolescent stage when they                   p<
           begin to break away from the family structure, feel-           M
           ing more like young adults.                                    m
                                         254
                                            Political. Socialization and Political Culture
stems in the        One of the ways through which a peer group
ers' views on       socializes its members is by putting pressure on
abortion, gay       them to conform to attitudinal disposition accepted
                    by the group. Thus, interests and behaviours of
                  • individuals are often subjected to modification to
e varieties of
                    reflect that of the group in order to be accepted
m Catholics
                    by its members.
~ration   while
Lgh this con-       5. Occupation: Occupational and professional
e denomina-         associations shape political attitudes of their mem-
urches. This        bers by promoting and intensifying occupational
tngs.               and class-related political values. Unions, profes-
                    sional associations, among others, are informa-
.1 system and
                    tion and communication channels for the cultiva-
 of socializa-
                    tion and expression of beliefs of members. The
lg childhood
                    group an individual identifies with is often used
mnot be un-
                    as a political reference point, as individual politi-
tion in which
                    cal actions are evaluated in line with what the
be socialized
                    group stands for. Involvement in demonstration,
ermore, after
                    strike and picketing in       wor~    places, championed
f peer groups
                    by organized labour unions may also influence
creases. The
                    an individual's behaviour when participating in
uals also be-
                    political activities.
e when they
tructure, feel-     Mass media: It has been the age of revolution in
                    information technology. Hardly- can any society
                                            255
Introductory Text In Political Science
           function properly without effective network of            divis
          communication. In fact, it is no gainsay that the          ence:
           mass media - television, radio, newspaper and             or s11
           magazines and the internet - play a key role in           ernrr
           providing information about political events and          supp
           the major values on which a society agrees. For           the r
           most people, the mass media are their major               7. Tl
           sources of information, and by the media their            ment
           political views and beliefs are formed.                   its ac
           6. Political Parties: Political parties play a delib-     good
           erate, key role in political socialization. Parties are   and 1,
           often noted for arousing apathetic disposition of         and ]
           people. Parties as well in their efforts at canvass-      posit
           ing and mobilizing support for electoral candidates       been
           mold their members' or people's issue preferences.        by tb
                                                                     unfai
           :Majority of people would not want to be active
                                                                     towar
           participants in political activities, but a steady flow
           of party campaigns and programmes, combined with          8. Ev
           the election every few years, inevitably keep citi-       have
           zens involved in political activities.                    some
                                                                     (uncia
           Here, it is essential to note that activities of po-
                                                                     discu
           litical parties can also be divisive. This is neces-
           sarily so when parties' strategies to gain support        9. Tl
           for their candidates often times come to involve          can c
           appeals to language, religion, ethnicity and other        anm<
                                         256
                                        Po litical, Socialization and Political Culture
: network of       divisive forces that certainly emphasize differ-
nsay that the      ences among people. Conversely, in communist
wspapcr and        or single-party system parties can be used by gov-
a key role in      ernments to inculcate common attitudes of unity,
al events and      support for government and shared ideologies of
y agrees. For      the ruling party.
    their major    7. The State: The state, represented by govern-
~   media their    ment, is also an agent of socialization. 1v1any of
ed.                its activities are intended to paint government in
: play a delib-    good image to the public so as to build support
m. Parties arc     and loyalty for the government in power. Almond
:lisposition of    and Powel (1988) averred that "no matter how
                   positive the view of the political system that has
ts at canvass-
,ral candidates    been taught in sch?ol, a citizen who is harassed
                   by the police, ignored by welfare agencies, or
te preferences.
                   unfairly taxed is unlikely to feel much warmth
t to be active
                   toward the authorities" (p. 39).
: a steady flow
::ombined with     8. Events: Major personal and social events may
1bly keep citi-    have notable impact on the political thinking of
                   some people. Those events according to Blass
                   (undated), can be classified into three. These arc
tivities of po-
                   discussed below.
This is neces-
J   gain support   9. The Life-Cycle Effect: Personal experience
me to involve      can change belief, behaviour and orientation of
city and other     an individual. For example, James Bradley, Presi-
                                       257
                                         I
Introductory Text In Political Science
           dent Reagan's          P~ess       Secretary, was shot and he
           became paralyzed in the assassination attempt
           against Reagan. Her wife Sarah Bradley suddenly
                                                                             Sc
           became a committed activist on legislation on gun
                                                                           cha1
           control as a result of the experience.
           10. Period-Effect: A major historical event can af-
           fect an entire society and create generational impact
           on public opinion. For example, it has been noted
           that "millions of Americans who lived through the
           Great Depression became life-long Democrats and
           have continued to view government as a positive
           force in     society'~    (Blass, undated).
           11. Cohort Effect: One historic event may have
           great impact on a specific group of people. Vietnam
           \\far, the hippie culture, and the Nixon presidency
           appeared to have had notable effects on many Ameri-
           cans approaching adulthood in the late 1960s.
                                                                           9.3
           Blass's classification, simply, establishes how. events
           can be a medium for political socialization.                      Ha
                                                                           agen
           12. Total Institutions: The last agent of social-
                                                                           relat
                       ' going to discuss briefly is what
           ization we are
                                                                           co no
           Abonyi (2006) described as the total institutions.              Gene
           Examples of total institutions are prisons, the                 parti
           military, IIfental hospitals and convents. The afore-           featu
                                             2~8
                                              Political, Socialization and Political Culture
ot and he               mentioned instih1tions are capable of re-socializ-
n attempt               ing people, either voluntarily or involuntarily.
y suddenly        Schaefer and Lamm (1992) highlighted the peculiar
on on gun        characteristics of the total instirutions:
                        1.     All aspects of life are conducted in the
·ent can af-            same place and under the same single authority;                        ~
mal impact
)een noted              ii.     Each phase of a member's daily activity is
nrough the              carried out in the immediate company of others.
1ocrats and             All members are treated alike and all members
. a positive            do the same thing together;
                        iii.    Daily activities are tightly scheduled. All
:may have               activity is super-imposed upon the individual by
le. Vietnam             a system of explicit formal rules; and
    presidency          1v.     A single rational plan exists to fulfill the
tanyAmeri-              goals of the instirution (cited in Abonyi, 2006).
l960s.
                 9.3 Political Socialization and Political Culture
how. events
lOll.              Having examined political socialization and its various
                 agents, it is pertinent to note that there exist a strong
t   of social-   relationship between political socialization and the
fly is what      concept of political culrure.So, what is political culrure?
nstitutions.     Generally speaking, political culture simply implies "a
·risons, the     particular distribution of political activities, values,
. The afore-     fearures, information and skills" (Almond & Powel, 1988,
                                             259
Introductory Text In Political Science
p. 40). It also refers to beliefs, values, attitudes, habits
and bahavioural patterns peculiar to a political system.
Thus, political culture touches the minds of people, using
psychoanalytic tools to search for the reasons of their
political behaviours and orientations (Haywood, 1997,
cited in Emamjomezadeh et al., 2012). It simply means:an
individual's political orientation and behaviour perhaps
have a cause and effect relationship with political
cultures, values and symbols, as Haywood(1997)
explained (cited in Emamjomezadeh et. al., 2012).
   It appears that for a society to succeed in maintaining
its political culture it must sustain the process of political
socialization accessing cultural transfer channels of the
society, through which such set of values that contribute
to political stability and solidity are obtained and improved
upon. Through political socialization people acquire
political culture, ind their orientations toward political
objectives are therebyformed, to put           iE   succinctly. For
instance, individuals' views on subordination and
                             '
cooperation and protesting and defiance are all influenced
by thefamily. Arguments or violent quarrels among
members of a family about policies and politicalculture
can inform a child's particular attitude toward the political
system (Agarwal & Bhushan, 1991).
   Nevertheless, political socialization in Africa seemsto
differ from that of the West. This is premised on the
                                         260
                                               Political, Socialization and Political Culture
                  fact that the process of political socialization in the
~udes,   habits
                  continent of Africa is often attended with turbulent and
ical system.
                  dramatic changes, brought about by the nature of
Jeople, using
ons of their      thesociety and the structure of itspolitics. In fact, for
wood, 1997,       each succeeding generationin Africasocialization forces
ply means:an      appear radically different. This problem is exacerbated
our perhaps       by several sharply different agents and ways of political
ith political     learning in the continent - namely the family, school,
vood(1997)        places of worship, streets, and so on, transmitting highly
2012).            diverse and divergent political lessons and information.
                  It has also been noted for instance that in African families,
 maintammg
                  there is no sense of partisan alignment or party
;s of political
                  identification to be either transmitted or ideological
mnels of the
                  orientation originating in the family. The structure of
at contribute
                  the family is not comparable to the \Vestern nuclear
.nd improved
                  family as many African children live with relatives either
ople acquire
                  as a result of financial difficulties, extended family ties,
vard political
                  or to further their studies in urban areas if their parents
Lccinctly. For
                  live in rural areas. The implication is that children are
ination and
                  exposed to political knowledge beyond the confines of
all influenced
                  their biological parents (Almond & Powel, 1988).
rrels among
Jliticalculture
                  9.4 How Political Culture is Formed
d the political
                    Formation of political culture comes in four stages:
 frica seemsto    politicization; cognition and recognition; the example
                  stage; and the internalization phase (Giddens, 1990).
 mised on the
                                              261
Introductory Text In Political Science
          1. Politicization: The first stage is politicization,
           a stage when the child makes effort to know ·the
           political arena. This could be by listening to
           thoughts and ideas of ' parents, teachers and oth-
           ers about government. The child thus sees him-
           self as a political being and becomes conscious
           of the existence of government.
          2. Cognition and Recognition: The second stage
          is cognition and recognition, when a child is at
          friction \Vith the political system, and understands
          some forms of political domination or domina-
          tion in the general sense. I'riction vvith the politi-
          cal system may also be in form of a child trying
          to make a choice between conflicting political
          ideas. For instance, parents and religious instruc-
           tors may teach a child that government is bad,
          while teachers at school emphasize that govern-
          ment is benevolent and that it is the responsibil-
          ity of citizens to be loyal to it.
          3. The Example Stage: The third stage is the
          example stage, when the child turns to judge val-
          ues and certain manners, and through them ne-
          gates or demands judgment on the existing forms
          of domination and politics (as a whole).
          4. Internalization: The fourth stage is the inter-
                                         262
                                                   Political, Socialization and Political Culture
is politicization,            nalization phase in which the individual transcends
ott to know .the              understanding some established political forms
by listening to               and starts value-judging the entire constituents
~achers   and oth-            of the political system. It is in this stage that a
1 thus sees him-              particular kind of political culture is formed by
omes consc1ous                each individual.
                       9.5 Types of Political Culture
The second stage
1en a child is at       Four (4) types of political culture have been identified.
and understands        They are: parochial culture, subject culture, participatory
tion or domina-        culture, and sub-culture (Almond & Powel, 1988).
1   with the politi-
                              1. Parochial Culture: Here with the parochial
of a child trying
                              culture citizens have vague or no awareness, ex-
flicting political
                              pectations, participation and orientation towards
religious instruc-
                              any political object or political system. They nei-
rernmen t is bad,
                              ther expect anything positive from government
3ize that govern-
                              nor do they expect to participate in the political
; the responsibil-
                              process. Politics is seen as the exclusive domain
                              of the elite and government is viewed as enforcer
:hird stage is the            of the rules it made.
ttns to judge val-
                              2. Subject Culture: Unlike the parochial culture
Jtough them ne-
                              in which citizens have no cognitive orientation
he existing forms
                              towards some aspects of or the entire political
    whole).
                              system, with the subject culture, citizens see them-
stage is the inter-           selves more or less as subjects of governments.
                                                  263
Introductory Text In Political Science
          Although they expect positive actions from gov-
          ernment, thcv do not sec themselves as active                      1
          participants in the political process.                      Nl
          3. Participatory Culture: with the participatory                   i
          culture, citizens have cognitive orientation of dif-        Po.
          ferent parts of the political system as well as the                j
          entire political system. In societies "\Vith partici-
                                                                     To.
          patory political culture, the citizens tend to ex-
                                                                     Cc
          pect more from government, believe they can
                                                                         j
          contribute to the workings of the system and that
          they affect the system as much as the system af-           Pri
          fects them. This type of culture is an essential           Re
          principle of any democratic society.                       po
          4. Sub-Culture: ,1\Jmond and Verba (1963) deftned              E
          political sub-culture as "the type of political cul-       M..
          ture persisting in formally merged traditional units"      bet
          (p. 27). Generally speaking, political sub-culture         Ira
          simply means culture of a social group that can be         C01
         distinguished from the dominant one in a given                  (
         political system. It is a set of political attitudes and   Na:
         orientations of a small gnmp within a political sys-
                                                                         ]\
         tem different from the over arching one in the
                                                                    Gn
         larger polity. Although members of a sub-culture
         share in the political culture of the larger society,        0
         they have their own peculiar sub-cultural charac-          zn
         teristics that are very strong.                            Ah:
                                                                    Pul::
                                         264
                                                  Political, Socialization and Political Culture
ns from gov-                                REFERENCES
ves as acuvc          Abonyi, N.N. (2006).Political Science: A FundamentalApproach.
                     Nkpokiti, Enugu: John Jacob's Classic Publishers Ltd.
: participatory       Agarwal, N.N, & Bhushan, V.B. (1991) .Principles of
1tation of dif-      Political Science(13th ed.).New Delhi: R. Chand & Co.
as well as the        Almond, G.A.,& Powel, G.B. (1988).Comparative Politics
, with partici-      Todqy, A Wor/dview (4th ed.). London: Scot, Foresman&
 s tend to cx-       Company.
ieve they can
                      Almond, G.A.,& Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture.
1stem and that
                     Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press. Blass, R. (n.d.).
the system a f-
s an essen rial      Retrieved from http: richblass.com/ downloads/
y.
                     poli tical%20socialization. pdf.
                      Emamjomezadeh, SJ., Mahmoodoghli, R, Rahbargazi,
  (1963) defmcd
                     M.,& Keshavarz, H. (2012). Investigating the relationship
 f political cul-
                     between political culture and political socialization (in
J.ditional units"
:al sub-culture      Iran (Case study of Isfahan)). Interdisciplinary Journal                o/
'up that can be      Contemporary Research in Business, 3(12), pp. 357-363.
)ne in a given         Giddens, A. (1990). Sociology(M. Sabori, Trans.). Tehran:
1l attitudes and     Nahre Ney.
_a political sys-
                      Nnoli, 0. (1990).Introduction to Politics.Essex: Longman
lllg one in the
                     Group Ltd.
f a sub-culture
                       Onwuka, J. 0. (1997)Agents and Process
                                                          Socialization   o/
:: larger society,
:ult:ura1 charac-    in Traditional Nigeria 0.0. Onwuka & S.C.
                     Ahaiwe,Eds.).Nigeria Heritage: Okigwe Whytem
                     Publishers, Nigeria.
                                                 265
9 789780 573305 >