0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

Cogpsych w15

The document discusses various methods of memory retention, emphasizing that maintenance rehearsal is less effective for long-term memory compared to elaborative rehearsal, which involves making meaningful connections. It also highlights the importance of the level of processing theory, self-reference effect, and retrieval cues in enhancing memory recall. Additionally, it covers the benefits of spaced practice, retrieval practice, and matching encoding conditions to retrieval conditions for improved memory performance.

Uploaded by

athu622
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

Cogpsych w15

The document discusses various methods of memory retention, emphasizing that maintenance rehearsal is less effective for long-term memory compared to elaborative rehearsal, which involves making meaningful connections. It also highlights the importance of the level of processing theory, self-reference effect, and retrieval cues in enhancing memory recall. Additionally, it covers the benefits of spaced practice, retrieval practice, and matching encoding conditions to retrieval conditions for improved memory performance.

Uploaded by

athu622
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Maintenance rehearsals

Helps maintain information in STM/WM. But it is not an effective way of


transferring information into LTM

 Keeping information information alive at the mind


 Useful for short term action

Elaborative rehearsal

 Occurs when you think about the meaning of an item and make
connections between the item and something you know
 More effective at transferring info to LTM
o Visualize the drink
o Relate it to an altered version of something u usually order
o Taste it when she’s not looking
o Practice retrieving the order
o Write it down (even if you don’t look at the writing later)

Level of processing theory

 Craik & lockhart 1972


o Memory depends upon the depth of processing that an item
receives
o Shallow processing= little attention to meaning (highlighting
notes for class)
o Deep processing= close attention, meaning, relating it to other
things
 3 conditions for remembering word lists (craik % Tulving 1975)
1) Is word printed in capital letters (shallow)
2) Does it rhyme w word xxxx (deep processing)
3) Does it fit into this sentence
a. E.g. he saw a ___ on the street (deepest processing, you have to
understand the word to know if it fits in the sentence

Levels of processing theory

Research showing encoding influences retrieval

Forming visual images- boat tree, if you can form an image, it can help
your memory with something
 Draw an image of what it looks like, to generate what it
would look like in your head

2. linking words to yourself


Self- reference effect

 Memory is better if you are asked to relate a word to yourself

Rogers et. Al 1977

1. Participants read a question for sec


2. Then, they were presented w a word
3. Respond yes if word was answer to question, no if word wasn’t
4. Word recall test.

Ex. Participants were more likely to remember words that they rated as
describing themselves.

 Relate things you’ve learned in this class to things that happened to


you before, helps

Generating information

 You are more likely to remember information that you generate during
study than information that you simply try to remember.
 Why? Mental activity at time of study promotes future recall.
o Having questions generated for you would not help you as much
as you thinking about the questions yourselves.
 Any ideas that you generate during study can serve as retrieval cues
when you need to remember the information later.

Organizing information

 Jenkins &Russell
 Participants spontaneously organize items as they recall them
 List of words- random words apple, hammer, cloud, tree, screwdriver,
orange. Grass
 Retrieval cue- a word or other stimulus that helps a person remember
information stored in memory
o The keys- the meaning, or organization, ends up as a cue for
things that end up in the list.
Spacing/ variability

 Massed practice= practice concentrated within time


 Spaced practice= practice spread out over several sessions
o Better long term retention
o Learning occurs in a shorter amount of practice time
 Constant practice= repeatedly practicing the same skill under the
same conditions
 Variable practice= practicing a skill in varied conditions
o Can lead to better performance, especially when there is a
variability in retrieval

Retrieval practice/ testing

 Which results in a stronger memory?


o Re-reading the material
o Being tested on the material
 Tsting memories strengthened memories, i.e. it increaesed the
likelihood of retrievin the memories at a later time
o This is true regardless ofwhether the subject succeeds in
retrieving the information at the timeof (practice) testing!
 Roediger &karpicke

 Not much of a difference after 5 minute delay


 Testing produces better memory (than rereading) after 2 days& 1 week
delay
 Testing effect= enhanced performance due to testing

Retrieval: getting info out of Long term memory

 Remember encoding? Organizing information?


o The word apple’ might serve as a retrieval cue for other fruit
cords. Eg. Grape
 People, locations, songs, smells, anything! Can be a retrieval cue

Simple example of the effectiveness of retrievavl cues: free recall

Encode these words into memory

Free recall- recalling words without any cues

Cue recall- recalling words with some cues

Recognition- recognizing the word list within a bunch of other words

Matching conditions at encoding and retrieval

 Retrieval success can be increased by matching the conditions at


retrieval to the conditions that existed at enconding
o Endoing specificity (context)
o State dependent learning (itnernal mood, etc)
o Transfer- appropriate processing (matching task)

Encoding specificity- information is encoded wiith contextual information


automatically

 Godden & baddeley


o Diving experiment
 Partipants memorized a list of spoken worrds
o On land
o Or under water
 ½ switched locations & /2 stayed during test

 Participants recalled more in the enironment they encoded in

State dependent learning

 Information is better retrieved when the internal state at retrieval


matches the internal state at encoding
 Eich& metcalfe
o Induced positive or negative moods before word list learning
 Lsitening to sad happy music& thinking sad/ happy
thoughts
o Two days later, same procedure used to induve positive or
negative moods
 More is retrieved if the state at retrieval matches that of encoding

Transfer- appropriate processing

 Information retrieval is enhanved in taskes that match tasks in which


information was encoded.
 Morris, branford,, & franks
o Encoding conditions
1. Meaning condition (task focused on meaning of word)
2. Rhyming condition (task focused on sound of the word)
 All participants heard a sentence w 1 word replaced by the word
“blank”, 2 second pause, target word.
1. Sentence provided- the___ had a silver engine (target word:hound)
2. ___ rhymes w legal (target word: regal)

Morris et al.

 For retrieval, all participants had a rhyming recognition task

Encoding retrieval
Meaning task rhyming recognition test 33%

Rhying task rhyming recognition test 49%

1) Maching encoding and retrival tasks results in better retrieval


2) “Deeper processing” meaning and variability at enoding does not
always result in better retrieval

You might also like