ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
An Efficient HPF LED Driver with Zero
Voltage Switching
Asha Lekshmi R.1, Anoopraj M. R.2
PG Student [Power Electronics], Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering , St. Joseph’s College of
Engineering and Technology, Palai, India1
Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering , St. Joseph’s College of Engineering and
Technology, Palai, India2
ABSTRACT: Lighting is an important aspect of energy consumption. It consumes about 25% of the world's total
electric energy production. Light Emitting Diode (LED) technology has now emerged promising technology to replace
conventional lighting devices. LEDs are highly efficient, energy conserving and eco-friendly. The applications of LEDs
include in mobile products, and back lighting of Liquid Crystal Display(LCD) panels. LED drivers utilize an AC input
source; Power Factor Correction (PFC) control must be imposed in the driver to achieve a high Power Factor (PF). This
is a novel two stage LED driver. It consists of a buck-boost converter and a buck converter. The buck-boost converter
which serves as a PFC converter to achieve a High Power Factor and low current ripples. The buck converter step
down the dc-link voltage to drive high power white LEDs. Operating the active switches at Zero Voltage
Switching(ZVS) can effectively reduce the power losses. To achieve the PFC function, it should be designed to operate
at Discontinuous-Conduction Mode (DCM). The buck converter can be designed to operate at either Continuous-
Conduction Mode (CCM) or DCM. Operating a buck converter at CCM has the advantage of small current ripple but,
it requires using an inductor of higher value than that at DCM. This High Power Factor(HPF) LED driver topology will
reduce the switching losses by using soft switching technique and improves power factor to almost unity.A prototype of
the topology with 25 V input voltage and four 12 V, 10 W high power LEDs is tested and it works properly. Dimming
is automatically adjusted by using a Light Dependent Resistor(LDR) of diameter 5mm. Simulation is done in
MATLAB. dsPIC30F2010 and ATMEGA 328P are used in control schemes.
KEYWORDS:Buck boost converter,Buck converter,Light Emitting Diode(LED),Power Factor Correction(PFC),Zero
Voltage Switching(ZVS).
I.INTRODUCTION
LEDs are the fast emerging technology and have a wide range of applications. Due to the increased popularity of
LEDs, the LED driver design should be simple [1]. The LED driver may be a single stage driver or a two stage driver.
The single-stage approaches are derived by integrating the PFC converter and the DC/DC converter. By sharing one
active switch and the control circuit, the single-stage converters have the advantages of less component count and are
cost effective solutions. They are less expensive. The two-stage approach includes a PFC semi-stage to shape the input
current into a sinusoidal waveform and a DC/DC semi-stage to regulate the output voltage. These two-stage approaches
have the advantages of good performance, fast output dynamic response, and easy control. They require two power-
conversion processes and are energy inefficient [2-8]. There are many topologies using single stage and two stage
converters based on different applications. In both single stage and two stage converters, the active switches are
operated in hard switching mode. Hard switching increases the switching losses.
Hence the objectives are to improve the power factor of the LED driver system for economical operation and to reduce
switching losses by using a suitable technique. To reduce the switching losses soft switching techniques can be
employed. By using zero voltage switching, i.e, the voltage across the device is reduced to zero before the current
increases, along with the help of phase shift full bridge PWM converter switching losses can be reduced. Therefore, a
new two stage topology can be introduced which will improve the PF and reduces the switching losses. A buck
converter can be used to drive the LEDs with required voltage [9-11].The circuit configuration and operation of the
proposed topology is given in section II. Section III deals with detail circuit analysis. An illustrative design example
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7214
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
and MATLAB simulation results are given in section IV. Section V is the hardware implementation and obtained
waveforms. Section VI gives the conclusion of this paper.
II.CIRCUIT CONFIGURATION AND OPERATION
Fig. 1 shows the block diagram of the proposed topology. It consists of a diode bridge rectifier, buck-boost converter
and a buck converter.
Fig.1. Block Diagram
The diode bridge rectifier converts the input AC voltage to DC. The buck-boost converter performs the function of
PFC, and the buck converter steps down the dc-link voltageto drive LEDs. Both active switches can operate at Zero-
VoltageSwitching-on (ZVS) to effectively reduce the switching losses.To achieve the PFC function, it should be
designed to operate at Discontinuous-Conduction Mode (DCM). The buck converter can be designed to operate either
in Continuous-Conduction Mode (CCM) or in Dis-continuous Conduction Mode (DCM).Continuous-Conduction Mode
(CCM)has the advantage of small current ripple. At the same time an inductor of higher value is required for operation.
Hence the latter method is preferred. The circuit diagram for the proposed topology is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig.2. Circuit Diagram
The first stage is a buck-boost converter consists of diodes D5 and DS1, an active switch S2, two coupled inductor Lp1
and Lp2, and a dc-link capacitor Cdc. It serves as the PFC circuit by wave shaping the input current to be sinusoidal and
in phase with the input line voltage. The second stage is a buck converter consisting of diodes D6 and Ds2, an active
switch S1, an inductor Lb, and a capacitor C0. Diode D6 is used to block the reverse current of buck inductor and can be
removed when the buck converter is operated at CCM. Instead of using a single inductor, two coupled inductors along
with a blocking diode (D3) are used to accomplish buckbuck-boost conversion. The turnsratioof the two coupled
inductors is designed to induce voltage on Lp2 to block the current from the line source.A small low-pass filter, Lm and
Cm, is used to remove the highfrequency current harmonics at the input line. MOSFETs S1 and S2 are the bidirectional
switches. Each switch is composed of a transistor and an anti-parallel diode. The MOSFET’s intrinsic body diodes D1
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7215
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
and D2 are used as the anti-parallel diodes. For dimming operation, the active S3 is placed in series with the LED string.
Switch S3is controlled by the scheme of low-frequency pulse-width modulation. The active switches S1and S2 are
alternately driven by two gated signals, vGS1 and vGS2. They are non-overlapping and complementary rectangular-wave
voltages with a short dead time at the high switching frequency fs. The dead time is the time interval when vGS1 and
vGS2 are both zero. Neglecting the short dead time, the duty cycle of vGS1 and vGS2 is 0.5. For simplifying the circuit
analysis, the following assumptionsare made:
All the circuit components are ideal.
Vdc and Vo can be regarded as constant voltage sources.
The input low-pass filter formed by Lm and Cm and the diode bridge rectifier can be replaced with the voltage Vrec. The
output LED string can be replaced with its equivalent resistance RLED. At steady state, the circuit operation can be
divided into six modes in each high-frequency cycle. For simplifying the circuit analysis, the low-pass filter and the
diode rectifier (D1- D4) is represented by the rectified voltage Vrec and the LED string is represented by its equivalent
resistance RLED. Fig. 3 shows the six modes of operation. The circuit operation is described as follows.
Fig.3. Modes of Operation
A. Mode I (t0<t<t1)
This mode begins as soon as S1 is turned OFF. The current ib diverts from S1 to DS2. The voltage across the buck
inductor is equal to V0 and ib starts to decrease from a peak value. At the same time, the voltage across the buck-boost
inductor Lp1 is equal to the rectified input voltage VrecSince the buck-boostconverter is designed to operate at DCM, the
buck-boost current ip1 increases linearly from zero with a rising slope thatis proportional to Vrec. The theoretical
waveforms of buck converter are shown in Fig. 4. In the initial stage of this mode, ib is higher than ip1. Parts of ib flow
through DS2, while the rest of ib is equal to ip1 and flows through Lp1, diode bridge rectifier and the line-voltage source.
Since DS2 is on, the voltage across S1is clamped at -0.7 V. After the short dead time, vGS2 becomes a high level.Switch
S2 does not conduct current until the rising current ip1 becomes higher than the decreasing current ib and then, thecircuit
operation enters Mode II.
B. Mode II (t1<t<t2)
In this mode, S2 is on and ip1 is higher than ib. There are two current loops. Parts of ip1are equal toib and flows through
D6, Lb, Co, Lp1 and the line-voltage source, while the rest flows throughLp1 and the line-voltage source.The voltage
equations for vb and vp1 are the same as those in Mode I. The current ib keeps decreasing. Now ip1 keeps increasing.
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7216
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
Ifthe buck converter operates at DCM, the circuit operation entersMode III as soon as ib decreases to zero. If it operates
atCCM, the circuit operation enters Mode IV at the instant timeof turning OFF S2. The current ib is zero. S2 is kept at on
stage and ip1 keeps increasing. This mode ends at the instant time of turning OFF S2 and the circuit operation enters
Mode IV.
Fig.4. Waveforms
C. Mode III (t2<t<t3)
The current ib is zero. S2is kept at on stage and ip1 keepsincreasing. This mode ends at the instant time of turning off
S2,and the circuit operation enters Mode IV.
D. Mode IV (t3<t<t4)
At the beginning of this mode, ip1 reaches a peak value. Inorder to ensure the buck-boost converts ip1 on operation,
ip1should be diverted from S2 and flows through Lp1, Lp2, D5, and DS1to charge the dc-link capacitor Cdcwhen S2 is
turned OFF. For this, the voltage across the inductor Lp2 must be higher than the amplitude of the input voltage to block
the current from the ac line source. By this way, the diode-bridge rectifier is reverse-biased. Currents ip1and ip2 will be
equal and flow through diode D5 Current ip1drops and ip2 rises dramatically at the switching-off instant. The negative
dc-link voltage is imposed on the coupled inductors, and both ip1and ip2 decrease linearly. Regarding operation of the
buck converter, since DS1 is on,the voltage across Lb is equal to Vdc-VO and, ib rises linearly. In the initial stage of this
mode, ip1 (ip2) is higher than ib. Parts of ip1 flow through DS1 to charge Cdc, while the rest of ip1is equal to ib and flow
into the buck converter. Since DS1is on, the voltage across S1is clamped at -0.7 V. After the short dead timevGS1
becomes a high level. S1does not conduct current until the rising current ib becomes higher than the decreasing current
ip1, and then the circuit operation entersMode V.
E. Mode V (t4<t<t5)
In this mode, S1is on and ib is higher than ip1. There are twocurrent loops. Parts of ib are supplied from the dc-link
voltage and the rest of ib is equal to ip1and flow through Lp1, Lp2, and D5. Both the currents ip1and ip2keep decreasing.
The circuit operation enters Mode VI when ip1and ip2 decrease to zero.
F. Mode VI (t5<t<t6)
In this mode, S1is remained at on stage and ib keeps increasinglinearly. This mode ends at the time when vGS1 becomes
to a low level to turn OFF S1, and the circuit operation returns to Mode I of the next cycle.
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7217
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
III. DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
The anti-paralleldiode of the active switch of one converter serves as the freewheeling diode of the other converter, the
features of the buck-boost and the buck converter can be retained. Therefore, the two converters can be analyzed
separately. An LED driver for 4, 10 W white LEDs is illustrated as a design example. Table 1 shows the circuit
specifications and are obtained by using the below equations.
Table 1: Circuit Specifications
Input voltage 25 V
High switching frequency 50 kHz
Low switching frequency 200 Hz
Output power 40 W
Output voltage 48 V
Output current 0.8 A
LED voltage 12 V
LED current 0.8 A
LED equivalent resistance 3200 Ω
The input voltage is 25 V. The forward voltage drop for 1 LED is 12 V. Hence the output voltage for 4 LEDs is 48 V.
From output power and output voltage, the output current can be calculated. The equivalent LED resistance can be
obtained from output voltage and output current.Table 2 gives the circuit parameters.
Table 2: Circuit Parameters
Filter inductor 2 mH
Filter capacitor 0.47 µF
Switches IRFP250
Buck inductor 1.94 mH
Coupled inductors(buck boost inductor) 0.46 mH
DC link capacitor 100 µF
Buck capacitor 100 µF
A. Buck- boost converter
In the operation from Mode I to Mode III, either S2 or DS2 is on, the rectified voltagevrec supplies energy to raise the
current ip1. Since the buck-boostconverter is operated at DCM, ip1raises from zero at the beginning of Mode I and
reaches a peak value at the end of Mode III. The input voltage is given by,
( )= sin (1)
The input current can be calculated by integrating the current irec over one cycle. It is given by,
( )= sin t (2)
From the above two equations, it is clear that input currentis a sinusoidal waveform and it is in phase with input
voltage. Hence a HPF is achieved.The input power is given as:
( )= (3)
The output power is given by
( )= × (4)
With a 92% efficiency, the value of Lp1 can be obtained. The value of Lp2 and Lp1 are equal.
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7218
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
B. Buck converter
The on time of the buck converter is the interval from the beginning of operation Mode IV to the end of Mode VI.
During this interval, either S1 or DS1 is on. Hence, the duty ratio of the buck converter is also 0.5. At steady-state
operation, the average value of ib is equal to LED current. For fulfilling DCM operation, Vdc should be less than or
equal to 2Vo. The buck inductor Lb can be designed by using the equation:
( )
( )= (5)
By diverting the current in one active switch to the anti-parallel diode of the other one is what enables the active
switches to achieve ZVS operation. By this way, the anti-parallel diode conducts current prior to the transistor in each
MOSFET. The voltage across the transistor is maintained at about -0.7 V when its anti-parallel is on. This small voltage
is negligible and the transistor can be turned ON at zero voltage. It means that the turn-on switching loss is effectively
eliminated.
IV. SIMULATION AND HARDWARE DEVELOPMENT
This section deals with the simulation waveforms and hardware details of the LED driver topology.
A. Simulation Waveforms
Fig. 8 shows the input voltage and current waveforms.From the figure the input voltage is 25 V. The input voltage and
input current are inphase. Magnitude of input current is less than 1A. Current and voltage waveforms for the switch
S1and S2 are shown in the Fig. 9 and gate pulses for the three switches are also shown in the same figure.
Fig. 8 Input and Output Waveforms
Fig. 9 Waveforms of switches and their gate pulses
The gate pulses shows that switches are operated complementary. Duty cycle is 46% and it is same for both the two
switches and the switching frequency is 50 kHz. A short dead time is provided. The voltage across the DC- link
capacitor Cdc is given in Fig. 10 and current through the primary and secondary winding of coupled inductor is also
given in the same figure. According to design criteria magnitude of capacitor voltage should be less than 2Vo and
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7219
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
greater than Vo. Here the magnitude is 58 V. Gating pulses for switch S3 is shown in Fig. 9.Dimming is done in the
output by using the switch S3 and dimming can be controlled with respect to the intensity oflight in the room.
Fig. 10 Inductor currents and DC- link capacitor voltage
Voltage corresponding to the light intensity in room is scaled by using a factor 20.The output voltage and current
waveforms for 20% dimming is shown in Fig. 8. The output voltage and current contains less ripples.
B. Hardware Development
This section deals with the experimental results of the prototype having four 12 V, 10 W LEDs and an input voltage of
25 V. The prototype is shown in Fig. 11. Three MOSFET switches are used here.
Fig. 11 Prototype Test Circuit
The input to the prototype is 25 V AC and is connected to the mains through a single phase auto transformer.A single
phase step down transformer of rating 230/ 9 V is used for giving supply to the control circuits.The transformer has 4
isolated secondary windings and they are connected to 4 rectifier units. There are three switches in the topology.
Fig. 12 Input Waveforms
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7220
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
Fig. 13 Gate pulses for the three switches
Fig. 14 Voltage across switches 1 and 2
Fig. 15 Outputvoltage at different duty cycles
Two of them (S1and S2) are complementary switches. The digital signal controller dsPIC30F2010 is used for
controlling these switches. Gating pulses are generated according to the program written in MPLAB. Working voltage
of dsPIC is only 3 V and it is insufficient for driving the switches. Hence an optically isolated gate driver TLP250 is
used for this purpose.Three gate driver IC's are required for three active switches. A voltage regulator LM317 is used to
drive dsPIC which reduces the 12 V to 3 V. The 4 secondary windings of single phase transformer are connected to
three gate driver IC's and to LM317. The input voltage and current waveforms are given in Fig. 12. Gate pulses for the
two switches are shown in Fig. 13. Voltage across the switches 1 and 2 are given in Fig.14. The light intensity at
the output is varied with the help of a LDR. Therefore the experiment is conducted in absence and presence of day
light. Pulses for switch S3 with 91% is shown in Fig. 12. In a dark room brightness of the LED array is more and is
shown in Fig. 15. Output voltage in the day light is given in same figure. Comparing these experimental results with the
theoretical waveforms, we can see the shape of all the waveforms are identical to the theoretical waveforms.
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7221
ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 8, August 2015
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
By comparing the input voltage and current waveforms as shown in Fig. 8, it is clear that they are inphase and there by
power factor is improved. FFT analysis for input current is given in Fig. 16. There is only 21% of third harmonics in
input current and higher order harmonics are less than 3%.
Fig. 16 FFT Analysis for Input Current
For getting better results, dsPIC control can be replaced by fuzzy logic or FPGAaccording to the needs and
improvement in the circuit. Based on the application, the LED array can be arranged in different manner [13-16]. For
indoor lighting applications only a few numbers of LEDs are required. The same topology can be used for outdoor
lighting with more number of high power LEDs.
VI.CONCLUSION
This is a novel two stage LED driver. It consists of a buck-boost converter and abuck converter. The buck-boost
converter which serves as a PFC converter is operated at DCM toachieve a high power factor and low current THD.
The buck convertersteps down the dc-link voltage to drive high power whiteLEDs. The circuit operation is described,
and design equationsare derived. For achieving the design goals of high power factorand ZVS operation, the output
voltage cannot be lower than theamplitude of input voltage. Both active switches can achieve ZVS. Automatic
dimming operation is achieved by controlling the duty ratioof the active switch S3 with the help of a LDR. A prototype
of 48 V, 40 W is tested and simulation results are obtained by using MATLAB. THD is 22%.
REFERENCES
[1] Rafael A. Pinto, Marcelo R. Cosetin, Alexandre Campos, Marco A. Dalla Costa “Compact emergency Lamp Using Power LEDs” IEEE Trans.
Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1728, April. 2012
[2] S. Wang, X. Ruan, K. Yao, S. C. Tan, Y. Yang, and Z. Ye, “A flicker free electrolytic capacitor-less ac–dc LED driver IEEE Trans.-Power-
Electron., vol. 27, no.11, pp. 4540–4548,Nov. 2012.
[3] Y. C. Li and C. L. Chen, “A novel single-stage high-power-factor ac-to dc LED driving circuit with leakage inductance energy recycling,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 793–802, Feb. 2012.
[4] Banoth Govind Nayak, Harinath saggu, “Implementation of a Zero-Voltage-Switching and Zero-CurrentSwitching Interleaved Boost and
Buck Converter” ijecs Volume 3, Issue 10 October, 2014 Page No. 9017-9026
[5] C. S. Moo, K. H. Lee, H. L. Cheng, and W. M. Chen, “A single-stage high power-factor electronic ballast with ZVS buck-boost conversion,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1136–1146, Apr. 2009.
[6] M. A. D. Costa, J. M. Alonso, J. Cardes´ın, J. Garc´ıa, and D. G. Lamar, “A single-stage high-power-factor electronic ballast based on
integrated buck flyback converter to supply metal halide lamps,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1112–1122, Mar. 2008.
[7] X. Xie, M. Ye, Y. Cai, and J. Wu, “An optocouplerless two-stage high power factor LED driver,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf.,
2011, pp. 2078–2083.
[8] F. Zhang, J. Ni, and Yi Yu, “High power factor ac–dc LED driver with film capacitors,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 10 pp
4831–4848, Oct. 2013
[9] P. Athalye, M. Harris, and G. Negley, “A two-stage LED driver for high performance ehigh voltage LED fixtures,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power
Electron. Conf., 2012, pp. 2385–2391.
[10] J. H. Lee, D. H. Yu, J. G. Kim, Y. H. Kim, S. C. Shin, D. Y. Jung, Y. C. Jung, and C. Y. Won, “Auxiliary switch control of a bidirectional
soft-switching dc/dc converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28 no. 12, pp. 5446–5457, Dec. 2013.
[11] J. J.Yun, H. J. Choe,Y. H.Hwang,Y. K. Park, and B. Kang, “Improvement of power-conversion efficiency of a dc–dc boost converter using a
passive snubber circuit,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1808–1814 Apr. 2012.
Copyright to IJAREEIE DOI: 10.15662/ijareeie.2015.0408094 7222