0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views10 pages

British Empire Acts in India (1773-1858)

The document outlines the consolidation of the British Empire in India from 1773 to 1858, focusing on the transition of the East India Company from a trading entity to a political power. It details key legislative acts such as the Regulating Act of 1773, Pitt's India Act of 1784, and the Charter Acts, which progressively increased British parliamentary control over the Company and redefined governance in India. The summary highlights the impact of these acts on the administrative structure, legal jurisdiction, and socio-economic dynamics in British India.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views10 pages

British Empire Acts in India (1773-1858)

The document outlines the consolidation of the British Empire in India from 1773 to 1858, focusing on the transition of the East India Company from a trading entity to a political power. It details key legislative acts such as the Regulating Act of 1773, Pitt's India Act of 1784, and the Charter Acts, which progressively increased British parliamentary control over the Company and redefined governance in India. The summary highlights the impact of these acts on the administrative structure, legal jurisdiction, and socio-economic dynamics in British India.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

‭(History)‬

‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Pointer Notes- Lecture 7‬

‭Topic‬‭- Consolidation of British Empire in India (Part‬‭1)- British Acts and Regulations (1773 - 1858)‬

‭Basic Understanding Required for This Lecture:‬


T‭ o‬ ‭grasp‬ ‭the‬ ‭content‬ ‭of‬ ‭this‬‭lecture,‬‭students‬‭must‬‭have‬‭a‬‭clear‬‭understanding‬‭of‬‭how‬‭the‬‭East‬‭India‬
‭Company‬ ‭(EIC)‬ ‭transitioned‬ ‭from‬ ‭being‬ ‭a‬ ‭trading‬ ‭enterprise‬ ‭to‬ ‭becoming‬ ‭a‬ ‭political‬ ‭power.‬ ‭This‬
‭transformation is covered in the chapter of Modern History titled‬‭“Rise of British Supremacy in India.”‬

‭Key Points to Understand:‬


‭●‬ ‭Transition from Commercial to Political Entity‬‭:‬
‭○‬ I‭ nitially, the EIC operated as a trading company focused on commerce.‬
‭○‬ ‭Over‬‭time,‬‭it‬‭evolved‬‭into‬‭a‬‭territorial‬‭and‬‭political‬‭power,‬‭with‬‭its‬‭primary‬‭focus‬‭shifting‬‭to‬
‭land annexation and administrative control.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Period up to the 1770s‬‭:‬
‭○‬ ‭By‬ ‭the‬ ‭1770s,‬ ‭the‬ ‭British‬ ‭had‬ ‭established‬ ‭their‬ ‭dominance‬ ‭over‬ ‭Bengal‬ ‭through‬ ‭the‬
‭decisive battles of‬‭Plassey (1757)‬‭and‬‭Buxar (1764)‬‭.‬
‭○‬ ‭Despite these victories, the EIC faced significant challenges:‬
‭■‬ ‭Bankruptcy‬‭due to the misuse of power.‬
‭■‬ ‭Rampant corruption among higher officials of the Company.‬
‭■‬ ‭Exploitation‬‭of‬‭trade‬‭privileges,‬‭such‬‭as‬‭the‬‭abuse‬‭of‬‭‘‬‭dastaks’‬ ‭(free‬‭trade‬‭passes)‬
‭for private gain.‬
‭●‬ ‭Intervention by the British Parliament‬‭:‬
‭○‬ ‭In‬ ‭response‬ ‭to‬ ‭these‬ ‭challenges,‬ ‭the‬ ‭British‬ ‭Parliament‬ ‭began‬‭implementing‬‭legislative‬
‭measures to regulate the EIC.‬
‭○‬ ‭Over‬ ‭a‬ ‭series‬ ‭of‬ ‭acts,‬ ‭the‬ ‭Parliament‬ ‭gradually‬ ‭curtailed‬ ‭the‬ ‭Company’s‬ ‭autonomy,‬
‭ultimately leading to its dissolution through the‬‭Government of India Act of 1858‬‭.‬

T‭ his‬ ‭understanding‬ ‭sets‬ ‭the‬ ‭stage‬ ‭for‬ ‭analyzing‬ ‭the‬ ‭EIC’s‬ ‭transition‬‭and‬‭the‬‭role‬‭of‬‭British‬‭policies‬‭in‬
‭reshaping India’s political landscape.‬

‭1‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Regulating Act of 1773‬


‭Background‬
‭●‬ D‭ ual Govt. of Bengal and rampant corruption prevailing.‬
‭●‬ ‭Looming Financial Crisis over the company‬‭.‬
‭Restructuring of the Company -‬
‭●‬ D‭ irect Parliamentary control over COD (Court of Directors) for the first time.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Act‬‭provided for payment of liberal salaries and prohibited immoral activities.‬
‭In India -‬
‭●‬ N‭ ew Presidency of Bengal created.‬
‭●‬ ‭Governor‬‭of‬‭Bengal‬‭as‬‭the‬‭“Governor‬‭General‬‭of‬‭Bengal”‬‭(Warren‬‭Hastings)‬‭+‬‭Executive‬‭Council‬‭(4‬
‭members)‬
‭●‬ ‭Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta (CJ + 3 Judges) (Sir Elijah Imphey)‬
‭Limitations‬
‭●‬ V‭ ague‬ ‭in‬ ‭many‬ ‭areas‬ ‭-‬ ‭Neither‬ ‭given‬ ‭the‬ ‭state‬ ‭a‬ ‭definite‬ ‭control‬ ‭over‬ ‭the‬ ‭company,‬ ‭nor‬ ‭the‬
‭company a definite control over the servants.‬

‭Amending Act (Act of Settlement 1781)‬


‭Background‬
‭●‬ P‭ assed‬‭to‬‭resolve‬‭conflicts‬‭regarding‬‭the‬‭Jurisdiction‬‭of‬‭Supreme‬‭Court‬‭which‬‭were‬‭left‬‭vague‬‭in‬
‭Regulating Act of 1773‬
‭Jurisdiction Exemptions -‬
‭●‬ G‭ G and Council, exempt from SC jurisdiction (Revenue Matters also exempted)‬
‭●‬ ‭SC Jurisdiction extended over all residents of Calcutta.‬
‭Regulatory Authority‬
‭●‬ ‭GG and council can make rules for Provincial Courts and councils.‬

T‭ his‬‭Act‬‭marks‬‭the‬‭first‬‭effort‬‭to‬‭delineate‬‭the‬‭executive‬‭and‬‭judiciary‬‭functions‬‭in‬‭India,‬‭clearly‬‭defining‬
‭their separate jurisdictions.‬

‭2‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Pitt's India Act of 1784‬


‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ P‭ assed in order to remove the weakness of the Regulating Act of 1773.‬
‭●‬ ‭To bring the company's administration in India under control of the British Parliament.‬
‭●‬ ‭It was the first time when Indian Territories under EIC were called as British Possessions in India‬
‭Main Provisions -‬
‭●‬ B‭ oard of Control - Political Affairs (New Establishment)‬
‭●‬ ‭Board of Directors - Power reduced to Commercial affairs only.‬
‭●‬ ‭GG Executive Council - Member reduced to 3 from 4 (Commander in Chief of army to be 1)‬
‭●‬ ‭Madras and Bombay Presidency were made subordinate to the Bengal Presidency.‬
‭●‬ ‭GG‬‭and‬‭council‬‭made‬‭subordinate‬‭to‬‭British‬‭Government‬‭-‬‭Forbidden‬‭to‬‭declare‬‭war‬‭without‬‭prior‬
‭sanction‬‭of‬‭Directors‬‭(‬‭I‬‭hope‬‭you‬‭remember‬‭the‬‭1st‬‭Anglo‬‭Maratha‬‭War‬‭and‬‭why‬‭treaty‬‭of‬‭Surat‬‭was‬
‭annulled‬‭)‬
‭Significance‬‭-‬
‭●‬ ‭Increased British Control - Board of Control shifted power from EIC to British Government.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ambiguity of Governance (Political and Commercial affairs not clearly demarcated)‬

‭Act of 1786‬
‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ B‭ ill passed to make Cornwallis accept the Governor Generalship of India.‬
‭●‬ ‭Cornwallis‬ ‭had‬ ‭a‬ ‭condition‬ ‭-‬‭He‬‭wanted‬‭the‬‭power‬‭of‬‭both‬‭authorities‬‭under‬‭GG‬‭only‬‭(GG‬‭and‬
‭Commander in Chief)‬
‭Main Provisions -‬
‭●‬ A‭ ct joined the offices of GG and Commander in Chief in the hands of GG.‬
‭●‬ ‭GG‬‭was‬‭further‬‭empowered‬‭and‬‭allowed‬‭to‬‭override‬‭the‬‭majority‬‭of‬‭his‬‭council‬‭in‬‭matters‬‭of‬‭War‬
‭and peace on his own responsibility.‬

‭3‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Charter Act of 1793‬


‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ ‭To codify laws to ensure that there was an impression of fairness and transparency in Governance.‬

‭Extension of Company’s charter -‬


‭○‬ E‭ xtended‬ ‭Company’s‬ ‭charter‬‭by‬‭20‬‭Years‬‭-‬‭maintaining‬‭its‬‭trade‬‭monopoly‬‭and‬‭political‬
‭control over India.‬
‭○‬ ‭GG now had the power to bypass Council’s decisions.‬
‭○‬ ‭Company‬ ‭was‬ ‭empowered‬ ‭to‬ ‭give‬ ‭licenses‬ ‭to‬ ‭individuals‬ ‭as‬ ‭well‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭company's‬
‭employees‬ ‭to‬ ‭trade‬ ‭in‬ ‭India.‬ ‭This‬ ‭trade‬ ‭especially‬ ‭in‬ ‭opium‬ ‭to‬ ‭China,‬ ‭was‬ ‭known‬ ‭as‬
‭‘‬‭Privilege or Country Trade‬‭’‬
‭○‬ ‭Codification‬‭of‬‭Laws‬‭-‬‭this‬‭act‬‭laid‬‭the‬‭foundation‬‭of‬‭Governance‬‭based‬‭on‬‭written‬‭laws‬‭in‬
‭British India in place of personal rules of past rulers.‬

‭4‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Charter Act of 1813‬


‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ B‭ ritain‬‭in‬‭midst‬‭of‬‭Industrial‬‭Revolution‬‭-‬‭Looking‬‭for‬‭new‬‭markets‬‭for‬‭its‬‭manufactured‬‭goods‬‭and‬
‭sources of raw material.‬
‭●‬ ‭Time period of Laissez Faire‬
‭●‬ ‭By‬ ‭1813,‬ ‭Company‬ ‭territories‬ ‭had‬ ‭greatly‬ ‭expanded‬ ‭-‬ ‭Considered‬ ‭nearly‬ ‭impossible‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬
‭Company to function both as a commercial and political entity.‬
‭●‬ ‭Christian Missionaries advocating for access to India for propagation of Christianity.‬
‭Provisions‬‭-‬
‭●‬ ‭Renewed‬‭Company‬‭charter‬‭for‬‭next‬‭20‬‭Years‬‭-‬‭However‬‭company’s‬‭monopoly‬‭over‬‭trade‬‭broken,‬
‭Exclusive privileges taken back (Exception - Trade in Tea, opium, goods with China )‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭Act‬ ‭explicitly‬ ‭declared‬ ‭the‬ ‭Sovereignty‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭Crown‬ ‭over‬ ‭the‬ ‭territories‬ ‭acquired‬ ‭by‬ ‭the‬
‭company.‬
‭●‬ ‭Indian Courts were granted greater jurisdiction over British and other European subjects.‬
‭●‬ ‭Allowed Christian to go to India and allowed them to settle under a license.‬
‭●‬ ‭Funding‬‭for‬‭education‬‭-‬‭Act‬‭provided‬‭a‬‭yearly‬‭fund‬‭of‬‭Rs‬‭1‬‭Lakh‬‭for‬‭promotion‬‭of‬‭Literature‬‭and‬
‭sciences among Indian subjects.‬
‭●‬ ‭Civil‬‭Service‬‭Reform‬‭-‬‭Act‬‭proposed‬‭open‬‭competition‬‭for‬‭civil‬‭service‬‭positions‬‭and‬‭states‬‭that‬
‭India‬ ‭should‬ ‭be‬ ‭eligible‬ ‭for‬ ‭these‬ ‭roles‬ ‭-‬ ‭However‬ ‭this‬ ‭reform‬ ‭faced‬ ‭opposition‬ ‭and‬ ‭was‬ ‭not‬
‭implemented.‬
‭Assessment of this Act -‬
‭●‬ E‭ conomic‬‭Liberalisation‬‭-‬‭Act‬‭encouraged‬‭competition‬‭and‬‭economic‬‭growth‬‭by‬‭allowing‬‭Indian‬
‭merchants and other Europeans to trade.‬
‭●‬ ‭Social‬ ‭and‬ ‭Religious‬ ‭Changes‬ ‭-‬ ‭Act‬ ‭facilitated‬ ‭the‬ ‭spread‬ ‭of‬ ‭Christianity‬ ‭and‬ ‭social‬ ‭reforms,‬
‭influencing religious and societal dynamics.‬
‭●‬ ‭Educational‬ ‭Advancement‬ ‭-‬ ‭Act‬ ‭funded‬ ‭Indian‬‭Education,‬‭recognising‬‭its‬‭importance‬‭for‬‭social‬
‭progress and intellectual development.‬

‭5‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Charter Act of 1833‬


‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ K‭ nown‬‭as‬‭Saint‬‭Helena‬‭Act‬‭-‬‭Transfer‬‭of‬‭ownership‬‭of‬‭island‬‭of‬‭Saint‬‭Helena‬‭from‬‭EIC‬‭to‬‭British‬
‭Crown.‬
‭●‬ ‭EIC trade monopoly - Viewed as harmful‬
‭●‬ ‭Period of Industrial Revolution‬
‭●‬ ‭Liberal Party (Known as Whigs) came into power.‬
‭Main Provisions -‬
‭Legal British Colony‬
‭●‬ ‭India‬‭made‬‭a‬‭British‬‭colony,‬‭and‬‭for‬‭the‬‭first‬‭time‬‭-‬‭GOI‬‭authority‬ ‭established‬‭over‬‭entire‬‭territory‬
‭passed by EIC.‬
‭○‬ ‭All‬‭restrictions‬‭imposed‬‭on‬‭the‬‭entry‬‭of‬‭European‬‭and‬‭British,‬‭abolished‬‭-‬‭European‬‭and‬
‭British could now freely acquire, hold or dispose any property in India.‬
‭●‬ ‭Act‬ ‭extended‬ ‭the‬ ‭Company’s‬ ‭charter‬ ‭for‬ ‭20‬ ‭Years‬ ‭more‬ ‭however‬ ‭-‬ ‭Company’s‬ ‭Exclusive‬ ‭trade‬
‭privileges‬‭Ended‬‭in‬‭all‬‭matters‬ ‭-‬‭Company‬‭asked‬‭to‬‭wind‬‭up‬‭its‬‭commercial‬‭business‬‭as‬‭soon‬‭as‬
‭possible - Role of EIC now only restricted to pure administrative body.‬
‭●‬ ‭GG of Bengal made GG of India and his council known as Indian Counci‬‭l. (William Bentick)‬
‭○‬ ‭Civil, Military, Financial and Revenue matters controlled by GG.‬
‭○‬ ‭For the first time,‬‭the Government that GG ran was‬‭called as Government of India.‬
‭○‬ ‭GG in Council given‬‭Exclusive legislative powers‬‭such‬‭as -‬
‭■‬ ‭Power to repeal, alter or amend any laws or regulations in British territory.‬
‭■‬ ‭Act deprived Governors of Bombay and Madras of their legislative peers.‬
‭●‬ ‭Act‬‭provided‬‭for‬‭appointment‬‭of‬ ‭4th‬‭member‬‭of‬‭GG’s‬‭council‬‭,‬‭He‬‭had‬‭no‬‭voting‬‭rights‬‭-‬‭Could‬‭only‬
‭attend the meeting by Invitation (Law member - Macaulay)‬
‭○‬ ‭Act‬ ‭provided‬ ‭for‬ ‭enactment‬ ‭of‬ ‭Law‬ ‭Commission‬ ‭-‬ ‭First‬ ‭Commission‬ ‭appointed‬ ‭in‬ ‭1834‬
‭under Macauly.‬
‭●‬ ‭CA‬‭1833‬‭made‬‭provisions‬‭to‬‭freely‬‭admit‬‭the‬‭native‬‭of‬‭Indian‬‭to‬‭be‬‭part‬‭of‬‭administration‬‭through‬
‭the process of Competitive examination (Criteria - Fitness)‬
‭●‬ ‭GG was directed to work for abolition of Slavery (Abolished under Indian Slavery Act - 1843)‬
‭Significance‬‭-‬
‭●‬ ‭Act marked the culmination of centralisation process which began with the Act of 1733.‬

‭6‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭Charter Act of 1853‬


‭Background‬‭-‬
‭●‬ H‭ igh‬‭Costs‬‭and‬‭Business‬‭delays‬‭due‬‭to‬‭the‬‭Board‬‭of‬‭Control‬‭and‬‭Court‬‭of‬‭Directors‬‭raised‬‭concerns‬
‭about EIC efficiency.‬
‭●‬ ‭Politically‬ ‭informed‬ ‭Indians‬ ‭formed‬ ‭groups‬ ‭like‬ ‭Bombay‬ ‭Association‬ ‭and‬ ‭Madras‬ ‭Native‬
‭Association who demanded de-centralisation and greater participation in Governance.‬
‭Provisions‬‭-‬
‭●‬ ‭It‬ ‭said‬ ‭that‬ ‭Indian‬ ‭Territories‬ ‭would‬ ‭remains‬ ‭‘in‬ ‭trust‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭Crown,‬ ‭until‬ ‭Parliament‬ ‭should‬
‭otherwise direct’‬
‭●‬ ‭Now‬ ‭the‬ ‭Company‬ ‭disappeared‬ ‭as‬ ‭a‬ ‭commercial‬ ‭agency,‬ ‭remaining‬‭as‬‭a‬‭political‬‭agent‬‭for‬‭the‬
‭Crown.‬
‭●‬ ‭Legislative Provisions -‬
‭○‬ F‭ or‬ ‭the‬ ‭first‬ ‭time,‬ ‭GG’s‬ ‭council‬ ‭Legislative‬ ‭and‬ ‭Executive‬ ‭functions‬ ‭were‬ ‭separated‬‭.‬ ‭The‬
‭Legislative was treated as a special function of the Government.‬
‭○‬ ‭Act‬‭provided‬‭for‬ ‭6‬‭new‬‭members‬‭to‬‭the‬‭council‬‭,‬‭known‬‭as‬‭Legislative‬‭Councillors‬‭-‬‭Leading‬
‭to‬‭creation‬‭of‬‭distinct‬‭GG’s‬‭Legislative‬‭Council,.‬‭Which‬‭came‬‭to‬‭be‬‭known‬‭as‬‭ICS‬‭-‬‭Indian‬
‭Legislative Council. (No Indian representation)‬
‭■‬ ‭Chief‬ ‭Justice‬ ‭+‬ ‭Judge‬ ‭of‬ ‭SC‬ ‭+‬ ‭4‬ ‭Provincial‬ ‭representatives‬‭from‬‭Bengal,‬‭Madras,‬
‭Bombay,‬‭North‬‭Western‬‭Provinces.‬‭(Provincial‬‭Representatives‬‭were‬‭civil‬‭servants‬
‭for the Company with 10 Years of Experience in those respective states)‬

‭○‬ ‭Powers with these councillors -‬


‭■‬ ‭Questions‬ ‭could‬ ‭be‬ ‭asked,‬ ‭policy‬ ‭of‬ ‭Executive‬ ‭Council‬ ‭could‬ ‭be‬ ‭discussed,‬
‭Government‬ ‭could‬ ‭be‬ ‭discussed‬ ‭for‬ ‭its‬ ‭lapses,‬ ‭Bills‬ ‭were‬ ‭referred‬ ‭to‬ ‭Select‬
‭committees, and Legislative Business were conducted in public.‬
‭■‬ ‭However,‬ ‭a‬ ‭Law‬ ‭to‬ ‭be‬ ‭promulgated‬ ‭needed‬ ‭the‬ ‭assessment‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭Governor‬
‭General, and GG could veto any Bill of the legislative council.‬

‭○‬ ‭Executive provisions -‬


‭■‬ L‭ aw was made a full member of GG Executive Council.‬
‭■‬ ‭Taking the strength back to 4.‬

‭7‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭○‬ ‭Directors and Powers‬


‭■‬ N‭ umber of Directors reduced (24 to 18).‬
‭■‬ ‭Directors‬‭divested‬‭of‬‭its‬‭patronage‬‭and‬‭power‬‭of‬‭appointment‬‭as‬‭the‬‭services‬‭were‬
‭thrown‬‭open‬‭to‬‭Competitive‬‭Examination,‬‭in‬‭which‬‭no‬‭discrimination‬‭of‬‭any‬‭kind‬
‭was‬ ‭to‬ ‭be‬ ‭made.‬ ‭(‬‭Macauly‬ ‭Committee‬‭)‬ ‭(‬‭Satyendranath‬ ‭Tagore‬ ‭-‬ ‭First‬ ‭Indian‬ ‭Civil‬
‭Servant (1863‬‭))‬
‭■‬ ‭However,‬‭Court‬‭of‬‭Directors‬‭was‬‭empowered‬‭to‬‭-‬‭Constitute‬‭a‬‭new‬‭Presidency,‬‭Alter‬
‭the boundaries of the existing states, Incorporate the newly acquired state.‬
‭●‬ ‭Under this, A separate Lt. Governorship of Punjab was created un 1859.‬
‭●‬ ‭A separate post of Governor of Bengal was also created.‬

‭Assessment -‬
‭●‬ ‭CA of 1853 marks the beginning of Parliamentary System in India.‬

‭8‬
‭(History)‬
‭(Pointer Notes)‬

‭9‬

You might also like